What to do when you've set the wrong ISO for your film?Where can I get 4x5″, 5x7″, or 8x10″ color sheet film (or other hard-to-find exotic film) processed?What is the relationship between film speed and shutter speed?How might the flash mode affect the exposure program on a point and shoot film camera? (Agfa Optima Sensor Flash)My roll of film didn't rewind inside all the wayWhat does Exposure bias in EXIF means? Fujifilm xt1 tag(0x9650)How do I calculate film ISO compensation for non–through-the-lens metering when using an ND filter?Can I use high ISO film in bright light (without problems)?Recommended ISO setting when shooting with Ilford Delta 400 Professional film?What is the relationship between film speed and the ISO setting on my film camera?How do I figure out what ISO to use when shooting film?

bash does not know the letter 'p'

What is the logic behind taxing money for property?

Explain the ending of Black Mirror's "Smithereens"

Fermat's statement about the ancients: How serious was he?

Why not invest in precious metals?

Should I put programming books I wrote a few years ago on my resume?

The Frozen Wastes

60s or 70s novel about Empire of Man making 1st contact with 1st discovered alien race

Return a String containing only alphabets without spaces

A map of non-pathological topology?

UTC timestamp format for launch vehicles

Is it possible for a vehicle to be manufactured without a catalytic converter?

Can a human be transformed into a Mind Flayer?

Can all groups be thought of as the symmetries of a geometrical object?

Non-aqueous eyes?

Why was this person allowed to become Grand Maester?

Why does this query, missing a FROM clause, not error out?

What is the color of artificial intelligence?

How can I use String in enum for Apex?

Generate basis elements of the Steenrod algebra

How to “listen” to existing circuit

How creative should the DM let an artificer be in terms of what they can build?

If I leave the US through an airport, do I have to return through the same airport?

What differences exist between adamantine and adamantite in all editions of D&D?



What to do when you've set the wrong ISO for your film?


Where can I get 4x5″, 5x7″, or 8x10″ color sheet film (or other hard-to-find exotic film) processed?What is the relationship between film speed and shutter speed?How might the flash mode affect the exposure program on a point and shoot film camera? (Agfa Optima Sensor Flash)My roll of film didn't rewind inside all the wayWhat does Exposure bias in EXIF means? Fujifilm xt1 tag(0x9650)How do I calculate film ISO compensation for non–through-the-lens metering when using an ND filter?Can I use high ISO film in bright light (without problems)?Recommended ISO setting when shooting with Ilford Delta 400 Professional film?What is the relationship between film speed and the ISO setting on my film camera?How do I figure out what ISO to use when shooting film?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7















I’ve put my Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 into my Minolta Hi-Matic 7 and I forgot to change the ISO setting for the new film. It’s set for the last roll at 200.



So what setting should I put for a normal sunny day, shaded afternoon, and night? When I develop it, what should I tell the lab?










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead

    – timvrhn
    May 24 at 10:24







  • 5





    Have you exposed any of the film yet?

    – Michael C
    May 24 at 11:55

















7















I’ve put my Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 into my Minolta Hi-Matic 7 and I forgot to change the ISO setting for the new film. It’s set for the last roll at 200.



So what setting should I put for a normal sunny day, shaded afternoon, and night? When I develop it, what should I tell the lab?










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead

    – timvrhn
    May 24 at 10:24







  • 5





    Have you exposed any of the film yet?

    – Michael C
    May 24 at 11:55













7












7








7


1






I’ve put my Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 into my Minolta Hi-Matic 7 and I forgot to change the ISO setting for the new film. It’s set for the last roll at 200.



So what setting should I put for a normal sunny day, shaded afternoon, and night? When I develop it, what should I tell the lab?










share|improve this question
















I’ve put my Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 into my Minolta Hi-Matic 7 and I forgot to change the ISO setting for the new film. It’s set for the last roll at 200.



So what setting should I put for a normal sunny day, shaded afternoon, and night? When I develop it, what should I tell the lab?







exposure film photography-basics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 24 at 15:27









Hueco

13.6k32963




13.6k32963










asked May 24 at 10:06









Gerard UntalanGerard Untalan

462




462







  • 6





    You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead

    – timvrhn
    May 24 at 10:24







  • 5





    Have you exposed any of the film yet?

    – Michael C
    May 24 at 11:55












  • 6





    You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead

    – timvrhn
    May 24 at 10:24







  • 5





    Have you exposed any of the film yet?

