HAProxy track_script + nopreempt not workingKeepalived not honoring nopreemptkeepalived nopreempt option not workingMake keepalived send 0 priority when going to FAULT statekeepalived track_script doesn't seem to runKeepalived unwanted transition to masterkeepalived VRRP_script not failing overHAProxy stats page not workingHAProxy don't balancing requests between nodes of Galera clusterkeepalived failover downtimeWhy doesn't keepalived track_script restart keepalived when HAProxy drops out?

How to test if argument is a single space?

Three knights or knaves, three different hair colors

What defines a person who is circumcised "of the heart"?

What is the required burn to keep a satellite at a Lagrangian point?

Shell builtin `printf` line limit?

Sony VAIO Duo 13 Wifi not working on Ubuntu 16.04

How can I reduce the size of matrix?

Anatomically correct Guivre

VHDL: Why is it hard to desgin a floating point unit in hardware?

Why do testers need root cause analysis?

mmap: effect of other processes writing to a file previously mapped read-only

Is there a word for pant sleeves?

Is it normal to "extract a paper" from a master thesis?

Is being an extrovert a necessary condition to be a manager?

Keeping the dodos out of the field

Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand

Can someone provide me the list of SOQL exceptions?

Meaning of "half-crown enclosure"

Find this Unique UVC Palindrome ( ignoring signs and decimal) from Given Fractional Relationship

Is ideal gas incompressible?

Is there any mention of ghosts who live outside the Hogwarts castle?

How would a physicist explain this starship engine?

Can diplomats be allowed on the flight deck of a commercial European airline?

Is a world with one country feeding everyone possible?



HAProxy track_script + nopreempt not working


Keepalived not honoring nopreemptkeepalived nopreempt option not workingMake keepalived send 0 priority when going to FAULT statekeepalived track_script doesn't seem to runKeepalived unwanted transition to masterkeepalived VRRP_script not failing overHAProxy stats page not workingHAProxy don't balancing requests between nodes of Galera clusterkeepalived failover downtimeWhy doesn't keepalived track_script restart keepalived when HAProxy drops out?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















I have 2 nodes with Keepalived v1.2.13, in Amazon AWS VPC.



I'm trying to achieve this scenario, assuming Node1 is MASTER:

If I stop HAProxy or stop keepalived or stop the node, failover to Node2.

If I start HAProxy back up on Node1 or start keepalived or start the node, do not failover to Node1 (no flapping).



With the following configuration, only by stopping keepalived or stopping the node, does the failover works. The priority change due to the track_script doesn't seem to affect the MASTER election.



Node1



vrrp_script chk_haproxy # Requires keepalived-1.1.13
script "killall -0 haproxy" # cheaper than pidof
interval 2 # check every 2 seconds
fall 2
weight 2 # add 2 points of prio if OK


vrrp_instance VI_1
advert_int 2
state BACKUP
nopreempt
interface eth0
virtual_router_id 51
priority 101
unicast_peer
172.17.16.10


notify_master "/etc/keepalived/randomscript.sh"
track_script
chk_haproxy




Node2



vrrp_script chk_haproxy # Requires keepalived-1.1.13
script "killall -0 haproxy" # cheaper than pidof
interval 2 # check every 2 seconds
fall 2
weight 2 # add 2 points of prio if OK


vrrp_instance VI_1
advert_int 2
state BACKUP
nopreempt
interface eth0
virtual_router_id 51
priority 100
unicast_peer
172.17.16.11


notify_master "/etc/keepalived/randomscript.sh"
track_script
chk_haproxy











share|improve this question
























  • I also tried on both nodes : state EQUAL, priority 100. This cause a race condition when both instances are booting at the same time, both transition to MASTER, execute the randomscript.sh, and 4-5 seconds after that one node transition to BACKUP, but I don't want the script to be executed.

    – Bastien974
    Apr 23 '15 at 12:52











  • migrate your cluster to pacemaker

    – c4f4t0r
    Jan 8 at 12:34

















1















I have 2 nodes with Keepalived v1.2.13, in Amazon AWS VPC.



I'm trying to achieve this scenario, assuming Node1 is MASTER:

If I stop HAProxy or stop keepalived or stop the node, failover to Node2.

