ACL Rule to Open UDP Portsnmap shows opened port but netstat doesn'tHow to open OpenVPN port (1194) on server?nmap scan only state of portAllowing incoming VPN connections through a Cisco 2921 to a DD-WRT DeviceTest port reachability from a remote host even though the port is not bound to a service?Can a port be in the listen state and be closed?Port 80 filtered nmapPort-scanning on Cisco router with NmapAllowing ports using iptables fails

How to reverse input order?

What does $!# mean in Shell scripting?

Where's this lookout in Nova Scotia?

Did this character show any indication of wanting to rule before S8E6?

I know that there is a preselected candidate for a position to be filled at my department. What should I do?

Question in discrete mathematics about group permutations

How did NASA Langley end up with the first 737?

Is it true that cut time means "play twice as fast as written"?

NIntegrate doesn't evaluate

USPS Back Room - Trespassing?

How to cut a climbing rope?

Compaq Portable vs IBM 5155 Portable PC

When the Torah was almost lost and one (or several) Rabbis saved it?

Where have Brexit voters gone?

Find the three digit Prime number P from the given unusual relationships

Could a 19.25mm revolver actually exist?

Apt - strange requests to d16r8ew072anqo.cloudfront.net:80

What is a fully qualified name?

Is it legal to meet with potential future employers in the UK, whilst visiting from the USA

Do photons bend spacetime or not?

Best material to absorb as much light as possible

Why aren't space telescopes put in GEO?

Specific alignment within beginalign environment

How to patch glass cuts in a bicycle tire?



ACL Rule to Open UDP Ports


nmap shows opened port but netstat doesn'tHow to open OpenVPN port (1194) on server?nmap scan only state of portAllowing incoming VPN connections through a Cisco 2921 to a DD-WRT DeviceTest port reachability from a remote host even though the port is not bound to a service?Can a port be in the listen state and be closed?Port 80 filtered nmapPort-scanning on Cisco router with NmapAllowing ports using iptables fails






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I have the current rules in an attempt to open port 5060 and 10000-20000 for my VoIP provider. We are on a Cisco 1921 router. This ACL is applied to the WAN port on the router facing the ISP. Nmap port scan shows these ports as closed.



  1. Can anyone help verify my ACL and correct my rule if necessary?

  2. Do I need an outbound ACL to open up the port as well since this is for a hosted VoIP PBX?

  3. Is Nmap not detecting the open port because I am not the specific host for the ACL? I tried some other ports that are not specific to a public IP and Nmap also shows as closed.

  4. Do my L3 switches behind the router also need an ACL to open ports if they are between the PC and the router?

Router Config



interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description WAN
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.240
ip access-group 101 in
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description LAN
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
!
access-list 101 permit udp host x.x.x.x any eq 5060
access-list 101 permit udp host x.x.x.x any range 10000 20000


Nmap Port Scan



Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
Nmap scan report for
Host is up (0.022s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
5060/udp closed sip

Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
Nmap scan report for
Host is up (0.023s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
10000/udp closed ndmp


Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
Nmap scan report for wsip-184-191-183-54.sd.sd.cox.net (184.191.183.54)
Host is up (0.026s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
20000/udp closed unknown









share|improve this question




























    0















    I have the current rules in an attempt to open port 5060 and 10000-20000 for my VoIP provider. We are on a Cisco 1921 router. This ACL is applied to the WAN port on the router facing the ISP. Nmap port scan shows these ports as closed.



    1. Can anyone help verify my ACL and correct my rule if necessary?

    2. Do I need an outbound ACL to open up the port as well since this is for a hosted VoIP PBX?

    3. Is Nmap not detecting the open port because I am not the specific host for the ACL? I tried some other ports that are not specific to a public IP and Nmap also shows as closed.

