Perfect Forward Secrecy is mandatory to create new keys in ikev2? [closed]Pfsense 2.02 unstable ipsec vpn.Tunnels will come up upon restarting racconSimultaneous IKEv1 and IKEv2 connection support in StrongswanHow can I connect to a Cisco ASA5540 from Windows Server 2012 over IPSEC?Accounting IPSec connections with RSA authenticationSetting up IPSEC on LAN between two hosts (OpenBSD)Can't establish site to site vpn connection between Cisco 3900 and strongSwan clientSite to Site IPSec between pfSense and Cisco ASAHow to limit bandwidth per VPN connection?How to configure strongswan peer-to-peer vpn tunnel using public IP as encryption domain?Is strongSwan eap-mschapv2 authentication secure vs using certs?
Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
How can I place the product on a social media post better?
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?
Binary Numbers Magic Trick
Does Gita support doctrine of eternal samsara?
How can I practically buy stocks?
Will a top journal at least read my introduction?
a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat
Is there a way to get a compiler for the original B programming language?
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
Please, smoke with good manners
What happened to Captain America in Endgame?
Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?
How to get a plain text file version of a CP/M .BAS (M-BASIC) program?
Does holding a wand and speaking its command word count as V/S/M spell components?
How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?
How to solve constants out of the internal energy equation?
With a Canadian student visa, can I spend a night at Vancouver before continuing to Toronto?
Why other Westeros houses don't use wildfire?
How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?
Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?
Perfect Forward Secrecy is mandatory to create new keys in ikev2? [closed]
Pfsense 2.02 unstable ipsec vpn.Tunnels will come up upon restarting racconSimultaneous IKEv1 and IKEv2 connection support in StrongswanHow can I connect to a Cisco ASA5540 from Windows Server 2012 over IPSEC?Accounting IPSec connections with RSA authenticationSetting up IPSEC on LAN between two hosts (OpenBSD)Can't establish site to site vpn connection between Cisco 3900 and strongSwan clientSite to Site IPSec between pfSense and Cisco ASAHow to limit bandwidth per VPN connection?How to configure strongswan peer-to-peer vpn tunnel using public IP as encryption domain?Is strongSwan eap-mschapv2 authentication secure vs using certs?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I am studying about IKev2 and ipsec and I saw that "PFS guarantees that the encryption keys for IPsec SA negotiations are created separately for each negotiation." but I and dont want to use PFS how will the keys be created ? and PFS garantue that the new key is not equal a key created before ?
Thanks a lot
cisco ipsec site-to-site-vpn ikev2 ikev1
asked Apr 20 at 16:09
Helder JúniorHelder Júnior
12
closed as off-topic by ceejayoz, womble♦ Apr 20 at 21:31
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions on Server Fault must be about managing information technology systems in a business environment. Home and end-user computing questions may be asked on Super User, and questions about development, testing and development tools may be asked on Stack Overflow." – ceejayoz, womble
add a comment |
I am studying about IKev2 and ipsec and I saw that "PFS guarantees that the encryption keys for IPsec SA negotiations are created separately for each negotiation." but I and dont want to use PFS how will the keys be created ? and PFS garantue that the new key is not equal a key created before ?
Thanks a lot
cisco ipsec site-to-site-vpn ikev2 ikev1
asked Apr 20 at 16:09
Helder JúniorHelder Júnior
12
closed as off-topic by ceejayoz, womble♦ Apr 20 at 21:31
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions on Server Fault must be about managing information technology systems in a business environment. Home and end-user computing questions may be asked on Super User, and questions about development, testing and development tools may be asked on Stack Overflow." – ceejayoz, womble
Why don't you want to use PFS?
– ceejayoz
Apr 20 at 16:24
I just answering a question from college , and the question is :"In IKE the creation of additional child SAs implies the exchange of additional CREATE_CHILD_SA messages. What is used to create the new keys in an expedited way if you do not need Perfect Forward Secrecy?" :)
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 16:34
I read that with PFS the parts of the communication forget all material used to generate the keys, thats guarantee a new key without be repeated with an old one,,,
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 17:04
add a comment |
I am studying about IKev2 and ipsec and I saw that "PFS guarantees that the encryption keys for IPsec SA negotiations are created separately for each negotiation." but I and dont want to use PFS how will the keys be created ? and PFS garantue that the new key is not equal a key created before ?
