Correctly defining the return of a procedure The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?Defining a string based sort functionDefining functions in a loopReturn value of Reap when using tagsHow to define even permutations correctly?How to exclude some indices in defining Table?How to make a repetive procedure with LinearModelFitTable with List iterator return unpacked listreverse procedure of KroneckerProductDefine the substitution procedure as a functionRebuild a vector defining the sign of the elements

One-dimensional Japanese puzzle

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

Was credit for the black hole image misappropriated?

Homework question about an engine pulling a train

Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.

What force causes entropy to increase?

Simulating Exploding Dice

Is there a way to generate uniformly distributed points on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers per point?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Do warforged have souls?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

60's-70's movie: home appliances revolting against the owners

different output for groups and groups USERNAME after adding a username to a group

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Variable with quotation marks "$()"

How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?

Drawing vertical/oblique lines in Metrical tree (tikz-qtree, tipa)

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

Python - Fishing Simulator

Identify 80s or 90s comics with ripped creatures (not dwarves)

Huge performance difference of the command find with and without using %M option to show permissions

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?



Correctly defining the return of a procedure



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?Defining a string based sort functionDefining functions in a loopReturn value of Reap when using tagsHow to define even permutations correctly?How to exclude some indices in defining Table?How to make a repetive procedure with LinearModelFitTable with List iterator return unpacked listreverse procedure of KroneckerProductDefine the substitution procedure as a functionRebuild a vector defining the sign of the elements










3












$begingroup$


I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.



I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:



1- set $x_0 = 0.5$



2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.



This is what I came up with so far



x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,

x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)

];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)



but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)










share|improve this question







New contributor




JacquesLeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use Module, Block, or With for code blocks. And try not to use For.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    Apr 8 at 10:45






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    Apr 8 at 11:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Return doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    Apr 8 at 13:17










  • $begingroup$
    You might also look into Nest and NestList as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris K
    Apr 8 at 13:20










  • $begingroup$
    Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    17 hours ago















3












$begingroup$


I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.



I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:



1- set $x_0 = 0.5$



2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.



This is what I came up with so far



x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,

x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)

];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)



but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)










share|improve this question







New contributor




JacquesLeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use Module, Block, or With for code blocks. And try not to use For.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    Apr 8 at 10:45






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    Apr 8 at 11:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Return doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    Apr 8 at 13:17










  • $begingroup$
    You might also look into Nest and NestList as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris K
    Apr 8 at 13:20










  • $begingroup$
    Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    17 hours ago













3












3








3


0



$begingroup$


I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.



I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:



1- set $x_0 = 0.5$



2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.



This is what I came up with so far



x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,

x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)

];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)



but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)










share|improve this question







New contributor




JacquesLeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I am sort of new to mathematica and I am struggling with how to correctly set the return of a specific function which is a procedure.



I am give the following task:
Given the map $x_n+1 = r x_n (1-x_n)$:



1- set $x_0 = 0.5$



2- write a function $f(r)$ which evaluates the first 1000 terms fo the sequence, takes the last 100 and then selects distinct elements.



This is what I came up with so far



x[0] = 0.5
f[r_]:=
l = Table[0,1000]; (*init table of 1000 elems*)
l[[1]] = x[0]; (*set x_0*)
For[n=1,n<1000,n++,

x[n] = r * x[n-1] *(1-x[n-1]); (*evaluate x_n*)
l[[n+1]] = x[n]; (*set nth elem of list*)

];
l= Union[Take[l, -100]] (*modify list*)
Return[l] (*return list*)



but this does not work at all. thanks tho everyone who is keen to partecipate and give some suggestion :)







list-manipulation






share|improve this question







New contributor




JacquesLeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




JacquesLeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




JacquesLeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 8 at 9:54









JacquesLeenJacquesLeen

303




303




New contributor




JacquesLeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





JacquesLeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






JacquesLeen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use Module, Block, or With for code blocks. And try not to use For.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    Apr 8 at 10:45






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    Apr 8 at 11:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Return doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    Apr 8 at 13:17










  • $begingroup$
    You might also look into Nest and NestList as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris K
    Apr 8 at 13:20










  • $begingroup$
    Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    17 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use Module, Block, or With for code blocks. And try not to use For.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    Apr 8 at 10:45






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
    $endgroup$
    – corey979
    Apr 8 at 11:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Return doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    Apr 8 at 13:17










  • $begingroup$
    You might also look into Nest and NestList as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris K
    Apr 8 at 13:20










  • $begingroup$
    Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
    $endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    17 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use Module, Block, or With for code blocks. And try not to use For.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 8 at 10:45




$begingroup$
Curly braces are for lists, not for code blocks. Use Module, Block, or With for code blocks. And try not to use For.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 8 at 10:45




3




3




$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
Apr 8 at 11:34




$begingroup$
Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?
$endgroup$
– corey979
Apr 8 at 11:34




1




1




$begingroup$
Return doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
$endgroup$
– John Doty
Apr 8 at 13:17




$begingroup$
Return doesn't do what you think it does. Don't use it until you understand it. Once you understand it, you'll probably never use it.
$endgroup$
– John Doty
Apr 8 at 13:17












$begingroup$
You might also look into Nest and NestList as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
$endgroup$
– Chris K
Apr 8 at 13:20




$begingroup$
You might also look into Nest and NestList as an alternative, built-in way to iterate this map.
$endgroup$
– Chris K
Apr 8 at 13:20












