Multiband vertical antenna not working as expectedVertical antenna on HF?Should I chose a vertical or a horizontal HF antenna?Antenna Tripod for a vertical antennaTheoretical Wifi antenna not working for the expected range2 Meter horizontal or vertical dipole polarization?Why a thousand miles long antenna is not needed to receive LW and MW?What material is best to design a dipole antenna working at VHF frequency?2m Biquad - Why not?Why does not a bigger antenna receive more power?Triband vertical antenna 6/2/70

Why aren't (poly-)cotton tents more popular?

If protons are the only stable baryons, why do they decay into neutrons in positron emission?

How to positively portray high and mighty characters?

Set vertical spacing between two particular items

Why won't the ground take my seed?

How well known and how commonly used was Huffman coding in 1979?

Derivative of an algebraic power series in positive characteristic

Was touching your nose a greeting in second millenium Mesopotamia?

How often can a PC check with passive perception during a combat turn?

Forgot chonantanu after already making havdalah over wine

How hard is it to sell a home which is currently mortgaged?

Is adding a new player (or players) a DM decision, or a group decision?

Confusion about multiple information Sets

Do sudoku answers always have a single minimal clue set?

Is this the golf ball that Alan Shepard hit on the Moon?

Pronunciation of "œuf" in "deux œufs kinder" and "bœuf "in "deux bœufs bourguignons" as an exception to silent /f/ in the plural

“Faire” being used to mean “avoir l’air”?

Should I hide continue button until tasks are completed?

Correct spacing in the alignat*-environment

Can you get infinite turns with this 2 card combo?

Generate and Graph the Recamán Sequence

Word Wall of Whimsical Wordy Whatchamacallits

Should I report a leak of confidential HR information?

Why does this fireplace work?



Multiband vertical antenna not working as expected


Vertical antenna on HF?Should I chose a vertical or a horizontal HF antenna?Antenna Tripod for a vertical antennaTheoretical Wifi antenna not working for the expected range2 Meter horizontal or vertical dipole polarization?Why a thousand miles long antenna is not needed to receive LW and MW?What material is best to design a dipole antenna working at VHF frequency?2m Biquad - Why not?Why does not a bigger antenna receive more power?Triband vertical antenna 6/2/70






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


I built a vertical out of a 5M aluminium pipe. It tunes fine (and wide!) on 20M.
I decided to add a loading coil to operate it on 40M, and it also worked fine, albeit not so wide.
While I was at it, I extended the coil for operation on 80M as well. It became super narrow! But it worked.



To test this, I used crocodile wires to bite into the coil. I decided make a remote switch out of relays. But it's not working as expected when operating 80M. The SWR jumps around like crazy on my meter, and at some point it just stays inifinite.



This is what I built:



enter image description here



What I suspect is that when both relays are off, there is a very high voltage across the relays and an arc forms, due to the high Q of the coil.
This does not happen when the 40 or 20M relays are activated. The antenna works more or less as expected when the 40 or 20M relays are active.



Could this be the problem? Could it be solved somehow?



I thought of using traps instead of relays to make the antenna "auto switching", but I'm not sure if traps would add more loss than the relays, or if they would whitstand the high voltages appearing on the coil.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What relays are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    What do you have for radials. If its just a ground rod you should add 1/4 wave radials equal to the lowest band of operation. This can effect SWR readings and directivity.
    $endgroup$
    – KB1CHU
    Jun 11 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    @KB1CHU I'm using the metal roof of my house as a ground plane. I added a random piece (3m) of 9mm aluminium tubing and that seemed to help a bit. The antenna is mounted to one side of the roof, not in the center. The roof is about 6x10m and it's connected to the coax braid.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 12 at 12:59

















5












$begingroup$


I built a vertical out of a 5M aluminium pipe. It tunes fine (and wide!) on 20M.
I decided to add a loading coil to operate it on 40M, and it also worked fine, albeit not so wide.
While I was at it, I extended the coil for operation on 80M as well. It became super narrow! But it worked.



To test this, I used crocodile wires to bite into the coil. I decided make a remote switch out of relays. But it's not working as expected when operating 80M. The SWR jumps around like crazy on my meter, and at some point it just stays inifinite.



This is what I built:



enter image description here



What I suspect is that when both relays are off, there is a very high voltage across the relays and an arc forms, due to the high Q of the coil.
This does not happen when the 40 or 20M relays are activated. The antenna works more or less as expected when the 40 or 20M relays are active.



Could this be the problem? Could it be solved somehow?



I thought of using traps instead of relays to make the antenna "auto switching", but I'm not sure if traps would add more loss than the relays, or if they would whitstand the high voltages appearing on the coil.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What relays are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    What do you have for radials. If its just a ground rod you should add 1/4 wave radials equal to the lowest band of operation. This can effect SWR readings and directivity.
    $endgroup$
    – KB1CHU
    Jun 11 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    @KB1CHU I'm using the metal roof of my house as a ground plane. I added a random piece (3m) of 9mm aluminium tubing and that seemed to help a bit. The antenna is mounted to one side of the roof, not in the center. The roof is about 6x10m and it's connected to the coax braid.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 12 at 12:59













5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


I built a vertical out of a 5M aluminium pipe. It tunes fine (and wide!) on 20M.
I decided to add a loading coil to operate it on 40M, and it also worked fine, albeit not so wide.
While I was at it, I extended the coil for operation on 80M as well. It became super narrow! But it worked.



To test this, I used crocodile wires to bite into the coil. I decided make a remote switch out of relays. But it's not working as expected when operating 80M. The SWR jumps around like crazy on my meter, and at some point it just stays inifinite.



This is what I built:



enter image description here



What I suspect is that when both relays are off, there is a very high voltage across the relays and an arc forms, due to the high Q of the coil.
This does not happen when the 40 or 20M relays are activated. The antenna works more or less as expected when the 40 or 20M relays are active.



Could this be the problem? Could it be solved somehow?



I thought of using traps instead of relays to make the antenna "auto switching", but I'm not sure if traps would add more loss than the relays, or if they would whitstand the high voltages appearing on the coil.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I built a vertical out of a 5M aluminium pipe. It tunes fine (and wide!) on 20M.
I decided to add a loading coil to operate it on 40M, and it also worked fine, albeit not so wide.
While I was at it, I extended the coil for operation on 80M as well. It became super narrow! But it worked.



To test this, I used crocodile wires to bite into the coil. I decided make a remote switch out of relays. But it's not working as expected when operating 80M. The SWR jumps around like crazy on my meter, and at some point it just stays inifinite.



This is what I built:



enter image description here



What I suspect is that when both relays are off, there is a very high voltage across the relays and an arc forms, due to the high Q of the coil.
This does not happen when the 40 or 20M relays are activated. The antenna works more or less as expected when the 40 or 20M relays are active.



Could this be the problem? Could it be solved somehow?



I thought of using traps instead of relays to make the antenna "auto switching", but I'm not sure if traps would add more loss than the relays, or if they would whitstand the high voltages appearing on the coil.







antenna vertical






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jun 9 at 16:05









hjfhjf

2063 bronze badges




2063 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    What relays are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    What do you have for radials. If its just a ground rod you should add 1/4 wave radials equal to the lowest band of operation. This can effect SWR readings and directivity.
    $endgroup$
    – KB1CHU
    Jun 11 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    @KB1CHU I'm using the metal roof of my house as a ground plane. I added a random piece (3m) of 9mm aluminium tubing and that seemed to help a bit. The antenna is mounted to one side of the roof, not in the center. The roof is about 6x10m and it's connected to the coax braid.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 12 at 12:59
















