Cacti Graphing incorrect load averagesCacti measuring Apache bandwidthCacti - How can you get a list of systems that meet certain criteria?Cacti Graphing CPU / Memory utilization over timeNagios graphing solutions vs Munin/Cacti/GangliaDegraded httpd performance after moving from RHEL 5.6 to 6.1Cacti totals graph values incorrectlyGraphing increase in value in cactiCacti not working for SNMP data sourcesCacti Graphing not workingCacti gets data but does not show a graph

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

How to determine what difficulty is right for the game?

dbcc cleantable batch size explanation

Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Does detail obscure or enhance action?

Important Resources for Dark Age Civilizations?

A case of the sniffles

What does the "remote control" for a QF-4 look like?

Why can't I see bouncing of switch on oscilloscope screen?

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

Arrow those variables!

What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?

Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?

Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

NMaximize is not converging to a solution

Does an object always see its latest internal state irrespective of thread?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?

Do other languages have an "irreversible aspect"?



Cacti Graphing incorrect load averages


Cacti measuring Apache bandwidthCacti - How can you get a list of systems that meet certain criteria?Cacti Graphing CPU / Memory utilization over timeNagios graphing solutions vs Munin/Cacti/GangliaDegraded httpd performance after moving from RHEL 5.6 to 6.1Cacti totals graph values incorrectlyGraphing increase in value in cactiCacti not working for SNMP data sourcesCacti Graphing not workingCacti gets data but does not show a graph






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








5















I've just set up cacti to monitor CPU and memory usage on a server that I think needs to be upgraded, but to be able to make my case for funding I need hard facts.



I figured getting Cacti to monitor the Memory usage and Load Average would do the trick, but the graph being generated seems to bear no correlation to reality.



According to top my load average right now is hovering at around 5, but cacti is graphing it at 0.1!



How can I get cacti to monitor the real load averages on the server? The server to be monitored is running RHEL5 and using net-SNMP as the SNMP deamon.



Thanks,



Bart.










share|improve this question




























    5















    I've just set up cacti to monitor CPU and memory usage on a server that I think needs to be upgraded, but to be able to make my case for funding I need hard facts.



    I figured getting Cacti to monitor the Memory usage and Load Average would do the trick, but the graph being generated seems to bear no correlation to reality.



    According to top my load average right now is hovering at around 5, but cacti is graphing it at 0.1!



    How can I get cacti to monitor the real load averages on the server? The server to be monitored is running RHEL5 and using net-SNMP as the SNMP deamon.



    Thanks,



    Bart.










    share|improve this question
























      5












      5








      5








      I've just set up cacti to monitor CPU and memory usage on a server that I think needs to be upgraded, but to be able to make my case for funding I need hard facts.



      I figured getting Cacti to monitor the Memory usage and Load Average would do the trick, but the graph being generated seems to bear no correlation to reality.



      According to top my load average right now is hovering at around 5, but cacti is graphing it at 0.1!



      How can I get cacti to monitor the real load averages on the server? The server to be monitored is running RHEL5 and using net-SNMP as the SNMP deamon.



      Thanks,



      Bart.










      share|improve this question














      I've just set up cacti to monitor CPU and memory usage on a server that I think needs to be upgraded, but to be able to make my case for funding I need hard facts.



      I figured getting Cacti to monitor the Memory usage and Load Average would do the trick, but the graph being generated seems to bear no correlation to reality.



      According to top my load average right now is hovering at around 5, but cacti is graphing it at 0.1!



      How can I get cacti to monitor the real load averages on the server? The server to be monitored is running RHEL5 and using net-SNMP as the SNMP deamon.



      Thanks,



      Bart.







      linux monitoring central-processing-unit performance-monitoring cacti






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Sep 30 '09 at 16:22









      Bart BBart B

      2,46652240




      2,46652240




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          You might want to look at Munin, which is very easy to setup, especially if you're just running it locally. It will let you quickly start tracking CPU load and other resources without having to mess with SNMP and remotely grabbing resource data. There are packages for RedHat that should be quite simple to install.






          share|improve this answer






























            5














            cacti has a bad default graph which stacks the 3 values from load average. The total is meaningless, and that is what you are deceived into looking at. Change the default graph to use lines rather than stack and you'll see something better.






            share|improve this answer






























              3














              Bear in mind that load (e.g. /proc/loadavg) can be averaged on different intervals (tipically 1, 5 and 15 minutes). Add the fact that averaging these figures once again over a time series tends to lower the overall indicator, and you may have a hard time making your case for getting an upgrade.



              I suggest you stop thinking on a technical solution and start building a business case around a different indicator, preferrably one that has a correlation to an economic or customer satisfaction indicator -- e.g. maximum response time. Most likely this will get your message through to the people that manages the money.






              share|improve this answer






























                0














                I'd like to add to @labradort's answer.



                I'm assuming you're talking about the ucd/net - Load Average template. The reason for wrong values is that it displays 1/5/15 averages separately, and then adds them together. The values are technically correct, but look weird. This is how you would correct the issue:



                Go to Graph Templates, and select the checkbox right of ucd/net - Load Average.



