Are academic associations obliged to comply with the US government?Elsevier actions following US sanctions on IranAre books and professional society memberships allowable expenses under US federal grants?Are professional association membership fees usually paid by one's institution?How prestigious are the meetings of the Optical Society of America (OSA)?Would tenured professors who are charged with a crime generally be fired?Are there any recommendations from professional or academic associations on maximum class size for STEM courses?As a undergraduate math student, what are some of the benefits of joining the American Mathematical Society?Academic changing universities: How to negotiate start date to minimise problems with leaving previous university with little notice?I wrote the code based on a paper's methodology; are there any legal problems with making it open source?What are the legal and ethical implications of “padding” pay with extra hours to compensate for unpaid work?Starting a new academic society
How can I find out about the game world without meta-influencing it?
I sent an angry e-mail to my interviewers about a conflict at my home institution. Could this affect my application?
Am I being scammed by a sugar daddy?
What's the reason for the decade jump in the recent X-Men trilogy?
How effective would a full set of plate armor be against wild animals found in temperate regions (bears, snakes, wolves)?
What game uses dice with compass point arrows, forbidden signs, explosions, arrows and targeting reticles?
Should I move out from my current apartment before the contract ends to save more money?
Arrows inside a commutative diagram using tikzcd
Difference between grep -R and -r
Harley Davidson clattering noise from engine, backfire and failure to start
Has JSON.serialize suppressApexObjectNulls ever worked?
Commencez à vous connecter -- I don't understand the phrasing of this
Why did the Death Eaters wait to reopen the Chamber of Secrets?
Can an escape pod land on Earth from orbit and not be immediately detected?
Is there a term for someone whose preferred policies are a mix of Left and Right?
Fastest way from 10 to 1 with everyone in between
Purpose of cylindrical attachments on Power Transmission towers
What do you call the action of "describing events as they happen" like sports anchors do?
Is it possible to install Firefox on Ubuntu with no desktop enviroment?
What is the color associated with lukewarm?
Parallelized for loop in Bash
Idiom for 'person who gets violent when drunk"
Why is gun control associated with the socially liberal Democratic party?
DBCC SHRINKFILE on the distribution database
Are academic associations obliged to comply with the US government?
Elsevier actions following US sanctions on IranAre books and professional society memberships allowable expenses under US federal grants?Are professional association membership fees usually paid by one's institution?How prestigious are the meetings of the Optical Society of America (OSA)?Would tenured professors who are charged with a crime generally be fired?Are there any recommendations from professional or academic associations on maximum class size for STEM courses?As a undergraduate math student, what are some of the benefits of joining the American Mathematical Society?Academic changing universities: How to negotiate start date to minimise problems with leaving previous university with little notice?I wrote the code based on a paper's methodology; are there any legal problems with making it open source?What are the legal and ethical implications of “padding” pay with extra hours to compensate for unpaid work?Starting a new academic society
I'm shocked by the news that IEEE is forced to ban Huawei employees to be editors and reviewers. It makes me wonder if, hypothetically, the US government determine to "ban" a certain group of people, which happens to include some academics, then under US law, are organizations such as AMS, APS, ACS obliged to comply and ban these people from academic services?
This question is different from Elsevier actions following US sanctions on Iran in that Elsevier is a publisher for profit. IEEE might also count as a publisher for profit. But the organizations that I'm asking here, namely AMS, APS and ACS, are purely professional associations. If they are legally in the same status as Elsevier, it was not previously known to me, and possibly not obvious to others.
legal-issues professional-association
edited May 29 at 15:48
ff524♦
97.7k45394431
asked May 29 at 11:33
Hao ChenHao Chen
2339
add a comment |
I'm shocked by the news that IEEE is forced to ban Huawei employees to be editors and reviewers. It makes me wonder if, hypothetically, the US government determine to "ban" a certain group of people, which happens to include some academics, then under US law, are organizations such as AMS, APS, ACS obliged to comply and ban these people from academic services?
This question is different from Elsevier actions following US sanctions on Iran in that Elsevier is a publisher for profit. IEEE might also count as a publisher for profit. But the organizations that I'm asking here, namely AMS, APS and ACS, are purely professional associations. If they are legally in the same status as Elsevier, it was not previously known to me, and possibly not obvious to others.
legal-issues professional-association
edited May 29 at 15:48
ff524♦
97.7k45394431
asked May 29 at 11:33
Hao ChenHao Chen
2339
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:26
IEEE announced on June 2, 2019 that they lifted the restriction.
– scaaahu
Jun 3 at 3:15
add a comment |
I'm shocked by the news that IEEE is forced to ban Huawei employees to be editors and reviewers. It makes me wonder if, hypothetically, the US government determine to "ban" a certain group of people, which happens to include some academics, then under US law, are organizations such as AMS, APS, ACS obliged to comply and ban these people from academic services?
