Sonicwall NSA2400 - No internet accessServer 2008 R2 DNS not resolving TLD'sOdd Site-to-site VPN connectivity issueUnable to ping or access internetSonicwall Enhanced With One-To-One NAT, Firewall Blocking EverythingSonicwall NSA 240, Configured for LAN and DMZ, X0 and X2 on same switch - ping issuesTwo email servers behind Sonicwall unable to communicate with each otherSonicwall NSA with ping/Internet to wakeWebsever behind Sonicwall, Gateway TimeoutDNS and PING failure - Windows 2003 DNS and SonicWall NSA240Installed a new Sonicwall at MPLS provider's DC, got it working by luck but have no idea WHY it's working like thisopenvpn client behind sonicwall can't see WAN

Why could the Lunar Ascent Engine be used only once?

Failing students when it might cause them economic ruin

Why aren't satellites disintegrated even though they orbit earth within earth's Roche Limits?

Vehemently against code formatting

How could the B-29 bomber back up under its own power?

How come Arya Stark wasn't hurt by this in Game of Thrones Season 8 Episode 5?

Easier way to draw a filled ellipse with top edge dashed and bottom edge solid?

Parse a C++14 integer literal

What should I wear to go and sign an employment contract?

Hotel booking: Why is Agoda much cheaper than booking.com?

Latin words remembered from high school 50 years ago

Can the word crowd refer to just 10 people?

Why didn't Daenerys' advisers suggest assassinating Cersei?

On a piano, are the effects of holding notes and the sustain pedal the same for a single chord?

How could Dwarves prevent sand from filling up their settlements

Greek theta instead of lower case þ (Icelandic) in TexStudio

Does the Aboleth have expertise in history and perception?

How do we explain the use of a software on a math paper?

How can I prevent Bash expansion from passing files starting with "-" as argument?

How to safely discharge oneself

Will this series of events work to drown the Tarrasque?

Head-internal relative clauses

Very serious stuff - Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"

Does science define life as "beginning at conception"?



Sonicwall NSA2400 - No internet access


Server 2008 R2 DNS not resolving TLD'sOdd Site-to-site VPN connectivity issueUnable to ping or access internetSonicwall Enhanced With One-To-One NAT, Firewall Blocking EverythingSonicwall NSA 240, Configured for LAN and DMZ, X0 and X2 on same switch - ping issuesTwo email servers behind Sonicwall unable to communicate with each otherSonicwall NSA with ping/Internet to wakeWebsever behind Sonicwall, Gateway TimeoutDNS and PING failure - Windows 2003 DNS and SonicWall NSA240Installed a new Sonicwall at MPLS provider's DC, got it working by luck but have no idea WHY it's working like thisopenvpn client behind sonicwall can't see WAN






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















We've got a SonicWall NSA2400 configured with a LAN (X0) and a WAN(X1) interface.
It was setup and working fine until just recently when a temporary worker changed some settings most likely NAT.



We can ping on the LAN just fine, we also have another FW setup that works just fine with internet connectivity so we know that's not the issue.
Pinging between the two firewalls work fine and also inbetween clients.



We have tried NAT rules that blows everything wide open, basically allow Any to Any with Any service and so forth. We cannot ping our ISP DNS either. We even tried adding the Google DNS (8.8.8.8) to no avail.



If I setup a computer with the WAN IP & DNS everything works fine, same as through other FW's.



I don't have much experience with SW FW's, what is interesting however is that if you ping out from a client. It is able to resolve the hostname to an IP, e.g.



Pinging yahoo.com [98.138.253.109] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Etc.



This works for ANY address/hostname we ping, it will resolve to IP then timeout.
Trying to go through a webpage to both hostname or IP and it won't connect.



Has anyone ran into a similar problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks in advance and best regards.



Tom










share|improve this question






















  • What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

    – KJ-SRS
    Aug 30 '12 at 19:51











  • I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

    – Travis
    Oct 4 '16 at 16:44












  • Can you expand with trace route ?

    – Timothy Frew
    Apr 24 '18 at 23:09

















1















We've got a SonicWall NSA2400 configured with a LAN (X0) and a WAN(X1) interface.
It was setup and working fine until just recently when a temporary worker changed some settings most likely NAT.



We can ping on the LAN just fine, we also have another FW setup that works just fine with internet connectivity so we know that's not the issue.
Pinging between the two firewalls work fine and also inbetween clients.



