Is there a word that describes the unjustified use of a more complex word?Combining a sentenceIs there a verb or word that means “mixing in coughs with your words as you speak”?Using the hypothetical and non standard word “manywhere”Is there a word for “that’s not my fault”?What is it called in English a term that describes the self dependency of a technical device?A specific word for “reality books”Is there a word that conveys a dark meaning for protective?Which word describes the freedom from interference?Is there a word for inserting a random line from a different language during a conversation?What do you call a company logo used for ad purpose?

Given 0s on Assignments with suspected and dismissed cheating?

Is Valonqar prophecy unfulfilled?

Motorola 6845 and bitwise graphics

How to describe a building set which is like LEGO without using the "LEGO" word?

Why do the lights go out when someone enters the dining room on this ship?

Alias for root of a polynomial

How to not get blinded by an attack at dawn

Why didn't the Avengers use this object earlier?

Help understanding this line - usage of くれる

Why doesn't Iron Man's action affect this person in Endgame?

is it correct to say "When it started to rain, I was in the open air."

Why is it harder to turn a motor/generator with shorted terminals?

Do we have C++20 ranges library in GCC 9?

How was this character able to keep fighting effectively in S8E5 of Game of Thrones?

Do Grothendieck universes matter for an algebraic geometer?

Polynomial division: Is this trick obvious?

Alexa-rank complaining about insecure generator meta-tag

Why was my Canon Speedlite 600EX triggering other flashes?

Will the volt, ampere, ohm or other electrical units change on May 20th, 2019?

Is this possible when it comes to the relations of P, NP, NP-Hard and NP-Complete?

Can you pick an advanced rogue talent with the Extra Rogue Talent feat?

Can a tourist shoot a gun for recreational purpose in the USA?

After Restoring Log Shipping to Secondary Server, First Stored Procedure Execution is Slow

Acronyms in HDD specification



Is there a word that describes the unjustified use of a more complex word?


Combining a sentenceIs there a verb or word that means “mixing in coughs with your words as you speak”?Using the hypothetical and non standard word “manywhere”Is there a word for “that’s not my fault”?What is it called in English a term that describes the self dependency of a technical device?A specific word for “reality books”Is there a word that conveys a dark meaning for protective?Which word describes the freedom from interference?Is there a word for inserting a random line from a different language during a conversation?What do you call a company logo used for ad purpose?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11















Is there a word that describes the unjustified use of a more complex word?



For example, using "didactic" instead of using the simpler "instructive" when the use of "didactic" is not justified in the context, as it could have been swapped with "instructive" without changing the meaning at all. There are some cases where it might be justified, but in our fictional example it is not.



How would you describe such writing or such a literary choice?










share|improve this question



















  • 7





    Would you accept a non-justifiably complex word?

    – Keith McClary
    May 3 at 5:20






  • 1





    OED has both didactic and instructive in frequency band 5, so I'm not sure this is the best example...

    – AakashM
    May 3 at 9:54











  • @AakashM - You may be right; educational might work better here. Incidentally, I found one website that recommends simpler language, but adds this caveat: Exception: when appropriate, use jargon common in your field. So perhaps didactic would be more appropriate than pretentious in a paper entitled Comparison between didactic lectures and small group discussions among second year medical undergraduates in pharmacology and published in a journal such as the IJBCP.

    – J.R.
    May 3 at 10:05


















11















Is there a word that describes the unjustified use of a more complex word?



For example, using "didactic" instead of using the simpler "instructive" when the use of "didactic" is not justified in the context, as it could have been swapped with "instructive" without changing the meaning at all. There are some cases where it might be justified, but in our fictional example it is not.



How would you describe such writing or such a literary choice?










share|improve this question



















  • 7





    Would you accept a non-justifiably complex word?

    – Keith McClary
    May 3 at 5:20






  • 1





    OED has both didactic and instructive in frequency band 5, so I'm not sure this is the best example...

    – AakashM
    May 3 at 9:54











  • @AakashM - You may be right; educational might work better here. Incidentally, I found one website that recommends simpler language, but adds this caveat: Exception: when appropriate, use jargon common in your field. So perhaps didactic would be more appropriate than pretentious in a paper entitled Comparison between didactic lectures and small group discussions among second year medical undergraduates in pharmacology and published in a journal such as the IJBCP.

    – J.R.
    May 3 at 10:05














11












11








11








Is there a word that describes the unjustified use of a more complex word?



For example, using "didactic" instead of using the simpler "instructive" when the use of "didactic" is not justified in the context, as it could have been swapped with "instructive" without changing the meaning at all. There are some cases where it might be justified, but in our fictional example it is not.



How would you describe such writing or such a literary choice?










share|improve this question
















Is there a word that describes the unjustified use of a more complex word?



For example, using "didactic" instead of using the simpler "instructive" when the use of "didactic" is not justified in the context, as it could have been swapped with "instructive" without changing the meaning at all. There are some cases where it might be justified, but in our fictional example it is not.



How would you describe such writing or such a literary choice?







word-request






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 3 at 9:58









V2Blast

15318




15318










asked May 3 at 0:48









blackbirdblackbird

957319




957319







  • 7





    Would you accept a non-justifiably complex word?

    – Keith McClary
    May 3 at 5:20






  • 1





    OED has both didactic and instructive in frequency band 5, so I'm not sure this is the best example...

    – AakashM
    May 3 at 9:54











  • @AakashM - You may be right; educational might work better here. Incidentally, I found one website that recommends simpler language, but adds this caveat: Exception: when appropriate, use jargon common in your field. So perhaps didactic would be more appropriate than pretentious in a paper entitled Comparison between didactic lectures and small group discussions among second year medical undergraduates in pharmacology and published in a journal such as the IJBCP.

    – J.R.
    May 3 at 10:05













  • 7





    Would you accept a non-justifiably complex word?

    – Keith McClary
    May 3 at 5:20






  • 1





    OED has both didactic and instructive in frequency band 5, so I'm not sure this is the best example...

    – AakashM
    May 3 at 9:54











  • @AakashM - You may be right; educational might work better here. Incidentally, I found one website that recommends simpler language, but adds this caveat: Exception: when appropriate, use jargon common in your field. So perhaps didactic would be more appropriate than pretentious in a paper entitled Comparison between didactic lectures and small group discussions among second year medical undergraduates in pharmacology and published in a journal such as the IJBCP.

    – J.R.
    May 3 at 10:05








7




7





Would you accept a non-justifiably complex word?

– Keith McClary
May 3 at 5:20





Would you accept a non-justifiably complex word?

– Keith McClary
May 3 at 5:20




1




1





OED has both didactic and instructive in frequency band 5, so I'm not sure this is the best example...

– AakashM
May 3 at 9:54





OED has both didactic and instructive in frequency band 5, so I'm not sure this is the best example...

– AakashM
May 3 at 9:54













@AakashM - You may be right; educational might work better here. Incidentally, I found one website that recommends simpler language, but adds this caveat: Exception: when appropriate, use jargon common in your field. So perhaps didactic would be more appropriate than pretentious in a paper entitled Comparison between didactic lectures and small group discussions among second year medical undergraduates in pharmacology and published in a journal such as the IJBCP.

