How is the many-to-one function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ be decreasing?Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?many to one functionsHow to show that functions of this type are strictly decreasingHow to determine if this function is one-to-oneHow many times does the function $y=x+sin^2left(frac x3right)-3$ cross the x-axis?How to find the range of a function $y=frac(x-1)(x+4)(x-2)(x-3)$Having trouble finding the domain of this function?How to determine the new domain and range given the old domain and range?I got a question on whether the function is one-one or many-one and onto or into .Problem in finding whether function is one-one or many-oneprincipal root confusion

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Can 2 light bulbs of 120V in series be used on 230V AC?

Why does snapping your fingers activate the Infinity Gauntlet?

Why are Marine Le Pen's possible connections with Steve Bannon something worth investigating?

How was the blinking terminal cursor invented?

Warped chessboard

Germany rejected my entry to Schengen countries

How come Arya Stark wasn't hurt by this in Game of Thrones Season 8 Episode 5?

Can the word crowd refer to just 10 people?

Very serious stuff - Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"

Can anyone provide me info what this is?

Have I found a major security issue with login

Expand a hexagon

Is being an extrovert a necessary condition to be a manager?

Is it a good idea to teach algorithm courses using pseudocode instead of a real programming language?

Is the free group on two generators generated by two elements?

Why would Thor need to strike a building with lightning to attack enemies?

Bash - Execute two commands and get exit status 1 if first fails

Does the Aboleth have expertise in history and perception?

Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand

Is my company merging branches wrong?

Would a "ring language" be possible?

What is the backup for a glass cockpit, if a plane loses power to the displays/controls?

FIFO data structure in pure C

Greek theta instead of lower case þ (Icelandic) in TexStudio



How is the many-to-one function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ be decreasing?


Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?many to one functionsHow to show that functions of this type are strictly decreasingHow to determine if this function is one-to-oneHow many times does the function $y=x+sin^2left(frac x3right)-3$ cross the x-axis?How to find the range of a function $y=frac(x-1)(x+4)(x-2)(x-3)$Having trouble finding the domain of this function?How to determine the new domain and range given the old domain and range?I got a question on whether the function is one-one or many-one and onto or into .Problem in finding whether function is one-one or many-oneprincipal root confusion













3












$begingroup$


The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Umm... "my book"?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 2:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
    $endgroup$
    – Hema
    May 7 at 3:00










  • $begingroup$
    You DID mention it... that's the problem!
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 3:34















3












$begingroup$


The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Umm... "my book"?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 2:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
    $endgroup$
    – Hema
    May 7 at 3:00










  • $begingroup$
    You DID mention it... that's the problem!
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 3:34













3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?







functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited May 7 at 8:39









YuiTo Cheng

3,25371245




3,25371245










asked May 7 at 1:59









HemaHema

6731314




6731314







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Umm... "my book"?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 2:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
    $endgroup$
    – Hema
    May 7 at 3:00










  • $begingroup$
    You DID mention it... that's the problem!
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 3:34












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Umm... "my book"?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 2:03










  • $begingroup$
    @DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
    $endgroup$
    – Hema
    May 7 at 3:00










  • $begingroup$
    You DID mention it... that's the problem!
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    May 7 at 3:34







1




1




$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 2:03




$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 2:03












$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
May 7 at 3:00




$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
May 7 at 3:00












$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 3:34




$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
May 7 at 3:34










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.



By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.




By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:42










  • $begingroup$
    You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 12:07


















2












$begingroup$

It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 2:13










  • $begingroup$
    The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:43


















1












$begingroup$

If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3216622%2fhow-is-the-many-to-one-function-fx-frac1x-1-frac2x-2-frac3%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.



    By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.




    By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:42










    • $begingroup$
      You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 12:07















    5












    $begingroup$

    When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.



    By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.




    By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:42










    • $begingroup$
      You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 12:07













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.



    By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.




    By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.



    By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.




    By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited May 8 at 0:18

























    answered May 7 at 2:17









    雨が好きな人雨が好きな人

    2,065417




    2,065417











    • $begingroup$
      The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:42










    • $begingroup$
      You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 12:07
















    • $begingroup$
      The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:42










    • $begingroup$
      You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 12:07















    $begingroup$
    The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:42




    $begingroup$
    The function is continuous where it's defined, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/1482787/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:42












    $begingroup$
    You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 12:07




    $begingroup$
    You are right—of course. But I don’t think raising that issue here is going to do anyone any favours. My answer serves as a short, intuitive picture.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 12:07











    2












    $begingroup$

    It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 2:13










    • $begingroup$
      The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:43















    2












    $begingroup$

    It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 2:13










    • $begingroup$
      The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:43













    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered May 7 at 2:09









    BartekBartek

    3439




    3439







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 2:13










    • $begingroup$
      The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:43












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
      $endgroup$
      – 雨が好きな人
      May 7 at 2:13










    • $begingroup$
      The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      May 7 at 10:43







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 2:13




    $begingroup$
    Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
    $endgroup$
    – 雨が好きな人
    May 7 at 2:13












    $begingroup$
    The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:43




    $begingroup$
    The IVM demands also that the domain is an interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    May 7 at 10:43











    1












    $begingroup$

    If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If a $C^1$-function's derivative is negative then it's decreasing on any interval where it's defined.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered May 7 at 10:45









        Michael HoppeMichael Hoppe

        11.4k31837




        11.4k31837



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3216622%2fhow-is-the-many-to-one-function-fx-frac1x-1-frac2x-2-frac3%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            7z9vhU 105HRv hl9LsVi7kgdTalYqyoV2VO6vLZgY1,iIWg7MKMIwMkf1SFy3 gCnBpP8gUVX
            z4fia3s4 jSzh,GD l2dj0,UBd LFCu,h,EMKyzJUFbe6HvDVl3g,5hUZsiNaMO A0NVaqF2SWuonw3LNmm,6NnJusgQuEk,x9Upd

            Popular posts from this blog

            RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020