Why can't we divide the electromagnetic spectrum into arbitrarily many radio frequency bands?In a RAKE receiver, why is a Path Searcher needed? Can't the delays be found from the Channel Estimator?Calculating the voltage produced by Radio frequencyAntenna Length for Low Frequency Radio Signals - Why so long?What does the term “fixed” mean on the radio spectrum?Where on a cellphone does the electromagnetic radiation(radio frequencies) come from? the antennae or the transmitter?Why are the capacitors set up this way in this old tube radio?If an FM signal has different frequencies, how does the radio receive the signal in a fixed frequency?Why are radio signals clearer near the human body?In an AM radio do the electromagnetic waves cause the antenna to resonate to produce an alternating current?Consistent Radio wave detection timing

What does a yield inside a yield do?

Catholic vs Protestant Support for Nazism in Germany

Missed the connecting flight, separate tickets on same airline - who is responsible?

If prion is a protein. Why is it not disassembled by the digestive system?

Should I replace my bicycle tires if they have not been inflated in multiple years

In Endgame, why were these characters still around?

Point of the the Dothraki's attack in GoT S8E3?

Moving the subject of the sentence into a dangling participle

Selecting a secure PIN for building access

Does this article imply that Turing-Computability is not the same as "effectively computable"?

Reconstruct a matrix from its traces

What is the unit of the area when geometry attributes are calculated in QGIS?

Do I really need diodes to receive MIDI?

Why is Arya visibly scared in the library in S8E3?

What word means "to make something obsolete"?

Type-check an expression

What is the most remote airport from the center of the city it supposedly serves?

What is the minimal installation possible in order to run a .jar Java file?

Is it cheaper to drop cargo than to land it?

Identifying a transmission to myself

How can I get a job without pushing my family's income into a higher tax bracket?

Can I get a paladin's steed by True Polymorphing into a monster that can cast Find Steed?

What actually is the vector of angular momentum?

Is induction neccessary for proving that every injective mapping of a finite set into itself is a mapping onto itself?



Why can't we divide the electromagnetic spectrum into arbitrarily many radio frequency bands?


In a RAKE receiver, why is a Path Searcher needed? Can't the delays be found from the Channel Estimator?Calculating the voltage produced by Radio frequencyAntenna Length for Low Frequency Radio Signals - Why so long?What does the term “fixed” mean on the radio spectrum?Where on a cellphone does the electromagnetic radiation(radio frequencies) come from? the antennae or the transmitter?Why are the capacitors set up this way in this old tube radio?If an FM signal has different frequencies, how does the radio receive the signal in a fixed frequency?Why are radio signals clearer near the human body?In an AM radio do the electromagnetic waves cause the antenna to resonate to produce an alternating current?Consistent Radio wave detection timing






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I understand there is concern over the limited amount of wireless spectrum available for allocation but am somewhat confused as to why. Couldn't we just divide the electromagnetic spectrum into as many radio frequency bands as we need by making the communication frequency more precise, i.e. broadcasting over 101.713 MHz instead of 101.7 MHz in order to make more room. What are the limiting factors preventing us from doing this?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Do a web search on "channel capacity". There's a strong correlation on occupied bandwidth and data rate -- and the more channels you shove into a given bandwidth, of necessity the narrower those channels need to be.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    Apr 23 at 0:18










  • $begingroup$
    @TimWescott Thanks, that is exactly the information I was looking for but couldn't find the name.
    $endgroup$
    – nellapizza
    Apr 23 at 0:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's kind of like trying to make more room in a box by dividing it up into arbitrarily small compartments. The compartments get less useful because each one can hold less and less.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Apr 23 at 1:36






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Information is carried along in SIDEBANDS. To preserve the information, the sidebands need substantial energy and cannot be arbitrarily filtered.
    $endgroup$
    – analogsystemsrf
    Apr 23 at 2:19










  • $begingroup$
    This is actually where the term bandwidth comes from - the band needs some width. Put overy simply, the more (band)width the more information you can reliably transmit over said band. Hence the less (band)width, the less information, until the band gets too narrow to be of any use.
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel
    Apr 23 at 9:02

