Thanks a lot
cisco ipsec site-to-site-vpn ikev2 ikev1
asked Apr 20 at 16:09
Helder JúniorHelder Júnior
12
I am studying about IKev2 and ipsec and I saw that "PFS guarantees that the encryption keys for IPsec SA negotiations are created separately for each negotiation." but I and dont want to use PFS how will the keys be created ? and PFS garantue that the new key is not equal a key created before ?
Thanks a lot
cisco ipsec site-to-site-vpn ikev2 ikev1
cisco ipsec site-to-site-vpn ikev2 ikev1
asked Apr 20 at 16:09
Helder JúniorHelder Júnior
12
asked Apr 20 at 16:09
Helder JúniorHelder Júnior
12
asked Apr 20 at 16:09
Helder JúniorHelder Júnior
12
asked Apr 20 at 16:09
Helder JúniorHelder Júnior
12
asked Apr 20 at 16:09
Helder JúniorHelder Júnior
12
12
closed as off-topic by ceejayoz, womble♦ Apr 20 at 21:31
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions on Server Fault must be about managing information technology systems in a business environment. Home and end-user computing questions may be asked on Super User, and questions about development, testing and development tools may be asked on Stack Overflow." – ceejayoz, womble
closed as off-topic by ceejayoz, womble♦ Apr 20 at 21:31
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions on Server Fault must be about managing information technology systems in a business environment. Home and end-user computing questions may be asked on Super User, and questions about development, testing and development tools may be asked on Stack Overflow." – ceejayoz, womble
Why don't you want to use PFS?
– ceejayoz
Apr 20 at 16:24
I just answering a question from college , and the question is :"In IKE the creation of additional child SAs implies the exchange of additional CREATE_CHILD_SA messages. What is used to create the new keys in an expedited way if you do not need Perfect Forward Secrecy?" :)
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 16:34
I read that with PFS the parts of the communication forget all material used to generate the keys, thats guarantee a new key without be repeated with an old one,,,
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 17:04
add a comment |
Why don't you want to use PFS?
– ceejayoz
Apr 20 at 16:24
I just answering a question from college , and the question is :"In IKE the creation of additional child SAs implies the exchange of additional CREATE_CHILD_SA messages. What is used to create the new keys in an expedited way if you do not need Perfect Forward Secrecy?" :)
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 16:34
I read that with PFS the parts of the communication forget all material used to generate the keys, thats guarantee a new key without be repeated with an old one,,,
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 17:04
Why don't you want to use PFS?
– ceejayoz
Apr 20 at 16:24
Why don't you want to use PFS?
– ceejayoz
Apr 20 at 16:24
I just answering a question from college , and the question is :"In IKE the creation of additional child SAs implies the exchange of additional CREATE_CHILD_SA messages. What is used to create the new keys in an expedited way if you do not need Perfect Forward Secrecy?" :)
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 16:34
I just answering a question from college , and the question is :"In IKE the creation of additional child SAs implies the exchange of additional CREATE_CHILD_SA messages. What is used to create the new keys in an expedited way if you do not need Perfect Forward Secrecy?" :)
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 16:34
I read that with PFS the parts of the communication forget all material used to generate the keys, thats guarantee a new key without be repeated with an old one,,,
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 17:04
I read that with PFS the parts of the communication forget all material used to generate the keys, thats guarantee a new key without be repeated with an old one,,,
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 17:04
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Why don't you want to use PFS?
– ceejayoz
Apr 20 at 16:24
I just answering a question from college , and the question is :"In IKE the creation of additional child SAs implies the exchange of additional CREATE_CHILD_SA messages. What is used to create the new keys in an expedited way if you do not need Perfect Forward Secrecy?" :)
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 16:34
I read that with PFS the parts of the communication forget all material used to generate the keys, thats guarantee a new key without be repeated with an old one,,,
– Helder Júnior
Apr 20 at 17:04