We have tried NAT rules that blows everything wide open, basically allow Any to Any with Any service and so forth. We cannot ping our ISP DNS either. We even tried adding the Google DNS (8.8.8.8) to no avail.



If I setup a computer with the WAN IP & DNS everything works fine, same as through other FW's.



I don't have much experience with SW FW's, what is interesting however is that if you ping out from a client. It is able to resolve the hostname to an IP, e.g.



Pinging yahoo.com [98.138.253.109] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Etc.



This works for ANY address/hostname we ping, it will resolve to IP then timeout.
Trying to go through a webpage to both hostname or IP and it won't connect.



Has anyone ran into a similar problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks in advance and best regards.



Tom










share|improve this question






















  • What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

    – KJ-SRS
    Aug 30 '12 at 19:51











  • I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

    – Travis
    Oct 4 '16 at 16:44












  • Can you expand with trace route ?

    – Timothy Frew
    Apr 24 '18 at 23:09













1












1








1








We've got a SonicWall NSA2400 configured with a LAN (X0) and a WAN(X1) interface.
It was setup and working fine until just recently when a temporary worker changed some settings most likely NAT.



We can ping on the LAN just fine, we also have another FW setup that works just fine with internet connectivity so we know that's not the issue.
Pinging between the two firewalls work fine and also inbetween clients.



We have tried NAT rules that blows everything wide open, basically allow Any to Any with Any service and so forth. We cannot ping our ISP DNS either. We even tried adding the Google DNS (8.8.8.8) to no avail.



If I setup a computer with the WAN IP & DNS everything works fine, same as through other FW's.



I don't have much experience with SW FW's, what is interesting however is that if you ping out from a client. It is able to resolve the hostname to an IP, e.g.



Pinging yahoo.com [98.138.253.109] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Etc.



This works for ANY address/hostname we ping, it will resolve to IP then timeout.
Trying to go through a webpage to both hostname or IP and it won't connect.



Has anyone ran into a similar problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks in advance and best regards.



Tom










share|improve this question














We've got a SonicWall NSA2400 configured with a LAN (X0) and a WAN(X1) interface.
It was setup and working fine until just recently when a temporary worker changed some settings most likely NAT.



We can ping on the LAN just fine, we also have another FW setup that works just fine with internet connectivity so we know that's not the issue.
Pinging between the two firewalls work fine and also inbetween clients.



We have tried NAT rules that blows everything wide open, basically allow Any to Any with Any service and so forth. We cannot ping our ISP DNS either. We even tried adding the Google DNS (8.8.8.8) to no avail.



If I setup a computer with the WAN IP & DNS everything works fine, same as through other FW's.



I don't have much experience with SW FW's, what is interesting however is that if you ping out from a client. It is able to resolve the hostname to an IP, e.g.



Pinging yahoo.com [98.138.253.109] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Etc.



This works for ANY address/hostname we ping, it will resolve to IP then timeout.
Trying to go through a webpage to both hostname or IP and it won't connect.



Has anyone ran into a similar problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks in advance and best regards.



Tom







domain-name-system firewall ping sonicwall






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 30 '12 at 17:40









Tom EricksonTom Erickson

612




612












  • What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

    – KJ-SRS
    Aug 30 '12 at 19:51











  • I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

    – Travis
    Oct 4 '16 at 16:44












  • Can you expand with trace route ?

    – Timothy Frew
    Apr 24 '18 at 23:09

















  • What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

    – KJ-SRS
    Aug 30 '12 at 19:51











  • I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

    – Travis
    Oct 4 '16 at 16:44












  • Can you expand with trace route ?

    – Timothy Frew
    Apr 24 '18 at 23:09
















What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

– KJ-SRS
Aug 30 '12 at 19:51





What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

– KJ-SRS
Aug 30 '12 at 19:51













I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

– Travis
Oct 4 '16 at 16:44






I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

– Travis
Oct 4 '16 at 16:44














Can you expand with trace route ?

– Timothy Frew
Apr 24 '18 at 23:09





Can you expand with trace route ?

– Timothy Frew
Apr 24 '18 at 23:09










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















0














This is a pretty vague question. Since you don't know what the temp worker changed, it's hard to tell you what to undo. Do you have a copy of the backup settings? That would be the easiest way to get back to a working config.



If not, honestly, the easiest way may be to reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigure. Before you do, write down all pertinent IPs, custom firewall and NAT rules, etc. The fact that you started adding a bunch of Any to Any NAT rules (without knowing what they do) is really going to mess things up.



Hope that helps






share|improve this answer






























    0














    Just the log and see if the firewall is dropping packets based on missing or "deny" rules. ifyou don't see anything in there, it might be a missing nat rule, but generally the outbound default rules take care of outbound traffic unless blocked by a firewall rule. Generally speaking though, by default LAN->WAN traffic allows all.






    share|improve this answer






























      0














      In Sonicwall firewalls, regardless of whether you have multiple internet providers or just one, you have to set at least one interface in the default LB group in Network > Failover & LB > Default LB Group, as shown in this screenshot:



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer






























        0














        Start with the logs. Don't go diving in changing the configuration straight off the bat, it usually makes things worse and you end up forgetting what you changed as well.



        Hopefully, by looking at the logs you should be able to identify what was changed. Failing that, can you see through the logs if the firewall is dropping/rejecting packets?



        The fact that you can resolve DNS suggests that your routing and NAT is in place (unless you are running an internal caching nameserver), but general traffic is being blocked. This sounds to me like a firewall rule gone wrong.



        Failing all of the above, take a backup of the system logs now so you can analyse them later, then just restore the system from a good backup. You should then analyse the logs of the 'broken' config to identify what was done.






        share|improve this answer























          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "2"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f422992%2fsonicwall-nsa2400-no-internet-access%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          This is a pretty vague question. Since you don't know what the temp worker changed, it's hard to tell you what to undo. Do you have a copy of the backup settings? That would be the easiest way to get back to a working config.



          If not, honestly, the easiest way may be to reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigure. Before you do, write down all pertinent IPs, custom firewall and NAT rules, etc. The fact that you started adding a bunch of Any to Any NAT rules (without knowing what they do) is really going to mess things up.



          Hope that helps






          share|improve this answer



























            0














            This is a pretty vague question. Since you don't know what the temp worker changed, it's hard to tell you what to undo. Do you have a copy of the backup settings? That would be the easiest way to get back to a working config.



            If not, honestly, the easiest way may be to reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigure. Before you do, write down all pertinent IPs, custom firewall and NAT rules, etc. The fact that you started adding a bunch of Any to Any NAT rules (without knowing what they do) is really going to mess things up.



            Hope that helps






            share|improve this answer

























              0












              0








              0







              This is a pretty vague question. Since you don't know what the temp worker changed, it's hard to tell you what to undo. Do you have a copy of the backup settings? That would be the easiest way to get back to a working config.



              If not, honestly, the easiest way may be to reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigure. Before you do, write down all pertinent IPs, custom firewall and NAT rules, etc. The fact that you started adding a bunch of Any to Any NAT rules (without knowing what they do) is really going to mess things up.



              Hope that helps






              share|improve this answer













              This is a pretty vague question. Since you don't know what the temp worker changed, it's hard to tell you what to undo. Do you have a copy of the backup settings? That would be the easiest way to get back to a working config.



              If not, honestly, the easiest way may be to reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigure. Before you do, write down all pertinent IPs, custom firewall and NAT rules, etc. The fact that you started adding a bunch of Any to Any NAT rules (without knowing what they do) is really going to mess things up.



              Hope that helps







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Aug 30 '12 at 17:57









              Jim G.Jim G.

              2,36711317




              2,36711317























                  0














                  Just the log and see if the firewall is dropping packets based on missing or "deny" rules. ifyou don't see anything in there, it might be a missing nat rule, but generally the outbound default rules take care of outbound traffic unless blocked by a firewall rule. Generally speaking though, by default LAN->WAN traffic allows all.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    0














                    Just the log and see if the firewall is dropping packets based on missing or "deny" rules. ifyou don't see anything in there, it might be a missing nat rule, but generally the outbound default rules take care of outbound traffic unless blocked by a firewall rule. Generally speaking though, by default LAN->WAN traffic allows all.






                    share|improve this answer

























                      0












                      0








                      0







                      Just the log and see if the firewall is dropping packets based on missing or "deny" rules. ifyou don't see anything in there, it might be a missing nat rule, but generally the outbound default rules take care of outbound traffic unless blocked by a firewall rule. Generally speaking though, by default LAN->WAN traffic allows all.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Just the log and see if the firewall is dropping packets based on missing or "deny" rules. ifyou don't see anything in there, it might be a missing nat rule, but generally the outbound default rules take care of outbound traffic unless blocked by a firewall rule. Generally speaking though, by default LAN->WAN traffic allows all.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Aug 30 '12 at 19:48









