Why does the resolve message appear first? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Why is using “for…in” with array iteration a bad idea?How does JavaScript .prototype work?How do I make the first letter of a string uppercase in JavaScript?What does “use strict” do in JavaScript, and what is the reasoning behind it?What is JSONP, and why was it created?Why does Google prepend while(1); to their JSON responses?Why does ++[[]][+[]]+[+[]] return the string “10”?How does data binding work in AngularJS?How does Facebook disable the browser's integrated Developer Tools?ECMAScript 6 Chaining Promises

What do you call the part of a novel that is not dialog?

Split coins into combinations of different denominations

Are all CP/M-80 implementations binary compatible?

What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?

Is it OK if I do not take the receipt in Germany?

How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?

std::is_constructible on incomplete types

What's parked in Mil Moscow helicopter plant?

c++ diamond problem - How to call base method only once

A Paper Record is What I Hamper

Additive group of local rings

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

How to not starve gigantic beasts

How to avoid introduction cliches

Is it acceptable to use working hours to read general interest books?

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

What is /etc/mtab in Linux?

Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring

Are there moral objections to a life motivated purely by money? How to sway a person from this lifestyle?

finding a tangent line to a parabola

Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?

What is a 'Key' in computer science?

"Rubric" as meaning "signature" or "personal mark" -- is this accepted usage?

Is a 5 watt UHF/VHF handheld considered QRP?



Why does the resolve message appear first?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Why is using “for…in” with array iteration a bad idea?How does JavaScript .prototype work?How do I make the first letter of a string uppercase in JavaScript?What does “use strict” do in JavaScript, and what is the reasoning behind it?What is JSONP, and why was it created?Why does Google prepend while(1); to their JSON responses?Why does ++[[]][+[]]+[+[]] return the string “10”?How does data binding work in AngularJS?How does Facebook disable the browser's integrated Developer Tools?ECMAScript 6 Chaining Promises



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








11















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"









share|improve this question



















  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    Apr 17 at 18:44






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    Apr 17 at 18:54






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    Apr 17 at 18:58






  • 5





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    Apr 17 at 19:07






  • 1





    I'd add that 1% to that.

    – Michał Kapracki
    Apr 17 at 19:38

















11















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"









share|improve this question



















  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    Apr 17 at 18:44






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    Apr 17 at 18:54






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    Apr 17 at 18:58






  • 5





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    Apr 17 at 19:07






  • 1





    I'd add that 1% to that.

    – Michał Kapracki
    Apr 17 at 19:38













11












11








11


3






I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"









share|improve this question
















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"






javascript es6-promise






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 18 at 1:27









Boann

37.6k1291123




37.6k1291123










asked Apr 17 at 18:39









EdwinEdwin

685




685







  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    Apr 17 at 18:44






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    Apr 17 at 18:54






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    Apr 17 at 18:58






  • 5





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    Apr 17 at 19:07






  • 1





    I'd add that 1% to that.

    – Michał Kapracki
    Apr 17 at 19:38












  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    Apr 17 at 18:44






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    Apr 17 at 18:54






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    Apr 17 at 18:58






  • 5





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    Apr 17 at 19:07






  • 1





    I'd add that 1% to that.

    – Michał Kapracki
    Apr 17 at 19:38







3




3





You are creating new promise on every iteration

– brk
Apr 17 at 18:44





You are creating new promise on every iteration

– brk
Apr 17 at 18:44




5




5





Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

– junvar
Apr 17 at 18:54





Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

– junvar
Apr 17 at 18:54




2




2





Yes Junvar. That is my question.

– Edwin
Apr 17 at 18:58





Yes Junvar. That is my question.

– Edwin
Apr 17 at 18:58




5




5





99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

– jhpratt
Apr 17 at 19:07





99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

– jhpratt
Apr 17 at 19:07




1




1





I'd add that 1% to that.

– Michał Kapracki
Apr 17 at 19:38





I'd add that 1% to that.

– Michał Kapracki
Apr 17 at 19:38












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 17 at 19:55


















2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    Apr 17 at 19:45






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    Apr 17 at 19:49


















0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 17 at 19:57











  • Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

    – Edwin
    Apr 18 at 5:20











  • you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 18 at 5:37


















0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



promise.catch() is calling promise.then(undefined, onreject). That is why resolve allways appeared first.






share|improve this answer

























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    Apr 17 at 20:06











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55734046%2fwhy-does-the-resolve-message-appear-first%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 17 at 19:55















4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 17 at 19:55













4












4








4







You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer













You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 17 at 19:33









ludovicoludovico

1659




1659












  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 17 at 19:55

















  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 17 at 19:55
















i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

– Yanis-git
Apr 17 at 19:55





i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

– Yanis-git
Apr 17 at 19:55













2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    Apr 17 at 19:45






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    Apr 17 at 19:49















2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    Apr 17 at 19:45






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    Apr 17 at 19:49













2












2








2







The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer













The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 17 at 19:33









Esdras XavierEsdras Xavier

45017




45017







  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    Apr 17 at 19:45






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    Apr 17 at 19:49












  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    Apr 17 at 19:45






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    Apr 17 at 19:49







1




1





well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

– pushkin
Apr 17 at 19:45





well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

– pushkin
Apr 17 at 19:45




1




1





Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

– Edwin
Apr 17 at 19:49





Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

– Edwin
Apr 17 at 19:49











0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 17 at 19:57











  • Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

    – Edwin
    Apr 18 at 5:20











  • you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 18 at 5:37















0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 17 at 19:57











  • Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

    – Edwin
    Apr 18 at 5:20











  • you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 18 at 5:37













0












0








0







Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer













Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 17 at 19:47









Yanis-gitYanis-git

2,6571725




2,6571725












  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 17 at 19:57











  • Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

    – Edwin
    Apr 18 at 5:20











  • you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 18 at 5:37

















  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 17 at 19:57











  • Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

    – Edwin
    Apr 18 at 5:20











  • you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

    – Yanis-git
    Apr 18 at 5:37
















@Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

– Yanis-git
Apr 17 at 19:57





@Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

– Yanis-git
Apr 17 at 19:57













Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

– Edwin
Apr 18 at 5:20





Fair question. Yes you gave a good explanation of how the event loop works and how promise fits in there. Ludvico posted a solution that produced the expected result.That still did not explain to me enough why it was happening. The key to understanding this was at MDN saying: The catch() is calling Promise.prototype.then(undefined, onrejected). Then I looked at the description of then Promise.prototype.then(). Under the syntax header I found this.

– Edwin
Apr 18 at 5:20













you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

– Yanis-git
Apr 18 at 5:37





you can see much mind blown with following case : all case posted here :o

– Yanis-git
Apr 18 at 5:37











0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



promise.catch() is calling promise.then(undefined, onreject). That is why resolve allways appeared first.






share|improve this answer

























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    Apr 17 at 20:06















0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



promise.catch() is calling promise.then(undefined, onreject). That is why resolve allways appeared first.






share|improve this answer

























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    Apr 17 at 20:06













0












0








0







I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



promise.catch() is calling promise.then(undefined, onreject). That is why resolve allways appeared first.






share|improve this answer















I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



promise.catch() is calling promise.then(undefined, onreject). That is why resolve allways appeared first.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 18 at 6:07

























answered Apr 17 at 20:03









EdwinEdwin

685




685












  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    Apr 17 at 20:06

















  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    Apr 17 at 20:06
















I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

– jhpratt
Apr 17 at 20:06





I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

– jhpratt
Apr 17 at 20:06

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55734046%2fwhy-does-the-resolve-message-appear-first%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company