How many permutations does a countable set have? [duplicate] The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is symmetric group on natural numbers countable?Prove why this algorithm to compute all list permutations worksLooks like we picked the wrong theorem to popularize (Cantor diagonalization)Can someone please clarify combinations vs permutations?Mapping from reals to naturals if naturals can be used infinitely many timesWhy are positive rational numbers countable but real numbers are not?Is there a model of ZFC in which every real number is definable?Series that converge to every real number via permutationSeries and ConsistencyThe set of all digits in a real numberExplicit bijection between $Bbb R$ and permutations of $Bbb N$
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?
How to make Illustrator type tool selection automatically adapt with text length
Can a flute soloist sit?
Huge performance difference of the command find with and without using %M option to show permissions
Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments
Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive
How to handle characters who are more educated than the author?
Could an empire control the whole planet with today's comunication methods?
Make it rain characters
How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?
Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
Presidential Pardon
Store Dynamic-accessible hidden metadata in a cell
How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?
Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary
Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?
What is the padding with red substance inside of steak packaging?
My body leaves; my core can stay
How many permutations does a countable set have? [duplicate]
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is symmetric group on natural numbers countable?Prove why this algorithm to compute all list permutations worksLooks like we picked the wrong theorem to popularize (Cantor diagonalization)Can someone please clarify combinations vs permutations?Mapping from reals to naturals if naturals can be used infinitely many timesWhy are positive rational numbers countable but real numbers are not?Is there a model of ZFC in which every real number is definable?Series that converge to every real number via permutationSeries and ConsistencyThe set of all digits in a real numberExplicit bijection between $Bbb R$ and permutations of $Bbb N$
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Is symmetric group on natural numbers countable?
8 answers
I have just come across the Riemann Rearrangement theorem and, from what I understand, it shows that any real can be written as a permutation of a conditionally convergent series. The problem I have is that permutations of an infinite series are countably infinite, so in theory one could list all possible permutations of the series which would be equivalent to listing all real numbers. But reals are uncountable.
This seems like a contradiction to me, where am I wrong?
permutations real-numbers
New contributor
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by Asaf Karagila♦ Apr 8 at 12:37
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Is symmetric group on natural numbers countable?
8 answers
I have just come across the Riemann Rearrangement theorem and, from what I understand, it shows that any real can be written as a permutation of a conditionally convergent series. The problem I have is that permutations of an infinite series are countably infinite, so in theory one could list all possible permutations of the series which would be equivalent to listing all real numbers. But reals are uncountable.
This seems like a contradiction to me, where am I wrong?
permutations real-numbers
New contributor
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by Asaf Karagila♦ Apr 8 at 12:37
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
$begingroup$
While the motivation for this question is the rearrangement theorem, the title should reflect the actual question instead.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Apr 8 at 12:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Is symmetric group on natural numbers countable?
8 answers
I have just come across the Riemann Rearrangement theorem and, from what I understand, it shows that any real can be written as a permutation of a conditionally convergent series. The problem I have is that permutations of an infinite series are countably infinite, so in theory one could list all possible permutations of the series which would be equivalent to listing all real numbers. But reals are uncountable.
This seems like a contradiction to me, where am I wrong?
permutations real-numbers
New contributor
$endgroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Is symmetric group on natural numbers countable?
8 answers
I have just come across the Riemann Rearrangement theorem and, from what I understand, it shows that any real can be written as a permutation of a conditionally convergent series. The problem I have is that permutations of an infinite series are countably infinite, so in theory one could list all possible permutations of the series which would be equivalent to listing all real numbers. But reals are uncountable.
This seems like a contradiction to me, where am I wrong?
This question already has an answer here:
Is symmetric group on natural numbers countable?
8 answers
permutations real-numbers
permutations real-numbers
New contributor
New contributor
edited Apr 8 at 12:38
Asaf Karagila♦
308k33441775
308k33441775
New contributor
asked Apr 8 at 10:53
Lorenzo Lorenzo
184
184
New contributor
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Asaf Karagila♦ Apr 8 at 12:37
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Asaf Karagila♦ Apr 8 at 12:37
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
$begingroup$
While the motivation for this question is the rearrangement theorem, the title should reflect the actual question instead.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Apr 8 at 12:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While the motivation for this question is the rearrangement theorem, the title should reflect the actual question instead.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Apr 8 at 12:38
$begingroup$
While the motivation for this question is the rearrangement theorem, the title should reflect the actual question instead.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Apr 8 at 12:38
$begingroup$
While the motivation for this question is the rearrangement theorem, the title should reflect the actual question instead.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Apr 8 at 12:38
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Permutations of an infinite series are not countably infinite, so there is no contradiction.