    – Michael C
    May 24 at 11:55







6




6





You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead

– timvrhn
May 24 at 10:24






You generally don't change the ISO depending on the lighting conditions. Setting the ISO just helps the camera's light meter in determining the right exposure. You change aperture/shutter speed instead

– timvrhn
May 24 at 10:24





5




5





Have you exposed any of the film yet?

– Michael C
May 24 at 11:55





Have you exposed any of the film yet?

– Michael C
May 24 at 11:55










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















10














Do not worry! Film has latitude -- it can tolerated a 2X error in exposure. Just continue as if nothing went wrong. Next time pay more attention to detail. Good Luck!






share|improve this answer






























    8














    Your pictures will probably be overexposed by 1 stop. The effect depends on the type of film or sensor.



    • For negative films, overexposing is mostly OK and you may not notice. It will result in denser negatives, perhaps with more grain than you would like, and with more shadow detail. You can "pull process" the film to try and compensate--ask the processor to "pull one stop", but not all processors will support this, and the ones that do support it will probably charge you extra. If you are using black and white film you can just develop for a slightly shorter time, there are tables for your film and developer that will explain this. Pull processing is not necessary if you only overexposed by one stop, it is not a big deal. Some film/developer combinations notably recommend the same development time for normal development and pulling 1 stop!


    • For slide films, overexposing will result in a washed-out look with less vibrant colors. You generally want to avoid this, but it is not a disaster, and you can ask for pull process.


    • For digital, overexposure is usually a bit of a disaster, because it will blow out the highlights.


    TL;DR: Since you are shooting a negative film, and only overexposing by one stop, you are probably fine and don't need to do anything.



    Terminology



    • Pull processing: Ask the lab to develop less, to compensate for overexposed film. Not really necessary with only 1 stop of overexposure and negative film.


    • Push processing: The opposite of pull processing, when you ask the lab to develop extra to compensate for underexposed film.


    Matter of Preference



    Ultimately the ISO speed on the box is not actually a rule or even a recommendation for how much to expose the film! It is just a property of the film calculated in a certain way, designed to be a pretty good starting point for exposure.



    If you are shooting film often, you may end up with your own preferences for how much to expose the film you are using, and that exposure might not match the speed on the box. I know a number of people who like to shoot "T-Max 100" at 50 ("overexpose" 1 stop) or shoot slide films like "Kodachrome 64" at 80, or "Velvia 50" at 64 ("underexpose" 1/3 stop). I put "overexpose" and "underexpose" in quotes because you are not really overexposing or underexposing, you are really exposing correctly just not using the exposure that it says on the box.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 4





      Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.

      – xiota
      May 25 at 3:05












    • And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.

      – dmckee
      May 25 at 16:45






    • 1





      @xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.

      – Dietrich Epp
      May 25 at 16:55


















    4














    I'm confused: have you just loaded the roll or have you exposed it? If you have just loaded it but not yet taken any pictures then just change the ISO setting on the camera to be right (ie to be 400). If you have exposed frames on it then I'd just use it at that speed: the negs will be overexposed by about a stop but that's mostly fine. You can get (some) labs to push or (in this case) pull-process film but this will probably cost you more than just buying another roll.






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      The absolute worst thing you can do with color negative film is underexpose it. Here's an example test using a different color-neg film (https://petapixel.com/2018/02/05/test-reveals-exposure-limits-kodak-portra-400-film/). All color-neg film is similar in this property.



      So, you have loaded your 400 speed film into a camera that thinks it's metering for 200 speed film. This mean that you have, depending on your metering...



      • With a perfectly metered shot, you've overexposed by 1 stop.

      • With a slightly underexposed shot, you've actually shot at box speed for the film

      • With a slightly overexposed shot, you've now overexposed by 2 stops.

      In all of the cases above, your images will turn out just fine if you do absolutely nothing. Have the film developed normally and call it a day.



      The reason for this is the film's latitude. As you can see in the linked article above, color-neg film will tolerate exposures from 0 (perfect exposure) to 4 stops over and still look good. It'll tolerate from -1 to +5 and still be usable.



      ALL of your exposure leeway is on the positive side. I know some people who downrate their color-neg film (for example, shoot a 400 speed film as if it were 320) simply to force a slight overexposure in their shots - as this drastically limits the probability of an underexposed frame.






      share|improve this answer























      • This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.

