Suppose leased car is totalled: what are financial implications?What should I be wary of when insurer is taking a lot of time to decide whether car is repairable or a total loss?Can leased car be declared as part of net worth?Car insurance versus personal liability insuranceCar accident, my fault what happens with my insurance?Buying out my leased car… residual price negotiable?Is my car overinsured if my net worth is high enough?Company Leased Car - Transfer from a colleagueLeased a car but did not use the mileage - what options do I haveHow can I prepare for my US student debt?Buy my leased car?What should I consider in a decision to lease or buy a car?
Anagram Within an Anagram!
How hard is it to sell a home which is currently mortgaged?
Correct spacing in the alignat*-environment
Averting Real Women Don’t Wear Dresses
Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?
Does anycast addressing add additional latency in any way?
Can gpxpy write .gpx file?
Problem 1.23 in Fulton's Algebraic curves
How can I check type T is among parameter pack Ts... in C++?
Are Finite Automata Turing Complete?
How often can a PC check with passive perception during a combat turn?
What happens when your group is victim of a surprise attack but you can't be surprised?
Did Chinese school textbook maps (c. 1951) "depict China as stretching even into the central Asian republics"?
Find smallest index that is identical to the value in an array
Sir Alex Ferguson advice OR Sir Alex Ferguson's advice
Cross over of arrows in a complex diagram
What is the best delay to use between characters sent to the serial port
Are there semi plausible scenarios where Nuclear Winter could last a thousand years or trigger an ice age?
Children's short story about material that accelerates away from gravity
What's the point of DHS warning passengers about Manila airport?
Dold-Kan correspondence in the category of symmetric spectra
Should I hide continue button until tasks are completed?
Relativistic Doppler Effect from source’s frame
Intuitively, why does putting capacitors in series decrease the equivalent capacitance?
Suppose leased car is totalled: what are financial implications?
What should I be wary of when insurer is taking a lot of time to decide whether car is repairable or a total loss?Can leased car be declared as part of net worth?Car insurance versus personal liability insuranceCar accident, my fault what happens with my insurance?Buying out my leased car… residual price negotiable?Is my car overinsured if my net worth is high enough?Company Leased Car - Transfer from a colleagueLeased a car but did not use the mileage - what options do I haveHow can I prepare for my US student debt?Buy my leased car?What should I consider in a decision to lease or buy a car?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Inspired by this question on totaling vs repairing a car and my situation (I'm leasing a car) my question is:
Suppose a leased car, properly insured as per the lease (i.e., comprehensive) is involved in an accident and is totaled by the insurance company.
What are the financial implications to me? I.e., will it cost me money or will I be over it - with no hit to my wallet - after signing some papers?
united-states car-insurance auto-leasing
|
show 2 more comments
Inspired by this question on totaling vs repairing a car and my situation (I'm leasing a car) my question is:
Suppose a leased car, properly insured as per the lease (i.e., comprehensive) is involved in an accident and is totaled by the insurance company.
What are the financial implications to me? I.e., will it cost me money or will I be over it - with no hit to my wallet - after signing some papers?
united-states car-insurance auto-leasing
1
I suppose there's are international differences. E.g. in the Netherlands, private lease typically includes the comprehensive insurance. This greatly simplifies matters, as there are now only two parties involved. In case of dunk driving, you'd still be responsible, but by default the lease company just loses the car. (They're likely large enough to self-insure)
– MSalters
Jun 10 at 14:31
were you expecting to own the car at the end of the lease, or was this lease on the basis you will return it to the car's owner? as in UK law this makes quite a difference
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 14:38
@WendyG - USA, but fascinating that in the UK it makes a difference! (?) For leases here I can wait to choose at the end of the lease whether to buy (for residual value, spelled out in the contract) or just return it and walk away (assuming within the mileage limit and no damages).
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:57
@davidbak so credit with a balloon payment, a lease(an actual lease not just a fancy name for a loan) is where it is illegal for the leasee to own the vehicle at the end of the lease, it has to go back to the lessor, it is all to do with tax and who gets to write the depreciation off as a loss, and who gets to call it a service which is tax deductible in a different way. But as it is business to business the rules are really weird. This comment was correct at the time of me working in vehicle credit about 15 years ago)
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 15:18
Who's liable for the damage in the contract?
– Mast
Jun 10 at 16:56
|
show 2 more comments
Inspired by this question on totaling vs repairing a car and my situation (I'm leasing a car) my question is:
Suppose a leased car, properly insured as per the lease (i.e., comprehensive) is involved in an accident and is totaled by the insurance company.
What are the financial implications to me? I.e., will it cost me money or will I be over it - with no hit to my wallet - after signing some papers?
united-states car-insurance auto-leasing
Inspired by this question on totaling vs repairing a car and my situation (I'm leasing a car) my question is:
Suppose a leased car, properly insured as per the lease (i.e., comprehensive) is involved in an accident and is totaled by the insurance company.
What are the financial implications to me? I.e., will it cost me money or will I be over it - with no hit to my wallet - after signing some papers?
united-states car-insurance auto-leasing
united-states car-insurance auto-leasing
edited Jun 10 at 14:55
davidbak
asked Jun 9 at 16:40
davidbakdavidbak
2212 silver badges9 bronze badges
2212 silver badges9 bronze badges
1
I suppose there's are international differences. E.g. in the Netherlands, private lease typically includes the comprehensive insurance. This greatly simplifies matters, as there are now only two parties involved. In case of dunk driving, you'd still be responsible, but by default the lease company just loses the car. (They're likely large enough to self-insure)
– MSalters
Jun 10 at 14:31
were you expecting to own the car at the end of the lease, or was this lease on the basis you will return it to the car's owner? as in UK law this makes quite a difference
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 14:38
@WendyG - USA, but fascinating that in the UK it makes a difference! (?) For leases here I can wait to choose at the end of the lease whether to buy (for residual value, spelled out in the contract) or just return it and walk away (assuming within the mileage limit and no damages).
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:57
@davidbak so credit with a balloon payment, a lease(an actual lease not just a fancy name for a loan) is where it is illegal for the leasee to own the vehicle at the end of the lease, it has to go back to the lessor, it is all to do with tax and who gets to write the depreciation off as a loss, and who gets to call it a service which is tax deductible in a different way. But as it is business to business the rules are really weird. This comment was correct at the time of me working in vehicle credit about 15 years ago)
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 15:18
Who's liable for the damage in the contract?
– Mast
Jun 10 at 16:56
|
show 2 more comments
1
I suppose there's are international differences. E.g. in the Netherlands, private lease typically includes the comprehensive insurance. This greatly simplifies matters, as there are now only two parties involved. In case of dunk driving, you'd still be responsible, but by default the lease company just loses the car. (They're likely large enough to self-insure)
– MSalters
Jun 10 at 14:31
were you expecting to own the car at the end of the lease, or was this lease on the basis you will return it to the car's owner? as in UK law this makes quite a difference
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 14:38
@WendyG - USA, but fascinating that in the UK it makes a difference! (?) For leases here I can wait to choose at the end of the lease whether to buy (for residual value, spelled out in the contract) or just return it and walk away (assuming within the mileage limit and no damages).
