How is Per Object Storage Usage CalculatedNotification Mail based on Storage Usage in salesforceSalesforce Storage requirementsGetting confused with per-organization allocationData storage limit exceeded?Reasons?and solutions?Developer Edition org now have 256MB data storage?Clarification on Data Storage Model in Sales CloudHow to increase data storage in salesforce developer edition?Truncate object causing storage usage errorHow to get “Storage Usage” organization information of a salesforce to another salesforce org?Automated exports of Current Data Storage Usage data

Why are solar panels kept tilted?

Unexpected Netflix account registered to my Gmail address - any way it could be a hack attempt?

Were any toxic metals used in the International Space Station?

"The van's really booking"

Should generated documentation be stored in a Git repository?

Do we have C++20 ranges library in GCC 9?

How to describe a building set which is like LEGO without using the "LEGO" word?

Extract the characters before last colon

Substring join or additional table, which is faster?

Is this a group? If so, what group is it?

Can a tourist shoot a gun for recreational purpose in the USA?

Given 0s on Assignments with suspected and dismissed cheating?

Holding rent money for my friend which amounts to over $10k?

A case where Bishop for knight isn't a good trade

Why are BJTs common in output stages of power amplifiers?

How to make a not so good looking person more appealing?

Is there an academic word that means "to split hairs over"?

Uh oh, the propeller fell off

Should I communicate in my applications that I'm unemployed out of choice rather than because nobody will have me?

Is there any good reason to write "it is easy to see"?

Help understanding this line - usage of くれる

Is it wrong to omit object pronouns in these sentences?

Can I say: "When was your train leaving?" if the train leaves in the future?

Problem in downloading videos using youtube-dl from unsupported sites



How is Per Object Storage Usage Calculated


Notification Mail based on Storage Usage in salesforceSalesforce Storage requirementsGetting confused with per-organization allocationData storage limit exceeded?Reasons?and solutions?Developer Edition org now have 256MB data storage?Clarification on Data Storage Model in Sales CloudHow to increase data storage in salesforce developer edition?Truncate object causing storage usage errorHow to get “Storage Usage” organization information of a salesforce to another salesforce org?Automated exports of Current Data Storage Usage data






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















In attempting to determine the impact of using Text or LongTextArea types in an object, I was surprised by the values displayed in the Setup > Storage Usage page: the sizes for each object type were equal.



To test each type I created 3 Objects :



  1. ShortText : an object that contains a single custom field of type Text (255)

  2. LongTextAreaObject : an object that contains a single field of type LongTextArea(131072)

  3. LongTextAreaObjectEmpty : an object that is exactly the same as LongTextAreaObject that I am using as a control object where I will only populate the name and nothing else

Using DataLoader the following values were loaded (9999 records for each object type):



  1. ShortText had a Name field set to 'a' and the custom Text field set to a concatenated value of 255 'a' chars

  2. LongTextAreaObject had a Name field set to 'a' and the custom LongTextArea field set to a concatenated value of 65470 'a' chars

  3. LongTextAreaObjectEmpty had a Name field set to 'a' and no values in the custom LongTextArea field

For all 3 objects the Setup > Storage Usage page showed a figure of 19.5MB. enter image description here



I would have expected that the ShortText object containing the Text type field would have been smaller due to the amount of data being stored.



Is there an explanation of how the 19.5MB figure is reached? Are Text and LongTextArea some how stored in the same data type under the covers e.g. a CLOB (which would be an odd decision for a 255 length text field)?










share|improve this question




























    4















    In attempting to determine the impact of using Text or LongTextArea types in an object, I was surprised by the values displayed in the Setup > Storage Usage page: the sizes for each object type were equal.



    To test each type I created 3 Objects :



    1. ShortText : an object that contains a single custom field of type Text (255)

    2. LongTextAreaObject : an object that contains a single field of type LongTextArea(131072)

    3. LongTextAreaObjectEmpty : an object that is exactly the same as LongTextAreaObject that I am using as a control object where I will only populate the name and nothing else

    Using DataLoader the following values were loaded (9999 records for each object type):



    1. ShortText had a Name field set to 'a' and the custom Text field set to a concatenated value of 255 'a' chars

    2. LongTextAreaObject had a Name field set to 'a' and the custom LongTextArea field set to a concatenated value of 65470 'a' chars

    3. LongTextAreaObjectEmpty had a Name field set to 'a' and no values in the custom LongTextArea field

    For all 3 objects the Setup > Storage Usage page showed a figure of 19.5MB. enter image description here



    I would have expected that the ShortText object containing the Text type field would have been smaller due to the amount of data being stored.



