Sonicwall NSA2400 - No internet accessServer 2008 R2 DNS not resolving TLD'sOdd Site-to-site VPN connectivity issueUnable to ping or access internetSonicwall Enhanced With One-To-One NAT, Firewall Blocking EverythingSonicwall NSA 240, Configured for LAN and DMZ, X0 and X2 on same switch - ping issuesTwo email servers behind Sonicwall unable to communicate with each otherSonicwall NSA with ping/Internet to wakeWebsever behind Sonicwall, Gateway TimeoutDNS and PING failure - Windows 2003 DNS and SonicWall NSA240Installed a new Sonicwall at MPLS provider's DC, got it working by luck but have no idea WHY it's working like thisopenvpn client behind sonicwall can't see WAN

Why could the Lunar Ascent Engine be used only once?

Failing students when it might cause them economic ruin

Why aren't satellites disintegrated even though they orbit earth within earth's Roche Limits?

Vehemently against code formatting

How could the B-29 bomber back up under its own power?

How come Arya Stark wasn't hurt by this in Game of Thrones Season 8 Episode 5?

Easier way to draw a filled ellipse with top edge dashed and bottom edge solid?

Parse a C++14 integer literal

What should I wear to go and sign an employment contract?

Hotel booking: Why is Agoda much cheaper than booking.com?

Latin words remembered from high school 50 years ago

Can the word crowd refer to just 10 people?

Why didn't Daenerys' advisers suggest assassinating Cersei?

On a piano, are the effects of holding notes and the sustain pedal the same for a single chord?

How could Dwarves prevent sand from filling up their settlements

Greek theta instead of lower case þ (Icelandic) in TexStudio

Does the Aboleth have expertise in history and perception?

How do we explain the use of a software on a math paper?

How can I prevent Bash expansion from passing files starting with "-" as argument?

How to safely discharge oneself

Will this series of events work to drown the Tarrasque?

Head-internal relative clauses

Very serious stuff - Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"

Does science define life as "beginning at conception"?



Sonicwall NSA2400 - No internet access


Server 2008 R2 DNS not resolving TLD'sOdd Site-to-site VPN connectivity issueUnable to ping or access internetSonicwall Enhanced With One-To-One NAT, Firewall Blocking EverythingSonicwall NSA 240, Configured for LAN and DMZ, X0 and X2 on same switch - ping issuesTwo email servers behind Sonicwall unable to communicate with each otherSonicwall NSA with ping/Internet to wakeWebsever behind Sonicwall, Gateway TimeoutDNS and PING failure - Windows 2003 DNS and SonicWall NSA240Installed a new Sonicwall at MPLS provider's DC, got it working by luck but have no idea WHY it's working like thisopenvpn client behind sonicwall can't see WAN






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















We've got a SonicWall NSA2400 configured with a LAN (X0) and a WAN(X1) interface.
It was setup and working fine until just recently when a temporary worker changed some settings most likely NAT.



We can ping on the LAN just fine, we also have another FW setup that works just fine with internet connectivity so we know that's not the issue.
Pinging between the two firewalls work fine and also inbetween clients.



We have tried NAT rules that blows everything wide open, basically allow Any to Any with Any service and so forth. We cannot ping our ISP DNS either. We even tried adding the Google DNS (8.8.8.8) to no avail.



If I setup a computer with the WAN IP & DNS everything works fine, same as through other FW's.



I don't have much experience with SW FW's, what is interesting however is that if you ping out from a client. It is able to resolve the hostname to an IP, e.g.



Pinging yahoo.com [98.138.253.109] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Etc.



This works for ANY address/hostname we ping, it will resolve to IP then timeout.
Trying to go through a webpage to both hostname or IP and it won't connect.



Has anyone ran into a similar problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks in advance and best regards.



Tom










share|improve this question






















  • What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

    – KJ-SRS
    Aug 30 '12 at 19:51











  • I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

    – Travis
    Oct 4 '16 at 16:44












  • Can you expand with trace route ?

    – Timothy Frew
    Apr 24 '18 at 23:09

















1















We've got a SonicWall NSA2400 configured with a LAN (X0) and a WAN(X1) interface.
It was setup and working fine until just recently when a temporary worker changed some settings most likely NAT.



We can ping on the LAN just fine, we also have another FW setup that works just fine with internet connectivity so we know that's not the issue.
Pinging between the two firewalls work fine and also inbetween clients.