The set of permutations of an infinite series is the set of all bijections from $mathbb N$ to $mathbb N$, which is an uncountably infinite set. For one, the Riemann theorem you state can be used to prove that it is uncountable, or, more set-theoretically, a variant of the diagonal argument can be used, as in this post
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok that makes sense, but I thought one could list all permutations by having permutations of different 'lengths' n (that permutate only the first n terms, where all permutations of length n are finite) and then listing each one after the other ie all permutations of length 1, all permutations of length 2 etc.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:07
1
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo There is no "length" to speak of here. Each permutation is a permutation of "infinite" length, if you will. It is a rearangement of the entire set $mathbb N$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:08
$begingroup$
just saying length n as in all other terms beyond n are not changed eg. (13245678...) would be of length 3
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo For example, when, in your listing, to you list the permutation that maps $1$ to $2$, $2$ to $1$, $3$ to $4$, $4$ to $3$, $2k-1$ to $2k$ and $2k$ to $2k-1$?. There is no $n$ at which all terms beyond $n$ are unchanged! Every integer gets moved either one up or one down.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:13
$begingroup$
Ok I get it now, thanks
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:20
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Permutations of an infinite series are not countably infinite, so there is no contradiction.
The set of permutations of an infinite series is the set of all bijections from $mathbb N$ to $mathbb N$, which is an uncountably infinite set. For one, the Riemann theorem you state can be used to prove that it is uncountable, or, more set-theoretically, a variant of the diagonal argument can be used, as in this post
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok that makes sense, but I thought one could list all permutations by having permutations of different 'lengths' n (that permutate only the first n terms, where all permutations of length n are finite) and then listing each one after the other ie all permutations of length 1, all permutations of length 2 etc.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:07
1
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo There is no "length" to speak of here. Each permutation is a permutation of "infinite" length, if you will. It is a rearangement of the entire set $mathbb N$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:08
$begingroup$
just saying length n as in all other terms beyond n are not changed eg. (13245678...) would be of length 3
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo For example, when, in your listing, to you list the permutation that maps $1$ to $2$, $2$ to $1$, $3$ to $4$, $4$ to $3$, $2k-1$ to $2k$ and $2k$ to $2k-1$?. There is no $n$ at which all terms beyond $n$ are unchanged! Every integer gets moved either one up or one down.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:13
$begingroup$
Ok I get it now, thanks
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Permutations of an infinite series are not countably infinite, so there is no contradiction.
The set of permutations of an infinite series is the set of all bijections from $mathbb N$ to $mathbb N$, which is an uncountably infinite set. For one, the Riemann theorem you state can be used to prove that it is uncountable, or, more set-theoretically, a variant of the diagonal argument can be used, as in this post
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok that makes sense, but I thought one could list all permutations by having permutations of different 'lengths' n (that permutate only the first n terms, where all permutations of length n are finite) and then listing each one after the other ie all permutations of length 1, all permutations of length 2 etc.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:07
1
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo There is no "length" to speak of here. Each permutation is a permutation of "infinite" length, if you will. It is a rearangement of the entire set $mathbb N$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:08
$begingroup$
just saying length n as in all other terms beyond n are not changed eg. (13245678...) would be of length 3
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo For example, when, in your listing, to you list the permutation that maps $1$ to $2$, $2$ to $1$, $3$ to $4$, $4$ to $3$, $2k-1$ to $2k$ and $2k$ to $2k-1$?. There is no $n$ at which all terms beyond $n$ are unchanged! Every integer gets moved either one up or one down.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:13
$begingroup$
Ok I get it now, thanks
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Permutations of an infinite series are not countably infinite, so there is no contradiction.
The set of permutations of an infinite series is the set of all bijections from $mathbb N$ to $mathbb N$, which is an uncountably infinite set. For one, the Riemann theorem you state can be used to prove that it is uncountable, or, more set-theoretically, a variant of the diagonal argument can be used, as in this post
$endgroup$
Permutations of an infinite series are not countably infinite, so there is no contradiction.