If I start HAProxy back up on Node1 or start keepalived or start the node, do not failover to Node1 (no flapping).



With the following configuration, only by stopping keepalived or stopping the node, does the failover works. The priority change due to the track_script doesn't seem to affect the MASTER election.



Node1



vrrp_script chk_haproxy # Requires keepalived-1.1.13
script "killall -0 haproxy" # cheaper than pidof
interval 2 # check every 2 seconds
fall 2
weight 2 # add 2 points of prio if OK


vrrp_instance VI_1
advert_int 2
state BACKUP
nopreempt
interface eth0
virtual_router_id 51
priority 101
unicast_peer
172.17.16.10


notify_master "/etc/keepalived/randomscript.sh"
track_script
chk_haproxy




Node2



vrrp_script chk_haproxy # Requires keepalived-1.1.13
script "killall -0 haproxy" # cheaper than pidof
interval 2 # check every 2 seconds
fall 2
weight 2 # add 2 points of prio if OK


vrrp_instance VI_1
advert_int 2
state BACKUP
nopreempt
interface eth0
virtual_router_id 51
priority 100
unicast_peer
172.17.16.11


notify_master "/etc/keepalived/randomscript.sh"
track_script
chk_haproxy











share|improve this question
























  • I also tried on both nodes : state EQUAL, priority 100. This cause a race condition when both instances are booting at the same time, both transition to MASTER, execute the randomscript.sh, and 4-5 seconds after that one node transition to BACKUP, but I don't want the script to be executed.

    – Bastien974
    Apr 23 '15 at 12:52











  • migrate your cluster to pacemaker

    – c4f4t0r
    Jan 8 at 12:34













1












1








1


1






I have 2 nodes with Keepalived v1.2.13, in Amazon AWS VPC.



I'm trying to achieve this scenario, assuming Node1 is MASTER:

If I stop HAProxy or stop keepalived or stop the node, failover to Node2.

If I start HAProxy back up on Node1 or start keepalived or start the node, do not failover to Node1 (no flapping).



With the following configuration, only by stopping keepalived or stopping the node, does the failover works. The priority change due to the track_script doesn't seem to affect the MASTER election.



Node1



vrrp_script chk_haproxy # Requires keepalived-1.1.13
script "killall -0 haproxy" # cheaper than pidof
interval 2 # check every 2 seconds
fall 2
weight 2 # add 2 points of prio if OK


vrrp_instance VI_1
advert_int 2
state BACKUP
nopreempt
interface eth0
virtual_router_id 51
priority 101
unicast_peer
172.17.16.10


notify_master "/etc/keepalived/randomscript.sh"
track_script
chk_haproxy




Node2



vrrp_script chk_haproxy # Requires keepalived-1.1.13
script "killall -0 haproxy" # cheaper than pidof
interval 2 # check every 2 seconds
fall 2
weight 2 # add 2 points of prio if OK


vrrp_instance VI_1
advert_int 2
state BACKUP
nopreempt
interface eth0
virtual_router_id 51
priority 100
unicast_peer
172.17.16.11


notify_master "/etc/keepalived/randomscript.sh"
track_script
chk_haproxy











share|improve this question
















I have 2 nodes with Keepalived v1.2.13, in Amazon AWS VPC.



I'm trying to achieve this scenario, assuming Node1 is MASTER:

If I stop HAProxy or stop keepalived or stop the node, failover to Node2.

If I start HAProxy back up on Node1 or start keepalived or start the node, do not failover to Node1 (no flapping).



With the following configuration, only by stopping keepalived or stopping the node, does the failover works. The priority change due to the track_script doesn't seem to affect the MASTER election.



