Is my homebrew Awakened Bear race balanced?How do I evaluate whether my homebrew race is balanced?Can PCs swim in D&D 5e?Is this werewolf homebrew race balanced?Compared to the other PHB races, where does Mousemen homebrew race stand, in terms of balance?Is this “Powertouched” Homebrew Race Balanced?Is my D&D 5e Homebrew Necrolyte Race Balanced?Is my Florith Homebrew Race Balanced?Is this homebrew Awakened Monkey race balanced?Is this homebrew 'Outsider' race balanced?Is my homebrew “Created Human” race balanced?Is this homebrew race with a day/night-dependent racial trait balanced?

Can an old DSLR be upgraded to match modern smartphone image quality

Why don't I have ground wiring on any of my outlets?

Slide Partition from Rowstore to Columnstore

How much current can Baofeng UV-5R provide on +V pin?

Creating Fictional Slavic Place Names

Estimate related to the Möbius function

Looking for an old image of designing a cpu with plan laid out / being edited on a literal floor

What's the most polite way to tell a manager "shut up and let me work"?

Bringing Food from Hometown for Out-of-Town Interview?

Modern approach to radio buttons

Why is there a need to modify system call tables in Linux?

what's the equivalent of helper in LWC?

Have powerful mythological heroes ever run away or been deeply afraid?

Does Peach's float negate shorthop knockback multipliers?

How crucial is a waifu game storyline?

Why is Colorado so different politically from nearby states?

Humans meet a distant alien species. How do they standardize? - Units of Measure

Order by does not work as I expect

Are academic associations obliged to comply with the US government?

Is there a way to save this session?

What is the intuition behind uniform continuity?

Can a helicopter mask itself from Radar?

What is a simple, physical situation where complex numbers emerge naturally?

Infinitely many hats



Is my homebrew Awakened Bear race balanced?


How do I evaluate whether my homebrew race is balanced?Can PCs swim in D&D 5e?Is this werewolf homebrew race balanced?Compared to the other PHB races, where does Mousemen homebrew race stand, in terms of balance?Is this “Powertouched” Homebrew Race Balanced?Is my D&D 5e Homebrew Necrolyte Race Balanced?Is my Florith Homebrew Race Balanced?Is this homebrew Awakened Monkey race balanced?Is this homebrew 'Outsider' race balanced?Is my homebrew “Created Human” race balanced?Is this homebrew race with a day/night-dependent racial trait balanced?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








18












$begingroup$


I wanted to play an awakened bear, and decided to create my own race. I used JamesMusicus' Basic Race Feature Analysis sheet to create it, but I'd like to know how it would stack up in game. Is the unarmed strike a bit much?




Awakened Bear



Ability Score Increase. Your Strength score increases by 2 and your Constitution score increases by 1.



Age. Awakened bears, while intelligent, only live about 30 years. They tend to mature at about a year old.



Alignment. Awakened bears tend towards neutrality, though they can be fiercely loyal if they do choose a side.



Size. Awakened bears are 5-7 feet tall, and weigh 600-1000 lbs. Your size is Medium.



Speed. Your base walking speed is 30 feet. You have a swimming speed of 30 feet.



Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, or weapons with the light or finesse properties.



Darkvision. You can see in dim light within 60 feet of you as if it were bright light, and in darkness as if it were dim light. You can’t discern color in darkness, only shades of gray.



Thick Fur. You have resistance to cold damage.



Brave. You have advantage on saving throws against being frightened.



Languages. You can speak, read, and write Common.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Saltiquen please do not make revisions to your original question in response to received answers. Doing so invalidates those answers.
    $endgroup$
    – Pyrotechnical
    May 16 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Relevant mainsite question: How do I evaluate whether my homebrew race is balanced?. Relevant metas: How can I ask a good homebrew review question?, How should I ask about my D&D 5e Homebrew being balanced?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 16 at 22:03


















18












$begingroup$


I wanted to play an awakened bear, and decided to create my own race. I used JamesMusicus' Basic Race Feature Analysis sheet to create it, but I'd like to know how it would stack up in game. Is the unarmed strike a bit much?




Awakened Bear



Ability Score Increase. Your Strength score increases by 2 and your Constitution score increases by 1.



Age. Awakened bears, while intelligent, only live about 30 years. They tend to mature at about a year old.



Alignment. Awakened bears tend towards neutrality, though they can be fiercely loyal if they do choose a side.



Size. Awakened bears are 5-7 feet tall, and weigh 600-1000 lbs. Your size is Medium.



Speed. Your base walking speed is 30 feet. You have a swimming speed of 30 feet.



Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, or weapons with the light or finesse properties.



Darkvision. You can see in dim light within 60 feet of you as if it were bright light, and in darkness as if it were dim light. You can’t discern color in darkness, only shades of gray.



Thick Fur. You have resistance to cold damage.



Brave. You have advantage on saving throws against being frightened.



Languages. You can speak, read, and write Common.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Saltiquen please do not make revisions to your original question in response to received answers. Doing so invalidates those answers.
    $endgroup$
    – Pyrotechnical
    May 16 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Relevant mainsite question: How do I evaluate whether my homebrew race is balanced?. Relevant metas: How can I ask a good homebrew review question?, How should I ask about my D&D 5e Homebrew being balanced?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 16 at 22:03














18












18








18





$begingroup$


I wanted to play an awakened bear, and decided to create my own race. I used JamesMusicus' Basic Race Feature Analysis sheet to create it, but I'd like to know how it would stack up in game. Is the unarmed strike a bit much?




Awakened Bear



Ability Score Increase. Your Strength score increases by 2 and your Constitution score increases by 1.



Age. Awakened bears, while intelligent, only live about 30 years. They tend to mature at about a year old.



Alignment. Awakened bears tend towards neutrality, though they can be fiercely loyal if they do choose a side.



Size. Awakened bears are 5-7 feet tall, and weigh 600-1000 lbs. Your size is Medium.



Speed. Your base walking speed is 30 feet. You have a swimming speed of 30 feet.



Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, or weapons with the light or finesse properties.



Darkvision. You can see in dim light within 60 feet of you as if it were bright light, and in darkness as if it were dim light. You can’t discern color in darkness, only shades of gray.



Thick Fur. You have resistance to cold damage.



Brave. You have advantage on saving throws against being frightened.



Languages. You can speak, read, and write Common.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I wanted to play an awakened bear, and decided to create my own race. I used JamesMusicus' Basic Race Feature Analysis sheet to create it, but I'd like to know how it would stack up in game. Is the unarmed strike a bit much?




Awakened Bear



Ability Score Increase. Your Strength score increases by 2 and your Constitution score increases by 1.



Age. Awakened bears, while intelligent, only live about 30 years. They tend to mature at about a year old.



Alignment. Awakened bears tend towards neutrality, though they can be fiercely loyal if they do choose a side.



Size. Awakened bears are 5-7 feet tall, and weigh 600-1000 lbs. Your size is Medium.



Speed. Your base walking speed is 30 feet. You have a swimming speed of 30 feet.



Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, or weapons with the light or finesse properties.



Darkvision. You can see in dim light within 60 feet of you as if it were bright light, and in darkness as if it were dim light. You can’t discern color in darkness, only shades of gray.



Thick Fur. You have resistance to cold damage.



Brave. You have advantage on saving throws against being frightened.



Languages. You can speak, read, and write Common.








dnd-5e homebrew balance races






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 16 at 22:03









V2Blast

29.8k5108181




29.8k5108181










asked May 16 at 19:49









SaltiquenSaltiquen

915




915







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Saltiquen please do not make revisions to your original question in response to received answers. Doing so invalidates those answers.
    $endgroup$
    – Pyrotechnical
    May 16 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Relevant mainsite question: How do I evaluate whether my homebrew race is balanced?. Relevant metas: How can I ask a good homebrew review question?, How should I ask about my D&D 5e Homebrew being balanced?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 16 at 22:03













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Saltiquen please do not make revisions to your original question in response to received answers. Doing so invalidates those answers.
    $endgroup$
    – Pyrotechnical
    May 16 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Relevant mainsite question: How do I evaluate whether my homebrew race is balanced?. Relevant metas: How can I ask a good homebrew review question?, How should I ask about my D&D 5e Homebrew being balanced?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 16 at 22:03








2




2




$begingroup$
@Saltiquen please do not make revisions to your original question in response to received answers. Doing so invalidates those answers.
$endgroup$
– Pyrotechnical
May 16 at 20:34




$begingroup$
@Saltiquen please do not make revisions to your original question in response to received answers. Doing so invalidates those answers.
$endgroup$
– Pyrotechnical
May 16 at 20:34












$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Relevant mainsite question: How do I evaluate whether my homebrew race is balanced?. Relevant metas: How can I ask a good homebrew review question?, How should I ask about my D&D 5e Homebrew being balanced?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 16 at 22:03





$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Relevant mainsite question: How do I evaluate whether my homebrew race is balanced?. Relevant metas: How can I ask a good homebrew review question?, How should I ask about my D&D 5e Homebrew being balanced?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 16 at 22:03











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















19












$begingroup$

Overall, Looks Good!



Almost all of these abilities have a precedent. Damage resistance is shared by dragonborn. Proficiency in what is essentially a two handed weapon does not currently exist RAW -Dwarves and Elves are only proficient in 1 handed weapons- but I don't think this is a big deal. Any class that isn't proficient in a two handed weapon probably doesn't want to use one anyway.



Rebalancing of Bear Paws




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws
deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing
damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools,
musical instruments, light weapons or finnese weapons.




I agree with Dan B that it would be helpful to parse these out for the sake of readability. I also agree that it's important to prevent the claws from being used as monk weapons. That said, you don't want to remove all flavor: if you bump the bite damage down to 1d6+Str, it will be the same as the Lizardfolk's Bite ability, which is a natural weapon that can be used for monk abilities.



It might also be good to note that these are both "natural weapons" in order to better ground them in the system.



I don't think there's any need to state how many attacks you can make with these weapons per round. None of the natural weapon abilities of RAW classes do this. No weapon description does this. Your claws are weapons, natural weapons - the rules already provide ample guidance on how weapons can be used.



Finally, it is vitally important that you specify that a claw attack requires use of both paws - otherwise, your class could use a shield in one hand and a 2d6 weapon in the other.



Smaller Concerns



The swim speed is perhaps too high, not just from a narrative perspective (a bear that can swim as fast as it can run?) but also because it is the same as the Triton swim speed, and it's probably preferable to not steal the aquatic stage from the fish people race.



From a narrative perspective, I'm curious how the bear can use any weapons at all, but that might be too strong a debuff.



In line with other spellcaster-created creatures from the MM, you might change language from "Common" to "One language known by its creator". Also, maybe "You can speak, read, and with great difficulty write in one language of your creator." would be more appropriate given the trouble using tools?






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Polar bears can swim at 10km/h (6mph) and run at 40 km/h (25 mph). Other bears run faster and swim slower. Because general rules allows swimming with half of the walking speed already, it would be consistent with real world not to give bear a swim speed at all.i
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    May 17 at 8:40






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Land mammals don't have blubber, that refers specifically to something sea mammals have.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Kevinson
    May 17 at 18:21


















11












$begingroup$

This ability:




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons or finnese weapons.




is unclear. Can you attack with both claws and teeth in the same action? If you're a fighter and you have Extra Attack, does that give both an extra claws attack and a teeth attack, or what?



If the ability lets you make two high-damage attacks for one action, then it is much too good.



Also, if the ability counts as an "unarmed strike" for purposes of monk attacks, then it is too good.



I recommend clarifying it by splitting it into two abilities:




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws, and if both your hands are free then can attack with them as a weapon. This is not an unarmed strike for purposes of monk attacks. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons or finesse weapons.



Bear Teeth. You have proficiency with your bite and you can attack with it as a weapon. This is not an unarmed strike for purposes of monk attacks. Your bite deals 1d8+Str piercing damage.




The "bear paws" ability is now perfectly reasonable since it's the same as holding a greatsword. The "bear teeth" thing is a little bit exploitable since it lets you make melee attacks while both your hands are full. (eg, you could have a longbow in your hands and still threaten attacks in melee) But racial features are supposed to be a little bit good, and it's unlikely to matter for a class that's focused in strength and probably can make melee attacks anyway.




Aside from that, I think what you have is reasonable.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3206/… what makes you think that the rest is reasonable? I think it is generally a good answer, and I would like to vote it up, but I don't see how you back up that evaluation.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 9:29



















6












$begingroup$

Awakened Bears are balanced, but there are a few things to consider.



Using the Detect Balance: a 5e Homebrew Race Guide spreadsheet and my experience in the judgement of homebrew races, I'm evaluating as follows:



Ability Score Increase: ASI+3, +12 points.



