When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraOn the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?Does Fey Ancestry grant advantage on the save against Otto's Irresistible Dance?What happens with lethargy when Haste is cast again on a creature before first cast runs out?Can I use haste on an enemy to make them waste two turns?Will an Antimagic Field on a target of a “Haste” spell trigger the wave of lethargy?Can you magically fly while Paralyzed?Does paralysis prevent actions that don’t require movement?Is a slowed creature denied the action to break free from Hold Person spell?Can you use a readied action after Haste?Can Bigby's Hand attempt Strength and Dexterity saving throws?
What is the least dense liquid under normal conditions?
What is /etc/mtab in Linux?
Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?
Trumpet valves, lengths, and pitch
Is Electric Central Heating worth it if using Solar Panels?
Is accepting an invalid credit card number a security issue?
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
Does Feeblemind produce an ongoing magical effect that can be dispelled?
Why is an operator the quantum mechanical analogue of an observable?
Error: Syntax error. Missing ')' for CASE Statement
What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?
"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?
Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department
Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?
How to count in linear time worst-case?
Expansion//Explosion and Siren Stormtamer
Is this homebrew racial feat, Stonehide, balanced?
How would I use different systems of magic when they are capable of the same effects?
Would reducing the reference voltage of an ADC have any effect on accuracy?
Where did Arya get these scars?
How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?
Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?
Visa-free travel to the US using refugee travel document from Spain?
Is there any hidden 'W' sound after 'comment' in : Comment est-elle?
When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature?
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraOn the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?Does Fey Ancestry grant advantage on the save against Otto's Irresistible Dance?What happens with lethargy when Haste is cast again on a creature before first cast runs out?Can I use haste on an enemy to make them waste two turns?Will an Antimagic Field on a target of a “Haste” spell trigger the wave of lethargy?Can you magically fly while Paralyzed?Does paralysis prevent actions that don’t require movement?Is a slowed creature denied the action to break free from Hold Person spell?Can you use a readied action after Haste?Can Bigby's Hand attempt Strength and Dexterity saving throws?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The rules for the haste spell state the following:
When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.
--- Player's Handbook p. 250
Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?
dnd-5e spells advantage-and-disadvantage
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The rules for the haste spell state the following:
When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.
--- Player's Handbook p. 250
Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?
dnd-5e spells advantage-and-disadvantage
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
Apr 17 at 20:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The rules for the haste spell state the following:
When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.
--- Player's Handbook p. 250
Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?
dnd-5e spells advantage-and-disadvantage
$endgroup$
The rules for the haste spell state the following:
When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.
--- Player's Handbook p. 250
Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?
dnd-5e spells advantage-and-disadvantage
dnd-5e spells advantage-and-disadvantage
edited Apr 17 at 23:31
V2Blast
27.8k598169
27.8k598169
asked Apr 17 at 18:04
GeorgeGeorge
1148
1148
2
$begingroup$
If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
Apr 17 at 20:29
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
Apr 17 at 20:29
2
2
$begingroup$
If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
Apr 17 at 20:29
$begingroup$
If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
Apr 17 at 20:29
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction*).
The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...
*(As was noted in the comments and in the related question On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction? , reaction should probably not be included.
However, my interpretation goes along the "reaction is a special kind of action" PHB quote)
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
Apr 17 at 19:50
$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 17 at 21:57
3
$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 17 at 23:32
$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 18 at 5:21
$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
Apr 18 at 5:42
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145379%2fwhen-the-haste-spell-ends-on-a-creature-do-attackers-have-advantage-against-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction*).
The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...
*(As was noted in the comments and in the related question On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction? , reaction should probably not be included.
However, my interpretation goes along the "reaction is a special kind of action" PHB quote)
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
Apr 17 at 19:50
$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 17 at 21:57
3
$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 17 at 23:32
$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 18 at 5:21
$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
Apr 18 at 5:42
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction*).
The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...
*(As was noted in the comments and in the related question On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction? , reaction should probably not be included.
However, my interpretation goes along the "reaction is a special kind of action" PHB quote)
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
Apr 17 at 19:50
$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 17 at 21:57
3
$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 17 at 23:32
$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 18 at 5:21
$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
Apr 18 at 5:42
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction*).
The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...
*(As was noted in the comments and in the related question On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction? , reaction should probably not be included.
However, my interpretation goes along the "reaction is a special kind of action" PHB quote)
$endgroup$
It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction*).
The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...
*(As was noted in the comments and in the related question On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction? , reaction should probably not be included.
However, my interpretation goes along the "reaction is a special kind of action" PHB quote)
edited Apr 18 at 7:30
answered Apr 17 at 18:09
adoniesadonies
8272715
8272715
3
$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
Apr 17 at 19:50
$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 17 at 21:57
3
$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 17 at 23:32
$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 18 at 5:21
$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
Apr 18 at 5:42
|
show 1 more comment
3
$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
Apr 17 at 19:50
$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 17 at 21:57
3
$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 17 at 23:32
$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 18 at 5:21
$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
Apr 18 at 5:42
3
3
$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
Apr 17 at 19:50
$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
Apr 17 at 19:50
$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 17 at 21:57
$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 17 at 21:57
3
3
$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 17 at 23:32
$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 17 at 23:32
$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 18 at 5:21
$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 18 at 5:21
$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
Apr 18 at 5:42
$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
Apr 18 at 5:42
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145379%2fwhen-the-haste-spell-ends-on-a-creature-do-attackers-have-advantage-against-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
Apr 17 at 20:29