– J.R.
May 3 at 10:05






@AakashM - You may be right; educational might work better here. Incidentally, I found one website that recommends simpler language, but adds this caveat: Exception: when appropriate, use jargon common in your field. So perhaps didactic would be more appropriate than pretentious in a paper entitled Comparison between didactic lectures and small group discussions among second year medical undergraduates in pharmacology and published in a journal such as the IJBCP.

– J.R.
May 3 at 10:05











11 Answers
11






active

oldest

votes


















27














Obfuscation where the result (intended or otherwise) is to make the meaning unclear.



Pretentious if the intention is to unnecessarily create an impression that the writer is more intelligent than the reader.






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    not pretentious but pretence, pretension, pretentiousness.

    – Toothrot
    May 4 at 22:23











  • @Toothrot Yes, pretentious if we are describing such writing or speech. On the other hand, you're right that obfuscation should match the same part of speech. On the third hand, obfuscatory is far less commonly used, which is presumably what Graham was thinking about.

    – lly
    May 5 at 15:44


















13














Normally you'd say something like "that's an unnecessarily elaborate word".



Except for verbose, none of the following are common, but I've marked the very rare:




  • rococo (adj) having elaborate ornamentation wiktionary (rare)


  • baroque (adj) very elaborate wiktionary


  • elegant variation describes using synonyms to avoid reusing a word wikipedia

  • the lure of the abstract describes the use abstract words instead of concrete ones Plain Words (rare)


  • circumlocution (noun) is a speaking around the topic and being very indirect (rare)


  • pleonasm (noun) covers the case of using too many words wikipedia (academic, rare)


  • sesquipedalian (adj) is the use of long words instead of short, only ever seen humourously wiktionary (academic, rare)


  • logorrhea (noun, rare) is using too many words, also verbosity and prolix


  • high falutin' (adj) is a pejorative phrase for "over-educated": "You and your high-falutin' words, just trying to confuse us!" (US, very informal)





share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    Sesquipedalian is what I would say, although it's a word that would only be understood by those who are already prone to this vice. :)

    – Andrew
    May 3 at 2:23







  • 1





    Or, even better, sesquipedalian loquacity — though that itself is verging on pleonastic :-)

    – gidds
    May 3 at 8:38











  • Want another rare and delicious word? How about grandiloquent?

    – Juhasz
    May 3 at 14:25






  • 2





    ten-dollar word (noun, idiomatic) A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated.

    – Canadian Yankee
    May 3 at 19:03


















11














You can call this flowery language.



According to Cambridge:




flowery (adj.): disapproving

If a speech or writing style is flowery, it uses too many complicated or unusual words or phrases.




Collins says:




flowery (adj.): full of figurative and ornate expressions and fine words
(said of language, style, etc.)




One writing coach advises:




Avoid “flowery” language at all costs! If necessary, throw out
your Thesaurus! Readers are more impressed by the quality of your ideas than your use of multi-syllabic terms.







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I would choose the word florid for the same purpose. Mirriam-Webster has "very flowery in style, florid prose; also having a florid style, a florid writer."

    – cooperised
    May 3 at 8:01












  • The thing that makes me struggle with "flowery" as an answer is, how does flowery imply unjustified? In other words, I'm sure there's writing that is flowery on purpose. I could see flowery describing language that was deliberately ornate or beautiful: poetry, lyrics, etc. I guess my point makes sense in light of the Collins definition but not the Cambridge definition.

    – dwizum
    May 3 at 16:06






  • 1





    @dwizum - I won't say that "flowery language" must imply "unjustified," but, from what I've seen, it's more often used as a negative criticism than as a praising compliment. Websites offering writing tips for resumes and cover letters say: Don’t use flowery language that doesn’t mean anything. Flowery language and excessive adverbs can come off as insincere. And a recent news article said: Sir Peter Bazalgette blames critics and curators for putting barriers between art and the public by using flowery and over-complex language to describe it.

    – J.R.
    May 3 at 19:35


















7














You can say that they are using big words. The idea behind the expression big words is that instead of using much simpler and more understandable to the average person words, some people intentionally choose to use words that sound more sophisticated, too intellectual or just clever. Oftentimes, the use of such words is unjustified. The main reason people do that is that they probably want to make themselves sound smarter than they really are. Here's how the Merriam-Webster Dictionary describes this expression:




a difficult word used to try to impress someone




And it also alongside the definition provides the following example sentence:




You don't need to use big words to make your point.







share|improve this answer
































    3














    The word pedantic would fit, in the sense of an ostentatious display of knowledge.




    Edit: Apparently this sense of pedantic is not very well known so to back the sense I mentioned:




    • pedantic, Merriam Webster (sense 2): "narrowly, stodgily, and often ostentatiously learned"


    • pedantry, Collins: "(British English) the habit or an instance of being a pedant, esp in the display of useless knowledge or minute observance of petty rules or details"


    • pedantic, Free dictionary (citing the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language): "Characterized by a narrow, often ostentatious concern for academic knowledge and formal rules"





    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      That doesn’t mean what the OP is asking at all.

      – Chris Melville
      May 3 at 15:39






    • 1





      @ChrisMelville it might not be a perfect fit depending on the context, but I fail to see why it's "not at all" what OP is asking

      – Erwan
      May 3 at 16:31











    • +1 That's the first word that came to my mind. It was certainly used in this context whenever I had educated relatives review my work in the editing phases. There are times where using a larger vocabulary is necessary - such as academic terms in an academic environment with the correct context to show that you do indeed know what you are talking about. However, if your audience is other than academia, use the more common and simpler words - otherwise you will be accused of showing off even if that's not your intent. (Some specialists can't help it, lost the lower vocabulary)

      – wolfsshield
      May 3 at 17:27






    • 2





      @wolfsshield - pedantic has nothing to do with showing off. Perhaps you are thinking of "pretentious". Pedantic: excessively concerned with minor details or rules; overscrupulous.

      – Martin Smith
      May 3 at 19:46












    • @Martin Smith Webster's 4th ed: pedant- 1 a person who puts unnecessary stress on minor or trivial points of learning, displaying a scholarship lacking in judgment or proportion..... I'd say showing off ones vocabulary unnecessarily fits

      – wolfsshield
      May 3 at 19:54



















    2














    Such a choice is a matter of tone and style. I'm not sure that I would ever agree that it could be "not justified" as there is always at least a subtle difference in rhythm and flow, and often in meaning. Intentionally choosing or avoiding words with latinate roots, for instance, can be valid style choices. Intentionally choosing a less well-known term can affect style, possibly giving an academic air, or a more everyday feel to a piece of prose. Also, a word's history, via its etymology, can influence how it will affect knowledgeable readers.



    So I might describe such a choice as "using a more intricate style" or "a more complex style". Style should suit purpose, of course. If the intended audience will not be likely to get a nuance, and may well misunderstand a word, that was a stylistically poor choice. If the intended effect will not be enhanced by a particular choice, that is also poor style.






    share|improve this answer






























      2














      sesquipedalian



      To use long words, usually to sound clever, confuse someone or obfuscate a point.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        This word is already included in jonathanjo's answer. (Your definition is different, though – but this answer could be improved if you tell us where your definition came from.)

        – J.R.
        May 3 at 20:46



















      2














      The word bombastic seems to exactly describe what you're looking for, because it implies the use of complicated words. Cambridge's definition:-



      using long and difficult words, usually to make people think you know more than you do:






      share|improve this answer






























        2














        To add a few more useful words:



        • Grandiloquent: Pompous or extravagant in language, style, or manner, especially in a way that is intended to impress.


        • Magniloquent: Using high-flown or bombastic language.


        Definitons are from Oxford English. (These definitions also indicate pompous, extravagant, high-flown & bombastic as useful words.) I appreciate the irony that these words are themselves grandiloquent :)






        share|improve this answer






























          2














          Most of the answers above involve such uncommon words as to be self-referential. A more common idiom only mentioned in @Canadian_Yankee's comment would be any of [using a]




          twenty-five cent word
          five-dollar word
          ten-dollar word



          [There's been a bit of inflation over the years. My dialect still uses the middle one.]



          They all have the same sense:




          A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated







          share|improve this answer






























            2














            An answer has already been accepted, but I think a reasonable alternative that comes to mind is




            jargon, which usually implies unnecessarily complex language, usually specific to a certain field.




            Using the more complex word outside of that field is almost always unjustified.






            share|improve this answer

























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "481"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209123%2fis-there-a-word-that-describes-the-unjustified-use-of-a-more-complex-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              11 Answers
              11






              active

              oldest

              votes








              11 Answers
              11






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              27














              Obfuscation where the result (intended or otherwise) is to make the meaning unclear.



              Pretentious if the intention is to unnecessarily create an impression that the writer is more intelligent than the reader.






              share|improve this answer


















              • 3





                not pretentious but pretence, pretension, pretentiousness.

                – Toothrot
                May 4 at 22:23











              • @Toothrot Yes, pretentious if we are describing such writing or speech. On the other hand, you're right that obfuscation should match the same part of speech. On the third hand, obfuscatory is far less commonly used, which is presumably what Graham was thinking about.

                – lly
                May 5 at 15:44















              27














              Obfuscation where the result (intended or otherwise) is to make the meaning unclear.



              Pretentious if the intention is to unnecessarily create an impression that the writer is more intelligent than the reader.






              share|improve this answer


















              • 3





                not pretentious but pretence, pretension, pretentiousness.

                – Toothrot
                May 4 at 22:23











              • @Toothrot Yes, pretentious if we are describing such writing or speech. On the other hand, you're right that obfuscation should match the same part of speech. On the third hand, obfuscatory is far less commonly used, which is presumably what Graham was thinking about.

                – lly
                May 5 at 15:44













              27












              27








              27







              Obfuscation where the result (intended or otherwise) is to make the meaning unclear.



              Pretentious if the intention is to unnecessarily create an impression that the writer is more intelligent than the reader.






              share|improve this answer













              Obfuscation where the result (intended or otherwise) is to make the meaning unclear.



              Pretentious if the intention is to unnecessarily create an impression that the writer is more intelligent than the reader.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 3 at 10:37









              GrahamGraham

              1,301410




              1,301410







              • 3





                not pretentious but pretence, pretension, pretentiousness.

                – Toothrot
                May 4 at 22:23











              • @Toothrot Yes, pretentious if we are describing such writing or speech. On the other hand, you're right that obfuscation should match the same part of speech. On the third hand, obfuscatory is far less commonly used, which is presumably what Graham was thinking about.

                – lly
                May 5 at 15:44












              • 3





                not pretentious but pretence, pretension, pretentiousness.

                – Toothrot
                May 4 at 22:23











              • @Toothrot Yes, pretentious if we are describing such writing or speech. On the other hand, you're right that obfuscation should match the same part of speech. On the third hand, obfuscatory is far less commonly used, which is presumably what Graham was thinking about.

                – lly
                May 5 at 15:44







              3




              3





              not pretentious but pretence, pretension, pretentiousness.

              – Toothrot
              May 4 at 22:23





              not pretentious but pretence, pretension, pretentiousness.

              – Toothrot
              May 4 at 22:23













              @Toothrot Yes, pretentious if we are describing such writing or speech. On the other hand, you're right that obfuscation should match the same part of speech. On the third hand, obfuscatory is far less commonly used, which is presumably what Graham was thinking about.

              – lly
              May 5 at 15:44





              @Toothrot Yes, pretentious if we are describing such writing or speech. On the other hand, you're right that obfuscation should match the same part of speech. On the third hand, obfuscatory is far less commonly used, which is presumably what Graham was thinking about.

              – lly
              May 5 at 15:44













              13














              Normally you'd say something like "that's an unnecessarily elaborate word".



              Except for verbose, none of the following are common, but I've marked the very rare:




              • rococo (adj) having elaborate ornamentation wiktionary (rare)


              • baroque (adj) very elaborate wiktionary


              • elegant variation describes using synonyms to avoid reusing a word wikipedia

              • the lure of the abstract describes the use abstract words instead of concrete ones Plain Words (rare)


              • circumlocution (noun) is a speaking around the topic and being very indirect (rare)


              • pleonasm (noun) covers the case of using too many words wikipedia (academic, rare)


              • sesquipedalian (adj) is the use of long words instead of short, only ever seen humourously wiktionary (academic, rare)


              • logorrhea (noun, rare) is using too many words, also verbosity and prolix


              • high falutin' (adj) is a pejorative phrase for "over-educated": "You and your high-falutin' words, just trying to confuse us!" (US, very informal)





              share|improve this answer




















              • 4





                Sesquipedalian is what I would say, although it's a word that would only be understood by those who are already prone to this vice. :)

                – Andrew
                May 3 at 2:23







              • 1





                Or, even better, sesquipedalian loquacity — though that itself is verging on pleonastic :-)

                – gidds
                May 3 at 8:38











              • Want another rare and delicious word? How about grandiloquent?

                – Juhasz
                May 3 at 14:25






              • 2





                ten-dollar word (noun, idiomatic) A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated.

                – Canadian Yankee
                May 3 at 19:03















              13














              Normally you'd say something like "that's an unnecessarily elaborate word".



              Except for verbose, none of the following are common, but I've marked the very rare:




              • rococo (adj) having elaborate ornamentation wiktionary (rare)


              • baroque (adj) very elaborate wiktionary


              • elegant variation describes using synonyms to avoid reusing a word wikipedia

              • the lure of the abstract describes the use abstract words instead of concrete ones Plain Words (rare)


              • circumlocution (noun) is a speaking around the topic and being very indirect (rare)


              • pleonasm (noun) covers the case of using too many words wikipedia (academic, rare)


              • sesquipedalian (adj) is the use of long words instead of short, only ever seen humourously wiktionary (academic, rare)


              • logorrhea (noun, rare) is using too many words, also verbosity and prolix


              • high falutin' (adj) is a pejorative phrase for "over-educated": "You and your high-falutin' words, just trying to confuse us!" (US, very informal)





              share|improve this answer




















              • 4





                Sesquipedalian is what I would say, although it's a word that would only be understood by those who are already prone to this vice. :)

                – Andrew
                May 3 at 2:23







              • 1





                Or, even better, sesquipedalian loquacity — though that itself is verging on pleonastic :-)

                – gidds
                May 3 at 8:38











              • Want another rare and delicious word? How about grandiloquent?