Node1



vrrp_script chk_haproxy # Requires keepalived-1.1.13
script "killall -0 haproxy" # cheaper than pidof
interval 2 # check every 2 seconds
fall 2
weight 2 # add 2 points of prio if OK


vrrp_instance VI_1
advert_int 2
state BACKUP
nopreempt
interface eth0
virtual_router_id 51
priority 101
unicast_peer
172.17.16.10


notify_master "/etc/keepalived/randomscript.sh"
track_script
chk_haproxy




Node2



vrrp_script chk_haproxy # Requires keepalived-1.1.13
script "killall -0 haproxy" # cheaper than pidof
interval 2 # check every 2 seconds
fall 2
weight 2 # add 2 points of prio if OK


vrrp_instance VI_1
advert_int 2
state BACKUP
nopreempt
interface eth0
virtual_router_id 51
priority 100
unicast_peer
172.17.16.11


notify_master "/etc/keepalived/randomscript.sh"
track_script
chk_haproxy








haproxy keepalived






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 23 '15 at 15:48







Bastien974

















asked Apr 22 '15 at 22:49









Bastien974Bastien974

84493153




84493153












  • I also tried on both nodes : state EQUAL, priority 100. This cause a race condition when both instances are booting at the same time, both transition to MASTER, execute the randomscript.sh, and 4-5 seconds after that one node transition to BACKUP, but I don't want the script to be executed.

    – Bastien974
    Apr 23 '15 at 12:52











  • migrate your cluster to pacemaker

    – c4f4t0r
    Jan 8 at 12:34

















  • I also tried on both nodes : state EQUAL, priority 100. This cause a race condition when both instances are booting at the same time, both transition to MASTER, execute the randomscript.sh, and 4-5 seconds after that one node transition to BACKUP, but I don't want the script to be executed.

    – Bastien974
    Apr 23 '15 at 12:52











  • migrate your cluster to pacemaker

    – c4f4t0r
    Jan 8 at 12:34
















I also tried on both nodes : state EQUAL, priority 100. This cause a race condition when both instances are booting at the same time, both transition to MASTER, execute the randomscript.sh, and 4-5 seconds after that one node transition to BACKUP, but I don't want the script to be executed.

– Bastien974
Apr 23 '15 at 12:52





I also tried on both nodes : state EQUAL, priority 100. This cause a race condition when both instances are booting at the same time, both transition to MASTER, execute the randomscript.sh, and 4-5 seconds after that one node transition to BACKUP, but I don't want the script to be executed.

– Bastien974
Apr 23 '15 at 12:52













migrate your cluster to pacemaker

– c4f4t0r
Jan 8 at 12:34





migrate your cluster to pacemaker

– c4f4t0r
Jan 8 at 12:34










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I ended up using on both nodes :



state EQUAL
priority 100


The race condition was due to some kind of issue with the security group of the instances. So this is an issue specific to AWS.



For an unknown reason, VRRP Unicast works even though not explicitly allowed in the security group. I explicitly opened it (Custom Protocol 112) and it fixed the issue. It seems like it takes time to allow the packet during the initialization of a stack.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "2"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f684836%2fhaproxy-track-script-nopreempt-not-working%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I ended up using on both nodes :



    state EQUAL
    priority 100


    The race condition was due to some kind of issue with the security group of the instances. So this is an issue specific to AWS.



    For an unknown reason, VRRP Unicast works even though not explicitly allowed in the security group. I explicitly opened it (Custom Protocol 112) and it fixed the issue. It seems like it takes time to allow the packet during the initialization of a stack.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      I ended up using on both nodes :



      state EQUAL
      priority 100


      The race condition was due to some kind of issue with the security group of the instances. So this is an issue specific to AWS.



      For an unknown reason, VRRP Unicast works even though not explicitly allowed in the security group. I explicitly opened it (Custom Protocol 112) and it fixed the issue. It seems like it takes time to allow the packet during the initialization of a stack.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        I ended up using on both nodes :



        state EQUAL
        priority 100


        The race condition was due to some kind of issue with the security group of the instances. So this is an issue specific to AWS.



        For an unknown reason, VRRP Unicast works even though not explicitly allowed in the security group. I explicitly opened it (Custom Protocol 112) and it fixed the issue. It seems like it takes time to allow the packet during the initialization of a stack.






        share|improve this answer













        I ended up using on both nodes :



        state EQUAL
        priority 100


        The race condition was due to some kind of issue with the security group of the instances. So this is an issue specific to AWS.



        For an unknown reason, VRRP Unicast works even though not explicitly allowed in the security group. I explicitly opened it (Custom Protocol 112) and it fixed the issue. It seems like it takes time to allow the packet during the initialization of a stack.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 23 '15 at 17:48









        Bastien974Bastien974

        84493153




        84493153



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f684836%2fhaproxy-track-script-nopreempt-not-working%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020