Multiple OR (||) Conditions in If StatementBug in List.contains for Id data type?Multiple conditions on rendered attributeMultiple conditions in visualforcehow to bulkify soql with multiple where conditionsMultiple OR conditions not working IF statementLimiting Number of Accounts for UserRun a Trigger only during weekdaysPublic Write Access allows for mass edits, how to throttle editable batch size for certain users for specific field?Methods to Check if Sobjects are EqualWhy does the trigger always read my if statement as null?SOQL Search function of Contact Name With Account Parent to Contact Child

"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context

Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleum

Why is the underscore command _ useful?

std::unique_ptr of base class holding reference of derived class does not show warning in gcc compiler while naked pointer shows it. Why?

Find the identical rows in a matrix

Nails holding drywall

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

Multiple options vs single option UI

Apply a different color ramp to subset of categorized symbols in QGIS?

Will I lose my paid in full property

Is it acceptable to use working hours to read general interest books?

Multiple fireplaces in an apartment building?

How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?

How to pronounce 'c++' in Spanish

What does a straight horizontal line above a few notes, after a changed tempo mean?

Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?

How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?

Is there a word for the censored part of a video?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Drawing a german abacus as in the books of Adam Ries

Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?

What is purpose of DB Browser(dbbrowser.aspx) under admin tool?



Multiple OR (||) Conditions in If Statement


Bug in List.contains for Id data type?Multiple conditions on rendered attributeMultiple conditions in visualforcehow to bulkify soql with multiple where conditionsMultiple OR conditions not working IF statementLimiting Number of Accounts for UserRun a Trigger only during weekdaysPublic Write Access allows for mass edits, how to throttle editable batch size for certain users for specific field?Methods to Check if Sobjects are EqualWhy does the trigger always read my if statement as null?SOQL Search function of Contact Name With Account Parent to Contact Child






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















Can anyone explain why the following If statement does not work with multiple OR conditions. The goal is when this trigger runs, if the user's Id who is updating the record is not equal to a specific Id, then an error is thrown. The If clause works only when I compare the current user's Id with a single specific Id.



 String currentUserId = UserInfo.getUserId();

if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ')
Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');



EDIT FYI: I know I can accomplish this by using the following code, but I am curious as to why the OR operator is not working as I had expected.



 if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX') 
if (currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY')
if (currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ')
Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');












share|improve this question






























    1















    Can anyone explain why the following If statement does not work with multiple OR conditions. The goal is when this trigger runs, if the user's Id who is updating the record is not equal to a specific Id, then an error is thrown. The If clause works only when I compare the current user's Id with a single specific Id.



     String currentUserId = UserInfo.getUserId();

    if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ')
    Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');



    EDIT FYI: I know I can accomplish this by using the following code, but I am curious as to why the OR operator is not working as I had expected.



     if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX') 
    if (currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY')
    if (currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ')
    Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');












    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1








      Can anyone explain why the following If statement does not work with multiple OR conditions. The goal is when this trigger runs, if the user's Id who is updating the record is not equal to a specific Id, then an error is thrown. The If clause works only when I compare the current user's Id with a single specific Id.



       String currentUserId = UserInfo.getUserId();

      if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ')
      Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');



      EDIT FYI: I know I can accomplish this by using the following code, but I am curious as to why the OR operator is not working as I had expected.



       if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX') 
      if (currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY')
      if (currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ')
      Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');












      share|improve this question
















      Can anyone explain why the following If statement does not work with multiple OR conditions. The goal is when this trigger runs, if the user's Id who is updating the record is not equal to a specific Id, then an error is thrown. The If clause works only when I compare the current user's Id with a single specific Id.



       String currentUserId = UserInfo.getUserId();

      if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ')
      Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');



      EDIT FYI: I know I can accomplish this by using the following code, but I am curious as to why the OR operator is not working as I had expected.



       if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX') 
      if (currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY')
      if (currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ')
      Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');









      apex trigger if






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 18 at 16:42







      Max Goldfarb

















      asked Apr 18 at 16:38









      Max GoldfarbMax Goldfarb

      134




      134




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          "OR" means "true if either value is true". If the ID is "XXXXXXXXX", for example, it will NOT be "YYYYYYYYY", therefore OR will result in a true value. You need to use "AND" (&&) instead, meaning "true only if both values are true."