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:57
@davidbak so credit with a balloon payment, a lease(an actual lease not just a fancy name for a loan) is where it is illegal for the leasee to own the vehicle at the end of the lease, it has to go back to the lessor, it is all to do with tax and who gets to write the depreciation off as a loss, and who gets to call it a service which is tax deductible in a different way. But as it is business to business the rules are really weird. This comment was correct at the time of me working in vehicle credit about 15 years ago)
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 15:18
Who's liable for the damage in the contract?
– Mast
Jun 10 at 16:56
1
1
I suppose there's are international differences. E.g. in the Netherlands, private lease typically includes the comprehensive insurance. This greatly simplifies matters, as there are now only two parties involved. In case of dunk driving, you'd still be responsible, but by default the lease company just loses the car. (They're likely large enough to self-insure)
– MSalters
Jun 10 at 14:31
I suppose there's are international differences. E.g. in the Netherlands, private lease typically includes the comprehensive insurance. This greatly simplifies matters, as there are now only two parties involved. In case of dunk driving, you'd still be responsible, but by default the lease company just loses the car. (They're likely large enough to self-insure)
– MSalters
Jun 10 at 14:31
were you expecting to own the car at the end of the lease, or was this lease on the basis you will return it to the car's owner? as in UK law this makes quite a difference
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 14:38
were you expecting to own the car at the end of the lease, or was this lease on the basis you will return it to the car's owner? as in UK law this makes quite a difference
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 14:38
@WendyG - USA, but fascinating that in the UK it makes a difference! (?) For leases here I can wait to choose at the end of the lease whether to buy (for residual value, spelled out in the contract) or just return it and walk away (assuming within the mileage limit and no damages).
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:57
@WendyG - USA, but fascinating that in the UK it makes a difference! (?) For leases here I can wait to choose at the end of the lease whether to buy (for residual value, spelled out in the contract) or just return it and walk away (assuming within the mileage limit and no damages).
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:57
@davidbak so credit with a balloon payment, a lease(an actual lease not just a fancy name for a loan) is where it is illegal for the leasee to own the vehicle at the end of the lease, it has to go back to the lessor, it is all to do with tax and who gets to write the depreciation off as a loss, and who gets to call it a service which is tax deductible in a different way. But as it is business to business the rules are really weird. This comment was correct at the time of me working in vehicle credit about 15 years ago)
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 15:18
@davidbak so credit with a balloon payment, a lease(an actual lease not just a fancy name for a loan) is where it is illegal for the leasee to own the vehicle at the end of the lease, it has to go back to the lessor, it is all to do with tax and who gets to write the depreciation off as a loss, and who gets to call it a service which is tax deductible in a different way. But as it is business to business the rules are really weird. This comment was correct at the time of me working in vehicle credit about 15 years ago)
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 15:18
Who's liable for the damage in the contract?
– Mast
Jun 10 at 16:56
Who's liable for the damage in the contract?
– Mast
Jun 10 at 16:56
|
show 2 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
In general leasing requires you to have an insurance policy that meets certain criteria (such as the policy being comprehensive).
However, in the event that the vehicle is written off the insurance company will give you (their belief of) the value of the vehicle at the time, less any excess, whereas the leasing company will expect you to give them (their belief of) the value of the vehicle at the time.
So you will be liable for any "excess" (or "deductible"), plus any difference between what the insurance company will pay and what the leasing company expects.
You may wish to speak with your insurance company or leasing company to determine if this is likely to happen - it may depend on the insurer and/or the leasing company.
19
And that is where you should have been offered and signed what is known as a GAP insurance to cover the possible shortfall of insurance payout.
– TomTom
Jun 9 at 19:16
22
The leasing company doesn't ask you for the value of the car. The leasing company will demand from you the current buyout value of the lease. This is equal to the purchase price of the car plus interest to that point minus lease payments already made. This is equivalent to the residual value of the car at the end of lease, plus unpaid lease minus remaining interest.
– user71659
Jun 10 at 4:49
1
@TomTom - don't remember anything called "gap" insurance but it could have flown by me (I know, I know, SE PF&M contributors - I shouldn't have signed the lease without reading and understanding every word, but unlike you guys I'm a normal human being...guess I'll go and read the contract now...)
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:59
3
@davidbak I don't know it's implications for leasing, but when purchasing, GAP is a big deal. I have a family member that opted to skip the GAP insurance, then totaled the car a year later. There was a difference in what the insurance paid them, and what was still owed on the car, of a few grand, which they ended up being responsible for.
– Rich
Jun 10 at 15:04
2
Some companies provide a form of GAP insurance automatically on leases. I know when we leased from Ford, it was included. Before you consider buying the protection, make sure it's not included in your deal. I talked with other companies about a lease and they also had the inclusion, presumably to protect themselves and make it seem like a more premium experience to buyers.
– JPhi1618
Jun 10 at 15:39
|
show 7 more comments
You must pay every dollar of the value of the car as agreed to on the lease. Period.
Some people carry insurance. This insurance will pay out based on the insurance policy. The usual default is that the insurance will buy you a non-smashed used car of comparable make, model, age and trim options. Minus any deductibles.
Note that these are two different numbers calculated in two different ways.
Generally if the second is larger than the first, the money goes into your pocket. That is your equity in the car.
If the first is larger, that means you were upside-down on that car (negative equity) in which case you must pay the difference.
How would you get upside down? One of several ways. That isn't uncommon in a lease, your car takes the biggest depreciation hit the moment you drive it off the lot. It's now a "used car" and sells for less. Or, your previous lease may have been upside down, and rather than make you write a huge check, they folded this debt into your next lease. Happens all the time, and I just described how you can bury an upside-down loss into another new car purchase.
If you don't have the pile of cash to settle up, you can't just shrug it off like a non-recourse mortgage. You must arrange to settle the debt. Assuming you need a car, practicality may well drag you to do it again, buying another new car simply to rollforward the debt you can't pay.
It is also possible to buy gap insurance to cover exactly this eventuality. The lender might even make you buy it (not unlike a house's PMI). Obviously gap insuance won't cover old debt you rolled into this lease...
Why does the insurance write-off affect the equity balance though? The insurer has just replaced one car that was worth less than the outstanding balance of the lease with a lump of cash which can buy a car of the same value outright. However the lease eventually gets settled, does the lessor really care if the asset used is the one originally leased if it has the same value?
– Will
Jun 10 at 9:27
@Will I assume the main reason they care is that it's not the vehicle they actually leased you, and they had no part in determining whether it actually has the same value. Your insurance company may say the original car was worth 10k, and you may buy another car that's the exact same make and model for 10k, but the company you took the lease out with may not agree that this new car is worth 10k. There's probably also legal issues around ownership involved, too; when you lease a car you don't own it, but if you buy a new car to replace a written off lease, you do own the new one.
– Anthony Grist
Jun 10 at 12:34
1
@AnthonyGrist if the lessor has legal ownership then isn't it the insurer's responsibility to compensate them directly for loss of their property?
– Will
Jun 10 at 17:22
1
@Will Yes, the property in question is the vehicle. The lease payoff amount is not property, it's a liability. You could sell the vehicle and use the proceeds to pay off the lease. Likely a dealership will help you do this as part of getting a new lease.