3












$begingroup$


I understand there is concern over the limited amount of wireless spectrum available for allocation but am somewhat confused as to why. Couldn't we just divide the electromagnetic spectrum into as many radio frequency bands as we need by making the communication frequency more precise, i.e. broadcasting over 101.713 MHz instead of 101.7 MHz in order to make more room. What are the limiting factors preventing us from doing this?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Do a web search on "channel capacity". There's a strong correlation on occupied bandwidth and data rate -- and the more channels you shove into a given bandwidth, of necessity the narrower those channels need to be.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    Apr 23 at 0:18










  • $begingroup$
    @TimWescott Thanks, that is exactly the information I was looking for but couldn't find the name.
    $endgroup$
    – nellapizza
    Apr 23 at 0:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's kind of like trying to make more room in a box by dividing it up into arbitrarily small compartments. The compartments get less useful because each one can hold less and less.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Apr 23 at 1:36






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Information is carried along in SIDEBANDS. To preserve the information, the sidebands need substantial energy and cannot be arbitrarily filtered.
    $endgroup$
    – analogsystemsrf
    Apr 23 at 2:19










  • $begingroup$
    This is actually where the term bandwidth comes from - the band needs some width. Put overy simply, the more (band)width the more information you can reliably transmit over said band. Hence the less (band)width, the less information, until the band gets too narrow to be of any use.
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel
    Apr 23 at 9:02













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I understand there is concern over the limited amount of wireless spectrum available for allocation but am somewhat confused as to why. Couldn't we just divide the electromagnetic spectrum into as many radio frequency bands as we need by making the communication frequency more precise, i.e. broadcasting over 101.713 MHz instead of 101.7 MHz in order to make more room. What are the limiting factors preventing us from doing this?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I understand there is concern over the limited amount of wireless spectrum available for allocation but am somewhat confused as to why. Couldn't we just divide the electromagnetic spectrum into as many radio frequency bands as we need by making the communication frequency more precise, i.e. broadcasting over 101.713 MHz instead of 101.7 MHz in order to make more room. What are the limiting factors preventing us from doing this?







rf wireless radio cellphone fm






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 23 at 0:15









nellapizzanellapizza

212




212











  • $begingroup$
    Do a web search on "channel capacity". There's a strong correlation on occupied bandwidth and data rate -- and the more channels you shove into a given bandwidth, of necessity the narrower those channels need to be.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    Apr 23 at 0:18










  • $begingroup$
    @TimWescott Thanks, that is exactly the information I was looking for but couldn't find the name.
    $endgroup$
    – nellapizza
    Apr 23 at 0:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's kind of like trying to make more room in a box by dividing it up into arbitrarily small compartments. The compartments get less useful because each one can hold less and less.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Apr 23 at 1:36






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Information is carried along in SIDEBANDS. To preserve the information, the sidebands need substantial energy and cannot be arbitrarily filtered.
    $endgroup$
    – analogsystemsrf
    Apr 23 at 2:19










  • $begingroup$
    This is actually where the term bandwidth comes from - the band needs some width. Put overy simply, the more (band)width the more information you can reliably transmit over said band. Hence the less (band)width, the less information, until the band gets too narrow to be of any use.
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel
    Apr 23 at 9:02
















  • $begingroup$
    Do a web search on "channel capacity". There's a strong correlation on occupied bandwidth and data rate -- and the more channels you shove into a given bandwidth, of necessity the narrower those channels need to be.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    Apr 23 at 0:18










  • $begingroup$
    @TimWescott Thanks, that is exactly the information I was looking for but couldn't find the name.
    $endgroup$
    – nellapizza
    Apr 23 at 0:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's kind of like trying to make more room in a box by dividing it up into arbitrarily small compartments. The compartments get less useful because each one can hold less and less.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Apr 23 at 1:36






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Information is carried along in SIDEBANDS. To preserve the information, the sidebands need substantial energy and cannot be arbitrarily filtered.
    $endgroup$
    – analogsystemsrf
    Apr 23 at 2:19










  • $begingroup$
    This is actually where the term bandwidth comes from - the band needs some width. Put overy simply, the more (band)width the more information you can reliably transmit over said band. Hence the less (band)width, the less information, until the band gets too narrow to be of any use.
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel
    Apr 23 at 9:02















$begingroup$
Do a web search on "channel capacity". There's a strong correlation on occupied bandwidth and data rate -- and the more channels you shove into a given bandwidth, of necessity the narrower those channels need to be.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
Apr 23 at 0:18




$begingroup$
Do a web search on "channel capacity". There's a strong correlation on occupied bandwidth and data rate -- and the more channels you shove into a given bandwidth, of necessity the narrower those channels need to be.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
Apr 23 at 0:18












