Language whose intersection with a CFL is always a CFL The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraIf $L_1$ is regular and $L_1 cap L_2$ context-free, is $L_2$ always context-free?Can every context free language written as a intersection of another context free language and a regular language?Intersection of a language with a regular language imply context freeProving/Disproving that language L is non-regular/CFLLower bound for number of nonterminals in a CFGIs intersection of regular language and context free language is “always” context free languageProof Idea: How to prove the intersection of regular language and CFL is a CFL?CFL Intersection with Regular Language proveGiven a CFL L and a regular language R, is $overlineL cap R = emptyset$ decidable or undecidable?Is a kind of reverse Kleene star of a context-free language context-free?
Do warforged have souls?
What is the role of 'For' here?
How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?
Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary
Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?
Sort list of array linked objects by keys and values
Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?
Word to describe a time interval
One-dimensional Japanese puzzle
Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive
What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?
Can each chord in a progression create its own key?
different output for groups and groups USERNAME after adding a username to a group
Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
Language whose intersection with a CFL is always a CFL
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraIf $L_1$ is regular and $L_1 cap L_2$ context-free, is $L_2$ always context-free?Can every context free language written as a intersection of another context free language and a regular language?Intersection of a language with a regular language imply context freeProving/Disproving that language L is non-regular/CFLLower bound for number of nonterminals in a CFGIs intersection of regular language and context free language is “always” context free languageProof Idea: How to prove the intersection of regular language and CFL is a CFL?CFL Intersection with Regular Language proveGiven a CFL L and a regular language R, is $overlineL cap R = emptyset$ decidable or undecidable?Is a kind of reverse Kleene star of a context-free language context-free?
$begingroup$
Prove or disprove: If the language $L$ is such that for every context-free language $L_0$, the language $L cap L_0$ is context-free, then $L$ is regular.
I haven't managed to prove this, but I'm pretty sure there is no counterexample.
formal-languages regular-languages context-free
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove or disprove: If the language $L$ is such that for every context-free language $L_0$, the language $L cap L_0$ is context-free, then $L$ is regular.
I haven't managed to prove this, but I'm pretty sure there is no counterexample.
formal-languages regular-languages context-free
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove or disprove: If the language $L$ is such that for every context-free language $L_0$, the language $L cap L_0$ is context-free, then $L$ is regular.
I haven't managed to prove this, but I'm pretty sure there is no counterexample.
formal-languages regular-languages context-free
New contributor
$endgroup$
Prove or disprove: If the language $L$ is such that for every context-free language $L_0$, the language $L cap L_0$ is context-free, then $L$ is regular.
I haven't managed to prove this, but I'm pretty sure there is no counterexample.
formal-languages regular-languages context-free
formal-languages regular-languages context-free
New contributor
New contributor
edited Apr 8 at 12:34
Yuval Filmus
196k15185349
196k15185349
New contributor
asked Apr 8 at 12:29
Matan HalfonMatan Halfon
91
91
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $L = a^n b^n : n geq 0$, and let $L_0$ be an arbitrary context-free language. Define $L_1 = L_0 cap a^* b^*$, and note that $L_1$ is context-free and $L cap L_0 = L cap L_1$. Let $S = (i,j) : a^i b^j in L_1$.
According to Parikh's theorem, the set $S$ is semilinear. The set $D = (n,n) geq 0$ is also semilinear (in fact, it is linear). Since the semilinear sets are closed under intersection, $S cap D$ is also semilinear. Since $S cap D$ is (essentially) one-dimensional, it is eventually periodic. This shows that there is a finite language $F$, a modulus $m geq 1$ and a subset $A subseteq 0,ldots,m-1$ such that
$$
L cap L_1 = F Delta a^n b^n : n bmod m in A ,
$$
where $Delta$ is symmetric difference. It is easy to check that $a^nb^n : n bmod m in A$ is context-free, and so $L cap L_1$ is context-free.
Summarizing, we have shown that $L$ is a non-regular language which satisfies your condition.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
i dont know (or allowed )to use the Parikj's theorem there is any way you can show it without the linearity, thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– Matan Halfon
Apr 8 at 17:26
$begingroup$
Unfortunately I don’t care about this sort of artificial constraint. In mathematics we can use everything we know.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 17:27
$begingroup$
If you don't know something, why not look it up? Be curious.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 21:42
$begingroup$
I wrote this once before but it must've vanished in the ether: your $L$ is context-free. So what am I missing here?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 9 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@Kai: $L$ is indeed context-free, but it is not regular, while the claim in the OP is that every context-free language fulfilling the stated conditions must be regular. So $L$ is a counterxample to that claim.
