Save email to .pst instead of .ost in Outlook 2010 The Next CEO of Stack OverflowOutlook 2010 can't connect to Exchange 2003 using RPC over HTTPOutlook 2010 - Login Scripts - auto configure non exchange accountCan't login with name@domain.com // Outlook 2010 and RPC/HTTP to Exchange 2003Disabling Suggested Contacts in Outlook 2010Importing orphaned Outlook 2010 OST fileOffice 2010 OCT Outlook FilepathsHow to update Outlook to point to Office 365 server instead of previous hosted exchange server?Exchange 2010, Send automatic response even if outlook or session is closedMicrosoft Outlook 2010 Cannot Import PST FileOutlook 2010 automatic profile setup not working on Windows 10 Pro
Find non-case sensitive string in a mixed list of elements?
Why the difference in type-inference over the as-pattern in two similar function definitions?
Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?
Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?
Writing differences on a blackboard
How to count occurrences of text in a file?
Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D
Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?
Dominated convergence theorem - what sequence?
What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?
Proper way to express "He disappeared them"
Grabbing quick drinks
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?
Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis
Necessary condition on homology group for a set to be contractible
Unclear about dynamic binding
How I can get glyphs from a fraktur font and use them as identifiers?
Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)
Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?
Poetry, calligrams and TikZ/PStricks challenge
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
Easy to read palindrome checker
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Save email to .pst instead of .ost in Outlook 2010
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowOutlook 2010 can't connect to Exchange 2003 using RPC over HTTPOutlook 2010 - Login Scripts - auto configure non exchange accountCan't login with name@domain.com // Outlook 2010 and RPC/HTTP to Exchange 2003Disabling Suggested Contacts in Outlook 2010Importing orphaned Outlook 2010 OST fileOffice 2010 OCT Outlook FilepathsHow to update Outlook to point to Office 365 server instead of previous hosted exchange server?Exchange 2010, Send automatic response even if outlook or session is closedMicrosoft Outlook 2010 Cannot Import PST FileOutlook 2010 automatic profile setup not working on Windows 10 Pro
We are getting ready to migrate some email users to Office 365 from a 3rd party email host. They use outlook 2010 to access their email on Exchange server. I know how to export to a .pst file, however he wants me to configure the users to automatically start saving to a .pst file so that way it is ready to import when we make the change over. How do I do this? I know that Outlook saves to a .ost file normally, not sure how to make it keep a updated .pst file automatically.
outlook-2010 exchange-migration
add a comment |
We are getting ready to migrate some email users to Office 365 from a 3rd party email host. They use outlook 2010 to access their email on Exchange server. I know how to export to a .pst file, however he wants me to configure the users to automatically start saving to a .pst file so that way it is ready to import when we make the change over. How do I do this? I know that Outlook saves to a .ost file normally, not sure how to make it keep a updated .pst file automatically.
outlook-2010 exchange-migration
add a comment |
We are getting ready to migrate some email users to Office 365 from a 3rd party email host. They use outlook 2010 to access their email on Exchange server. I know how to export to a .pst file, however he wants me to configure the users to automatically start saving to a .pst file so that way it is ready to import when we make the change over. How do I do this? I know that Outlook saves to a .ost file normally, not sure how to make it keep a updated .pst file automatically.
outlook-2010 exchange-migration
We are getting ready to migrate some email users to Office 365 from a 3rd party email host. They use outlook 2010 to access their email on Exchange server. I know how to export to a .pst file, however he wants me to configure the users to automatically start saving to a .pst file so that way it is ready to import when we make the change over. How do I do this? I know that Outlook saves to a .ost file normally, not sure how to make it keep a updated .pst file automatically.
outlook-2010 exchange-migration
outlook-2010 exchange-migration
edited Nov 11 '16 at 23:10
Drifter104
3,15621635
3,15621635
asked Jun 11 '15 at 16:21
RichardWilcox58RichardWilcox58
1313
1313
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
Normally, Outlook will use .ost to save database when you configure IMAP or Exchange account.