– JimmyJames
Jun 10 at 20:49
1
"you can't just walk away" - err, I am concerned someone reading this might actually think they can be forced to roll-forward into another purchase, and that they don't actually have a choice. Of course they can just walk away - they will likely still owe the debt and could take a hit to their credit score in the mean time, but most times a payment plan can be worked out to avoid a hit, and at-worst a hit to credit while paying off an old debt is usually vastly better than acquiring an even bigger debt for the future. Would be nice to clarify they aren't actually forced, otherwise good answer!
– BrianH
Jun 11 at 14:28
add a comment |
There is additional insurance "GAP". It will pay the rest to buying price. My friend after totalling his few years old Audi got interesting offer - received current value of the car counted by insurer as he left them wreck to be sold in their auction - normally they will even substract remaining value of often "useless" the wreck (he bought similar newer from that amount).
Anyway as you pay an extra lease fees in addition to new price, there is almost no chance you do not loose, but with the GAP (can be made for new or almost new cars only) you lost leasing charges at most, but if it is not brand new car, it would not have value you receive, so you would use it till accident without quite high costs of wear.
Conditions should be similar everywhere - service and work is expensive, so preferred and secure method is often dispose wreck or sold it not repaired...
If it would not be your fault, you may ask offender to pay all your costs not only those covered from his insurance, but often at court or you can insure also lawyer coverage and let that company do this work or get all your rights if insurer fail to pay them all for you at their costs.
There is also interesting lemon car law in some countries.
And 2 examples of greedy services - Ford Transit - plastic cover on starter damaged during accident - insurance company had to pay over €800 for replacement, dealer kept it and sent to Germany for refurbishment, small tick on bumper in Germany (only paint damaged) - probably replacement too as damage paid around €2500.
So as you can see and friend insurance liquidator told me services live from accidents and love to do anything to increase final invoice... Insurance companies even require specific invoice counted by their rules as prices or time spent on common service tasks are often even higher then should be (services do not respect nor want to work in-line with maker standard times at all or love to charge for useless or not done work).
We have "gap insurance" here in the US, typically required (if not recommended) when buying a car and due to depreciation you will owe more for the car than it is worth (ie, you buy a new car and drive it off the lot and total it 30 minutes later). Assuming you have proper gap insurance, you'll be out your deductible but not much else.
– ivanivan
Jun 10 at 12:49
GAP insurance is primarily a player for long-term new vehicle loans (typically greater than 60 months) and/or low down payment loans wherein the buyer has little to no equity. GAP insurance is less relevant on purchases of good quality used cars where the biggest, "new-car-off-the-lot" depreciation has already been "paid" by the original purchaser.
– David W
Jun 10 at 20:50
Would tell there is no GAP possible on used cars in EU. We do not have so reliable cars and they lost value quickly (ex. even Volvo has official end of live around 150000km).
– Tom
Jun 11 at 17:20
add a comment |
This very thing happened to me, I was about 5 months into a 3 years lease when I was caught in a multi-car accident on a highway. The car was destroyed. My insurance company paid out the leaser, and I actually got a refund of overpayment from the leaser (guess the insurance company paid more than was owed by me on the car). (Ontario, Canada, if that makes any difference).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "93"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109878%2fsuppose-leased-car-is-totalled-what-are-financial-implications%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In general leasing requires you to have an insurance policy that meets certain criteria (such as the policy being comprehensive).
However, in the event that the vehicle is written off the insurance company will give you (their belief of) the value of the vehicle at the time, less any excess, whereas the leasing company will expect you to give them (their belief of) the value of the vehicle at the time.
So you will be liable for any "excess" (or "deductible"), plus any difference between what the insurance company will pay and what the leasing company expects.
You may wish to speak with your insurance company or leasing company to determine if this is likely to happen - it may depend on the insurer and/or the leasing company.
19
And that is where you should have been offered and signed what is known as a GAP insurance to cover the possible shortfall of insurance payout.
– TomTom
Jun 9 at 19:16
22
The leasing company doesn't ask you for the value of the car. The leasing company will demand from you the current buyout value of the lease. This is equal to the purchase price of the car plus interest to that point minus lease payments already made. This is equivalent to the residual value of the car at the end of lease, plus unpaid lease minus remaining interest.
– user71659
Jun 10 at 4:49
1
@TomTom - don't remember anything called "gap" insurance but it could have flown by me (I know, I know, SE PF&M contributors - I shouldn't have signed the lease without reading and understanding every word, but unlike you guys I'm a normal human being...guess I'll go and read the contract now...)
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:59
3
@davidbak I don't know it's implications for leasing, but when purchasing, GAP is a big deal. I have a family member that opted to skip the GAP insurance, then totaled the car a year later. There was a difference in what the insurance paid them, and what was still owed on the car, of a few grand, which they ended up being responsible for.
– Rich
Jun 10 at 15:04
2
Some companies provide a form of GAP insurance automatically on leases. I know when we leased from Ford, it was included. Before you consider buying the protection, make sure it's not included in your deal. I talked with other companies about a lease and they also had the inclusion, presumably to protect themselves and make it seem like a more premium experience to buyers.
– JPhi1618
Jun 10 at 15:39
|
show 7 more comments
In general leasing requires you to have an insurance policy that meets certain criteria (such as the policy being comprehensive).
However, in the event that the vehicle is written off the insurance company will give you (their belief of) the value of the vehicle at the time, less any excess, whereas the leasing company will expect you to give them (their belief of) the value of the vehicle at the time.
So you will be liable for any "excess" (or "deductible"), plus any difference between what the insurance company will pay and what the leasing company expects.
You may wish to speak with your insurance company or leasing company to determine if this is likely to happen - it may depend on the insurer and/or the leasing company.
19
And that is where you should have been offered and signed what is known as a GAP insurance to cover the possible shortfall of insurance payout.
– TomTom
Jun 9 at 19:16
22
The leasing company doesn't ask you for the value of the car. The leasing company will demand from you the current buyout value of the lease. This is equal to the purchase price of the car plus interest to that point minus lease payments already made. This is equivalent to the residual value of the car at the end of lease, plus unpaid lease minus remaining interest.
– user71659
Jun 10 at 4:49
1
@TomTom - don't remember anything called "gap" insurance but it could have flown by me (I know, I know, SE PF&M contributors - I shouldn't have signed the lease without reading and understanding every word, but unlike you guys I'm a normal human being...guess I'll go and read the contract now...)
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:59
3
@davidbak I don't know it's implications for leasing, but when purchasing, GAP is a big deal. I have a family member that opted to skip the GAP insurance, then totaled the car a year later. There was a difference in what the insurance paid them, and what was still owed on the car, of a few grand, which they ended up being responsible for.
– Rich
Jun 10 at 15:04
2
Some companies provide a form of GAP insurance automatically on leases. I know when we leased from Ford, it was included. Before you consider buying the protection, make sure it's not included in your deal. I talked with other companies about a lease and they also had the inclusion, presumably to protect themselves and make it seem like a more premium experience to buyers.