$endgroup$
– Peter Leupold
Apr 9 at 12:17
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Matan Halfon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106657%2flanguage-whose-intersection-with-a-cfl-is-always-a-cfl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $L = a^n b^n : n geq 0$, and let $L_0$ be an arbitrary context-free language. Define $L_1 = L_0 cap a^* b^*$, and note that $L_1$ is context-free and $L cap L_0 = L cap L_1$. Let $S = (i,j) : a^i b^j in L_1$.
According to Parikh's theorem, the set $S$ is semilinear. The set $D = (n,n) geq 0$ is also semilinear (in fact, it is linear). Since the semilinear sets are closed under intersection, $S cap D$ is also semilinear. Since $S cap D$ is (essentially) one-dimensional, it is eventually periodic. This shows that there is a finite language $F$, a modulus $m geq 1$ and a subset $A subseteq 0,ldots,m-1$ such that
$$
L cap L_1 = F Delta a^n b^n : n bmod m in A ,
$$
where $Delta$ is symmetric difference. It is easy to check that $a^nb^n : n bmod m in A$ is context-free, and so $L cap L_1$ is context-free.
Summarizing, we have shown that $L$ is a non-regular language which satisfies your condition.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
i dont know (or allowed )to use the Parikj's theorem there is any way you can show it without the linearity, thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– Matan Halfon
Apr 8 at 17:26
$begingroup$
Unfortunately I don’t care about this sort of artificial constraint. In mathematics we can use everything we know.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 17:27
$begingroup$
If you don't know something, why not look it up? Be curious.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 21:42
$begingroup$
I wrote this once before but it must've vanished in the ether: your $L$ is context-free. So what am I missing here?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 9 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@Kai: $L$ is indeed context-free, but it is not regular, while the claim in the OP is that every context-free language fulfilling the stated conditions must be regular. So $L$ is a counterxample to that claim.
$endgroup$
– Peter Leupold
Apr 9 at 12:17
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $L = a^n b^n : n geq 0$, and let $L_0$ be an arbitrary context-free language. Define $L_1 = L_0 cap a^* b^*$, and note that $L_1$ is context-free and $L cap L_0 = L cap L_1$. Let $S = (i,j) : a^i b^j in L_1$.
According to Parikh's theorem, the set $S$ is semilinear. The set $D = (n,n) geq 0$ is also semilinear (in fact, it is linear). Since the semilinear sets are closed under intersection, $S cap D$ is also semilinear. Since $S cap D$ is (essentially) one-dimensional, it is eventually periodic. This shows that there is a finite language $F$, a modulus $m geq 1$ and a subset $A subseteq 0,ldots,m-1$ such that
$$
L cap L_1 = F Delta a^n b^n : n bmod m in A ,
$$
where $Delta$ is symmetric difference. It is easy to check that $a^nb^n : n bmod m in A$ is context-free, and so $L cap L_1$ is context-free.
Summarizing, we have shown that $L$ is a non-regular language which satisfies your condition.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
i dont know (or allowed )to use the Parikj's theorem there is any way you can show it without the linearity, thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– Matan Halfon
Apr 8 at 17:26
$begingroup$
Unfortunately I don’t care about this sort of artificial constraint. In mathematics we can use everything we know.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 17:27
$begingroup$
If you don't know something, why not look it up? Be curious.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 21:42
$begingroup$
I wrote this once before but it must've vanished in the ether: your $L$ is context-free. So what am I missing here?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 9 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@Kai: $L$ is indeed context-free, but it is not regular, while the claim in the OP is that every context-free language fulfilling the stated conditions must be regular. So $L$ is a counterxample to that claim.
$endgroup$
– Peter Leupold
Apr 9 at 12:17
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $L = a^n b^n : n geq 0$, and let $L_0$ be an arbitrary context-free language. Define $L_1 = L_0 cap a^* b^*$, and note that $L_1$ is context-free and $L cap L_0 = L cap L_1$. Let $S = (i,j) : a^i b^j in L_1$.
According to Parikh's theorem, the set $S$ is semilinear. The set $D = (n,n) geq 0$ is also semilinear (in fact, it is linear). Since the semilinear sets are closed under intersection, $S cap D$ is also semilinear. Since $S cap D$ is (essentially) one-dimensional, it is eventually periodic. This shows that there is a finite language $F$, a modulus $m geq 1$ and a subset $A subseteq 0,ldots,m-1$ such that
$$
L cap L_1 = F Delta a^n b^n : n bmod m in A ,
$$
where $Delta$ is symmetric difference. It is easy to check that $a^nb^n : n bmod m in A$ is context-free, and so $L cap L_1$ is context-free.
