Install Language Pack On Windows Server Core (2012 R2) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!How can I deploy Language Packs to Windows 7 Enterprise domain clients using WSUS?How do I install dotNet Framework 3.51 on Windows Server 2012 core?How to handle updates that aren't appropriate for Server Core editions?Approvals Inheritance for WSUS on windows server 2012 R2unattend file not working with any language packUnable to install .NET Framework 4.6 on Windows Server 2012 R2 CoreApplication localization problems in english windows server 2012Windows Server 2012 R2 Server Core - source files could not be downloaded regardless of source specifiedConvert Windows Server 2016 Desktop Experience to CoreNo recent Windows updates showing as applicable in WSUS

Problem when applying foreach loop

Estimate capacitor parameters

Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?

Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?

How to rotate it perfectly?

Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?

If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"

What items from the Roman-age tech-level could be used to deter all creatures from entering a small area?

Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?

Slither Like a Snake

Blender game recording at the wrong time

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

What can I do if my MacBook isn’t charging but already ran out?

What do you call the holes in a flute?

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

Cauchy Sequence Characterized only By Directly Neighbouring Sequence Members

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Choo-choo! Word trains

Passing functions in C++

Can I add database to AWS RDS MySQL without creating new instance?

Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?



Install Language Pack On Windows Server Core (2012 R2)



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!How can I deploy Language Packs to Windows 7 Enterprise domain clients using WSUS?How do I install dotNet Framework 3.51 on Windows Server 2012 core?How to handle updates that aren't appropriate for Server Core editions?Approvals Inheritance for WSUS on windows server 2012 R2unattend file not working with any language packUnable to install .NET Framework 4.6 on Windows Server 2012 R2 CoreApplication localization problems in english windows server 2012Windows Server 2012 R2 Server Core - source files could not be downloaded regardless of source specifiedConvert Windows Server 2016 Desktop Experience to CoreNo recent Windows updates showing as applicable in WSUS



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I have language packs KB3012997 and KB2839636 staged and approved in Windows Server Update Services 2012 R2, but my Windows Server Core 2012 R2 clients refuse to install it. After googling the issue, it appears that these language pack updates are unable to be installed via WSUS, and have to be manually installed on the clients via the Language Control Panel. Unfortunately the Language Control Panel is not available on the Core edition of Windows server, both control.exe input.dll and control.exe /name Microsoft.Language do not work. I've tried installing the CAB files manually with dism /online /Add-Package /Package-Name:E:WsusContent65F1C5505C26603C0E907DEDD5A4B3A0E6511E44C65.cab but the updates are not registered as being installed in the WSUS console.



How can I go about getting these language packs installed on Server Core 2012 R2? Yes I know these language packs do little to nothing on Server Core. And that I could work around this issue by creating separate groups in the WSUS console for the Core and non-Core editions of Windows Server, and approving these updates only for the non-Core editions. But to satisfy my autism i'd like to get these updates installed anyways, because if they really were never intended to target Core editions of Windows Server, i'm assuming the WSUS console wouldn't say my Core servers are applicable for them. Right now the only way I can think of is using a tool like Altiris RapidInstall or Sysinternals Process Monitor to see what file/registry changes are made while adding a language pack on a non-Core edition of Windows Server, after it has already been installed with dism.exe and then applying these changes to the Core edition servers.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    You might see if this helps: technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc766472(v=ws.10).aspx That article makes me think that if a core build doesn't have Intlcfg.exe, then language packs will be useless. Also, I wouldn't assume that the WSUS console has accurate knowledge of what updates should be applied in all cases. It wouldn't be the first problem/mistake with a Microsoft tool by a long shot.

    – Todd Wilcox
    May 31 '16 at 19:09

















0















I have language packs KB3012997 and KB2839636 staged and approved in Windows Server Update Services 2012 R2, but my Windows Server Core 2012 R2 clients refuse to install it. After googling the issue, it appears that these language pack updates are unable to be installed via WSUS, and have to be manually installed on the clients via the Language Control Panel. Unfortunately the Language Control Panel is not available on the Core edition of Windows server, both control.exe input.dll and control.exe /name Microsoft.Language do not work. I've tried installing the CAB files manually with dism /online /Add-Package /Package-Name:E:WsusContent65F1C5505C26603C0E907DEDD5A4B3A0E6511E44C65.cab but the updates are not registered as being installed in the WSUS console.



How can I go about getting these language packs installed on Server Core 2012 R2? Yes I know these language packs do little to nothing on Server Core. And that I could work around this issue by creating separate groups in the WSUS console for the Core and non-Core editions of Windows Server, and approving these updates only for the non-Core editions. But to satisfy my autism i'd like to get these updates installed anyways, because if they really were never intended to target Core editions of Windows Server, i'm assuming the WSUS console wouldn't say my Core servers are applicable for them. Right now the only way I can think of is using a tool like Altiris RapidInstall or Sysinternals Process Monitor to see what file/registry changes are made while adding a language pack on a non-Core edition of Windows Server, after it has already been installed with dism.exe and then applying these changes to the Core edition servers.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    You might see if this helps: technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc766472(v=ws.10).aspx That article makes me think that if a core build doesn't have Intlcfg.exe, then language packs will be useless. Also, I wouldn't assume that the WSUS console has accurate knowledge of what updates should be applied in all cases. It wouldn't be the first problem/mistake with a Microsoft tool by a long shot.

    – Todd Wilcox
    May 31 '16 at 19:09













0












0








0








I have language packs KB3012997 and KB2839636 staged and approved in Windows Server Update Services 2012 R2, but my Windows Server Core 2012 R2 clients refuse to install it. After googling the issue, it appears that these language pack updates are unable to be installed via WSUS, and have to be manually installed on the clients via the Language Control Panel. Unfortunately the Language Control Panel is not available on the Core edition of Windows server, both control.exe input.dll and control.exe /name Microsoft.Language do not work. I've tried installing the CAB files manually with dism /online /Add-Package /Package-Name:E:WsusContent65F1C5505C26603C0E907DEDD5A4B3A0E6511E44C65.cab but the updates are not registered as being installed in the WSUS console.



How can I go about getting these language packs installed on Server Core 2012 R2? Yes I know these language packs do little to nothing on Server Core. And that I could work around this issue by creating separate groups in the WSUS console for the Core and non-Core editions of Windows Server, and approving these updates only for the non-Core editions. But to satisfy my autism i'd like to get these updates installed anyways, because if they really were never intended to target Core editions of Windows Server, i'm assuming the WSUS console wouldn't say my Core servers are applicable for them. Right now the only way I can think of is using a tool like Altiris RapidInstall or Sysinternals Process Monitor to see what file/registry changes are made while adding a language pack on a non-Core edition of Windows Server, after it has already been installed with dism.exe and then applying these changes to the Core edition servers.










share|improve this question














I have language packs KB3012997 and KB2839636 staged and approved in Windows Server Update Services 2012 R2, but my Windows Server Core 2012 R2 clients refuse to install it. After googling the issue, it appears that these language pack updates are unable to be installed via WSUS, and have to be manually installed on the clients via the Language Control Panel. Unfortunately the Language Control Panel is not available on the Core edition of Windows server, both control.exe input.dll and control.exe /name Microsoft.Language do not work. I've tried installing the CAB files manually with dism /online /Add-Package /Package-Name:E:WsusContent65F1C5505C26603C0E907DEDD5A4B3A0E6511E44C65.cab but the updates are not registered as being installed in the WSUS console.



How can I go about getting these language packs installed on Server Core 2012 R2? Yes I know these language packs do little to nothing on Server Core. And that I could work around this issue by creating separate groups in the WSUS console for the Core and non-Core editions of Windows Server, and approving these updates only for the non-Core editions. But to satisfy my autism i'd like to get these updates installed anyways, because if they really were never intended to target Core editions of Windows Server, i'm assuming the WSUS console wouldn't say my Core servers are applicable for them. Right now the only way I can think of is using a tool like Altiris RapidInstall or Sysinternals Process Monitor to see what file/registry changes are made while adding a language pack on a non-Core edition of Windows Server, after it has already been installed with dism.exe and then applying these changes to the Core edition servers.







windows-server-2012 windows-server-2012-r2 windows-server-core language-packs






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 31 '16 at 17:35









MattMatt

222211




222211







  • 1





    You might see if this helps: technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc766472(v=ws.10).aspx That article makes me think that if a core build doesn't have Intlcfg.exe, then language packs will be useless. Also, I wouldn't assume that the WSUS console has accurate knowledge of what updates should be applied in all cases. It wouldn't be the first problem/mistake with a Microsoft tool by a long shot.

    – Todd Wilcox
    May 31 '16 at 19:09












  • 1





    You might see if this helps: technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc766472(v=ws.10).aspx That article makes me think that if a core build doesn't have Intlcfg.exe, then language packs will be useless. Also, I wouldn't assume that the WSUS console has accurate knowledge of what updates should be applied in all cases. It wouldn't be the first problem/mistake with a Microsoft tool by a long shot.

    – Todd Wilcox
    May 31 '16 at 19:09







1




1





You might see if this helps: technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc766472(v=ws.10).aspx That article makes me think that if a core build doesn't have Intlcfg.exe, then language packs will be useless. Also, I wouldn't assume that the WSUS console has accurate knowledge of what updates should be applied in all cases. It wouldn't be the first problem/mistake with a Microsoft tool by a long shot.

– Todd Wilcox
May 31 '16 at 19:09





You might see if this helps: technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc766472(v=ws.10).aspx That article makes me think that if a core build doesn't have Intlcfg.exe, then language packs will be useless. Also, I wouldn't assume that the WSUS console has accurate knowledge of what updates should be applied in all cases. It wouldn't be the first problem/mistake with a Microsoft tool by a long shot.

– Todd Wilcox
May 31 '16 at 19:09










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














This is working as designed. It is a "feature" / "defect" of WSUS exposed by a select group of "updates" that are not in fact updates in the typical meaning of the term.



Certain WSUS updates including language packs are detected as applicable to a machine in the sense that they may optionally be installed manually by some mechanism outside of Windows Update. By approving the update you are making the update available to be downloaded from WSUS however this does not actually trigger any automatic download or installation. It is necessary to trigger the update through another tool such as the Control Panel language settings.



In addition to language packs various dynamic installers have similar functionality for similar reasons. The dynamic installers are downloaded from WSUS at the time that an installation is run, but are not in fact updates for the system upon which the installation is being run (they update the installer, not the system). They will not register as installed because they do not get installed onto the system, and may be downloaded multiple times if the installer is run multiple times.



This is working as designed, so it is a "feature" that WSUS is able to provide the files from a content delivery system under administrative control and presumably caching/delivering the content closer to the client.



This is fundamentally different from the typical expected behaviour of WSUS, so it is arguably a design "defect" that WSUS handles optional components including language packs in a completely different manor from the vast majority of updates which will automatically be installed by Windows Update.



To install on server core the DISM or LPKSETUP commands can be used.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825679.aspx
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825178.aspx






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "2"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f780078%2finstall-language-pack-on-windows-server-core-2012-r2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    This is working as designed. It is a "feature" / "defect" of WSUS exposed by a select group of "updates" that are not in fact updates in the typical meaning of the term.



    Certain WSUS updates including language packs are detected as applicable to a machine in the sense that they may optionally be installed manually by some mechanism outside of Windows Update. By approving the update you are making the update available to be downloaded from WSUS however this does not actually trigger any automatic download or installation. It is necessary to trigger the update through another tool such as the Control Panel language settings.



    In addition to language packs various dynamic installers have similar functionality for similar reasons. The dynamic installers are downloaded from WSUS at the time that an installation is run, but are not in fact updates for the system upon which the installation is being run (they update the installer, not the system). They will not register as installed because they do not get installed onto the system, and may be downloaded multiple times if the installer is run multiple times.



    This is working as designed, so it is a "feature" that WSUS is able to provide the files from a content delivery system under administrative control and presumably caching/delivering the content closer to the client.



    This is fundamentally different from the typical expected behaviour of WSUS, so it is arguably a design "defect" that WSUS handles optional components including language packs in a completely different manor from the vast majority of updates which will automatically be installed by Windows Update.



    To install on server core the DISM or LPKSETUP commands can be used.
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825679.aspx
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825178.aspx






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      This is working as designed. It is a "feature" / "defect" of WSUS exposed by a select group of "updates" that are not in fact updates in the typical meaning of the term.



      Certain WSUS updates including language packs are detected as applicable to a machine in the sense that they may optionally be installed manually by some mechanism outside of Windows Update. By approving the update you are making the update available to be downloaded from WSUS however this does not actually trigger any automatic download or installation. It is necessary to trigger the update through another tool such as the Control Panel language settings.



      In addition to language packs various dynamic installers have similar functionality for similar reasons. The dynamic installers are downloaded from WSUS at the time that an installation is run, but are not in fact updates for the system upon which the installation is being run (they update the installer, not the system). They will not register as installed because they do not get installed onto the system, and may be downloaded multiple times if the installer is run multiple times.



      This is working as designed, so it is a "feature" that WSUS is able to provide the files from a content delivery system under administrative control and presumably caching/delivering the content closer to the client.



      This is fundamentally different from the typical expected behaviour of WSUS, so it is arguably a design "defect" that WSUS handles optional components including language packs in a completely different manor from the vast majority of updates which will automatically be installed by Windows Update.



      To install on server core the DISM or LPKSETUP commands can be used.
      https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825679.aspx
      https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825178.aspx






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        This is working as designed. It is a "feature" / "defect" of WSUS exposed by a select group of "updates" that are not in fact updates in the typical meaning of the term.



        Certain WSUS updates including language packs are detected as applicable to a machine in the sense that they may optionally be installed manually by some mechanism outside of Windows Update. By approving the update you are making the update available to be downloaded from WSUS however this does not actually trigger any automatic download or installation. It is necessary to trigger the update through another tool such as the Control Panel language settings.



        In addition to language packs various dynamic installers have similar functionality for similar reasons. The dynamic installers are downloaded from WSUS at the time that an installation is run, but are not in fact updates for the system upon which the installation is being run (they update the installer, not the system). They will not register as installed because they do not get installed onto the system, and may be downloaded multiple times if the installer is run multiple times.



        This is working as designed, so it is a "feature" that WSUS is able to provide the files from a content delivery system under administrative control and presumably caching/delivering the content closer to the client.



        This is fundamentally different from the typical expected behaviour of WSUS, so it is arguably a design "defect" that WSUS handles optional components including language packs in a completely different manor from the vast majority of updates which will automatically be installed by Windows Update.



        To install on server core the DISM or LPKSETUP commands can be used.
        https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825679.aspx
        https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825178.aspx






        share|improve this answer













        This is working as designed. It is a "feature" / "defect" of WSUS exposed by a select group of "updates" that are not in fact updates in the typical meaning of the term.



        Certain WSUS updates including language packs are detected as applicable to a machine in the sense that they may optionally be installed manually by some mechanism outside of Windows Update. By approving the update you are making the update available to be downloaded from WSUS however this does not actually trigger any automatic download or installation. It is necessary to trigger the update through another tool such as the Control Panel language settings.



        In addition to language packs various dynamic installers have similar functionality for similar reasons. The dynamic installers are downloaded from WSUS at the time that an installation is run, but are not in fact updates for the system upon which the installation is being run (they update the installer, not the system). They will not register as installed because they do not get installed onto the system, and may be downloaded multiple times if the installer is run multiple times.



        This is working as designed, so it is a "feature" that WSUS is able to provide the files from a content delivery system under administrative control and presumably caching/delivering the content closer to the client.



        This is fundamentally different from the typical expected behaviour of WSUS, so it is arguably a design "defect" that WSUS handles optional components including language packs in a completely different manor from the vast majority of updates which will automatically be installed by Windows Update.



        To install on server core the DISM or LPKSETUP commands can be used.
        https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825679.aspx
        https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825178.aspx







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Oct 13 '17 at 5:01









        DougDoug

        1466




        1466



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f780078%2finstall-language-pack-on-windows-server-core-2012-r2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020