        – xiota
        May 25 at 3:01












      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "61"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108458%2fwhat-to-do-when-youve-set-the-wrong-iso-for-your-film%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      10














      Do not worry! Film has latitude -- it can tolerated a 2X error in exposure. Just continue as if nothing went wrong. Next time pay more attention to detail. Good Luck!






      share|improve this answer



























        10














        Do not worry! Film has latitude -- it can tolerated a 2X error in exposure. Just continue as if nothing went wrong. Next time pay more attention to detail. Good Luck!






        share|improve this answer

























          10












          10








          10







          Do not worry! Film has latitude -- it can tolerated a 2X error in exposure. Just continue as if nothing went wrong. Next time pay more attention to detail. Good Luck!






          share|improve this answer













          Do not worry! Film has latitude -- it can tolerated a 2X error in exposure. Just continue as if nothing went wrong. Next time pay more attention to detail. Good Luck!







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 24 at 13:33









          Alan MarcusAlan Marcus

          26.3k33062




          26.3k33062























              8














              Your pictures will probably be overexposed by 1 stop. The effect depends on the type of film or sensor.



              • For negative films, overexposing is mostly OK and you may not notice. It will result in denser negatives, perhaps with more grain than you would like, and with more shadow detail. You can "pull process" the film to try and compensate--ask the processor to "pull one stop", but not all processors will support this, and the ones that do support it will probably charge you extra. If you are using black and white film you can just develop for a slightly shorter time, there are tables for your film and developer that will explain this. Pull processing is not necessary if you only overexposed by one stop, it is not a big deal. Some film/developer combinations notably recommend the same development time for normal development and pulling 1 stop!


              • For slide films, overexposing will result in a washed-out look with less vibrant colors. You generally want to avoid this, but it is not a disaster, and you can ask for pull process.


              • For digital, overexposure is usually a bit of a disaster, because it will blow out the highlights.


              TL;DR: Since you are shooting a negative film, and only overexposing by one stop, you are probably fine and don't need to do anything.



              Terminology



              • Pull processing: Ask the lab to develop less, to compensate for overexposed film. Not really necessary with only 1 stop of overexposure and negative film.


              • Push processing: The opposite of pull processing, when you ask the lab to develop extra to compensate for underexposed film.


              Matter of Preference



              Ultimately the ISO speed on the box is not actually a rule or even a recommendation for how much to expose the film! It is just a property of the film calculated in a certain way, designed to be a pretty good starting point for exposure.



              If you are shooting film often, you may end up with your own preferences for how much to expose the film you are using, and that exposure might not match the speed on the box. I know a number of people who like to shoot "T-Max 100" at 50 ("overexpose" 1 stop) or shoot slide films like "Kodachrome 64" at 80, or "Velvia 50" at 64 ("underexpose" 1/3 stop). I put "overexpose" and "underexpose" in quotes because you are not really overexposing or underexposing, you are really exposing correctly just not using the exposure that it says on the box.






              share|improve this answer




















              • 4





                Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.

                – xiota
                May 25 at 3:05












              • And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.

                – dmckee
                May 25 at 16:45






              • 1





                @xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.

                – Dietrich Epp
                May 25 at 16:55















              8














              Your pictures will probably be overexposed by 1 stop. The effect depends on the type of film or sensor.



              • For negative films, overexposing is mostly OK and you may not notice. It will result in denser negatives, perhaps with more grain than you would like, and with more shadow detail. You can "pull process" the film to try and compensate--ask the processor to "pull one stop", but not all processors will support this, and the ones that do support it will probably charge you extra. If you are using black and white film you can just develop for a slightly shorter time, there are tables for your film and developer that will explain this. Pull processing is not necessary if you only overexposed by one stop, it is not a big deal. Some film/developer combinations notably recommend the same development time for normal development and pulling 1 stop!


              • For slide films, overexposing will result in a washed-out look with less vibrant colors. You generally want to avoid this, but it is not a disaster, and you can ask for pull process.


              • For digital, overexposure is usually a bit of a disaster, because it will blow out the highlights.


              TL;DR: Since you are shooting a negative film, and only overexposing by one stop, you are probably fine and don't need to do anything.



              Terminology



              • Pull processing: Ask the lab to develop less, to compensate for overexposed film. Not really necessary with only 1 stop of overexposure and negative film.


              • Push processing: The opposite of pull processing, when you ask the lab to develop extra to compensate for underexposed film.