Summarizing, we have shown that $L$ is a non-regular language which satisfies your condition.
$endgroup$
Let $L = a^n b^n : n geq 0$, and let $L_0$ be an arbitrary context-free language. Define $L_1 = L_0 cap a^* b^*$, and note that $L_1$ is context-free and $L cap L_0 = L cap L_1$. Let $S = (i,j) : a^i b^j in L_1$.
According to Parikh's theorem, the set $S$ is semilinear. The set $D = (n,n) geq 0$ is also semilinear (in fact, it is linear). Since the semilinear sets are closed under intersection, $S cap D$ is also semilinear. Since $S cap D$ is (essentially) one-dimensional, it is eventually periodic. This shows that there is a finite language $F$, a modulus $m geq 1$ and a subset $A subseteq 0,ldots,m-1$ such that
$$
L cap L_1 = F Delta a^n b^n : n bmod m in A ,
$$
where $Delta$ is symmetric difference. It is easy to check that $a^nb^n : n bmod m in A$ is context-free, and so $L cap L_1$ is context-free.
Summarizing, we have shown that $L$ is a non-regular language which satisfies your condition.
edited Apr 9 at 5:03
answered Apr 8 at 12:44
Yuval FilmusYuval Filmus
196k15185349
196k15185349
$begingroup$
i dont know (or allowed )to use the Parikj's theorem there is any way you can show it without the linearity, thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– Matan Halfon
Apr 8 at 17:26
$begingroup$
Unfortunately I don’t care about this sort of artificial constraint. In mathematics we can use everything we know.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 17:27
$begingroup$
If you don't know something, why not look it up? Be curious.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 21:42
$begingroup$
I wrote this once before but it must've vanished in the ether: your $L$ is context-free. So what am I missing here?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 9 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@Kai: $L$ is indeed context-free, but it is not regular, while the claim in the OP is that every context-free language fulfilling the stated conditions must be regular. So $L$ is a counterxample to that claim.
$endgroup$
– Peter Leupold
Apr 9 at 12:17
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
i dont know (or allowed )to use the Parikj's theorem there is any way you can show it without the linearity, thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– Matan Halfon
Apr 8 at 17:26
$begingroup$
Unfortunately I don’t care about this sort of artificial constraint. In mathematics we can use everything we know.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 17:27
$begingroup$
If you don't know something, why not look it up? Be curious.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 21:42
$begingroup$
I wrote this once before but it must've vanished in the ether: your $L$ is context-free. So what am I missing here?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 9 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@Kai: $L$ is indeed context-free, but it is not regular, while the claim in the OP is that every context-free language fulfilling the stated conditions must be regular. So $L$ is a counterxample to that claim.
$endgroup$
– Peter Leupold
Apr 9 at 12:17
$begingroup$
i dont know (or allowed )to use the Parikj's theorem there is any way you can show it without the linearity, thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– Matan Halfon
Apr 8 at 17:26
$begingroup$
i dont know (or allowed )to use the Parikj's theorem there is any way you can show it without the linearity, thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– Matan Halfon
Apr 8 at 17:26
$begingroup$
Unfortunately I don’t care about this sort of artificial constraint. In mathematics we can use everything we know.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 17:27
$begingroup$
Unfortunately I don’t care about this sort of artificial constraint. In mathematics we can use everything we know.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 17:27
$begingroup$
If you don't know something, why not look it up? Be curious.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 21:42
$begingroup$
If you don't know something, why not look it up? Be curious.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 21:42
$begingroup$
I wrote this once before but it must've vanished in the ether: your $L$ is context-free. So what am I missing here?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 9 at 12:13
$begingroup$
I wrote this once before but it must've vanished in the ether: your $L$ is context-free. So what am I missing here?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 9 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@Kai: $L$ is indeed context-free, but it is not regular, while the claim in the OP is that every context-free language fulfilling the stated conditions must be regular. So $L$ is a counterxample to that claim.
$endgroup$
– Peter Leupold
Apr 9 at 12:17
$begingroup$
@Kai: $L$ is indeed context-free, but it is not regular, while the claim in the OP is that every context-free language fulfilling the stated conditions must be regular. So $L$ is a counterxample to that claim.
$endgroup$
– Peter Leupold
Apr 9 at 12:17
|
show 2 more comments
Matan Halfon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Matan Halfon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Matan Halfon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Matan Halfon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106657%2flanguage-whose-intersection-with-a-cfl-is-always-a-cfl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown