multiple virtual-hosts on apache2.4 getting AH00959 : ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker (host) for 60sapache log analysis tools for multiple virtual hosts?Performance implications of multiple Virtual Hosts in Apache?OSX Apache2 Virtual Hosts Proxy IssueHow to configure multiple apache virtual hosts on multiple ports?reverse proxy on apache for a single virtual hostHow can I monitor resource usage for PHP sites on a per-virtual-host basis on GNU/Linux?Ubuntu Apache Virtual Hosts directing to wrong directory?Only first Reverse Proxy Virtual Host worksNginx Multiple Virtual Hosts ConfigurationsApache is taking requests for all subdomains leading always to the same virtual host
Layout of complex table
How to positively portray high and mighty characters?
Why is the Turkish president's surname spelt in Russian as Эрдоган, with г?
How can Charles Proxy change settings without admin rights after first time?
Does anycast addressing add additional latency in any way?
Going to get married soon, should I do it on Dec 31 or Jan 1?
Ending: accusative or not?
Do sudoku answers always have a single minimal clue set?
Syntax Error with 'if'
Using “sparkling” as a diminutive of “spark” in a poem
Every infinite linearly ordered set has two disjoint infinite subsets
How to append a matrix element by element?
First-year PhD giving a talk among well-established researchers in the field
Is there a short way to compare many values mutually at same time without using multiple 'and's?
Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?
A player is constantly pestering me about rules, what do I do as a DM?
Does the UK have a written constitution?
Links to webpages in books
What are the penalties for overstaying in USA?
Does Hubble need to dump momentum of its reaction wheels?
Cascading Repair Costs following Blown Head Gasket on a 2004 Subaru Outback
Calculating the partial sum of a expl3 sequence
Using symmetry of Riemann tensor to vanish components
How come I was asked by a CBP officer why I was in the US?
multiple virtual-hosts on apache2.4 getting AH00959 : ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker (host) for 60s
apache log analysis tools for multiple virtual hosts?Performance implications of multiple Virtual Hosts in Apache?OSX Apache2 Virtual Hosts Proxy IssueHow to configure multiple apache virtual hosts on multiple ports?reverse proxy on apache for a single virtual hostHow can I monitor resource usage for PHP sites on a per-virtual-host basis on GNU/Linux?Ubuntu Apache Virtual Hosts directing to wrong directory?Only first Reverse Proxy Virtual Host worksNginx Multiple Virtual Hosts ConfigurationsApache is taking requests for all subdomains leading always to the same virtual host
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
We have multiple virtual hosts configured for Apache2.4 on Win 2012 server.
If one of the ports is raising AH00959: ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker (host) for 60s
will it block Apache from serving any requests being sent to other ports at the same time-slot?
apache-2.4 virtualhost
add a comment |
We have multiple virtual hosts configured for Apache2.4 on Win 2012 server.
If one of the ports is raising AH00959: ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker (host) for 60s
will it block Apache from serving any requests being sent to other ports at the same time-slot?
apache-2.4 virtualhost
add a comment |
We have multiple virtual hosts configured for Apache2.4 on Win 2012 server.
If one of the ports is raising AH00959: ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker (host) for 60s
will it block Apache from serving any requests being sent to other ports at the same time-slot?
apache-2.4 virtualhost
We have multiple virtual hosts configured for Apache2.4 on Win 2012 server.
If one of the ports is raising AH00959: ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker (host) for 60s
will it block Apache from serving any requests being sent to other ports at the same time-slot?
apache-2.4 virtualhost
apache-2.4 virtualhost
asked Aug 3 '16 at 9:27
Joshua BabooJoshua Baboo
1063 bronze badges
1063 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
As long as each virtual host has its own ProxyPass (or RewriteRule with [P] flag) then no.
When Apache sends a request to a back-end server and it fails (normally because of a 500 error or the inability to get a connection at all), Apache marks that connection (called a worker), and only that connection, as down and you get the message you posted. Apache will then not use that connection for a certain length of time (default 60 seconds).
Any other connection as defined by any other ProxyPass directive should continue to work. I've not tried the situation where two vhosts have exactly the same ProxyPass directive and so I'm not sure if that creates 2 independent workers or not, but it would be easy to test.
This length of time Apache waits before retrying the connection is controlled by the "retry" option to the ProxyPass directive
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f793568%2fmultiple-virtual-hosts-on-apache2-4-getting-ah00959-ap-proxy-connect-backend-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As long as each virtual host has its own ProxyPass (or RewriteRule with [P] flag) then no.
When Apache sends a request to a back-end server and it fails (normally because of a 500 error or the inability to get a connection at all), Apache marks that connection (called a worker), and only that connection, as down and you get the message you posted. Apache will then not use that connection for a certain length of time (default 60 seconds).
Any other connection as defined by any other ProxyPass directive should continue to work. I've not tried the situation where two vhosts have exactly the same ProxyPass directive and so I'm not sure if that creates 2 independent workers or not, but it would be easy to test.
This length of time Apache waits before retrying the connection is controlled by the "retry" option to the ProxyPass directive
add a comment |
As long as each virtual host has its own ProxyPass (or RewriteRule with [P] flag) then no.
When Apache sends a request to a back-end server and it fails (normally because of a 500 error or the inability to get a connection at all), Apache marks that connection (called a worker), and only that connection, as down and you get the message you posted. Apache will then not use that connection for a certain length of time (default 60 seconds).
Any other connection as defined by any other ProxyPass directive should continue to work. I've not tried the situation where two vhosts have exactly the same ProxyPass directive and so I'm not sure if that creates 2 independent workers or not, but it would be easy to test.
This length of time Apache waits before retrying the connection is controlled by the "retry" option to the ProxyPass directive
add a comment |
As long as each virtual host has its own ProxyPass (or RewriteRule with [P] flag) then no.
When Apache sends a request to a back-end server and it fails (normally because of a 500 error or the inability to get a connection at all), Apache marks that connection (called a worker), and only that connection, as down and you get the message you posted. Apache will then not use that connection for a certain length of time (default 60 seconds).
Any other connection as defined by any other ProxyPass directive should continue to work. I've not tried the situation where two vhosts have exactly the same ProxyPass directive and so I'm not sure if that creates 2 independent workers or not, but it would be easy to test.
This length of time Apache waits before retrying the connection is controlled by the "retry" option to the ProxyPass directive
As long as each virtual host has its own ProxyPass (or RewriteRule with [P] flag) then no.
When Apache sends a request to a back-end server and it fails (normally because of a 500 error or the inability to get a connection at all), Apache marks that connection (called a worker), and only that connection, as down and you get the message you posted. Apache will then not use that connection for a certain length of time (default 60 seconds).
Any other connection as defined by any other ProxyPass directive should continue to work. I've not tried the situation where two vhosts have exactly the same ProxyPass directive and so I'm not sure if that creates 2 independent workers or not, but it would be easy to test.
This length of time Apache waits before retrying the connection is controlled by the "retry" option to the ProxyPass directive
answered Aug 22 '16 at 14:25
UnbelieverUnbeliever
1,7611 gold badge4 silver badges15 bronze badges
1,7611 gold badge4 silver badges15 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f793568%2fmultiple-virtual-hosts-on-apache2-4-getting-ah00959-ap-proxy-connect-backend-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown