Defining standard qubit gates for qutritsWhy is the decomposition of a qubit-qutrit Hamiltonian in terms of Pauli and Gell-Mann matrices not unique?How to apply single and two qubit gates to 2 qubits multiple times?The general form of unitary operations on a single qubitQutrit TeleportationWhat is the matrix for the operator that implements a function to tell the parity of its argument?Matrix representation and CX gateHow does quantum function parallelism work?What's the point of quantum gates being 'continuous'?How do you implement the gates for Grover's algorithm for more than 4 elements?Making a maximally mixed 2-qubit state in the IBM Q

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Is my company merging branches wrong?

Is being an extrovert a necessary condition to be a manager?

How to use Screen Sharing if I don't know the remote Mac's IP address

How do you cope with rejection?

What causes a person to remain in this world as a ghost?

Why is there no current between two capacitors connected in series?

Was Tyrion always a poor strategist?

Does the fact that we can only measure the two-way speed of light undermine the axiom of invariance?

Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"

Is there a word for pant sleeves?

How is dynamic resistance of a diode modeled for large voltage variations?

Removing Doubles Destroy Topology

Parse a C++14 integer literal

Existence of a model of ZFC in which the natural numbers are really the natural numbers

Why does an injection from a set to a countable set imply that set is countable?

How to draw with Tikz a chord parallel to AC that passes through a point?

Why use nominative in Coniugatio periphrastica passiva?

If you attack a Tarrasque while swallowed, what AC do you need to beat to hit it?

1950s or earlier book with electrical currents living on Pluto

pwaS eht tirsf dna tasl setterl fo hace dorw

Why is this python script running in background consuming 100 % CPU?

How would a physicist explain this starship engine?

Is there a way to generate a mapping graph like this?

Warped chessboard



Defining standard qubit gates for qutrits


Why is the decomposition of a qubit-qutrit Hamiltonian in terms of Pauli and Gell-Mann matrices not unique?How to apply single and two qubit gates to 2 qubits multiple times?The general form of unitary operations on a single qubitQutrit TeleportationWhat is the matrix for the operator that implements a function to tell the parity of its argument?Matrix representation and CX gateHow does quantum function parallelism work?What's the point of quantum gates being 'continuous'?How do you implement the gates for Grover's algorithm for more than 4 elements?Making a maximally mixed 2-qubit state in the IBM Q






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I am actually working on quantum computing with qutrits. I am trying to define standard qubit gates for qutrits. The CNOT gate for qubits is defined as follows: $$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 2rangle.$$



So the matrix is $$mathrmUCN =
beginpmatrix
1 & 0 & 0 & 0\
0 & 1 & 0 & 0\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0
endpmatrix.$$



For the definition of the same type of gate for qutrit I am left with two choices:



$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 3rangle$$
$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+2x bmod 3rangle$$



Does anyone know if one of the two is more common or more usually defined?



PS: I know that applying one two times is equivalent to apply the other one time.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Hi, Marco. Welcome to Quantum Computing SE! It is preferable that you use MathJax to typeset your posts. Review How to write a good question?. I've edited the question on your behalf.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanchayan Dutta
    May 7 at 16:18











  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sanchayan, thanks a lot for the edit and the advice. I will make sure that I write a good question next time.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Falso
    May 7 at 16:21

















3












$begingroup$


I am actually working on quantum computing with qutrits. I am trying to define standard qubit gates for qutrits. The CNOT gate for qubits is defined as follows: $$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 2rangle.$$



So the matrix is $$mathrmUCN =
beginpmatrix
1 & 0 & 0 & 0\
0 & 1 & 0 & 0\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0
endpmatrix.$$



For the definition of the same type of gate for qutrit I am left with two choices:



$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 3rangle$$
$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+2x bmod 3rangle$$



Does anyone know if one of the two is more common or more usually defined?



PS: I know that applying one two times is equivalent to apply the other one time.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Hi, Marco. Welcome to Quantum Computing SE! It is preferable that you use MathJax to typeset your posts. Review How to write a good question?. I've edited the question on your behalf.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanchayan Dutta
    May 7 at 16:18











  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sanchayan, thanks a lot for the edit and the advice. I will make sure that I write a good question next time.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Falso
    May 7 at 16:21













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I am actually working on quantum computing with qutrits. I am trying to define standard qubit gates for qutrits. The CNOT gate for qubits is defined as follows: $$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 2rangle.$$



So the matrix is $$mathrmUCN =
beginpmatrix
1 & 0 & 0 & 0\
0 & 1 & 0 & 0\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0
endpmatrix.$$



For the definition of the same type of gate for qutrit I am left with two choices:



$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 3rangle$$
$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+2x bmod 3rangle$$



Does anyone know if one of the two is more common or more usually defined?



PS: I know that applying one two times is equivalent to apply the other one time.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am actually working on quantum computing with qutrits. I am trying to define standard qubit gates for qutrits. The CNOT gate for qubits is defined as follows: $$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 2rangle.$$



So the matrix is $$mathrmUCN =
beginpmatrix
1 & 0 & 0 & 0\
0 & 1 & 0 & 0\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0
endpmatrix.$$



For the definition of the same type of gate for qutrit I am left with two choices:



$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 3rangle$$
$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+2x bmod 3rangle$$



Does anyone know if one of the two is more common or more usually defined?



PS: I know that applying one two times is equivalent to apply the other one time.







quantum-gate qutrit






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 7 at 16:14









Sanchayan Dutta

7,12041658




7,12041658










asked May 7 at 14:08









Marco FalsoMarco Falso

184




184











  • $begingroup$
    Hi, Marco. Welcome to Quantum Computing SE! It is preferable that you use MathJax to typeset your posts. Review How to write a good question?. I've edited the question on your behalf.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanchayan Dutta
    May 7 at 16:18











  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sanchayan, thanks a lot for the edit and the advice. I will make sure that I write a good question next time.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Falso
    May 7 at 16:21
















  • $begingroup$
    Hi, Marco. Welcome to Quantum Computing SE! It is preferable that you use MathJax to typeset your posts. Review How to write a good question?. I've edited the question on your behalf.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanchayan Dutta
    May 7 at 16:18











  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sanchayan, thanks a lot for the edit and the advice. I will make sure that I write a good question next time.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Falso
    May 7 at 16:21















$begingroup$
Hi, Marco. Welcome to Quantum Computing SE! It is preferable that you use MathJax to typeset your posts. Review How to write a good question?. I've edited the question on your behalf.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta
May 7 at 16:18





$begingroup$
Hi, Marco. Welcome to Quantum Computing SE! It is preferable that you use MathJax to typeset your posts. Review How to write a good question?. I've edited the question on your behalf.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta
May 7 at 16:18













$begingroup$
Hi Sanchayan, thanks a lot for the edit and the advice. I will make sure that I write a good question next time.
$endgroup$
– Marco Falso
May 7 at 16:21




$begingroup$
Hi Sanchayan, thanks a lot for the edit and the advice. I will make sure that I write a good question next time.
$endgroup$
– Marco Falso
May 7 at 16:21










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Your first definition,



$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 3rangle$$



is both more common and, IMO, easier to use. Especially as you point out that the second definition can be simulated by repeated application of the first. You can see the authors have used this version of the qutrit CNOT in
Construction of two qutrit entanglement by using magnetic resonance selective pulse sequences (Çorbaci et al., 2016) and in
Controlled Not (Cnot) Gate For Two Qutrit Systems, (KOCAKOÇ & TAPRAMAZ, 2018).



Additionally, you may want to consider the context of your qutrit gates. For example, section 2 of arXiv:1105.5485 first defines three versions of the qutrit X gate and then discusses what a controlled X would mean in these cases.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot for the articles. None of them uses the Hadamard gate I am using but at least I have some articles to relate to about computation with qutrits. I am convinced that X gate and Hadamard gate must change all the states and not be only extensions of the two dimensional ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Falso
    May 7 at 17:40











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6087%2fdefining-standard-qubit-gates-for-qutrits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Your first definition,



$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 3rangle$$



is both more common and, IMO, easier to use. Especially as you point out that the second definition can be simulated by repeated application of the first. You can see the authors have used this version of the qutrit CNOT in
Construction of two qutrit entanglement by using magnetic resonance selective pulse sequences (Çorbaci et al., 2016) and in
Controlled Not (Cnot) Gate For Two Qutrit Systems, (KOCAKOÇ & TAPRAMAZ, 2018).