If you want to use .pst file, we can recreate outlook profile and change the data path, for your reference:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2752583/en-us
If you want to keep your data from your old account then you need to have a .PST file, you can only perform a move or copy, or convert the file.
See if the following article would help:
http://www.ask.com/answers/611260301/is-there-a-way-to-import-my-microsoft-office-outlook-personal-folders-pst-or-offline-folder-ost-files-into-the-new-installation?qsrc=14106
add a comment |
Outlook uses OST files as a local cache of Exchange mailboxes when connected to an Exchange server using MAPI or Outlook Anywhere; it instead uses PST files when connected to POP3/IMAP4 accounts (*). This local cache can also be disabled for Exchange mailboxes, as others have mentioned.
You could force Outlook to download all messages to a PST file by configuring it to connect to Exchange using POP3/SMTP instead of MAPI or Outlook anywhere, but this would make most Exchange features (like GAL, calendar sharing, shared mailboxes, public folders, and so on) unusable; it's a highly not-recommended configuration.
There is, however, a better option for exporting Exchange mailboxes to PST files: you can do that on the Exchange server itself, using a Mailbox Export Request; you can also do that in bulk, exporting several (or all) of your mailboxes.
(*) In Outlook 2013, OST files are used for IMAP4 too, which makes sense, since IMAP4 keeps the messages on the server and accesses them remotely, instead of downloading them like POP3.
add a comment |
I know that Outlook saves to a .ost file normally
- Just a point of clarification: OST files are only used when Outlook is connecting to Exchange Server using cached mode, which isn't the default AFAIK, so Outlook doesn't normally
save to an OST file, it does so if it's configured in cached mode, so don't take that for granted.
If you want the email to be saved to a PST file rather than an OST file then you'll need to configure Outlook to connect to the Exchange server using POP instead of MAPI or RPC over HTTP(S).
FYI: cached mode is actually the default, you need to turn it off explicitly if you wish so.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 18:31
Oh. Is it dependent on the Outlook version? I don't remember it being the default.
– joeqwerty
Jun 11 '15 at 20:20
At least since 2010, probably 2007 too.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 20:42
add a comment |
You can archive to pst and set all new mail to go into that pst but would need to deactivate any move rule the user has setup. In Account settings you can change the folder where new emails are delivered to. There you can specify a new pst or a existing pst and new emails will be delivered to the inbox of that pst. The setting is under File -> Account settings -> Account Settings -> Change folder. You may also need to notify the user that the email will show up in a different folder. Other ways to kind of do the same thing is auto archive setting of 1 day and running everyday or creating a rule to move incoming files instead of changing the account settings. While not perfect it will shorten the time it takes to archive the remaining items when its ready to move.
add a comment |
All the other answers sticks to the idea, that Exchange Server mailboxes needs to be exported into .pst in order to migrate them to Office 365 via PST importing by network upload. The original question states that data is collected to PST files with Outlook on individual computers, which leads to believe that users should migrate their own data with import tool on Outlook. The difference between OST and PST is well discussed here, and Massimo is closest to best practices with Mailbox Export Requests.
However, intermediate PST files aren't necessary in most cases. Office 365 has several tools to migrate mailbox contents directly from on-premises Exchange:
cutover migration to move all mailboxes (less than 2000) at once
express migration (Exhange 2010/2013/2016) and
staged migration (Exchange 2003/2007) for migrating users part at a time.
There might be some kind of limitations with the 3rd party Exchange provider mentioned that have led to using PST files in the first place, e.g. if they have many companies on one AD and do not want to allow administrative access to them all for a migration of an individual client.
In migration cases where you can't use administrative account on the source system, it is possible to use Application Impersonation instead and limit it to specific OU so that you don't have more privileges than you actually need. That should be fine with a (sane) 3rd party email provider. Example:
New-ManagementRoleAssignment -Name:Office365Migration -Role:ApplicationImpersonation `
-RecipientOrganizationalUnitScope "example.com/Client/Users" `
-User:company.office365migration@example.com
(IMAP migration also exist, but it is way worse than using PST files as it needs passwords from all users in the source system and won't transfer anything else than Inbox (doesn’t migrate contacts, calendar items, tasks or emails bigger than 35 MB). Just do not use it if you already have Exchange.)
