What animals or plants were used to illustrate ideas of physics?Grassmann's “forms”Have the results from Computational Physics disprove any physics theory?What were Newton's six laws of motion?Conflict between physics and philosophyWhat were the criticisms against the introduction of “vector analysis”?How did artillery and physics co-evolve during 1400-1700?Who originated the biological senses of palindrome and pseudopalindrome?looking for specific book about renaissance physicsHistory of mesoscopic physicsEquivalence principle before Einstein
What is the right way to float a home lab?
Is there a rule that prohibits us from using 2 possessives in a row?
How should I push back against my job assigning "homework"?
If Sweden was to magically float away, at what altitude would it be visible from the southern hemisphere?
Why don't I have ground wiring on any of my outlets?
What does it mean by "d-ism of Leibniz" and "dotage of Newton" in simple English?
Looking for an old image of designing a cpu with plan laid out / being edited on a literal floor
Scala list with same adjacent values
If a massive object like Jupiter flew past the Earth how close would it need to come to pull people off of the surface?
The deliberate use of misleading terminology
What is a simple, physical situation where complex numbers emerge naturally?
How crucial is a waifu game storyline?
Why would Lupin kill Pettigrew?
Is the world in Game of Thrones spherical or flat?
Opposite of "Squeaky wheel gets the grease"
Why use water tanks from a retired Space Shuttle?
How do I set the Verbatim font (or the mono font) to bold by default?
How to properly maintain eye contact with people that have distinctive facial features?
How to detach yourself from a character you're going to kill?
Asking for something with different prices
Singlequote and backslash
California: "For quality assurance, this phone call is being recorded"
What does the behaviour of water on the skin of an aircraft in flight tell us?
Applicants clearly not having the skills they advertise
What animals or plants were used to illustrate ideas of physics?
Grassmann's “forms”Have the results from Computational Physics disprove any physics theory?What were Newton's six laws of motion?Conflict between physics and philosophyWhat were the criticisms against the introduction of “vector analysis”?How did artillery and physics co-evolve during 1400-1700?Who originated the biological senses of palindrome and pseudopalindrome?looking for specific book about renaissance physicsHistory of mesoscopic physicsEquivalence principle before Einstein
$begingroup$
This crossed my mind today...
There is Schrödinger's cat and Newton's apple.
Are there any other famous animals/plants featured in physics in a similar way?
physics terminology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This crossed my mind today...
There is Schrödinger's cat and Newton's apple.
Are there any other famous animals/plants featured in physics in a similar way?
physics terminology
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
"Newton's apple" has nothing to do with physics. The story was invented by Newton's niece and popularized by Voltaire.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 16 at 23:07
$begingroup$
Does Maxwell's Demon count?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:02
$begingroup$
How about the elephants and turtles supporting the Earth?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This crossed my mind today...
There is Schrödinger's cat and Newton's apple.
Are there any other famous animals/plants featured in physics in a similar way?
physics terminology
$endgroup$
This crossed my mind today...
There is Schrödinger's cat and Newton's apple.
Are there any other famous animals/plants featured in physics in a similar way?
physics terminology
physics terminology
edited May 17 at 0:57
Conifold
36.4k157130
36.4k157130
asked May 16 at 20:25
user1583209user1583209
1183
1183
3
$begingroup$
"Newton's apple" has nothing to do with physics. The story was invented by Newton's niece and popularized by Voltaire.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 16 at 23:07
$begingroup$
Does Maxwell's Demon count?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:02
$begingroup$
How about the elephants and turtles supporting the Earth?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:06
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
"Newton's apple" has nothing to do with physics. The story was invented by Newton's niece and popularized by Voltaire.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 16 at 23:07
$begingroup$
Does Maxwell's Demon count?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:02
$begingroup$
How about the elephants and turtles supporting the Earth?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:06
3
3
$begingroup$
"Newton's apple" has nothing to do with physics. The story was invented by Newton's niece and popularized by Voltaire.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 16 at 23:07
$begingroup$
"Newton's apple" has nothing to do with physics. The story was invented by Newton's niece and popularized by Voltaire.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 16 at 23:07
$begingroup$
Does Maxwell's Demon count?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:02
$begingroup$
Does Maxwell's Demon count?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:02
$begingroup$
How about the elephants and turtles supporting the Earth?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:06
$begingroup$
How about the elephants and turtles supporting the Earth?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:06
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Arhytas made the first known steam powered toy in the shape of a pigeon, see The steam-powered pigeon of Archytas.
Priestley put a mint plant in a closed container with a burning candle. The candle flame went out after using up the oxygen, but after 27 days Priestley re-lit the candle, demonstrating that mint produces oxygen of its own.
Kekulé claimed, 25 years later, that he discovered the shape of the benzene molecule after having a dream of a snake biting its own tail. As with the apple, there are doubts that this actually happened.
Snake biting its own tail is an alchemic symbol called the ouroboros. It is sometimes also associated with Wallis's symbol for mathematical infinity (he did not make this association).
Pavlov's dog became a common metaphor for psychological conditioning after Pavlov's experiments with causing salivation in dogs by associating food with turning on a light bulb.
Asimov (who is a biochemist, in addition to the science fiction author) wrote a story about a goose that lays golden eggs, by transmuting oxygen-18 to gold-197 via an enzyme-catalyzed nuclear process. The goose can not reproduce due to heavy metal poisoning of the eggs, and a biopsy of the liver needed to uncover its secret would kill it. Asimov's riddle is to figure out how to make it reproduce (there is a scientific solution).
Parfit's “people who divide like an amoeba” illustrate a conundrum associated with brain transplants:
"My brain is divided, and each half is housed in a new body. Both resulting people have my character and apparent memories of my life. What happens to me?"
Jackson's Mary, the color scientist, who knows everything about the physics of colors, but grew up in a colorless room, sees a red tomato for the first time, and learns something new nonetheless. This illustrates the problem with explaining the so-called qualia.
A related earlier illustration is due to Wittgenstein, who imagined that everyone has a box where they keep a "beetle". That is everybody calls it "beetle", but "no one can look into anyone else's box, and everyone says he knows what a beetle is only by looking at his beetle". The point is to dispel the idea of a special non-physical entity, "mind".
Many of these sorts of things, featuring creatures or not, are what Mach called thought experiments, and there is extensive literature on them.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hmmm.. which 'scientific solution' do you subscribe to for the golden goose? I know of a couple and am happy to get drunk & explain why they most likely won't work. :-) . Also, AFAIK they did biopsy the liver, but (given the technology of the time) didn't find anything useful.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:04
1
$begingroup$
Pavlov's dog has nothing to do with physics or mathematics. Of course there are many famous animals in biology, but this is not what the question was about.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 17 at 21:58
1
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft Asimov's own is described in his self-commentary: deprive the goose of oxygen-18 by letting it only breathe oxygen-16. After oxygen-18 is used up the eggs should become viable. Not the first time when physical consequences of an unphysical premise are explored :)
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 4:54
$begingroup$
@AlexandreEremenko Why include mathematics? It is not mentioned in the OP either. And Kekulé's dream is about chemistry, not physics. Unless one takes "physics" broadly, but then neurophysiology is physics of brain function.
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 5:00
$begingroup$
@Conifold. Interesting (O-18)! But didn't the story mention feeding the goose random radioactive material? I suppose you could extend it to just moving the goose to some zero-radioactive element location.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 18 at 11:18
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
There's "Buridan's ass" in logic, which says that a "hungry donkey" will not be able to decide "between two completely alike bales of hay" (Duhem 2018 p. 13) and thus will starve. It's attributed to medieval physicist John Buridan (1295-1360), but a physics (not logic) version of it can be found in Aristotle's De Caelo 295b32 [375.]:
the man who, though exceedingly hungry and thirsty, and both equally, yet being equidistant from food and drink, is therefore bound to stay where he is
A good treatment of Buridan's ass can be found in Nicholas Rescher's Scholastic Meditations (ch. 1) or Studies in the History of Logic (ch. 7), "Choice without Preference: The Problem of Buridan's Ass".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If cosmology counts as part of physics, there's the famous turtles and elephants on which the world rests.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 21:56
$begingroup$
@kimchilover Is there a scientist, X, associated with that theory, as in "X's famous turtles and elephants"?