          Side note: It's not enough to just put an error on Trigger.new[0]; there may be multiple records in the trigger context, and this can result in a "too many retries" error during bulk data operations.






          share|improve this answer























          • Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

            – Max Goldfarb
            Apr 18 at 16:44











          • Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

            – Sebastian Kessel
            Apr 18 at 16:46











          • That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

            – Sebastian Kessel
            Apr 18 at 16:48






          • 2





            @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

            – sfdcfox
            Apr 18 at 16:52











          • Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

            – Max Goldfarb
            Apr 18 at 16:55


















          1














          @sfdcfox is correct, Although I would do a



          !( (new List<String>'XXXX','YYYY','ZZZZ').contains(currentUserId) )


          Chaining a bunch of Logical OR's gets messy, especially if you need to add to the list in the future. I would make a public static variable of it to describe the classes permission if you plan on using that permission group you have there in more than one place.






          share|improve this answer























          • That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

            – Max Goldfarb
            Apr 18 at 16:59











          • If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

            – Zach Hutchins
            Apr 18 at 17:01











          • I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

            – Zach Hutchins
            Apr 18 at 17:14


















          1














          In programming,



          if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') 


          means that, if at least any of the 3 conditions is TRUE, the full expression is TRUE.



          For a currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', the expression is evaluated as




          currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' ==> FALSE

          currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' ==> TRUE

          currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ' ==> TRUE




          So, for currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', it adds the error Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field, which is not desirable.



          It can be explained by De Morgan's Law.




          Not (A and B) is the same as Not A or Not B.



          Not (A or B) is the same as Not A and Not B.




          In your case,




          currentUserId NOT ('XXXXXXXXX' OR 'YYYYYYYYY' OR 'ZZZZZZZZZ')




          which can be written as




          currentUserId NOT 'XXXXXXXXX' AND currentUserId NOT 'YYYYYYYYY' AND currentUserId NOT 'ZZZZZZZZZ'







          share|improve this answer






























            1














            While your logic will always return true because the value is always not one of the three values, correcting this code by inverting || to && would be missing the point that there is a better way to filter logic so it is specific to a subset of users. The two most ideal ways to code for this so that it is configurable are Custom Permissions and Hierarchy Custom Settings.



            Custom Permissions



            1. Create a Custom Permission named e.g. CanDoOperationX.

            2. Create a Permission Set which contains only this permission.

            3. Assign this Permission Set to each User in your whitelist.

            4. Update your condition to check FeatureManagement.checkPermission('CanDoOperationX')

            Hierarchy Custom Setting



            This option doesn't make as much sense unless you have other user specific overrides for this functionality, but it is certainly viable.



            1. Create a Hierarchy Custom Setting named e.g. MyTriggerSettings.

            2. Add a Checkbox field named e.g. Can_Do_Operation_X__c.

            3. Create a new record in this setting for each User in your whitelist.

            4. Update your condition to check $MyTriggerSettings__c.getInstance().Can_Do_Operation_X__c.





            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "459"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258350%2fmultiple-or-conditions-in-if-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              "OR" means "true if either value is true". If the ID is "XXXXXXXXX", for example, it will NOT be "YYYYYYYYY", therefore OR will result in a true value. You need to use "AND" (&&) instead, meaning "true only if both values are true."




              Side note: It's not enough to just put an error on Trigger.new[0]; there may be multiple records in the trigger context, and this can result in a "too many retries" error during bulk data operations.






              share|improve this answer























              • Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:44











              • Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:46











              • That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:48






              • 2





                @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

                – sfdcfox
                Apr 18 at 16:52











              • Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:55















              2














              "OR" means "true if either value is true". If the ID is "XXXXXXXXX", for example, it will NOT be "YYYYYYYYY", therefore OR will result in a true value. You need to use "AND" (&&) instead, meaning "true only if both values are true."




