Finding the root cause of Spanning-Tree recalculations (on Cisco Nexus 9000s)VLAN load sharing on Metro-E links between two Juniper EX 4200Cisco 2960 Portfast ports generate Spanning Tree TCNHow can I determine the STP designated bridge on Cisco IOS?Why showing IEEE Spanning Tree protocolCisco proprietary protocol - Spanning TreeHow do modern switches forward ethernet frames logically?Finding the optimum root bridge for a spanning treeSpanning tree root bridge process validationAdding new switch to Spanning Tree networkCisco nexus spanning-tree logging to syslog

Is keeping the forking link on a true fork necessary (Github/GPL)?

I want to know what marumaru means

Why does the hash of infinity have the digits of π?

Did this character show any indication of wanting to rule before S8E6?

Why do Russians almost not use verbs of possession akin to "have"?

A burglar's sunglasses, a lady's odyssey

Best shape for a necromancer's undead minions for battle?

Is there a simple example that empirical evidence is misleading?

If I arrive in the UK, and then head to mainland Europe, does my Schengen visa 90 day limit start when I arrived in the UK, or mainland Europe?

Where is Jon going?

Are there any German nonsense poems (Jabberwocky)?

Why did it take so long for Germany to allow electric scooters / e-rollers on the roads?

Is my plasma cannon concept viable?

Count all vowels in string

Is superuser the same as root?

Who knighted this Game of Thrones character?

How did NASA Langley end up with the first 737?

What is the recommended procedure to land a taildragger in a crosswind?

3 prong range outlet

How to let other coworkers know that I don't share my coworker's political views?

Can we assume that a hash function with high collision resistance also means highly uniform distribution?

Of strange atmospheres - the survivable but unbreathable

How to politely tell someone they did not hit reply all in email?

Why is the Eisenstein ideal paper so great?



Finding the root cause of Spanning-Tree recalculations (on Cisco Nexus 9000s)


VLAN load sharing on Metro-E links between two Juniper EX 4200Cisco 2960 Portfast ports generate Spanning Tree TCNHow can I determine the STP designated bridge on Cisco IOS?Why showing IEEE Spanning Tree protocolCisco proprietary protocol - Spanning TreeHow do modern switches forward ethernet frames logically?Finding the optimum root bridge for a spanning treeSpanning tree root bridge process validationAdding new switch to Spanning Tree networkCisco nexus spanning-tree logging to syslog













4















I have a nagging Rapid PVST problem on some Nexus 9000 switches. Rapid-PVST keeps recalculating 3 to 5 times an hour. We have in this topology (summarized):



 Edge Router Access Layer
+-------------+ +-------------+
| | Eth1/28 Eth1/54 | |
| Nexus9000_1 +-------------------------+ Nexus9000_2 |
| | Vlan350 | |
+-------------+ dot1q Trunk +-------------+
|Eth1/45 (dot1q trunk)
|
Something_Important


SHOW OUTPUT: Nexus9000_1



Nexus9000_1# sh spanning-tree vlan 350 detail | i from|topology|VLAN
VLAN0350 is executing the rstp compatible Spanning Tree protocol
Number of topology changes 1348 last change occurred 0:35:39 ago <---
from Ethernet1/28 <---
Times: hold 1, topology change 35, notification 2
Timers: hello 0, topology change 0, notification 0
... Output snipped ...


SHOW OUTPUT: Nexus9000_2



Nexus9000_2# sh spanning-tree vlan 350 detail | i from|topology|VLAN
VLAN0350 is executing the rstp compatible Spanning Tree protocol
Number of topology changes 1157 last change occurred 0:35:39 ago <---
from Ethernet1/54 <---
Times: hold 1, topology change 35, notification 2
Timers: hello 0, topology change 0, notification 0
... Output snipped ...


BACKGROUND



The reason I found the STP recalculations is because we got so many complaints about the device connected to Nexus9000_2 Eth1/45 having 30-ish second outages over and over again. Configuring Nexus9000_2 Eth1/45 as spanning-tree port type edge trunk made the problem much less visible because STP moves into a forwarding state much faster with that port-type.



I checked and know that the interfaces in this diagram are not flapping.



QUESTION



Each of those switches says it received a topology change notification (TCN) from the other switch. That's not very helpful... and I don't want to band-aid the problem with spanning-tree port type edge trunk on port Eth1/45.



What is the best way to find the root cause of these STP topology changes using the tools available on Nexus 9000 switches?