– JPhi1618
Jun 10 at 15:39
|
show 7 more comments
In general leasing requires you to have an insurance policy that meets certain criteria (such as the policy being comprehensive).
However, in the event that the vehicle is written off the insurance company will give you (their belief of) the value of the vehicle at the time, less any excess, whereas the leasing company will expect you to give them (their belief of) the value of the vehicle at the time.
So you will be liable for any "excess" (or "deductible"), plus any difference between what the insurance company will pay and what the leasing company expects.
You may wish to speak with your insurance company or leasing company to determine if this is likely to happen - it may depend on the insurer and/or the leasing company.
In general leasing requires you to have an insurance policy that meets certain criteria (such as the policy being comprehensive).
However, in the event that the vehicle is written off the insurance company will give you (their belief of) the value of the vehicle at the time, less any excess, whereas the leasing company will expect you to give them (their belief of) the value of the vehicle at the time.
So you will be liable for any "excess" (or "deductible"), plus any difference between what the insurance company will pay and what the leasing company expects.
You may wish to speak with your insurance company or leasing company to determine if this is likely to happen - it may depend on the insurer and/or the leasing company.
answered Jun 9 at 16:48
xirtxirt
2,6945 silver badges24 bronze badges
2,6945 silver badges24 bronze badges
19
And that is where you should have been offered and signed what is known as a GAP insurance to cover the possible shortfall of insurance payout.
– TomTom
Jun 9 at 19:16
22
The leasing company doesn't ask you for the value of the car. The leasing company will demand from you the current buyout value of the lease. This is equal to the purchase price of the car plus interest to that point minus lease payments already made. This is equivalent to the residual value of the car at the end of lease, plus unpaid lease minus remaining interest.
– user71659
Jun 10 at 4:49
1
@TomTom - don't remember anything called "gap" insurance but it could have flown by me (I know, I know, SE PF&M contributors - I shouldn't have signed the lease without reading and understanding every word, but unlike you guys I'm a normal human being...guess I'll go and read the contract now...)
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:59
3
@davidbak I don't know it's implications for leasing, but when purchasing, GAP is a big deal. I have a family member that opted to skip the GAP insurance, then totaled the car a year later. There was a difference in what the insurance paid them, and what was still owed on the car, of a few grand, which they ended up being responsible for.
– Rich
Jun 10 at 15:04
2
Some companies provide a form of GAP insurance automatically on leases. I know when we leased from Ford, it was included. Before you consider buying the protection, make sure it's not included in your deal. I talked with other companies about a lease and they also had the inclusion, presumably to protect themselves and make it seem like a more premium experience to buyers.
– JPhi1618
Jun 10 at 15:39
|
show 7 more comments
19
And that is where you should have been offered and signed what is known as a GAP insurance to cover the possible shortfall of insurance payout.
– TomTom
Jun 9 at 19:16
22
The leasing company doesn't ask you for the value of the car. The leasing company will demand from you the current buyout value of the lease. This is equal to the purchase price of the car plus interest to that point minus lease payments already made. This is equivalent to the residual value of the car at the end of lease, plus unpaid lease minus remaining interest.
– user71659
Jun 10 at 4:49
1
@TomTom - don't remember anything called "gap" insurance but it could have flown by me (I know, I know, SE PF&M contributors - I shouldn't have signed the lease without reading and understanding every word, but unlike you guys I'm a normal human being...guess I'll go and read the contract now...)
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:59
3
@davidbak I don't know it's implications for leasing, but when purchasing, GAP is a big deal. I have a family member that opted to skip the GAP insurance, then totaled the car a year later. There was a difference in what the insurance paid them, and what was still owed on the car, of a few grand, which they ended up being responsible for.
– Rich
Jun 10 at 15:04
2
Some companies provide a form of GAP insurance automatically on leases. I know when we leased from Ford, it was included. Before you consider buying the protection, make sure it's not included in your deal. I talked with other companies about a lease and they also had the inclusion, presumably to protect themselves and make it seem like a more premium experience to buyers.
– JPhi1618
Jun 10 at 15:39
19
19
And that is where you should have been offered and signed what is known as a GAP insurance to cover the possible shortfall of insurance payout.
– TomTom
Jun 9 at 19:16
And that is where you should have been offered and signed what is known as a GAP insurance to cover the possible shortfall of insurance payout.
– TomTom
Jun 9 at 19:16
22
22
The leasing company doesn't ask you for the value of the car. The leasing company will demand from you the current buyout value of the lease. This is equal to the purchase price of the car plus interest to that point minus lease payments already made. This is equivalent to the residual value of the car at the end of lease, plus unpaid lease minus remaining interest.
– user71659
Jun 10 at 4:49
The leasing company doesn't ask you for the value of the car. The leasing company will demand from you the current buyout value of the lease. This is equal to the purchase price of the car plus interest to that point minus lease payments already made. This is equivalent to the residual value of the car at the end of lease, plus unpaid lease minus remaining interest.
– user71659
Jun 10 at 4:49
1
1
@TomTom - don't remember anything called "gap" insurance but it could have flown by me (I know, I know, SE PF&M contributors - I shouldn't have signed the lease without reading and understanding every word, but unlike you guys I'm a normal human being...guess I'll go and read the contract now...)
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:59
@TomTom - don't remember anything called "gap" insurance but it could have flown by me (I know, I know, SE PF&M contributors - I shouldn't have signed the lease without reading and understanding every word, but unlike you guys I'm a normal human being...guess I'll go and read the contract now...)
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:59
3
3
@davidbak I don't know it's implications for leasing, but when purchasing, GAP is a big deal. I have a family member that opted to skip the GAP insurance, then totaled the car a year later. There was a difference in what the insurance paid them, and what was still owed on the car, of a few grand, which they ended up being responsible for.
– Rich
Jun 10 at 15:04
@davidbak I don't know it's implications for leasing, but when purchasing, GAP is a big deal. I have a family member that opted to skip the GAP insurance, then totaled the car a year later. There was a difference in what the insurance paid them, and what was still owed on the car, of a few grand, which they ended up being responsible for.
– Rich
Jun 10 at 15:04
2
2
Some companies provide a form of GAP insurance automatically on leases. I know when we leased from Ford, it was included. Before you consider buying the protection, make sure it's not included in your deal. I talked with other companies about a lease and they also had the inclusion, presumably to protect themselves and make it seem like a more premium experience to buyers.
– JPhi1618
Jun 10 at 15:39
Some companies provide a form of GAP insurance automatically on leases. I know when we leased from Ford, it was included. Before you consider buying the protection, make sure it's not included in your deal. I talked with other companies about a lease and they also had the inclusion, presumably to protect themselves and make it seem like a more premium experience to buyers.
– JPhi1618
Jun 10 at 15:39
|
show 7 more comments
You must pay every dollar of the value of the car as agreed to on the lease. Period.
Some people carry insurance. This insurance will pay out based on the insurance policy. The usual default is that the insurance will buy you a non-smashed used car of comparable make, model, age and trim options. Minus any deductibles.
Note that these are two different numbers calculated in two different ways.
Generally if the second is larger than the first, the money goes into your pocket. That is your equity in the car.