The set of permutations of an infinite series is the set of all bijections from $mathbb N$ to $mathbb N$, which is an uncountably infinite set. For one, the Riemann theorem you state can be used to prove that it is uncountable, or, more set-theoretically, a variant of the diagonal argument can be used, as in this post
answered Apr 8 at 10:57
5xum5xum
92.6k394162
92.6k394162
$begingroup$
Ok that makes sense, but I thought one could list all permutations by having permutations of different 'lengths' n (that permutate only the first n terms, where all permutations of length n are finite) and then listing each one after the other ie all permutations of length 1, all permutations of length 2 etc.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:07
1
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo There is no "length" to speak of here. Each permutation is a permutation of "infinite" length, if you will. It is a rearangement of the entire set $mathbb N$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:08
$begingroup$
just saying length n as in all other terms beyond n are not changed eg. (13245678...) would be of length 3
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo For example, when, in your listing, to you list the permutation that maps $1$ to $2$, $2$ to $1$, $3$ to $4$, $4$ to $3$, $2k-1$ to $2k$ and $2k$ to $2k-1$?. There is no $n$ at which all terms beyond $n$ are unchanged! Every integer gets moved either one up or one down.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:13
$begingroup$
Ok I get it now, thanks
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Ok that makes sense, but I thought one could list all permutations by having permutations of different 'lengths' n (that permutate only the first n terms, where all permutations of length n are finite) and then listing each one after the other ie all permutations of length 1, all permutations of length 2 etc.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:07
1
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo There is no "length" to speak of here. Each permutation is a permutation of "infinite" length, if you will. It is a rearangement of the entire set $mathbb N$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:08
$begingroup$
just saying length n as in all other terms beyond n are not changed eg. (13245678...) would be of length 3
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo For example, when, in your listing, to you list the permutation that maps $1$ to $2$, $2$ to $1$, $3$ to $4$, $4$ to $3$, $2k-1$ to $2k$ and $2k$ to $2k-1$?. There is no $n$ at which all terms beyond $n$ are unchanged! Every integer gets moved either one up or one down.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:13
$begingroup$
Ok I get it now, thanks
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:20
$begingroup$
Ok that makes sense, but I thought one could list all permutations by having permutations of different 'lengths' n (that permutate only the first n terms, where all permutations of length n are finite) and then listing each one after the other ie all permutations of length 1, all permutations of length 2 etc.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:07
$begingroup$
Ok that makes sense, but I thought one could list all permutations by having permutations of different 'lengths' n (that permutate only the first n terms, where all permutations of length n are finite) and then listing each one after the other ie all permutations of length 1, all permutations of length 2 etc.
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:07
1
1
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo There is no "length" to speak of here. Each permutation is a permutation of "infinite" length, if you will. It is a rearangement of the entire set $mathbb N$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:08
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo There is no "length" to speak of here. Each permutation is a permutation of "infinite" length, if you will. It is a rearangement of the entire set $mathbb N$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:08
$begingroup$
just saying length n as in all other terms beyond n are not changed eg. (13245678...) would be of length 3
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:12
$begingroup$
just saying length n as in all other terms beyond n are not changed eg. (13245678...) would be of length 3
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo For example, when, in your listing, to you list the permutation that maps $1$ to $2$, $2$ to $1$, $3$ to $4$, $4$ to $3$, $2k-1$ to $2k$ and $2k$ to $2k-1$?. There is no $n$ at which all terms beyond $n$ are unchanged! Every integer gets moved either one up or one down.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:13
$begingroup$
@Lorenzo For example, when, in your listing, to you list the permutation that maps $1$ to $2$, $2$ to $1$, $3$ to $4$, $4$ to $3$, $2k-1$ to $2k$ and $2k$ to $2k-1$?. There is no $n$ at which all terms beyond $n$ are unchanged! Every integer gets moved either one up or one down.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Apr 8 at 11:13
$begingroup$
Ok I get it now, thanks
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:20
$begingroup$
Ok I get it now, thanks
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Apr 8 at 11:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
While the motivation for this question is the rearrangement theorem, the title should reflect the actual question instead.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Apr 8 at 12:38