802.1Q VLAN Tagged Vs Untagged Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Same native and tagged vlan possible on Redhat?What happens when an untagged frame is sent to a multiple untagged VLANs port?What happens when a consumer switch receives a VLAN-tagged Ethernet frame?TAGGED and UNTAGGED VLANSSetting up untagged VLAN on GE-24F4GBWOpenWrt Configuring Tagged and Untagged VLAN on the Same PortVMWare vSwitch VLAN IDs and tagged/untagged portsWhat do switches do to tagged and untagged VLAN packets?Is there any way to configure a vlan interface on linux to only receive the untagged frames?Tagged and Untagged Cisco vLAN port
Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?
What's called a person who works as someone who puts products on shelves in stores?
Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?
Putting Ant-Man on house arrest
Like totally amazing interchangeable sister outfit accessory swapping or whatever
A journey... into the MIND
Philosophers who were composers?
Will temporary Dex penalties prevent you from getting the benefits of the "Two Weapon Fighting" feat if your Dex score falls below the prerequisite?
Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?
How was Lagrange appointed professor of mathematics so early?
Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?
Why do people think Winterfell crypts is the safest place for women, children & old people?
Is it OK if I do not take the receipt in Germany?
Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?
Test if all elements of a Foldable are the same
Could a cockatrice have parasitic embryos?
How to keep bees out of canned beverages?
false 'Security alert' from Google - every login generates mails from 'no-reply@accounts.google.com'
When does Bran Stark remember Jamie pushing him?
What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?
In search of the origins of term censor, I hit a dead end stuck with the greek term, to censor, λογοκρίνω
Determinant of a matrix with 2 equal rows
Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?
How would it unbalance gameplay to rule that Weapon Master allows for picking a fighting style?
802.1Q VLAN Tagged Vs Untagged
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Same native and tagged vlan possible on Redhat?What happens when an untagged frame is sent to a multiple untagged VLANs port?What happens when a consumer switch receives a VLAN-tagged Ethernet frame?TAGGED and UNTAGGED VLANSSetting up untagged VLAN on GE-24F4GBWOpenWrt Configuring Tagged and Untagged VLAN on the Same PortVMWare vSwitch VLAN IDs and tagged/untagged portsWhat do switches do to tagged and untagged VLAN packets?Is there any way to configure a vlan interface on linux to only receive the untagged frames?Tagged and Untagged Cisco vLAN port
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
If I have a port A which has say VPID 200, has VLAN 200 untagged and also VLAN 150 untagged, does that mean that frames on the switch tagged 150 can reach port A, and open a connection, but port A cannot go find IPs/MACs on VLAN 150?
I haven't seen this discussed in detail, but does this create 1 way VLANs in a sense?
vlan
New contributor
add a comment |
If I have a port A which has say VPID 200, has VLAN 200 untagged and also VLAN 150 untagged, does that mean that frames on the switch tagged 150 can reach port A, and open a connection, but port A cannot go find IPs/MACs on VLAN 150?
I haven't seen this discussed in detail, but does this create 1 way VLANs in a sense?
vlan
New contributor
add a comment |
If I have a port A which has say VPID 200, has VLAN 200 untagged and also VLAN 150 untagged, does that mean that frames on the switch tagged 150 can reach port A, and open a connection, but port A cannot go find IPs/MACs on VLAN 150?
I haven't seen this discussed in detail, but does this create 1 way VLANs in a sense?
vlan
New contributor
If I have a port A which has say VPID 200, has VLAN 200 untagged and also VLAN 150 untagged, does that mean that frames on the switch tagged 150 can reach port A, and open a connection, but port A cannot go find IPs/MACs on VLAN 150?
I haven't seen this discussed in detail, but does this create 1 way VLANs in a sense?
vlan
vlan
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Apr 17 at 11:03
BringleBringle
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
In principle you can have only one untagged VLAN. This vlan may be called differently based on the brand but all the time it is pointing the same status. You are pointing trunk mode but there is allowed just single one native / default / untagged VLAN.
The configuration should not allow you to set more untagged VLANs and in case you could set it up that way the "last set" wins the selection so my guess is highest VLAN "win competition" about native VLAN ;-).
Available port modes:
Access mode
You can use one and only this one VLAN on the port and this VLAN is in principle untagged. This mode is used normally for connecting end nodes.
Trunk mode
This mode is when there is possible to communicate using more VLANs where one is default / native / untagged (all not tagged traffic is "assigned" to this VLAN). ALL the rest allowed VLANs have to be tagged. Based on the configuration you can allow / limit communication just for listed VLANs or you can allow all known VLANs on the device to go via the trunk port.
I understand that you can only have 1 VPID, for untagged packets entering a switch port, but I haven't found (or perhaps understood) an explanation regarding multiple untagged VLANs on a port, which I have found to be possible on both TP-Link and Mikrotik switch configs..
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 11:52
It is just not possible. In case you can set it up (somehow) you just rewriting the previous set so at then end there is again just one set native VLAN (untagged). So as there cannot be multiple untagged VLANs you just can't find the explanation for that ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:39
In case you would not set it up (on some device it is not shown in config as it is default) the VLAN 1 is set up se default. The way how to get "other" native VLAN on the port (in one direction) could be port mirroring but it is other topic... For normal communication the situation you are asking for can't happen - one thing is what you see in configuration and other thing is how the device behave ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:45
In this image i.imgur.com/oj4Nukw.png you can see how a port (for example an 'access' port) can have multiple untagged VLANS, for both TP-Link and Mikrotik
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 22:39
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Bringle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f963449%2f802-1q-vlan-tagged-vs-untagged%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In principle you can have only one untagged VLAN. This vlan may be called differently based on the brand but all the time it is pointing the same status. You are pointing trunk mode but there is allowed just single one native / default / untagged VLAN.
The configuration should not allow you to set more untagged VLANs and in case you could set it up that way the "last set" wins the selection so my guess is highest VLAN "win competition" about native VLAN ;-).
Available port modes:
Access mode
You can use one and only this one VLAN on the port and this VLAN is in principle untagged. This mode is used normally for connecting end nodes.
Trunk mode
This mode is when there is possible to communicate using more VLANs where one is default / native / untagged (all not tagged traffic is "assigned" to this VLAN). ALL the rest allowed VLANs have to be tagged. Based on the configuration you can allow / limit communication just for listed VLANs or you can allow all known VLANs on the device to go via the trunk port.
I understand that you can only have 1 VPID, for untagged packets entering a switch port, but I haven't found (or perhaps understood) an explanation regarding multiple untagged VLANs on a port, which I have found to be possible on both TP-Link and Mikrotik switch configs..
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 11:52
It is just not possible. In case you can set it up (somehow) you just rewriting the previous set so at then end there is again just one set native VLAN (untagged). So as there cannot be multiple untagged VLANs you just can't find the explanation for that ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:39
In case you would not set it up (on some device it is not shown in config as it is default) the VLAN 1 is set up se default. The way how to get "other" native VLAN on the port (in one direction) could be port mirroring but it is other topic... For normal communication the situation you are asking for can't happen - one thing is what you see in configuration and other thing is how the device behave ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:45
In this image i.imgur.com/oj4Nukw.png you can see how a port (for example an 'access' port) can have multiple untagged VLANS, for both TP-Link and Mikrotik
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 22:39
add a comment |
In principle you can have only one untagged VLAN. This vlan may be called differently based on the brand but all the time it is pointing the same status. You are pointing trunk mode but there is allowed just single one native / default / untagged VLAN.
The configuration should not allow you to set more untagged VLANs and in case you could set it up that way the "last set" wins the selection so my guess is highest VLAN "win competition" about native VLAN ;-).
Available port modes:
Access mode
You can use one and only this one VLAN on the port and this VLAN is in principle untagged. This mode is used normally for connecting end nodes.
Trunk mode
This mode is when there is possible to communicate using more VLANs where one is default / native / untagged (all not tagged traffic is "assigned" to this VLAN). ALL the rest allowed VLANs have to be tagged. Based on the configuration you can allow / limit communication just for listed VLANs or you can allow all known VLANs on the device to go via the trunk port.
I understand that you can only have 1 VPID, for untagged packets entering a switch port, but I haven't found (or perhaps understood) an explanation regarding multiple untagged VLANs on a port, which I have found to be possible on both TP-Link and Mikrotik switch configs..
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 11:52
It is just not possible. In case you can set it up (somehow) you just rewriting the previous set so at then end there is again just one set native VLAN (untagged). So as there cannot be multiple untagged VLANs you just can't find the explanation for that ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:39
In case you would not set it up (on some device it is not shown in config as it is default) the VLAN 1 is set up se default. The way how to get "other" native VLAN on the port (in one direction) could be port mirroring but it is other topic... For normal communication the situation you are asking for can't happen - one thing is what you see in configuration and other thing is how the device behave ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:45
In this image i.imgur.com/oj4Nukw.png you can see how a port (for example an 'access' port) can have multiple untagged VLANS, for both TP-Link and Mikrotik
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 22:39
add a comment |
In principle you can have only one untagged VLAN. This vlan may be called differently based on the brand but all the time it is pointing the same status. You are pointing trunk mode but there is allowed just single one native / default / untagged VLAN.
The configuration should not allow you to set more untagged VLANs and in case you could set it up that way the "last set" wins the selection so my guess is highest VLAN "win competition" about native VLAN ;-).
Available port modes:
Access mode
You can use one and only this one VLAN on the port and this VLAN is in principle untagged. This mode is used normally for connecting end nodes.
Trunk mode
This mode is when there is possible to communicate using more VLANs where one is default / native / untagged (all not tagged traffic is "assigned" to this VLAN). ALL the rest allowed VLANs have to be tagged. Based on the configuration you can allow / limit communication just for listed VLANs or you can allow all known VLANs on the device to go via the trunk port.
In principle you can have only one untagged VLAN. This vlan may be called differently based on the brand but all the time it is pointing the same status. You are pointing trunk mode but there is allowed just single one native / default / untagged VLAN.
The configuration should not allow you to set more untagged VLANs and in case you could set it up that way the "last set" wins the selection so my guess is highest VLAN "win competition" about native VLAN ;-).
Available port modes:
Access mode
You can use one and only this one VLAN on the port and this VLAN is in principle untagged. This mode is used normally for connecting end nodes.
Trunk mode
This mode is when there is possible to communicate using more VLANs where one is default / native / untagged (all not tagged traffic is "assigned" to this VLAN). ALL the rest allowed VLANs have to be tagged. Based on the configuration you can allow / limit communication just for listed VLANs or you can allow all known VLANs on the device to go via the trunk port.
answered Apr 17 at 11:44
Kamil JKamil J
4626
4626
I understand that you can only have 1 VPID, for untagged packets entering a switch port, but I haven't found (or perhaps understood) an explanation regarding multiple untagged VLANs on a port, which I have found to be possible on both TP-Link and Mikrotik switch configs..
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 11:52
It is just not possible. In case you can set it up (somehow) you just rewriting the previous set so at then end there is again just one set native VLAN (untagged). So as there cannot be multiple untagged VLANs you just can't find the explanation for that ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:39
In case you would not set it up (on some device it is not shown in config as it is default) the VLAN 1 is set up se default. The way how to get "other" native VLAN on the port (in one direction) could be port mirroring but it is other topic... For normal communication the situation you are asking for can't happen - one thing is what you see in configuration and other thing is how the device behave ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:45
In this image i.imgur.com/oj4Nukw.png you can see how a port (for example an 'access' port) can have multiple untagged VLANS, for both TP-Link and Mikrotik
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 22:39
add a comment |
I understand that you can only have 1 VPID, for untagged packets entering a switch port, but I haven't found (or perhaps understood) an explanation regarding multiple untagged VLANs on a port, which I have found to be possible on both TP-Link and Mikrotik switch configs..
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 11:52
It is just not possible. In case you can set it up (somehow) you just rewriting the previous set so at then end there is again just one set native VLAN (untagged). So as there cannot be multiple untagged VLANs you just can't find the explanation for that ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:39
In case you would not set it up (on some device it is not shown in config as it is default) the VLAN 1 is set up se default. The way how to get "other" native VLAN on the port (in one direction) could be port mirroring but it is other topic... For normal communication the situation you are asking for can't happen - one thing is what you see in configuration and other thing is how the device behave ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:45
In this image i.imgur.com/oj4Nukw.png you can see how a port (for example an 'access' port) can have multiple untagged VLANS, for both TP-Link and Mikrotik
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 22:39
I understand that you can only have 1 VPID, for untagged packets entering a switch port, but I haven't found (or perhaps understood) an explanation regarding multiple untagged VLANs on a port, which I have found to be possible on both TP-Link and Mikrotik switch configs..
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 11:52
I understand that you can only have 1 VPID, for untagged packets entering a switch port, but I haven't found (or perhaps understood) an explanation regarding multiple untagged VLANs on a port, which I have found to be possible on both TP-Link and Mikrotik switch configs..
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 11:52
It is just not possible. In case you can set it up (somehow) you just rewriting the previous set so at then end there is again just one set native VLAN (untagged). So as there cannot be multiple untagged VLANs you just can't find the explanation for that ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:39
It is just not possible. In case you can set it up (somehow) you just rewriting the previous set so at then end there is again just one set native VLAN (untagged). So as there cannot be multiple untagged VLANs you just can't find the explanation for that ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:39
In case you would not set it up (on some device it is not shown in config as it is default) the VLAN 1 is set up se default. The way how to get "other" native VLAN on the port (in one direction) could be port mirroring but it is other topic... For normal communication the situation you are asking for can't happen - one thing is what you see in configuration and other thing is how the device behave ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:45
In case you would not set it up (on some device it is not shown in config as it is default) the VLAN 1 is set up se default. The way how to get "other" native VLAN on the port (in one direction) could be port mirroring but it is other topic... For normal communication the situation you are asking for can't happen - one thing is what you see in configuration and other thing is how the device behave ;-).
– Kamil J
Apr 17 at 12:45
In this image i.imgur.com/oj4Nukw.png you can see how a port (for example an 'access' port) can have multiple untagged VLANS, for both TP-Link and Mikrotik
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 22:39
In this image i.imgur.com/oj4Nukw.png you can see how a port (for example an 'access' port) can have multiple untagged VLANS, for both TP-Link and Mikrotik
– Bringle
Apr 17 at 22:39
add a comment |
Bringle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bringle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bringle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bringle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f963449%2f802-1q-vlan-tagged-vs-untagged%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown