Upgrading kernel on debian 8 Jessie Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Problem upgrading kernel on debian 3.1update from debian lenny to squeezeCompile Kernel Debian SqueezeLinode Kernel HeadersDebian 8 Jessie - Docker can't run ImageWhy am I having issues upgrading the kernel on a fresh Ubuntu 16.04 installation?Cannot install openjdk-8-jre-headless on Debian JessieDebian Jessie Kernel won't install, could be a grub2 issue?What is the recommended method of installing an arbitrary version of a package using apt?Upgrading from Debian 8 (Jessie) to 9 (Stretch)

Irreducible of finite Krull dimension implies quasi-compact?

Why are the trig functions versine, haversine, exsecant, etc, rarely used in modern mathematics?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

また usage in a dictionary

How to show element name in portuguese using elements package?

Does classifying an integer as a discrete log require it be part of a multiplicative group?

What is the meaning of the simile “quick as silk”?

How to convince students of the implication truth values?

Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?

Can melee weapons be used to deliver Contact Poisons?

Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?

What is the longest distance a player character can jump in one leap?

Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?

Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?

How to Make a Beautiful Stacked 3D Plot

How do I make this wiring inside cabinet safer? (Pic)

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?

Circuit to "zoom in" on mV fluctuations of a DC signal?



Upgrading kernel on debian 8 Jessie



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Problem upgrading kernel on debian 3.1update from debian lenny to squeezeCompile Kernel Debian SqueezeLinode Kernel HeadersDebian 8 Jessie - Docker can't run ImageWhy am I having issues upgrading the kernel on a fresh Ubuntu 16.04 installation?Cannot install openjdk-8-jre-headless on Debian JessieDebian Jessie Kernel won't install, could be a grub2 issue?What is the recommended method of installing an arbitrary version of a package using apt?Upgrading from Debian 8 (Jessie) to 9 (Stretch)



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















I have a Debian 8 Jessie server, and I'd like to upgrade my kernel to at least version 4, in order to use overlay fs with Docker.



My current kernel is:



$ uname -r
3.16.0-4-amd64


I followed a guide which stated to add the backports repository to the /etc/apt/sources.list file. I added this line:



deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main


I did an apt-get update and this is now the output of apt-cache search linux-image:



linux-headers-3.16.0-4-amd64 - Header files for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 - Linux 3.16 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-image-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package)
linux-image-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux amd64 configuration (meta-package)
nvidia-kernel-3.16.0-4-amd64 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-headers-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
linux-headers-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64
linux-headers-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
linux-headers-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT
linux-headers-4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, Grsecurity protection
linux-image-grsec-amd64 - Linux image meta-package, grsec featureset
linux-image-rt-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package), PREEMPT_RT
linux-image-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux rt-amd64 configuration (meta-package)
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT (signed)
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT (signed)


The guide said to continue with



sudo apt-get install linux-image-amd64/jessie-backports


I did it, and I got this output:



$ sudo apt-get install linux-image-amd64/jessie-backports

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Selected version '4.9+78~bpo8+1' (Debian Backports:jessie-backports [amd64]) for 'linux-image-amd64'
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
linux-image-amd64 : Depends: linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


What should I do from here? Should I explicitly install linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 instead of linux-image-amd64? If yes, should I install other packages along with it?



p.s. Does installing a new kernel automatically remove the older one or do I have to remove the older one manually?










share|improve this question






















  • Can you maybe try to fix first the unmet dependencies with askubuntu.com/questions/140246/… ?

    – Tolsadus
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:39











  • @Tolsadus But the unmet dependencies came when I added that repo, so I think it is causing the issue. That's why I'm asking what should I do...

    – BackSlash
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:46











  • @Tolsadus In fact I can install any software, it is just the kernel update that fails with that message

    – BackSlash
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:48






  • 1





    It's perfectly fine to remove linux-image-amd64 (which is just a meta-package) and install a particular image. Not using the meta-package means you must explicitely upgrade your kernel next time. You'll have to remove the old one manually (unless you want both, for debugging/safety purposes). apt-get -t target_release often helps to sort out dependencies.

    – dirkt
    Feb 15 '17 at 18:56

















1















I have a Debian 8 Jessie server, and I'd like to upgrade my kernel to at least version 4, in order to use overlay fs with Docker.



My current kernel is:



$ uname -r
3.16.0-4-amd64


I followed a guide which stated to add the backports repository to the /etc/apt/sources.list file. I added this line:



deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main


I did an apt-get update and this is now the output of apt-cache search linux-image:



linux-headers-3.16.0-4-amd64 - Header files for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 - Linux 3.16 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-image-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package)
linux-image-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux amd64 configuration (meta-package)
nvidia-kernel-3.16.0-4-amd64 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-headers-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
linux-headers-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64
linux-headers-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
linux-headers-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT
linux-headers-4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, Grsecurity protection
linux-image-grsec-amd64 - Linux image meta-package, grsec featureset
linux-image-rt-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package), PREEMPT_RT
linux-image-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux rt-amd64 configuration (meta-package)
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT (signed)
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT (signed)


The guide said to continue with



sudo apt-get install linux-image-amd64/jessie-backports


I did it, and I got this output:



$ sudo apt-get install linux-image-amd64/jessie-backports

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Selected version '4.9+78~bpo8+1' (Debian Backports:jessie-backports [amd64]) for 'linux-image-amd64'
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
linux-image-amd64 : Depends: linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


What should I do from here? Should I explicitly install linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 instead of linux-image-amd64? If yes, should I install other packages along with it?



p.s. Does installing a new kernel automatically remove the older one or do I have to remove the older one manually?










share|improve this question






















  • Can you maybe try to fix first the unmet dependencies with askubuntu.com/questions/140246/… ?

    – Tolsadus
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:39











  • @Tolsadus But the unmet dependencies came when I added that repo, so I think it is causing the issue. That's why I'm asking what should I do...

    – BackSlash
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:46











  • @Tolsadus In fact I can install any software, it is just the kernel update that fails with that message

    – BackSlash
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:48






  • 1





    It's perfectly fine to remove linux-image-amd64 (which is just a meta-package) and install a particular image. Not using the meta-package means you must explicitely upgrade your kernel next time. You'll have to remove the old one manually (unless you want both, for debugging/safety purposes). apt-get -t target_release often helps to sort out dependencies.

    – dirkt
    Feb 15 '17 at 18:56













1












1








1








I have a Debian 8 Jessie server, and I'd like to upgrade my kernel to at least version 4, in order to use overlay fs with Docker.



My current kernel is:



$ uname -r
3.16.0-4-amd64


I followed a guide which stated to add the backports repository to the /etc/apt/sources.list file. I added this line:



deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main


I did an apt-get update and this is now the output of apt-cache search linux-image:



linux-headers-3.16.0-4-amd64 - Header files for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 - Linux 3.16 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-image-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package)
linux-image-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux amd64 configuration (meta-package)
nvidia-kernel-3.16.0-4-amd64 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-headers-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
linux-headers-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64
linux-headers-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
linux-headers-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT
linux-headers-4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, Grsecurity protection
linux-image-grsec-amd64 - Linux image meta-package, grsec featureset
linux-image-rt-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package), PREEMPT_RT
linux-image-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux rt-amd64 configuration (meta-package)
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT (signed)
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT (signed)


The guide said to continue with



sudo apt-get install linux-image-amd64/jessie-backports


I did it, and I got this output:



$ sudo apt-get install linux-image-amd64/jessie-backports

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Selected version '4.9+78~bpo8+1' (Debian Backports:jessie-backports [amd64]) for 'linux-image-amd64'
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
linux-image-amd64 : Depends: linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


What should I do from here? Should I explicitly install linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 instead of linux-image-amd64? If yes, should I install other packages along with it?



p.s. Does installing a new kernel automatically remove the older one or do I have to remove the older one manually?










share|improve this question














I have a Debian 8 Jessie server, and I'd like to upgrade my kernel to at least version 4, in order to use overlay fs with Docker.



My current kernel is:



$ uname -r
3.16.0-4-amd64


I followed a guide which stated to add the backports repository to the /etc/apt/sources.list file. I added this line:



deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main


I did an apt-get update and this is now the output of apt-cache search linux-image:



linux-headers-3.16.0-4-amd64 - Header files for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 - Linux 3.16 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-image-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package)
linux-image-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux amd64 configuration (meta-package)
nvidia-kernel-3.16.0-4-amd64 - NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
linux-headers-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
linux-headers-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64
linux-headers-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
linux-headers-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT
linux-headers-4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64 - Header files for Linux 4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64
linux-image-4.8.0-2-grsec-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, Grsecurity protection
linux-image-grsec-amd64 - Linux image meta-package, grsec featureset
linux-image-rt-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package), PREEMPT_RT
linux-image-rt-amd64-dbg - Debugging symbols for Linux rt-amd64 configuration (meta-package)
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
linux-image-4.8.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 - Linux 4.8 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT (signed)
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 - Linux 4.9 for 64-bit PCs, PREEMPT_RT (signed)


The guide said to continue with



sudo apt-get install linux-image-amd64/jessie-backports


I did it, and I got this output:



$ sudo apt-get install linux-image-amd64/jessie-backports

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Selected version '4.9+78~bpo8+1' (Debian Backports:jessie-backports [amd64]) for 'linux-image-amd64'
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
linux-image-amd64 : Depends: linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


What should I do from here? Should I explicitly install linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64 instead of linux-image-amd64? If yes, should I install other packages along with it?



p.s. Does installing a new kernel automatically remove the older one or do I have to remove the older one manually?







debian docker kernel linux-kernel debian-jessie






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 15 '17 at 14:57









BackSlashBackSlash

11115




11115












  • Can you maybe try to fix first the unmet dependencies with askubuntu.com/questions/140246/… ?

    – Tolsadus
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:39











  • @Tolsadus But the unmet dependencies came when I added that repo, so I think it is causing the issue. That's why I'm asking what should I do...

    – BackSlash
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:46











  • @Tolsadus In fact I can install any software, it is just the kernel update that fails with that message

    – BackSlash
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:48






  • 1





    It's perfectly fine to remove linux-image-amd64 (which is just a meta-package) and install a particular image. Not using the meta-package means you must explicitely upgrade your kernel next time. You'll have to remove the old one manually (unless you want both, for debugging/safety purposes). apt-get -t target_release often helps to sort out dependencies.

    – dirkt
    Feb 15 '17 at 18:56

















  • Can you maybe try to fix first the unmet dependencies with askubuntu.com/questions/140246/… ?

    – Tolsadus
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:39











  • @Tolsadus But the unmet dependencies came when I added that repo, so I think it is causing the issue. That's why I'm asking what should I do...

    – BackSlash
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:46











  • @Tolsadus In fact I can install any software, it is just the kernel update that fails with that message

    – BackSlash
    Feb 15 '17 at 16:48






  • 1





    It's perfectly fine to remove linux-image-amd64 (which is just a meta-package) and install a particular image. Not using the meta-package means you must explicitely upgrade your kernel next time. You'll have to remove the old one manually (unless you want both, for debugging/safety purposes). apt-get -t target_release often helps to sort out dependencies.

    – dirkt
    Feb 15 '17 at 18:56
















Can you maybe try to fix first the unmet dependencies with askubuntu.com/questions/140246/… ?

– Tolsadus
Feb 15 '17 at 16:39





Can you maybe try to fix first the unmet dependencies with askubuntu.com/questions/140246/… ?

– Tolsadus
Feb 15 '17 at 16:39













@Tolsadus But the unmet dependencies came when I added that repo, so I think it is causing the issue. That's why I'm asking what should I do...

– BackSlash
Feb 15 '17 at 16:46





@Tolsadus But the unmet dependencies came when I added that repo, so I think it is causing the issue. That's why I'm asking what should I do...

– BackSlash
Feb 15 '17 at 16:46













@Tolsadus In fact I can install any software, it is just the kernel update that fails with that message

– BackSlash
Feb 15 '17 at 16:48





@Tolsadus In fact I can install any software, it is just the kernel update that fails with that message

– BackSlash
Feb 15 '17 at 16:48




1




1





It's perfectly fine to remove linux-image-amd64 (which is just a meta-package) and install a particular image. Not using the meta-package means you must explicitely upgrade your kernel next time. You'll have to remove the old one manually (unless you want both, for debugging/safety purposes). apt-get -t target_release often helps to sort out dependencies.

– dirkt
Feb 15 '17 at 18:56





It's perfectly fine to remove linux-image-amd64 (which is just a meta-package) and install a particular image. Not using the meta-package means you must explicitely upgrade your kernel next time. You'll have to remove the old one manually (unless you want both, for debugging/safety purposes). apt-get -t target_release often helps to sort out dependencies.

– dirkt
Feb 15 '17 at 18:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I switched to the backport kernel for the same reason as you (docker). The backport kernel has dependencies on packages which are installed already, but not in a version that the backport kernel needs. The newer versions are also available in the backports repository. However, apt-get will not install dependencies automatically from the backports repo (unless configured to do so). In other words, you need to install the dependencies explicitly, together with the backport kernel.



The dependencies are



  • linux-base (I am sure about that)

  • kmod

  • initramfs-tools





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "2"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f832713%2fupgrading-kernel-on-debian-8-jessie%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I switched to the backport kernel for the same reason as you (docker). The backport kernel has dependencies on packages which are installed already, but not in a version that the backport kernel needs. The newer versions are also available in the backports repository. However, apt-get will not install dependencies automatically from the backports repo (unless configured to do so). In other words, you need to install the dependencies explicitly, together with the backport kernel.



    The dependencies are



    • linux-base (I am sure about that)

    • kmod

    • initramfs-tools





    share|improve this answer



























      0














      I switched to the backport kernel for the same reason as you (docker). The backport kernel has dependencies on packages which are installed already, but not in a version that the backport kernel needs. The newer versions are also available in the backports repository. However, apt-get will not install dependencies automatically from the backports repo (unless configured to do so). In other words, you need to install the dependencies explicitly, together with the backport kernel.



      The dependencies are



      • linux-base (I am sure about that)

      • kmod

      • initramfs-tools





      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        I switched to the backport kernel for the same reason as you (docker). The backport kernel has dependencies on packages which are installed already, but not in a version that the backport kernel needs. The newer versions are also available in the backports repository. However, apt-get will not install dependencies automatically from the backports repo (unless configured to do so). In other words, you need to install the dependencies explicitly, together with the backport kernel.



        The dependencies are



        • linux-base (I am sure about that)

        • kmod

        • initramfs-tools





        share|improve this answer













        I switched to the backport kernel for the same reason as you (docker). The backport kernel has dependencies on packages which are installed already, but not in a version that the backport kernel needs. The newer versions are also available in the backports repository. However, apt-get will not install dependencies automatically from the backports repo (unless configured to do so). In other words, you need to install the dependencies explicitly, together with the backport kernel.



        The dependencies are



        • linux-base (I am sure about that)

        • kmod

        • initramfs-tools






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Feb 22 '17 at 8:05









        user415594user415594

        1




        1



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f832713%2fupgrading-kernel-on-debian-8-jessie%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020