Additionally, you may want to consider the context of your qutrit gates. For example, section 2 of arXiv:1105.5485 first defines three versions of the qutrit X gate and then discusses what a controlled X would mean in these cases.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot for the articles. None of them uses the Hadamard gate I am using but at least I have some articles to relate to about computation with qutrits. I am convinced that X gate and Hadamard gate must change all the states and not be only extensions of the two dimensional ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Falso
    May 7 at 17:40















3












$begingroup$

Your first definition,



$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 3rangle$$



is both more common and, IMO, easier to use. Especially as you point out that the second definition can be simulated by repeated application of the first. You can see the authors have used this version of the qutrit CNOT in
Construction of two qutrit entanglement by using magnetic resonance selective pulse sequences (Çorbaci et al., 2016) and in
Controlled Not (Cnot) Gate For Two Qutrit Systems, (KOCAKOÇ & TAPRAMAZ, 2018).



Additionally, you may want to consider the context of your qutrit gates. For example, section 2 of arXiv:1105.5485 first defines three versions of the qutrit X gate and then discusses what a controlled X would mean in these cases.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot for the articles. None of them uses the Hadamard gate I am using but at least I have some articles to relate to about computation with qutrits. I am convinced that X gate and Hadamard gate must change all the states and not be only extensions of the two dimensional ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Falso
    May 7 at 17:40













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Your first definition,



$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 3rangle$$



is both more common and, IMO, easier to use. Especially as you point out that the second definition can be simulated by repeated application of the first. You can see the authors have used this version of the qutrit CNOT in
Construction of two qutrit entanglement by using magnetic resonance selective pulse sequences (Çorbaci et al., 2016) and in
Controlled Not (Cnot) Gate For Two Qutrit Systems, (KOCAKOÇ & TAPRAMAZ, 2018).



Additionally, you may want to consider the context of your qutrit gates. For example, section 2 of arXiv:1105.5485 first defines three versions of the qutrit X gate and then discusses what a controlled X would mean in these cases.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Your first definition,



$$|x,yrangle to |x,y+x bmod 3rangle$$



is both more common and, IMO, easier to use. Especially as you point out that the second definition can be simulated by repeated application of the first. You can see the authors have used this version of the qutrit CNOT in
Construction of two qutrit entanglement by using magnetic resonance selective pulse sequences (Çorbaci et al., 2016) and in
Controlled Not (Cnot) Gate For Two Qutrit Systems, (KOCAKOÇ & TAPRAMAZ, 2018).



Additionally, you may want to consider the context of your qutrit gates. For example, section 2 of arXiv:1105.5485 first defines three versions of the qutrit X gate and then discusses what a controlled X would mean in these cases.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 7 at 23:12









Sanchayan Dutta

7,12041658




7,12041658










answered May 7 at 16:44









Noah DNoah D

462




462











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot for the articles. None of them uses the Hadamard gate I am using but at least I have some articles to relate to about computation with qutrits. I am convinced that X gate and Hadamard gate must change all the states and not be only extensions of the two dimensional ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Falso
    May 7 at 17:40
















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot for the articles. None of them uses the Hadamard gate I am using but at least I have some articles to relate to about computation with qutrits. I am convinced that X gate and Hadamard gate must change all the states and not be only extensions of the two dimensional ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Falso
    May 7 at 17:40















$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for the articles. None of them uses the Hadamard gate I am using but at least I have some articles to relate to about computation with qutrits. I am convinced that X gate and Hadamard gate must change all the states and not be only extensions of the two dimensional ones.
$endgroup$
– Marco Falso
May 7 at 17:40




$begingroup$
Thanks a lot for the articles. None of them uses the Hadamard gate I am using but at least I have some articles to relate to about computation with qutrits. I am convinced that X gate and Hadamard gate must change all the states and not be only extensions of the two dimensional ones.
$endgroup$
– Marco Falso
May 7 at 17:40

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6087%2fdefining-standard-qubit-gates-for-qutrits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







80emjen 9RAkjFoGRk k7W,2QVM2 uTJKOQxW5,f0 HT f1pX lIslnRzm7XCCU1axmKLffk7X4s iLS512V
gVYJD3tU QXKjns0wP w5L6LYVTzLj,Sdkz7g3E8FyW,LlSlcHh d4DBpiP q2,pEv0rNW4BoQ i

Popular posts from this blog

RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020