Please don't respond with show spanning-tree internal event-history all or other show spanning-tree internal commands without explaining what exactly to look for in those commands.










share|improve this question
























  • Do they actually recalculate the spanning tree, or are they just flooding another switch's TC flagged BPDU? (while flushing their CAM tables)

    – Marc 'netztier' Luethi
    May 10 at 5:09















4















I have a nagging Rapid PVST problem on some Nexus 9000 switches. Rapid-PVST keeps recalculating 3 to 5 times an hour. We have in this topology (summarized):



 Edge Router Access Layer
+-------------+ +-------------+
| | Eth1/28 Eth1/54 | |
| Nexus9000_1 +-------------------------+ Nexus9000_2 |
| | Vlan350 | |
+-------------+ dot1q Trunk +-------------+
|Eth1/45 (dot1q trunk)
|
Something_Important


SHOW OUTPUT: Nexus9000_1



Nexus9000_1# sh spanning-tree vlan 350 detail | i from|topology|VLAN
VLAN0350 is executing the rstp compatible Spanning Tree protocol
Number of topology changes 1348 last change occurred 0:35:39 ago <---
from Ethernet1/28 <---
Times: hold 1, topology change 35, notification 2
Timers: hello 0, topology change 0, notification 0
... Output snipped ...


SHOW OUTPUT: Nexus9000_2



Nexus9000_2# sh spanning-tree vlan 350 detail | i from|topology|VLAN
VLAN0350 is executing the rstp compatible Spanning Tree protocol
Number of topology changes 1157 last change occurred 0:35:39 ago <---
from Ethernet1/54 <---
Times: hold 1, topology change 35, notification 2
Timers: hello 0, topology change 0, notification 0
... Output snipped ...


BACKGROUND



The reason I found the STP recalculations is because we got so many complaints about the device connected to Nexus9000_2 Eth1/45 having 30-ish second outages over and over again. Configuring Nexus9000_2 Eth1/45 as spanning-tree port type edge trunk made the problem much less visible because STP moves into a forwarding state much faster with that port-type.



I checked and know that the interfaces in this diagram are not flapping.



QUESTION



Each of those switches says it received a topology change notification (TCN) from the other switch. That's not very helpful... and I don't want to band-aid the problem with spanning-tree port type edge trunk on port Eth1/45.



What is the best way to find the root cause of these STP topology changes using the tools available on Nexus 9000 switches?



Please don't respond with show spanning-tree internal event-history all or other show spanning-tree internal commands without explaining what exactly to look for in those commands.










share|improve this question
























  • Do they actually recalculate the spanning tree, or are they just flooding another switch's TC flagged BPDU? (while flushing their CAM tables)

    – Marc 'netztier' Luethi
    May 10 at 5:09













4












4








4








I have a nagging Rapid PVST problem on some Nexus 9000 switches. Rapid-PVST keeps recalculating 3 to 5 times an hour. We have in this topology (summarized):



 Edge Router Access Layer
+-------------+ +-------------+
| | Eth1/28 Eth1/54 | |
| Nexus9000_1 +-------------------------+ Nexus9000_2 |
| | Vlan350 | |
+-------------+ dot1q Trunk +-------------+
|Eth1/45 (dot1q trunk)
|
Something_Important


SHOW OUTPUT: Nexus9000_1



Nexus9000_1# sh spanning-tree vlan 350 detail | i from|topology|VLAN
VLAN0350 is executing the rstp compatible Spanning Tree protocol
Number of topology changes 1348 last change occurred 0:35:39 ago <---
from Ethernet1/28 <---
Times: hold 1, topology change 35, notification 2
Timers: hello 0, topology change 0, notification 0
... Output snipped ...


SHOW OUTPUT: Nexus9000_2



Nexus9000_2# sh spanning-tree vlan 350 detail | i from|topology|VLAN
VLAN0350 is executing the rstp compatible Spanning Tree protocol
Number of topology changes 1157 last change occurred 0:35:39 ago <---
from Ethernet1/54 <---
Times: hold 1, topology change 35, notification 2
Timers: hello 0, topology change 0, notification 0
... Output snipped ...


BACKGROUND



The reason I found the STP recalculations is because we got so many complaints about the device connected to Nexus9000_2 Eth1/45 having 30-ish second outages over and over again. Configuring Nexus9000_2 Eth1/45 as spanning-tree port type edge trunk made the problem much less visible because STP moves into a forwarding state much faster with that port-type.



I checked and know that the interfaces in this diagram are not flapping.