If there are any doubt that there might be some problem with direct migration (caused by contracts or configurations with the 3rd party email provider), I'd first take PST backups with Mailbox Export Requests before starting the direct migration. Then you'd have a backup if something is missing.
I understand that this migration has already been done in 2015, but this is generally relevant to anyone who wanders to this page while planning similar migration.
add a comment |
protected by Community♦ Mar 6 '18 at 11:56
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Normally, Outlook will use .ost to save database when you configure IMAP or Exchange account.
If you want to use .pst file, we can recreate outlook profile and change the data path, for your reference:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2752583/en-us
If you want to keep your data from your old account then you need to have a .PST file, you can only perform a move or copy, or convert the file.
See if the following article would help:
http://www.ask.com/answers/611260301/is-there-a-way-to-import-my-microsoft-office-outlook-personal-folders-pst-or-offline-folder-ost-files-into-the-new-installation?qsrc=14106
add a comment |
Normally, Outlook will use .ost to save database when you configure IMAP or Exchange account.
If you want to use .pst file, we can recreate outlook profile and change the data path, for your reference:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2752583/en-us
If you want to keep your data from your old account then you need to have a .PST file, you can only perform a move or copy, or convert the file.
See if the following article would help:
http://www.ask.com/answers/611260301/is-there-a-way-to-import-my-microsoft-office-outlook-personal-folders-pst-or-offline-folder-ost-files-into-the-new-installation?qsrc=14106
add a comment |
Normally, Outlook will use .ost to save database when you configure IMAP or Exchange account.
If you want to use .pst file, we can recreate outlook profile and change the data path, for your reference:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2752583/en-us
If you want to keep your data from your old account then you need to have a .PST file, you can only perform a move or copy, or convert the file.
See if the following article would help:
http://www.ask.com/answers/611260301/is-there-a-way-to-import-my-microsoft-office-outlook-personal-folders-pst-or-offline-folder-ost-files-into-the-new-installation?qsrc=14106
Normally, Outlook will use .ost to save database when you configure IMAP or Exchange account.
If you want to use .pst file, we can recreate outlook profile and change the data path, for your reference:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2752583/en-us
If you want to keep your data from your old account then you need to have a .PST file, you can only perform a move or copy, or convert the file.
See if the following article would help:
http://www.ask.com/answers/611260301/is-there-a-way-to-import-my-microsoft-office-outlook-personal-folders-pst-or-offline-folder-ost-files-into-the-new-installation?qsrc=14106
answered Jun 12 '15 at 11:04
HenryHarvey1972HenryHarvey1972
16
16
add a comment |
add a comment |
Outlook uses OST files as a local cache of Exchange mailboxes when connected to an Exchange server using MAPI or Outlook Anywhere; it instead uses PST files when connected to POP3/IMAP4 accounts (*). This local cache can also be disabled for Exchange mailboxes, as others have mentioned.
You could force Outlook to download all messages to a PST file by configuring it to connect to Exchange using POP3/SMTP instead of MAPI or Outlook anywhere, but this would make most Exchange features (like GAL, calendar sharing, shared mailboxes, public folders, and so on) unusable; it's a highly not-recommended configuration.
There is, however, a better option for exporting Exchange mailboxes to PST files: you can do that on the Exchange server itself, using a Mailbox Export Request; you can also do that in bulk, exporting several (or all) of your mailboxes.
(*) In Outlook 2013, OST files are used for IMAP4 too, which makes sense, since IMAP4 keeps the messages on the server and accesses them remotely, instead of downloading them like POP3.
add a comment |
Outlook uses OST files as a local cache of Exchange mailboxes when connected to an Exchange server using MAPI or Outlook Anywhere; it instead uses PST files when connected to POP3/IMAP4 accounts (*). This local cache can also be disabled for Exchange mailboxes, as others have mentioned.
You could force Outlook to download all messages to a PST file by configuring it to connect to Exchange using POP3/SMTP instead of MAPI or Outlook anywhere, but this would make most Exchange features (like GAL, calendar sharing, shared mailboxes, public folders, and so on) unusable; it's a highly not-recommended configuration.