$endgroup$
– Geremia
May 16 at 22:03
$begingroup$
You could take a hint from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down : William James.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 22:27
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "587"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhsm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9612%2fwhat-animals-or-plants-were-used-to-illustrate-ideas-of-physics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Arhytas made the first known steam powered toy in the shape of a pigeon, see The steam-powered pigeon of Archytas.
Priestley put a mint plant in a closed container with a burning candle. The candle flame went out after using up the oxygen, but after 27 days Priestley re-lit the candle, demonstrating that mint produces oxygen of its own.
Kekulé claimed, 25 years later, that he discovered the shape of the benzene molecule after having a dream of a snake biting its own tail. As with the apple, there are doubts that this actually happened.
Snake biting its own tail is an alchemic symbol called the ouroboros. It is sometimes also associated with Wallis's symbol for mathematical infinity (he did not make this association).
Pavlov's dog became a common metaphor for psychological conditioning after Pavlov's experiments with causing salivation in dogs by associating food with turning on a light bulb.
Asimov (who is a biochemist, in addition to the science fiction author) wrote a story about a goose that lays golden eggs, by transmuting oxygen-18 to gold-197 via an enzyme-catalyzed nuclear process. The goose can not reproduce due to heavy metal poisoning of the eggs, and a biopsy of the liver needed to uncover its secret would kill it. Asimov's riddle is to figure out how to make it reproduce (there is a scientific solution).
Parfit's “people who divide like an amoeba” illustrate a conundrum associated with brain transplants:
"My brain is divided, and each half is housed in a new body. Both resulting people have my character and apparent memories of my life. What happens to me?"
Jackson's Mary, the color scientist, who knows everything about the physics of colors, but grew up in a colorless room, sees a red tomato for the first time, and learns something new nonetheless. This illustrates the problem with explaining the so-called qualia.
A related earlier illustration is due to Wittgenstein, who imagined that everyone has a box where they keep a "beetle". That is everybody calls it "beetle", but "no one can look into anyone else's box, and everyone says he knows what a beetle is only by looking at his beetle". The point is to dispel the idea of a special non-physical entity, "mind".
Many of these sorts of things, featuring creatures or not, are what Mach called thought experiments, and there is extensive literature on them.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hmmm.. which 'scientific solution' do you subscribe to for the golden goose? I know of a couple and am happy to get drunk & explain why they most likely won't work. :-) . Also, AFAIK they did biopsy the liver, but (given the technology of the time) didn't find anything useful.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:04
1
$begingroup$
Pavlov's dog has nothing to do with physics or mathematics. Of course there are many famous animals in biology, but this is not what the question was about.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 17 at 21:58
1
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft Asimov's own is described in his self-commentary: deprive the goose of oxygen-18 by letting it only breathe oxygen-16. After oxygen-18 is used up the eggs should become viable. Not the first time when physical consequences of an unphysical premise are explored :)
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 4:54
$begingroup$
@AlexandreEremenko Why include mathematics? It is not mentioned in the OP either. And Kekulé's dream is about chemistry, not physics. Unless one takes "physics" broadly, but then neurophysiology is physics of brain function.
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 5:00
$begingroup$
@Conifold. Interesting (O-18)! But didn't the story mention feeding the goose random radioactive material? I suppose you could extend it to just moving the goose to some zero-radioactive element location.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 18 at 11:18
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Arhytas made the first known steam powered toy in the shape of a pigeon, see The steam-powered pigeon of Archytas.
Priestley put a mint plant in a closed container with a burning candle. The candle flame went out after using up the oxygen, but after 27 days Priestley re-lit the candle, demonstrating that mint produces oxygen of its own.
Kekulé claimed, 25 years later, that he discovered the shape of the benzene molecule after having a dream of a snake biting its own tail. As with the apple, there are doubts that this actually happened.
Snake biting its own tail is an alchemic symbol called the ouroboros. It is sometimes also associated with Wallis's symbol for mathematical infinity (he did not make this association).