This question is different from Elsevier actions following US sanctions on Iran in that Elsevier is a publisher for profit. IEEE might also count as a publisher for profit. But the organizations that I'm asking here, namely AMS, APS and ACS, are purely professional associations. If they are legally in the same status as Elsevier, it was not previously known to me, and possibly not obvious to others.
legal-issues professional-association
edited May 29 at 15:48
ff524♦
97.7k45394431
asked May 29 at 11:33
Hao ChenHao Chen
2339
I'm shocked by the news that IEEE is forced to ban Huawei employees to be editors and reviewers. It makes me wonder if, hypothetically, the US government determine to "ban" a certain group of people, which happens to include some academics, then under US law, are organizations such as AMS, APS, ACS obliged to comply and ban these people from academic services?
This question is different from Elsevier actions following US sanctions on Iran in that Elsevier is a publisher for profit. IEEE might also count as a publisher for profit. But the organizations that I'm asking here, namely AMS, APS and ACS, are purely professional associations. If they are legally in the same status as Elsevier, it was not previously known to me, and possibly not obvious to others.
legal-issues professional-association
legal-issues professional-association
edited May 29 at 15:48
ff524♦
97.7k45394431
asked May 29 at 11:33
Hao ChenHao Chen
2339
edited May 29 at 15:48
ff524♦
97.7k45394431
asked May 29 at 11:33
Hao ChenHao Chen
2339
edited May 29 at 15:48
ff524♦
97.7k45394431
edited May 29 at 15:48
ff524♦
97.7k45394431
edited May 29 at 15:48
ff524♦
97.7k45394431
97.7k45394431
asked May 29 at 11:33
Hao ChenHao Chen
2339
asked May 29 at 11:33
Hao ChenHao Chen
2339
asked May 29 at 11:33
Hao ChenHao Chen
2339
2339
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:26
IEEE announced on June 2, 2019 that they lifted the restriction.
– scaaahu
Jun 3 at 3:15
add a comment |
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:26
IEEE announced on June 2, 2019 that they lifted the restriction.
– scaaahu
Jun 3 at 3:15
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:26
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:26
IEEE announced on June 2, 2019 that they lifted the restriction.
– scaaahu
Jun 3 at 3:15
IEEE announced on June 2, 2019 that they lifted the restriction.
– scaaahu
Jun 3 at 3:15
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The organizations you mention, while not controlled by the US government, still need to obey all applicable laws and regulations; employment laws, for example.
But the government, sometimes by presidential decree, has wide latitude to set regulations related to national security. In many cases the claims don't actually need to be proven. That is the nature of "national security". The fear is that it may be too late if you have to wait for congress to act or for solid proof.
Whether this is good or not is a long standing debate as the power can be abused.
answered May 29 at 11:52
BuffyBuffy
67.3k18204310
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:25
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131224%2fare-academic-associations-obliged-to-comply-with-the-us-government%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The organizations you mention, while not controlled by the US government, still need to obey all applicable laws and regulations; employment laws, for example.
But the government, sometimes by presidential decree, has wide latitude to set regulations related to national security. In many cases the claims don't actually need to be proven. That is the nature of "national security". The fear is that it may be too late if you have to wait for congress to act or for solid proof.
Whether this is good or not is a long standing debate as the power can be abused.
answered May 29 at 11:52
BuffyBuffy
67.3k18204310
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:25
add a comment |
The organizations you mention, while not controlled by the US government, still need to obey all applicable laws and regulations; employment laws, for example.
But the government, sometimes by presidential decree, has wide latitude to set regulations related to national security. In many cases the claims don't actually need to be proven. That is the nature of "national security". The fear is that it may be too late if you have to wait for congress to act or for solid proof.
Whether this is good or not is a long standing debate as the power can be abused.
answered May 29 at 11:52
BuffyBuffy
67.3k18204310
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:25
add a comment |
The organizations you mention, while not controlled by the US government, still need to obey all applicable laws and regulations; employment laws, for example.
But the government, sometimes by presidential decree, has wide latitude to set regulations related to national security. In many cases the claims don't actually need to be proven. That is the nature of "national security". The fear is that it may be too late if you have to wait for congress to act or for solid proof.
Whether this is good or not is a long standing debate as the power can be abused.
answered May 29 at 11:52
BuffyBuffy
67.3k18204310
The organizations you mention, while not controlled by the US government, still need to obey all applicable laws and regulations; employment laws, for example.
But the government, sometimes by presidential decree, has wide latitude to set regulations related to national security. In many cases the claims don't actually need to be proven. That is the nature of "national security". The fear is that it may be too late if you have to wait for congress to act or for solid proof.
Whether this is good or not is a long standing debate as the power can be abused.
answered May 29 at 11:52
BuffyBuffy
67.3k18204310
answered May 29 at 11:52
BuffyBuffy
67.3k18204310
answered May 29 at 11:52
BuffyBuffy
67.3k18204310
answered May 29 at 11:52
BuffyBuffy
67.3k18204310
67.3k18204310
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:25
add a comment |
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:25
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:25
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:25
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131224%2fare-academic-associations-obliged-to-comply-with-the-us-government%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– ff524♦
May 30 at 14:26
IEEE announced on June 2, 2019 that they lifted the restriction.
– scaaahu
Jun 3 at 3:15