                Scroll down, choose 'Duplicate' as an action (NOT DELETE) and click Go.



                enter image description here



                Choose a name for your new template, example ucd/net - Alternative Load Average.



                Still in the Graph Templates section, click on the hyperlink of your new template to edit it.



                Click on 'Item # 3'. Change 'Graph Item Type' from STACK to LINE1, then click save.

                Repeat this for 'Item # 5'.



                Delete 'Item # 7': '(No Task): Total'



                The final edit should look something like this:
                enter image description here



                Click save when done.



                This will make your 1 minute average a semi-transparent block, with your longer averages neatly trailing behind. The final result looks like this:
                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer























                  Your Answer








                  StackExchange.ready(function()
                  var channelOptions =
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "2"
                  ;
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                  createEditor();
                  );

                  else
                  createEditor();

                  );

                  function createEditor()
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                  convertImagesToLinks: true,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: 10,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader:
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  ,
                  onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  );



                  );













                  draft saved

                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function ()
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f70035%2fcacti-graphing-incorrect-load-averages%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown

























                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  1














                  You might want to look at Munin, which is very easy to setup, especially if you're just running it locally. It will let you quickly start tracking CPU load and other resources without having to mess with SNMP and remotely grabbing resource data. There are packages for RedHat that should be quite simple to install.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    1














                    You might want to look at Munin, which is very easy to setup, especially if you're just running it locally. It will let you quickly start tracking CPU load and other resources without having to mess with SNMP and remotely grabbing resource data. There are packages for RedHat that should be quite simple to install.






                    share|improve this answer

























                      1












                      1








                      1







                      You might want to look at Munin, which is very easy to setup, especially if you're just running it locally. It will let you quickly start tracking CPU load and other resources without having to mess with SNMP and remotely grabbing resource data. There are packages for RedHat that should be quite simple to install.






                      share|improve this answer













                      You might want to look at Munin, which is very easy to setup, especially if you're just running it locally. It will let you quickly start tracking CPU load and other resources without having to mess with SNMP and remotely grabbing resource data. There are packages for RedHat that should be quite simple to install.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Sep 30 '09 at 19:57









                      Jason AbateJason Abate

                      43133




                      43133























                          5














                          cacti has a bad default graph which stacks the 3 values from load average. The total is meaningless, and that is what you are deceived into looking at. Change the default graph to use lines rather than stack and you'll see something better.






                          share|improve this answer



























                            5














                            cacti has a bad default graph which stacks the 3 values from load average. The total is meaningless, and that is what you are deceived into looking at. Change the default graph to use lines rather than stack and you'll see something better.






                            share|improve this answer

























                              5












                              5








                              5







                              cacti has a bad default graph which stacks the 3 values from load average. The total is meaningless, and that is what you are deceived into looking at. Change the default graph to use lines rather than stack and you'll see something better.






                              share|improve this answer













                              cacti has a bad default graph which stacks the 3 values from load average. The total is meaningless, and that is what you are deceived into looking at. Change the default graph to use lines rather than stack and you'll see something better.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Oct 28 '09 at 12:46









                              labradortlabradort

                              1,0841819




                              1,0841819





















                                  3














                                  Bear in mind that load (e.g. /proc/loadavg) can be averaged on different intervals (tipically 1, 5 and 15 minutes). Add the fact that averaging these figures once again over a time series tends to lower the overall indicator, and you may have a hard time making your case for getting an upgrade.



                                  I suggest you stop thinking on a technical solution and start building a business case around a different indicator, preferrably one that has a correlation to an economic or customer satisfaction indicator -- e.g. maximum response time. Most likely this will get your message through to the people that manages the money.






                                  share|improve this answer



























                                    3














                                    Bear in mind that load (e.g. /proc/loadavg) can be averaged on different intervals (tipically 1, 5 and 15 minutes). Add the fact that averaging these figures once again over a time series tends to lower the overall indicator, and you may have a hard time making your case for getting an upgrade.



                                    I suggest you stop thinking on a technical solution and start building a business case around a different indicator, preferrably one that has a correlation to an economic or customer satisfaction indicator -- e.g. maximum response time. Most likely this will get your message through to the people that manages the money.






                                    share|improve this answer

























                                      3












                                      3








                                      3







                                      Bear in mind that load (e.g. /proc/loadavg) can be averaged on different intervals (tipically 1, 5 and 15 minutes). Add the fact that averaging these figures once again over a time series tends to lower the overall indicator, and you may have a hard time making your case for getting an upgrade.



                                      I suggest you stop thinking on a technical solution and start building a business case around a different indicator, preferrably one that has a correlation to an economic or customer satisfaction indicator -- e.g. maximum response time. Most likely this will get your message through to the people that manages the money.






                                      share|improve this answer













                                      Bear in mind that load (e.g. /proc/loadavg) can be averaged on different intervals (tipically 1, 5 and 15 minutes). Add the fact that averaging these figures once again over a time series tends to lower the overall indicator, and you may have a hard time making your case for getting an upgrade.