$begingroup$
Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
17 hours ago




$begingroup$
Don't just guess at the syntax, read a tutorial. Plenty can be found with a simple websearch.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
17 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Try this:



f[r_] := Union[
Take[
RecurrenceTable[
a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
a, n, 1, 1000
],
-100]
]





share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Or, a little more efficiently, f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
    $endgroup$
    – Bob Hanlon
    Apr 8 at 13:50


















3












$begingroup$

For a specific value of $r$ you can do



With[r = 3.7,
NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]



0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923




I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:



With[r = 3.5,
NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort



0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997




// Union does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort if you prefer.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194802%2fcorrectly-defining-the-return-of-a-procedure%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    Try this:



    f[r_] := Union[
    Take[
    RecurrenceTable[
    a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
    a, n, 1, 1000
    ],
    -100]
    ]





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Or, a little more efficiently, f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
      $endgroup$
      – Bob Hanlon
      Apr 8 at 13:50















    6












    $begingroup$

    Try this:



    f[r_] := Union[
    Take[
    RecurrenceTable[
    a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
    a, n, 1, 1000
    ],
    -100]
    ]





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Or, a little more efficiently, f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
      $endgroup$
      – Bob Hanlon
      Apr 8 at 13:50













    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    Try this:



    f[r_] := Union[
    Take[
    RecurrenceTable[
    a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
    a, n, 1, 1000
    ],
    -100]
    ]





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Try this:



    f[r_] := Union[
    Take[
    RecurrenceTable[
    a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == .5,
    a, n, 1, 1000
    ],
    -100]
    ]






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 8 at 13:08









    MarcoB

    38.7k557116




    38.7k557116










    answered Apr 8 at 10:29









    Innerw0lfInnerw0lf

    814




    814







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Or, a little more efficiently, f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
      $endgroup$
      – Bob Hanlon
      Apr 8 at 13:50












    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Or, a little more efficiently, f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
      $endgroup$
      – Bob Hanlon
      Apr 8 at 13:50







    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Or, a little more efficiently, f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
    $endgroup$
    – Bob Hanlon
    Apr 8 at 13:50




    $begingroup$
    Or, a little more efficiently, f[r_] := Union[ RecurrenceTable[a[n + 1] == r*(1 - a[n])*a[n], a[1] == 0.5, a, n, 901, 1000]]
    $endgroup$
    – Bob Hanlon
    Apr 8 at 13:50











    3












    $begingroup$

    For a specific value of $r$ you can do



    With[r = 3.7,
    NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]



    0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
    0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
    0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
    0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
    0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
    0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
    0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
    0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
    0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
    0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
    0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
    0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
    0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
    0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
    0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923




    I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:



    With[r = 3.5,
    NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort



    0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997




    // Union does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort if you prefer.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      For a specific value of $r$ you can do



      With[r = 3.7,
      NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]



      0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
      0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
      0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
      0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
      0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
      0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
      0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
      0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
      0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
      0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
      0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
      0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
      0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
      0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
      0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923




      I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:



      With[r = 3.5,
      NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort



      0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997




      // Union does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort if you prefer.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        For a specific value of $r$ you can do



        With[r = 3.7,
        NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]



        0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
        0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
        0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
        0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
        0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
        0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
        0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
        0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
        0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
        0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
        0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
        0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
        0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
        0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
        0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923




        I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:



        With[r = 3.5,
        NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort



        0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997




        // Union does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort if you prefer.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        For a specific value of $r$ you can do



        With[r = 3.7,
        NestList[r*#*(1-#) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]]



        0.783499, 0.627626, 0.864733, 0.432788, 0.908285, 0.308222,
        0.788918, 0.616148, 0.875086, 0.404449, 0.891219, 0.358706, 0.851134,
        0.468809, 0.9214, 0.26796, 0.725783, 0.736382, 0.718257, 0.748746,
        0.696065, 0.782767, 0.629159, 0.863277, 0.436711, 0.910179, 0.302485,
        0.780655, 0.63356, 0.858998, 0.448145, 0.915051, 0.287611, 0.758096,
        0.67853, 0.80707, 0.576119, 0.903562, 0.32241, 0.808309, 0.573299,
        0.905121, 0.317745, 0.802098, 0.587326, 0.896784, 0.34248, 0.833193,
        0.514234, 0.92425, 0.259043, 0.710177, 0.761555, 0.67188, 0.815692,
        0.556253, 0.913292, 0.293003, 0.766463, 0.662291, 0.827548, 0.528036,
        0.922092, 0.265802, 0.722061, 0.74255, 0.707328, 0.765957, 0.663288,
        0.826347, 0.530942, 0.921458, 0.267782, 0.725477, 0.736893, 0.717362,
        0.750189, 0.6934, 0.786607, 0.621069, 0.870766, 0.41637, 0.899122,
        0.335595, 0.824992, 0.534206, 0.920671, 0.270233, 0.729667, 0.729837,
        0.729548, 0.730039, 0.729203, 0.730623, 0.728207, 0.732309, 0.72532,
        0.737154, 0.716905, 0.750923




        I don't think there are any duplicates in this list ($r$ is in the chaotic region). For other values of $r$ there are indeed duplicates:



        With[r = 3.5,
        NestList[r*#*(1 - #) &, 0.5, 1000][[-100 ;;]]] // DeleteDuplicates // Sort



        0.38282, 0.500884, 0.826941, 0.874997




        // Union does the same thing as // DeleteDuplicates // Sort if you prefer.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 8 at 15:04

























        answered Apr 8 at 14:01









        RomanRoman

        5,20011131




        5,20011131




















            JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            JacquesLeen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194802%2fcorrectly-defining-the-return-of-a-procedure%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

            Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

            What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company