What does the wifi amplifier exactly amplify?Why does the 802.11 wifi spec allow for 11 channels?Does altitude affect wifi signals?Cascaded vs. non-cascaded bridge-tied load circuits using opampsWhat exactly is the signal strength seen in API for BT/WiFi receivers?Do wireless amplifiers work in both directions?What does a transistor amplify?Single double triode vacuum tube for headphone amp at high voltagesWhat does an op-amp amplify?Gain bandwidth product of amplifier in a DC scenarioA question about selecting and using a fully differential amplifier
Why are backslashes included in this shell script?
My parents claim they cannot pay for my college education; what are my options?
How effective would a full set of plate armor be against wild animals found in temperate regions (bears, snakes, wolves)?
Can I get a photo of an Ancient Arrow?
Does every chapter have to "blow the reader away" so to speak?
A flower's head or heart?
Why did the AvroCar fail to fly above 3 feet?
What publication claimed that Michael Jackson died in a nuclear holocaust?
How to represent jealousy in a cute way?
Can Dive Down protect a creature against Pacifism?
Parsing text written the millitext font
What do I need to do, tax-wise, for a sudden windfall?
Is there a term for someone whose preferred policies are a mix of Left and Right?
Is fission/fusion to iron the most efficient way to convert mass to energy?
What are the advantages of using TLRs to rangefinders?
Past vs. present tense when referring to a fictional character
Should I worry about having my credit pulled multiple times while car shopping?
Placement of positioning lights on A320 winglets
Would a bit of grease on overhead door cables or bearings cause the springs to break?
I sent an angry e-mail to my interviewers about a conflict at my home institution. Could this affect my application?
In The Incredibles 2, why does Screenslaver's name use a pun on something that doesn't exist in the 1950s pastiche?
Opposite of "Concerto Grosso"?
Optimising matrix generation time
Why is it bad to use your whole foot in rock climbing
What does the wifi amplifier exactly amplify?
Why does the 802.11 wifi spec allow for 11 channels?Does altitude affect wifi signals?Cascaded vs. non-cascaded bridge-tied load circuits using opampsWhat exactly is the signal strength seen in API for BT/WiFi receivers?Do wireless amplifiers work in both directions?What does a transistor amplify?Single double triode vacuum tube for headphone amp at high voltagesWhat does an op-amp amplify?Gain bandwidth product of amplifier in a DC scenarioA question about selecting and using a fully differential amplifier
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this operate in full duplex, in principle?
As an practical example, lets take some commercial amplifier. As we can see from the picture, it has one antenna and one I/O port:
On one hand:
- It have to amplify recieved signal, because low power transmitters wouldnt reach it otherwise.
- And it have to amplify transmited signal, because low power recievers wouldnt hear it otherwise.
On other hand, its inputs and outputs are shorted in infinite loop. It definetely recieves that it transmits, and amplifies it, then it amplifies what it recieves and transmits, and so on, so on, so on.. In short words, It should hear itelf, self-excitate and burn!!!
How can this radio amplifier have single input, single output and amplify both recieved and transitted signals!?
operational-amplifier amplifier rf radio wifi
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this operate in full duplex, in principle?
As an practical example, lets take some commercial amplifier. As we can see from the picture, it has one antenna and one I/O port:
On one hand:
- It have to amplify recieved signal, because low power transmitters wouldnt reach it otherwise.
- And it have to amplify transmited signal, because low power recievers wouldnt hear it otherwise.
On other hand, its inputs and outputs are shorted in infinite loop. It definetely recieves that it transmits, and amplifies it, then it amplifies what it recieves and transmits, and so on, so on, so on.. In short words, It should hear itelf, self-excitate and burn!!!
How can this radio amplifier have single input, single output and amplify both recieved and transitted signals!?
operational-amplifier amplifier rf radio wifi
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 12:59
$begingroup$
Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
$endgroup$
– hekete
May 29 at 13:03
$begingroup$
@Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 29 at 13:12
1
$begingroup$
Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
$endgroup$
– AndrejaKo
May 29 at 13:13
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 14:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this operate in full duplex, in principle?
As an practical example, lets take some commercial amplifier. As we can see from the picture, it has one antenna and one I/O port:
On one hand:
- It have to amplify recieved signal, because low power transmitters wouldnt reach it otherwise.
- And it have to amplify transmited signal, because low power recievers wouldnt hear it otherwise.
On other hand, its inputs and outputs are shorted in infinite loop. It definetely recieves that it transmits, and amplifies it, then it amplifies what it recieves and transmits, and so on, so on, so on.. In short words, It should hear itelf, self-excitate and burn!!!
How can this radio amplifier have single input, single output and amplify both recieved and transitted signals!?
operational-amplifier amplifier rf radio wifi
$endgroup$
The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this operate in full duplex, in principle?
As an practical example, lets take some commercial amplifier. As we can see from the picture, it has one antenna and one I/O port:
On one hand:
- It have to amplify recieved signal, because low power transmitters wouldnt reach it otherwise.
- And it have to amplify transmited signal, because low power recievers wouldnt hear it otherwise.
On other hand, its inputs and outputs are shorted in infinite loop. It definetely recieves that it transmits, and amplifies it, then it amplifies what it recieves and transmits, and so on, so on, so on.. In short words, It should hear itelf, self-excitate and burn!!!
How can this radio amplifier have single input, single output and amplify both recieved and transitted signals!?
operational-amplifier amplifier rf radio wifi
operational-amplifier amplifier rf radio wifi
edited May 29 at 12:41
xakepp35
asked May 29 at 12:33
xakepp35xakepp35
23010
23010
2
$begingroup$
Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 12:59
$begingroup$
Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
$endgroup$
– hekete
May 29 at 13:03
$begingroup$
@Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 29 at 13:12
1
$begingroup$
Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
$endgroup$
– AndrejaKo
May 29 at 13:13
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 14:00
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 12:59
$begingroup$
Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
$endgroup$
– hekete
May 29 at 13:03
$begingroup$
@Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 29 at 13:12
1
$begingroup$
Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
$endgroup$
– AndrejaKo
May 29 at 13:13
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 14:00
2
2
$begingroup$
Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 12:59
$begingroup$
Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 12:59
$begingroup$
Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
$endgroup$
– hekete
May 29 at 13:03
$begingroup$
Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
$endgroup$
– hekete
May 29 at 13:03
$begingroup$
@Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 29 at 13:12
$begingroup$
@Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 29 at 13:12
1
1
$begingroup$
Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
$endgroup$
– AndrejaKo
May 29 at 13:13
$begingroup$
Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
$endgroup$
– AndrejaKo
May 29 at 13:13
1
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 14:00
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 14:00
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this
operate in full duplex
It doesn't; read the more detailed specification on the page you linked: -
Operation Mode: Bi-directional, half-duplex, Auto-Switching via
carrier sensing.
The full detailed spec is here: -
Operation Range: 2400-2500 MHz.Operation Mode: Bi-directional,
half-duplex, Auto-Switching via carrier sensing.Frequency Response: ±
1dB over operation range.Input Power: 3dBm (Min.)-20dBm (Max.).Input
Power 5 ~ 20 dBm.Optimal Input Power 9 ~ 15 dBm.Output Power:
8000mW/39dBm nominal for 802.11b/11Mbps.Connector: SMA Receptacle,
50ohm.Transmit Gain: 17dBm nominal.Receiver Gain: 11dBm.Receive Noise
Figure: 3.0dBm nominal.Operating Temperature: -40 to 70
degree.Operating Humidity: Up to 95% relative humidity.Material: Cast
Aluminum.
Note that it has a receiver gain of 11 dB (unlike what other answers may say).
On a slightly different subject, I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't have a downloadable data sheet.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:39
$begingroup$
Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:45
$begingroup$
It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
May 30 at 7:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because of the feedback issues that you mentioned in your question, neither in-line amplifiers, nor the transceivers "feeding" them, can operate in a full duplex fashion when transmitting and receiving on the same RF channel. In the transceiver itself, there are duplex switches that switch between the outgoing and incoming amplifier chains that are triggered with a logic signal from the PHY silicon.
