What to do when you've set the wrong ISO for your film?Where can I get 4x5″, 5x7″, or 8x10″ color sheet film (or other hard-to-find exotic film) processed?What is the relationship between film speed and shutter speed?How might the flash mode affect the exposure program on a point and shoot film camera? (Agfa Optima Sensor Flash)My roll of film didn't rewind inside all the wayWhat does Exposure bias in EXIF means? Fujifilm xt1 tag(0x9650)How do I calculate film ISO compensation for non–through-the-lens metering when using an ND filter?Can I use high ISO film in bright light (without problems)?Recommended ISO setting when shooting with Ilford Delta 400 Professional film?What is the relationship between film speed and the ISO setting on my film camera?How do I figure out what ISO to use when shooting film?
bash does not know the letter 'p'
What is the logic behind taxing money for property?
Explain the ending of Black Mirror's "Smithereens"
Fermat's statement about the ancients: How serious was he?
Why not invest in precious metals?
Should I put programming books I wrote a few years ago on my resume?
The Frozen Wastes
60s or 70s novel about Empire of Man making 1st contact with 1st discovered alien race
Return a String containing only alphabets without spaces
A map of non-pathological topology?
UTC timestamp format for launch vehicles
Is it possible for a vehicle to be manufactured without a catalytic converter?
Can a human be transformed into a Mind Flayer?
Can all groups be thought of as the symmetries of a geometrical object?
Non-aqueous eyes?
Why was this person allowed to become Grand Maester?
Why does this query, missing a FROM clause, not error out?
What is the color of artificial intelligence?
How can I use String in enum for Apex?
Generate basis elements of the Steenrod algebra
How to “listen” to existing circuit
How creative should the DM let an artificer be in terms of what they can build?
If I leave the US through an airport, do I have to return through the same airport?
What differences exist between adamantine and adamantite in all editions of D&D?
What to do when you've set the wrong ISO for your film?
Where can I get 4x5″, 5x7″, or 8x10″ color sheet film (or other hard-to-find exotic film) processed?What is the relationship between film speed and shutter speed?How might the flash mode affect the exposure program on a point and shoot film camera? (Agfa Optima Sensor Flash)My roll of film didn't rewind inside all the wayWhat does Exposure bias in EXIF means? Fujifilm xt1 tag(0x9650)How do I calculate film ISO compensation for non–through-the-lens metering when using an ND filter?Can I use high ISO film in bright light (without problems)?Recommended ISO setting when shooting with Ilford Delta 400 Professional film?What is the relationship between film speed and the ISO setting on my film camera?How do I figure out what ISO to use when shooting film?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I’ve put my Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 into my Minolta Hi-Matic 7 and I forgot to change the ISO setting for the new film. It’s set for the last roll at 200.
So what setting should I put for a normal sunny day, shaded afternoon, and night? When I develop it, what should I tell the lab?
exposure film photography-basics
add a comment |
I’ve put my Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 into my Minolta Hi-Matic 7 and I forgot to change the ISO setting for the new film. It’s set for the last roll at 200.
So what setting should I put for a normal sunny day, shaded afternoon, and night? When I develop it, what should I tell the lab?
exposure film photography-basics
6
You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead
– timvrhn
May 24 at 10:24
5
Have you exposed any of the film yet?
– Michael C
May 24 at 11:55
add a comment |
I’ve put my Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 into my Minolta Hi-Matic 7 and I forgot to change the ISO setting for the new film. It’s set for the last roll at 200.
So what setting should I put for a normal sunny day, shaded afternoon, and night? When I develop it, what should I tell the lab?
exposure film photography-basics
I’ve put my Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 into my Minolta Hi-Matic 7 and I forgot to change the ISO setting for the new film. It’s set for the last roll at 200.
So what setting should I put for a normal sunny day, shaded afternoon, and night? When I develop it, what should I tell the lab?
exposure film photography-basics
exposure film photography-basics
edited May 24 at 15:27
Hueco
13.6k32963
13.6k32963
asked May 24 at 10:06
Gerard UntalanGerard Untalan
462
462
6
You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead
– timvrhn
May 24 at 10:24
5
Have you exposed any of the film yet?
– Michael C
May 24 at 11:55
add a comment |
6
You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead
– timvrhn
May 24 at 10:24
5
Have you exposed any of the film yet?
– Michael C
May 24 at 11:55
6
6
You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead
– timvrhn
May 24 at 10:24
You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead
– timvrhn
May 24 at 10:24
5
5
Have you exposed any of the film yet?
– Michael C
May 24 at 11:55
Have you exposed any of the film yet?
– Michael C
May 24 at 11:55
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Do not worry! Film has latitude -- it can tolerated a 2X error in exposure. Just continue as if nothing went wrong. Next time pay more attention to detail. Good Luck!
add a comment |
Your pictures will probably be overexposed by 1 stop. The effect depends on the type of film or sensor.
For negative films, overexposing is mostly OK and you may not notice. It will result in denser negatives, perhaps with more grain than you would like, and with more shadow detail. You can "pull process" the film to try and compensate--ask the processor to "pull one stop", but not all processors will support this, and the ones that do support it will probably charge you extra. If you are using black and white film you can just develop for a slightly shorter time, there are tables for your film and developer that will explain this. Pull processing is not necessary if you only overexposed by one stop, it is not a big deal. Some film/developer combinations notably recommend the same development time for normal development and pulling 1 stop!
For slide films, overexposing will result in a washed-out look with less vibrant colors. You generally want to avoid this, but it is not a disaster, and you can ask for pull process.
For digital, overexposure is usually a bit of a disaster, because it will blow out the highlights.
TL;DR: Since you are shooting a negative film, and only overexposing by one stop, you are probably fine and don't need to do anything.
Terminology
Pull processing: Ask the lab to develop less, to compensate for overexposed film. Not really necessary with only 1 stop of overexposure and negative film.
Push processing: The opposite of pull processing, when you ask the lab to develop extra to compensate for underexposed film.
Matter of Preference
Ultimately the ISO speed on the box is not actually a rule or even a recommendation for how much to expose the film! It is just a property of the film calculated in a certain way, designed to be a pretty good starting point for exposure.
If you are shooting film often, you may end up with your own preferences for how much to expose the film you are using, and that exposure might not match the speed on the box. I know a number of people who like to shoot "T-Max 100" at 50 ("overexpose" 1 stop) or shoot slide films like "Kodachrome 64" at 80, or "Velvia 50" at 64 ("underexpose" 1/3 stop). I put "overexpose" and "underexpose" in quotes because you are not really overexposing or underexposing, you are really exposing correctly just not using the exposure that it says on the box.
4
Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:05
And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.
– dmckee
May 25 at 16:45
1
@xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.
– Dietrich Epp
May 25 at 16:55
add a comment |
I'm confused: have you just loaded the roll or have you exposed it? If you have just loaded it but not yet taken any pictures then just change the ISO setting on the camera to be right (ie to be 400). If you have exposed frames on it then I'd just use it at that speed: the negs will be overexposed by about a stop but that's mostly fine. You can get (some) labs to push or (in this case) pull-process film but this will probably cost you more than just buying another roll.
add a comment |
The absolute worst thing you can do with color negative film is underexpose it. Here's an example test using a different color-neg film (https://petapixel.com/2018/02/05/test-reveals-exposure-limits-kodak-portra-400-film/). All color-neg film is similar in this property.
So, you have loaded your 400 speed film into a camera that thinks it's metering for 200 speed film. This mean that you have, depending on your metering...
- With a perfectly metered shot, you've overexposed by 1 stop.
- With a slightly underexposed shot, you've actually shot at box speed for the film
- With a slightly overexposed shot, you've now overexposed by 2 stops.
In all of the cases above, your images will turn out just fine if you do absolutely nothing. Have the film developed normally and call it a day.
The reason for this is the film's latitude. As you can see in the linked article above, color-neg film will tolerate exposures from 0 (perfect exposure) to 4 stops over and still look good. It'll tolerate from -1 to +5 and still be usable.
