Poisson distribution: why does time between events follow an exponential distribution?The Number of Exponential Summands in a Fixed Interval is Poisson
Multi tool use
Counterfeit check
Does anyone recognize these rockets, and their location?
Is this a valid proof that A = B given A ∩ B = A ∪ B?
How to avoid offending original culture when making conculture inspired from original
How to address players struggling with simple controls?
Would a 7805 5v regulator drain a 9v battery?
How do I become a better writer when I hate reading?
How to prevent cables getting intertwined
My student in one course asks for paid tutoring in another course. Appropriate?
What is the context for Napoleon's quote "[the Austrians] did not know the value of five minutes"?
Automatically open a terminal window and run a command, robustly
Why can't I craft scaffolding in Minecraft 1.14?
How could I create a situation in which a PC has to make a saving throw or be forced to pet a dog?
Why do you need to heat the pan before heating the olive oil?
Can you place a web spell on a surface you cannot see?
What does "vrit' mean with reference to documentaries?
In the US, can a former president run again?
Is there any possible way to get these hearts as Adult Link?
Having some issue with notation in a Hilbert space
What is the word?
Is a sequel allowed to start before the end of the first book?
Justifying Affordable Bespoke Spaceships
Weird thing in 737 cabin
Should I include fillets on my 3d printed parts?
Poisson distribution: why does time between events follow an exponential distribution?
The Number of Exponential Summands in a Fixed Interval is Poisson
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I was reading an article, and came across the following:
Purchase count follows a Poisson distribution with rate λ. In other
words, the timing of these purchases is somewhat random, but the rate
(in counts/unit time) is constant. In turn, this implies that the
inter-purchase time at the customer level should follow an exponential
distribution.
It's been quite a while since I did any statistics so I am struggling with the definitions of a Poisson distribution. What I understand by the "rate is constant" is that if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?
Where I believe I am confused is with the final sentence. Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on? Doesn't this contradict the idea that we have a constant rate of purchase?
poisson-distribution
asked May 31 at 16:10
J. StottJ. Stott
285
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was reading an article, and came across the following:
Purchase count follows a Poisson distribution with rate λ. In other
words, the timing of these purchases is somewhat random, but the rate
(in counts/unit time) is constant. In turn, this implies that the
inter-purchase time at the customer level should follow an exponential
distribution.
It's been quite a while since I did any statistics so I am struggling with the definitions of a Poisson distribution. What I understand by the "rate is constant" is that if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?
Where I believe I am confused is with the final sentence. Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on? Doesn't this contradict the idea that we have a constant rate of purchase?
poisson-distribution
asked May 31 at 16:10
J. StottJ. Stott
285
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 31 at 16:29
$begingroup$
$$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
May 31 at 19:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was reading an article, and came across the following:
Purchase count follows a Poisson distribution with rate λ. In other
words, the timing of these purchases is somewhat random, but the rate
(in counts/unit time) is constant. In turn, this implies that the
inter-purchase time at the customer level should follow an exponential
distribution.
It's been quite a while since I did any statistics so I am struggling with the definitions of a Poisson distribution. What I understand by the "rate is constant" is that if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?
Where I believe I am confused is with the final sentence. Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on? Doesn't this contradict the idea that we have a constant rate of purchase?
poisson-distribution
asked May 31 at 16:10
J. StottJ. Stott
285
$endgroup$
I was reading an article, and came across the following:
Purchase count follows a Poisson distribution with rate λ. In other
words, the timing of these purchases is somewhat random, but the rate
(in counts/unit time) is constant. In turn, this implies that the
inter-purchase time at the customer level should follow an exponential
distribution.
It's been quite a while since I did any statistics so I am struggling with the definitions of a Poisson distribution. What I understand by the "rate is constant" is that if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?
