When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraOn the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?Does Fey Ancestry grant advantage on the save against Otto's Irresistible Dance?What happens with lethargy when Haste is cast again on a creature before first cast runs out?Can I use haste on an enemy to make them waste two turns?Will an Antimagic Field on a target of a “Haste” spell trigger the wave of lethargy?Can you magically fly while Paralyzed?Does paralysis prevent actions that don’t require movement?Is a slowed creature denied the action to break free from Hold Person spell?Can you use a readied action after Haste?Can Bigby's Hand attempt Strength and Dexterity saving throws?

What is the least dense liquid under normal conditions?

What is /etc/mtab in Linux?

Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?

Trumpet valves, lengths, and pitch

Is Electric Central Heating worth it if using Solar Panels?

Is accepting an invalid credit card number a security issue?

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

Does Feeblemind produce an ongoing magical effect that can be dispelled?

Why is an operator the quantum mechanical analogue of an observable?

Error: Syntax error. Missing ')' for CASE Statement

What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department

Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?

How to count in linear time worst-case?

Expansion//Explosion and Siren Stormtamer

Is this homebrew racial feat, Stonehide, balanced?

How would I use different systems of magic when they are capable of the same effects?

Would reducing the reference voltage of an ADC have any effect on accuracy?

Where did Arya get these scars?

How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

Visa-free travel to the US using refugee travel document from Spain?

Is there any hidden 'W' sound after 'comment' in : Comment est-elle?



When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraOn the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction?Does Fey Ancestry grant advantage on the save against Otto's Irresistible Dance?What happens with lethargy when Haste is cast again on a creature before first cast runs out?Can I use haste on an enemy to make them waste two turns?Will an Antimagic Field on a target of a “Haste” spell trigger the wave of lethargy?Can you magically fly while Paralyzed?Does paralysis prevent actions that don’t require movement?Is a slowed creature denied the action to break free from Hold Person spell?Can you use a readied action after Haste?Can Bigby's Hand attempt Strength and Dexterity saving throws?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11












$begingroup$


The rules for the haste spell state the following:




When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.



--- Player's Handbook p. 250




Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    Apr 17 at 20:29

















11












$begingroup$


The rules for the haste spell state the following:




When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.



--- Player's Handbook p. 250




Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    Apr 17 at 20:29













11












11








11





$begingroup$


The rules for the haste spell state the following:




When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.



--- Player's Handbook p. 250




Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The rules for the haste spell state the following:




When the spell ends, the target can’t move or take actions until after its next turn, as a wave of lethargy sweeps over it.



--- Player's Handbook p. 250




Does this give attackers an advantage against you as you cannot move? What about making Strength/Dexterity saves during this period? I find it unclear as to what it means by 'can’t move or take actions'?







dnd-5e spells advantage-and-disadvantage






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 17 at 23:31









V2Blast

27.8k598169




27.8k598169










asked Apr 17 at 18:04









GeorgeGeorge

1148




1148







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    Apr 17 at 20:29












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    Apr 17 at 20:29







2




2




$begingroup$
If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
Apr 17 at 20:29




$begingroup$
If it meant the "Stunned" condition, it would say so. The only ambiguity in my eyes is whether "actions" includes Bonus Actions. I think so.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
Apr 17 at 20:29










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















25












$begingroup$

It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction*).



The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...



*(As was noted in the comments and in the related question On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction? , reaction should probably not be included.
However, my interpretation goes along the "reaction is a special kind of action" PHB quote)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Watts
    Apr 17 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    @RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    Apr 17 at 21:57







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Apr 17 at 23:32










  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    Apr 18 at 5:21










  • $begingroup$
    I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
    $endgroup$
    – adonies
    Apr 18 at 5:42












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145379%2fwhen-the-haste-spell-ends-on-a-creature-do-attackers-have-advantage-against-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









25












$begingroup$

It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction*).



The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...



*(As was noted in the comments and in the related question On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction? , reaction should probably not be included.
However, my interpretation goes along the "reaction is a special kind of action" PHB quote)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Watts
    Apr 17 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    @RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    Apr 17 at 21:57







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Apr 17 at 23:32










  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    Apr 18 at 5:21










  • $begingroup$
    I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
    $endgroup$
    – adonies
    Apr 18 at 5:42
















25












$begingroup$

It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction*).



The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...



*(As was noted in the comments and in the related question On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction? , reaction should probably not be included.
However, my interpretation goes along the "reaction is a special kind of action" PHB quote)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Watts
    Apr 17 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    @RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    Apr 17 at 21:57







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Apr 17 at 23:32










  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    Apr 18 at 5:21










  • $begingroup$
    I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
    $endgroup$
    – adonies
    Apr 18 at 5:42














25












25








25





$begingroup$

It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction*).



The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...



*(As was noted in the comments and in the related question On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction? , reaction should probably not be included.
However, my interpretation goes along the "reaction is a special kind of action" PHB quote)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



It means exactly what it says: No movement (speed becomes 0), and no actions (action, bonus action or reaction*).



The rest of the mechanics apply normally: no disadvantage, saves as needed. It doesn't say that any specific condition applies, so nothing else matters...



*(As was noted in the comments and in the related question On the turn after Haste ends, can you use a reaction? , reaction should probably not be included.
However, my interpretation goes along the "reaction is a special kind of action" PHB quote)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 18 at 7:30

























answered Apr 17 at 18:09









adoniesadonies

8272715




8272715







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Watts
    Apr 17 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    @RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    Apr 17 at 21:57







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Apr 17 at 23:32










  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    Apr 18 at 5:21










  • $begingroup$
    I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
    $endgroup$
    – adonies
    Apr 18 at 5:42













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Watts
    Apr 17 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    @RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    Apr 17 at 21:57







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Apr 17 at 23:32










  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Vadruk
    Apr 18 at 5:21










  • $begingroup$
    I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
    $endgroup$
    – adonies
    Apr 18 at 5:42








3




3




$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
Apr 17 at 19:50




$begingroup$
According to rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/59079/… you can still use reactions.
$endgroup$
– Rob Watts
Apr 17 at 19:50












$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 17 at 21:57





$begingroup$
@RobWatts According to that link it seems that reactions are "a special kind of action".
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 17 at 21:57





3




3




$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 17 at 23:32




$begingroup$
@Vadruk: That is according to the answer with fewer upvotes. While reactions may be a "special kind of action", there's no rule that says things that prevent actions also prevent reactions (and, in fact, everything that prevents reactions specifically says so, separately from actions). They are "special", after all.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 17 at 23:32












$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 18 at 5:21




$begingroup$
@V2Blast After reading both answers a couple more time, I have to agree with you.
$endgroup$
– Vadruk
Apr 18 at 5:21












$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
Apr 18 at 5:42





$begingroup$
I feel that Crawford's tweet is (intentionally?) vague, probably stating his preference for ruling over the Haste spell, but it was two years ago and it hasn't made it into the Sage Advice (updated 2019), so his ruling may not be what the developers intended - as stated in PHB (special kind of action).
$endgroup$
– adonies
Apr 18 at 5:42


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145379%2fwhen-the-haste-spell-ends-on-a-creature-do-attackers-have-advantage-against-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company