Movement: 30 ft Swim Speed, +2 points.



Bear Paws: Natrual weapons 2d6, +5 points.



Bear Teeth: Natrual weapon 1d8, +3 points.



Darkvision: 60 ft Darkvision, +3 points.



Thick Fur: Cold resistance, +3 points.



Brave: Advantage on a rare roll, +1 point.




Things to consider:



What type of creature is the Awakened Bear?



If a type other than humanoid, then + 2 points. If humanoid, then -1 point.



Clumsy Bear Paws.




You can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons
or finnese weapons.




This is most likely an inconsequential disadvantage at its worst it is - 2 points for the weapon use inability and -2 points for the sometimes useful Artisan tools; and -1 point for musical instrument ribbon; up to - 4 points (a frequently useful feature) for a Bard whose musical instruments can be used as a spellcasting focus (PHB 53, PHB 203).



Most likely those disadvantages will never come to play when you play an Awakened Bear consequentially I would rate them as a -1 point ribbon in most cases.



Age: Thirty years is a rather short lifespan, but mechanically inconsequential.



Bear Paws: Should be reworded to: using both of your claws




Conclusion:



The Awakened Bear amounts to 21-28 points, (or at its absolute worst 18 points, when played as a Bard), while the low side is very conditional and the high end represents a robust score.



The Detect Balance: a 5e Homebrew Race Guide recommends 24-27 points which are easily achieved if it has the humanoid sub-type. Otherwise, it is at the strong side of races, about the power-level of a Wood Elf which is still in the reasonable frame of 20-30 points.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What an interesting resource. Hadn't thought about the bard issue. A bear should at least be able to use percussion instruments!
    $endgroup$
    – Pink Sweetener
    May 16 at 23:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PinkSweetener Bears cannot retract their claws, but maybe some magic could fix that? I believe they could play string instruments if the strings were of the correct material.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 8:40










  • $begingroup$
    @PinkSweetener the detect Balance sheet is much more granular as a tool than what JM offers and the interactivity is a boon. JM often gives the same 0.5 to strong race traits like Mask of the Wild that JM gives to ribbons like Tool Proficiency.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 8:49











  • $begingroup$
    Tool proficiency is a tough one though - really depends on the table. In my own game, tool proficiency has allowed my players to avoid some pretty serious hazards. Are bear claws very sharp? I'm imagining a grizzly tapping away on a bongo, bell, or steel drums with a slightly dulled nail. Might have to crosspost this to a different SE :P
    $endgroup$
    – Pink Sweetener
    May 18 at 18:29


















-2












$begingroup$

As currently phrased, I think the Bear Paws trait is slightly underpowered, except in one very important circumstance.



The claws should obviously be compared to wielding a greatsword. Since you don't say otherwise, you would only be able to make one attack with this feature per attack action, unless you have Extra Attack, just like a greatsword. Natural weapons don't count as unarmed strikes unless a feature says they do, so they wouldn't work for a monk, just like a greatsword. They're not weapons held in hands, so they don't interact with two weapon fighting, with or without the related feat, just like a greatsword.



It's underpowered because it doesn't interact with the dueling or great weapon fighting styles of the fighter or paladin classes, and comes with all those restrictions.



However, it does work with a shield. So, for a barbarian that doesn't have to worry about the fighting styles, you're essentially adding 2 to AC. I think this is a problem. My solution would be to change it so that you can attack with both claws as a single attack that deals 2d6 damage. This means that if you're wearing a shield, you can't use that attack. You may even add wording that makes it work with the great weapon fighting style.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nothing in the race prevents them from wielding a greatsword. They don't need their natural weapons to interact with weapon feats. The shield point is valid but that tends to make them overpowered not under.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    May 17 at 1:32











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148183%2fis-my-homebrew-awakened-bear-race-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









19












$begingroup$

Overall, Looks Good!



Almost all of these abilities have a precedent. Damage resistance is shared by dragonborn. Proficiency in what is essentially a two handed weapon does not currently exist RAW -Dwarves and Elves are only proficient in 1 handed weapons- but I don't think this is a big deal. Any class that isn't proficient in a two handed weapon probably doesn't want to use one anyway.



Rebalancing of Bear Paws




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws
deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing
damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools,
musical instruments, light weapons or finnese weapons.




I agree with Dan B that it would be helpful to parse these out for the sake of readability. I also agree that it's important to prevent the claws from being used as monk weapons. That said, you don't want to remove all flavor: if you bump the bite damage down to 1d6+Str, it will be the same as the Lizardfolk's Bite ability, which is a natural weapon that can be used for monk abilities.



It might also be good to note that these are both "natural weapons" in order to better ground them in the system.



I don't think there's any need to state how many attacks you can make with these weapons per round. None of the natural weapon abilities of RAW classes do this. No weapon description does this. Your claws are weapons, natural weapons - the rules already provide ample guidance on how weapons can be used.



Finally, it is vitally important that you specify that a claw attack requires use of both paws - otherwise, your class could use a shield in one hand and a 2d6 weapon in the other.



Smaller Concerns



The swim speed is perhaps too high, not just from a narrative perspective (a bear that can swim as fast as it can run?) but also because it is the same as the Triton swim speed, and it's probably preferable to not steal the aquatic stage from the fish people race.



From a narrative perspective, I'm curious how the bear can use any weapons at all, but that might be too strong a debuff.



In line with other spellcaster-created creatures from the MM, you might change language from "Common" to "One language known by its creator". Also, maybe "You can speak, read, and with great difficulty write in one language of your creator." would be more appropriate given the trouble using tools?






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Polar bears can swim at 10km/h (6mph) and run at 40 km/h (25 mph). Other bears run faster and swim slower. Because general rules allows swimming with half of the walking speed already, it would be consistent with real world not to give bear a swim speed at all.i
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    May 17 at 8:40






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Land mammals don't have blubber, that refers specifically to something sea mammals have.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Kevinson
    May 17 at 18:21















19












$begingroup$

Overall, Looks Good!



Almost all of these abilities have a precedent. Damage resistance is shared by dragonborn. Proficiency in what is essentially a two handed weapon does not currently exist RAW -Dwarves and Elves are only proficient in 1 handed weapons- but I don't think this is a big deal. Any class that isn't proficient in a two handed weapon probably doesn't want to use one anyway.