Where I believe I am confused is with the final sentence. Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on? Doesn't this contradict the idea that we have a constant rate of purchase?
poisson-distribution
poisson-distribution
asked May 31 at 16:10
J. StottJ. Stott
285
asked May 31 at 16:10
J. StottJ. Stott
285
asked May 31 at 16:10
J. StottJ. Stott
285
asked May 31 at 16:10
J. StottJ. Stott
285
asked May 31 at 16:10
J. StottJ. Stott
285
285
$begingroup$
For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 31 at 16:29
$begingroup$
$$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
May 31 at 19:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 31 at 16:29
$begingroup$
$$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
May 31 at 19:17
$begingroup$
For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 31 at 16:29
$begingroup$
For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 31 at 16:29
$begingroup$
$$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
May 31 at 19:17
$begingroup$
$$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
May 31 at 19:17
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $X_t$ be the number of arrivals in the Poisson process with rate $lambda$ between time $0$ and time $tge0.$ Then we have
$$
Pr(X_t=x) = frac(lambda t)^x e^-lambda tx! text for x=0,1,2,3,ldots
$$
Let $T$ be the time until the first arrival.
Then the following two events are really both the same event:
$$
Big[ X_t=0Big]. qquad Big[ T>t Big].
$$
So they both have the same probability. Thus
$$
Pr(T>t) = Pr(X_t=0) = frac(lambda t)^0 e^-lambda t0! = e^-lambda t.
$$
So
$$
Pr(T>t) = e^-lambda t text for tge0.
$$
That says $T$ is exponentially distributed.
answered May 31 at 18:59
Michael HardyMichael Hardy
4,4541430
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's very clever. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– J. Stott
Jun 3 at 8:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Exponential distribution doesn't imply that time between events grows exponentially. All it tells you is that probability to wait longer between events declines very quickly with waiting time. The probability density is:$$lambda e^-lambda t$$ where $lambda$ is Poisson intensity, i.e. average number of events in unit of time, and $t$ is the waiting time. The average waiting time is obviously $1/lambda$.
answered May 31 at 16:15
AksakalAksakal
40.6k454123
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f411018%2fpoisson-distribution-why-does-time-between-events-follow-an-exponential-distrib%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $X_t$ be the number of arrivals in the Poisson process with rate $lambda$ between time $0$ and time $tge0.$ Then we have
$$
Pr(X_t=x) = frac(lambda t)^x e^-lambda tx! text for x=0,1,2,3,ldots
$$
Let $T$ be the time until the first arrival.
Then the following two events are really both the same event:
$$
Big[ X_t=0Big]. qquad Big[ T>t Big].
$$
So they both have the same probability. Thus
$$
Pr(T>t) = Pr(X_t=0) = frac(lambda t)^0 e^-lambda t0! = e^-lambda t.
$$
So
$$
Pr(T>t) = e^-lambda t text for tge0.
$$
That says $T$ is exponentially distributed.
answered May 31 at 18:59
Michael HardyMichael Hardy
4,4541430
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's very clever. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– J. Stott
Jun 3 at 8:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X_t$ be the number of arrivals in the Poisson process with rate $lambda$ between time $0$ and time $tge0.$ Then we have
$$
Pr(X_t=x) = frac(lambda t)^x e^-lambda tx! text for x=0,1,2,3,ldots
$$
Let $T$ be the time until the first arrival.
Then the following two events are really both the same event:
$$
Big[ X_t=0Big]. qquad Big[ T>t Big].
$$
So they both have the same probability. Thus
$$
Pr(T>t) = Pr(X_t=0) = frac(lambda t)^0 e^-lambda t0! = e^-lambda t.
$$
So
$$
Pr(T>t) = e^-lambda t text for tge0.
$$
That says $T$ is exponentially distributed.
answered May 31 at 18:59
Michael HardyMichael Hardy
4,4541430
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's very clever. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– J. Stott
Jun 3 at 8:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X_t$ be the number of arrivals in the Poisson process with rate $lambda$ between time $0$ and time $tge0.$ Then we have
$$
Pr(X_t=x) = frac(lambda t)^x e^-lambda tx! text for x=0,1,2,3,ldots
$$
Let $T$ be the time until the first arrival.
Then the following two events are really both the same event:
$$
Big[ X_t=0Big]. qquad Big[ T>t Big].
$$
So they both have the same probability. Thus
$$
Pr(T>t) = Pr(X_t=0) = frac(lambda t)^0 e^-lambda t0! = e^-lambda t.
$$
So
$$
Pr(T>t) = e^-lambda t text for tge0.
$$
That says $T$ is exponentially distributed.
answered May 31 at 18:59
Michael HardyMichael Hardy
4,4541430
$endgroup$
Let $X_t$ be the number of arrivals in the Poisson process with rate $lambda$ between time $0$ and time $tge0.$ Then we have
$$
Pr(X_t=x) = frac(lambda t)^x e^-lambda tx! text for x=0,1,2,3,ldots
$$
Let $T$ be the time until the first arrival.
Then the following two events are really both the same event:
$$
Big[ X_t=0Big]. qquad Big[ T>t Big].
$$
So they both have the same probability. Thus
$$
Pr(T>t) = Pr(X_t=0) = frac(lambda t)^0 e^-lambda t0! = e^-lambda t.
$$
So
$$
Pr(T>t) = e^-lambda t text for tge0.
$$
That says $T$ is exponentially distributed.
answered May 31 at 18:59
Michael HardyMichael Hardy
4,4541430
answered May 31 at 18:59
Michael HardyMichael Hardy
4,4541430
answered May 31 at 18:59
Michael HardyMichael Hardy
4,4541430
answered May 31 at 18:59
Michael HardyMichael Hardy
4,4541430
4,4541430
$begingroup$
That's very clever. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– J. Stott
Jun 3 at 8:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That's very clever. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– J. Stott
Jun 3 at 8:45
$begingroup$
That's very clever. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– J. Stott
Jun 3 at 8:45
$begingroup$
That's very clever. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– J. Stott
Jun 3 at 8:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Exponential distribution doesn't imply that time between events grows exponentially. All it tells you is that probability to wait longer between events declines very quickly with waiting time. The probability density is:$$lambda e^-lambda t$$ where $lambda$ is Poisson intensity, i.e. average number of events in unit of time, and $t$ is the waiting time. The average waiting time is obviously $1/lambda$.
answered May 31 at 16:15
AksakalAksakal
40.6k454123
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Exponential distribution doesn't imply that time between events grows exponentially. All it tells you is that probability to wait longer between events declines very quickly with waiting time. The probability density is:$$lambda e^-lambda t$$ where $lambda$ is Poisson intensity, i.e. average number of events in unit of time, and $t$ is the waiting time. The average waiting time is obviously $1/lambda$.
answered May 31 at 16:15
AksakalAksakal
40.6k454123
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Exponential distribution doesn't imply that time between events grows exponentially. All it tells you is that probability to wait longer between events declines very quickly with waiting time. The probability density is:$$lambda e^-lambda t$$ where $lambda$ is Poisson intensity, i.e. average number of events in unit of time, and $t$ is the waiting time. The average waiting time is obviously $1/lambda$.
answered May 31 at 16:15
AksakalAksakal
40.6k454123
$endgroup$
Exponential distribution doesn't imply that time between events grows exponentially. All it tells you is that probability to wait longer between events declines very quickly with waiting time. The probability density is:$$lambda e^-lambda t$$ where $lambda$ is Poisson intensity, i.e. average number of events in unit of time, and $t$ is the waiting time. The average waiting time is obviously $1/lambda$.
answered May 31 at 16:15
AksakalAksakal
40.6k454123
answered May 31 at 16:15
AksakalAksakal
40.6k454123
answered May 31 at 16:15
AksakalAksakal
40.6k454123
answered May 31 at 16:15
AksakalAksakal
40.6k454123
40.6k454123
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f411018%2fpoisson-distribution-why-does-time-between-events-follow-an-exponential-distrib%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
wui5 is2W xFSq5AH,4 xjPhNwI2c2DIq8r4M,BRpZOhS,je7 BLxmj XXme03xWMkImCFmeG
$begingroup$
For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
May 31 at 16:29
$begingroup$
$$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
May 31 at 19:17