                      MikeAWoodMikeAWood

                      2,3811813




                      2,3811813





















                          0














                          In Sonicwall firewalls, regardless of whether you have multiple internet providers or just one, you have to set at least one interface in the default LB group in Network > Failover & LB > Default LB Group, as shown in this screenshot:



                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer



























                            0














                            In Sonicwall firewalls, regardless of whether you have multiple internet providers or just one, you have to set at least one interface in the default LB group in Network > Failover & LB > Default LB Group, as shown in this screenshot:



                            enter image description here






                            share|improve this answer

























                              0












                              0








                              0







                              In Sonicwall firewalls, regardless of whether you have multiple internet providers or just one, you have to set at least one interface in the default LB group in Network > Failover & LB > Default LB Group, as shown in this screenshot:



                              enter image description here






                              share|improve this answer













                              In Sonicwall firewalls, regardless of whether you have multiple internet providers or just one, you have to set at least one interface in the default LB group in Network > Failover & LB > Default LB Group, as shown in this screenshot:



                              enter image description here







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Jan 25 '14 at 23:40









                              Gabriel TalaveraGabriel Talavera

                              1,1971917




                              1,1971917





















                                  0














                                  Start with the logs. Don't go diving in changing the configuration straight off the bat, it usually makes things worse and you end up forgetting what you changed as well.



                                  Hopefully, by looking at the logs you should be able to identify what was changed. Failing that, can you see through the logs if the firewall is dropping/rejecting packets?



                                  The fact that you can resolve DNS suggests that your routing and NAT is in place (unless you are running an internal caching nameserver), but general traffic is being blocked. This sounds to me like a firewall rule gone wrong.



                                  Failing all of the above, take a backup of the system logs now so you can analyse them later, then just restore the system from a good backup. You should then analyse the logs of the 'broken' config to identify what was done.






                                  share|improve this answer



























                                    0














                                    Start with the logs. Don't go diving in changing the configuration straight off the bat, it usually makes things worse and you end up forgetting what you changed as well.



                                    Hopefully, by looking at the logs you should be able to identify what was changed. Failing that, can you see through the logs if the firewall is dropping/rejecting packets?



                                    The fact that you can resolve DNS suggests that your routing and NAT is in place (unless you are running an internal caching nameserver), but general traffic is being blocked. This sounds to me like a firewall rule gone wrong.



                                    Failing all of the above, take a backup of the system logs now so you can analyse them later, then just restore the system from a good backup. You should then analyse the logs of the 'broken' config to identify what was done.






                                    share|improve this answer

























                                      0












                                      0








                                      0







                                      Start with the logs. Don't go diving in changing the configuration straight off the bat, it usually makes things worse and you end up forgetting what you changed as well.



                                      Hopefully, by looking at the logs you should be able to identify what was changed. Failing that, can you see through the logs if the firewall is dropping/rejecting packets?



                                      The fact that you can resolve DNS suggests that your routing and NAT is in place (unless you are running an internal caching nameserver), but general traffic is being blocked. This sounds to me like a firewall rule gone wrong.



                                      Failing all of the above, take a backup of the system logs now so you can analyse them later, then just restore the system from a good backup. You should then analyse the logs of the 'broken' config to identify what was done.






                                      share|improve this answer













                                      Start with the logs. Don't go diving in changing the configuration straight off the bat, it usually makes things worse and you end up forgetting what you changed as well.



                                      Hopefully, by looking at the logs you should be able to identify what was changed. Failing that, can you see through the logs if the firewall is dropping/rejecting packets?



                                      The fact that you can resolve DNS suggests that your routing and NAT is in place (unless you are running an internal caching nameserver), but general traffic is being blocked. This sounds to me like a firewall rule gone wrong.



                                      Failing all of the above, take a backup of the system logs now so you can analyse them later, then just restore the system from a good backup. You should then analyse the logs of the 'broken' config to identify what was done.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Aug 17 '15 at 7:51









                                      tomstephens89tomstephens89

                                      661823




                                      661823



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f422992%2fsonicwall-nsa2400-no-internet-access%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

                                          Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

                                          What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company