Since an external amplifier does not have access to the TX/RX logic signal, an external amplifier has a detector circuit to sense when the transceiver is transmitting, which then provides the logic signal that switches between the incoming pre-amplifier and outgoing power amplifier chains. It should be noted that, along with the quality of the RF design of the amplifier chains themselves, the speed and accuracy of the detector circuit itself can have huge impacts on the performance of the external amplifier.
An (overly)simplified block diagram can be found on this web site:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
[Sigh] Crappy answer above mine gets 11 upvotes, and mine gets one. Why do I even bother? Guess I'll never get the 50 reps I need to place a lowsy comment on someone else's answer...
$endgroup$
– Hitek
Jun 1 at 2:03
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f440930%2fwhat-does-the-wifi-amplifier-exactly-amplify%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this
operate in full duplex
It doesn't; read the more detailed specification on the page you linked: -
Operation Mode: Bi-directional, half-duplex, Auto-Switching via
carrier sensing.
The full detailed spec is here: -
Operation Range: 2400-2500 MHz.Operation Mode: Bi-directional,
half-duplex, Auto-Switching via carrier sensing.Frequency Response: ±
1dB over operation range.Input Power: 3dBm (Min.)-20dBm (Max.).Input
Power 5 ~ 20 dBm.Optimal Input Power 9 ~ 15 dBm.Output Power:
8000mW/39dBm nominal for 802.11b/11Mbps.Connector: SMA Receptacle,
50ohm.Transmit Gain: 17dBm nominal.Receiver Gain: 11dBm.Receive Noise
Figure: 3.0dBm nominal.Operating Temperature: -40 to 70
degree.Operating Humidity: Up to 95% relative humidity.Material: Cast
Aluminum.
Note that it has a receiver gain of 11 dB (unlike what other answers may say).
On a slightly different subject, I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't have a downloadable data sheet.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:39
$begingroup$
Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:45
$begingroup$
It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
May 30 at 7:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this
operate in full duplex
It doesn't; read the more detailed specification on the page you linked: -
Operation Mode: Bi-directional, half-duplex, Auto-Switching via
carrier sensing.
The full detailed spec is here: -
Operation Range: 2400-2500 MHz.Operation Mode: Bi-directional,
half-duplex, Auto-Switching via carrier sensing.Frequency Response: ±
1dB over operation range.Input Power: 3dBm (Min.)-20dBm (Max.).Input
Power 5 ~ 20 dBm.Optimal Input Power 9 ~ 15 dBm.Output Power:
8000mW/39dBm nominal for 802.11b/11Mbps.Connector: SMA Receptacle,
50ohm.Transmit Gain: 17dBm nominal.Receiver Gain: 11dBm.Receive Noise
Figure: 3.0dBm nominal.Operating Temperature: -40 to 70
degree.Operating Humidity: Up to 95% relative humidity.Material: Cast
Aluminum.
Note that it has a receiver gain of 11 dB (unlike what other answers may say).
On a slightly different subject, I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't have a downloadable data sheet.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:39
$begingroup$
Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:45
$begingroup$
It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
May 30 at 7:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this
operate in full duplex
It doesn't; read the more detailed specification on the page you linked: -
Operation Mode: Bi-directional, half-duplex, Auto-Switching via
carrier sensing.
The full detailed spec is here: -
Operation Range: 2400-2500 MHz.Operation Mode: Bi-directional,
half-duplex, Auto-Switching via carrier sensing.Frequency Response: ±
1dB over operation range.Input Power: 3dBm (Min.)-20dBm (Max.).Input
Power 5 ~ 20 dBm.Optimal Input Power 9 ~ 15 dBm.Output Power:
8000mW/39dBm nominal for 802.11b/11Mbps.Connector: SMA Receptacle,
50ohm.Transmit Gain: 17dBm nominal.Receiver Gain: 11dBm.Receive Noise
Figure: 3.0dBm nominal.Operating Temperature: -40 to 70
degree.Operating Humidity: Up to 95% relative humidity.Material: Cast
Aluminum.
Note that it has a receiver gain of 11 dB (unlike what other answers may say).