    4. Do my L3 switches behind the router also need an ACL to open ports if they are between the PC and the router?

    Router Config



    interface GigabitEthernet0/0
    description WAN
    ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.240
    ip access-group 101 in
    ip nat outside
    ip virtual-reassembly in
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    description LAN
    ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
    ip nat inside
    ip virtual-reassembly in
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    !
    access-list 101 permit udp host x.x.x.x any eq 5060
    access-list 101 permit udp host x.x.x.x any range 10000 20000


    Nmap Port Scan



    Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
    Nmap scan report for
    Host is up (0.022s latency).
    PORT STATE SERVICE
    5060/udp closed sip

    Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
    Nmap scan report for
    Host is up (0.023s latency).
    PORT STATE SERVICE
    10000/udp closed ndmp


    Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
    Nmap scan report for wsip-184-191-183-54.sd.sd.cox.net (184.191.183.54)
    Host is up (0.026s latency).
    PORT STATE SERVICE
    20000/udp closed unknown









    share|improve this question
























      0












      0








      0








      I have the current rules in an attempt to open port 5060 and 10000-20000 for my VoIP provider. We are on a Cisco 1921 router. This ACL is applied to the WAN port on the router facing the ISP. Nmap port scan shows these ports as closed.



      1. Can anyone help verify my ACL and correct my rule if necessary?

      2. Do I need an outbound ACL to open up the port as well since this is for a hosted VoIP PBX?

      3. Is Nmap not detecting the open port because I am not the specific host for the ACL? I tried some other ports that are not specific to a public IP and Nmap also shows as closed.

      4. Do my L3 switches behind the router also need an ACL to open ports if they are between the PC and the router?

      Router Config



      interface GigabitEthernet0/0
      description WAN
      ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.240
      ip access-group 101 in
      ip nat outside
      ip virtual-reassembly in
      duplex auto
      speed auto
      !
      interface GigabitEthernet0/1
      description LAN
      ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
      ip nat inside
      ip virtual-reassembly in
      duplex auto
      speed auto
      !
      access-list 101 permit udp host x.x.x.x any eq 5060
      access-list 101 permit udp host x.x.x.x any range 10000 20000


      Nmap Port Scan



      Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
      Nmap scan report for
      Host is up (0.022s latency).
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      5060/udp closed sip

      Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
      Nmap scan report for
      Host is up (0.023s latency).
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      10000/udp closed ndmp


      Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
      Nmap scan report for wsip-184-191-183-54.sd.sd.cox.net (184.191.183.54)
      Host is up (0.026s latency).
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      20000/udp closed unknown









      share|improve this question














      I have the current rules in an attempt to open port 5060 and 10000-20000 for my VoIP provider. We are on a Cisco 1921 router. This ACL is applied to the WAN port on the router facing the ISP. Nmap port scan shows these ports as closed.



      1. Can anyone help verify my ACL and correct my rule if necessary?

      2. Do I need an outbound ACL to open up the port as well since this is for a hosted VoIP PBX?

      3. Is Nmap not detecting the open port because I am not the specific host for the ACL? I tried some other ports that are not specific to a public IP and Nmap also shows as closed.

      4. Do my L3 switches behind the router also need an ACL to open ports if they are between the PC and the router?

      Router Config



      interface GigabitEthernet0/0
      description WAN
      ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.240
      ip access-group 101 in
      ip nat outside
      ip virtual-reassembly in
      duplex auto
      speed auto
      !
      interface GigabitEthernet0/1
      description LAN
      ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
      ip nat inside
      ip virtual-reassembly in
      duplex auto
      speed auto
      !
      access-list 101 permit udp host x.x.x.x any eq 5060
      access-list 101 permit udp host x.x.x.x any range 10000 20000


      Nmap Port Scan



      Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
      Nmap scan report for
      Host is up (0.022s latency).
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      5060/udp closed sip

      Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
      Nmap scan report for
      Host is up (0.023s latency).
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      10000/udp closed ndmp


      Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-03-04 16:24 PST
      Nmap scan report for wsip-184-191-183-54.sd.sd.cox.net (184.191.183.54)
      Host is up (0.026s latency).
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      20000/udp closed unknown






      cisco router port access-control-list nmap






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 6 '15 at 17:29









      KevKev

      387




      387




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Because you are NATing from G0/0 to G0/1 you cannot use an access-list to allow traffic. NAT acts as a firewall so you need to use a Port-Address Translation rule. For the single port, that would look like this:



          ip nat inside source static udp x.x.x.x 5060 interface g0/0 5060


          The port range is a bit more tricky, as IOS doesn't usually deal with port ranges. However, it does have functionality built in for voice udp traffic ranges - however this is limited to port ranges which are multiples of 64. To catch your required ports:



          ip nat portmap VOICE
          appl udp-rtp startport 9984 size 10240


          This defines a port range of 10240 ports starting at 9984. Finally you need to apply this port map to NAT:



          ip nat inside source list # interface g0/0 overload portmap VOICE


          Where list # is the access list which encompasses the internal addresses you are translating to. An NMAP scan should confirm that the ports are open.