There is, however, a better option for exporting Exchange mailboxes to PST files: you can do that on the Exchange server itself, using a Mailbox Export Request; you can also do that in bulk, exporting several (or all) of your mailboxes.
(*) In Outlook 2013, OST files are used for IMAP4 too, which makes sense, since IMAP4 keeps the messages on the server and accesses them remotely, instead of downloading them like POP3.
add a comment |
Outlook uses OST files as a local cache of Exchange mailboxes when connected to an Exchange server using MAPI or Outlook Anywhere; it instead uses PST files when connected to POP3/IMAP4 accounts (*). This local cache can also be disabled for Exchange mailboxes, as others have mentioned.
You could force Outlook to download all messages to a PST file by configuring it to connect to Exchange using POP3/SMTP instead of MAPI or Outlook anywhere, but this would make most Exchange features (like GAL, calendar sharing, shared mailboxes, public folders, and so on) unusable; it's a highly not-recommended configuration.
There is, however, a better option for exporting Exchange mailboxes to PST files: you can do that on the Exchange server itself, using a Mailbox Export Request; you can also do that in bulk, exporting several (or all) of your mailboxes.
(*) In Outlook 2013, OST files are used for IMAP4 too, which makes sense, since IMAP4 keeps the messages on the server and accesses them remotely, instead of downloading them like POP3.
Outlook uses OST files as a local cache of Exchange mailboxes when connected to an Exchange server using MAPI or Outlook Anywhere; it instead uses PST files when connected to POP3/IMAP4 accounts (*). This local cache can also be disabled for Exchange mailboxes, as others have mentioned.
You could force Outlook to download all messages to a PST file by configuring it to connect to Exchange using POP3/SMTP instead of MAPI or Outlook anywhere, but this would make most Exchange features (like GAL, calendar sharing, shared mailboxes, public folders, and so on) unusable; it's a highly not-recommended configuration.
There is, however, a better option for exporting Exchange mailboxes to PST files: you can do that on the Exchange server itself, using a Mailbox Export Request; you can also do that in bulk, exporting several (or all) of your mailboxes.
(*) In Outlook 2013, OST files are used for IMAP4 too, which makes sense, since IMAP4 keeps the messages on the server and accesses them remotely, instead of downloading them like POP3.
edited Jun 11 '15 at 18:31
answered Jun 11 '15 at 18:18
MassimoMassimo
53.1k44170282
53.1k44170282
add a comment |
add a comment |
I know that Outlook saves to a .ost file normally
- Just a point of clarification: OST files are only used when Outlook is connecting to Exchange Server using cached mode, which isn't the default AFAIK, so Outlook doesn't normally
save to an OST file, it does so if it's configured in cached mode, so don't take that for granted.
If you want the email to be saved to a PST file rather than an OST file then you'll need to configure Outlook to connect to the Exchange server using POP instead of MAPI or RPC over HTTP(S).
FYI: cached mode is actually the default, you need to turn it off explicitly if you wish so.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 18:31
Oh. Is it dependent on the Outlook version? I don't remember it being the default.
– joeqwerty
Jun 11 '15 at 20:20
At least since 2010, probably 2007 too.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 20:42
add a comment |
I know that Outlook saves to a .ost file normally
- Just a point of clarification: OST files are only used when Outlook is connecting to Exchange Server using cached mode, which isn't the default AFAIK, so Outlook doesn't normally
save to an OST file, it does so if it's configured in cached mode, so don't take that for granted.
If you want the email to be saved to a PST file rather than an OST file then you'll need to configure Outlook to connect to the Exchange server using POP instead of MAPI or RPC over HTTP(S).
FYI: cached mode is actually the default, you need to turn it off explicitly if you wish so.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 18:31
Oh. Is it dependent on the Outlook version? I don't remember it being the default.