                                      I suggest you stop thinking on a technical solution and start building a business case around a different indicator, preferrably one that has a correlation to an economic or customer satisfaction indicator -- e.g. maximum response time. Most likely this will get your message through to the people that manages the money.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Sep 30 '09 at 21:42









                                      codeheadcodehead

                                      89856




                                      89856





















                                          0














                                          I'd like to add to @labradort's answer.



                                          I'm assuming you're talking about the ucd/net - Load Average template. The reason for wrong values is that it displays 1/5/15 averages separately, and then adds them together. The values are technically correct, but look weird. This is how you would correct the issue:



                                          Go to Graph Templates, and select the checkbox right of ucd/net - Load Average.



                                          Scroll down, choose 'Duplicate' as an action (NOT DELETE) and click Go.



                                          enter image description here



                                          Choose a name for your new template, example ucd/net - Alternative Load Average.



                                          Still in the Graph Templates section, click on the hyperlink of your new template to edit it.



                                          Click on 'Item # 3'. Change 'Graph Item Type' from STACK to LINE1, then click save.

                                          Repeat this for 'Item # 5'.



                                          Delete 'Item # 7': '(No Task): Total'



                                          The final edit should look something like this:
                                          enter image description here



                                          Click save when done.



                                          This will make your 1 minute average a semi-transparent block, with your longer averages neatly trailing behind. The final result looks like this:
                                          enter image description here






                                          share|improve this answer



























                                            0














                                            I'd like to add to @labradort's answer.



                                            I'm assuming you're talking about the ucd/net - Load Average template. The reason for wrong values is that it displays 1/5/15 averages separately, and then adds them together. The values are technically correct, but look weird. This is how you would correct the issue:



                                            Go to Graph Templates, and select the checkbox right of ucd/net - Load Average.



                                            Scroll down, choose 'Duplicate' as an action (NOT DELETE) and click Go.



                                            enter image description here



                                            Choose a name for your new template, example ucd/net - Alternative Load Average.



                                            Still in the Graph Templates section, click on the hyperlink of your new template to edit it.



                                            Click on 'Item # 3'. Change 'Graph Item Type' from STACK to LINE1, then click save.

                                            Repeat this for 'Item # 5'.



                                            Delete 'Item # 7': '(No Task): Total'



                                            The final edit should look something like this:
                                            enter image description here



                                            Click save when done.



                                            This will make your 1 minute average a semi-transparent block, with your longer averages neatly trailing behind. The final result looks like this:
                                            enter image description here






                                            share|improve this answer

























                                              0












                                              0








                                              0







                                              I'd like to add to @labradort's answer.



                                              I'm assuming you're talking about the ucd/net - Load Average template. The reason for wrong values is that it displays 1/5/15 averages separately, and then adds them together. The values are technically correct, but look weird. This is how you would correct the issue:



                                              Go to Graph Templates, and select the checkbox right of ucd/net - Load Average.



                                              Scroll down, choose 'Duplicate' as an action (NOT DELETE) and click Go.



                                              enter image description here



                                              Choose a name for your new template, example ucd/net - Alternative Load Average.



                                              Still in the Graph Templates section, click on the hyperlink of your new template to edit it.



                                              Click on 'Item # 3'. Change 'Graph Item Type' from STACK to LINE1, then click save.

                                              Repeat this for 'Item # 5'.



                                              Delete 'Item # 7': '(No Task): Total'



                                              The final edit should look something like this:
                                              enter image description here



                                              Click save when done.



                                              This will make your 1 minute average a semi-transparent block, with your longer averages neatly trailing behind. The final result looks like this:
                                              enter image description here






                                              share|improve this answer













                                              I'd like to add to @labradort's answer.



                                              I'm assuming you're talking about the ucd/net - Load Average template. The reason for wrong values is that it displays 1/5/15 averages separately, and then adds them together. The values are technically correct, but look weird. This is how you would correct the issue:



                                              Go to Graph Templates, and select the checkbox right of ucd/net - Load Average.



                                              Scroll down, choose 'Duplicate' as an action (NOT DELETE) and click Go.



                                              enter image description here



                                              Choose a name for your new template, example ucd/net - Alternative Load Average.



                                              Still in the Graph Templates section, click on the hyperlink of your new template to edit it.



                                              Click on 'Item # 3'. Change 'Graph Item Type' from STACK to LINE1, then click save.

                                              Repeat this for 'Item # 5'.



                                              Delete 'Item # 7': '(No Task): Total'



                                              The final edit should look something like this:
                                              enter image description here



                                              Click save when done.



                                              This will make your 1 minute average a semi-transparent block, with your longer averages neatly trailing behind. The final result looks like this:
                                              enter image description here







                                              share|improve this answer












                                              share|improve this answer



                                              share|improve this answer










                                              answered Apr 2 at 21:39









                                              aggregate1166877aggregate1166877

                                              1012




                                              1012



























                                                  draft saved

                                                  draft discarded
















































                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid


                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function ()
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f70035%2fcacti-graphing-incorrect-load-averages%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest















                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

                                                  Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

                                                  What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company