We have tried NAT rules that blows everything wide open, basically allow Any to Any with Any service and so forth. We cannot ping our ISP DNS either. We even tried adding the Google DNS (8.8.8.8) to no avail.



If I setup a computer with the WAN IP & DNS everything works fine, same as through other FW's.



I don't have much experience with SW FW's, what is interesting however is that if you ping out from a client. It is able to resolve the hostname to an IP, e.g.



Pinging yahoo.com [98.138.253.109] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Etc.



This works for ANY address/hostname we ping, it will resolve to IP then timeout.
Trying to go through a webpage to both hostname or IP and it won't connect.



Has anyone ran into a similar problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks in advance and best regards.



Tom










share|improve this question






















  • What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

    – KJ-SRS
    Aug 30 '12 at 19:51











  • I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

    – Travis
    Oct 4 '16 at 16:44












  • Can you expand with trace route ?

    – Timothy Frew
    Apr 24 '18 at 23:09













1












1








1








We've got a SonicWall NSA2400 configured with a LAN (X0) and a WAN(X1) interface.
It was setup and working fine until just recently when a temporary worker changed some settings most likely NAT.



We can ping on the LAN just fine, we also have another FW setup that works just fine with internet connectivity so we know that's not the issue.
Pinging between the two firewalls work fine and also inbetween clients.



We have tried NAT rules that blows everything wide open, basically allow Any to Any with Any service and so forth. We cannot ping our ISP DNS either. We even tried adding the Google DNS (8.8.8.8) to no avail.



If I setup a computer with the WAN IP & DNS everything works fine, same as through other FW's.



I don't have much experience with SW FW's, what is interesting however is that if you ping out from a client. It is able to resolve the hostname to an IP, e.g.



Pinging yahoo.com [98.138.253.109] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Etc.



This works for ANY address/hostname we ping, it will resolve to IP then timeout.
Trying to go through a webpage to both hostname or IP and it won't connect.



Has anyone ran into a similar problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks in advance and best regards.



Tom










share|improve this question














We've got a SonicWall NSA2400 configured with a LAN (X0) and a WAN(X1) interface.
It was setup and working fine until just recently when a temporary worker changed some settings most likely NAT.



We can ping on the LAN just fine, we also have another FW setup that works just fine with internet connectivity so we know that's not the issue.
Pinging between the two firewalls work fine and also inbetween clients.



We have tried NAT rules that blows everything wide open, basically allow Any to Any with Any service and so forth. We cannot ping our ISP DNS either. We even tried adding the Google DNS (8.8.8.8) to no avail.



If I setup a computer with the WAN IP & DNS everything works fine, same as through other FW's.



I don't have much experience with SW FW's, what is interesting however is that if you ping out from a client. It is able to resolve the hostname to an IP, e.g.



Pinging yahoo.com [98.138.253.109] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Etc.



This works for ANY address/hostname we ping, it will resolve to IP then timeout.
Trying to go through a webpage to both hostname or IP and it won't connect.



Has anyone ran into a similar problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks in advance and best regards.



Tom







domain-name-system firewall ping sonicwall






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 30 '12 at 17:40









Tom EricksonTom Erickson

612




612












  • What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

    – KJ-SRS
    Aug 30 '12 at 19:51











  • I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

    – Travis
    Oct 4 '16 at 16:44












  • Can you expand with trace route ?

    – Timothy Frew
    Apr 24 '18 at 23:09

















  • What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

    – KJ-SRS
    Aug 30 '12 at 19:51











  • I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

    – Travis
    Oct 4 '16 at 16:44












  • Can you expand with trace route ?

    – Timothy Frew
    Apr 24 '18 at 23:09
















What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

– KJ-SRS
Aug 30 '12 at 19:51





What does the Sonicwall's routing table look like (Network -> Routing)?

– KJ-SRS
Aug 30 '12 at 19:51













I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

– Travis
Oct 4 '16 at 16:44






I had something somewhat similar: serverfault.com/questions/791870/…

– Travis
Oct 4 '16 at 16:44














Can you expand with trace route ?

– Timothy Frew
Apr 24 '18 at 23:09





Can you expand with trace route ?

– Timothy Frew
Apr 24 '18 at 23:09










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















0














This is a pretty vague question. Since you don't know what the temp worker changed, it's hard to tell you what to undo. Do you have a copy of the backup settings? That would be the easiest way to get back to a working config.



If not, honestly, the easiest way may be to reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigure. Before you do, write down all pertinent IPs, custom firewall and NAT rules, etc. The fact that you started adding a bunch of Any to Any NAT rules (without knowing what they do) is really going to mess things up.



Hope that helps






share|improve this answer






























    0














    Just the log and see if the firewall is dropping packets based on missing or "deny" rules. ifyou don't see anything in there, it might be a missing nat rule, but generally the outbound default rules take care of outbound traffic unless blocked by a firewall rule. Generally speaking though, by default LAN->WAN traffic allows all.






    share|improve this answer






























      0














      In Sonicwall firewalls, regardless of whether you have multiple internet providers or just one, you have to set at least one interface in the default LB group in Network > Failover & LB > Default LB Group, as shown in this screenshot:



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer






























        0














        Start with the logs. Don't go diving in changing the configuration straight off the bat, it usually makes things worse and you end up forgetting what you changed as well.



        Hopefully, by looking at the logs you should be able to identify what was changed. Failing that, can you see through the logs if the firewall is dropping/rejecting packets?



        The fact that you can resolve DNS suggests that your routing and NAT is in place (unless you are running an internal caching nameserver), but general traffic is being blocked. This sounds to me like a firewall rule gone wrong.



        Failing all of the above, take a backup of the system logs now so you can analyse them later, then just restore the system from a good backup. You should then analyse the logs of the 'broken' config to identify what was done.






        share|improve this answer























          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "2"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f422992%2fsonicwall-nsa2400-no-internet-access%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          This is a pretty vague question. Since you don't know what the temp worker changed, it's hard to tell you what to undo. Do you have a copy of the backup settings? That would be the easiest way to get back to a working config.



          If not, honestly, the easiest way may be to reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigure. Before you do, write down all pertinent IPs, custom firewall and NAT rules, etc. The fact that you started adding a bunch of Any to Any NAT rules (without knowing what they do) is really going to mess things up.



          Hope that helps






          share|improve this answer



























            0














            This is a pretty vague question. Since you don't know what the temp worker changed, it's hard to tell you what to undo. Do you have a copy of the backup settings? That would be the easiest way to get back to a working config.



            If not, honestly, the easiest way may be to reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigure. Before you do, write down all pertinent IPs, custom firewall and NAT rules, etc. The fact that you started adding a bunch of Any to Any NAT rules (without knowing what they do) is really going to mess things up.



            Hope that helps






            share|improve this answer

























              0












              0








              0







              This is a pretty vague question. Since you don't know what the temp worker changed, it's hard to tell you what to undo. Do you have a copy of the backup settings? That would be the easiest way to get back to a working config.



              If not, honestly, the easiest way may be to reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigure. Before you do, write down all pertinent IPs, custom firewall and NAT rules, etc. The fact that you started adding a bunch of Any to Any NAT rules (without knowing what they do) is really going to mess things up.



              Hope that helps






              share|improve this answer













              This is a pretty vague question. Since you don't know what the temp worker changed, it's hard to tell you what to undo. Do you have a copy of the backup settings? That would be the easiest way to get back to a working config.



              If not, honestly, the easiest way may be to reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigure. Before you do, write down all pertinent IPs, custom firewall and NAT rules, etc. The fact that you started adding a bunch of Any to Any NAT rules (without knowing what they do) is really going to mess things up.



              Hope that helps







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Aug 30 '12 at 17:57









              Jim G.Jim G.

              2,36711317




              2,36711317























                  0














                  Just the log and see if the firewall is dropping packets based on missing or "deny" rules. ifyou don't see anything in there, it might be a missing nat rule, but generally the outbound default rules take care of outbound traffic unless blocked by a firewall rule. Generally speaking though, by default LAN->WAN traffic allows all.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    0














                    Just the log and see if the firewall is dropping packets based on missing or "deny" rules. ifyou don't see anything in there, it might be a missing nat rule, but generally the outbound default rules take care of outbound traffic unless blocked by a firewall rule. Generally speaking though, by default LAN->WAN traffic allows all.






                    share|improve this answer

























                      0












                      0








                      0







                      Just the log and see if the firewall is dropping packets based on missing or "deny" rules. ifyou don't see anything in there, it might be a missing nat rule, but generally the outbound default rules take care of outbound traffic unless blocked by a firewall rule. Generally speaking though, by default LAN->WAN traffic allows all.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Just the log and see if the firewall is dropping packets based on missing or "deny" rules. ifyou don't see anything in there, it might be a missing nat rule, but generally the outbound default rules take care of outbound traffic unless blocked by a firewall rule. Generally speaking though, by default LAN->WAN traffic allows all.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Aug 30 '12 at 19:48









