How is the many-to-one function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ be decreasing?Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?many to one functionsHow to show that functions of this type are strictly decreasingHow to determine if this function is one-to-oneHow many times does the function $y=x+sin^2left(frac x3right)-3$ cross the x-axis?How to find the range of a function $y=frac(x-1)(x+4)(x-2)(x-3)$Having trouble finding the domain of this function?How to determine the new domain and range given the old domain and range?I got a question on whether the function is one-one or many-one and onto or into .Problem in finding whether function is one-one or many-oneprincipal root confusion

Can 2 light bulbs of 120V in series be used on 230V AC?

Why does snapping your fingers activate the Infinity Gauntlet?

Why are Marine Le Pen's possible connections with Steve Bannon something worth investigating?

How was the blinking terminal cursor invented?

Warped chessboard

Germany rejected my entry to Schengen countries

How come Arya Stark wasn't hurt by this in Game of Thrones Season 8 Episode 5?

Can the word crowd refer to just 10 people?

Very serious stuff - Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"

Can anyone provide me info what this is?

Have I found a major security issue with login

Expand a hexagon

Is being an extrovert a necessary condition to be a manager?

Is it a good idea to teach algorithm courses using pseudocode instead of a real programming language?

Is the free group on two generators generated by two elements?

Why would Thor need to strike a building with lightning to attack enemies?

Bash - Execute two commands and get exit status 1 if first fails

Does the Aboleth have expertise in history and perception?

Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand

Is my company merging branches wrong?

Would a "ring language" be possible?

What is the backup for a glass cockpit, if a plane loses power to the displays/controls?

FIFO data structure in pure C

Greek theta instead of lower case þ (Icelandic) in TexStudio



How is the many-to-one function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ be decreasing?


Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?many to one functionsHow to show that functions of this type are strictly decreasingHow to determine if this function is one-to-oneHow many times does the function $y=x+sin^2left(frac x3right)-3$ cross the x-axis?How to find the range of a function $y=frac(x-1)(x+4)(x-2)(x-3)$Having trouble finding the domain of this function?How to determine the new domain and range given the old domain and range?I got a question on whether the function is one-one or many-one and onto or into .Problem in finding whether function is one-one or many-oneprincipal root confusion













3












$begingroup$


The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Umm... "my book"?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 2:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
    $endgroup$
    – Hema
    May 7 at 3:00










  • $begingroup$
    You DID mention it... that's the problem!
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 3:34















3












$begingroup$


The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Umm... "my book"?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 2:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
    $endgroup$
    – Hema
    May 7 at 3:00










  • $begingroup$
    You DID mention it... that's the problem!
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 3:34













3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?







functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited May 7 at 8:39









YuiTo Cheng

3,25371245




3,25371245










asked May 7 at 1:59









HemaHema

6731314




6731314







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Umm... "my book"?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 2:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
    $endgroup$
    – Hema
    May 7 at 3:00










  • $begingroup$
    You DID mention it... that's the problem!
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 3:34












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Umm... "my book"?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 2:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
    $endgroup$
    – Hema
    May 7 at 3:00










  • $begingroup$
    You DID mention it... that's the problem!
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 3:34







1




1




$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 2:03




$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 2:03












$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
May 7 at 3:00




$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
May 7 at 3:00












$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 3:34




$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 3:34










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.



By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.




By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:42










  • $begingroup$
    You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 12:07


















2












$begingroup$

It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 2:13










  • $begingroup$
    The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:43


















1












$begingroup$

If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3216622%2fhow-is-the-many-to-one-function-fx-frac1x-1-frac2x-2-frac3%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.



    By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.




    By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:42










    • $begingroup$
      You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 12:07















    5












    $begingroup$

    When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.



    By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.




    By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:42










    • $begingroup$
      You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 12:07













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.



    By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.




    By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.



    By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.




    By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited May 8 at 0:18

























    answered May 7 at 2:17









    雨が好きな人雨が好きな人

    2,065417




    2,065417











    • $begingroup$
      The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:42










    • $begingroup$
      You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 12:07
















    • $begingroup$
      The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:42










    • $begingroup$
      You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 12:07















    $begingroup$
    The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:42




    $begingroup$
    The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:42












    $begingroup$
    You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 12:07




    $begingroup$
    You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 12:07











    2












    $begingroup$

    It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 2:13










    • $begingroup$
      The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:43















    2












    $begingroup$

    It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 2:13










    • $begingroup$
      The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:43













    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered May 7 at 2:09









    BartekBartek

    3439




    3439







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 2:13










    • $begingroup$
      The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:43












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 2:13










    • $begingroup$
      The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:43







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 2:13




    $begingroup$
    Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 2:13












    $begingroup$
    The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:43




    $begingroup$
    The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:43











    1












    $begingroup$

    If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered May 7 at 10:45









        Michael HoppeMichael Hoppe

        11.4k31837




        11.4k31837



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3216622%2fhow-is-the-many-to-one-function-fx-frac1x-1-frac2x-2-frac3%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020