Pavlov's dog became a common metaphor for psychological conditioning after Pavlov's experiments with causing salivation in dogs by associating food with turning on a light bulb.
Asimov (who is a biochemist, in addition to the science fiction author) wrote a story about a goose that lays golden eggs, by transmuting oxygen-18 to gold-197 via an enzyme-catalyzed nuclear process. The goose can not reproduce due to heavy metal poisoning of the eggs, and a biopsy of the liver needed to uncover its secret would kill it. Asimov's riddle is to figure out how to make it reproduce (there is a scientific solution).
Parfit's “people who divide like an amoeba” illustrate a conundrum associated with brain transplants:
"My brain is divided, and each half is housed in a new body. Both resulting people have my character and apparent memories of my life. What happens to me?"
Jackson's Mary, the color scientist, who knows everything about the physics of colors, but grew up in a colorless room, sees a red tomato for the first time, and learns something new nonetheless. This illustrates the problem with explaining the so-called qualia.
A related earlier illustration is due to Wittgenstein, who imagined that everyone has a box where they keep a "beetle". That is everybody calls it "beetle", but "no one can look into anyone else's box, and everyone says he knows what a beetle is only by looking at his beetle". The point is to dispel the idea of a special non-physical entity, "mind".
Many of these sorts of things, featuring creatures or not, are what Mach called thought experiments, and there is extensive literature on them.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hmmm.. which 'scientific solution' do you subscribe to for the golden goose? I know of a couple and am happy to get drunk & explain why they most likely won't work. :-) . Also, AFAIK they did biopsy the liver, but (given the technology of the time) didn't find anything useful.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:04
1
$begingroup$
Pavlov's dog has nothing to do with physics or mathematics. Of course there are many famous animals in biology, but this is not what the question was about.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 17 at 21:58
1
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft Asimov's own is described in his self-commentary: deprive the goose of oxygen-18 by letting it only breathe oxygen-16. After oxygen-18 is used up the eggs should become viable. Not the first time when physical consequences of an unphysical premise are explored :)
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 4:54
$begingroup$
@AlexandreEremenko Why include mathematics? It is not mentioned in the OP either. And Kekulé's dream is about chemistry, not physics. Unless one takes "physics" broadly, but then neurophysiology is physics of brain function.
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 5:00
$begingroup$
@Conifold. Interesting (O-18)! But didn't the story mention feeding the goose random radioactive material? I suppose you could extend it to just moving the goose to some zero-radioactive element location.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 18 at 11:18
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Arhytas made the first known steam powered toy in the shape of a pigeon, see The steam-powered pigeon of Archytas.
Priestley put a mint plant in a closed container with a burning candle. The candle flame went out after using up the oxygen, but after 27 days Priestley re-lit the candle, demonstrating that mint produces oxygen of its own.
Kekulé claimed, 25 years later, that he discovered the shape of the benzene molecule after having a dream of a snake biting its own tail. As with the apple, there are doubts that this actually happened.
Snake biting its own tail is an alchemic symbol called the ouroboros. It is sometimes also associated with Wallis's symbol for mathematical infinity (he did not make this association).
Pavlov's dog became a common metaphor for psychological conditioning after Pavlov's experiments with causing salivation in dogs by associating food with turning on a light bulb.
Asimov (who is a biochemist, in addition to the science fiction author) wrote a story about a goose that lays golden eggs, by transmuting oxygen-18 to gold-197 via an enzyme-catalyzed nuclear process. The goose can not reproduce due to heavy metal poisoning of the eggs, and a biopsy of the liver needed to uncover its secret would kill it. Asimov's riddle is to figure out how to make it reproduce (there is a scientific solution).
Parfit's “people who divide like an amoeba” illustrate a conundrum associated with brain transplants:
"My brain is divided, and each half is housed in a new body. Both resulting people have my character and apparent memories of my life. What happens to me?"
Jackson's Mary, the color scientist, who knows everything about the physics of colors, but grew up in a colorless room, sees a red tomato for the first time, and learns something new nonetheless. This illustrates the problem with explaining the so-called qualia.