$begingroup$
@TimWescott Thanks, that is exactly the information I was looking for but couldn't find the name.
$endgroup$
– nellapizza
Apr 23 at 0:26




$begingroup$
@TimWescott Thanks, that is exactly the information I was looking for but couldn't find the name.
$endgroup$
– nellapizza
Apr 23 at 0:26




3




3




$begingroup$
It's kind of like trying to make more room in a box by dividing it up into arbitrarily small compartments. The compartments get less useful because each one can hold less and less.
$endgroup$
– Toor
Apr 23 at 1:36




$begingroup$
It's kind of like trying to make more room in a box by dividing it up into arbitrarily small compartments. The compartments get less useful because each one can hold less and less.
$endgroup$
– Toor
Apr 23 at 1:36




3




3




$begingroup$
Information is carried along in SIDEBANDS. To preserve the information, the sidebands need substantial energy and cannot be arbitrarily filtered.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
Apr 23 at 2:19




$begingroup$
Information is carried along in SIDEBANDS. To preserve the information, the sidebands need substantial energy and cannot be arbitrarily filtered.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
Apr 23 at 2:19












$begingroup$
This is actually where the term bandwidth comes from - the band needs some width. Put overy simply, the more (band)width the more information you can reliably transmit over said band. Hence the less (band)width, the less information, until the band gets too narrow to be of any use.
$endgroup$
– Pavel
Apr 23 at 9:02




$begingroup$
This is actually where the term bandwidth comes from - the band needs some width. Put overy simply, the more (band)width the more information you can reliably transmit over said band. Hence the less (band)width, the less information, until the band gets too narrow to be of any use.
$endgroup$
– Pavel
Apr 23 at 9:02










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Signals don't exist at a single frequency. They have a bandwidth that spreads across spectrum. The radio station at 101.7MHz takes up the spectrum from 101.6-101.8MHz.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f433949%2fwhy-cant-we-divide-the-electromagnetic-spectrum-into-arbitrarily-many-radio-fre%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    Signals don't exist at a single frequency. They have a bandwidth that spreads across spectrum. The radio station at 101.7MHz takes up the spectrum from 101.6-101.8MHz.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      6












      $begingroup$

      Signals don't exist at a single frequency. They have a bandwidth that spreads across spectrum. The radio station at 101.7MHz takes up the spectrum from 101.6-101.8MHz.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        Signals don't exist at a single frequency. They have a bandwidth that spreads across spectrum. The radio station at 101.7MHz takes up the spectrum from 101.6-101.8MHz.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Signals don't exist at a single frequency. They have a bandwidth that spreads across spectrum. The radio station at 101.7MHz takes up the spectrum from 101.6-101.8MHz.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 23 at 0:18









        Charles HCharles H

        1761




        1761



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f433949%2fwhy-cant-we-divide-the-electromagnetic-spectrum-into-arbitrarily-many-radio-fre%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to write a 12-bar blues melodyI-IV-V blues progressionHow to play the bridges in a standard blues progressionHow does Gdim7 fit in C# minor?question on a certain chord progressionMusicology of Melody12 bar blues, spread rhythm: alternative to 6th chord to avoid finger stretchChord progressions/ Root key/ MelodiesHow to put chords (POP-EDM) under a given lead vocal melody (starting from a good knowledge in music theory)Are there “rules” for improvising with the minor pentatonic scale over 12-bar shuffle?Confusion about blues scale and chords

            What if the end-user didn't have the required library?What is setup.py?What is a clean, pythonic way to have multiple constructors in Python?What does Ruby have that Python doesn't, and vice versa?What is the reason for having '//' in Python?How do I create a namespace package in Python?How to package shared objects that python modules depend on?setuptools vs. distutils: why is distutils still a thing?Navigation in Windows 10 vs code not going to virtualenv library when the same library is installed at user levelPython create package for local usePackaging a project that uses multiple python versionsWhy is permission denied on pip install except for when “--user” is included at end of command?

            Esgonzo ibérico Índice Descrición Distribución Hábitat Ameazas Notas Véxase tamén "Acerca dos nomes dos anfibios e réptiles galegos""Chalcides bedriagai"Chalcides bedriagai en Carrascal, L. M. Salvador, A. (Eds). Enciclopedia virtual de los vertebrados españoles. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid. España.Fotos