              Side note: It's not enough to just put an error on Trigger.new[0]; there may be multiple records in the trigger context, and this can result in a "too many retries" error during bulk data operations.






              share|improve this answer























              • Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:44











              • Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:46











              • That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:48






              • 2





                @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

                – sfdcfox
                Apr 18 at 16:52











              • Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:55













              2












              2








              2







              "OR" means "true if either value is true". If the ID is "XXXXXXXXX", for example, it will NOT be "YYYYYYYYY", therefore OR will result in a true value. You need to use "AND" (&&) instead, meaning "true only if both values are true."




              Side note: It's not enough to just put an error on Trigger.new[0]; there may be multiple records in the trigger context, and this can result in a "too many retries" error during bulk data operations.






              share|improve this answer













              "OR" means "true if either value is true". If the ID is "XXXXXXXXX", for example, it will NOT be "YYYYYYYYY", therefore OR will result in a true value. You need to use "AND" (&&) instead, meaning "true only if both values are true."




              Side note: It's not enough to just put an error on Trigger.new[0]; there may be multiple records in the trigger context, and this can result in a "too many retries" error during bulk data operations.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Apr 18 at 16:40









              sfdcfoxsfdcfox

              267k13213461




              267k13213461












              • Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:44











              • Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:46











              • That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:48






              • 2





                @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

                – sfdcfox
                Apr 18 at 16:52











              • Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:55

















              • Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:44











              • Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:46











              • That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:48






              • 2





                @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

                – sfdcfox
                Apr 18 at 16:52











              • Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:55
















              Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:44





              Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:44













              Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

              – Sebastian Kessel
              Apr 18 at 16:46





              Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

              – Sebastian Kessel
              Apr 18 at 16:46













              That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

              – Sebastian Kessel
              Apr 18 at 16:48





              That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

              – Sebastian Kessel
              Apr 18 at 16:48




              2




              2





              @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

              – sfdcfox
              Apr 18 at 16:52





              @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

              – sfdcfox
              Apr 18 at 16:52













              Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:55





              Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:55













              1














              @sfdcfox is correct, Although I would do a



              !( (new List<String>'XXXX','YYYY','ZZZZ').contains(currentUserId) )


              Chaining a bunch of Logical OR's gets messy, especially if you need to add to the list in the future. I would make a public static variable of it to describe the classes permission if you plan on using that permission group you have there in more than one place.






              share|improve this answer























              • That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:59











              • If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:01











              • I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:14















              1














              @sfdcfox is correct, Although I would do a



              !( (new List<String>'XXXX','YYYY','ZZZZ').contains(currentUserId) )


              Chaining a bunch of Logical OR's gets messy, especially if you need to add to the list in the future. I would make a public static variable of it to describe the classes permission if you plan on using that permission group you have there in more than one place.






              share|improve this answer























              • That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:59











              • If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:01











              • I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:14













              1












              1








              1







              @sfdcfox is correct, Although I would do a



              !( (new List<String>'XXXX','YYYY','ZZZZ').contains(currentUserId) )


              Chaining a bunch of Logical OR's gets messy, especially if you need to add to the list in the future. I would make a public static variable of it to describe the classes permission if you plan on using that permission group you have there in more than one place.






              share|improve this answer













              @sfdcfox is correct, Although I would do a



              !( (new List<String>'XXXX','YYYY','ZZZZ').contains(currentUserId) )


              Chaining a bunch of Logical OR's gets messy, especially if you need to add to the list in the future. I would make a public static variable of it to describe the classes permission if you plan on using that permission group you have there in more than one place.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Apr 18 at 16:56









              Zach HutchinsZach Hutchins

              829




              829












              • That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:59











              • If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:01











              • I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:14

















              • That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:59











              • If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:01











              • I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:14
















              That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:59





              That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:59













              If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

              – Zach Hutchins
              Apr 18 at 17:01





              If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

              – Zach Hutchins
              Apr 18 at 17:01













              I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

              – Zach Hutchins
              Apr 18 at 17:14





              I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

              – Zach Hutchins
              Apr 18 at 17:14











              1














              In programming,



              if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') 


              means that, if at least any of the 3 conditions is TRUE, the full expression is TRUE.