              Matter of Preference



              Ultimately the ISO speed on the box is not actually a rule or even a recommendation for how much to expose the film! It is just a property of the film calculated in a certain way, designed to be a pretty good starting point for exposure.



              If you are shooting film often, you may end up with your own preferences for how much to expose the film you are using, and that exposure might not match the speed on the box. I know a number of people who like to shoot "T-Max 100" at 50 ("overexpose" 1 stop) or shoot slide films like "Kodachrome 64" at 80, or "Velvia 50" at 64 ("underexpose" 1/3 stop). I put "overexpose" and "underexpose" in quotes because you are not really overexposing or underexposing, you are really exposing correctly just not using the exposure that it says on the box.






              share|improve this answer




















              • 4





                Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.

                – xiota
                May 25 at 3:05












              • And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.

                – dmckee
                May 25 at 16:45






              • 1





                @xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.

                – Dietrich Epp
                May 25 at 16:55













              8












              8








              8







              Your pictures will probably be overexposed by 1 stop. The effect depends on the type of film or sensor.



              • For negative films, overexposing is mostly OK and you may not notice. It will result in denser negatives, perhaps with more grain than you would like, and with more shadow detail. You can "pull process" the film to try and compensate--ask the processor to "pull one stop", but not all processors will support this, and the ones that do support it will probably charge you extra. If you are using black and white film you can just develop for a slightly shorter time, there are tables for your film and developer that will explain this. Pull processing is not necessary if you only overexposed by one stop, it is not a big deal. Some film/developer combinations notably recommend the same development time for normal development and pulling 1 stop!


              • For slide films, overexposing will result in a washed-out look with less vibrant colors. You generally want to avoid this, but it is not a disaster, and you can ask for pull process.


              • For digital, overexposure is usually a bit of a disaster, because it will blow out the highlights.


              TL;DR: Since you are shooting a negative film, and only overexposing by one stop, you are probably fine and don't need to do anything.



              Terminology



              • Pull processing: Ask the lab to develop less, to compensate for overexposed film. Not really necessary with only 1 stop of overexposure and negative film.


              • Push processing: The opposite of pull processing, when you ask the lab to develop extra to compensate for underexposed film.


              Matter of Preference



              Ultimately the ISO speed on the box is not actually a rule or even a recommendation for how much to expose the film! It is just a property of the film calculated in a certain way, designed to be a pretty good starting point for exposure.



              If you are shooting film often, you may end up with your own preferences for how much to expose the film you are using, and that exposure might not match the speed on the box. I know a number of people who like to shoot "T-Max 100" at 50 ("overexpose" 1 stop) or shoot slide films like "Kodachrome 64" at 80, or "Velvia 50" at 64 ("underexpose" 1/3 stop). I put "overexpose" and "underexpose" in quotes because you are not really overexposing or underexposing, you are really exposing correctly just not using the exposure that it says on the box.






              share|improve this answer















              Your pictures will probably be overexposed by 1 stop. The effect depends on the type of film or sensor.



              • For negative films, overexposing is mostly OK and you may not notice. It will result in denser negatives, perhaps with more grain than you would like, and with more shadow detail. You can "pull process" the film to try and compensate--ask the processor to "pull one stop", but not all processors will support this, and the ones that do support it will probably charge you extra. If you are using black and white film you can just develop for a slightly shorter time, there are tables for your film and developer that will explain this. Pull processing is not necessary if you only overexposed by one stop, it is not a big deal. Some film/developer combinations notably recommend the same development time for normal development and pulling 1 stop!


              • For slide films, overexposing will result in a washed-out look with less vibrant colors. You generally want to avoid this, but it is not a disaster, and you can ask for pull process.


              • For digital, overexposure is usually a bit of a disaster, because it will blow out the highlights.


              TL;DR: Since you are shooting a negative film, and only overexposing by one stop, you are probably fine and don't need to do anything.



              Terminology



              • Pull processing: Ask the lab to develop less, to compensate for overexposed film. Not really necessary with only 1 stop of overexposure and negative film.


              • Push processing: The opposite of pull processing, when you ask the lab to develop extra to compensate for underexposed film.


              Matter of Preference



              Ultimately the ISO speed on the box is not actually a rule or even a recommendation for how much to expose the film! It is just a property of the film calculated in a certain way, designed to be a pretty good starting point for exposure.



              If you are shooting film often, you may end up with your own preferences for how much to expose the film you are using, and that exposure might not match the speed on the box. I know a number of people who like to shoot "T-Max 100" at 50 ("overexpose" 1 stop) or shoot slide films like "Kodachrome 64" at 80, or "Velvia 50" at 64 ("underexpose" 1/3 stop). I put "overexpose" and "underexpose" in quotes because you are not really overexposing or underexposing, you are really exposing correctly just not using the exposure that it says on the box.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited May 25 at 16:53

























              answered May 24 at 19:37









              Dietrich EppDietrich Epp

              63338




              63338







              • 4





                Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.

                – xiota
                May 25 at 3:05












              • And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.

                – dmckee
                May 25 at 16:45






              • 1





                @xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.

                – Dietrich Epp
                May 25 at 16:55












              • 4





                Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.

                – xiota
                May 25 at 3:05












              • And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.

                – dmckee
                May 25 at 16:45






              • 1





                @xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.

                – Dietrich Epp
                May 25 at 16:55







              4




              4





              Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.

              – xiota
              May 25 at 3:05






              Shouldn't TL;DR go at the beginning? Putting it in the middle means it won't get read because TL;DR.

              – xiota
              May 25 at 3:05














              And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.

              – dmckee
              May 25 at 16:45





              And thank you for bringing up the compensation during development options.

              – dmckee
              May 25 at 16:45




              1




              1





              @xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.

              – Dietrich Epp
              May 25 at 16:55





              @xiota: Readers who can’t even bother to read the bold headings are going to have a rough time anyway, so I put the TL;DR where it belongs in the flow instead of artificially putting it at the top.

              – Dietrich Epp
              May 25 at 16:55











              4














              I'm confused: have you just loaded the roll or have you exposed it? If you have just loaded it but not yet taken any pictures then just change the ISO setting on the camera to be right (ie to be 400). If you have exposed frames on it then I'd just use it at that speed: the negs will be overexposed by about a stop but that's mostly fine. You can get (some) labs to push or (in this case) pull-process film but this will probably cost you more than just buying another roll.






              share|improve this answer



























                4














                I'm confused: have you just loaded the roll or have you exposed it? If you have just loaded it but not yet taken any pictures then just change the ISO setting on the camera to be right (ie to be 400). If you have exposed frames on it then I'd just use it at that speed: the negs will be overexposed by about a stop but that's mostly fine. You can get (some) labs to push or (in this case) pull-process film but this will probably cost you more than just buying another roll.






                share|improve this answer

























                  4












                  4








                  4







                  I'm confused: have you just loaded the roll or have you exposed it? If you have just loaded it but not yet taken any pictures then just change the ISO setting on the camera to be right (ie to be 400). If you have exposed frames on it then I'd just use it at that speed: the negs will be overexposed by about a stop but that's mostly fine. You can get (some) labs to push or (in this case) pull-process film but this will probably cost you more than just buying another roll.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I'm confused: have you just loaded the roll or have you exposed it? If you have just loaded it but not yet taken any pictures then just change the ISO setting on the camera to be right (ie to be 400). If you have exposed frames on it then I'd just use it at that speed: the negs will be overexposed by about a stop but that's mostly fine. You can get (some) labs to push or (in this case) pull-process film but this will probably cost you more than just buying another roll.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 24 at 10:16









                  tfbtfb

                  82318




                  82318





















                      1














                      The absolute worst thing you can do with color negative film is underexpose it. Here's an example test using a different color-neg film (https://petapixel.com/2018/02/05/test-reveals-exposure-limits-kodak-portra-400-film/). All color-neg film is similar in this property.



                      So, you have loaded your 400 speed film into a camera that thinks it's metering for 200 speed film. This mean that you have, depending on your metering...



                      • With a perfectly metered shot, you've overexposed by 1 stop.

                      • With a slightly underexposed shot, you've actually shot at box speed for the film

                      • With a slightly overexposed shot, you've now overexposed by 2 stops.

                      In all of the cases above, your images will turn out just fine if you do absolutely nothing. Have the film developed normally and call it a day.



                      The reason for this is the film's latitude. As you can see in the linked article above, color-neg film will tolerate exposures from 0 (perfect exposure) to 4 stops over and still look good. It'll tolerate from -1 to +5 and still be usable.



                      ALL of your exposure leeway is on the positive side. I know some people who downrate their color-neg film (for example, shoot a 400 speed film as if it were 320) simply to force a slight overexposure in their shots - as this drastically limits the probability of an underexposed frame.






                      share|improve this answer























                      • This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.