ALL of your exposure leeway is on the positive side. I know some people who downrate their color-neg film (for example, shoot a 400 speed film as if it were 320) simply to force a slight overexposure in their shots - as this drastically limits the probability of an underexposed frame.
This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:01
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108458%2fwhat-to-do-when-youve-set-the-wrong-iso-for-your-film%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Do not worry! Film has latitude -- it can tolerated a 2X error in exposure. Just continue as if nothing went wrong. Next time pay more attention to detail. Good Luck!
add a comment |
Do not worry! Film has latitude -- it can tolerated a 2X error in exposure. Just continue as if nothing went wrong. Next time pay more attention to detail. Good Luck!
add a comment |
Do not worry! Film has latitude -- it can tolerated a 2X error in exposure. Just continue as if nothing went wrong. Next time pay more attention to detail. Good Luck!
Do not worry! Film has latitude -- it can tolerated a 2X error in exposure. Just continue as if nothing went wrong. Next time pay more attention to detail. Good Luck!
answered May 24 at 13:33
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26.3k33062
26.3k33062
add a comment |
add a comment |
Your pictures will probably be overexposed by 1 stop. The effect depends on the type of film or sensor.
For negative films, overexposing is mostly OK and you may not notice. It will result in denser negatives, perhaps with more grain than you would like, and with more shadow detail. You can "pull process" the film to try and compensate--ask the processor to "pull one stop", but not all processors will support this, and the ones that do support it will probably charge you extra. If you are using black and white film you can just develop for a slightly shorter time, there are tables for your film and developer that will explain this. Pull processing is not necessary if you only overexposed by one stop, it is not a big deal. Some film/developer combinations notably recommend the same development time for normal development and pulling 1 stop!
For slide films, overexposing will result in a washed-out look with less vibrant colors. You generally want to avoid this, but it is not a disaster, and you can ask for pull process.
For digital, overexposure is usually a bit of a disaster, because it will blow out the highlights.
TL;DR: Since you are shooting a negative film, and only overexposing by one stop, you are probably fine and don't need to do anything.
Terminology
Pull processing: Ask the lab to develop less, to compensate for overexposed film. Not really necessary with only 1 stop of overexposure and negative film.
Push processing: The opposite of pull processing, when you ask the lab to develop extra to compensate for underexposed film.
Matter of Preference
Ultimately the ISO speed on the box is not actually a rule or even a recommendation for how much to expose the film! It is just a property of the film calculated in a certain way, designed to be a pretty good starting point for exposure.
If you are shooting film often, you may end up with your own preferences for how much to expose the film you are using, and that exposure might not match the speed on the box. I know a number of people who like to shoot "T-Max 100" at 50 ("overexpose" 1 stop) or shoot slide films like "Kodachrome 64" at 80, or "Velvia 50" at 64 ("underexpose" 1/3 stop). I put "overexpose" and "underexpose" in quotes because you are not really overexposing or underexposing, you are really exposing correctly just not using the exposure that it says on the box.
4
Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:05
And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.
– dmckee
May 25 at 16:45
1
@xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.
– Dietrich Epp
May 25 at 16:55
add a comment |
Your pictures will probably be overexposed by 1 stop. The effect depends on the type of film or sensor.
For negative films, overexposing is mostly OK and you may not notice. It will result in denser negatives, perhaps with more grain than you would like, and with more shadow detail. You can "pull process" the film to try and compensate--ask the processor to "pull one stop", but not all processors will support this, and the ones that do support it will probably charge you extra. If you are using black and white film you can just develop for a slightly shorter time, there are tables for your film and developer that will explain this. Pull processing is not necessary if you only overexposed by one stop, it is not a big deal. Some film/developer combinations notably recommend the same development time for normal development and pulling 1 stop!
For slide films, overexposing will result in a washed-out look with less vibrant colors. You generally want to avoid this, but it is not a disaster, and you can ask for pull process.
For digital, overexposure is usually a bit of a disaster, because it will blow out the highlights.
TL;DR: Since you are shooting a negative film, and only overexposing by one stop, you are probably fine and don't need to do anything.
Terminology
Pull processing: Ask the lab to develop less, to compensate for overexposed film. Not really necessary with only 1 stop of overexposure and negative film.
Push processing: The opposite of pull processing, when you ask the lab to develop extra to compensate for underexposed film.
Matter of Preference
Ultimately the ISO speed on the box is not actually a rule or even a recommendation for how much to expose the film! It is just a property of the film calculated in a certain way, designed to be a pretty good starting point for exposure.
If you are shooting film often, you may end up with your own preferences for how much to expose the film you are using, and that exposure might not match the speed on the box. I know a number of people who like to shoot "T-Max 100" at 50 ("overexpose" 1 stop) or shoot slide films like "Kodachrome 64" at 80, or "Velvia 50" at 64 ("underexpose" 1/3 stop). I put "overexpose" and "underexpose" in quotes because you are not really overexposing or underexposing, you are really exposing correctly just not using the exposure that it says on the box.
4
Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:05
And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.
– dmckee
May 25 at 16:45
1
@xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.
– Dietrich Epp
May 25 at 16:55
add a comment |
Your pictures will probably be overexposed by 1 stop. The effect depends on the type of film or sensor.
For negative films, overexposing is mostly OK and you may not notice. It will result in denser negatives, perhaps with more grain than you would like, and with more shadow detail. You can "pull process" the film to try and compensate--ask the processor to "pull one stop", but not all processors will support this, and the ones that do support it will probably charge you extra. If you are using black and white film you can just develop for a slightly shorter time, there are tables for your film and developer that will explain this. Pull processing is not necessary if you only overexposed by one stop, it is not a big deal. Some film/developer combinations notably recommend the same development time for normal development and pulling 1 stop!
For slide films, overexposing will result in a washed-out look with less vibrant colors. You generally want to avoid this, but it is not a disaster, and you can ask for pull process.
For digital, overexposure is usually a bit of a disaster, because it will blow out the highlights.
TL;DR: Since you are shooting a negative film, and only overexposing by one stop, you are probably fine and don't need to do anything.
Terminology
Pull processing: Ask the lab to develop less, to compensate for overexposed film. Not really necessary with only 1 stop of overexposure and negative film.
Push processing: The opposite of pull processing, when you ask the lab to develop extra to compensate for underexposed film.
Matter of Preference
Ultimately the ISO speed on the box is not actually a rule or even a recommendation for how much to expose the film! It is just a property of the film calculated in a certain way, designed to be a pretty good starting point for exposure.
If you are shooting film often, you may end up with your own preferences for how much to expose the film you are using, and that exposure might not match the speed on the box. I know a number of people who like to shoot "T-Max 100" at 50 ("overexpose" 1 stop) or shoot slide films like "Kodachrome 64" at 80, or "Velvia 50" at 64 ("underexpose" 1/3 stop). I put "overexpose" and "underexpose" in quotes because you are not really overexposing or underexposing, you are really exposing correctly just not using the exposure that it says on the box.
Your pictures will probably be overexposed by 1 stop. The effect depends on the type of film or sensor.
For negative films, overexposing is mostly OK and you may not notice. It will result in denser negatives, perhaps with more grain than you would like, and with more shadow detail. You can "pull process" the film to try and compensate--ask the processor to "pull one stop", but not all processors will support this, and the ones that do support it will probably charge you extra. If you are using black and white film you can just develop for a slightly shorter time, there are tables for your film and developer that will explain this. Pull processing is not necessary if you only overexposed by one stop, it is not a big deal. Some film/developer combinations notably recommend the same development time for normal development and pulling 1 stop!
For slide films, overexposing will result in a washed-out look with less vibrant colors. You generally want to avoid this, but it is not a disaster, and you can ask for pull process.
For digital, overexposure is usually a bit of a disaster, because it will blow out the highlights.
TL;DR: Since you are shooting a negative film, and only overexposing by one stop, you are probably fine and don't need to do anything.
Terminology
Pull processing: Ask the lab to develop less, to compensate for overexposed film. Not really necessary with only 1 stop of overexposure and negative film.
Push processing: The opposite of pull processing, when you ask the lab to develop extra to compensate for underexposed film.
Matter of Preference
Ultimately the ISO speed on the box is not actually a rule or even a recommendation for how much to expose the film! It is just a property of the film calculated in a certain way, designed to be a pretty good starting point for exposure.
If you are shooting film often, you may end up with your own preferences for how much to expose the film you are using, and that exposure might not match the speed on the box. I know a number of people who like to shoot "T-Max 100" at 50 ("overexpose" 1 stop) or shoot slide films like "Kodachrome 64" at 80, or "Velvia 50" at 64 ("underexpose" 1/3 stop). I put "overexpose" and "underexpose" in quotes because you are not really overexposing or underexposing, you are really exposing correctly just not using the exposure that it says on the box.
edited May 25 at 16:53
answered May 24 at 19:37
Dietrich EppDietrich Epp
63338
63338
4
Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:05
And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.
– dmckee
May 25 at 16:45
1
@xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.
– Dietrich Epp
May 25 at 16:55
add a comment |
4
Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:05
And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.
– dmckee
May 25 at 16:45
1
@xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.
– Dietrich Epp
May 25 at 16:55
4
4
Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:05
Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:05
And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.
– dmckee
May 25 at 16:45
And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.
– dmckee
May 25 at 16:45
1
1
@xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.
– Dietrich Epp
May 25 at 16:55
@xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.
– Dietrich Epp
May 25 at 16:55
add a comment |
I'm confused: have you just loaded the roll or have you exposed it? If you have just loaded it but not yet taken any pictures then just change the ISO setting on the camera to be right (ie to be 400). If you have exposed frames on it then I'd just use it at that speed: the negs will be overexposed by about a stop but that's mostly fine. You can get (some) labs to push or (in this case) pull-process film but this will probably cost you more than just buying another roll.
add a comment |
I'm confused: have you just loaded the roll or have you exposed it? If you have just loaded it but not yet taken any pictures then just change the ISO setting on the camera to be right (ie to be 400). If you have exposed frames on it then I'd just use it at that speed: the negs will be overexposed by about a stop but that's mostly fine. You can get (some) labs to push or (in this case) pull-process film but this will probably cost you more than just buying another roll.
add a comment |
I'm confused: have you just loaded the roll or have you exposed it? If you have just loaded it but not yet taken any pictures then just change the ISO setting on the camera to be right (ie to be 400). If you have exposed frames on it then I'd just use it at that speed: the negs will be overexposed by about a stop but that's mostly fine. You can get (some) labs to push or (in this case) pull-process film but this will probably cost you more than just buying another roll.
I'm confused: have you just loaded the roll or have you exposed it? If you have just loaded it but not yet taken any pictures then just change the ISO setting on the camera to be right (ie to be 400). If you have exposed frames on it then I'd just use it at that speed: the negs will be overexposed by about a stop but that's mostly fine. You can get (some) labs to push or (in this case) pull-process film but this will probably cost you more than just buying another roll.
answered May 24 at 10:16
tfbtfb
82318
82318
add a comment |
add a comment |
The absolute worst thing you can do with color negative film is underexpose it. Here's an example test using a different color-neg film (https://petapixel.com/2018/02/05/test-reveals-exposure-limits-kodak-portra-400-film/). All color-neg film is similar in this property.
So, you have loaded your 400 speed film into a camera that thinks it's metering for 200 speed film. This mean that you have, depending on your metering...
- With a perfectly metered shot, you've overexposed by 1 stop.
- With a slightly underexposed shot, you've actually shot at box speed for the film
- With a slightly overexposed shot, you've now overexposed by 2 stops.
In all of the cases above, your images will turn out just fine if you do absolutely nothing. Have the film developed normally and call it a day.
The reason for this is the film's latitude. As you can see in the linked article above, color-neg film will tolerate exposures from 0 (perfect exposure) to 4 stops over and still look good. It'll tolerate from -1 to +5 and still be usable.
ALL of your exposure leeway is on the positive side. I know some people who downrate their color-neg film (for example, shoot a 400 speed film as if it were 320) simply to force a slight overexposure in their shots - as this drastically limits the probability of an underexposed frame.
This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:01
add a comment |
The absolute worst thing you can do with color negative film is underexpose it. Here's an example test using a different color-neg film (https://petapixel.com/2018/02/05/test-reveals-exposure-limits-kodak-portra-400-film/). All color-neg film is similar in this property.
So, you have loaded your 400 speed film into a camera that thinks it's metering for 200 speed film. This mean that you have, depending on your metering...
- With a perfectly metered shot, you've overexposed by 1 stop.
- With a slightly underexposed shot, you've actually shot at box speed for the film
- With a slightly overexposed shot, you've now overexposed by 2 stops.
In all of the cases above, your images will turn out just fine if you do absolutely nothing. Have the film developed normally and call it a day.
The reason for this is the film's latitude. As you can see in the linked article above, color-neg film will tolerate exposures from 0 (perfect exposure) to 4 stops over and still look good. It'll tolerate from -1 to +5 and still be usable.
ALL of your exposure leeway is on the positive side. I know some people who downrate their color-neg film (for example, shoot a 400 speed film as if it were 320) simply to force a slight overexposure in their shots - as this drastically limits the probability of an underexposed frame.
This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:01
add a comment |
The absolute worst thing you can do with color negative film is underexpose it. Here's an example test using a different color-neg film (https://petapixel.com/2018/02/05/test-reveals-exposure-limits-kodak-portra-400-film/). All color-neg film is similar in this property.
So, you have loaded your 400 speed film into a camera that thinks it's metering for 200 speed film. This mean that you have, depending on your metering...
- With a perfectly metered shot, you've overexposed by 1 stop.
- With a slightly underexposed shot, you've actually shot at box speed for the film
- With a slightly overexposed shot, you've now overexposed by 2 stops.
In all of the cases above, your images will turn out just fine if you do absolutely nothing. Have the film developed normally and call it a day.
The reason for this is the film's latitude. As you can see in the linked article above, color-neg film will tolerate exposures from 0 (perfect exposure) to 4 stops over and still look good. It'll tolerate from -1 to +5 and still be usable.
ALL of your exposure leeway is on the positive side. I know some people who downrate their color-neg film (for example, shoot a 400 speed film as if it were 320) simply to force a slight overexposure in their shots - as this drastically limits the probability of an underexposed frame.
The absolute worst thing you can do with color negative film is underexpose it. Here's an example test using a different color-neg film (https://petapixel.com/2018/02/05/test-reveals-exposure-limits-kodak-portra-400-film/). All color-neg film is similar in this property.
So, you have loaded your 400 speed film into a camera that thinks it's metering for 200 speed film. This mean that you have, depending on your metering...
- With a perfectly metered shot, you've overexposed by 1 stop.
- With a slightly underexposed shot, you've actually shot at box speed for the film
- With a slightly overexposed shot, you've now overexposed by 2 stops.
In all of the cases above, your images will turn out just fine if you do absolutely nothing. Have the film developed normally and call it a day.
The reason for this is the film's latitude. As you can see in the linked article above, color-neg film will tolerate exposures from 0 (perfect exposure) to 4 stops over and still look good. It'll tolerate from -1 to +5 and still be usable.
ALL of your exposure leeway is on the positive side. I know some people who downrate their color-neg film (for example, shoot a 400 speed film as if it were 320) simply to force a slight overexposure in their shots - as this drastically limits the probability of an underexposed frame.
answered May 24 at 15:21
HuecoHueco
13.6k32963
13.6k32963
This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:01
add a comment |
This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:01
This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:01
This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.
– xiota
May 25 at 3:01
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108458%2fwhat-to-do-when-youve-set-the-wrong-iso-for-your-film%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead
– timvrhn
May 24 at 10:24
5
Have you exposed any of the film yet?
– Michael C
May 24 at 11:55