              For a currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', the expression is evaluated as




              currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' ==> FALSE

              currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' ==> TRUE

              currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ' ==> TRUE




              So, for currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', it adds the error Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field, which is not desirable.



              It can be explained by De Morgan's Law.




              Not (A and B) is the same as Not A or Not B.



              Not (A or B) is the same as Not A and Not B.




              In your case,




              currentUserId NOT ('XXXXXXXXX' OR 'YYYYYYYYY' OR 'ZZZZZZZZZ')




              which can be written as




              currentUserId NOT 'XXXXXXXXX' AND currentUserId NOT 'YYYYYYYYY' AND currentUserId NOT 'ZZZZZZZZZ'







              share|improve this answer



























                1














                In programming,



                if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') 


                means that, if at least any of the 3 conditions is TRUE, the full expression is TRUE.



                For a currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', the expression is evaluated as




                currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' ==> FALSE

                currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' ==> TRUE

                currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ' ==> TRUE




                So, for currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', it adds the error Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field, which is not desirable.



                It can be explained by De Morgan's Law.




                Not (A and B) is the same as Not A or Not B.



                Not (A or B) is the same as Not A and Not B.




                In your case,




                currentUserId NOT ('XXXXXXXXX' OR 'YYYYYYYYY' OR 'ZZZZZZZZZ')




                which can be written as




                currentUserId NOT 'XXXXXXXXX' AND currentUserId NOT 'YYYYYYYYY' AND currentUserId NOT 'ZZZZZZZZZ'







                share|improve this answer

























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  In programming,



                  if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') 


                  means that, if at least any of the 3 conditions is TRUE, the full expression is TRUE.



                  For a currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', the expression is evaluated as




                  currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' ==> FALSE

                  currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' ==> TRUE

                  currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ' ==> TRUE




                  So, for currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', it adds the error Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field, which is not desirable.



                  It can be explained by De Morgan's Law.




                  Not (A and B) is the same as Not A or Not B.



                  Not (A or B) is the same as Not A and Not B.




                  In your case,




                  currentUserId NOT ('XXXXXXXXX' OR 'YYYYYYYYY' OR 'ZZZZZZZZZ')




                  which can be written as




                  currentUserId NOT 'XXXXXXXXX' AND currentUserId NOT 'YYYYYYYYY' AND currentUserId NOT 'ZZZZZZZZZ'







                  share|improve this answer













                  In programming,



                  if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') 


                  means that, if at least any of the 3 conditions is TRUE, the full expression is TRUE.



                  For a currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', the expression is evaluated as




                  currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' ==> FALSE

                  currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' ==> TRUE

                  currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ' ==> TRUE




                  So, for currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', it adds the error Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field, which is not desirable.



                  It can be explained by De Morgan's Law.




                  Not (A and B) is the same as Not A or Not B.



                  Not (A or B) is the same as Not A and Not B.




                  In your case,




                  currentUserId NOT ('XXXXXXXXX' OR 'YYYYYYYYY' OR 'ZZZZZZZZZ')




                  which can be written as




                  currentUserId NOT 'XXXXXXXXX' AND currentUserId NOT 'YYYYYYYYY' AND currentUserId NOT 'ZZZZZZZZZ'








                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 18 at 17:05









                  Noor A ShuvoNoor A Shuvo

                  1316




                  1316





















                      1














                      While your logic will always return true because the value is always not one of the three values, correcting this code by inverting || to && would be missing the point that there is a better way to filter logic so it is specific to a subset of users. The two most ideal ways to code for this so that it is configurable are Custom Permissions and Hierarchy Custom Settings.