On a slightly different subject, I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't have a downloadable data sheet.
$endgroup$
The question is not exactly about the wifi, but on how does this
operate in full duplex
It doesn't; read the more detailed specification on the page you linked: -
Operation Mode: Bi-directional, half-duplex, Auto-Switching via
carrier sensing.
The full detailed spec is here: -
Operation Range: 2400-2500 MHz.Operation Mode: Bi-directional,
half-duplex, Auto-Switching via carrier sensing.Frequency Response: ±
1dB over operation range.Input Power: 3dBm (Min.)-20dBm (Max.).Input
Power 5 ~ 20 dBm.Optimal Input Power 9 ~ 15 dBm.Output Power:
8000mW/39dBm nominal for 802.11b/11Mbps.Connector: SMA Receptacle,
50ohm.Transmit Gain: 17dBm nominal.Receiver Gain: 11dBm.Receive Noise
Figure: 3.0dBm nominal.Operating Temperature: -40 to 70
degree.Operating Humidity: Up to 95% relative humidity.Material: Cast
Aluminum.
Note that it has a receiver gain of 11 dB (unlike what other answers may say).
On a slightly different subject, I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't have a downloadable data sheet.
answered May 29 at 12:58
Andy akaAndy aka
247k11190436
247k11190436
$begingroup$
Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:39
$begingroup$
Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:45
$begingroup$
It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
May 30 at 7:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:39
$begingroup$
Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:45
$begingroup$
It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
May 30 at 7:01
$begingroup$
Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:39
$begingroup$
Oh, that's good. And even good that you omitted fun&popular restriction to the transmitter power. But could you explain a bit on "how does this works", even in a rude blocks? Even if you dont exactly know.. but just a rude assumption on how it is supposed to, in top-level block-scheme like view? At least, how could it avoid self-excitation? I am dont ever trying to commercially-repeat, but just for study-case and answer completeness - it would be just that, what's missing!
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:39
$begingroup$
Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:45
$begingroup$
Sorry, I am Russian. English hardc0r grammar is not best group of my languages, just because we have no nesesary(but assumed) verbs, plus free form of sentence-building, in terms of word ordering.. however I do understand well each "tech" term ^)
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 30 at 0:45
$begingroup$
It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
May 30 at 7:01
$begingroup$
It uses a transmit/receive switch to control amplifier direction. That switch senses if a large carrier signal is detected on a port. If it is it assumes that this is the input from the transmitter and it positions the transmit/receive switch in the appropriate direction. Your English is understandable @xakepp35
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
May 30 at 7:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because of the feedback issues that you mentioned in your question, neither in-line amplifiers, nor the transceivers "feeding" them, can operate in a full duplex fashion when transmitting and receiving on the same RF channel. In the transceiver itself, there are duplex switches that switch between the outgoing and incoming amplifier chains that are triggered with a logic signal from the PHY silicon.
Since an external amplifier does not have access to the TX/RX logic signal, an external amplifier has a detector circuit to sense when the transceiver is transmitting, which then provides the logic signal that switches between the incoming pre-amplifier and outgoing power amplifier chains. It should be noted that, along with the quality of the RF design of the amplifier chains themselves, the speed and accuracy of the detector circuit itself can have huge impacts on the performance of the external amplifier.
An (overly)simplified block diagram can be found on this web site:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
[Sigh] Crappy answer above mine gets 11 upvotes, and mine gets one. Why do I even bother? Guess I'll never get the 50 reps I need to place a lowsy comment on someone else's answer...
$endgroup$
– Hitek
Jun 1 at 2:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because of the feedback issues that you mentioned in your question, neither in-line amplifiers, nor the transceivers "feeding" them, can operate in a full duplex fashion when transmitting and receiving on the same RF channel. In the transceiver itself, there are duplex switches that switch between the outgoing and incoming amplifier chains that are triggered with a logic signal from the PHY silicon.
Since an external amplifier does not have access to the TX/RX logic signal, an external amplifier has a detector circuit to sense when the transceiver is transmitting, which then provides the logic signal that switches between the incoming pre-amplifier and outgoing power amplifier chains. It should be noted that, along with the quality of the RF design of the amplifier chains themselves, the speed and accuracy of the detector circuit itself can have huge impacts on the performance of the external amplifier.
