Stop systemd units in different order than start Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!systemd: stop all uninstalled unitsHow to start and stop a systemd unit with another?systemd doesn't honour chkconfig KILL orderHow to stop systemd services in specific orderSpecify systemd dependency on any one of multiple units?Start and stop one systemd unit with anotherStart vsftpd instances by systemd targetSystemd units: [Install] vs. command: start (cloud-config)systemd state changes to “deactivating (stop-sigterm)” for unit with type=forkingsystemd: setting dependencies between templated timer units?
How long can equipment go unused before powering up runs the risk of damage?
Is there public access to the Meteor Crater in Arizona?
The Nth Gryphon Number
Intuitive explanation of the rank-nullity theorem
Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items
How many time has Arya actually used Needle?
How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics
Co-worker has annoying ringtone
Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?
Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?
What does Turing mean by this statement?
Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?
Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?
Karn the great creator - 'card from outside the game' in sealed
What do you call the main part of a joke?
Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?
Time evolution of a Gaussian wave packet, why convert to k-space?
Most bit efficient text communication method?
Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?
What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?
Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?
If the probability of a dog barking one or more times in a given hour is 84%, then what is the probability of a dog barking in 30 minutes?
How to save space when writing equations with cases?
Sum letters are not two different
Stop systemd units in different order than start
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!systemd: stop all uninstalled unitsHow to start and stop a systemd unit with another?systemd doesn't honour chkconfig KILL orderHow to stop systemd services in specific orderSpecify systemd dependency on any one of multiple units?Start and stop one systemd unit with anotherStart vsftpd instances by systemd targetSystemd units: [Install] vs. command: start (cloud-config)systemd state changes to “deactivating (stop-sigterm)” for unit with type=forkingsystemd: setting dependencies between templated timer units?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
How can I define two systemd units so their Stop order is different than their Start order ?
For performance issue, I have both units A and B start simultaneously (they both start after a systemd socket), but unit A cannot stop before unit B
systemd
New contributor
add a comment |
How can I define two systemd units so their Stop order is different than their Start order ?
For performance issue, I have both units A and B start simultaneously (they both start after a systemd socket), but unit A cannot stop before unit B
systemd
New contributor
Potentially you can useBindsTo
orRequires
to achieve this, but from your question it is unclear how exactly are you stopping the services. What exactly triggers the stopping of the services?
– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:54
They are both stopped when shuting the system down, so system sends a SIGTERM to both units at the same time
– aguadoe
Apr 15 at 13:40
add a comment |
How can I define two systemd units so their Stop order is different than their Start order ?
For performance issue, I have both units A and B start simultaneously (they both start after a systemd socket), but unit A cannot stop before unit B
systemd
New contributor
How can I define two systemd units so their Stop order is different than their Start order ?
For performance issue, I have both units A and B start simultaneously (they both start after a systemd socket), but unit A cannot stop before unit B
systemd
systemd
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Apr 14 at 10:55
aguadoeaguadoe
1031
1031
New contributor
New contributor
Potentially you can useBindsTo
orRequires
to achieve this, but from your question it is unclear how exactly are you stopping the services. What exactly triggers the stopping of the services?
– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:54
They are both stopped when shuting the system down, so system sends a SIGTERM to both units at the same time
– aguadoe
Apr 15 at 13:40
add a comment |
Potentially you can useBindsTo
orRequires
to achieve this, but from your question it is unclear how exactly are you stopping the services. What exactly triggers the stopping of the services?
– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:54
They are both stopped when shuting the system down, so system sends a SIGTERM to both units at the same time
– aguadoe
Apr 15 at 13:40
Potentially you can use
BindsTo
or Requires
to achieve this, but from your question it is unclear how exactly are you stopping the services. What exactly triggers the stopping of the services?– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:54
Potentially you can use
BindsTo
or Requires
to achieve this, but from your question it is unclear how exactly are you stopping the services. What exactly triggers the stopping of the services?– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:54
They are both stopped when shuting the system down, so system sends a SIGTERM to both units at the same time
– aguadoe
Apr 15 at 13:40
They are both stopped when shuting the system down, so system sends a SIGTERM to both units at the same time
– aguadoe
Apr 15 at 13:40
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Nope. If B contains After=A
, A starts first, and B stops first.