– joeqwerty
Jun 11 '15 at 20:20
At least since 2010, probably 2007 too.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 20:42
add a comment |
I know that Outlook saves to a .ost file normally
- Just a point of clarification: OST files are only used when Outlook is connecting to Exchange Server using cached mode, which isn't the default AFAIK, so Outlook doesn't normally
save to an OST file, it does so if it's configured in cached mode, so don't take that for granted.
If you want the email to be saved to a PST file rather than an OST file then you'll need to configure Outlook to connect to the Exchange server using POP instead of MAPI or RPC over HTTP(S).
I know that Outlook saves to a .ost file normally
- Just a point of clarification: OST files are only used when Outlook is connecting to Exchange Server using cached mode, which isn't the default AFAIK, so Outlook doesn't normally
save to an OST file, it does so if it's configured in cached mode, so don't take that for granted.
If you want the email to be saved to a PST file rather than an OST file then you'll need to configure Outlook to connect to the Exchange server using POP instead of MAPI or RPC over HTTP(S).
answered Jun 11 '15 at 16:27
joeqwertyjoeqwerty
96.5k465149
96.5k465149
FYI: cached mode is actually the default, you need to turn it off explicitly if you wish so.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 18:31
Oh. Is it dependent on the Outlook version? I don't remember it being the default.
– joeqwerty
Jun 11 '15 at 20:20
At least since 2010, probably 2007 too.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 20:42
add a comment |
FYI: cached mode is actually the default, you need to turn it off explicitly if you wish so.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 18:31
Oh. Is it dependent on the Outlook version? I don't remember it being the default.
– joeqwerty
Jun 11 '15 at 20:20
At least since 2010, probably 2007 too.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 20:42
FYI: cached mode is actually the default, you need to turn it off explicitly if you wish so.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 18:31
FYI: cached mode is actually the default, you need to turn it off explicitly if you wish so.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 18:31
Oh. Is it dependent on the Outlook version? I don't remember it being the default.
– joeqwerty
Jun 11 '15 at 20:20
Oh. Is it dependent on the Outlook version? I don't remember it being the default.
– joeqwerty
Jun 11 '15 at 20:20
At least since 2010, probably 2007 too.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 20:42
At least since 2010, probably 2007 too.
– Massimo
Jun 11 '15 at 20:42
add a comment |
You can archive to pst and set all new mail to go into that pst but would need to deactivate any move rule the user has setup. In Account settings you can change the folder where new emails are delivered to. There you can specify a new pst or a existing pst and new emails will be delivered to the inbox of that pst. The setting is under File -> Account settings -> Account Settings -> Change folder. You may also need to notify the user that the email will show up in a different folder. Other ways to kind of do the same thing is auto archive setting of 1 day and running everyday or creating a rule to move incoming files instead of changing the account settings. While not perfect it will shorten the time it takes to archive the remaining items when its ready to move.
add a comment |
You can archive to pst and set all new mail to go into that pst but would need to deactivate any move rule the user has setup. In Account settings you can change the folder where new emails are delivered to. There you can specify a new pst or a existing pst and new emails will be delivered to the inbox of that pst. The setting is under File -> Account settings -> Account Settings -> Change folder. You may also need to notify the user that the email will show up in a different folder. Other ways to kind of do the same thing is auto archive setting of 1 day and running everyday or creating a rule to move incoming files instead of changing the account settings. While not perfect it will shorten the time it takes to archive the remaining items when its ready to move.
add a comment |
You can archive to pst and set all new mail to go into that pst but would need to deactivate any move rule the user has setup. In Account settings you can change the folder where new emails are delivered to. There you can specify a new pst or a existing pst and new emails will be delivered to the inbox of that pst. The setting is under File -> Account settings -> Account Settings -> Change folder. You may also need to notify the user that the email will show up in a different folder. Other ways to kind of do the same thing is auto archive setting of 1 day and running everyday or creating a rule to move incoming files instead of changing the account settings. While not perfect it will shorten the time it takes to archive the remaining items when its ready to move.