An (overly)simplified block diagram can be found on this web site:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
[Sigh] Crappy answer above mine gets 11 upvotes, and mine gets one. Why do I even bother? Guess I'll never get the 50 reps I need to place a lowsy comment on someone else's answer...
$endgroup$
– Hitek
Jun 1 at 2:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because of the feedback issues that you mentioned in your question, neither in-line amplifiers, nor the transceivers "feeding" them, can operate in a full duplex fashion when transmitting and receiving on the same RF channel. In the transceiver itself, there are duplex switches that switch between the outgoing and incoming amplifier chains that are triggered with a logic signal from the PHY silicon.
Since an external amplifier does not have access to the TX/RX logic signal, an external amplifier has a detector circuit to sense when the transceiver is transmitting, which then provides the logic signal that switches between the incoming pre-amplifier and outgoing power amplifier chains. It should be noted that, along with the quality of the RF design of the amplifier chains themselves, the speed and accuracy of the detector circuit itself can have huge impacts on the performance of the external amplifier.
An (overly)simplified block diagram can be found on this web site:
$endgroup$
Because of the feedback issues that you mentioned in your question, neither in-line amplifiers, nor the transceivers "feeding" them, can operate in a full duplex fashion when transmitting and receiving on the same RF channel. In the transceiver itself, there are duplex switches that switch between the outgoing and incoming amplifier chains that are triggered with a logic signal from the PHY silicon.
Since an external amplifier does not have access to the TX/RX logic signal, an external amplifier has a detector circuit to sense when the transceiver is transmitting, which then provides the logic signal that switches between the incoming pre-amplifier and outgoing power amplifier chains. It should be noted that, along with the quality of the RF design of the amplifier chains themselves, the speed and accuracy of the detector circuit itself can have huge impacts on the performance of the external amplifier.
An (overly)simplified block diagram can be found on this web site:
edited May 31 at 1:51
answered May 31 at 1:45
HitekHitek
313
313
$begingroup$
[Sigh] Crappy answer above mine gets 11 upvotes, and mine gets one. Why do I even bother? Guess I'll never get the 50 reps I need to place a lowsy comment on someone else's answer...
$endgroup$
– Hitek
Jun 1 at 2:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
[Sigh] Crappy answer above mine gets 11 upvotes, and mine gets one. Why do I even bother? Guess I'll never get the 50 reps I need to place a lowsy comment on someone else's answer...
$endgroup$
– Hitek
Jun 1 at 2:03
$begingroup$
[Sigh] Crappy answer above mine gets 11 upvotes, and mine gets one. Why do I even bother? Guess I'll never get the 50 reps I need to place a lowsy comment on someone else's answer...
$endgroup$
– Hitek
Jun 1 at 2:03
$begingroup$
[Sigh] Crappy answer above mine gets 11 upvotes, and mine gets one. Why do I even bother? Guess I'll never get the 50 reps I need to place a lowsy comment on someone else's answer...
$endgroup$
– Hitek
Jun 1 at 2:03
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f440930%2fwhat-does-the-wifi-amplifier-exactly-amplify%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Note that this is most likely illegal to operate without permit.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 12:59
$begingroup$
Well, endless feedback loops are already a solved problem. But I strongly doubt it works as you imagine. There is a wireless protocol with headers and sequence numbers and stuff. It can easily figure out what data it has already received and rebroadcast.
$endgroup$
– hekete
May 29 at 13:03
$begingroup$
@Jeroen3 Thanks for your note. Would it work to cover a village or small city with a single AP?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
May 29 at 13:12
1
$begingroup$
Just a side-note: WiFi itself is half-duplex, so there's no need for full-duplex operation in the amplifier.
$endgroup$
– AndrejaKo
May 29 at 13:13
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 No. Only an amplifier won't get you there. You need WISP gear. Look for mikrotik outdoor products, and request a license from your local telecommunications regulatory body.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen3
May 29 at 14:00