          Hope this helps!






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "2"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f673553%2facl-rule-to-open-udp-ports%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            Because you are NATing from G0/0 to G0/1 you cannot use an access-list to allow traffic. NAT acts as a firewall so you need to use a Port-Address Translation rule. For the single port, that would look like this:



            ip nat inside source static udp x.x.x.x 5060 interface g0/0 5060


            The port range is a bit more tricky, as IOS doesn't usually deal with port ranges. However, it does have functionality built in for voice udp traffic ranges - however this is limited to port ranges which are multiples of 64. To catch your required ports:



            ip nat portmap VOICE
            appl udp-rtp startport 9984 size 10240


            This defines a port range of 10240 ports starting at 9984. Finally you need to apply this port map to NAT:



            ip nat inside source list # interface g0/0 overload portmap VOICE


            Where list # is the access list which encompasses the internal addresses you are translating to. An NMAP scan should confirm that the ports are open.



            Hope this helps!






            share|improve this answer





























              0














              Because you are NATing from G0/0 to G0/1 you cannot use an access-list to allow traffic. NAT acts as a firewall so you need to use a Port-Address Translation rule. For the single port, that would look like this:



              ip nat inside source static udp x.x.x.x 5060 interface g0/0 5060


              The port range is a bit more tricky, as IOS doesn't usually deal with port ranges. However, it does have functionality built in for voice udp traffic ranges - however this is limited to port ranges which are multiples of 64. To catch your required ports:



              ip nat portmap VOICE
              appl udp-rtp startport 9984 size 10240


              This defines a port range of 10240 ports starting at 9984. Finally you need to apply this port map to NAT:



              ip nat inside source list # interface g0/0 overload portmap VOICE


              Where list # is the access list which encompasses the internal addresses you are translating to. An NMAP scan should confirm that the ports are open.



              Hope this helps!






              share|improve this answer



























                0












                0








                0







                Because you are NATing from G0/0 to G0/1 you cannot use an access-list to allow traffic. NAT acts as a firewall so you need to use a Port-Address Translation rule. For the single port, that would look like this:



                ip nat inside source static udp x.x.x.x 5060 interface g0/0 5060


                The port range is a bit more tricky, as IOS doesn't usually deal with port ranges. However, it does have functionality built in for voice udp traffic ranges - however this is limited to port ranges which are multiples of 64. To catch your required ports:



                ip nat portmap VOICE
                appl udp-rtp startport 9984 size 10240


                This defines a port range of 10240 ports starting at 9984. Finally you need to apply this port map to NAT:



                ip nat inside source list # interface g0/0 overload portmap VOICE


                Where list # is the access list which encompasses the internal addresses you are translating to. An NMAP scan should confirm that the ports are open.



                Hope this helps!






                share|improve this answer















                Because you are NATing from G0/0 to G0/1 you cannot use an access-list to allow traffic. NAT acts as a firewall so you need to use a Port-Address Translation rule. For the single port, that would look like this:



                ip nat inside source static udp x.x.x.x 5060 interface g0/0 5060


                The port range is a bit more tricky, as IOS doesn't usually deal with port ranges. However, it does have functionality built in for voice udp traffic ranges - however this is limited to port ranges which are multiples of 64. To catch your required ports:



                ip nat portmap VOICE
                appl udp-rtp startport 9984 size 10240


                This defines a port range of 10240 ports starting at 9984. Finally you need to apply this port map to NAT:



                ip nat inside source list # interface g0/0 overload portmap VOICE


                Where list # is the access list which encompasses the internal addresses you are translating to. An NMAP scan should confirm that the ports are open.



                Hope this helps!







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Apr 6 '15 at 9:31

























                answered Apr 3 '15 at 15:50









                AlienPieAlienPie

                484




                484



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f673553%2facl-rule-to-open-udp-ports%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

                    Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

                    What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company