QUESTION



Each of those switches says it received a topology change notification (TCN) from the other switch. That's not very helpful... and I don't want to band-aid the problem with spanning-tree port type edge trunk on port Eth1/45.



What is the best way to find the root cause of these STP topology changes using the tools available on Nexus 9000 switches?



Please don't respond with show spanning-tree internal event-history all or other show spanning-tree internal commands without explaining what exactly to look for in those commands.










share|improve this question
















I have a nagging Rapid PVST problem on some Nexus 9000 switches. Rapid-PVST keeps recalculating 3 to 5 times an hour. We have in this topology (summarized):



 Edge Router Access Layer
+-------------+ +-------------+
| | Eth1/28 Eth1/54 | |
| Nexus9000_1 +-------------------------+ Nexus9000_2 |
| | Vlan350 | |
+-------------+ dot1q Trunk +-------------+
|Eth1/45 (dot1q trunk)
|
Something_Important


SHOW OUTPUT: Nexus9000_1



Nexus9000_1# sh spanning-tree vlan 350 detail | i from|topology|VLAN
VLAN0350 is executing the rstp compatible Spanning Tree protocol
Number of topology changes 1348 last change occurred 0:35:39 ago <---
from Ethernet1/28 <---
Times: hold 1, topology change 35, notification 2
Timers: hello 0, topology change 0, notification 0
... Output snipped ...


SHOW OUTPUT: Nexus9000_2



Nexus9000_2# sh spanning-tree vlan 350 detail | i from|topology|VLAN
VLAN0350 is executing the rstp compatible Spanning Tree protocol
Number of topology changes 1157 last change occurred 0:35:39 ago <---
from Ethernet1/54 <---
Times: hold 1, topology change 35, notification 2
Timers: hello 0, topology change 0, notification 0
... Output snipped ...


BACKGROUND



The reason I found the STP recalculations is because we got so many complaints about the device connected to Nexus9000_2 Eth1/45 having 30-ish second outages over and over again. Configuring Nexus9000_2 Eth1/45 as spanning-tree port type edge trunk made the problem much less visible because STP moves into a forwarding state much faster with that port-type.



I checked and know that the interfaces in this diagram are not flapping.



QUESTION



Each of those switches says it received a topology change notification (TCN) from the other switch. That's not very helpful... and I don't want to band-aid the problem with spanning-tree port type edge trunk on port Eth1/45.



What is the best way to find the root cause of these STP topology changes using the tools available on Nexus 9000 switches?



Please don't respond with show spanning-tree internal event-history all or other show spanning-tree internal commands without explaining what exactly to look for in those commands.







cisco spanning-tree cisco-nexus






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 10 at 22:06







Mike Pennington

















asked May 9 at 21:30









Mike PenningtonMike Pennington

27.1k1167140




27.1k1167140












  • Do they actually recalculate the spanning tree, or are they just flooding another switch's TC flagged BPDU? (while flushing their CAM tables)

    – Marc 'netztier' Luethi
    May 10 at 5:09

















  • Do they actually recalculate the spanning tree, or are they just flooding another switch's TC flagged BPDU? (while flushing their CAM tables)

    – Marc 'netztier' Luethi
    May 10 at 5:09
















Do they actually recalculate the spanning tree, or are they just flooding another switch's TC flagged BPDU? (while flushing their CAM tables)

– Marc 'netztier' Luethi
May 10 at 5:09





Do they actually recalculate the spanning tree, or are they just flooding another switch's TC flagged BPDU? (while flushing their CAM tables)

– Marc 'netztier' Luethi
May 10 at 5:09










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














In my case, I was able to solve the problem by turning on these debugs on Nexus9000_2:



  • debug spanning-tree rstp interface eth1/54

  • debug spanning-tree event interface eth1/54

  • debug spanning-tree bpdu_rx interface eth1/54

The next time a BPDU triggered a calculation, the debug gave me detailed information on what was happening on the switchport.



The output of this command was also useful: sh spanning-tree internal event-history all | begin VLAN0350






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Do tell what the ultimate problem was!

    – Ron Trunk
    May 10 at 1:49











  • vpc peer-switch configured on a non-RPVST root switch

    – Mike Pennington
    May 10 at 17:02











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "496"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59019%2ffinding-the-root-cause-of-spanning-tree-recalculations-on-cisco-nexus-9000s%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














In my case, I was able to solve the problem by turning on these debugs on Nexus9000_2:



  • debug spanning-tree rstp interface eth1/54

  • debug spanning-tree event interface eth1/54

  • debug spanning-tree bpdu_rx interface eth1/54

The next time a BPDU triggered a calculation, the debug gave me detailed information on what was happening on the switchport.



The output of this command was also useful: sh spanning-tree internal event-history all | begin VLAN0350






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Do tell what the ultimate problem was!

    – Ron Trunk
    May 10 at 1:49











  • vpc peer-switch configured on a non-RPVST root switch

    – Mike Pennington
    May 10 at 17:02















3














In my case, I was able to solve the problem by turning on these debugs on Nexus9000_2:



  • debug spanning-tree rstp interface eth1/54

  • debug spanning-tree event interface eth1/54

  • debug spanning-tree bpdu_rx interface eth1/54

The next time a BPDU triggered a calculation, the debug gave me detailed information on what was happening on the switchport.



The output of this command was also useful: sh spanning-tree internal event-history all | begin VLAN0350






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Do tell what the ultimate problem was!

    – Ron Trunk
    May 10 at 1:49











  • vpc peer-switch configured on a non-RPVST root switch

    – Mike Pennington
    May 10 at 17:02













3












3








3







In my case, I was able to solve the problem by turning on these debugs on Nexus9000_2:



  • debug spanning-tree rstp interface eth1/54

  • debug spanning-tree event interface eth1/54

  • debug spanning-tree bpdu_rx interface eth1/54

The next time a BPDU triggered a calculation, the debug gave me detailed information on what was happening on the switchport.



The output of this command was also useful: sh spanning-tree internal event-history all | begin VLAN0350






share|improve this answer















In my case, I was able to solve the problem by turning on these debugs on Nexus9000_2:



  • debug spanning-tree rstp interface eth1/54

  • debug spanning-tree event interface eth1/54

  • debug spanning-tree bpdu_rx interface eth1/54

The next time a BPDU triggered a calculation, the debug gave me detailed information on what was happening on the switchport.



The output of this command was also useful: sh spanning-tree internal event-history all | begin VLAN0350







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 10 at 2:56

























answered May 9 at 22:22









Mike PenningtonMike Pennington

27.1k1167140




27.1k1167140







  • 2





    Do tell what the ultimate problem was!

    – Ron Trunk
    May 10 at 1:49











  • vpc peer-switch configured on a non-RPVST root switch

    – Mike Pennington
    May 10 at 17:02












  • 2





    Do tell what the ultimate problem was!

    – Ron Trunk
    May 10 at 1:49











  • vpc peer-switch configured on a non-RPVST root switch

    – Mike Pennington
    May 10 at 17:02







2




2





Do tell what the ultimate problem was!

– Ron Trunk
May 10 at 1:49





Do tell what the ultimate problem was!

– Ron Trunk
May 10 at 1:49













vpc peer-switch configured on a non-RPVST root switch

– Mike Pennington
May 10 at 17:02





vpc peer-switch configured on a non-RPVST root switch

– Mike Pennington
May 10 at 17:02

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59019%2ffinding-the-root-cause-of-spanning-tree-recalculations-on-cisco-nexus-9000s%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to write a 12-bar blues melodyI-IV-V blues progressionHow to play the bridges in a standard blues progressionHow does Gdim7 fit in C# minor?question on a certain chord progressionMusicology of Melody12 bar blues, spread rhythm: alternative to 6th chord to avoid finger stretchChord progressions/ Root key/ MelodiesHow to put chords (POP-EDM) under a given lead vocal melody (starting from a good knowledge in music theory)Are there “rules” for improvising with the minor pentatonic scale over 12-bar shuffle?Confusion about blues scale and chords

What if the end-user didn't have the required library?What is setup.py?What is a clean, pythonic way to have multiple constructors in Python?What does Ruby have that Python doesn't, and vice versa?What is the reason for having '//' in Python?How do I create a namespace package in Python?How to package shared objects that python modules depend on?setuptools vs. distutils: why is distutils still a thing?Navigation in Windows 10 vs code not going to virtualenv library when the same library is installed at user levelPython create package for local usePackaging a project that uses multiple python versionsWhy is permission denied on pip install except for when “--user” is included at end of command?

Esgonzo ibérico Índice Descrición Distribución Hábitat Ameazas Notas Véxase tamén "Acerca dos nomes dos anfibios e réptiles galegos""Chalcides bedriagai"Chalcides bedriagai en Carrascal, L. M. Salvador, A. (Eds). Enciclopedia virtual de los vertebrados españoles. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid. España.Fotos