Is “$limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$” another way of expressing the right-sided limit?Limit $mathop lim limits_n to infty fracnleft( a_1…a_n right)^frac1na_1 + … + a_n$Evaluating $lim limits_x to inftyleft(fracf(x_0 + frac 1x)f(x_0 - frac 1x)right)^x$How can I prove $lim limits_n to inftyleft(1+frac1a_nright)^a_n=e$ without involving function limit?why is $limlimits_ktoinftyfrac1+kk^k=0?$limit $ lim limits_n to infty left(fracz^1/sqrt n + z^-1/sqrt n2right)^n $Prove $limlimits_x to +infty fracf(x)x = limlimits_x to +infty f'(x)$ if both limits existDoes, $mathop lim limits_x to +infty f'(x) = + infty Leftrightarrow mathop lim limits_x to +infty fracf(x)x = + infty $?Formal limit definition in $limlimits_xto+infty fracx^2+29x=+infty$How can I prove that $limlimits_x to x_0 left|fracf(x)g(x)right| = infty$ when working with punctured neighborhoods?Calculate the limit $lim limits_ x to infty left(fracx^2+1x-1right)$

Dynamic SOQL query relationship with field visibility for Users

Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?

Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?

Map of water taps to fill bottles

Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?

How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?

What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?

As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?

Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?

Extension of 2-adic valuation to the real numbers

Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?

Implications of cigar-shaped bodies having rings?

What term is being referred to with "reflected-sound-of-underground-spirits"?

How to display Aura JS Errors Lightning Out

Apply MapThread to all but one variable

Coordinate my way to the name of the (video) game

What is the smallest unit of eos?

Alignment of various blocks in tikz

Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring

How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?

Critique of timeline aesthetic

Initiative: Do I lose my attack/action if my target moves or dies before my turn in combat?

Converting a sprinkler system's 24V AC outputs to 3.3V DC logic inputs

Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?



Is “$limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$” another way of expressing the right-sided limit?


Limit $mathop lim limits_n to infty fracnleft( a_1…a_n right)^frac1na_1 + … + a_n$Evaluating $lim limits_x to inftyleft(fracf(x_0 + frac 1x)f(x_0 - frac 1x)right)^x$How can I prove $lim limits_n to inftyleft(1+frac1a_nright)^a_n=e$ without involving function limit?why is $limlimits_ktoinftyfrac1+kk^k=0?$limit $ lim limits_n to infty left(fracz^1/sqrt n + z^-1/sqrt n2right)^n $Prove $limlimits_x to +infty fracf(x)x = limlimits_x to +infty f'(x)$ if both limits existDoes, $mathop lim limits_x to +infty f'(x) = + infty Leftrightarrow mathop lim limits_x to +infty fracf(x)x = + infty $?Formal limit definition in $limlimits_xto+infty fracx^2+29x=+infty$How can I prove that $limlimits_x to x_0 left|fracf(x)g(x)right| = infty$ when working with punctured neighborhoods?Calculate the limit $lim limits_ x to infty left(fracx^2+1x-1right)$













0












$begingroup$


Let $f:mathbbR to mathbbR$. Can we say that $limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$ is another way of expressing the right-sided limit at $x_0$?

I tried to use the definition of the limit,but I am stuck.Intuitively, it seems true, but I don't know how to prove it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $f:mathbbR to mathbbR$. Can we say that $limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$ is another way of expressing the right-sided limit at $x_0$?

    I tried to use the definition of the limit,but I am stuck.Intuitively, it seems true, but I don't know how to prove it.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $f:mathbbR to mathbbR$. Can we say that $limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$ is another way of expressing the right-sided limit at $x_0$?

      I tried to use the definition of the limit,but I am stuck.Intuitively, it seems true, but I don't know how to prove it.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $f:mathbbR to mathbbR$. Can we say that $limlimits_n to inftyf(x_0+frac1n)=l$ is another way of expressing the right-sided limit at $x_0$?

      I tried to use the definition of the limit,but I am stuck.Intuitively, it seems true, but I don't know how to prove it.







      real-analysis limits definition






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 19 at 12:53









      user21820

      40.4k544163




      40.4k544163










      asked Apr 19 at 10:24









      Math GuyMath Guy

      1657




      1657




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10












          $begingroup$

          No, it is not true. Take, for instance,$$f(x)=begincasessinleft(fracpi xright)&text if xneq0\0&text if x=0.endcases$$Then the limit $lim_xto0^+f(x)$ doesn't exist, in spite of the fact that $lim_ntoinftyfleft(frac1nright)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Apr 19 at 10:35






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Apr 19 at 10:39










          • $begingroup$
            @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – Math Guy
            Apr 19 at 11:42







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Apr 19 at 11:47



















          6












          $begingroup$

          No. Right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$ is $l$ if $f(x_0+r_n) to l$ for every sequence $(r_n)$ decreasing to $0$. A particular sequence will not do. For example, take $f(x)=0$ for $x$ rational and $1$ for $x$ irrational. Take $x_0=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193405%2fis-lim-limits-n-to-inftyfx-0-frac1n-l-another-way-of-expressing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            10












            $begingroup$

            No, it is not true. Take, for instance,$$f(x)=begincasessinleft(fracpi xright)&text if xneq0\0&text if x=0.endcases$$Then the limit $lim_xto0^+f(x)$ doesn't exist, in spite of the fact that $lim_ntoinftyfleft(frac1nright)=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              Apr 19 at 10:35






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Apr 19 at 10:39










            • $begingroup$
              @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
              $endgroup$
              – Math Guy
              Apr 19 at 11:42







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              Apr 19 at 11:47
















            10












            $begingroup$

            No, it is not true. Take, for instance,$$f(x)=begincasessinleft(fracpi xright)&text if xneq0\0&text if x=0.endcases$$Then the limit $lim_xto0^+f(x)$ doesn't exist, in spite of the fact that $lim_ntoinftyfleft(frac1nright)=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              Apr 19 at 10:35






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Apr 19 at 10:39










            • $begingroup$
              @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
              $endgroup$
              – Math Guy
              Apr 19 at 11:42







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              Apr 19 at 11:47














            10












            10








            10





            $begingroup$

            No, it is not true. Take, for instance,$$f(x)=begincasessinleft(fracpi xright)&text if xneq0\0&text if x=0.endcases$$Then the limit $lim_xto0^+f(x)$ doesn't exist, in spite of the fact that $lim_ntoinftyfleft(frac1nright)=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            No, it is not true. Take, for instance,$$f(x)=begincasessinleft(fracpi xright)&text if xneq0\0&text if x=0.endcases$$Then the limit $lim_xto0^+f(x)$ doesn't exist, in spite of the fact that $lim_ntoinftyfleft(frac1nright)=0$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Apr 19 at 20:51

























            answered Apr 19 at 10:27









            José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

            178k24139251




            178k24139251







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              Apr 19 at 10:35






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Apr 19 at 10:39










            • $begingroup$
              @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
              $endgroup$
              – Math Guy
              Apr 19 at 11:42







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              Apr 19 at 11:47













            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              Apr 19 at 10:35






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              Apr 19 at 10:39










            • $begingroup$
              @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
              $endgroup$
              – Math Guy
              Apr 19 at 11:42







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
              $endgroup$
              – Yves Daoust
              Apr 19 at 11:47








            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Apr 19 at 10:35




            $begingroup$
            Who said that $n$ was an integer ? ;-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Apr 19 at 10:35




            3




            3




            $begingroup$
            LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Apr 19 at 10:39




            $begingroup$
            LOL. This is why I prefer the notation for limits that we use in my country: the limit of a sequence $(a_n)_ninmathbb N$ is denoted by $lim_ninmathbb Na_n$, instead of $lim_ntoinftya_n$. So, there is no ambiguity.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            Apr 19 at 10:39












            $begingroup$
            @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – Math Guy
            Apr 19 at 11:42





            $begingroup$
            @YvesDaoust it is an integer. In my country, integers are commonly denoted by $n$, this is why I forgot that this may not be the case everywhere.
            $endgroup$
            – Math Guy
            Apr 19 at 11:42





            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Apr 19 at 11:47





            $begingroup$
            @MathGuy: in my country, "n" stands for "not-necessarily-natural" and is short for "nnn" :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Apr 19 at 11:47












            6












            $begingroup$

            No. Right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$ is $l$ if $f(x_0+r_n) to l$ for every sequence $(r_n)$ decreasing to $0$. A particular sequence will not do. For example, take $f(x)=0$ for $x$ rational and $1$ for $x$ irrational. Take $x_0=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              6












              $begingroup$

              No. Right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$ is $l$ if $f(x_0+r_n) to l$ for every sequence $(r_n)$ decreasing to $0$. A particular sequence will not do. For example, take $f(x)=0$ for $x$ rational and $1$ for $x$ irrational. Take $x_0=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                6












                6








                6





                $begingroup$

                No. Right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$ is $l$ if $f(x_0+r_n) to l$ for every sequence $(r_n)$ decreasing to $0$. A particular sequence will not do. For example, take $f(x)=0$ for $x$ rational and $1$ for $x$ irrational. Take $x_0=0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                No. Right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$ is $l$ if $f(x_0+r_n) to l$ for every sequence $(r_n)$ decreasing to $0$. A particular sequence will not do. For example, take $f(x)=0$ for $x$ rational and $1$ for $x$ irrational. Take $x_0=0$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 19 at 10:27









                Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                78.2k53571




                78.2k53571



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193405%2fis-lim-limits-n-to-inftyfx-0-frac1n-l-another-way-of-expressing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

                    Esgonzo ibérico Índice Descrición Distribución Hábitat Ameazas Notas Véxase tamén "Acerca dos nomes dos anfibios e réptiles galegos""Chalcides bedriagai"Chalcides bedriagai en Carrascal, L. M. Salvador, A. (Eds). Enciclopedia virtual de los vertebrados españoles. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid. España.Fotos

                    How to write a 12-bar blues melodyI-IV-V blues progressionHow to play the bridges in a standard blues progressionHow does Gdim7 fit in C# minor?question on a certain chord progressionMusicology of Melody12 bar blues, spread rhythm: alternative to 6th chord to avoid finger stretchChord progressions/ Root key/ MelodiesHow to put chords (POP-EDM) under a given lead vocal melody (starting from a good knowledge in music theory)Are there “rules” for improvising with the minor pentatonic scale over 12-bar shuffle?Confusion about blues scale and chords