  • $begingroup$
    What relays are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    What do you have for radials. If its just a ground rod you should add 1/4 wave radials equal to the lowest band of operation. This can effect SWR readings and directivity.
    $endgroup$
    – KB1CHU
    Jun 11 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    @KB1CHU I'm using the metal roof of my house as a ground plane. I added a random piece (3m) of 9mm aluminium tubing and that seemed to help a bit. The antenna is mounted to one side of the roof, not in the center. The roof is about 6x10m and it's connected to the coax braid.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 12 at 12:59















$begingroup$
What relays are you using?
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
Jun 9 at 17:37




$begingroup$
What relays are you using?
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
Jun 9 at 17:37












$begingroup$
What do you have for radials. If its just a ground rod you should add 1/4 wave radials equal to the lowest band of operation. This can effect SWR readings and directivity.
$endgroup$
– KB1CHU
Jun 11 at 16:42




$begingroup$
What do you have for radials. If its just a ground rod you should add 1/4 wave radials equal to the lowest band of operation. This can effect SWR readings and directivity.
$endgroup$
– KB1CHU
Jun 11 at 16:42












$begingroup$
@KB1CHU I'm using the metal roof of my house as a ground plane. I added a random piece (3m) of 9mm aluminium tubing and that seemed to help a bit. The antenna is mounted to one side of the roof, not in the center. The roof is about 6x10m and it's connected to the coax braid.
$endgroup$
– hjf
Jun 12 at 12:59




$begingroup$
@KB1CHU I'm using the metal roof of my house as a ground plane. I added a random piece (3m) of 9mm aluminium tubing and that seemed to help a bit. The antenna is mounted to one side of the roof, not in the center. The roof is about 6x10m and it's connected to the coax braid.
$endgroup$
– hjf
Jun 12 at 12:59










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

It may very well be that the open contacts are arcing, and I'm betting that's what is happening.



Here are some possible solutions. How about using different relays that have less tendency to arc:



  1. Open-frame relays with much wider contact spacing

  2. Vacuum relays

  3. Multiple relays in series

Another possibility might be that RF on the control lines may be activating the relays. Suitable RF chokes and bypass capacitors might help that.



It's a myth that all traps are lossy. If they don't get hot to the touch at sustained 100W or higher, then their loss is insignificant. Scroll to the bottom of https://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm:


3.) Do traps create noticeable loss, perhaps one dB per trap typically?



NO! Even the worst traps (coaxial traps) in the worse possible condition of operation are only 1.6dB loss for BOTH traps!







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 17:47










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:50







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 18:03


















1












$begingroup$

Your suspicion is justified. Voltage increases (and current decreases) as you move toward the open-circuited end of the antenna. The most common solution is to situate the loading coil - and, perhaps, a resonating capacitor - at the base of the antenna. A base-loaded vertical only 5m tall will not be very efficient on 80m, but a center-loaded antenna will probably not be great either, as it's only about 1/4 the length of a resonant monopole.



The voltage along the 5m radiator can be reduced and efficiency can be improved by effectively lengthening the radiator with "top hat" conductors. This will increase the current at the top of your 5m aluminum pipe and, depending on the size of the top hat, reduce the amount of inductive loading you need to add.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 16:30










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:31










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
    $endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    Jun 9 at 18:37











  • $begingroup$
    @BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 21:18













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "520"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14682%2fmultiband-vertical-antenna-not-working-as-expected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

It may very well be that the open contacts are arcing, and I'm betting that's what is happening.



Here are some possible solutions. How about using different relays that have less tendency to arc:



  1. Open-frame relays with much wider contact spacing

  2. Vacuum relays

  3. Multiple relays in series

Another possibility might be that RF on the control lines may be activating the relays. Suitable RF chokes and bypass capacitors might help that.



It's a myth that all traps are lossy. If they don't get hot to the touch at sustained 100W or higher, then their loss is insignificant. Scroll to the bottom of https://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm:


3.) Do traps create noticeable loss, perhaps one dB per trap typically?



NO! Even the worst traps (coaxial traps) in the worse possible condition of operation are only 1.6dB loss for BOTH traps!







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 17:47










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:50







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 18:03















4












$begingroup$

It may very well be that the open contacts are arcing, and I'm betting that's what is happening.



Here are some possible solutions. How about using different relays that have less tendency to arc:



  1. Open-frame relays with much wider contact spacing

  2. Vacuum relays

  3. Multiple relays in series

Another possibility might be that RF on the control lines may be activating the relays. Suitable RF chokes and bypass capacitors might help that.



It's a myth that all traps are lossy. If they don't get hot to the touch at sustained 100W or higher, then their loss is insignificant. Scroll to the bottom of https://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm:


3.) Do traps create noticeable loss, perhaps one dB per trap typically?



NO! Even the worst traps (coaxial traps) in the worse possible condition of operation are only 1.6dB loss for BOTH traps!







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 17:47










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:50







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 18:03













4












4








4





$begingroup$

It may very well be that the open contacts are arcing, and I'm betting that's what is happening.



Here are some possible solutions. How about using different relays that have less tendency to arc:



  1. Open-frame relays with much wider contact spacing

  2. Vacuum relays

  3. Multiple relays in series

Another possibility might be that RF on the control lines may be activating the relays. Suitable RF chokes and bypass capacitors might help that.



It's a myth that all traps are lossy. If they don't get hot to the touch at sustained 100W or higher, then their loss is insignificant. Scroll to the bottom of https://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm:


3.) Do traps create noticeable loss, perhaps one dB per trap typically?



NO! Even the worst traps (coaxial traps) in the worse possible condition of operation are only 1.6dB loss for BOTH traps!







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



It may very well be that the open contacts are arcing, and I'm betting that's what is happening.



Here are some possible solutions. How about using different relays that have less tendency to arc:



  1. Open-frame relays with much wider contact spacing

  2. Vacuum relays

  3. Multiple relays in series

Another possibility might be that RF on the control lines may be activating the relays. Suitable RF chokes and bypass capacitors might help that.



It's a myth that all traps are lossy. If they don't get hot to the touch at sustained 100W or higher, then their loss is insignificant. Scroll to the bottom of https://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm:


3.) Do traps create noticeable loss, perhaps one dB per trap typically?



NO! Even the worst traps (coaxial traps) in the worse possible condition of operation are only 1.6dB loss for BOTH traps!








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jun 9 at 17:52

























answered Jun 9 at 17:29









Mike WatersMike Waters

4,1952 gold badges6 silver badges35 bronze badges




4,1952 gold badges6 silver badges35 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 17:47










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:50







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 18:03
















  • $begingroup$
    What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 17:47










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:50







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 18:03















$begingroup$
What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
$endgroup$
– hjf
Jun 9 at 17:47




$begingroup$
What about these? tme.com/ar/es/details/li05-1a85/reles-electromagn-de-lengueta/… they are inexpensive reed relays, rated for 4KV
$endgroup$
– hjf
Jun 9 at 17:47












$begingroup$
@hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
Jun 9 at 17:50





$begingroup$
@hjf What voltage are your present relay contacts rated at?
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
Jun 9 at 17:50





1




1




$begingroup$
Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
$endgroup$
– hjf
Jun 9 at 18:03




$begingroup$
Just regular "ice cube" no-name chinese relays with generic specs. probably 250V.
$endgroup$
– hjf
Jun 9 at 18:03













1












$begingroup$

Your suspicion is justified. Voltage increases (and current decreases) as you move toward the open-circuited end of the antenna. The most common solution is to situate the loading coil - and, perhaps, a resonating capacitor - at the base of the antenna. A base-loaded vertical only 5m tall will not be very efficient on 80m, but a center-loaded antenna will probably not be great either, as it's only about 1/4 the length of a resonant monopole.



The voltage along the 5m radiator can be reduced and efficiency can be improved by effectively lengthening the radiator with "top hat" conductors. This will increase the current at the top of your 5m aluminum pipe and, depending on the size of the top hat, reduce the amount of inductive loading you need to add.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 16:30










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:31










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
    $endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    Jun 9 at 18:37











  • $begingroup$
    @BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 21:18















1












$begingroup$

Your suspicion is justified. Voltage increases (and current decreases) as you move toward the open-circuited end of the antenna. The most common solution is to situate the loading coil - and, perhaps, a resonating capacitor - at the base of the antenna. A base-loaded vertical only 5m tall will not be very efficient on 80m, but a center-loaded antenna will probably not be great either, as it's only about 1/4 the length of a resonant monopole.



The voltage along the 5m radiator can be reduced and efficiency can be improved by effectively lengthening the radiator with "top hat" conductors. This will increase the current at the top of your 5m aluminum pipe and, depending on the size of the top hat, reduce the amount of inductive loading you need to add.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 16:30










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:31










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
    $endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    Jun 9 at 18:37











  • $begingroup$
    @BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 21:18













1












1








1





$begingroup$

Your suspicion is justified. Voltage increases (and current decreases) as you move toward the open-circuited end of the antenna. The most common solution is to situate the loading coil - and, perhaps, a resonating capacitor - at the base of the antenna. A base-loaded vertical only 5m tall will not be very efficient on 80m, but a center-loaded antenna will probably not be great either, as it's only about 1/4 the length of a resonant monopole.



The voltage along the 5m radiator can be reduced and efficiency can be improved by effectively lengthening the radiator with "top hat" conductors. This will increase the current at the top of your 5m aluminum pipe and, depending on the size of the top hat, reduce the amount of inductive loading you need to add.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Your suspicion is justified. Voltage increases (and current decreases) as you move toward the open-circuited end of the antenna. The most common solution is to situate the loading coil - and, perhaps, a resonating capacitor - at the base of the antenna. A base-loaded vertical only 5m tall will not be very efficient on 80m, but a center-loaded antenna will probably not be great either, as it's only about 1/4 the length of a resonant monopole.



The voltage along the 5m radiator can be reduced and efficiency can be improved by effectively lengthening the radiator with "top hat" conductors. This will increase the current at the top of your 5m aluminum pipe and, depending on the size of the top hat, reduce the amount of inductive loading you need to add.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jun 9 at 16:26









Brian K1LIBrian K1LI

3,3104 silver badges19 bronze badges




3,3104 silver badges19 bronze badges







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 16:30










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:31










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
    $endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    Jun 9 at 18:37











  • $begingroup$
    @BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 21:18












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
    $endgroup$
    – hjf
    Jun 9 at 16:30










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 17:31










  • $begingroup$
    @hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
    $endgroup$
    – Brian K1LI
    Jun 9 at 18:37











  • $begingroup$
    @BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Jun 9 at 21:18







1




1




$begingroup$
But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
$endgroup$
– hjf
Jun 9 at 16:30




$begingroup$
But a hatted 5M vertical won't tune in 20M, correct?
$endgroup$
– hjf
Jun 9 at 16:30












$begingroup$
@hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
Jun 9 at 17:31




$begingroup$
@hjf If it won't, disconnect it with a HV relay as suggested in my answer here.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
Jun 9 at 17:31












$begingroup$
@hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
$endgroup$
– Brian K1LI
Jun 9 at 18:37





$begingroup$
@hjf Since you have to add compensating reactance, you might decide to make the system resonant on 40m and "tune" it on 20m and 80m. The permutations of lengths and loading are endless!
$endgroup$
– Brian K1LI
Jun 9 at 18:37













$begingroup$
@BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
Jun 9 at 21:18




$begingroup$
@BrianK1LI Added that link you your comment. ;-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
Jun 9 at 21:18

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f14682%2fmultiband-vertical-antenna-not-working-as-expected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company