    Is there an explanation of how the 19.5MB figure is reached? Are Text and LongTextArea some how stored in the same data type under the covers e.g. a CLOB (which would be an odd decision for a 255 length text field)?










    share|improve this question
























      4












      4








      4








      In attempting to determine the impact of using Text or LongTextArea types in an object, I was surprised by the values displayed in the Setup > Storage Usage page: the sizes for each object type were equal.



      To test each type I created 3 Objects :



      1. ShortText : an object that contains a single custom field of type Text (255)

      2. LongTextAreaObject : an object that contains a single field of type LongTextArea(131072)

      3. LongTextAreaObjectEmpty : an object that is exactly the same as LongTextAreaObject that I am using as a control object where I will only populate the name and nothing else

      Using DataLoader the following values were loaded (9999 records for each object type):



      1. ShortText had a Name field set to 'a' and the custom Text field set to a concatenated value of 255 'a' chars

      2. LongTextAreaObject had a Name field set to 'a' and the custom LongTextArea field set to a concatenated value of 65470 'a' chars

      3. LongTextAreaObjectEmpty had a Name field set to 'a' and no values in the custom LongTextArea field

      For all 3 objects the Setup > Storage Usage page showed a figure of 19.5MB. enter image description here



      I would have expected that the ShortText object containing the Text type field would have been smaller due to the amount of data being stored.



      Is there an explanation of how the 19.5MB figure is reached? Are Text and LongTextArea some how stored in the same data type under the covers e.g. a CLOB (which would be an odd decision for a 255 length text field)?










      share|improve this question














      In attempting to determine the impact of using Text or LongTextArea types in an object, I was surprised by the values displayed in the Setup > Storage Usage page: the sizes for each object type were equal.



      To test each type I created 3 Objects :



      1. ShortText : an object that contains a single custom field of type Text (255)

      2. LongTextAreaObject : an object that contains a single field of type LongTextArea(131072)

      3. LongTextAreaObjectEmpty : an object that is exactly the same as LongTextAreaObject that I am using as a control object where I will only populate the name and nothing else

      Using DataLoader the following values were loaded (9999 records for each object type):



      1. ShortText had a Name field set to 'a' and the custom Text field set to a concatenated value of 255 'a' chars

      2. LongTextAreaObject had a Name field set to 'a' and the custom LongTextArea field set to a concatenated value of 65470 'a' chars

      3. LongTextAreaObjectEmpty had a Name field set to 'a' and no values in the custom LongTextArea field

      For all 3 objects the Setup > Storage Usage page showed a figure of 19.5MB. enter image description here



      I would have expected that the ShortText object containing the Text type field would have been smaller due to the amount of data being stored.



      Is there an explanation of how the 19.5MB figure is reached? Are Text and LongTextArea some how stored in the same data type under the covers e.g. a CLOB (which would be an odd decision for a 255 length text field)?







      data-storage






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked May 3 at 12:43









      Fraser WaterfieldFraser Waterfield

      233




      233




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Data Storage is not calculated by the number of fields or content in the fields. It calculated as a number of records. Custom Object take 2KB per record. Doesn't matter i if they have 1 field or 200 long text fields populated.



          Salesforce uses a simplistic method for calculating storage usage. Most standard and Custom objects are 2KB but some special objects like PersonAccount take 4KB(as its an account and contact)



          So in your case. 9999 records take



           (9999*2)/1024 = 19.52MB


          SRC: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=000193871&type=1






          share|improve this answer























          • There are also a few that only take 1k - CampaignMember comes to mind - but since you have have a lot of those, that can be helpful if you can use them in place of more 'expensive' objects

            – BritishBoyinDC
            May 4 at 18:44


















          4














          What you are seeing in Data Storage is not based on the size of the field for respective object. The storage reflects the size of overall record that is stored in that object. Salesforce record size overview
          mentions that any record is roughly around 2KB in size (with some exceptions).



          In your case the storage is approximately around 19.5MB based on 9999 records for each object.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "459"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f261017%2fhow-is-per-object-storage-usage-calculated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            Data Storage is not calculated by the number of fields or content in the fields. It calculated as a number of records. Custom Object take 2KB per record. Doesn't matter i if they have 1 field or 200 long text fields populated.



            Salesforce uses a simplistic method for calculating storage usage. Most standard and Custom objects are 2KB but some special objects like PersonAccount take 4KB(as its an account and contact)



            So in your case. 9999 records take



             (9999*2)/1024 = 19.52MB


            SRC: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=000193871&type=1






            share|improve this answer























            • There are also a few that only take 1k - CampaignMember comes to mind - but since you have have a lot of those, that can be helpful if you can use them in place of more 'expensive' objects

              – BritishBoyinDC
              May 4 at 18:44















            5














            Data Storage is not calculated by the number of fields or content in the fields. It calculated as a number of records. Custom Object take 2KB per record. Doesn't matter i if they have 1 field or 200 long text fields populated.



            Salesforce uses a simplistic method for calculating storage usage. Most standard and Custom objects are 2KB but some special objects like PersonAccount take 4KB(as its an account and contact)



            So in your case. 9999 records take



             (9999*2)/1024 = 19.52MB


            SRC: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=000193871&type=1






            share|improve this answer























            • There are also a few that only take 1k - CampaignMember comes to mind - but since you have have a lot of those, that can be helpful if you can use them in place of more 'expensive' objects

              – BritishBoyinDC
              May 4 at 18:44













            5












            5








            5







            Data Storage is not calculated by the number of fields or content in the fields. It calculated as a number of records. Custom Object take 2KB per record. Doesn't matter i if they have 1 field or 200 long text fields populated.



            Salesforce uses a simplistic method for calculating storage usage. Most standard and Custom objects are 2KB but some special objects like PersonAccount take 4KB(as its an account and contact)



            So in your case. 9999 records take



             (9999*2)/1024 = 19.52MB


            SRC: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=000193871&type=1






            share|improve this answer













            Data Storage is not calculated by the number of fields or content in the fields. It calculated as a number of records. Custom Object take 2KB per record. Doesn't matter i if they have 1 field or 200 long text fields populated.



            Salesforce uses a simplistic method for calculating storage usage. Most standard and Custom objects are 2KB but some special objects like PersonAccount take 4KB(as its an account and contact)



            So in your case. 9999 records take



             (9999*2)/1024 = 19.52MB


            SRC: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=000193871&type=1







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 3 at 12:54









            Pranay JaiswalPranay Jaiswal

            19.3k53263




            19.3k53263












            • There are also a few that only take 1k - CampaignMember comes to mind - but since you have have a lot of those, that can be helpful if you can use them in place of more 'expensive' objects

              – BritishBoyinDC
              May 4 at 18:44

















            • There are also a few that only take 1k - CampaignMember comes to mind - but since you have have a lot of those, that can be helpful if you can use them in place of more 'expensive' objects

              – BritishBoyinDC
              May 4 at 18:44
















            There are also a few that only take 1k - CampaignMember comes to mind - but since you have have a lot of those, that can be helpful if you can use them in place of more 'expensive' objects

            – BritishBoyinDC
            May 4 at 18:44





            There are also a few that only take 1k - CampaignMember comes to mind - but since you have have a lot of those, that can be helpful if you can use them in place of more 'expensive' objects

            – BritishBoyinDC
            May 4 at 18:44













            4














            What you are seeing in Data Storage is not based on the size of the field for respective object. The storage reflects the size of overall record that is stored in that object. Salesforce record size overview
            mentions that any record is roughly around 2KB in size (with some exceptions).



            In your case the storage is approximately around 19.5MB based on 9999 records for each object.






            share|improve this answer



























              4














              What you are seeing in Data Storage is not based on the size of the field for respective object. The storage reflects the size of overall record that is stored in that object. Salesforce record size overview
              mentions that any record is roughly around 2KB in size (with some exceptions).



              In your case the storage is approximately around 19.5MB based on 9999 records for each object.






              share|improve this answer

























                4












                4








                4







                What you are seeing in Data Storage is not based on the size of the field for respective object. The storage reflects the size of overall record that is stored in that object. Salesforce record size overview
                mentions that any record is roughly around 2KB in size (with some exceptions).



                In your case the storage is approximately around 19.5MB based on 9999 records for each object.






                share|improve this answer













                What you are seeing in Data Storage is not based on the size of the field for respective object. The storage reflects the size of overall record that is stored in that object. Salesforce record size overview
                mentions that any record is roughly around 2KB in size (with some exceptions).



                In your case the storage is approximately around 19.5MB based on 9999 records for each object.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered May 3 at 12:56









                Jayant DasJayant Das

                20.4k21332




                20.4k21332



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f261017%2fhow-is-per-object-storage-usage-calculated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

                    Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

                    What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company