Reference for electronegativities of different metal oxidation statesReaction between potassium permanganate, alum, and sodium hydrogen sulfiteWhich plastic type is used inside dishwashers?What factors influence the resultant oxidation state of Fe in 3Ca(OH)2+2FeCL3?Oxidation states of iron in Roussin's saltsPredominance of III oxidation state for lanthanidesNomenclature of polyatomic ionsWhat are oxidation states used for?experimentally determine oxidation state of Iron compoundWhat are the magnetic properties of [Ni(S2C2Ph2)2]^z's 3 oxidation states?Stability of 3d metal fluorides and iodides in different oxidation states
Did Darth Vader wear the same suit for 20+ years?
Applicants clearly not having the skills they advertise
Setting extra bits in a bool makes it true and false at the same time
Will dual-learning in a glider make my airplane learning safer?
Please help me identify this plane
Is there a rule that prohibits us from using 2 possessives in a row?
Do marked cards or loaded dice have any mechanical benefit?
How can I add depth to my story or how do I determine if my story already has depth?
How can I make 20-200 ohm variable resistor look like a 20-240 ohm resistor?
Why was it possible to cause an Apple //e to shut down with SHIFT and paddle button 2?
How to decline physical affection from a child whose parents are pressuring them?
Is there a practical difference between different types of Berachos?
Short story written from alien perspective with this line: "It's too bright to look at, so they don't"
Is the capacitor drawn or wired wrongly?
What is the right way to float a home lab?
What is a simple, physical situation where complex numbers emerge naturally?
Unorthodox way of solving Einstein field equations
Unconventional Opposites
What's the most polite way to tell a manager "shut up and let me work"?
Is American Express widely accepted in France?
Pros and cons of writing a book review?
You've spoiled/damaged the card
How to apply the "glow" effect to a rectangle with tcolorbox?
Is there any Biblical Basis for 400 years of silence between Old and New Testament?
Reference for electronegativities of different metal oxidation states
Reaction between potassium permanganate, alum, and sodium hydrogen sulfiteWhich plastic type is used inside dishwashers?What factors influence the resultant oxidation state of Fe in 3Ca(OH)2+2FeCL3?Oxidation states of iron in Roussin's saltsPredominance of III oxidation state for lanthanidesNomenclature of polyatomic ionsWhat are oxidation states used for?experimentally determine oxidation state of Iron compoundWhat are the magnetic properties of [Ni(S2C2Ph2)2]^z's 3 oxidation states?Stability of 3d metal fluorides and iodides in different oxidation states
$begingroup$
A long time ago I was researching the effect of the self regulatory response in Fe and Co. I found that my results made sense based on the idea of the electronegativity of the ions considered. I found a webpage that listed the relationship between the different electronegativities for different oxidation states of Fe and Co.
My problem is I didn't save the webpage and I don't know where I found it. I am not a chemist so I don't know in which kind of books I could find a list of values of electronegativities for different oxidized ions.
It basically said that the relationship between the electronegativities was something like
$$ceCo^2+ < ceFe^2+ < ceFe^3+ < ceCo^3+$$
Note: I don't remember it well, so what I wrote could be lies. The important thing was that there was a flip of order in electronegativities for Fe and Co when changing oxidation state.
Does anyone know where I could find that kind of information? I tried googling, but I am not finding the webpage and don't remember the terms I used to find it in the first place.
I never understood the why of the order either, and I have seen chemist webpages that tell you which ion is more electronegative by just looking at it. If someone could explain that too I would appreciate it.
Edit:
I forgot to add that it was in octahedral complexes. I was able to find this pdf online (page 32) but it doesn't state a reference. 
inorganic-chemistry transition-metals oxidation-state reference-request electronegativity
edited May 17 at 22:15
orthocresol♦
41.1k7124255
asked May 17 at 20:08
M.O.M.O.
1036
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A long time ago I was researching the effect of the self regulatory response in Fe and Co. I found that my results made sense based on the idea of the electronegativity of the ions considered. I found a webpage that listed the relationship between the different electronegativities for different oxidation states of Fe and Co.