If the first is larger, that means you were upside-down on that car (negative equity) in which case you must pay the difference.
How would you get upside down? One of several ways. That isn't uncommon in a lease, your car takes the biggest depreciation hit the moment you drive it off the lot. It's now a "used car" and sells for less. Or, your previous lease may have been upside down, and rather than make you write a huge check, they folded this debt into your next lease. Happens all the time, and I just described how you can bury an upside-down loss into another new car purchase.
If you don't have the pile of cash to settle up, you can't just shrug it off like a non-recourse mortgage. You must arrange to settle the debt. Assuming you need a car, practicality may well drag you to do it again, buying another new car simply to rollforward the debt you can't pay.
It is also possible to buy gap insurance to cover exactly this eventuality. The lender might even make you buy it (not unlike a house's PMI). Obviously gap insuance won't cover old debt you rolled into this lease...
Why does the insurance write-off affect the equity balance though? The insurer has just replaced one car that was worth less than the outstanding balance of the lease with a lump of cash which can buy a car of the same value outright. However the lease eventually gets settled, does the lessor really care if the asset used is the one originally leased if it has the same value?
– Will
Jun 10 at 9:27
@Will I assume the main reason they care is that it's not the vehicle they actually leased you, and they had no part in determining whether it actually has the same value. Your insurance company may say the original car was worth 10k, and you may buy another car that's the exact same make and model for 10k, but the company you took the lease out with may not agree that this new car is worth 10k. There's probably also legal issues around ownership involved, too; when you lease a car you don't own it, but if you buy a new car to replace a written off lease, you do own the new one.
– Anthony Grist
Jun 10 at 12:34
1
@AnthonyGrist if the lessor has legal ownership then isn't it the insurer's responsibility to compensate them directly for loss of their property?
– Will
Jun 10 at 17:22
1
@Will Yes, the property in question is the vehicle. The lease payoff amount is not property, it's a liability. You could sell the vehicle and use the proceeds to pay off the lease. Likely a dealership will help you do this as part of getting a new lease.
– JimmyJames
Jun 10 at 20:49
1
"you can't just walk away" - err, I am concerned someone reading this might actually think they can be forced to roll-forward into another purchase, and that they don't actually have a choice. Of course they can just walk away - they will likely still owe the debt and could take a hit to their credit score in the mean time, but most times a payment plan can be worked out to avoid a hit, and at-worst a hit to credit while paying off an old debt is usually vastly better than acquiring an even bigger debt for the future. Would be nice to clarify they aren't actually forced, otherwise good answer!
– BrianH
Jun 11 at 14:28
add a comment |
You must pay every dollar of the value of the car as agreed to on the lease. Period.
Some people carry insurance. This insurance will pay out based on the insurance policy. The usual default is that the insurance will buy you a non-smashed used car of comparable make, model, age and trim options. Minus any deductibles.
Note that these are two different numbers calculated in two different ways.
Generally if the second is larger than the first, the money goes into your pocket. That is your equity in the car.
If the first is larger, that means you were upside-down on that car (negative equity) in which case you must pay the difference.
How would you get upside down? One of several ways. That isn't uncommon in a lease, your car takes the biggest depreciation hit the moment you drive it off the lot. It's now a "used car" and sells for less. Or, your previous lease may have been upside down, and rather than make you write a huge check, they folded this debt into your next lease. Happens all the time, and I just described how you can bury an upside-down loss into another new car purchase.
If you don't have the pile of cash to settle up, you can't just shrug it off like a non-recourse mortgage. You must arrange to settle the debt. Assuming you need a car, practicality may well drag you to do it again, buying another new car simply to rollforward the debt you can't pay.
It is also possible to buy gap insurance to cover exactly this eventuality. The lender might even make you buy it (not unlike a house's PMI). Obviously gap insuance won't cover old debt you rolled into this lease...
Why does the insurance write-off affect the equity balance though? The insurer has just replaced one car that was worth less than the outstanding balance of the lease with a lump of cash which can buy a car of the same value outright. However the lease eventually gets settled, does the lessor really care if the asset used is the one originally leased if it has the same value?
– Will
Jun 10 at 9:27
@Will I assume the main reason they care is that it's not the vehicle they actually leased you, and they had no part in determining whether it actually has the same value. Your insurance company may say the original car was worth 10k, and you may buy another car that's the exact same make and model for 10k, but the company you took the lease out with may not agree that this new car is worth 10k. There's probably also legal issues around ownership involved, too; when you lease a car you don't own it, but if you buy a new car to replace a written off lease, you do own the new one.
– Anthony Grist
Jun 10 at 12:34
1
@AnthonyGrist if the lessor has legal ownership then isn't it the insurer's responsibility to compensate them directly for loss of their property?
– Will
Jun 10 at 17:22
1
@Will Yes, the property in question is the vehicle. The lease payoff amount is not property, it's a liability. You could sell the vehicle and use the proceeds to pay off the lease. Likely a dealership will help you do this as part of getting a new lease.
– JimmyJames
Jun 10 at 20:49
1
"you can't just walk away" - err, I am concerned someone reading this might actually think they can be forced to roll-forward into another purchase, and that they don't actually have a choice. Of course they can just walk away - they will likely still owe the debt and could take a hit to their credit score in the mean time, but most times a payment plan can be worked out to avoid a hit, and at-worst a hit to credit while paying off an old debt is usually vastly better than acquiring an even bigger debt for the future. Would be nice to clarify they aren't actually forced, otherwise good answer!
– BrianH
Jun 11 at 14:28
add a comment |
You must pay every dollar of the value of the car as agreed to on the lease. Period.
Some people carry insurance. This insurance will pay out based on the insurance policy. The usual default is that the insurance will buy you a non-smashed used car of comparable make, model, age and trim options. Minus any deductibles.
Note that these are two different numbers calculated in two different ways.
Generally if the second is larger than the first, the money goes into your pocket. That is your equity in the car.
If the first is larger, that means you were upside-down on that car (negative equity) in which case you must pay the difference.
How would you get upside down? One of several ways. That isn't uncommon in a lease, your car takes the biggest depreciation hit the moment you drive it off the lot. It's now a "used car" and sells for less. Or, your previous lease may have been upside down, and rather than make you write a huge check, they folded this debt into your next lease. Happens all the time, and I just described how you can bury an upside-down loss into another new car purchase.
If you don't have the pile of cash to settle up, you can't just shrug it off like a non-recourse mortgage. You must arrange to settle the debt. Assuming you need a car, practicality may well drag you to do it again, buying another new car simply to rollforward the debt you can't pay.
It is also possible to buy gap insurance to cover exactly this eventuality. The lender might even make you buy it (not unlike a house's PMI). Obviously gap insuance won't cover old debt you rolled into this lease...
You must pay every dollar of the value of the car as agreed to on the lease. Period.
Some people carry insurance. This insurance will pay out based on the insurance policy. The usual default is that the insurance will buy you a non-smashed used car of comparable make, model, age and trim options. Minus any deductibles.
Note that these are two different numbers calculated in two different ways.
Generally if the second is larger than the first, the money goes into your pocket. That is your equity in the car.
If the first is larger, that means you were upside-down on that car (negative equity) in which case you must pay the difference.