Rebalancing of Bear Paws




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws
deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing
damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools,
musical instruments, light weapons or finnese weapons.




I agree with Dan B that it would be helpful to parse these out for the sake of readability. I also agree that it's important to prevent the claws from being used as monk weapons. That said, you don't want to remove all flavor: if you bump the bite damage down to 1d6+Str, it will be the same as the Lizardfolk's Bite ability, which is a natural weapon that can be used for monk abilities.



It might also be good to note that these are both "natural weapons" in order to better ground them in the system.



I don't think there's any need to state how many attacks you can make with these weapons per round. None of the natural weapon abilities of RAW classes do this. No weapon description does this. Your claws are weapons, natural weapons - the rules already provide ample guidance on how weapons can be used.



Finally, it is vitally important that you specify that a claw attack requires use of both paws - otherwise, your class could use a shield in one hand and a 2d6 weapon in the other.



Smaller Concerns



The swim speed is perhaps too high, not just from a narrative perspective (a bear that can swim as fast as it can run?) but also because it is the same as the Triton swim speed, and it's probably preferable to not steal the aquatic stage from the fish people race.



From a narrative perspective, I'm curious how the bear can use any weapons at all, but that might be too strong a debuff.



In line with other spellcaster-created creatures from the MM, you might change language from "Common" to "One language known by its creator". Also, maybe "You can speak, read, and with great difficulty write in one language of your creator." would be more appropriate given the trouble using tools?






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Polar bears can swim at 10km/h (6mph) and run at 40 km/h (25 mph). Other bears run faster and swim slower. Because general rules allows swimming with half of the walking speed already, it would be consistent with real world not to give bear a swim speed at all.i
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    May 17 at 8:40






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Land mammals don't have blubber, that refers specifically to something sea mammals have.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Kevinson
    May 17 at 18:21













19












19








19





$begingroup$

Overall, Looks Good!



Almost all of these abilities have a precedent. Damage resistance is shared by dragonborn. Proficiency in what is essentially a two handed weapon does not currently exist RAW -Dwarves and Elves are only proficient in 1 handed weapons- but I don't think this is a big deal. Any class that isn't proficient in a two handed weapon probably doesn't want to use one anyway.



Rebalancing of Bear Paws




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws
deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing
damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools,
musical instruments, light weapons or finnese weapons.




I agree with Dan B that it would be helpful to parse these out for the sake of readability. I also agree that it's important to prevent the claws from being used as monk weapons. That said, you don't want to remove all flavor: if you bump the bite damage down to 1d6+Str, it will be the same as the Lizardfolk's Bite ability, which is a natural weapon that can be used for monk abilities.



It might also be good to note that these are both "natural weapons" in order to better ground them in the system.



I don't think there's any need to state how many attacks you can make with these weapons per round. None of the natural weapon abilities of RAW classes do this. No weapon description does this. Your claws are weapons, natural weapons - the rules already provide ample guidance on how weapons can be used.



Finally, it is vitally important that you specify that a claw attack requires use of both paws - otherwise, your class could use a shield in one hand and a 2d6 weapon in the other.



Smaller Concerns



The swim speed is perhaps too high, not just from a narrative perspective (a bear that can swim as fast as it can run?) but also because it is the same as the Triton swim speed, and it's probably preferable to not steal the aquatic stage from the fish people race.



From a narrative perspective, I'm curious how the bear can use any weapons at all, but that might be too strong a debuff.



In line with other spellcaster-created creatures from the MM, you might change language from "Common" to "One language known by its creator". Also, maybe "You can speak, read, and with great difficulty write in one language of your creator." would be more appropriate given the trouble using tools?






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Overall, Looks Good!



Almost all of these abilities have a precedent. Damage resistance is shared by dragonborn. Proficiency in what is essentially a two handed weapon does not currently exist RAW -Dwarves and Elves are only proficient in 1 handed weapons- but I don't think this is a big deal. Any class that isn't proficient in a two handed weapon probably doesn't want to use one anyway.



Rebalancing of Bear Paws




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws
deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing
damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools,
musical instruments, light weapons or finnese weapons.




I agree with Dan B that it would be helpful to parse these out for the sake of readability. I also agree that it's important to prevent the claws from being used as monk weapons. That said, you don't want to remove all flavor: if you bump the bite damage down to 1d6+Str, it will be the same as the Lizardfolk's Bite ability, which is a natural weapon that can be used for monk abilities.



It might also be good to note that these are both "natural weapons" in order to better ground them in the system.



I don't think there's any need to state how many attacks you can make with these weapons per round. None of the natural weapon abilities of RAW classes do this. No weapon description does this. Your claws are weapons, natural weapons - the rules already provide ample guidance on how weapons can be used.



Finally, it is vitally important that you specify that a claw attack requires use of both paws - otherwise, your class could use a shield in one hand and a 2d6 weapon in the other.



Smaller Concerns



The swim speed is perhaps too high, not just from a narrative perspective (a bear that can swim as fast as it can run?) but also because it is the same as the Triton swim speed, and it's probably preferable to not steal the aquatic stage from the fish people race.



From a narrative perspective, I'm curious how the bear can use any weapons at all, but that might be too strong a debuff.



In line with other spellcaster-created creatures from the MM, you might change language from "Common" to "One language known by its creator". Also, maybe "You can speak, read, and with great difficulty write in one language of your creator." would be more appropriate given the trouble using tools?







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 18 at 18:22

























answered May 16 at 21:48









Pink SweetenerPink Sweetener

3,8961736




3,8961736







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Polar bears can swim at 10km/h (6mph) and run at 40 km/h (25 mph). Other bears run faster and swim slower. Because general rules allows swimming with half of the walking speed already, it would be consistent with real world not to give bear a swim speed at all.i
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    May 17 at 8:40






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Land mammals don't have blubber, that refers specifically to something sea mammals have.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Kevinson
    May 17 at 18:21












  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Polar bears can swim at 10km/h (6mph) and run at 40 km/h (25 mph). Other bears run faster and swim slower. Because general rules allows swimming with half of the walking speed already, it would be consistent with real world not to give bear a swim speed at all.i
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    May 17 at 8:40






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Land mammals don't have blubber, that refers specifically to something sea mammals have.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Kevinson
    May 17 at 18:21







8




8




$begingroup$
Polar bears can swim at 10km/h (6mph) and run at 40 km/h (25 mph). Other bears run faster and swim slower. Because general rules allows swimming with half of the walking speed already, it would be consistent with real world not to give bear a swim speed at all.i
$endgroup$
– Mołot
May 17 at 8:40