What the service manager waits for when starting A depends on the Type. Reference possible types in the systemd.service manual. In particular, simple
doesn't even wait for the exec(), but forking
waits for the parent process to exit.
If performance is what you are after, naturally there are multiple competing tools for timing the start of units, systemd-analyze and bootchart. Determine the maximum startup time you can tolerate, then measure how long it actually takes.
For further improvements, profile this thing in detail and look at its code.
the units can be linked withRequires=
orBindsTo=
. according to documentation, it does not fix the order in which services are started, but influences how they are stopped. (as in, stopping of one of them triggers the stopping of the other)
– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:56
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
aguadoe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f962979%2fstop-systemd-units-in-different-order-than-start%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Nope. If B contains After=A
, A starts first, and B stops first.
What the service manager waits for when starting A depends on the Type. Reference possible types in the systemd.service manual. In particular, simple
doesn't even wait for the exec(), but forking
waits for the parent process to exit.
If performance is what you are after, naturally there are multiple competing tools for timing the start of units, systemd-analyze and bootchart. Determine the maximum startup time you can tolerate, then measure how long it actually takes.
For further improvements, profile this thing in detail and look at its code.
the units can be linked withRequires=
orBindsTo=
. according to documentation, it does not fix the order in which services are started, but influences how they are stopped. (as in, stopping of one of them triggers the stopping of the other)
– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:56
add a comment |
Nope. If B contains After=A
, A starts first, and B stops first.
What the service manager waits for when starting A depends on the Type. Reference possible types in the systemd.service manual. In particular, simple
doesn't even wait for the exec(), but forking
waits for the parent process to exit.
If performance is what you are after, naturally there are multiple competing tools for timing the start of units, systemd-analyze and bootchart. Determine the maximum startup time you can tolerate, then measure how long it actually takes.
For further improvements, profile this thing in detail and look at its code.
the units can be linked withRequires=
orBindsTo=
. according to documentation, it does not fix the order in which services are started, but influences how they are stopped. (as in, stopping of one of them triggers the stopping of the other)
– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:56
add a comment |
Nope. If B contains After=A
, A starts first, and B stops first.
What the service manager waits for when starting A depends on the Type. Reference possible types in the systemd.service manual. In particular, simple
doesn't even wait for the exec(), but forking
waits for the parent process to exit.
If performance is what you are after, naturally there are multiple competing tools for timing the start of units, systemd-analyze and bootchart. Determine the maximum startup time you can tolerate, then measure how long it actually takes.
For further improvements, profile this thing in detail and look at its code.
Nope. If B contains After=A
, A starts first, and B stops first.
What the service manager waits for when starting A depends on the Type. Reference possible types in the systemd.service manual. In particular, simple
doesn't even wait for the exec(), but forking
waits for the parent process to exit.
If performance is what you are after, naturally there are multiple competing tools for timing the start of units, systemd-analyze and bootchart. Determine the maximum startup time you can tolerate, then measure how long it actually takes.
For further improvements, profile this thing in detail and look at its code.
answered Apr 14 at 12:15
John MahowaldJohn Mahowald
9,0111713
9,0111713
the units can be linked withRequires=
orBindsTo=
. according to documentation, it does not fix the order in which services are started, but influences how they are stopped. (as in, stopping of one of them triggers the stopping of the other)
– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:56
add a comment |
the units can be linked withRequires=
orBindsTo=
. according to documentation, it does not fix the order in which services are started, but influences how they are stopped. (as in, stopping of one of them triggers the stopping of the other)
– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:56
the units can be linked with
Requires=
or BindsTo=
. according to documentation, it does not fix the order in which services are started, but influences how they are stopped. (as in, stopping of one of them triggers the stopping of the other)– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:56
the units can be linked with
Requires=
or BindsTo=
. according to documentation, it does not fix the order in which services are started, but influences how they are stopped. (as in, stopping of one of them triggers the stopping of the other)– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:56
add a comment |
aguadoe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
aguadoe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
aguadoe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
aguadoe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f962979%2fstop-systemd-units-in-different-order-than-start%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Potentially you can use
BindsTo
orRequires
to achieve this, but from your question it is unclear how exactly are you stopping the services. What exactly triggers the stopping of the services?– Ektich
Apr 15 at 10:54
They are both stopped when shuting the system down, so system sends a SIGTERM to both units at the same time
– aguadoe
Apr 15 at 13:40