                – Juhasz
                May 3 at 14:25






              • 2





                ten-dollar word (noun, idiomatic) A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated.

                – Canadian Yankee
                May 3 at 19:03













              13












              13








              13







              Normally you'd say something like "that's an unnecessarily elaborate word".



              Except for verbose, none of the following are common, but I've marked the very rare:




              • rococo (adj) having elaborate ornamentation wiktionary (rare)


              • baroque (adj) very elaborate wiktionary


              • elegant variation describes using synonyms to avoid reusing a word wikipedia

              • the lure of the abstract describes the use abstract words instead of concrete ones Plain Words (rare)


              • circumlocution (noun) is a speaking around the topic and being very indirect (rare)


              • pleonasm (noun) covers the case of using too many words wikipedia (academic, rare)


              • sesquipedalian (adj) is the use of long words instead of short, only ever seen humourously wiktionary (academic, rare)


              • logorrhea (noun, rare) is using too many words, also verbosity and prolix


              • high falutin' (adj) is a pejorative phrase for "over-educated": "You and your high-falutin' words, just trying to confuse us!" (US, very informal)





              share|improve this answer















              Normally you'd say something like "that's an unnecessarily elaborate word".



              Except for verbose, none of the following are common, but I've marked the very rare:




              • rococo (adj) having elaborate ornamentation wiktionary (rare)


              • baroque (adj) very elaborate wiktionary


              • elegant variation describes using synonyms to avoid reusing a word wikipedia

              • the lure of the abstract describes the use abstract words instead of concrete ones Plain Words (rare)


              • circumlocution (noun) is a speaking around the topic and being very indirect (rare)


              • pleonasm (noun) covers the case of using too many words wikipedia (academic, rare)


              • sesquipedalian (adj) is the use of long words instead of short, only ever seen humourously wiktionary (academic, rare)


              • logorrhea (noun, rare) is using too many words, also verbosity and prolix


              • high falutin' (adj) is a pejorative phrase for "over-educated": "You and your high-falutin' words, just trying to confuse us!" (US, very informal)






              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited May 3 at 1:33

























              answered May 3 at 1:06









              jonathanjojonathanjo

              2,806115




              2,806115







              • 4





                Sesquipedalian is what I would say, although it's a word that would only be understood by those who are already prone to this vice. :)

                – Andrew
                May 3 at 2:23







              • 1





                Or, even better, sesquipedalian loquacity — though that itself is verging on pleonastic :-)

                – gidds
                May 3 at 8:38











              • Want another rare and delicious word? How about grandiloquent?

                – Juhasz
                May 3 at 14:25






              • 2





                ten-dollar word (noun, idiomatic) A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated.

                – Canadian Yankee
                May 3 at 19:03












              • 4





                Sesquipedalian is what I would say, although it's a word that would only be understood by those who are already prone to this vice. :)

                – Andrew
                May 3 at 2:23







              • 1





                Or, even better, sesquipedalian loquacity — though that itself is verging on pleonastic :-)

                – gidds
                May 3 at 8:38











              • Want another rare and delicious word? How about grandiloquent?

                – Juhasz
                May 3 at 14:25






              • 2





                ten-dollar word (noun, idiomatic) A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated.

                – Canadian Yankee
                May 3 at 19:03







              4




              4





              Sesquipedalian is what I would say, although it's a word that would only be understood by those who are already prone to this vice. :)

              – Andrew
              May 3 at 2:23






              Sesquipedalian is what I would say, although it's a word that would only be understood by those who are already prone to this vice. :)

              – Andrew
              May 3 at 2:23





              1




              1





              Or, even better, sesquipedalian loquacity — though that itself is verging on pleonastic :-)

              – gidds
              May 3 at 8:38





              Or, even better, sesquipedalian loquacity — though that itself is verging on pleonastic :-)

              – gidds
              May 3 at 8:38













              Want another rare and delicious word? How about grandiloquent?

              – Juhasz
              May 3 at 14:25





              Want another rare and delicious word? How about grandiloquent?

              – Juhasz
              May 3 at 14:25




              2




              2





              ten-dollar word (noun, idiomatic) A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated.

              – Canadian Yankee
              May 3 at 19:03





              ten-dollar word (noun, idiomatic) A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated.

              – Canadian Yankee
              May 3 at 19:03











              11














              You can call this flowery language.



              According to Cambridge:




              flowery (adj.): disapproving

              If a speech or writing style is flowery, it uses too many complicated or unusual words or phrases.




              Collins says:




              flowery (adj.): full of figurative and ornate expressions and fine words
              (said of language, style, etc.)




              One writing coach advises:




              Avoid “flowery” language at all costs! If necessary, throw out
              your Thesaurus! Readers are more impressed by the quality of your ideas than your use of multi-syllabic terms.







              share|improve this answer




















              • 1





                I would choose the word florid for the same purpose. Mirriam-Webster has "very flowery in style, florid prose; also having a florid style, a florid writer."

                – cooperised
                May 3 at 8:01












              • The thing that makes me struggle with "flowery" as an answer is, how does flowery imply unjustified? In other words, I'm sure there's writing that is flowery on purpose. I could see flowery describing language that was deliberately ornate or beautiful: poetry, lyrics, etc. I guess my point makes sense in light of the Collins definition but not the Cambridge definition.

                – dwizum
                May 3 at 16:06






              • 1





                @dwizum - I won't say that "flowery language" must imply "unjustified," but, from what I've seen, it's more often used as a negative criticism than as a praising compliment. Websites offering writing tips for resumes and cover letters say: Don’t use flowery language that doesn’t mean anything. Flowery language and excessive adverbs can come off as insincere. And a recent news article said: Sir Peter Bazalgette blames critics and curators for putting barriers between art and the public by using flowery and over-complex language to describe it.

                – J.R.
                May 3 at 19:35















              11














              You can call this flowery language.



              According to Cambridge:




              flowery (adj.): disapproving

              If a speech or writing style is flowery, it uses too many complicated or unusual words or phrases.




              Collins says:




              flowery (adj.): full of figurative and ornate expressions and fine words
              (said of language, style, etc.)




              One writing coach advises:




              Avoid “flowery” language at all costs! If necessary, throw out
              your Thesaurus! Readers are more impressed by the quality of your ideas than your use of multi-syllabic terms.







              share|improve this answer




















              • 1





                I would choose the word florid for the same purpose. Mirriam-Webster has "very flowery in style, florid prose; also having a florid style, a florid writer."

                – cooperised
                May 3 at 8:01












              • The thing that makes me struggle with "flowery" as an answer is, how does flowery imply unjustified? In other words, I'm sure there's writing that is flowery on purpose. I could see flowery describing language that was deliberately ornate or beautiful: poetry, lyrics, etc. I guess my point makes sense in light of the Collins definition but not the Cambridge definition.

                – dwizum
                May 3 at 16:06






              • 1





                @dwizum - I won't say that "flowery language" must imply "unjustified," but, from what I've seen, it's more often used as a negative criticism than as a praising compliment. Websites offering writing tips for resumes and cover letters say: Don’t use flowery language that doesn’t mean anything. Flowery language and excessive adverbs can come off as insincere. And a recent news article said: Sir Peter Bazalgette blames critics and curators for putting barriers between art and the public by using flowery and over-complex language to describe it.