                        – xiota
                        May 25 at 3:01
















                      1














                      The absolute worst thing you can do with color negative film is underexpose it. Here's an example test using a different color-neg film (https://petapixel.com/2018/02/05/test-reveals-exposure-limits-kodak-portra-400-film/). All color-neg film is similar in this property.



                      So, you have loaded your 400 speed film into a camera that thinks it's metering for 200 speed film. This mean that you have, depending on your metering...



                      • With a perfectly metered shot, you've overexposed by 1 stop.

                      • With a slightly underexposed shot, you've actually shot at box speed for the film

                      • With a slightly overexposed shot, you've now overexposed by 2 stops.

                      In all of the cases above, your images will turn out just fine if you do absolutely nothing. Have the film developed normally and call it a day.



                      The reason for this is the film's latitude. As you can see in the linked article above, color-neg film will tolerate exposures from 0 (perfect exposure) to 4 stops over and still look good. It'll tolerate from -1 to +5 and still be usable.



                      ALL of your exposure leeway is on the positive side. I know some people who downrate their color-neg film (for example, shoot a 400 speed film as if it were 320) simply to force a slight overexposure in their shots - as this drastically limits the probability of an underexposed frame.






                      share|improve this answer























                      • This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.

                        – xiota
                        May 25 at 3:01














                      1












                      1








                      1







                      The absolute worst thing you can do with color negative film is underexpose it. Here's an example test using a different color-neg film (https://petapixel.com/2018/02/05/test-reveals-exposure-limits-kodak-portra-400-film/). All color-neg film is similar in this property.



                      So, you have loaded your 400 speed film into a camera that thinks it's metering for 200 speed film. This mean that you have, depending on your metering...



                      • With a perfectly metered shot, you've overexposed by 1 stop.

                      • With a slightly underexposed shot, you've actually shot at box speed for the film

                      • With a slightly overexposed shot, you've now overexposed by 2 stops.

                      In all of the cases above, your images will turn out just fine if you do absolutely nothing. Have the film developed normally and call it a day.



                      The reason for this is the film's latitude. As you can see in the linked article above, color-neg film will tolerate exposures from 0 (perfect exposure) to 4 stops over and still look good. It'll tolerate from -1 to +5 and still be usable.



                      ALL of your exposure leeway is on the positive side. I know some people who downrate their color-neg film (for example, shoot a 400 speed film as if it were 320) simply to force a slight overexposure in their shots - as this drastically limits the probability of an underexposed frame.






                      share|improve this answer













                      The absolute worst thing you can do with color negative film is underexpose it. Here's an example test using a different color-neg film (https://petapixel.com/2018/02/05/test-reveals-exposure-limits-kodak-portra-400-film/). All color-neg film is similar in this property.



                      So, you have loaded your 400 speed film into a camera that thinks it's metering for 200 speed film. This mean that you have, depending on your metering...



                      • With a perfectly metered shot, you've overexposed by 1 stop.

                      • With a slightly underexposed shot, you've actually shot at box speed for the film

                      • With a slightly overexposed shot, you've now overexposed by 2 stops.

                      In all of the cases above, your images will turn out just fine if you do absolutely nothing. Have the film developed normally and call it a day.



                      The reason for this is the film's latitude. As you can see in the linked article above, color-neg film will tolerate exposures from 0 (perfect exposure) to 4 stops over and still look good. It'll tolerate from -1 to +5 and still be usable.



                      ALL of your exposure leeway is on the positive side. I know some people who downrate their color-neg film (for example, shoot a 400 speed film as if it were 320) simply to force a slight overexposure in their shots - as this drastically limits the probability of an underexposed frame.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered May 24 at 15:21









                      HuecoHueco

                      13.6k32963




                      13.6k32963












                      • This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.

                        – xiota
                        May 25 at 3:01


















                      • This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.

                        – xiota
                        May 25 at 3:01

















                      This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.

                      – xiota
                      May 25 at 3:01






                      This answer would make more sense if you move the first paragraph to the end. OP did not underexpose the film, but mentioning it first makes it seem as if you think he did, even though you note later that it's overexposed.

                      – xiota
                      May 25 at 3:01


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108458%2fwhat-to-do-when-youve-set-the-wrong-iso-for-your-film%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                      Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                      Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020