                      MikeAWoodMikeAWood

                      2,3811813




                      2,3811813





















                          0














                          In Sonicwall firewalls, regardless of whether you have multiple internet providers or just one, you have to set at least one interface in the default LB group in Network > Failover & LB > Default LB Group, as shown in this screenshot:



                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer



























                            0














                            In Sonicwall firewalls, regardless of whether you have multiple internet providers or just one, you have to set at least one interface in the default LB group in Network > Failover & LB > Default LB Group, as shown in this screenshot:



                            enter image description here






                            share|improve this answer

























                              0












                              0








                              0







                              In Sonicwall firewalls, regardless of whether you have multiple internet providers or just one, you have to set at least one interface in the default LB group in Network > Failover & LB > Default LB Group, as shown in this screenshot:



                              enter image description here






                              share|improve this answer













                              In Sonicwall firewalls, regardless of whether you have multiple internet providers or just one, you have to set at least one interface in the default LB group in Network > Failover & LB > Default LB Group, as shown in this screenshot:



                              enter image description here







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Jan 25 '14 at 23:40









                              Gabriel TalaveraGabriel Talavera

                              1,1971917




                              1,1971917





















                                  0














                                  Start with the logs. Don't go diving in changing the configuration straight off the bat, it usually makes things worse and you end up forgetting what you changed as well.



                                  Hopefully, by looking at the logs you should be able to identify what was changed. Failing that, can you see through the logs if the firewall is dropping/rejecting packets?



                                  The fact that you can resolve DNS suggests that your routing and NAT is in place (unless you are running an internal caching nameserver), but general traffic is being blocked. This sounds to me like a firewall rule gone wrong.



                                  Failing all of the above, take a backup of the system logs now so you can analyse them later, then just restore the system from a good backup. You should then analyse the logs of the 'broken' config to identify what was done.






                                  share|improve this answer



























                                    0














                                    Start with the logs. Don't go diving in changing the configuration straight off the bat, it usually makes things worse and you end up forgetting what you changed as well.



                                    Hopefully, by looking at the logs you should be able to identify what was changed. Failing that, can you see through the logs if the firewall is dropping/rejecting packets?



                                    The fact that you can resolve DNS suggests that your routing and NAT is in place (unless you are running an internal caching nameserver), but general traffic is being blocked. This sounds to me like a firewall rule gone wrong.



                                    Failing all of the above, take a backup of the system logs now so you can analyse them later, then just restore the system from a good backup. You should then analyse the logs of the 'broken' config to identify what was done.






                                    share|improve this answer

























                                      0












                                      0








                                      0







                                      Start with the logs. Don't go diving in changing the configuration straight off the bat, it usually makes things worse and you end up forgetting what you changed as well.



                                      Hopefully, by looking at the logs you should be able to identify what was changed. Failing that, can you see through the logs if the firewall is dropping/rejecting packets?



                                      The fact that you can resolve DNS suggests that your routing and NAT is in place (unless you are running an internal caching nameserver), but general traffic is being blocked. This sounds to me like a firewall rule gone wrong.



                                      Failing all of the above, take a backup of the system logs now so you can analyse them later, then just restore the system from a good backup. You should then analyse the logs of the 'broken' config to identify what was done.






                                      share|improve this answer













                                      Start with the logs. Don't go diving in changing the configuration straight off the bat, it usually makes things worse and you end up forgetting what you changed as well.



                                      Hopefully, by looking at the logs you should be able to identify what was changed. Failing that, can you see through the logs if the firewall is dropping/rejecting packets?



                                      The fact that you can resolve DNS suggests that your routing and NAT is in place (unless you are running an internal caching nameserver), but general traffic is being blocked. This sounds to me like a firewall rule gone wrong.



                                      Failing all of the above, take a backup of the system logs now so you can analyse them later, then just restore the system from a good backup. You should then analyse the logs of the 'broken' config to identify what was done.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Aug 17 '15 at 7:51









                                      tomstephens89tomstephens89

                                      661823




                                      661823



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f422992%2fsonicwall-nsa2400-no-internet-access%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                                          Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                                          Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020