                – J.R.
                May 3 at 19:35













              11












              11








              11







              You can call this flowery language.



              According to Cambridge:




              flowery (adj.): disapproving

              If a speech or writing style is flowery, it uses too many complicated or unusual words or phrases.




              Collins says:




              flowery (adj.): full of figurative and ornate expressions and fine words
              (said of language, style, etc.)




              One writing coach advises:




              Avoid “flowery” language at all costs! If necessary, throw out
              your Thesaurus! Readers are more impressed by the quality of your ideas than your use of multi-syllabic terms.







              share|improve this answer















              You can call this flowery language.



              According to Cambridge:




              flowery (adj.): disapproving

              If a speech or writing style is flowery, it uses too many complicated or unusual words or phrases.




              Collins says:




              flowery (adj.): full of figurative and ornate expressions and fine words
              (said of language, style, etc.)




              One writing coach advises:




              Avoid “flowery” language at all costs! If necessary, throw out
              your Thesaurus! Readers are more impressed by the quality of your ideas than your use of multi-syllabic terms.








              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited May 3 at 9:55









              V2Blast

              15318




              15318










              answered May 3 at 2:32









              J.R.J.R.

              101k8129250




              101k8129250







              • 1





                I would choose the word florid for the same purpose. Mirriam-Webster has "very flowery in style, florid prose; also having a florid style, a florid writer."

                – cooperised
                May 3 at 8:01












              • The thing that makes me struggle with "flowery" as an answer is, how does flowery imply unjustified? In other words, I'm sure there's writing that is flowery on purpose. I could see flowery describing language that was deliberately ornate or beautiful: poetry, lyrics, etc. I guess my point makes sense in light of the Collins definition but not the Cambridge definition.

                – dwizum
                May 3 at 16:06






              • 1





                @dwizum - I won't say that "flowery language" must imply "unjustified," but, from what I've seen, it's more often used as a negative criticism than as a praising compliment. Websites offering writing tips for resumes and cover letters say: Don’t use flowery language that doesn’t mean anything. Flowery language and excessive adverbs can come off as insincere. And a recent news article said: Sir Peter Bazalgette blames critics and curators for putting barriers between art and the public by using flowery and over-complex language to describe it.

                – J.R.
                May 3 at 19:35












              • 1





                I would choose the word florid for the same purpose. Mirriam-Webster has "very flowery in style, florid prose; also having a florid style, a florid writer."

                – cooperised
                May 3 at 8:01












              • The thing that makes me struggle with "flowery" as an answer is, how does flowery imply unjustified? In other words, I'm sure there's writing that is flowery on purpose. I could see flowery describing language that was deliberately ornate or beautiful: poetry, lyrics, etc. I guess my point makes sense in light of the Collins definition but not the Cambridge definition.

                – dwizum
                May 3 at 16:06






              • 1





                @dwizum - I won't say that "flowery language" must imply "unjustified," but, from what I've seen, it's more often used as a negative criticism than as a praising compliment. Websites offering writing tips for resumes and cover letters say: Don’t use flowery language that doesn’t mean anything. Flowery language and excessive adverbs can come off as insincere. And a recent news article said: Sir Peter Bazalgette blames critics and curators for putting barriers between art and the public by using flowery and over-complex language to describe it.

                – J.R.
                May 3 at 19:35







              1




              1





              I would choose the word florid for the same purpose. Mirriam-Webster has "very flowery in style, florid prose; also having a florid style, a florid writer."

              – cooperised
              May 3 at 8:01






              I would choose the word florid for the same purpose. Mirriam-Webster has "very flowery in style, florid prose; also having a florid style, a florid writer."

              – cooperised
              May 3 at 8:01














              The thing that makes me struggle with "flowery" as an answer is, how does flowery imply unjustified? In other words, I'm sure there's writing that is flowery on purpose. I could see flowery describing language that was deliberately ornate or beautiful: poetry, lyrics, etc. I guess my point makes sense in light of the Collins definition but not the Cambridge definition.

              – dwizum
              May 3 at 16:06





              The thing that makes me struggle with "flowery" as an answer is, how does flowery imply unjustified? In other words, I'm sure there's writing that is flowery on purpose. I could see flowery describing language that was deliberately ornate or beautiful: poetry, lyrics, etc. I guess my point makes sense in light of the Collins definition but not the Cambridge definition.

              – dwizum
              May 3 at 16:06




              1




              1





              @dwizum - I won't say that "flowery language" must imply "unjustified," but, from what I've seen, it's more often used as a negative criticism than as a praising compliment. Websites offering writing tips for resumes and cover letters say: Don’t use flowery language that doesn’t mean anything. Flowery language and excessive adverbs can come off as insincere. And a recent news article said: Sir Peter Bazalgette blames critics and curators for putting barriers between art and the public by using flowery and over-complex language to describe it.

              – J.R.
              May 3 at 19:35





              @dwizum - I won't say that "flowery language" must imply "unjustified," but, from what I've seen, it's more often used as a negative criticism than as a praising compliment. Websites offering writing tips for resumes and cover letters say: Don’t use flowery language that doesn’t mean anything. Flowery language and excessive adverbs can come off as insincere. And a recent news article said: Sir Peter Bazalgette blames critics and curators for putting barriers between art and the public by using flowery and over-complex language to describe it.

              – J.R.
              May 3 at 19:35











              7














              You can say that they are using big words. The idea behind the expression big words is that instead of using much simpler and more understandable to the average person words, some people intentionally choose to use words that sound more sophisticated, too intellectual or just clever. Oftentimes, the use of such words is unjustified. The main reason people do that is that they probably want to make themselves sound smarter than they really are. Here's how the Merriam-Webster Dictionary describes this expression:




              a difficult word used to try to impress someone




              And it also alongside the definition provides the following example sentence:




              You don't need to use big words to make your point.







              share|improve this answer





























                7














                You can say that they are using big words. The idea behind the expression big words is that instead of using much simpler and more understandable to the average person words, some people intentionally choose to use words that sound more sophisticated, too intellectual or just clever. Oftentimes, the use of such words is unjustified. The main reason people do that is that they probably want to make themselves sound smarter than they really are. Here's how the Merriam-Webster Dictionary describes this expression:




                a difficult word used to try to impress someone




                And it also alongside the definition provides the following example sentence:




                You don't need to use big words to make your point.







                share|improve this answer



























                  7












                  7








                  7







                  You can say that they are using big words. The idea behind the expression big words is that instead of using much simpler and more understandable to the average person words, some people intentionally choose to use words that sound more sophisticated, too intellectual or just clever. Oftentimes, the use of such words is unjustified. The main reason people do that is that they probably want to make themselves sound smarter than they really are. Here's how the Merriam-Webster Dictionary describes this expression:




                  a difficult word used to try to impress someone




                  And it also alongside the definition provides the following example sentence:




                  You don't need to use big words to make your point.







                  share|improve this answer















                  You can say that they are using big words. The idea behind the expression big words is that instead of using much simpler and more understandable to the average person words, some people intentionally choose to use words that sound more sophisticated, too intellectual or just clever. Oftentimes, the use of such words is unjustified. The main reason people do that is that they probably want to make themselves sound smarter than they really are. Here's how the Merriam-Webster Dictionary describes this expression:




                  a difficult word used to try to impress someone




                  And it also alongside the definition provides the following example sentence:




                  You don't need to use big words to make your point.








