What is the domain of the function $f(x)=sqrt[3]x^3-x$? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)When should the antiderivative of a rational function be defined as a piecewise function?Domain of this functionWhat is the domain of the inverse functionDomain of the function and its simplified expressionIs this interval in the domain?Showing that $sum_n=2^infty f(frac 1n)$ converges using the MVTWhat does it mean for a function to be continuous on its domain?Finding the domain of $sqrtx^2-7$Maximum domain of definition of some $ln$ and $sqrtx$ functionNo Derivability at 0+ point, why not including 0 in function domain

What is the chair depicted in Cesare Maccari's 1889 painting "Cicerone denuncia Catilina"?

Co-worker has annoying ringtone

What's the point of the test set?

Tannaka duality for semisimple groups

AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network

How many time has Arya actually used Needle?

The Nth Gryphon Number

Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

Central Vacuuming: Is it worth it, and how does it compare to normal vacuuming?

Semigroups with no morphisms between them

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?

Why are vacuum tubes still used in amateur radios?

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

How can I set the aperture on my DSLR when it's attached to a telescope instead of a lens?

Is there public access to the Meteor Crater in Arizona?

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items

How to compare two different files line by line in unix?

If the probability of a dog barking one or more times in a given hour is 84%, then what is the probability of a dog barking in 30 minutes?

Would it be easier to apply for a UK visa if there is a host family to sponsor for you in going there?

What does this say in Elvish?

A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way

Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?



What is the domain of the function $f(x)=sqrt[3]x^3-x$?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)When should the antiderivative of a rational function be defined as a piecewise function?Domain of this functionWhat is the domain of the inverse functionDomain of the function and its simplified expressionIs this interval in the domain?Showing that $sum_n=2^infty f(frac 1n)$ converges using the MVTWhat does it mean for a function to be continuous on its domain?Finding the domain of $sqrtx^2-7$Maximum domain of definition of some $ln$ and $sqrtx$ functionNo Derivability at 0+ point, why not including 0 in function domain










5












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Apr 14 at 9:39










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=x^3-x>0.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Apr 14 at 9:42











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 9:46










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Apr 14 at 9:55










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Apr 14 at 18:21















5












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Apr 14 at 9:39










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=x^3-x>0.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Apr 14 at 9:42











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 9:46










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Apr 14 at 9:55










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Apr 14 at 18:21













5












5








5





$begingroup$


Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]x^3 -x$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?







calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 14 at 18:18









Asaf Karagila

309k33441775




309k33441775










asked Apr 14 at 9:36









J.MohJ.Moh

695




695











  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Apr 14 at 9:39










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=x^3-x>0.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Apr 14 at 9:42











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 9:46










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Apr 14 at 9:55










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Apr 14 at 18:21
















  • $begingroup$
    It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Apr 14 at 9:39










  • $begingroup$
    I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=x^3-x>0.$ All these a definition only.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Apr 14 at 9:42











  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 9:46










  • $begingroup$
    $$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Apr 14 at 9:55










  • $begingroup$
    Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Apr 14 at 18:21















$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Apr 14 at 9:39




$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Apr 14 at 9:39












$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=x^3-x>0.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Apr 14 at 9:42





$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^frac13$ so $D(g)=x^3-x>0.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
Apr 14 at 9:42













$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
Apr 14 at 9:46




$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
Apr 14 at 9:46












$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Apr 14 at 9:55




$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Apr 14 at 9:55












$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Apr 14 at 18:21




$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrtx^3-x$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]x^3 -x$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Apr 14 at 18:21










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 10:26







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Apr 14 at 15:30











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Apr 14 at 15:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 15:35










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 15:36











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3187198%2fwhat-is-the-domain-of-the-function-fx-sqrt3x3-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12












$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 10:26







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Apr 14 at 15:30











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Apr 14 at 15:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 15:35










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 15:36















12












$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 10:26







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Apr 14 at 15:30











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Apr 14 at 15:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 15:35










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 15:36













12












12








12





$begingroup$

If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]phantomX$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.



Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]phantom X$ to be defined.



Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.



Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.



(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).



You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Apr 14 at 10:03

























answered Apr 14 at 9:57









Henning MakholmHenning Makholm

244k17312556




244k17312556











  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 10:26







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Apr 14 at 15:30











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Apr 14 at 15:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 15:35










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 15:36
















  • $begingroup$
    That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 10:26







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Apr 14 at 15:30











  • $begingroup$
    @J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Apr 14 at 15:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 15:35










  • $begingroup$
    @user21820 I did
    $endgroup$
    – J.Moh
    Apr 14 at 15:36















$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
Apr 14 at 10:26





$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
Apr 14 at 10:26





1




1




$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 14 at 15:30





$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]x$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbbR x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbbR$ to $mathbbR$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 14 at 15:30













$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 14 at 15:32




$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Apr 14 at 15:32




1




1




$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
Apr 14 at 15:35




$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
Apr 14 at 15:35












$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
Apr 14 at 15:36




$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
Apr 14 at 15:36

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3187198%2fwhat-is-the-domain-of-the-function-fx-sqrt3x3-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020