My problem is I didn't save the webpage and I don't know where I found it. I am not a chemist so I don't know in which kind of books I could find a list of values of electronegativities for different oxidized ions.
It basically said that the relationship between the electronegativities was something like
$$ceCo^2+ < ceFe^2+ < ceFe^3+ < ceCo^3+$$
Note: I don't remember it well, so what I wrote could be lies. The important thing was that there was a flip of order in electronegativities for Fe and Co when changing oxidation state.
Does anyone know where I could find that kind of information? I tried googling, but I am not finding the webpage and don't remember the terms I used to find it in the first place.
I never understood the why of the order either, and I have seen chemist webpages that tell you which ion is more electronegative by just looking at it. If someone could explain that too I would appreciate it.
Edit:
I forgot to add that it was in octahedral complexes. I was able to find this pdf online (page 32) but it doesn't state a reference.
inorganic-chemistry transition-metals oxidation-state reference-request electronegativity
edited May 17 at 22:15
orthocresol♦
41.1k7124255
asked May 17 at 20:08
M.O.M.O.
1036
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A long time ago I was researching the effect of the self regulatory response in Fe and Co. I found that my results made sense based on the idea of the electronegativity of the ions considered. I found a webpage that listed the relationship between the different electronegativities for different oxidation states of Fe and Co.
My problem is I didn't save the webpage and I don't know where I found it. I am not a chemist so I don't know in which kind of books I could find a list of values of electronegativities for different oxidized ions.
It basically said that the relationship between the electronegativities was something like
$$ceCo^2+ < ceFe^2+ < ceFe^3+ < ceCo^3+$$
Note: I don't remember it well, so what I wrote could be lies. The important thing was that there was a flip of order in electronegativities for Fe and Co when changing oxidation state.
Does anyone know where I could find that kind of information? I tried googling, but I am not finding the webpage and don't remember the terms I used to find it in the first place.
I never understood the why of the order either, and I have seen chemist webpages that tell you which ion is more electronegative by just looking at it. If someone could explain that too I would appreciate it.
Edit:
I forgot to add that it was in octahedral complexes. I was able to find this pdf online (page 32) but it doesn't state a reference.
inorganic-chemistry transition-metals oxidation-state reference-request electronegativity
edited May 17 at 22:15
orthocresol♦
41.1k7124255
asked May 17 at 20:08
M.O.M.O.
1036
$endgroup$
A long time ago I was researching the effect of the self regulatory response in Fe and Co. I found that my results made sense based on the idea of the electronegativity of the ions considered. I found a webpage that listed the relationship between the different electronegativities for different oxidation states of Fe and Co.
My problem is I didn't save the webpage and I don't know where I found it. I am not a chemist so I don't know in which kind of books I could find a list of values of electronegativities for different oxidized ions.
It basically said that the relationship between the electronegativities was something like
$$ceCo^2+ < ceFe^2+ < ceFe^3+ < ceCo^3+$$
Note: I don't remember it well, so what I wrote could be lies. The important thing was that there was a flip of order in electronegativities for Fe and Co when changing oxidation state.
Does anyone know where I could find that kind of information? I tried googling, but I am not finding the webpage and don't remember the terms I used to find it in the first place.
I never understood the why of the order either, and I have seen chemist webpages that tell you which ion is more electronegative by just looking at it. If someone could explain that too I would appreciate it.
Edit:
I forgot to add that it was in octahedral complexes. I was able to find this pdf online (page 32) but it doesn't state a reference.
inorganic-chemistry transition-metals oxidation-state reference-request electronegativity
inorganic-chemistry transition-metals oxidation-state reference-request electronegativity
edited May 17 at 22:15
orthocresol♦
41.1k7124255
asked May 17 at 20:08
M.O.M.O.
1036
edited May 17 at 22:15
orthocresol♦
41.1k7124255
asked May 17 at 20:08
M.O.M.O.
1036
edited May 17 at 22:15
orthocresol♦
41.1k7124255
edited May 17 at 22:15
orthocresol♦
41.1k7124255
edited May 17 at 22:15
orthocresol♦
41.1k7124255
41.1k7124255
asked May 17 at 20:08
M.O.M.O.
1036
asked May 17 at 20:08
M.O.M.O.
1036
asked May 17 at 20:08
M.O.M.O.
1036
1036
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Pearson conveniently lists cumulative experimental data in the 1988 paper [1], referrring to the earlier work of Moore [2].
Selected values of $I$ (ionization potential), $A$ (electron affinity), $χ$ (absolute electronegativity – probably, that's what you are looking for) and $η$ (absolute hardness) for iron and cobalt cations are:
Table I. Experimental Parameters for Monatomic Cations (eV)
$$
beginarraylcccc
hline
textion & I & A & χ & η \
hline
ceFe^2+ & 30.65 & 16.18 & 23.42 & 7.24 \
ceFe^3+ & 54.8 & 30.65 & 42.73 & 12.08 \
ceCo^2+ & 33.50 & 17.06 & 25.28 & 8.22 \
ceCo^3+ & 51.3 & 33.50 & 42.4 & 8.9 \
hline
endarray
$$
So it looks like the relation is a bit different:
$$ceFe^2+ < ceCo^2+ < ceCo^3+ < ceFe^3+$$
Complete table as a screenshot:
References
- Pearson, R. G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorganic Chemistry 1988, 27 (4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00277a030.
- Moore, C. E. "Ionization Potentials and Ionization Limits"; Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.); 1970, NSRDS-NBS 34. (NIST - PDF)
answered May 17 at 20:48
andselisk♦andselisk
20.9k773141
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
May 17 at 21:34
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
May 17 at 21:41
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115469%2freference-for-electronegativities-of-different-metal-oxidation-states%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Pearson conveniently lists cumulative experimental data in the 1988 paper [1], referrring to the earlier work of Moore [2].
Selected values of $I$ (ionization potential), $A$ (electron affinity), $χ$ (absolute electronegativity – probably, that's what you are looking for) and $η$ (absolute hardness) for iron and cobalt cations are:
Table I. Experimental Parameters for Monatomic Cations (eV)
$$
beginarraylcccc
hline
textion & I & A & χ & η \
hline
ceFe^2+ & 30.65 & 16.18 & 23.42 & 7.24 \
ceFe^3+ & 54.8 & 30.65 & 42.73 & 12.08 \
ceCo^2+ & 33.50 & 17.06 & 25.28 & 8.22 \
ceCo^3+ & 51.3 & 33.50 & 42.4 & 8.9 \
hline
endarray
$$
So it looks like the relation is a bit different:
$$ceFe^2+ < ceCo^2+ < ceCo^3+ < ceFe^3+$$
Complete table as a screenshot:
References
- Pearson, R. G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorganic Chemistry 1988, 27 (4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00277a030.
- Moore, C. E. "Ionization Potentials and Ionization Limits"; Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.); 1970, NSRDS-NBS 34. (NIST - PDF)
answered May 17 at 20:48
andselisk♦andselisk
20.9k773141
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
May 17 at 21:34
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
May 17 at 21:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pearson conveniently lists cumulative experimental data in the 1988 paper [1], referrring to the earlier work of Moore [2].
Selected values of $I$ (ionization potential), $A$ (electron affinity), $χ$ (absolute electronegativity – probably, that's what you are looking for) and $η$ (absolute hardness) for iron and cobalt cations are:
Table I. Experimental Parameters for Monatomic Cations (eV)
$$
beginarraylcccc
hline
textion & I & A & χ & η \
hline
ceFe^2+ & 30.65 & 16.18 & 23.42 & 7.24 \
ceFe^3+ & 54.8 & 30.65 & 42.73 & 12.08 \
ceCo^2+ & 33.50 & 17.06 & 25.28 & 8.22 \
ceCo^3+ & 51.3 & 33.50 & 42.4 & 8.9 \
hline
endarray
$$
So it looks like the relation is a bit different:
$$ceFe^2+ < ceCo^2+ < ceCo^3+ < ceFe^3+$$
Complete table as a screenshot:
References
- Pearson, R. G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorganic Chemistry 1988, 27 (4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00277a030.
- Moore, C. E. "Ionization Potentials and Ionization Limits"; Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.); 1970, NSRDS-NBS 34. (NIST - PDF)
answered May 17 at 20:48
andselisk♦andselisk
20.9k773141
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
May 17 at 21:34
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
May 17 at 21:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pearson conveniently lists cumulative experimental data in the 1988 paper [1], referrring to the earlier work of Moore [2].
Selected values of $I$ (ionization potential), $A$ (electron affinity), $χ$ (absolute electronegativity – probably, that's what you are looking for) and $η$ (absolute hardness) for iron and cobalt cations are:
Table I. Experimental Parameters for Monatomic Cations (eV)
$$
beginarraylcccc
hline
textion & I & A & χ & η \
hline
ceFe^2+ & 30.65 & 16.18 & 23.42 & 7.24 \
ceFe^3+ & 54.8 & 30.65 & 42.73 & 12.08 \
ceCo^2+ & 33.50 & 17.06 & 25.28 & 8.22 \
ceCo^3+ & 51.3 & 33.50 & 42.4 & 8.9 \
hline
endarray
$$
So it looks like the relation is a bit different:
$$ceFe^2+ < ceCo^2+ < ceCo^3+ < ceFe^3+$$
Complete table as a screenshot:
References
- Pearson, R. G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorganic Chemistry 1988, 27 (4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00277a030.
- Moore, C. E. "Ionization Potentials and Ionization Limits"; Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.); 1970, NSRDS-NBS 34. (NIST - PDF)
answered May 17 at 20:48
andselisk♦andselisk
20.9k773141
$endgroup$
Pearson conveniently lists cumulative experimental data in the 1988 paper [1], referrring to the earlier work of Moore [2].
Selected values of $I$ (ionization potential), $A$ (electron affinity), $χ$ (absolute electronegativity – probably, that's what you are looking for) and $η$ (absolute hardness) for iron and cobalt cations are:
Table I. Experimental Parameters for Monatomic Cations (eV)
$$
beginarraylcccc
hline
textion & I & A & χ & η \
hline
ceFe^2+ & 30.65 & 16.18 & 23.42 & 7.24 \
ceFe^3+ & 54.8 & 30.65 & 42.73 & 12.08 \
ceCo^2+ & 33.50 & 17.06 & 25.28 & 8.22 \
ceCo^3+ & 51.3 & 33.50 & 42.4 & 8.9 \
hline
endarray
$$
So it looks like the relation is a bit different:
$$ceFe^2+ < ceCo^2+ < ceCo^3+ < ceFe^3+$$
Complete table as a screenshot:
References
- Pearson, R. G. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorganic Chemistry 1988, 27 (4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00277a030.
- Moore, C. E. "Ionization Potentials and Ionization Limits"; Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S. Natl. Bur. Stand.); 1970, NSRDS-NBS 34. (NIST - PDF)
answered May 17 at 20:48
andselisk♦andselisk
20.9k773141
edited May 17 at 20:57
answered May 17 at 20:48
andselisk♦andselisk
20.9k773141
answered May 17 at 20:48
andselisk♦andselisk
20.9k773141
answered May 17 at 20:48
andselisk♦andselisk
20.9k773141
20.9k773141
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
May 17 at 21:34
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
May 17 at 21:41
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
May 17 at 21:34
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
May 17 at 21:41
1
1
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
May 17 at 21:34
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! The odd thing is that it is contrary to what I remember finding. I think because my case was applied to octahedral complexes but I didn't really know if it made a difference so I didn't mention it in the question. I was just able to find a resource online. I will edit the question to add the image. I will accept your answer later today if no one else answers for taking the time to do so. Sorry for not putting all the information straight away. Hope you can clarify maybe with just the origin of the difference.
$endgroup$
– M.O.
May 17 at 21:34
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
May 17 at 21:41
$begingroup$
@M.O. No prob, I'm glad you found the data you were looking for. AFAIK the values for $χ$ are determined spectroscopically, so, yes, the coordination environment may affect the order since the difference in energies for the same oxidation number is relatively small.
$endgroup$
– andselisk♦
May 17 at 21:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115469%2freference-for-electronegativities-of-different-metal-oxidation-states%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