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited May 3 at 11:08

























                  answered May 3 at 11:01









                  Michael RybkinMichael Rybkin

                  27.7k11112246




                  27.7k11112246





















                      3














                      The word pedantic would fit, in the sense of an ostentatious display of knowledge.




                      Edit: Apparently this sense of pedantic is not very well known so to back the sense I mentioned:




                      • pedantic, Merriam Webster (sense 2): "narrowly, stodgily, and often ostentatiously learned"


                      • pedantry, Collins: "(British English) the habit or an instance of being a pedant, esp in the display of useless knowledge or minute observance of petty rules or details"


                      • pedantic, Free dictionary (citing the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language): "Characterized by a narrow, often ostentatious concern for academic knowledge and formal rules"





                      share|improve this answer




















                      • 3





                        That doesn’t mean what the OP is asking at all.

                        – Chris Melville
                        May 3 at 15:39






                      • 1





                        @ChrisMelville it might not be a perfect fit depending on the context, but I fail to see why it's "not at all" what OP is asking

                        – Erwan
                        May 3 at 16:31











                      • +1 That's the first word that came to my mind. It was certainly used in this context whenever I had educated relatives review my work in the editing phases. There are times where using a larger vocabulary is necessary - such as academic terms in an academic environment with the correct context to show that you do indeed know what you are talking about. However, if your audience is other than academia, use the more common and simpler words - otherwise you will be accused of showing off even if that's not your intent. (Some specialists can't help it, lost the lower vocabulary)

                        – wolfsshield
                        May 3 at 17:27






                      • 2





                        @wolfsshield - pedantic has nothing to do with showing off. Perhaps you are thinking of "pretentious". Pedantic: excessively concerned with minor details or rules; overscrupulous.

                        – Martin Smith
                        May 3 at 19:46












                      • @Martin Smith Webster's 4th ed: pedant- 1 a person who puts unnecessary stress on minor or trivial points of learning, displaying a scholarship lacking in judgment or proportion..... I'd say showing off ones vocabulary unnecessarily fits

                        – wolfsshield
                        May 3 at 19:54
















                      3














                      The word pedantic would fit, in the sense of an ostentatious display of knowledge.




                      Edit: Apparently this sense of pedantic is not very well known so to back the sense I mentioned:




                      • pedantic, Merriam Webster (sense 2): "narrowly, stodgily, and often ostentatiously learned"


                      • pedantry, Collins: "(British English) the habit or an instance of being a pedant, esp in the display of useless knowledge or minute observance of petty rules or details"


                      • pedantic, Free dictionary (citing the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language): "Characterized by a narrow, often ostentatious concern for academic knowledge and formal rules"





                      share|improve this answer




















                      • 3





                        That doesn’t mean what the OP is asking at all.

                        – Chris Melville
                        May 3 at 15:39






                      • 1





                        @ChrisMelville it might not be a perfect fit depending on the context, but I fail to see why it's "not at all" what OP is asking

                        – Erwan
                        May 3 at 16:31











                      • +1 That's the first word that came to my mind. It was certainly used in this context whenever I had educated relatives review my work in the editing phases. There are times where using a larger vocabulary is necessary - such as academic terms in an academic environment with the correct context to show that you do indeed know what you are talking about. However, if your audience is other than academia, use the more common and simpler words - otherwise you will be accused of showing off even if that's not your intent. (Some specialists can't help it, lost the lower vocabulary)

                        – wolfsshield
                        May 3 at 17:27






                      • 2





                        @wolfsshield - pedantic has nothing to do with showing off. Perhaps you are thinking of "pretentious". Pedantic: excessively concerned with minor details or rules; overscrupulous.

                        – Martin Smith
                        May 3 at 19:46












                      • @Martin Smith Webster's 4th ed: pedant- 1 a person who puts unnecessary stress on minor or trivial points of learning, displaying a scholarship lacking in judgment or proportion..... I'd say showing off ones vocabulary unnecessarily fits

                        – wolfsshield
                        May 3 at 19:54














                      3












                      3








                      3







                      The word pedantic would fit, in the sense of an ostentatious display of knowledge.




                      Edit: Apparently this sense of pedantic is not very well known so to back the sense I mentioned:




                      • pedantic, Merriam Webster (sense 2): "narrowly, stodgily, and often ostentatiously learned"


                      • pedantry, Collins: "(British English) the habit or an instance of being a pedant, esp in the display of useless knowledge or minute observance of petty rules or details"


                      • pedantic, Free dictionary (citing the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language): "Characterized by a narrow, often ostentatious concern for academic knowledge and formal rules"





                      share|improve this answer















                      The word pedantic would fit, in the sense of an ostentatious display of knowledge.




                      Edit: Apparently this sense of pedantic is not very well known so to back the sense I mentioned:




                      • pedantic, Merriam Webster (sense 2): "narrowly, stodgily, and often ostentatiously learned"


                      • pedantry, Collins: "(British English) the habit or an instance of being a pedant, esp in the display of useless knowledge or minute observance of petty rules or details"


                      • pedantic, Free dictionary (citing the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language): "Characterized by a narrow, often ostentatious concern for academic knowledge and formal rules"






                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited May 4 at 0:17

























                      answered May 3 at 11:02









                      ErwanErwan

                      1973




                      1973







                      • 3





                        That doesn’t mean what the OP is asking at all.

                        – Chris Melville
                        May 3 at 15:39






                      • 1





                        @ChrisMelville it might not be a perfect fit depending on the context, but I fail to see why it's "not at all" what OP is asking

                        – Erwan
                        May 3 at 16:31











                      • +1 That's the first word that came to my mind. It was certainly used in this context whenever I had educated relatives review my work in the editing phases. There are times where using a larger vocabulary is necessary - such as academic terms in an academic environment with the correct context to show that you do indeed know what you are talking about. However, if your audience is other than academia, use the more common and simpler words - otherwise you will be accused of showing off even if that's not your intent. (Some specialists can't help it, lost the lower vocabulary)

                        – wolfsshield
                        May 3 at 17:27






                      • 2





                        @wolfsshield - pedantic has nothing to do with showing off. Perhaps you are thinking of "pretentious". Pedantic: excessively concerned with minor details or rules; overscrupulous.

                        – Martin Smith
                        May 3 at 19:46












                      • @Martin Smith Webster's 4th ed: pedant- 1 a person who puts unnecessary stress on minor or trivial points of learning, displaying a scholarship lacking in judgment or proportion..... I'd say showing off ones vocabulary unnecessarily fits

                        – wolfsshield
                        May 3 at 19:54













                      • 3





                        That doesn’t mean what the OP is asking at all.

