How is the many-to-one function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ be decreasing?Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?many to one functionsHow to show that functions of this type are strictly decreasingHow to determine if this function is one-to-oneHow many times does the function $y=x+sin^2left(frac x3right)-3$ cross the x-axis?How to find the range of a function $y=frac(x-1)(x+4)(x-2)(x-3)$Having trouble finding the domain of this function?How to determine the new domain and range given the old domain and range?I got a question on whether the function is one-one or many-one and onto or into .Problem in finding whether function is one-one or many-oneprincipal root confusion
Can 2 light bulbs of 120V in series be used on 230V AC?
Why does snapping your fingers activate the Infinity Gauntlet?
Why are Marine Le Pen's possible connections with Steve Bannon something worth investigating?
How was the blinking terminal cursor invented?
Warped chessboard
Germany rejected my entry to Schengen countries
How come Arya Stark wasn't hurt by this in Game of Thrones Season 8 Episode 5?
Can the word crowd refer to just 10 people?
Very serious stuff - Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"
Can anyone provide me info what this is?
Have I found a major security issue with login
Expand a hexagon
Is being an extrovert a necessary condition to be a manager?
Is it a good idea to teach algorithm courses using pseudocode instead of a real programming language?
Is the free group on two generators generated by two elements?
Why would Thor need to strike a building with lightning to attack enemies?
Bash - Execute two commands and get exit status 1 if first fails
Does the Aboleth have expertise in history and perception?
Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand
Is my company merging branches wrong?
Would a "ring language" be possible?
What is the backup for a glass cockpit, if a plane loses power to the displays/controls?
FIFO data structure in pure C
Greek theta instead of lower case þ (Icelandic) in TexStudio
How is the many-to-one function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ be decreasing?
Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?many to one functionsHow to show that functions of this type are strictly decreasingHow to determine if this function is one-to-oneHow many times does the function $y=x+sin^2left(frac x3right)-3$ cross the x-axis?How to find the range of a function $y=frac(x-1)(x+4)(x-2)(x-3)$Having trouble finding the domain of this function?How to determine the new domain and range given the old domain and range?I got a question on whether the function is one-one or many-one and onto or into .Problem in finding whether function is one-one or many-oneprincipal root confusion
$begingroup$
The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?
functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?
functions
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 2:03
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
May 7 at 3:00
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 3:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?
functions
$endgroup$
The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?
functions
functions
edited May 7 at 8:39
YuiTo Cheng
3,25371245
3,25371245
asked May 7 at 1:59
HemaHema
6731314
6731314
1
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 2:03
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
May 7 at 3:00
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 3:34
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 2:03
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
May 7 at 3:00
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 3:34
1
1
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 2:03
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 2:03
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
May 7 at 3:00
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
May 7 at 3:00
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 3:34
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 3:34
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.
By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.
By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:42
$begingroup$
You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 12:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 2:13
$begingroup$
The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3216622%2fhow-is-the-many-to-one-function-fx-frac1x-1-frac2x-2-frac3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.
By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.
By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:42
$begingroup$
You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 12:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.
By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.
By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:42
$begingroup$
You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 12:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.
By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.
By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.
$endgroup$
When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.
By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.
By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.
edited May 8 at 0:18
answered May 7 at 2:17
雨が好きな人雨が好きな人
2,065417
2,065417
$begingroup$
The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:42
$begingroup$
You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 12:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:42
$begingroup$
You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 12:07
$begingroup$
The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:42
$begingroup$
The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:42
$begingroup$
You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 12:07
$begingroup$
You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 12:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 2:13
$begingroup$
The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 2:13
$begingroup$
The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.
$endgroup$
It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.
answered May 7 at 2:09
BartekBartek
3439
3439
1
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 2:13
$begingroup$
The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:43
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 2:13
$begingroup$
The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:43
1
1
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 2:13
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
May 7 at 2:13
$begingroup$
The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:43
$begingroup$
The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 7 at 10:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.
$endgroup$
If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.
answered May 7 at 10:45
Michael HoppeMichael Hoppe
11.4k31837
11.4k31837
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3216622%2fhow-is-the-many-to-one-function-fx-frac1x-1-frac2x-2-frac3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 2:03
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
May 7 at 3:00
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 3:34