How was Apollo supposed to rendezvous in the case of a lunar abort?Why did Apollo 11 need someone to stay behind in lunar orbit?How did Gemini/ Agena rendezvous?Could the Apollo lunar ascent stage have separated from the descent stage before touchdown in an emergency?Was an elliptical orbit considered for the CSM when planning the Apollo moon landing missions?What was the purpose of an Apollo 10 test?Could the Apollo LM abort mode be engaged after touchdown? What would have happened if it was?How important is plume impingement in rendezvous operations?How long is the Apollo Lunar Module extraction window?Launch window for the Apollo Lunar Module?Rendezvouses in halo or lissajous orbits
In Pandemic, why take the extra step of eradicating a disease after you've cured it?
How to import .txt file with missing data?
Can I use 220 V outlets on a 15 ampere breaker and wire it up as 110 V?
Is it possible to have battery technology that can't be duplicated?
What is the theme of analysis?
Is all-caps blackletter no longer taboo?
Which game is this?
Are skill challenges an official option or homebrewed?
Is there a frequency comparator device?
How to soundproof the Wood Shop?
What did the 8086 (and 8088) do upon encountering an illegal instruction?
How do I properly use a function under a class?
How (un)safe is it to ride barefoot?
Nth term of Van Eck Sequence
Boss making me feel guilty for leaving the company at the end of my internship
Idiom for 'person who gets violent when drunk"
What do you call the action of "describing events as they happen" like sports anchors do?
As easy as Three, Two, One... How fast can you go from Five to Four?
Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?
Can you open the door or die? v2
In The Incredibles 2, why does Screenslaver's name use a pun on something that doesn't exist in the 1950s pastiche?
Can a 40amp breaker be used safely and without issue with a 40amp device on 6AWG wire?
Does the UK delegate some immigration control to the Republic of Ireland?
How can powerful telekinesis avoid violating Newton's 3rd Law?
How was Apollo supposed to rendezvous in the case of a lunar abort?
Why did Apollo 11 need someone to stay behind in lunar orbit?How did Gemini/ Agena rendezvous?Could the Apollo lunar ascent stage have separated from the descent stage before touchdown in an emergency?Was an elliptical orbit considered for the CSM when planning the Apollo moon landing missions?What was the purpose of an Apollo 10 test?Could the Apollo LM abort mode be engaged after touchdown? What would have happened if it was?How important is plume impingement in rendezvous operations?How long is the Apollo Lunar Module extraction window?Launch window for the Apollo Lunar Module?Rendezvouses in halo or lissajous orbits
$begingroup$
If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?
apollo-program abort rendezvous
edited May 29 at 0:20
DrSheldon
8,55423277
asked May 28 at 12:56
Alan BorrowmanAlan Borrowman
5113
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?
apollo-program abort rendezvous
edited May 29 at 0:20
DrSheldon
8,55423277
asked May 28 at 12:56
Alan BorrowmanAlan Borrowman
5113
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:11
$begingroup$
Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
May 29 at 0:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?
apollo-program abort rendezvous
edited May 29 at 0:20
DrSheldon
8,55423277
asked May 28 at 12:56
Alan BorrowmanAlan Borrowman
5113
$endgroup$
If the LEM had to abort at the point of landing on the moon, the CM/SM would be about 1000 miles ahead of it when the LEM reached the same orbit. How could the 2 craft achieve rendezvous ?
apollo-program abort rendezvous
apollo-program abort rendezvous
edited May 29 at 0:20
DrSheldon
8,55423277
asked May 28 at 12:56
Alan BorrowmanAlan Borrowman
5113
edited May 29 at 0:20
DrSheldon
8,55423277
asked May 28 at 12:56
Alan BorrowmanAlan Borrowman
5113
edited May 29 at 0:20
DrSheldon
8,55423277
edited May 29 at 0:20
DrSheldon
8,55423277
edited May 29 at 0:20
DrSheldon
8,55423277
8,55423277
asked May 28 at 12:56
Alan BorrowmanAlan Borrowman
5113
asked May 28 at 12:56
Alan BorrowmanAlan Borrowman
5113
asked May 28 at 12:56
Alan BorrowmanAlan Borrowman
5113
5113
1
$begingroup$
The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:11
$begingroup$
Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
May 29 at 0:18
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:11
$begingroup$
Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
May 29 at 0:18
1
1
$begingroup$
The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:11
$begingroup$
The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:11
$begingroup$
Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
May 29 at 0:18
$begingroup$
Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
May 29 at 0:18
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.
The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.
answered May 28 at 13:28
GremlinWrangerGremlinWranger
3,349319
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
May 29 at 13:54
1
$begingroup$
Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
$endgroup$
– Daniel Jour
May 30 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:
It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.
So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.
answered May 28 at 16:43
indy91indy91
1,01668
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36443%2fhow-was-apollo-supposed-to-rendezvous-in-the-case-of-a-lunar-abort%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.
The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.
answered May 28 at 13:28
GremlinWrangerGremlinWranger
3,349319
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
May 29 at 13:54
1
$begingroup$
Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
$endgroup$
– Daniel Jour
May 30 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.
The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.
answered May 28 at 13:28
GremlinWrangerGremlinWranger
3,349319
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
May 29 at 13:54
1
$begingroup$
Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
$endgroup$
– Daniel Jour
May 30 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.
The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.
answered May 28 at 13:28
GremlinWrangerGremlinWranger
3,349319
$endgroup$
Lower orbits are faster, higher is slower, so by adjusting orbit altitude you can get an orbit that gains or lags until you are in position do execute a Hohmann transfer. The orbit period is around two hours and the velocities involved around a mile a second so 1000 miles does not have to take that long to close up. Especially if you get both craft change orbit to get a better ratio. For a worst case surface abort the CSM will be an hour away in that two hour orbit, so an Lunar Module orbit that takes three hours (CSM does 1.5 two hour orbits) will get rendezvous.
The trickier part comes if your inclination is different, but for an abort straight after landing this would be unchanged.
answered May 28 at 13:28
GremlinWrangerGremlinWranger
3,349319
edited May 28 at 13:43
answered May 28 at 13:28
GremlinWrangerGremlinWranger
3,349319
answered May 28 at 13:28
GremlinWrangerGremlinWranger
3,349319
answered May 28 at 13:28
GremlinWrangerGremlinWranger
3,349319
3,349319
2
$begingroup$
"East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
May 29 at 13:54
1
$begingroup$
Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
$endgroup$
– Daniel Jour
May 30 at 0:52
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
"East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
May 29 at 13:54
1
$begingroup$
Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
$endgroup$
– Daniel Jour
May 30 at 0:52
2
2
$begingroup$
"East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
May 29 at 13:54
$begingroup$
"East takes you Out, Out takes you West, West takes you In, In takes you East. Port and Starboard bring you back. North and South bring you back"
$endgroup$
– Russell McMahon
May 29 at 13:54
1
1
$begingroup$
Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
$endgroup$
– Daniel Jour
May 30 at 0:52
$begingroup$
Reference to what @RussellMcMahon said
$endgroup$
– Daniel Jour
May 30 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:
It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.
So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.
answered May 28 at 16:43
indy91indy91
1,01668
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:
It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.
So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.
answered May 28 at 16:43
indy91indy91
1,01668
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:
It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.
So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.
answered May 28 at 16:43
indy91indy91
1,01668
$endgroup$
There were specific procedures for an abort at any time during the powered descent and after landing. The abort case at the planned time of landing (about 12 minutes after PDI) is covered in this chart:
It is from the LM Rendezvous Procedures - G Mission PDF page 78. It's a bit crowded, but it shows the relative profile between CSM and LM, centered on the CSM. The important points are ABORT (time and position of the abort) and then INS (time and position of the LM orbital insertion). The insertion orbit would be be 10NM perilune and 30NM apolune. At apolune a first phasing maneuver (C1) is done, based on a crew chart or taken from Mission Control. Half an orbit later CSI1 is done, which is a height adjustment maneuver to get back to the nominal rendezvous profile and the CSI2/CDH/TPI maneuvers are then basically identical with a nominal rendezvous sequence.
So essentially one orbit of coasting in a lower orbit than the CSM is added to the nominal profile so that the LM has time to catch up to the CSM. An even later abort from the lunar surface (at the "No Go for T2" point) would even need one additional orbit to catch up.
answered May 28 at 16:43
indy91indy91
1,01668
answered May 28 at 16:43
indy91indy91
1,01668
answered May 28 at 16:43
indy91indy91
1,01668
answered May 28 at 16:43
indy91indy91
1,01668
1,01668
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36443%2fhow-was-apollo-supposed-to-rendezvous-in-the-case-of-a-lunar-abort%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The LEM could easily have aborted into a lower orbit (thus catching up with the CSM over time) or into a higher orbit (thus allowing the CSM to catch up with the LEM) r simply gine parabolic through the CSMs paths and then slowed down. I'm not sure what they opted to do, but those are the three principles that spring to mind.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:11
$begingroup$
Welcome to Space! I am editing the title of your post so it is a proper question.
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
May 29 at 0:18