                        – Chris Melville
                        May 3 at 15:39






                      • 1





                        @ChrisMelville it might not be a perfect fit depending on the context, but I fail to see why it's "not at all" what OP is asking

                        – Erwan
                        May 3 at 16:31











                      • +1 That's the first word that came to my mind. It was certainly used in this context whenever I had educated relatives review my work in the editing phases. There are times where using a larger vocabulary is necessary - such as academic terms in an academic environment with the correct context to show that you do indeed know what you are talking about. However, if your audience is other than academia, use the more common and simpler words - otherwise you will be accused of showing off even if that's not your intent. (Some specialists can't help it, lost the lower vocabulary)

                        – wolfsshield
                        May 3 at 17:27






                      • 2





                        @wolfsshield - pedantic has nothing to do with showing off. Perhaps you are thinking of "pretentious". Pedantic: excessively concerned with minor details or rules; overscrupulous.

                        – Martin Smith
                        May 3 at 19:46












                      • @Martin Smith Webster's 4th ed: pedant- 1 a person who puts unnecessary stress on minor or trivial points of learning, displaying a scholarship lacking in judgment or proportion..... I'd say showing off ones vocabulary unnecessarily fits

                        – wolfsshield
                        May 3 at 19:54








                      3




                      3





                      That doesn’t mean what the OP is asking at all.

                      – Chris Melville
                      May 3 at 15:39





                      That doesn’t mean what the OP is asking at all.

                      – Chris Melville
                      May 3 at 15:39




                      1




                      1





                      @ChrisMelville it might not be a perfect fit depending on the context, but I fail to see why it's "not at all" what OP is asking

                      – Erwan
                      May 3 at 16:31





                      @ChrisMelville it might not be a perfect fit depending on the context, but I fail to see why it's "not at all" what OP is asking

                      – Erwan
                      May 3 at 16:31













                      +1 That's the first word that came to my mind. It was certainly used in this context whenever I had educated relatives review my work in the editing phases. There are times where using a larger vocabulary is necessary - such as academic terms in an academic environment with the correct context to show that you do indeed know what you are talking about. However, if your audience is other than academia, use the more common and simpler words - otherwise you will be accused of showing off even if that's not your intent. (Some specialists can't help it, lost the lower vocabulary)

                      – wolfsshield
                      May 3 at 17:27





                      +1 That's the first word that came to my mind. It was certainly used in this context whenever I had educated relatives review my work in the editing phases. There are times where using a larger vocabulary is necessary - such as academic terms in an academic environment with the correct context to show that you do indeed know what you are talking about. However, if your audience is other than academia, use the more common and simpler words - otherwise you will be accused of showing off even if that's not your intent. (Some specialists can't help it, lost the lower vocabulary)

                      – wolfsshield
                      May 3 at 17:27




                      2




                      2





                      @wolfsshield - pedantic has nothing to do with showing off. Perhaps you are thinking of "pretentious". Pedantic: excessively concerned with minor details or rules; overscrupulous.

                      – Martin Smith
                      May 3 at 19:46






                      @wolfsshield - pedantic has nothing to do with showing off. Perhaps you are thinking of "pretentious". Pedantic: excessively concerned with minor details or rules; overscrupulous.

                      – Martin Smith
                      May 3 at 19:46














                      @Martin Smith Webster's 4th ed: pedant- 1 a person who puts unnecessary stress on minor or trivial points of learning, displaying a scholarship lacking in judgment or proportion..... I'd say showing off ones vocabulary unnecessarily fits

                      – wolfsshield
                      May 3 at 19:54






                      @Martin Smith Webster's 4th ed: pedant- 1 a person who puts unnecessary stress on minor or trivial points of learning, displaying a scholarship lacking in judgment or proportion..... I'd say showing off ones vocabulary unnecessarily fits

                      – wolfsshield
                      May 3 at 19:54












                      2














                      Such a choice is a matter of tone and style. I'm not sure that I would ever agree that it could be "not justified" as there is always at least a subtle difference in rhythm and flow, and often in meaning. Intentionally choosing or avoiding words with latinate roots, for instance, can be valid style choices. Intentionally choosing a less well-known term can affect style, possibly giving an academic air, or a more everyday feel to a piece of prose. Also, a word's history, via its etymology, can influence how it will affect knowledgeable readers.



                      So I might describe such a choice as "using a more intricate style" or "a more complex style". Style should suit purpose, of course. If the intended audience will not be likely to get a nuance, and may well misunderstand a word, that was a stylistically poor choice. If the intended effect will not be enhanced by a particular choice, that is also poor style.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        2














                        Such a choice is a matter of tone and style. I'm not sure that I would ever agree that it could be "not justified" as there is always at least a subtle difference in rhythm and flow, and often in meaning. Intentionally choosing or avoiding words with latinate roots, for instance, can be valid style choices. Intentionally choosing a less well-known term can affect style, possibly giving an academic air, or a more everyday feel to a piece of prose. Also, a word's history, via its etymology, can influence how it will affect knowledgeable readers.



                        So I might describe such a choice as "using a more intricate style" or "a more complex style". Style should suit purpose, of course. If the intended audience will not be likely to get a nuance, and may well misunderstand a word, that was a stylistically poor choice. If the intended effect will not be enhanced by a particular choice, that is also poor style.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          2












                          2








                          2







                          Such a choice is a matter of tone and style. I'm not sure that I would ever agree that it could be "not justified" as there is always at least a subtle difference in rhythm and flow, and often in meaning. Intentionally choosing or avoiding words with latinate roots, for instance, can be valid style choices. Intentionally choosing a less well-known term can affect style, possibly giving an academic air, or a more everyday feel to a piece of prose. Also, a word's history, via its etymology, can influence how it will affect knowledgeable readers.



                          So I might describe such a choice as "using a more intricate style" or "a more complex style". Style should suit purpose, of course. If the intended audience will not be likely to get a nuance, and may well misunderstand a word, that was a stylistically poor choice. If the intended effect will not be enhanced by a particular choice, that is also poor style.






                          share|improve this answer













                          Such a choice is a matter of tone and style. I'm not sure that I would ever agree that it could be "not justified" as there is always at least a subtle difference in rhythm and flow, and often in meaning. Intentionally choosing or avoiding words with latinate roots, for instance, can be valid style choices. Intentionally choosing a less well-known term can affect style, possibly giving an academic air, or a more everyday feel to a piece of prose. Also, a word's history, via its etymology, can influence how it will affect knowledgeable readers.



                          So I might describe such a choice as "using a more intricate style" or "a more complex style". Style should suit purpose, of course. If the intended audience will not be likely to get a nuance, and may well misunderstand a word, that was a stylistically poor choice. If the intended effect will not be enhanced by a particular choice, that is also poor style.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered May 3 at 1:04









                          David SiegelDavid Siegel

                          5,392522




                          5,392522





















                              2














                              sesquipedalian



                              To use long words, usually to sound clever, confuse someone or obfuscate a point.






                              share|improve this answer


















                              • 1





                                This word is already included in jonathanjo's answer. (Your definition is different, though – but this answer could be improved if you tell us where your definition came from.)

                                – J.R.
                                May 3 at 20:46
















                              2














                              sesquipedalian



                              To use long words, usually to sound clever, confuse someone or obfuscate a point.






                              share|improve this answer


















                              • 1





                                This word is already included in jonathanjo's answer. (Your definition is different, though – but this answer could be improved if you tell us where your definition came from.)

                                – J.R.
                                May 3 at 20:46














                              2












                              2








                              2







                              sesquipedalian



                              To use long words, usually to sound clever, confuse someone or obfuscate a point.






                              share|improve this answer













                              sesquipedalian



                              To use long words, usually to sound clever, confuse someone or obfuscate a point.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered May 3 at 14:03









                              BanksySanBanksySan

                              1833




                              1833







                              • 1





                                This word is already included in jonathanjo's answer. (Your definition is different, though – but this answer could be improved if you tell us where your definition came from.)

                                – J.R.
                                May 3 at 20:46













                              • 1





                                This word is already included in jonathanjo's answer. (Your definition is different, though – but this answer could be improved if you tell us where your definition came from.)

                                – J.R.
                                May 3 at 20:46








                              1




                              1





                              This word is already included in jonathanjo's answer. (Your definition is different, though – but this answer could be improved if you tell us where your definition came from.)

                              – J.R.
                              May 3 at 20:46






                              This word is already included in jonathanjo's answer. (Your definition is different, though – but this answer could be improved if you tell us where your definition came from.)

                              – J.R.
                              May 3 at 20:46












                              2














                              The word bombastic seems to exactly describe what you're looking for, because it implies the use of complicated words. Cambridge's definition:-



                              using long and difficult words, usually to make people think you know more than you do:






                              share|improve this answer



























                                2














                                The word bombastic seems to exactly describe what you're looking for, because it implies the use of complicated words. Cambridge's definition:-



                                using long and difficult words, usually to make people think you know more than you do:






                                share|improve this answer

























                                  2












                                  2








                                  2







                                  The word bombastic seems to exactly describe what you're looking for, because it implies the use of complicated words. Cambridge's definition:-



                                  using long and difficult words, usually to make people think you know more than you do:






                                  share|improve this answer













                                  The word bombastic seems to exactly describe what you're looking for, because it implies the use of complicated words. Cambridge's definition:-



                                  using long and difficult words, usually to make people think you know more than you do:







                                  share|improve this answer












                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer










                                  answered May 3 at 23:37









                                  Ng Oon-EeNg Oon-Ee

                                  1211




                                  1211





















                                      2














                                      To add a few more useful words:



                                      • Grandiloquent: Pompous or extravagant in language, style, or manner, especially in a way that is intended to impress.


                                      • Magniloquent: Using high-flown or bombastic language.


                                      Definitons are from Oxford English. (These definitions also indicate pompous, extravagant, high-flown & bombastic as useful words.) I appreciate the irony that these words are themselves grandiloquent :)






                                      share|improve this answer



























                                        2














                                        To add a few more useful words:



                                        • Grandiloquent: Pompous or extravagant in language, style, or manner, especially in a way that is intended to impress.


                                        • Magniloquent: Using high-flown or bombastic language.


                                        Definitons are from Oxford English. (These definitions also indicate pompous, extravagant, high-flown & bombastic as useful words.) I appreciate the irony that these words are themselves grandiloquent :)






                                        share|improve this answer

























                                          2












                                          2








                                          2







                                          To add a few more useful words:



                                          • Grandiloquent: Pompous or extravagant in language, style, or manner, especially in a way that is intended to impress.


                                          • Magniloquent: Using high-flown or bombastic language.


                                          Definitons are from Oxford English. (These definitions also indicate pompous, extravagant, high-flown & bombastic as useful words.) I appreciate the irony that these words are themselves grandiloquent :)






                                          share|improve this answer













                                          To add a few more useful words:



                                          • Grandiloquent: Pompous or extravagant in language, style, or manner, especially in a way that is intended to impress.


                                          • Magniloquent: Using high-flown or bombastic language.


                                          Definitons are from Oxford English. (These definitions also indicate pompous, extravagant, high-flown & bombastic as useful words.) I appreciate the irony that these words are themselves grandiloquent :)







                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered May 4 at 21:32









                                          bewilderex63bewilderex63

                                          211




                                          211





















                                              2














                                              Most of the answers above involve such uncommon words as to be self-referential. A more common idiom only mentioned in @Canadian_Yankee's comment would be any of [using a]




                                              twenty-five cent word
                                              five-dollar word
                                              ten-dollar word



                                              [There's been a bit of inflation over the years. My dialect still uses the middle one.]



                                              They all have the same sense:




                                              A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated







                                              share|improve this answer



























                                                2














                                                Most of the answers above involve such uncommon words as to be self-referential. A more common idiom only mentioned in @Canadian_Yankee's comment would be any of [using a]




                                                twenty-five cent word
                                                five-dollar word
                                                ten-dollar word



                                                [There's been a bit of inflation over the years. My dialect still uses the middle one.]



                                                They all have the same sense:




                                                A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated







                                                share|improve this answer

























                                                  2












                                                  2








                                                  2







                                                  Most of the answers above involve such uncommon words as to be self-referential. A more common idiom only mentioned in @Canadian_Yankee's comment would be any of [using a]




                                                  twenty-five cent word
                                                  five-dollar word
                                                  ten-dollar word



                                                  [There's been a bit of inflation over the years. My dialect still uses the middle one.]



                                                  They all have the same sense:




                                                  A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated







                                                  share|improve this answer













                                                  Most of the answers above involve such uncommon words as to be self-referential. A more common idiom only mentioned in @Canadian_Yankee's comment would be any of [using a]




                                                  twenty-five cent word
                                                  five-dollar word
                                                  ten-dollar word



                                                  [There's been a bit of inflation over the years. My dialect still uses the middle one.]



                                                  They all have the same sense:




                                                  A long and uncommon word used in place of a shorter and simpler one with the intent to appear sophisticated








                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                  answered May 5 at 15:58









                                                  llylly

                                                  4,32511022




                                                  4,32511022





















                                                      2














                                                      An answer has already been accepted, but I think a reasonable alternative that comes to mind is




                                                      jargon, which usually implies unnecessarily complex language, usually specific to a certain field.




                                                      Using the more complex word outside of that field is almost always unjustified.






                                                      share|improve this answer





























                                                        2














                                                        An answer has already been accepted, but I think a reasonable alternative that comes to mind is




                                                        jargon, which usually implies unnecessarily complex language, usually specific to a certain field.




                                                        Using the more complex word outside of that field is almost always unjustified.






                                                        share|improve this answer



























                                                          2












                                                          2








                                                          2







                                                          An answer has already been accepted, but I think a reasonable alternative that comes to mind is




                                                          jargon, which usually implies unnecessarily complex language, usually specific to a certain field.




                                                          Using the more complex word outside of that field is almost always unjustified.






                                                          share|improve this answer















                                                          An answer has already been accepted, but I think a reasonable alternative that comes to mind is




                                                          jargon, which usually implies unnecessarily complex language, usually specific to a certain field.




                                                          Using the more complex word outside of that field is almost always unjustified.







                                                          share|improve this answer














                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                          share|improve this answer








                                                          edited May 5 at 20:12









                                                          J.R.

                                                          101k8129250




                                                          101k8129250










                                                          answered May 4 at 18:40









                                                          Brandon_JBrandon_J

                                                          1213




                                                          1213



























                                                              draft saved

                                                              draft discarded
















































                                                              Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid


                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded














                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                              function ()
                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209123%2fis-there-a-word-that-describes-the-unjustified-use-of-a-more-complex-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                              );

                                                              Post as a guest















                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Popular posts from this blog

                                                              Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                                                              Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                                                              Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020