$begingroup$
Polar bears can swim at 10km/h (6mph) and run at 40 km/h (25 mph). Other bears run faster and swim slower. Because general rules allows swimming with half of the walking speed already, it would be consistent with real world not to give bear a swim speed at all.i
$endgroup$
– Mołot
May 17 at 8:40




2




2




$begingroup$
Land mammals don't have blubber, that refers specifically to something sea mammals have.
$endgroup$
– Carl Kevinson
May 17 at 18:21




$begingroup$
Land mammals don't have blubber, that refers specifically to something sea mammals have.
$endgroup$
– Carl Kevinson
May 17 at 18:21













11












$begingroup$

This ability:




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons or finnese weapons.




is unclear. Can you attack with both claws and teeth in the same action? If you're a fighter and you have Extra Attack, does that give both an extra claws attack and a teeth attack, or what?



If the ability lets you make two high-damage attacks for one action, then it is much too good.



Also, if the ability counts as an "unarmed strike" for purposes of monk attacks, then it is too good.



I recommend clarifying it by splitting it into two abilities:




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws, and if both your hands are free then can attack with them as a weapon. This is not an unarmed strike for purposes of monk attacks. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons or finesse weapons.



Bear Teeth. You have proficiency with your bite and you can attack with it as a weapon. This is not an unarmed strike for purposes of monk attacks. Your bite deals 1d8+Str piercing damage.




The "bear paws" ability is now perfectly reasonable since it's the same as holding a greatsword. The "bear teeth" thing is a little bit exploitable since it lets you make melee attacks while both your hands are full. (eg, you could have a longbow in your hands and still threaten attacks in melee) But racial features are supposed to be a little bit good, and it's unlikely to matter for a class that's focused in strength and probably can make melee attacks anyway.




Aside from that, I think what you have is reasonable.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3206/… what makes you think that the rest is reasonable? I think it is generally a good answer, and I would like to vote it up, but I don't see how you back up that evaluation.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 9:29
















11












$begingroup$

This ability:




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons or finnese weapons.




is unclear. Can you attack with both claws and teeth in the same action? If you're a fighter and you have Extra Attack, does that give both an extra claws attack and a teeth attack, or what?



If the ability lets you make two high-damage attacks for one action, then it is much too good.



Also, if the ability counts as an "unarmed strike" for purposes of monk attacks, then it is too good.



I recommend clarifying it by splitting it into two abilities:




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws, and if both your hands are free then can attack with them as a weapon. This is not an unarmed strike for purposes of monk attacks. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons or finesse weapons.



Bear Teeth. You have proficiency with your bite and you can attack with it as a weapon. This is not an unarmed strike for purposes of monk attacks. Your bite deals 1d8+Str piercing damage.




The "bear paws" ability is now perfectly reasonable since it's the same as holding a greatsword. The "bear teeth" thing is a little bit exploitable since it lets you make melee attacks while both your hands are full. (eg, you could have a longbow in your hands and still threaten attacks in melee) But racial features are supposed to be a little bit good, and it's unlikely to matter for a class that's focused in strength and probably can make melee attacks anyway.




Aside from that, I think what you have is reasonable.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3206/… what makes you think that the rest is reasonable? I think it is generally a good answer, and I would like to vote it up, but I don't see how you back up that evaluation.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 9:29














11












11








11





$begingroup$

This ability:




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons or finnese weapons.




is unclear. Can you attack with both claws and teeth in the same action? If you're a fighter and you have Extra Attack, does that give both an extra claws attack and a teeth attack, or what?



If the ability lets you make two high-damage attacks for one action, then it is much too good.



Also, if the ability counts as an "unarmed strike" for purposes of monk attacks, then it is too good.



I recommend clarifying it by splitting it into two abilities:




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws, and if both your hands are free then can attack with them as a weapon. This is not an unarmed strike for purposes of monk attacks. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons or finesse weapons.



Bear Teeth. You have proficiency with your bite and you can attack with it as a weapon. This is not an unarmed strike for purposes of monk attacks. Your bite deals 1d8+Str piercing damage.




The "bear paws" ability is now perfectly reasonable since it's the same as holding a greatsword. The "bear teeth" thing is a little bit exploitable since it lets you make melee attacks while both your hands are full. (eg, you could have a longbow in your hands and still threaten attacks in melee) But racial features are supposed to be a little bit good, and it's unlikely to matter for a class that's focused in strength and probably can make melee attacks anyway.




Aside from that, I think what you have is reasonable.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



This ability:




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws and teeth. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage and your teeth deal 1d8+Str piercing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons or finnese weapons.




is unclear. Can you attack with both claws and teeth in the same action? If you're a fighter and you have Extra Attack, does that give both an extra claws attack and a teeth attack, or what?



If the ability lets you make two high-damage attacks for one action, then it is much too good.



Also, if the ability counts as an "unarmed strike" for purposes of monk attacks, then it is too good.



I recommend clarifying it by splitting it into two abilities:




Bear Paws. You have proficiency with your claws, and if both your hands are free then can attack with them as a weapon. This is not an unarmed strike for purposes of monk attacks. Your claws deal 2d6+Str slashing damage. Due to your clumsy paws, you can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons or finesse weapons.



Bear Teeth. You have proficiency with your bite and you can attack with it as a weapon. This is not an unarmed strike for purposes of monk attacks. Your bite deals 1d8+Str piercing damage.




The "bear paws" ability is now perfectly reasonable since it's the same as holding a greatsword. The "bear teeth" thing is a little bit exploitable since it lets you make melee attacks while both your hands are full. (eg, you could have a longbow in your hands and still threaten attacks in melee) But racial features are supposed to be a little bit good, and it's unlikely to matter for a class that's focused in strength and probably can make melee attacks anyway.




Aside from that, I think what you have is reasonable.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 16 at 20:34

























answered May 16 at 20:26









Dan BDan B

40.7k981155




40.7k981155







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3206/… what makes you think that the rest is reasonable? I think it is generally a good answer, and I would like to vote it up, but I don't see how you back up that evaluation.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 9:29













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3206/… what makes you think that the rest is reasonable? I think it is generally a good answer, and I would like to vote it up, but I don't see how you back up that evaluation.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 9:29








1




1




$begingroup$
rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3206/… what makes you think that the rest is reasonable? I think it is generally a good answer, and I would like to vote it up, but I don't see how you back up that evaluation.
$endgroup$
– Akixkisu
May 17 at 9:29





$begingroup$
rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3206/… what makes you think that the rest is reasonable? I think it is generally a good answer, and I would like to vote it up, but I don't see how you back up that evaluation.
$endgroup$
– Akixkisu
May 17 at 9:29












6












$begingroup$

Awakened Bears are balanced, but there are a few things to consider.



Using the Detect Balance: a 5e Homebrew Race Guide spreadsheet and my experience in the judgement of homebrew races, I'm evaluating as follows:



Ability Score Increase: ASI+3, +12 points.



Movement: 30 ft Swim Speed, +2 points.



Bear Paws: Natrual weapons 2d6, +5 points.



Bear Teeth: Natrual weapon 1d8, +3 points.



Darkvision: 60 ft Darkvision, +3 points.



Thick Fur: Cold resistance, +3 points.



Brave: Advantage on a rare roll, +1 point.




Things to consider:



What type of creature is the Awakened Bear?



If a type other than humanoid, then + 2 points. If humanoid, then -1 point.



Clumsy Bear Paws.




You can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons
or finnese weapons.




This is most likely an inconsequential disadvantage at its worst it is - 2 points for the weapon use inability and -2 points for the sometimes useful Artisan tools; and -1 point for musical instrument ribbon; up to - 4 points (a frequently useful feature) for a Bard whose musical instruments can be used as a spellcasting focus (PHB 53, PHB 203).



Most likely those disadvantages will never come to play when you play an Awakened Bear consequentially I would rate them as a -1 point ribbon in most cases.



Age: Thirty years is a rather short lifespan, but mechanically inconsequential.



Bear Paws: Should be reworded to: using both of your claws




Conclusion:



The Awakened Bear amounts to 21-28 points, (or at its absolute worst 18 points, when played as a Bard), while the low side is very conditional and the high end represents a robust score.



The Detect Balance: a 5e Homebrew Race Guide recommends 24-27 points which are easily achieved if it has the humanoid sub-type. Otherwise, it is at the strong side of races, about the power-level of a Wood Elf which is still in the reasonable frame of 20-30 points.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What an interesting resource. Hadn't thought about the bard issue. A bear should at least be able to use percussion instruments!
    $endgroup$
    – Pink Sweetener
    May 16 at 23:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PinkSweetener Bears cannot retract their claws, but maybe some magic could fix that? I believe they could play string instruments if the strings were of the correct material.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 8:40










  • $begingroup$
    @PinkSweetener the detect Balance sheet is much more granular as a tool than what JM offers and the interactivity is a boon. JM often gives the same 0.5 to strong race traits like Mask of the Wild that JM gives to ribbons like Tool Proficiency.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 8:49











  • $begingroup$
    Tool proficiency is a tough one though - really depends on the table. In my own game, tool proficiency has allowed my players to avoid some pretty serious hazards. Are bear claws very sharp? I'm imagining a grizzly tapping away on a bongo, bell, or steel drums with a slightly dulled nail. Might have to crosspost this to a different SE :P
    $endgroup$
    – Pink Sweetener
    May 18 at 18:29















6












$begingroup$

Awakened Bears are balanced, but there are a few things to consider.



Using the Detect Balance: a 5e Homebrew Race Guide spreadsheet and my experience in the judgement of homebrew races, I'm evaluating as follows:



Ability Score Increase: ASI+3, +12 points.



Movement: 30 ft Swim Speed, +2 points.



Bear Paws: Natrual weapons 2d6, +5 points.



Bear Teeth: Natrual weapon 1d8, +3 points.



Darkvision: 60 ft Darkvision, +3 points.



Thick Fur: Cold resistance, +3 points.



Brave: Advantage on a rare roll, +1 point.




Things to consider:



What type of creature is the Awakened Bear?



If a type other than humanoid, then + 2 points. If humanoid, then -1 point.



Clumsy Bear Paws.




You can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons
or finnese weapons.




This is most likely an inconsequential disadvantage at its worst it is - 2 points for the weapon use inability and -2 points for the sometimes useful Artisan tools; and -1 point for musical instrument ribbon; up to - 4 points (a frequently useful feature) for a Bard whose musical instruments can be used as a spellcasting focus (PHB 53, PHB 203).



Most likely those disadvantages will never come to play when you play an Awakened Bear consequentially I would rate them as a -1 point ribbon in most cases.



Age: Thirty years is a rather short lifespan, but mechanically inconsequential.



Bear Paws: Should be reworded to: using both of your claws




Conclusion:



The Awakened Bear amounts to 21-28 points, (or at its absolute worst 18 points, when played as a Bard), while the low side is very conditional and the high end represents a robust score.



The Detect Balance: a 5e Homebrew Race Guide recommends 24-27 points which are easily achieved if it has the humanoid sub-type. Otherwise, it is at the strong side of races, about the power-level of a Wood Elf which is still in the reasonable frame of 20-30 points.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What an interesting resource. Hadn't thought about the bard issue. A bear should at least be able to use percussion instruments!
    $endgroup$
    – Pink Sweetener
    May 16 at 23:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PinkSweetener Bears cannot retract their claws, but maybe some magic could fix that? I believe they could play string instruments if the strings were of the correct material.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 8:40










  • $begingroup$
    @PinkSweetener the detect Balance sheet is much more granular as a tool than what JM offers and the interactivity is a boon. JM often gives the same 0.5 to strong race traits like Mask of the Wild that JM gives to ribbons like Tool Proficiency.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 8:49











  • $begingroup$
    Tool proficiency is a tough one though - really depends on the table. In my own game, tool proficiency has allowed my players to avoid some pretty serious hazards. Are bear claws very sharp? I'm imagining a grizzly tapping away on a bongo, bell, or steel drums with a slightly dulled nail. Might have to crosspost this to a different SE :P
    $endgroup$
    – Pink Sweetener
    May 18 at 18:29













6












6








6





$begingroup$

Awakened Bears are balanced, but there are a few things to consider.



Using the Detect Balance: a 5e Homebrew Race Guide spreadsheet and my experience in the judgement of homebrew races, I'm evaluating as follows:



Ability Score Increase: ASI+3, +12 points.



Movement: 30 ft Swim Speed, +2 points.



Bear Paws: Natrual weapons 2d6, +5 points.



Bear Teeth: Natrual weapon 1d8, +3 points.



Darkvision: 60 ft Darkvision, +3 points.



Thick Fur: Cold resistance, +3 points.



Brave: Advantage on a rare roll, +1 point.




Things to consider:



What type of creature is the Awakened Bear?



If a type other than humanoid, then + 2 points. If humanoid, then -1 point.



Clumsy Bear Paws.




You can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons
or finnese weapons.




This is most likely an inconsequential disadvantage at its worst it is - 2 points for the weapon use inability and -2 points for the sometimes useful Artisan tools; and -1 point for musical instrument ribbon; up to - 4 points (a frequently useful feature) for a Bard whose musical instruments can be used as a spellcasting focus (PHB 53, PHB 203).



Most likely those disadvantages will never come to play when you play an Awakened Bear consequentially I would rate them as a -1 point ribbon in most cases.



Age: Thirty years is a rather short lifespan, but mechanically inconsequential.



Bear Paws: Should be reworded to: using both of your claws




Conclusion:



The Awakened Bear amounts to 21-28 points, (or at its absolute worst 18 points, when played as a Bard), while the low side is very conditional and the high end represents a robust score.



The Detect Balance: a 5e Homebrew Race Guide recommends 24-27 points which are easily achieved if it has the humanoid sub-type. Otherwise, it is at the strong side of races, about the power-level of a Wood Elf which is still in the reasonable frame of 20-30 points.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Awakened Bears are balanced, but there are a few things to consider.



Using the Detect Balance: a 5e Homebrew Race Guide spreadsheet and my experience in the judgement of homebrew races, I'm evaluating as follows:



Ability Score Increase: ASI+3, +12 points.



Movement: 30 ft Swim Speed, +2 points.



Bear Paws: Natrual weapons 2d6, +5 points.



Bear Teeth: Natrual weapon 1d8, +3 points.



Darkvision: 60 ft Darkvision, +3 points.



Thick Fur: Cold resistance, +3 points.



Brave: Advantage on a rare roll, +1 point.




Things to consider:



What type of creature is the Awakened Bear?



If a type other than humanoid, then + 2 points. If humanoid, then -1 point.



Clumsy Bear Paws.




You can’t use any artisan's tools, musical instruments, light weapons
or finnese weapons.




This is most likely an inconsequential disadvantage at its worst it is - 2 points for the weapon use inability and -2 points for the sometimes useful Artisan tools; and -1 point for musical instrument ribbon; up to - 4 points (a frequently useful feature) for a Bard whose musical instruments can be used as a spellcasting focus (PHB 53, PHB 203).



Most likely those disadvantages will never come to play when you play an Awakened Bear consequentially I would rate them as a -1 point ribbon in most cases.



Age: Thirty years is a rather short lifespan, but mechanically inconsequential.



Bear Paws: Should be reworded to: using both of your claws




Conclusion:



The Awakened Bear amounts to 21-28 points, (or at its absolute worst 18 points, when played as a Bard), while the low side is very conditional and the high end represents a robust score.



The Detect Balance: a 5e Homebrew Race Guide recommends 24-27 points which are easily achieved if it has the humanoid sub-type. Otherwise, it is at the strong side of races, about the power-level of a Wood Elf which is still in the reasonable frame of 20-30 points.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 17 at 9:29

























answered May 16 at 21:42









AkixkisuAkixkisu

2,873739




2,873739







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What an interesting resource. Hadn't thought about the bard issue. A bear should at least be able to use percussion instruments!
    $endgroup$
    – Pink Sweetener
    May 16 at 23:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PinkSweetener Bears cannot retract their claws, but maybe some magic could fix that? I believe they could play string instruments if the strings were of the correct material.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 8:40










  • $begingroup$
    @PinkSweetener the detect Balance sheet is much more granular as a tool than what JM offers and the interactivity is a boon. JM often gives the same 0.5 to strong race traits like Mask of the Wild that JM gives to ribbons like Tool Proficiency.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 8:49











  • $begingroup$
    Tool proficiency is a tough one though - really depends on the table. In my own game, tool proficiency has allowed my players to avoid some pretty serious hazards. Are bear claws very sharp? I'm imagining a grizzly tapping away on a bongo, bell, or steel drums with a slightly dulled nail. Might have to crosspost this to a different SE :P
    $endgroup$
    – Pink Sweetener
    May 18 at 18:29












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What an interesting resource. Hadn't thought about the bard issue. A bear should at least be able to use percussion instruments!
    $endgroup$
    – Pink Sweetener
    May 16 at 23:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PinkSweetener Bears cannot retract their claws, but maybe some magic could fix that? I believe they could play string instruments if the strings were of the correct material.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 8:40










  • $begingroup$
    @PinkSweetener the detect Balance sheet is much more granular as a tool than what JM offers and the interactivity is a boon. JM often gives the same 0.5 to strong race traits like Mask of the Wild that JM gives to ribbons like Tool Proficiency.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    May 17 at 8:49











  • $begingroup$
    Tool proficiency is a tough one though - really depends on the table. In my own game, tool proficiency has allowed my players to avoid some pretty serious hazards. Are bear claws very sharp? I'm imagining a grizzly tapping away on a bongo, bell, or steel drums with a slightly dulled nail. Might have to crosspost this to a different SE :P
    $endgroup$
    – Pink Sweetener
    May 18 at 18:29







1




1




$begingroup$
What an interesting resource. Hadn't thought about the bard issue. A bear should at least be able to use percussion instruments!
$endgroup$
– Pink Sweetener
May 16 at 23:59




$begingroup$
What an interesting resource. Hadn't thought about the bard issue. A bear should at least be able to use percussion instruments!
$endgroup$
– Pink Sweetener
May 16 at 23:59




1




1




$begingroup$
@PinkSweetener Bears cannot retract their claws, but maybe some magic could fix that? I believe they could play string instruments if the strings were of the correct material.
$endgroup$
– Akixkisu
May 17 at 8:40




$begingroup$
@PinkSweetener Bears cannot retract their claws, but maybe some magic could fix that? I believe they could play string instruments if the strings were of the correct material.
$endgroup$
– Akixkisu
May 17 at 8:40












$begingroup$
@PinkSweetener the detect Balance sheet is much more granular as a tool than what JM offers and the interactivity is a boon. JM often gives the same 0.5 to strong race traits like Mask of the Wild that JM gives to ribbons like Tool Proficiency.
$endgroup$
– Akixkisu
May 17 at 8:49





$begingroup$
@PinkSweetener the detect Balance sheet is much more granular as a tool than what JM offers and the interactivity is a boon. JM often gives the same 0.5 to strong race traits like Mask of the Wild that JM gives to ribbons like Tool Proficiency.
$endgroup$
– Akixkisu
May 17 at 8:49













$begingroup$
Tool proficiency is a tough one though - really depends on the table. In my own game, tool proficiency has allowed my players to avoid some pretty serious hazards. Are bear claws very sharp? I'm imagining a grizzly tapping away on a bongo, bell, or steel drums with a slightly dulled nail. Might have to crosspost this to a different SE :P
$endgroup$
– Pink Sweetener
May 18 at 18:29




$begingroup$
Tool proficiency is a tough one though - really depends on the table. In my own game, tool proficiency has allowed my players to avoid some pretty serious hazards. Are bear claws very sharp? I'm imagining a grizzly tapping away on a bongo, bell, or steel drums with a slightly dulled nail. Might have to crosspost this to a different SE :P
$endgroup$
– Pink Sweetener
May 18 at 18:29











-2












$begingroup$

As currently phrased, I think the Bear Paws trait is slightly underpowered, except in one very important circumstance.



The claws should obviously be compared to wielding a greatsword. Since you don't say otherwise, you would only be able to make one attack with this feature per attack action, unless you have Extra Attack, just like a greatsword. Natural weapons don't count as unarmed strikes unless a feature says they do, so they wouldn't work for a monk, just like a greatsword. They're not weapons held in hands, so they don't interact with two weapon fighting, with or without the related feat, just like a greatsword.



It's underpowered because it doesn't interact with the dueling or great weapon fighting styles of the fighter or paladin classes, and comes with all those restrictions.



However, it does work with a shield. So, for a barbarian that doesn't have to worry about the fighting styles, you're essentially adding 2 to AC. I think this is a problem. My solution would be to change it so that you can attack with both claws as a single attack that deals 2d6 damage. This means that if you're wearing a shield, you can't use that attack. You may even add wording that makes it work with the great weapon fighting style.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nothing in the race prevents them from wielding a greatsword. They don't need their natural weapons to interact with weapon feats. The shield point is valid but that tends to make them overpowered not under.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    May 17 at 1:32















-2












$begingroup$

As currently phrased, I think the Bear Paws trait is slightly underpowered, except in one very important circumstance.



The claws should obviously be compared to wielding a greatsword. Since you don't say otherwise, you would only be able to make one attack with this feature per attack action, unless you have Extra Attack, just like a greatsword. Natural weapons don't count as unarmed strikes unless a feature says they do, so they wouldn't work for a monk, just like a greatsword. They're not weapons held in hands, so they don't interact with two weapon fighting, with or without the related feat, just like a greatsword.



It's underpowered because it doesn't interact with the dueling or great weapon fighting styles of the fighter or paladin classes, and comes with all those restrictions.



However, it does work with a shield. So, for a barbarian that doesn't have to worry about the fighting styles, you're essentially adding 2 to AC. I think this is a problem. My solution would be to change it so that you can attack with both claws as a single attack that deals 2d6 damage. This means that if you're wearing a shield, you can't use that attack. You may even add wording that makes it work with the great weapon fighting style.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nothing in the race prevents them from wielding a greatsword. They don't need their natural weapons to interact with weapon feats. The shield point is valid but that tends to make them overpowered not under.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    May 17 at 1:32













-2












-2








-2





$begingroup$

As currently phrased, I think the Bear Paws trait is slightly underpowered, except in one very important circumstance.



The claws should obviously be compared to wielding a greatsword. Since you don't say otherwise, you would only be able to make one attack with this feature per attack action, unless you have Extra Attack, just like a greatsword. Natural weapons don't count as unarmed strikes unless a feature says they do, so they wouldn't work for a monk, just like a greatsword. They're not weapons held in hands, so they don't interact with two weapon fighting, with or without the related feat, just like a greatsword.



It's underpowered because it doesn't interact with the dueling or great weapon fighting styles of the fighter or paladin classes, and comes with all those restrictions.



However, it does work with a shield. So, for a barbarian that doesn't have to worry about the fighting styles, you're essentially adding 2 to AC. I think this is a problem. My solution would be to change it so that you can attack with both claws as a single attack that deals 2d6 damage. This means that if you're wearing a shield, you can't use that attack. You may even add wording that makes it work with the great weapon fighting style.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



As currently phrased, I think the Bear Paws trait is slightly underpowered, except in one very important circumstance.



The claws should obviously be compared to wielding a greatsword. Since you don't say otherwise, you would only be able to make one attack with this feature per attack action, unless you have Extra Attack, just like a greatsword. Natural weapons don't count as unarmed strikes unless a feature says they do, so they wouldn't work for a monk, just like a greatsword. They're not weapons held in hands, so they don't interact with two weapon fighting, with or without the related feat, just like a greatsword.



It's underpowered because it doesn't interact with the dueling or great weapon fighting styles of the fighter or paladin classes, and comes with all those restrictions.



However, it does work with a shield. So, for a barbarian that doesn't have to worry about the fighting styles, you're essentially adding 2 to AC. I think this is a problem. My solution would be to change it so that you can attack with both claws as a single attack that deals 2d6 damage. This means that if you're wearing a shield, you can't use that attack. You may even add wording that makes it work with the great weapon fighting style.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 16 at 21:22









Derek StuckiDerek Stucki

22.2k772113




22.2k772113







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nothing in the race prevents them from wielding a greatsword. They don't need their natural weapons to interact with weapon feats. The shield point is valid but that tends to make them overpowered not under.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    May 17 at 1:32












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nothing in the race prevents them from wielding a greatsword. They don't need their natural weapons to interact with weapon feats. The shield point is valid but that tends to make them overpowered not under.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    May 17 at 1:32







1




1




$begingroup$
Nothing in the race prevents them from wielding a greatsword. They don't need their natural weapons to interact with weapon feats. The shield point is valid but that tends to make them overpowered not under.
$endgroup$
– linksassin
May 17 at 1:32




$begingroup$
Nothing in the race prevents them from wielding a greatsword. They don't need their natural weapons to interact with weapon feats. The shield point is valid but that tends to make them overpowered not under.
$endgroup$
– linksassin
May 17 at 1:32

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148183%2fis-my-homebrew-awakened-bear-race-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company