A related earlier illustration is due to Wittgenstein, who imagined that everyone has a box where they keep a "beetle". That is everybody calls it "beetle", but "no one can look into anyone else's box, and everyone says he knows what a beetle is only by looking at his beetle". The point is to dispel the idea of a special non-physical entity, "mind".
Many of these sorts of things, featuring creatures or not, are what Mach called thought experiments, and there is extensive literature on them.
$endgroup$
Arhytas made the first known steam powered toy in the shape of a pigeon, see The steam-powered pigeon of Archytas.
Priestley put a mint plant in a closed container with a burning candle. The candle flame went out after using up the oxygen, but after 27 days Priestley re-lit the candle, demonstrating that mint produces oxygen of its own.
Kekulé claimed, 25 years later, that he discovered the shape of the benzene molecule after having a dream of a snake biting its own tail. As with the apple, there are doubts that this actually happened.
Snake biting its own tail is an alchemic symbol called the ouroboros. It is sometimes also associated with Wallis's symbol for mathematical infinity (he did not make this association).
Pavlov's dog became a common metaphor for psychological conditioning after Pavlov's experiments with causing salivation in dogs by associating food with turning on a light bulb.
Asimov (who is a biochemist, in addition to the science fiction author) wrote a story about a goose that lays golden eggs, by transmuting oxygen-18 to gold-197 via an enzyme-catalyzed nuclear process. The goose can not reproduce due to heavy metal poisoning of the eggs, and a biopsy of the liver needed to uncover its secret would kill it. Asimov's riddle is to figure out how to make it reproduce (there is a scientific solution).
Parfit's “people who divide like an amoeba” illustrate a conundrum associated with brain transplants:
"My brain is divided, and each half is housed in a new body. Both resulting people have my character and apparent memories of my life. What happens to me?"
Jackson's Mary, the color scientist, who knows everything about the physics of colors, but grew up in a colorless room, sees a red tomato for the first time, and learns something new nonetheless. This illustrates the problem with explaining the so-called qualia.
A related earlier illustration is due to Wittgenstein, who imagined that everyone has a box where they keep a "beetle". That is everybody calls it "beetle", but "no one can look into anyone else's box, and everyone says he knows what a beetle is only by looking at his beetle". The point is to dispel the idea of a special non-physical entity, "mind".
Many of these sorts of things, featuring creatures or not, are what Mach called thought experiments, and there is extensive literature on them.
edited May 17 at 0:55
answered May 16 at 23:57
ConifoldConifold
36.4k157130
36.4k157130
$begingroup$
Hmmm.. which 'scientific solution' do you subscribe to for the golden goose? I know of a couple and am happy to get drunk & explain why they most likely won't work. :-) . Also, AFAIK they did biopsy the liver, but (given the technology of the time) didn't find anything useful.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:04
1
$begingroup$
Pavlov's dog has nothing to do with physics or mathematics. Of course there are many famous animals in biology, but this is not what the question was about.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 17 at 21:58
1
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft Asimov's own is described in his self-commentary: deprive the goose of oxygen-18 by letting it only breathe oxygen-16. After oxygen-18 is used up the eggs should become viable. Not the first time when physical consequences of an unphysical premise are explored :)
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 4:54
$begingroup$
@AlexandreEremenko Why include mathematics? It is not mentioned in the OP either. And Kekulé's dream is about chemistry, not physics. Unless one takes "physics" broadly, but then neurophysiology is physics of brain function.
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 5:00
$begingroup$
@Conifold. Interesting (O-18)! But didn't the story mention feeding the goose random radioactive material? I suppose you could extend it to just moving the goose to some zero-radioactive element location.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 18 at 11:18
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Hmmm.. which 'scientific solution' do you subscribe to for the golden goose? I know of a couple and am happy to get drunk & explain why they most likely won't work. :-) . Also, AFAIK they did biopsy the liver, but (given the technology of the time) didn't find anything useful.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:04
1
$begingroup$
Pavlov's dog has nothing to do with physics or mathematics. Of course there are many famous animals in biology, but this is not what the question was about.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 17 at 21:58
1
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft Asimov's own is described in his self-commentary: deprive the goose of oxygen-18 by letting it only breathe oxygen-16. After oxygen-18 is used up the eggs should become viable. Not the first time when physical consequences of an unphysical premise are explored :)
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 4:54
$begingroup$
@AlexandreEremenko Why include mathematics? It is not mentioned in the OP either. And Kekulé's dream is about chemistry, not physics. Unless one takes "physics" broadly, but then neurophysiology is physics of brain function.