You can archive to pst and set all new mail to go into that pst but would need to deactivate any move rule the user has setup. In Account settings you can change the folder where new emails are delivered to. There you can specify a new pst or a existing pst and new emails will be delivered to the inbox of that pst. The setting is under File -> Account settings -> Account Settings -> Change folder. You may also need to notify the user that the email will show up in a different folder. Other ways to kind of do the same thing is auto archive setting of 1 day and running everyday or creating a rule to move incoming files instead of changing the account settings. While not perfect it will shorten the time it takes to archive the remaining items when its ready to move.
answered Jun 11 '15 at 17:53
Roger LinRoger Lin
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
All the other answers sticks to the idea, that Exchange Server mailboxes needs to be exported into .pst in order to migrate them to Office 365 via PST importing by network upload. The original question states that data is collected to PST files with Outlook on individual computers, which leads to believe that users should migrate their own data with import tool on Outlook. The difference between OST and PST is well discussed here, and Massimo is closest to best practices with Mailbox Export Requests.
However, intermediate PST files aren't necessary in most cases. Office 365 has several tools to migrate mailbox contents directly from on-premises Exchange:
cutover migration to move all mailboxes (less than 2000) at once
express migration (Exhange 2010/2013/2016) and
staged migration (Exchange 2003/2007) for migrating users part at a time.
There might be some kind of limitations with the 3rd party Exchange provider mentioned that have led to using PST files in the first place, e.g. if they have many companies on one AD and do not want to allow administrative access to them all for a migration of an individual client.
In migration cases where you can't use administrative account on the source system, it is possible to use Application Impersonation instead and limit it to specific OU so that you don't have more privileges than you actually need. That should be fine with a (sane) 3rd party email provider. Example:
New-ManagementRoleAssignment -Name:Office365Migration -Role:ApplicationImpersonation `
-RecipientOrganizationalUnitScope "example.com/Client/Users" `
-User:company.office365migration@example.com
(IMAP migration also exist, but it is way worse than using PST files as it needs passwords from all users in the source system and won't transfer anything else than Inbox (doesn’t migrate contacts, calendar items, tasks or emails bigger than 35 MB). Just do not use it if you already have Exchange.)
If there are any doubt that there might be some problem with direct migration (caused by contracts or configurations with the 3rd party email provider), I'd first take PST backups with Mailbox Export Requests before starting the direct migration. Then you'd have a backup if something is missing.
I understand that this migration has already been done in 2015, but this is generally relevant to anyone who wanders to this page while planning similar migration.
add a comment |
All the other answers sticks to the idea, that Exchange Server mailboxes needs to be exported into .pst in order to migrate them to Office 365 via PST importing by network upload. The original question states that data is collected to PST files with Outlook on individual computers, which leads to believe that users should migrate their own data with import tool on Outlook. The difference between OST and PST is well discussed here, and Massimo is closest to best practices with Mailbox Export Requests.
However, intermediate PST files aren't necessary in most cases. Office 365 has several tools to migrate mailbox contents directly from on-premises Exchange:
cutover migration to move all mailboxes (less than 2000) at once
express migration (Exhange 2010/2013/2016) and
staged migration (Exchange 2003/2007) for migrating users part at a time.
There might be some kind of limitations with the 3rd party Exchange provider mentioned that have led to using PST files in the first place, e.g. if they have many companies on one AD and do not want to allow administrative access to them all for a migration of an individual client.
In migration cases where you can't use administrative account on the source system, it is possible to use Application Impersonation instead and limit it to specific OU so that you don't have more privileges than you actually need. That should be fine with a (sane) 3rd party email provider. Example:
New-ManagementRoleAssignment -Name:Office365Migration -Role:ApplicationImpersonation `
-RecipientOrganizationalUnitScope "example.com/Client/Users" `
-User:company.office365migration@example.com
(IMAP migration also exist, but it is way worse than using PST files as it needs passwords from all users in the source system and won't transfer anything else than Inbox (doesn’t migrate contacts, calendar items, tasks or emails bigger than 35 MB). Just do not use it if you already have Exchange.)
If there are any doubt that there might be some problem with direct migration (caused by contracts or configurations with the 3rd party email provider), I'd first take PST backups with Mailbox Export Requests before starting the direct migration. Then you'd have a backup if something is missing.
I understand that this migration has already been done in 2015, but this is generally relevant to anyone who wanders to this page while planning similar migration.
add a comment |
All the other answers sticks to the idea, that Exchange Server mailboxes needs to be exported into .pst in order to migrate them to Office 365 via PST importing by network upload. The original question states that data is collected to PST files with Outlook on individual computers, which leads to believe that users should migrate their own data with import tool on Outlook. The difference between OST and PST is well discussed here, and Massimo is closest to best practices with Mailbox Export Requests.
However, intermediate PST files aren't necessary in most cases. Office 365 has several tools to migrate mailbox contents directly from on-premises Exchange:
cutover migration to move all mailboxes (less than 2000) at once
express migration (Exhange 2010/2013/2016) and
staged migration (Exchange 2003/2007) for migrating users part at a time.
There might be some kind of limitations with the 3rd party Exchange provider mentioned that have led to using PST files in the first place, e.g. if they have many companies on one AD and do not want to allow administrative access to them all for a migration of an individual client.
In migration cases where you can't use administrative account on the source system, it is possible to use Application Impersonation instead and limit it to specific OU so that you don't have more privileges than you actually need. That should be fine with a (sane) 3rd party email provider. Example:
New-ManagementRoleAssignment -Name:Office365Migration -Role:ApplicationImpersonation `
-RecipientOrganizationalUnitScope "example.com/Client/Users" `
-User:company.office365migration@example.com
(IMAP migration also exist, but it is way worse than using PST files as it needs passwords from all users in the source system and won't transfer anything else than Inbox (doesn’t migrate contacts, calendar items, tasks or emails bigger than 35 MB). Just do not use it if you already have Exchange.)
If there are any doubt that there might be some problem with direct migration (caused by contracts or configurations with the 3rd party email provider), I'd first take PST backups with Mailbox Export Requests before starting the direct migration. Then you'd have a backup if something is missing.
I understand that this migration has already been done in 2015, but this is generally relevant to anyone who wanders to this page while planning similar migration.
All the other answers sticks to the idea, that Exchange Server mailboxes needs to be exported into .pst in order to migrate them to Office 365 via PST importing by network upload. The original question states that data is collected to PST files with Outlook on individual computers, which leads to believe that users should migrate their own data with import tool on Outlook. The difference between OST and PST is well discussed here, and Massimo is closest to best practices with Mailbox Export Requests.
However, intermediate PST files aren't necessary in most cases. Office 365 has several tools to migrate mailbox contents directly from on-premises Exchange:
cutover migration to move all mailboxes (less than 2000) at once
express migration (Exhange 2010/2013/2016) and
staged migration (Exchange 2003/2007) for migrating users part at a time.
There might be some kind of limitations with the 3rd party Exchange provider mentioned that have led to using PST files in the first place, e.g. if they have many companies on one AD and do not want to allow administrative access to them all for a migration of an individual client.
In migration cases where you can't use administrative account on the source system, it is possible to use Application Impersonation instead and limit it to specific OU so that you don't have more privileges than you actually need. That should be fine with a (sane) 3rd party email provider. Example:
New-ManagementRoleAssignment -Name:Office365Migration -Role:ApplicationImpersonation `
-RecipientOrganizationalUnitScope "example.com/Client/Users" `
-User:company.office365migration@example.com
(IMAP migration also exist, but it is way worse than using PST files as it needs passwords from all users in the source system and won't transfer anything else than Inbox (doesn’t migrate contacts, calendar items, tasks or emails bigger than 35 MB). Just do not use it if you already have Exchange.)
If there are any doubt that there might be some problem with direct migration (caused by contracts or configurations with the 3rd party email provider), I'd first take PST backups with Mailbox Export Requests before starting the direct migration. Then you'd have a backup if something is missing.
I understand that this migration has already been done in 2015, but this is generally relevant to anyone who wanders to this page while planning similar migration.
answered Apr 20 '17 at 8:36
Esa JokinenEsa Jokinen
23.6k23359
23.6k23359
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by Community♦ Mar 6 '18 at 11:56
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?