Linux multipath: How to configure a single multibus path groupLinux / Multipath not using all paths, and won't use queue-length path_selector?Linux-HA + dm-multipath: path removal causes segfault, kernel null pointer dereference, and STONITHFC multipath says “device busy ” when connecting again. SLES 11 - netapp - emulexDell PowerVault MD3200i dm-multipath configuration and performance snags in Debian 6.0 (squeeze)Does MPIO aggregate bandwidth for a single connection?Linux Multipath - Can a Host connect to two different SANs?Number of device listed with multipath -llHow to fix my broken raid10 arrayLinux multipath 1 lun not using all paths other luns OKopen-iscsi initiator on linux does not see the passive side of an active/passive open-e target

What should I do about a religious player who refuses to accept the existence of multiple gods in D&D?

The most awesome army: 80 men left and 81 returned. Is it true?

Why does the UK have more political parties than the US?

What is the intuition behind uniform continuity?

How much current can Baofeng UV-5R provide on +V pin?

Why is there a need to modify system call tables in Linux?

Is American Express widely accepted in France?

Why would Lupin kill Pettigrew?

The oldest tradition stopped before it got back to him

What does it mean by "d-ism of Leibniz" and "dotage of Newton" in simple English?

Parsing CSV with AWK to Produce HTML Output

Modern approach to radio buttons

Joist hangers to use for rough cut 2x8 (2 3/4" x 8 3/4")?

Is there a way to save this session?

Can I ask a publisher for a paper that I need for reviewing

Humans meet a distant alien species. How do they standardize? - Units of Measure

What caused the tendency for conservatives to not support climate change regulations?

Future enhancements for the finite element method

Is the capacitor drawn or wired wrongly?

Can an old DSLR be upgraded to match modern smartphone image quality

Why does my electric oven present the option of 40A and 50A breakers?

Is it possible to kill all life on Earth?

How was Apollo supposed to rendezvous in the case of a lunar abort?

Strange math syntax in old basic listing



Linux multipath: How to configure a single multibus path group


Linux / Multipath not using all paths, and won't use queue-length path_selector?Linux-HA + dm-multipath: path removal causes segfault, kernel null pointer dereference, and STONITHFC multipath says “device busy ” when connecting again. SLES 11 - netapp - emulexDell PowerVault MD3200i dm-multipath configuration and performance snags in Debian 6.0 (squeeze)Does MPIO aggregate bandwidth for a single connection?Linux Multipath - Can a Host connect to two different SANs?Number of device listed with multipath -llHow to fix my broken raid10 arrayLinux multipath 1 lun not using all paths other luns OKopen-iscsi initiator on linux does not see the passive side of an active/passive open-e target






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








3















I have just upgraded a functional Ubuntu 16.04 host to 18.04 and am now having issues with multipath.



Package versions:
* multipath-tools 0.7.4-2ubuntu3
* open-iscsi 2.0.874-5ubuntu2.7



I have a Dell PowerVault MD3860i with four paths to the host. Before the upgrade, multipath -ll looked like this:



backupeng (3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5) dm-2 DELL,MD38xxi
size=8.0T features='0' hwhandler='0' wp=rw
`-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=1 status=active
|- 3:0:0:1 sdb 8:16 active ready running
|- 4:0:0:1 sdc 8:32 active ready running
|- 5:0:0:1 sdd 8:48 active ready running
`- 6:0:0:1 sde 8:64 active ready running


Now it looks like this:



backupeng (3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5) dm-2 DELL,MD38xxi
size=8.0T features='3 queue_if_no_path pg_init_retries 50' hwhandler='1 rdac' wp=rw
|-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=14 status=active
| |- 5:0:0:1 sdd 8:48 active ready running
| `- 6:0:0:1 sde 8:64 active ready running
`-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=9 status=enabled
|- 3:0:0:1 sdb 8:16 active ready running
`- 4:0:0:1 sdc 8:32 active ready running


My /etc/multipath.conf looks like this:



defaults 
user_friendly_names yes
path_selector "round-robin 0"
path_grouping_policy multibus


multipaths
multipath
wwid 3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5
alias backupeng




For performance reasons, I need to have all paths in the same path group, like they were before. My understanding is that path_grouping_policy multibus is supposed to do this. I have tried restarting multipathd, setting up the iscsi and multipath configs on the host from scratch, and so on for the past few hours.



I can paste the full output of multipathd -k -> show config but what I'm seeing in there agrees with my multipath.conf file. Is there any other information I can provide?










share|improve this question




























    3















    I have just upgraded a functional Ubuntu 16.04 host to 18.04 and am now having issues with multipath.



    Package versions:
    * multipath-tools 0.7.4-2ubuntu3
    * open-iscsi 2.0.874-5ubuntu2.7



    I have a Dell PowerVault MD3860i with four paths to the host. Before the upgrade, multipath -ll looked like this:



    backupeng (3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5) dm-2 DELL,MD38xxi
    size=8.0T features='0' hwhandler='0' wp=rw
    `-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=1 status=active
    |- 3:0:0:1 sdb 8:16 active ready running
    |- 4:0:0:1 sdc 8:32 active ready running
    |- 5:0:0:1 sdd 8:48 active ready running
    `- 6:0:0:1 sde 8:64 active ready running


    Now it looks like this:



    backupeng (3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5) dm-2 DELL,MD38xxi
    size=8.0T features='3 queue_if_no_path pg_init_retries 50' hwhandler='1 rdac' wp=rw
    |-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=14 status=active
    | |- 5:0:0:1 sdd 8:48 active ready running
    | `- 6:0:0:1 sde 8:64 active ready running
    `-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=9 status=enabled
    |- 3:0:0:1 sdb 8:16 active ready running
    `- 4:0:0:1 sdc 8:32 active ready running


    My /etc/multipath.conf looks like this:



    defaults 
    user_friendly_names yes
    path_selector "round-robin 0"
    path_grouping_policy multibus


    multipaths
    multipath
    wwid 3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5
    alias backupeng




    For performance reasons, I need to have all paths in the same path group, like they were before. My understanding is that path_grouping_policy multibus is supposed to do this. I have tried restarting multipathd, setting up the iscsi and multipath configs on the host from scratch, and so on for the past few hours.



    I can paste the full output of multipathd -k -> show config but what I'm seeing in there agrees with my multipath.conf file. Is there any other information I can provide?










    share|improve this question
























      3












      3








      3








      I have just upgraded a functional Ubuntu 16.04 host to 18.04 and am now having issues with multipath.



      Package versions:
      * multipath-tools 0.7.4-2ubuntu3
      * open-iscsi 2.0.874-5ubuntu2.7



      I have a Dell PowerVault MD3860i with four paths to the host. Before the upgrade, multipath -ll looked like this:



      backupeng (3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5) dm-2 DELL,MD38xxi
      size=8.0T features='0' hwhandler='0' wp=rw
      `-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=1 status=active
      |- 3:0:0:1 sdb 8:16 active ready running
      |- 4:0:0:1 sdc 8:32 active ready running
      |- 5:0:0:1 sdd 8:48 active ready running
      `- 6:0:0:1 sde 8:64 active ready running


      Now it looks like this:



      backupeng (3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5) dm-2 DELL,MD38xxi
      size=8.0T features='3 queue_if_no_path pg_init_retries 50' hwhandler='1 rdac' wp=rw
      |-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=14 status=active
      | |- 5:0:0:1 sdd 8:48 active ready running
      | `- 6:0:0:1 sde 8:64 active ready running
      `-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=9 status=enabled
      |- 3:0:0:1 sdb 8:16 active ready running
      `- 4:0:0:1 sdc 8:32 active ready running


      My /etc/multipath.conf looks like this:



      defaults 
      user_friendly_names yes
      path_selector "round-robin 0"
      path_grouping_policy multibus


      multipaths
      multipath
      wwid 3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5
      alias backupeng




      For performance reasons, I need to have all paths in the same path group, like they were before. My understanding is that path_grouping_policy multibus is supposed to do this. I have tried restarting multipathd, setting up the iscsi and multipath configs on the host from scratch, and so on for the past few hours.



      I can paste the full output of multipathd -k -> show config but what I'm seeing in there agrees with my multipath.conf file. Is there any other information I can provide?










      share|improve this question














      I have just upgraded a functional Ubuntu 16.04 host to 18.04 and am now having issues with multipath.



      Package versions:
      * multipath-tools 0.7.4-2ubuntu3
      * open-iscsi 2.0.874-5ubuntu2.7



      I have a Dell PowerVault MD3860i with four paths to the host. Before the upgrade, multipath -ll looked like this:



      backupeng (3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5) dm-2 DELL,MD38xxi
      size=8.0T features='0' hwhandler='0' wp=rw
      `-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=1 status=active
      |- 3:0:0:1 sdb 8:16 active ready running
      |- 4:0:0:1 sdc 8:32 active ready running
      |- 5:0:0:1 sdd 8:48 active ready running
      `- 6:0:0:1 sde 8:64 active ready running


      Now it looks like this:



      backupeng (3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5) dm-2 DELL,MD38xxi
      size=8.0T features='3 queue_if_no_path pg_init_retries 50' hwhandler='1 rdac' wp=rw
      |-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=14 status=active
      | |- 5:0:0:1 sdd 8:48 active ready running
      | `- 6:0:0:1 sde 8:64 active ready running
      `-+- policy='round-robin 0' prio=9 status=enabled
      |- 3:0:0:1 sdb 8:16 active ready running
      `- 4:0:0:1 sdc 8:32 active ready running


      My /etc/multipath.conf looks like this:



      defaults 
      user_friendly_names yes
      path_selector "round-robin 0"
      path_grouping_policy multibus


      multipaths
      multipath
      wwid 3600a098000b5efae00000e9a5b9b58f5
      alias backupeng




      For performance reasons, I need to have all paths in the same path group, like they were before. My understanding is that path_grouping_policy multibus is supposed to do this. I have tried restarting multipathd, setting up the iscsi and multipath configs on the host from scratch, and so on for the past few hours.



      I can paste the full output of multipathd -k -> show config but what I'm seeing in there agrees with my multipath.conf file. Is there any other information I can provide?







      linux ubuntu iscsi multipath






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked May 16 at 21:54









      EilEil

      119229




      119229




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Have you actually measured the performance and found it degraded? You may actually find it's improved, although the difference may not be very large.



          The Dell PowerVault MD3860i seems to be an active/passive (also known as asymmetric, or ALUA) style storage system: it has two storage controllers, and each of the disks are considered "owned by" one of the controllers at any given time. If a disk is being accessed through a controller that doesn't currently "own" the disk, it triggers an ownership switch which adds some extra latency to the disk I/O operation.



          As a result, it is preferable to use only the paths that use the controller that currently owns the disk being accessed.



          Your new multipath -ll output indicates that dm-multipath is receiving ALUA information from the storage system using the rdac protocol. That is, the storage controller is telling dm-multipath which paths it should currently use. The rdac protocol is an older protocol used by LSI/Engenio/NetApp storage controllers and their OEMs, and it is well understood. There are other similar vendor-specific protocols, and the SCSI-3 ALUA would be the new standard way of conveying this information, although not all storage systems use it yet.



          You are setting the default path_grouping_policy to multibus, but it is very likely being overridden by hardware-specific defaults compiled into multipath-tools. (Specific beats general: any settings in applicable device or multipath sections will override the values set in the defaults section.)



          These built-in defaults are implemented in cooperation with storage device manufacturers; apparently the multipath-tools version in Ubuntu 16.04 did not yet have specific defaults for Dell PowerVault MD3860i, but in Ubuntu 18.04 it has.



          You can view these built-in defaults with sudo multipath -t.
          For your storage system, the relevant group of settings will probably look like this:



           device 
          vendor "DELL"
          product "(MD34xx


          The multibus path_grouping_policy is intended for true active/active storage systems, which allow you to use any and all paths with no restrictions. These tend to be larger, higher-tier storage products.



          You can write your own device ... or overrides ... block in multipath.conf to override these settings, but you should do so in production only if you have specific information from the storage vendor to do so, or if you have the test results to prove you actually know better than the vendor and the dm-multipath developers.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            So multipath is doing what it should and I am, in fact, going crazy. Or at least I have some more learning to do where storage is concerned. Everything you said makes sense and I've accepted your answer. Thanks!

            – Eil
            May 17 at 17:21











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "2"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f967687%2flinux-multipath-how-to-configure-a-single-multibus-path-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          Have you actually measured the performance and found it degraded? You may actually find it's improved, although the difference may not be very large.



          The Dell PowerVault MD3860i seems to be an active/passive (also known as asymmetric, or ALUA) style storage system: it has two storage controllers, and each of the disks are considered "owned by" one of the controllers at any given time. If a disk is being accessed through a controller that doesn't currently "own" the disk, it triggers an ownership switch which adds some extra latency to the disk I/O operation.



          As a result, it is preferable to use only the paths that use the controller that currently owns the disk being accessed.



          Your new multipath -ll output indicates that dm-multipath is receiving ALUA information from the storage system using the rdac protocol. That is, the storage controller is telling dm-multipath which paths it should currently use. The rdac protocol is an older protocol used by LSI/Engenio/NetApp storage controllers and their OEMs, and it is well understood. There are other similar vendor-specific protocols, and the SCSI-3 ALUA would be the new standard way of conveying this information, although not all storage systems use it yet.



          You are setting the default path_grouping_policy to multibus, but it is very likely being overridden by hardware-specific defaults compiled into multipath-tools. (Specific beats general: any settings in applicable device or multipath sections will override the values set in the defaults section.)



          These built-in defaults are implemented in cooperation with storage device manufacturers; apparently the multipath-tools version in Ubuntu 16.04 did not yet have specific defaults for Dell PowerVault MD3860i, but in Ubuntu 18.04 it has.



          You can view these built-in defaults with sudo multipath -t.
          For your storage system, the relevant group of settings will probably look like this:



           device 
          vendor "DELL"
          product "(MD34xx


          The multibus path_grouping_policy is intended for true active/active storage systems, which allow you to use any and all paths with no restrictions. These tend to be larger, higher-tier storage products.



          You can write your own device ... or overrides ... block in multipath.conf to override these settings, but you should do so in production only if you have specific information from the storage vendor to do so, or if you have the test results to prove you actually know better than the vendor and the dm-multipath developers.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            So multipath is doing what it should and I am, in fact, going crazy. Or at least I have some more learning to do where storage is concerned. Everything you said makes sense and I've accepted your answer. Thanks!

            – Eil
            May 17 at 17:21















          2














          Have you actually measured the performance and found it degraded? You may actually find it's improved, although the difference may not be very large.



          The Dell PowerVault MD3860i seems to be an active/passive (also known as asymmetric, or ALUA) style storage system: it has two storage controllers, and each of the disks are considered "owned by" one of the controllers at any given time. If a disk is being accessed through a controller that doesn't currently "own" the disk, it triggers an ownership switch which adds some extra latency to the disk I/O operation.



          As a result, it is preferable to use only the paths that use the controller that currently owns the disk being accessed.



          Your new multipath -ll output indicates that dm-multipath is receiving ALUA information from the storage system using the rdac protocol. That is, the storage controller is telling dm-multipath which paths it should currently use. The rdac protocol is an older protocol used by LSI/Engenio/NetApp storage controllers and their OEMs, and it is well understood. There are other similar vendor-specific protocols, and the SCSI-3 ALUA would be the new standard way of conveying this information, although not all storage systems use it yet.



          You are setting the default path_grouping_policy to multibus, but it is very likely being overridden by hardware-specific defaults compiled into multipath-tools. (Specific beats general: any settings in applicable device or multipath sections will override the values set in the defaults section.)



          These built-in defaults are implemented in cooperation with storage device manufacturers; apparently the multipath-tools version in Ubuntu 16.04 did not yet have specific defaults for Dell PowerVault MD3860i, but in Ubuntu 18.04 it has.



          You can view these built-in defaults with sudo multipath -t.
          For your storage system, the relevant group of settings will probably look like this:



           device 
          vendor "DELL"
          product "(MD34xx


          The multibus path_grouping_policy is intended for true active/active storage systems, which allow you to use any and all paths with no restrictions. These tend to be larger, higher-tier storage products.



          You can write your own device ... or overrides ... block in multipath.conf to override these settings, but you should do so in production only if you have specific information from the storage vendor to do so, or if you have the test results to prove you actually know better than the vendor and the dm-multipath developers.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            So multipath is doing what it should and I am, in fact, going crazy. Or at least I have some more learning to do where storage is concerned. Everything you said makes sense and I've accepted your answer. Thanks!

            – Eil
            May 17 at 17:21













          2












          2








          2







          Have you actually measured the performance and found it degraded? You may actually find it's improved, although the difference may not be very large.



          The Dell PowerVault MD3860i seems to be an active/passive (also known as asymmetric, or ALUA) style storage system: it has two storage controllers, and each of the disks are considered "owned by" one of the controllers at any given time. If a disk is being accessed through a controller that doesn't currently "own" the disk, it triggers an ownership switch which adds some extra latency to the disk I/O operation.



          As a result, it is preferable to use only the paths that use the controller that currently owns the disk being accessed.



          Your new multipath -ll output indicates that dm-multipath is receiving ALUA information from the storage system using the rdac protocol. That is, the storage controller is telling dm-multipath which paths it should currently use. The rdac protocol is an older protocol used by LSI/Engenio/NetApp storage controllers and their OEMs, and it is well understood. There are other similar vendor-specific protocols, and the SCSI-3 ALUA would be the new standard way of conveying this information, although not all storage systems use it yet.



          You are setting the default path_grouping_policy to multibus, but it is very likely being overridden by hardware-specific defaults compiled into multipath-tools. (Specific beats general: any settings in applicable device or multipath sections will override the values set in the defaults section.)



          These built-in defaults are implemented in cooperation with storage device manufacturers; apparently the multipath-tools version in Ubuntu 16.04 did not yet have specific defaults for Dell PowerVault MD3860i, but in Ubuntu 18.04 it has.



          You can view these built-in defaults with sudo multipath -t.
          For your storage system, the relevant group of settings will probably look like this:



           device 
          vendor "DELL"
          product "(MD34xx


          The multibus path_grouping_policy is intended for true active/active storage systems, which allow you to use any and all paths with no restrictions. These tend to be larger, higher-tier storage products.



          You can write your own device ... or overrides ... block in multipath.conf to override these settings, but you should do so in production only if you have specific information from the storage vendor to do so, or if you have the test results to prove you actually know better than the vendor and the dm-multipath developers.






          share|improve this answer













          Have you actually measured the performance and found it degraded? You may actually find it's improved, although the difference may not be very large.



          The Dell PowerVault MD3860i seems to be an active/passive (also known as asymmetric, or ALUA) style storage system: it has two storage controllers, and each of the disks are considered "owned by" one of the controllers at any given time. If a disk is being accessed through a controller that doesn't currently "own" the disk, it triggers an ownership switch which adds some extra latency to the disk I/O operation.



          As a result, it is preferable to use only the paths that use the controller that currently owns the disk being accessed.



          Your new multipath -ll output indicates that dm-multipath is receiving ALUA information from the storage system using the rdac protocol. That is, the storage controller is telling dm-multipath which paths it should currently use. The rdac protocol is an older protocol used by LSI/Engenio/NetApp storage controllers and their OEMs, and it is well understood. There are other similar vendor-specific protocols, and the SCSI-3 ALUA would be the new standard way of conveying this information, although not all storage systems use it yet.



          You are setting the default path_grouping_policy to multibus, but it is very likely being overridden by hardware-specific defaults compiled into multipath-tools. (Specific beats general: any settings in applicable device or multipath sections will override the values set in the defaults section.)



          These built-in defaults are implemented in cooperation with storage device manufacturers; apparently the multipath-tools version in Ubuntu 16.04 did not yet have specific defaults for Dell PowerVault MD3860i, but in Ubuntu 18.04 it has.



          You can view these built-in defaults with sudo multipath -t.
          For your storage system, the relevant group of settings will probably look like this:



           device 
          vendor "DELL"
          product "(MD34xx


          The multibus path_grouping_policy is intended for true active/active storage systems, which allow you to use any and all paths with no restrictions. These tend to be larger, higher-tier storage products.



          You can write your own device ... or overrides ... block in multipath.conf to override these settings, but you should do so in production only if you have specific information from the storage vendor to do so, or if you have the test results to prove you actually know better than the vendor and the dm-multipath developers.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 17 at 5:46









          telcoMtelcoM

          2,832715




          2,832715







          • 1





            So multipath is doing what it should and I am, in fact, going crazy. Or at least I have some more learning to do where storage is concerned. Everything you said makes sense and I've accepted your answer. Thanks!

            – Eil
            May 17 at 17:21












          • 1





            So multipath is doing what it should and I am, in fact, going crazy. Or at least I have some more learning to do where storage is concerned. Everything you said makes sense and I've accepted your answer. Thanks!

            – Eil
            May 17 at 17:21







          1




          1





          So multipath is doing what it should and I am, in fact, going crazy. Or at least I have some more learning to do where storage is concerned. Everything you said makes sense and I've accepted your answer. Thanks!

          – Eil
          May 17 at 17:21





          So multipath is doing what it should and I am, in fact, going crazy. Or at least I have some more learning to do where storage is concerned. Everything you said makes sense and I've accepted your answer. Thanks!

          – Eil
          May 17 at 17:21

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f967687%2flinux-multipath-how-to-configure-a-single-multibus-path-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

          Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

          What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company