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 5:00
$begingroup$
@Conifold. Interesting (O-18)! But didn't the story mention feeding the goose random radioactive material? I suppose you could extend it to just moving the goose to some zero-radioactive element location.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
Hmmm.. which 'scientific solution' do you subscribe to for the golden goose? I know of a couple and am happy to get drunk & explain why they most likely won't work. :-) . Also, AFAIK they did biopsy the liver, but (given the technology of the time) didn't find anything useful.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:04
$begingroup$
Hmmm.. which 'scientific solution' do you subscribe to for the golden goose? I know of a couple and am happy to get drunk & explain why they most likely won't work. :-) . Also, AFAIK they did biopsy the liver, but (given the technology of the time) didn't find anything useful.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:04
1
1
$begingroup$
Pavlov's dog has nothing to do with physics or mathematics. Of course there are many famous animals in biology, but this is not what the question was about.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 17 at 21:58
$begingroup$
Pavlov's dog has nothing to do with physics or mathematics. Of course there are many famous animals in biology, but this is not what the question was about.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 17 at 21:58
1
1
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft Asimov's own is described in his self-commentary: deprive the goose of oxygen-18 by letting it only breathe oxygen-16. After oxygen-18 is used up the eggs should become viable. Not the first time when physical consequences of an unphysical premise are explored :)
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 4:54
$begingroup$
@CarlWitthoft Asimov's own is described in his self-commentary: deprive the goose of oxygen-18 by letting it only breathe oxygen-16. After oxygen-18 is used up the eggs should become viable. Not the first time when physical consequences of an unphysical premise are explored :)
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 4:54
$begingroup$
@AlexandreEremenko Why include mathematics? It is not mentioned in the OP either. And Kekulé's dream is about chemistry, not physics. Unless one takes "physics" broadly, but then neurophysiology is physics of brain function.
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 5:00
$begingroup$
@AlexandreEremenko Why include mathematics? It is not mentioned in the OP either. And Kekulé's dream is about chemistry, not physics. Unless one takes "physics" broadly, but then neurophysiology is physics of brain function.
$endgroup$
– Conifold
May 18 at 5:00
$begingroup$
@Conifold. Interesting (O-18)! But didn't the story mention feeding the goose random radioactive material? I suppose you could extend it to just moving the goose to some zero-radioactive element location.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
@Conifold. Interesting (O-18)! But didn't the story mention feeding the goose random radioactive material? I suppose you could extend it to just moving the goose to some zero-radioactive element location.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 18 at 11:18
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
There's "Buridan's ass" in logic, which says that a "hungry donkey" will not be able to decide "between two completely alike bales of hay" (Duhem 2018 p. 13) and thus will starve. It's attributed to medieval physicist John Buridan (1295-1360), but a physics (not logic) version of it can be found in Aristotle's De Caelo 295b32 [375.]:
the man who, though exceedingly hungry and thirsty, and both equally, yet being equidistant from food and drink, is therefore bound to stay where he is
A good treatment of Buridan's ass can be found in Nicholas Rescher's Scholastic Meditations (ch. 1) or Studies in the History of Logic (ch. 7), "Choice without Preference: The Problem of Buridan's Ass".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If cosmology counts as part of physics, there's the famous turtles and elephants on which the world rests.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 21:56
$begingroup$
@kimchilover Is there a scientist, X, associated with that theory, as in "X's famous turtles and elephants"?