How would you get upside down? One of several ways. That isn't uncommon in a lease, your car takes the biggest depreciation hit the moment you drive it off the lot. It's now a "used car" and sells for less. Or, your previous lease may have been upside down, and rather than make you write a huge check, they folded this debt into your next lease. Happens all the time, and I just described how you can bury an upside-down loss into another new car purchase.
If you don't have the pile of cash to settle up, you can't just shrug it off like a non-recourse mortgage. You must arrange to settle the debt. Assuming you need a car, practicality may well drag you to do it again, buying another new car simply to rollforward the debt you can't pay.
It is also possible to buy gap insurance to cover exactly this eventuality. The lender might even make you buy it (not unlike a house's PMI). Obviously gap insuance won't cover old debt you rolled into this lease...
edited Jun 11 at 16:01
answered Jun 9 at 18:58
HarperHarper
27.9k6 gold badges41 silver badges98 bronze badges
27.9k6 gold badges41 silver badges98 bronze badges
Why does the insurance write-off affect the equity balance though? The insurer has just replaced one car that was worth less than the outstanding balance of the lease with a lump of cash which can buy a car of the same value outright. However the lease eventually gets settled, does the lessor really care if the asset used is the one originally leased if it has the same value?
– Will
Jun 10 at 9:27
@Will I assume the main reason they care is that it's not the vehicle they actually leased you, and they had no part in determining whether it actually has the same value. Your insurance company may say the original car was worth 10k, and you may buy another car that's the exact same make and model for 10k, but the company you took the lease out with may not agree that this new car is worth 10k. There's probably also legal issues around ownership involved, too; when you lease a car you don't own it, but if you buy a new car to replace a written off lease, you do own the new one.
– Anthony Grist
Jun 10 at 12:34
1
@AnthonyGrist if the lessor has legal ownership then isn't it the insurer's responsibility to compensate them directly for loss of their property?
– Will
Jun 10 at 17:22
1
@Will Yes, the property in question is the vehicle. The lease payoff amount is not property, it's a liability. You could sell the vehicle and use the proceeds to pay off the lease. Likely a dealership will help you do this as part of getting a new lease.
– JimmyJames
Jun 10 at 20:49
1
"you can't just walk away" - err, I am concerned someone reading this might actually think they can be forced to roll-forward into another purchase, and that they don't actually have a choice. Of course they can just walk away - they will likely still owe the debt and could take a hit to their credit score in the mean time, but most times a payment plan can be worked out to avoid a hit, and at-worst a hit to credit while paying off an old debt is usually vastly better than acquiring an even bigger debt for the future. Would be nice to clarify they aren't actually forced, otherwise good answer!
– BrianH
Jun 11 at 14:28
add a comment |
Why does the insurance write-off affect the equity balance though? The insurer has just replaced one car that was worth less than the outstanding balance of the lease with a lump of cash which can buy a car of the same value outright. However the lease eventually gets settled, does the lessor really care if the asset used is the one originally leased if it has the same value?
– Will
Jun 10 at 9:27
@Will I assume the main reason they care is that it's not the vehicle they actually leased you, and they had no part in determining whether it actually has the same value. Your insurance company may say the original car was worth 10k, and you may buy another car that's the exact same make and model for 10k, but the company you took the lease out with may not agree that this new car is worth 10k. There's probably also legal issues around ownership involved, too; when you lease a car you don't own it, but if you buy a new car to replace a written off lease, you do own the new one.
– Anthony Grist
Jun 10 at 12:34
1
@AnthonyGrist if the lessor has legal ownership then isn't it the insurer's responsibility to compensate them directly for loss of their property?
– Will
Jun 10 at 17:22
1
@Will Yes, the property in question is the vehicle. The lease payoff amount is not property, it's a liability. You could sell the vehicle and use the proceeds to pay off the lease. Likely a dealership will help you do this as part of getting a new lease.
– JimmyJames
Jun 10 at 20:49
1
"you can't just walk away" - err, I am concerned someone reading this might actually think they can be forced to roll-forward into another purchase, and that they don't actually have a choice. Of course they can just walk away - they will likely still owe the debt and could take a hit to their credit score in the mean time, but most times a payment plan can be worked out to avoid a hit, and at-worst a hit to credit while paying off an old debt is usually vastly better than acquiring an even bigger debt for the future. Would be nice to clarify they aren't actually forced, otherwise good answer!
– BrianH
Jun 11 at 14:28
Why does the insurance write-off affect the equity balance though? The insurer has just replaced one car that was worth less than the outstanding balance of the lease with a lump of cash which can buy a car of the same value outright. However the lease eventually gets settled, does the lessor really care if the asset used is the one originally leased if it has the same value?
– Will
Jun 10 at 9:27
Why does the insurance write-off affect the equity balance though? The insurer has just replaced one car that was worth less than the outstanding balance of the lease with a lump of cash which can buy a car of the same value outright. However the lease eventually gets settled, does the lessor really care if the asset used is the one originally leased if it has the same value?
– Will
Jun 10 at 9:27
@Will I assume the main reason they care is that it's not the vehicle they actually leased you, and they had no part in determining whether it actually has the same value. Your insurance company may say the original car was worth 10k, and you may buy another car that's the exact same make and model for 10k, but the company you took the lease out with may not agree that this new car is worth 10k. There's probably also legal issues around ownership involved, too; when you lease a car you don't own it, but if you buy a new car to replace a written off lease, you do own the new one.
– Anthony Grist
Jun 10 at 12:34
@Will I assume the main reason they care is that it's not the vehicle they actually leased you, and they had no part in determining whether it actually has the same value. Your insurance company may say the original car was worth 10k, and you may buy another car that's the exact same make and model for 10k, but the company you took the lease out with may not agree that this new car is worth 10k. There's probably also legal issues around ownership involved, too; when you lease a car you don't own it, but if you buy a new car to replace a written off lease, you do own the new one.
– Anthony Grist
Jun 10 at 12:34
1
1
@AnthonyGrist if the lessor has legal ownership then isn't it the insurer's responsibility to compensate them directly for loss of their property?
– Will
Jun 10 at 17:22
@AnthonyGrist if the lessor has legal ownership then isn't it the insurer's responsibility to compensate them directly for loss of their property?
– Will
Jun 10 at 17:22
1
1
@Will Yes, the property in question is the vehicle. The lease payoff amount is not property, it's a liability. You could sell the vehicle and use the proceeds to pay off the lease. Likely a dealership will help you do this as part of getting a new lease.
– JimmyJames
Jun 10 at 20:49
@Will Yes, the property in question is the vehicle. The lease payoff amount is not property, it's a liability. You could sell the vehicle and use the proceeds to pay off the lease. Likely a dealership will help you do this as part of getting a new lease.
– JimmyJames
Jun 10 at 20:49
1
1
"you can't just walk away" - err, I am concerned someone reading this might actually think they can be forced to roll-forward into another purchase, and that they don't actually have a choice. Of course they can just walk away - they will likely still owe the debt and could take a hit to their credit score in the mean time, but most times a payment plan can be worked out to avoid a hit, and at-worst a hit to credit while paying off an old debt is usually vastly better than acquiring an even bigger debt for the future. Would be nice to clarify they aren't actually forced, otherwise good answer!
– BrianH
Jun 11 at 14:28
"you can't just walk away" - err, I am concerned someone reading this might actually think they can be forced to roll-forward into another purchase, and that they don't actually have a choice. Of course they can just walk away - they will likely still owe the debt and could take a hit to their credit score in the mean time, but most times a payment plan can be worked out to avoid a hit, and at-worst a hit to credit while paying off an old debt is usually vastly better than acquiring an even bigger debt for the future. Would be nice to clarify they aren't actually forced, otherwise good answer!
– BrianH
Jun 11 at 14:28
add a comment |
There is additional insurance "GAP". It will pay the rest to buying price. My friend after totalling his few years old Audi got interesting offer - received current value of the car counted by insurer as he left them wreck to be sold in their auction - normally they will even substract remaining value of often "useless" the wreck (he bought similar newer from that amount).
Anyway as you pay an extra lease fees in addition to new price, there is almost no chance you do not loose, but with the GAP (can be made for new or almost new cars only) you lost leasing charges at most, but if it is not brand new car, it would not have value you receive, so you would use it till accident without quite high costs of wear.
Conditions should be similar everywhere - service and work is expensive, so preferred and secure method is often dispose wreck or sold it not repaired...
If it would not be your fault, you may ask offender to pay all your costs not only those covered from his insurance, but often at court or you can insure also lawyer coverage and let that company do this work or get all your rights if insurer fail to pay them all for you at their costs.
There is also interesting lemon car law in some countries.
And 2 examples of greedy services - Ford Transit - plastic cover on starter damaged during accident - insurance company had to pay over €800 for replacement, dealer kept it and sent to Germany for refurbishment, small tick on bumper in Germany (only paint damaged) - probably replacement too as damage paid around €2500.
So as you can see and friend insurance liquidator told me services live from accidents and love to do anything to increase final invoice... Insurance companies even require specific invoice counted by their rules as prices or time spent on common service tasks are often even higher then should be (services do not respect nor want to work in-line with maker standard times at all or love to charge for useless or not done work).
We have "gap insurance" here in the US, typically required (if not recommended) when buying a car and due to depreciation you will owe more for the car than it is worth (ie, you buy a new car and drive it off the lot and total it 30 minutes later). Assuming you have proper gap insurance, you'll be out your deductible but not much else.
– ivanivan
Jun 10 at 12:49
GAP insurance is primarily a player for long-term new vehicle loans (typically greater than 60 months) and/or low down payment loans wherein the buyer has little to no equity. GAP insurance is less relevant on purchases of good quality used cars where the biggest, "new-car-off-the-lot" depreciation has already been "paid" by the original purchaser.
– David W
Jun 10 at 20:50
Would tell there is no GAP possible on used cars in EU. We do not have so reliable cars and they lost value quickly (ex. even Volvo has official end of live around 150000km).
– Tom
Jun 11 at 17:20
add a comment |
There is additional insurance "GAP". It will pay the rest to buying price. My friend after totalling his few years old Audi got interesting offer - received current value of the car counted by insurer as he left them wreck to be sold in their auction - normally they will even substract remaining value of often "useless" the wreck (he bought similar newer from that amount).
Anyway as you pay an extra lease fees in addition to new price, there is almost no chance you do not loose, but with the GAP (can be made for new or almost new cars only) you lost leasing charges at most, but if it is not brand new car, it would not have value you receive, so you would use it till accident without quite high costs of wear.
Conditions should be similar everywhere - service and work is expensive, so preferred and secure method is often dispose wreck or sold it not repaired...
If it would not be your fault, you may ask offender to pay all your costs not only those covered from his insurance, but often at court or you can insure also lawyer coverage and let that company do this work or get all your rights if insurer fail to pay them all for you at their costs.
There is also interesting lemon car law in some countries.
And 2 examples of greedy services - Ford Transit - plastic cover on starter damaged during accident - insurance company had to pay over €800 for replacement, dealer kept it and sent to Germany for refurbishment, small tick on bumper in Germany (only paint damaged) - probably replacement too as damage paid around €2500.
So as you can see and friend insurance liquidator told me services live from accidents and love to do anything to increase final invoice... Insurance companies even require specific invoice counted by their rules as prices or time spent on common service tasks are often even higher then should be (services do not respect nor want to work in-line with maker standard times at all or love to charge for useless or not done work).
We have "gap insurance" here in the US, typically required (if not recommended) when buying a car and due to depreciation you will owe more for the car than it is worth (ie, you buy a new car and drive it off the lot and total it 30 minutes later). Assuming you have proper gap insurance, you'll be out your deductible but not much else.
– ivanivan
Jun 10 at 12:49
GAP insurance is primarily a player for long-term new vehicle loans (typically greater than 60 months) and/or low down payment loans wherein the buyer has little to no equity. GAP insurance is less relevant on purchases of good quality used cars where the biggest, "new-car-off-the-lot" depreciation has already been "paid" by the original purchaser.
– David W
Jun 10 at 20:50
Would tell there is no GAP possible on used cars in EU. We do not have so reliable cars and they lost value quickly (ex. even Volvo has official end of live around 150000km).
– Tom
Jun 11 at 17:20
add a comment |
There is additional insurance "GAP". It will pay the rest to buying price. My friend after totalling his few years old Audi got interesting offer - received current value of the car counted by insurer as he left them wreck to be sold in their auction - normally they will even substract remaining value of often "useless" the wreck (he bought similar newer from that amount).
Anyway as you pay an extra lease fees in addition to new price, there is almost no chance you do not loose, but with the GAP (can be made for new or almost new cars only) you lost leasing charges at most, but if it is not brand new car, it would not have value you receive, so you would use it till accident without quite high costs of wear.
Conditions should be similar everywhere - service and work is expensive, so preferred and secure method is often dispose wreck or sold it not repaired...
If it would not be your fault, you may ask offender to pay all your costs not only those covered from his insurance, but often at court or you can insure also lawyer coverage and let that company do this work or get all your rights if insurer fail to pay them all for you at their costs.
There is also interesting lemon car law in some countries.
And 2 examples of greedy services - Ford Transit - plastic cover on starter damaged during accident - insurance company had to pay over €800 for replacement, dealer kept it and sent to Germany for refurbishment, small tick on bumper in Germany (only paint damaged) - probably replacement too as damage paid around €2500.
So as you can see and friend insurance liquidator told me services live from accidents and love to do anything to increase final invoice... Insurance companies even require specific invoice counted by their rules as prices or time spent on common service tasks are often even higher then should be (services do not respect nor want to work in-line with maker standard times at all or love to charge for useless or not done work).
There is additional insurance "GAP". It will pay the rest to buying price. My friend after totalling his few years old Audi got interesting offer - received current value of the car counted by insurer as he left them wreck to be sold in their auction - normally they will even substract remaining value of often "useless" the wreck (he bought similar newer from that amount).
Anyway as you pay an extra lease fees in addition to new price, there is almost no chance you do not loose, but with the GAP (can be made for new or almost new cars only) you lost leasing charges at most, but if it is not brand new car, it would not have value you receive, so you would use it till accident without quite high costs of wear.
Conditions should be similar everywhere - service and work is expensive, so preferred and secure method is often dispose wreck or sold it not repaired...
If it would not be your fault, you may ask offender to pay all your costs not only those covered from his insurance, but often at court or you can insure also lawyer coverage and let that company do this work or get all your rights if insurer fail to pay them all for you at their costs.
There is also interesting lemon car law in some countries.
And 2 examples of greedy services - Ford Transit - plastic cover on starter damaged during accident - insurance company had to pay over €800 for replacement, dealer kept it and sent to Germany for refurbishment, small tick on bumper in Germany (only paint damaged) - probably replacement too as damage paid around €2500.
So as you can see and friend insurance liquidator told me services live from accidents and love to do anything to increase final invoice... Insurance companies even require specific invoice counted by their rules as prices or time spent on common service tasks are often even higher then should be (services do not respect nor want to work in-line with maker standard times at all or love to charge for useless or not done work).
edited Jun 10 at 17:21
answered Jun 9 at 18:06
TomTom
1666 bronze badges
1666 bronze badges
We have "gap insurance" here in the US, typically required (if not recommended) when buying a car and due to depreciation you will owe more for the car than it is worth (ie, you buy a new car and drive it off the lot and total it 30 minutes later). Assuming you have proper gap insurance, you'll be out your deductible but not much else.
– ivanivan
Jun 10 at 12:49
GAP insurance is primarily a player for long-term new vehicle loans (typically greater than 60 months) and/or low down payment loans wherein the buyer has little to no equity. GAP insurance is less relevant on purchases of good quality used cars where the biggest, "new-car-off-the-lot" depreciation has already been "paid" by the original purchaser.
– David W
Jun 10 at 20:50
Would tell there is no GAP possible on used cars in EU. We do not have so reliable cars and they lost value quickly (ex. even Volvo has official end of live around 150000km).
– Tom
Jun 11 at 17:20
add a comment |
We have "gap insurance" here in the US, typically required (if not recommended) when buying a car and due to depreciation you will owe more for the car than it is worth (ie, you buy a new car and drive it off the lot and total it 30 minutes later). Assuming you have proper gap insurance, you'll be out your deductible but not much else.
– ivanivan
Jun 10 at 12:49
GAP insurance is primarily a player for long-term new vehicle loans (typically greater than 60 months) and/or low down payment loans wherein the buyer has little to no equity. GAP insurance is less relevant on purchases of good quality used cars where the biggest, "new-car-off-the-lot" depreciation has already been "paid" by the original purchaser.
– David W
Jun 10 at 20:50
Would tell there is no GAP possible on used cars in EU. We do not have so reliable cars and they lost value quickly (ex. even Volvo has official end of live around 150000km).
– Tom
Jun 11 at 17:20
We have "gap insurance" here in the US, typically required (if not recommended) when buying a car and due to depreciation you will owe more for the car than it is worth (ie, you buy a new car and drive it off the lot and total it 30 minutes later). Assuming you have proper gap insurance, you'll be out your deductible but not much else.
– ivanivan
Jun 10 at 12:49
We have "gap insurance" here in the US, typically required (if not recommended) when buying a car and due to depreciation you will owe more for the car than it is worth (ie, you buy a new car and drive it off the lot and total it 30 minutes later). Assuming you have proper gap insurance, you'll be out your deductible but not much else.
– ivanivan
Jun 10 at 12:49
GAP insurance is primarily a player for long-term new vehicle loans (typically greater than 60 months) and/or low down payment loans wherein the buyer has little to no equity. GAP insurance is less relevant on purchases of good quality used cars where the biggest, "new-car-off-the-lot" depreciation has already been "paid" by the original purchaser.
– David W
Jun 10 at 20:50
GAP insurance is primarily a player for long-term new vehicle loans (typically greater than 60 months) and/or low down payment loans wherein the buyer has little to no equity. GAP insurance is less relevant on purchases of good quality used cars where the biggest, "new-car-off-the-lot" depreciation has already been "paid" by the original purchaser.
– David W
Jun 10 at 20:50
Would tell there is no GAP possible on used cars in EU. We do not have so reliable cars and they lost value quickly (ex. even Volvo has official end of live around 150000km).
– Tom
Jun 11 at 17:20
Would tell there is no GAP possible on used cars in EU. We do not have so reliable cars and they lost value quickly (ex. even Volvo has official end of live around 150000km).
– Tom
Jun 11 at 17:20
add a comment |
This very thing happened to me, I was about 5 months into a 3 years lease when I was caught in a multi-car accident on a highway. The car was destroyed. My insurance company paid out the leaser, and I actually got a refund of overpayment from the leaser (guess the insurance company paid more than was owed by me on the car). (Ontario, Canada, if that makes any difference).
add a comment |
This very thing happened to me, I was about 5 months into a 3 years lease when I was caught in a multi-car accident on a highway. The car was destroyed. My insurance company paid out the leaser, and I actually got a refund of overpayment from the leaser (guess the insurance company paid more than was owed by me on the car). (Ontario, Canada, if that makes any difference).
add a comment |
This very thing happened to me, I was about 5 months into a 3 years lease when I was caught in a multi-car accident on a highway. The car was destroyed. My insurance company paid out the leaser, and I actually got a refund of overpayment from the leaser (guess the insurance company paid more than was owed by me on the car). (Ontario, Canada, if that makes any difference).
This very thing happened to me, I was about 5 months into a 3 years lease when I was caught in a multi-car accident on a highway. The car was destroyed. My insurance company paid out the leaser, and I actually got a refund of overpayment from the leaser (guess the insurance company paid more than was owed by me on the car). (Ontario, Canada, if that makes any difference).
answered Jun 10 at 19:53
damiandamian
211 bronze badge
211 bronze badge
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109878%2fsuppose-leased-car-is-totalled-what-are-financial-implications%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I suppose there's are international differences. E.g. in the Netherlands, private lease typically includes the comprehensive insurance. This greatly simplifies matters, as there are now only two parties involved. In case of dunk driving, you'd still be responsible, but by default the lease company just loses the car. (They're likely large enough to self-insure)
– MSalters
Jun 10 at 14:31
were you expecting to own the car at the end of the lease, or was this lease on the basis you will return it to the car's owner? as in UK law this makes quite a difference
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 14:38
@WendyG - USA, but fascinating that in the UK it makes a difference! (?) For leases here I can wait to choose at the end of the lease whether to buy (for residual value, spelled out in the contract) or just return it and walk away (assuming within the mileage limit and no damages).
– davidbak
Jun 10 at 14:57
@davidbak so credit with a balloon payment, a lease(an actual lease not just a fancy name for a loan) is where it is illegal for the leasee to own the vehicle at the end of the lease, it has to go back to the lessor, it is all to do with tax and who gets to write the depreciation off as a loss, and who gets to call it a service which is tax deductible in a different way. But as it is business to business the rules are really weird. This comment was correct at the time of me working in vehicle credit about 15 years ago)
– WendyG
Jun 10 at 15:18
Who's liable for the damage in the contract?
– Mast
Jun 10 at 16:56