The ring of global sections of a regular schemeGlobal sections of flat scheme also flat?Embedding of a scheme into a regular schemeIf $X,Y$ are regular and of finite type over $S$, can $Xtimes _S Y$ be embedded into a regular $S$-scheme? What are the local properties of schemes preserved under global sections?Sections of morphisms up to fppf coveringFinite generation of global sections of an invertible sheaf on a quasi-projective schemeSchemes monomorphing into affine scheme of dimension 1The underlying space of a scheme remembers its affineness?Size of the ring of functions on open subschemesGeometric regularity for infinitely generated field extensions
The ring of global sections of a regular scheme
Global sections of flat scheme also flat?Embedding of a scheme into a regular schemeIf $X,Y$ are regular and of finite type over $S$, can $Xtimes _S Y$ be embedded into a regular $S$-scheme? What are the local properties of schemes preserved under global sections?Sections of morphisms up to fppf coveringFinite generation of global sections of an invertible sheaf on a quasi-projective schemeSchemes monomorphing into affine scheme of dimension 1The underlying space of a scheme remembers its affineness?Size of the ring of functions on open subschemesGeometric regularity for infinitely generated field extensions
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a Noetherian regular scheme. Is $mathcalO_X(X)$ a regular ring? For affine schemes this is true, see 02IU on the Stacks project.
ag.algebraic-geometry schemes regular-rings
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a Noetherian regular scheme. Is $mathcalO_X(X)$ a regular ring? For affine schemes this is true, see 02IU on the Stacks project.
ag.algebraic-geometry schemes regular-rings
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Probably related: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4200/flood-of-new-users
$endgroup$
– YCor
May 31 at 13:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a Noetherian regular scheme. Is $mathcalO_X(X)$ a regular ring? For affine schemes this is true, see 02IU on the Stacks project.
ag.algebraic-geometry schemes regular-rings
$endgroup$
Let $X$ be a Noetherian regular scheme. Is $mathcalO_X(X)$ a regular ring? For affine schemes this is true, see 02IU on the Stacks project.
ag.algebraic-geometry schemes regular-rings
ag.algebraic-geometry schemes regular-rings
edited May 31 at 13:59
Wojowu
8,03613462
8,03613462
asked May 31 at 13:45
user141316
6
$begingroup$
Probably related: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4200/flood-of-new-users
$endgroup$
– YCor
May 31 at 13:57
add a comment |
6
$begingroup$
Probably related: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4200/flood-of-new-users
$endgroup$
– YCor
May 31 at 13:57
6
6
$begingroup$
Probably related: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4200/flood-of-new-users
$endgroup$
– YCor
May 31 at 13:57
$begingroup$
Probably related: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4200/flood-of-new-users
$endgroup$
– YCor
May 31 at 13:57
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is no. For instance, take the quadratic cone
$$
Y = mathrmSpec(Bbbk[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2))
$$
and let $X$ be its blowup at the vertex. Then $X$ is regular, but
$$
H^0(X,mathcalO_X) = H^0(Y,mathcalO_Y) = Bbbk[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2)
$$
is not.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f332951%2fthe-ring-of-global-sections-of-a-regular-scheme%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is no. For instance, take the quadratic cone
$$
Y = mathrmSpec(Bbbk[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2))
$$
and let $X$ be its blowup at the vertex. Then $X$ is regular, but
$$
H^0(X,mathcalO_X) = H^0(Y,mathcalO_Y) = Bbbk[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2)
$$
is not.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is no. For instance, take the quadratic cone
$$
Y = mathrmSpec(Bbbk[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2))
$$
and let $X$ be its blowup at the vertex. Then $X$ is regular, but
$$
H^0(X,mathcalO_X) = H^0(Y,mathcalO_Y) = Bbbk[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2)
$$
is not.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is no. For instance, take the quadratic cone
$$
Y = mathrmSpec(Bbbk[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2))
$$
and let $X$ be its blowup at the vertex. Then $X$ is regular, but
$$
H^0(X,mathcalO_X) = H^0(Y,mathcalO_Y) = Bbbk[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2)
$$
is not.
$endgroup$
The answer is no. For instance, take the quadratic cone
$$
Y = mathrmSpec(Bbbk[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2))
$$
and let $X$ be its blowup at the vertex. Then $X$ is regular, but
$$
H^0(X,mathcalO_X) = H^0(Y,mathcalO_Y) = Bbbk[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2)
$$
is not.
answered May 31 at 15:54
SashaSasha
21.9k22860
21.9k22860
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f332951%2fthe-ring-of-global-sections-of-a-regular-scheme%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
$begingroup$
Probably related: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4200/flood-of-new-users
$endgroup$
– YCor
May 31 at 13:57