$endgroup$
– Geremia
May 16 at 22:03
$begingroup$
You could take a hint from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down : William James.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 22:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's "Buridan's ass" in logic, which says that a "hungry donkey" will not be able to decide "between two completely alike bales of hay" (Duhem 2018 p. 13) and thus will starve. It's attributed to medieval physicist John Buridan (1295-1360), but a physics (not logic) version of it can be found in Aristotle's De Caelo 295b32 [375.]:
the man who, though exceedingly hungry and thirsty, and both equally, yet being equidistant from food and drink, is therefore bound to stay where he is
A good treatment of Buridan's ass can be found in Nicholas Rescher's Scholastic Meditations (ch. 1) or Studies in the History of Logic (ch. 7), "Choice without Preference: The Problem of Buridan's Ass".
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If cosmology counts as part of physics, there's the famous turtles and elephants on which the world rests.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 21:56
$begingroup$
@kimchilover Is there a scientist, X, associated with that theory, as in "X's famous turtles and elephants"?
$endgroup$
– Geremia
May 16 at 22:03
$begingroup$
You could take a hint from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down : William James.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 22:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's "Buridan's ass" in logic, which says that a "hungry donkey" will not be able to decide "between two completely alike bales of hay" (Duhem 2018 p. 13) and thus will starve. It's attributed to medieval physicist John Buridan (1295-1360), but a physics (not logic) version of it can be found in Aristotle's De Caelo 295b32 [375.]:
the man who, though exceedingly hungry and thirsty, and both equally, yet being equidistant from food and drink, is therefore bound to stay where he is
A good treatment of Buridan's ass can be found in Nicholas Rescher's Scholastic Meditations (ch. 1) or Studies in the History of Logic (ch. 7), "Choice without Preference: The Problem of Buridan's Ass".
$endgroup$
There's "Buridan's ass" in logic, which says that a "hungry donkey" will not be able to decide "between two completely alike bales of hay" (Duhem 2018 p. 13) and thus will starve. It's attributed to medieval physicist John Buridan (1295-1360), but a physics (not logic) version of it can be found in Aristotle's De Caelo 295b32 [375.]:
the man who, though exceedingly hungry and thirsty, and both equally, yet being equidistant from food and drink, is therefore bound to stay where he is
A good treatment of Buridan's ass can be found in Nicholas Rescher's Scholastic Meditations (ch. 1) or Studies in the History of Logic (ch. 7), "Choice without Preference: The Problem of Buridan's Ass".
edited May 16 at 21:36
answered May 16 at 21:22
GeremiaGeremia
2,836731
2,836731
$begingroup$
If cosmology counts as part of physics, there's the famous turtles and elephants on which the world rests.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 21:56
$begingroup$
@kimchilover Is there a scientist, X, associated with that theory, as in "X's famous turtles and elephants"?
$endgroup$
– Geremia
May 16 at 22:03
$begingroup$
You could take a hint from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down : William James.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 22:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If cosmology counts as part of physics, there's the famous turtles and elephants on which the world rests.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 21:56
$begingroup$
@kimchilover Is there a scientist, X, associated with that theory, as in "X's famous turtles and elephants"?
$endgroup$
– Geremia
May 16 at 22:03
$begingroup$
You could take a hint from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down : William James.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 22:27
$begingroup$
If cosmology counts as part of physics, there's the famous turtles and elephants on which the world rests.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 21:56
$begingroup$
If cosmology counts as part of physics, there's the famous turtles and elephants on which the world rests.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 21:56
$begingroup$
@kimchilover Is there a scientist, X, associated with that theory, as in "X's famous turtles and elephants"?
$endgroup$
– Geremia
May 16 at 22:03
$begingroup$
@kimchilover Is there a scientist, X, associated with that theory, as in "X's famous turtles and elephants"?
$endgroup$
– Geremia
May 16 at 22:03
$begingroup$
You could take a hint from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down : William James.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 22:27
$begingroup$
You could take a hint from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down : William James.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
May 16 at 22:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to History of Science and Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhsm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9612%2fwhat-animals-or-plants-were-used-to-illustrate-ideas-of-physics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
"Newton's apple" has nothing to do with physics. The story was invented by Newton's niece and popularized by Voltaire.
$endgroup$
– Alexandre Eremenko
May 16 at 23:07
$begingroup$
Does Maxwell's Demon count?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:02
$begingroup$
How about the elephants and turtles supporting the Earth?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
May 17 at 12:06