                      Custom Permissions



                      1. Create a Custom Permission named e.g. CanDoOperationX.

                      2. Create a Permission Set which contains only this permission.

                      3. Assign this Permission Set to each User in your whitelist.

                      4. Update your condition to check FeatureManagement.checkPermission('CanDoOperationX')

                      Hierarchy Custom Setting



                      This option doesn't make as much sense unless you have other user specific overrides for this functionality, but it is certainly viable.



                      1. Create a Hierarchy Custom Setting named e.g. MyTriggerSettings.

                      2. Add a Checkbox field named e.g. Can_Do_Operation_X__c.

                      3. Create a new record in this setting for each User in your whitelist.

                      4. Update your condition to check $MyTriggerSettings__c.getInstance().Can_Do_Operation_X__c.





                      share|improve this answer



























                        1














                        While your logic will always return true because the value is always not one of the three values, correcting this code by inverting || to && would be missing the point that there is a better way to filter logic so it is specific to a subset of users. The two most ideal ways to code for this so that it is configurable are Custom Permissions and Hierarchy Custom Settings.



                        Custom Permissions



                        1. Create a Custom Permission named e.g. CanDoOperationX.

                        2. Create a Permission Set which contains only this permission.

                        3. Assign this Permission Set to each User in your whitelist.

                        4. Update your condition to check FeatureManagement.checkPermission('CanDoOperationX')

                        Hierarchy Custom Setting



                        This option doesn't make as much sense unless you have other user specific overrides for this functionality, but it is certainly viable.



                        1. Create a Hierarchy Custom Setting named e.g. MyTriggerSettings.

                        2. Add a Checkbox field named e.g. Can_Do_Operation_X__c.

                        3. Create a new record in this setting for each User in your whitelist.

                        4. Update your condition to check $MyTriggerSettings__c.getInstance().Can_Do_Operation_X__c.





                        share|improve this answer

























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          While your logic will always return true because the value is always not one of the three values, correcting this code by inverting || to && would be missing the point that there is a better way to filter logic so it is specific to a subset of users. The two most ideal ways to code for this so that it is configurable are Custom Permissions and Hierarchy Custom Settings.



                          Custom Permissions



                          1. Create a Custom Permission named e.g. CanDoOperationX.

                          2. Create a Permission Set which contains only this permission.

                          3. Assign this Permission Set to each User in your whitelist.

                          4. Update your condition to check FeatureManagement.checkPermission('CanDoOperationX')

                          Hierarchy Custom Setting



                          This option doesn't make as much sense unless you have other user specific overrides for this functionality, but it is certainly viable.



                          1. Create a Hierarchy Custom Setting named e.g. MyTriggerSettings.

                          2. Add a Checkbox field named e.g. Can_Do_Operation_X__c.

                          3. Create a new record in this setting for each User in your whitelist.

                          4. Update your condition to check $MyTriggerSettings__c.getInstance().Can_Do_Operation_X__c.





                          share|improve this answer













                          While your logic will always return true because the value is always not one of the three values, correcting this code by inverting || to && would be missing the point that there is a better way to filter logic so it is specific to a subset of users. The two most ideal ways to code for this so that it is configurable are Custom Permissions and Hierarchy Custom Settings.



                          Custom Permissions



                          1. Create a Custom Permission named e.g. CanDoOperationX.

                          2. Create a Permission Set which contains only this permission.

                          3. Assign this Permission Set to each User in your whitelist.

                          4. Update your condition to check FeatureManagement.checkPermission('CanDoOperationX')

                          Hierarchy Custom Setting



                          This option doesn't make as much sense unless you have other user specific overrides for this functionality, but it is certainly viable.



                          1. Create a Hierarchy Custom Setting named e.g. MyTriggerSettings.

                          2. Add a Checkbox field named e.g. Can_Do_Operation_X__c.

                          3. Create a new record in this setting for each User in your whitelist.

                          4. Update your condition to check $MyTriggerSettings__c.getInstance().Can_Do_Operation_X__c.






                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Apr 18 at 17:13









                          Adrian LarsonAdrian Larson

                          111k19122259




                          111k19122259



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258350%2fmultiple-or-conditions-in-if-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                              Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                              Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020