Number of words that can be made using all the letters of the word W, if Os as well as Is are separated is? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowNumber of rearrangements of the word “INDIVISIBILITY”How many words, with or without meaning, each of 3 vowels and 2 consonants can be formed from the letters of the word INVOLUTE?How many different words can be formed with the letters of 'SKYSCRAPERS' if A and E are together?Forming seven letter words by using the letters of the word $textSUCCESS$Total no. of words formed when similar letters are involvedNumber of ways to arrange $A,A,A,B,C,C$ such that no $2$ consecutive letters are the sameFind the total number of permutations in which letters of the word $ARRANGEMENT$ can be permuted so that two $E$s and two $R$s do not come together.Find the number of ways in which 6 boys and 6 girls can be seated in a row so that all the girls are never together.What is the number of arrangements in the word “EDUCATION” where vowels are never together?Probability that the first 2 letters are consonants when the letters of the word 'equilibrium' are rearranged

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?

Are there languages with no euphemisms?

Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?

Need some help with wall behind rangetop

Shade part of a Venn diagram

How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

Why here is plural "We went to the movies last night."

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?

Rotate a column

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

What is the point of a new vote on May's deal when the indicative votes suggest she will not win?

Why do remote companies require working in the US?

Natural language into sentence logic

How to make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?

What makes a siege story/plot interesting?

What's the point of interval inversion?

Why does C# sound extremely flat when saxophone is tuned to G?

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

Text adventure game code

How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?



Number of words that can be made using all the letters of the word W, if Os as well as Is are separated is?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowNumber of rearrangements of the word “INDIVISIBILITY”How many words, with or without meaning, each of 3 vowels and 2 consonants can be formed from the letters of the word INVOLUTE?How many different words can be formed with the letters of 'SKYSCRAPERS' if A and E are together?Forming seven letter words by using the letters of the word $textSUCCESS$Total no. of words formed when similar letters are involvedNumber of ways to arrange $A,A,A,B,C,C$ such that no $2$ consecutive letters are the sameFind the total number of permutations in which letters of the word $ARRANGEMENT$ can be permuted so that two $E$s and two $R$s do not come together.Find the number of ways in which 6 boys and 6 girls can be seated in a row so that all the girls are never together.What is the number of arrangements in the word “EDUCATION” where vowels are never together?Probability that the first 2 letters are consonants when the letters of the word 'equilibrium' are rearranged










6












$begingroup$


enter image description here



I am facing difficulty in solving the 18th Question from the above passage.



Attempt:



I have attempted it using principal of inclusion and exclusion.



Let n be the required number of ways.



$n = textTotal number of ways - Number of ways in which Os and Is are together$



$implies n = dfrac12!3!2!2! - dfrac11!2!3! - dfrac10!2!2!+ dfrac9!2!2! = 399 times 8!$



This gives $N = 399$ which is wrong. Can you please tell me why am I getting the wrong answer?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ answer given is option B
    $endgroup$
    – Abcd
    21 hours ago















6












$begingroup$


enter image description here



I am facing difficulty in solving the 18th Question from the above passage.



Attempt:



I have attempted it using principal of inclusion and exclusion.



Let n be the required number of ways.



$n = textTotal number of ways - Number of ways in which Os and Is are together$



$implies n = dfrac12!3!2!2! - dfrac11!2!3! - dfrac10!2!2!+ dfrac9!2!2! = 399 times 8!$



This gives $N = 399$ which is wrong. Can you please tell me why am I getting the wrong answer?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ answer given is option B
    $endgroup$
    – Abcd
    21 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


enter image description here



I am facing difficulty in solving the 18th Question from the above passage.



Attempt:



I have attempted it using principal of inclusion and exclusion.



Let n be the required number of ways.



$n = textTotal number of ways - Number of ways in which Os and Is are together$



$implies n = dfrac12!3!2!2! - dfrac11!2!3! - dfrac10!2!2!+ dfrac9!2!2! = 399 times 8!$



This gives $N = 399$ which is wrong. Can you please tell me why am I getting the wrong answer?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




enter image description here



I am facing difficulty in solving the 18th Question from the above passage.



Attempt:



I have attempted it using principal of inclusion and exclusion.



Let n be the required number of ways.



$n = textTotal number of ways - Number of ways in which Os and Is are together$



$implies n = dfrac12!3!2!2! - dfrac11!2!3! - dfrac10!2!2!+ dfrac9!2!2! = 399 times 8!$



This gives $N = 399$ which is wrong. Can you please tell me why am I getting the wrong answer?







combinatorics permutations combinations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 23 hours ago









AbcdAbcd

3,10931338




3,10931338







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ answer given is option B
    $endgroup$
    – Abcd
    21 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ answer given is option B
    $endgroup$
    – Abcd
    21 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
21 hours ago




$begingroup$
How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
21 hours ago












$begingroup$
@RobertZ answer given is option B
$endgroup$
– Abcd
21 hours ago




$begingroup$
@RobertZ answer given is option B
$endgroup$
– Abcd
21 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

Your mistake is not noticing that the I's can be non-separated two different ways: We can have all three of them together as III, but we can also have II in one place and I in another.



One way to calculate how many ways this can happen is to think of one pair II as a single letter, and the third I as a separate letter, and count the number of words we can make. This will count each III case twice: Once as I II, and once as II I. So we have to subtract the number of such cases once.



With this correction, the final calculation becomes
$$
overbracefrac12!3!2!2!^textAll words - overbracefrac11!3!2!^textO's not separate - overbraceleft(underbracefrac11!2!2!_textII and I - underbracefrac10!2!2!_textIIIright)^textI's not separate + overbraceleft(underbracefrac10!2!_textOO, II and I - underbracefrac9!2!_textOO and IIIright)^textNeither O's nor I's separate
$$

which turns out to be $8!cdot 228$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
    $endgroup$
    – Abcd
    21 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    20 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the MathJax magic!
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    18 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$

The letter $I$ appears three times. You have calculated the number of ways to arrange the letters so that the three copies of $I$ aren't all in the same place (and also the two $O$s are separated). However, "separated" here means that no two of them are together. Your count includes such "words" as STIILOCATINO, which should be excluded.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    How did you get each of the terms of $n$?



    • $frac12!3!2!2!$ : The number of ways of arranging the letters of SOLICITATION.


    • $frac11!2!3!$ : The number of ways in which the two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


    • $frac10!2!2!$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


    • $frac9!2!2!$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s and two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


    Well , the problem is this : the complement of this case, also includes the case where two $I$s can be together and the third can be separate. You have not neglected this case, and that's why you have an answer larger than the given answer.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165573%2fnumber-of-words-that-can-be-made-using-all-the-letters-of-the-word-w-if-os-as-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      11












      $begingroup$

      Your mistake is not noticing that the I's can be non-separated two different ways: We can have all three of them together as III, but we can also have II in one place and I in another.



      One way to calculate how many ways this can happen is to think of one pair II as a single letter, and the third I as a separate letter, and count the number of words we can make. This will count each III case twice: Once as I II, and once as II I. So we have to subtract the number of such cases once.



      With this correction, the final calculation becomes
      $$
      overbracefrac12!3!2!2!^textAll words - overbracefrac11!3!2!^textO's not separate - overbraceleft(underbracefrac11!2!2!_textII and I - underbracefrac10!2!2!_textIIIright)^textI's not separate + overbraceleft(underbracefrac10!2!_textOO, II and I - underbracefrac9!2!_textOO and IIIright)^textNeither O's nor I's separate
      $$

      which turns out to be $8!cdot 228$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
        $endgroup$
        – Abcd
        21 hours ago











      • $begingroup$
        @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
        $endgroup$
        – Arthur
        20 hours ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        +1 for the MathJax magic!
        $endgroup$
        – TonyK
        18 hours ago















      11












      $begingroup$

      Your mistake is not noticing that the I's can be non-separated two different ways: We can have all three of them together as III, but we can also have II in one place and I in another.



      One way to calculate how many ways this can happen is to think of one pair II as a single letter, and the third I as a separate letter, and count the number of words we can make. This will count each III case twice: Once as I II, and once as II I. So we have to subtract the number of such cases once.



      With this correction, the final calculation becomes
      $$
      overbracefrac12!3!2!2!^textAll words - overbracefrac11!3!2!^textO's not separate - overbraceleft(underbracefrac11!2!2!_textII and I - underbracefrac10!2!2!_textIIIright)^textI's not separate + overbraceleft(underbracefrac10!2!_textOO, II and I - underbracefrac9!2!_textOO and IIIright)^textNeither O's nor I's separate
      $$

      which turns out to be $8!cdot 228$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
        $endgroup$
        – Abcd
        21 hours ago











      • $begingroup$
        @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
        $endgroup$
        – Arthur
        20 hours ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        +1 for the MathJax magic!
        $endgroup$
        – TonyK
        18 hours ago













      11












      11








      11





      $begingroup$

      Your mistake is not noticing that the I's can be non-separated two different ways: We can have all three of them together as III, but we can also have II in one place and I in another.



      One way to calculate how many ways this can happen is to think of one pair II as a single letter, and the third I as a separate letter, and count the number of words we can make. This will count each III case twice: Once as I II, and once as II I. So we have to subtract the number of such cases once.



      With this correction, the final calculation becomes
      $$
      overbracefrac12!3!2!2!^textAll words - overbracefrac11!3!2!^textO's not separate - overbraceleft(underbracefrac11!2!2!_textII and I - underbracefrac10!2!2!_textIIIright)^textI's not separate + overbraceleft(underbracefrac10!2!_textOO, II and I - underbracefrac9!2!_textOO and IIIright)^textNeither O's nor I's separate
      $$

      which turns out to be $8!cdot 228$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Your mistake is not noticing that the I's can be non-separated two different ways: We can have all three of them together as III, but we can also have II in one place and I in another.



      One way to calculate how many ways this can happen is to think of one pair II as a single letter, and the third I as a separate letter, and count the number of words we can make. This will count each III case twice: Once as I II, and once as II I. So we have to subtract the number of such cases once.



      With this correction, the final calculation becomes
      $$
      overbracefrac12!3!2!2!^textAll words - overbracefrac11!3!2!^textO's not separate - overbraceleft(underbracefrac11!2!2!_textII and I - underbracefrac10!2!2!_textIIIright)^textI's not separate + overbraceleft(underbracefrac10!2!_textOO, II and I - underbracefrac9!2!_textOO and IIIright)^textNeither O's nor I's separate
      $$

      which turns out to be $8!cdot 228$.







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited 20 hours ago

























      answered 21 hours ago









      ArthurArthur

      120k7121206




      120k7121206











      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
        $endgroup$
        – Abcd
        21 hours ago











      • $begingroup$
        @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
        $endgroup$
        – Arthur
        20 hours ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        +1 for the MathJax magic!
        $endgroup$
        – TonyK
        18 hours ago
















      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
        $endgroup$
        – Abcd
        21 hours ago











      • $begingroup$
        @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
        $endgroup$
        – Arthur
        20 hours ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        +1 for the MathJax magic!
        $endgroup$
        – TonyK
        18 hours ago















      $begingroup$
      Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
      $endgroup$
      – Abcd
      21 hours ago





      $begingroup$
      Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
      $endgroup$
      – Abcd
      21 hours ago













      $begingroup$
      @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      20 hours ago





      $begingroup$
      @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      20 hours ago





      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      +1 for the MathJax magic!
      $endgroup$
      – TonyK
      18 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      +1 for the MathJax magic!
      $endgroup$
      – TonyK
      18 hours ago











      3












      $begingroup$

      The letter $I$ appears three times. You have calculated the number of ways to arrange the letters so that the three copies of $I$ aren't all in the same place (and also the two $O$s are separated). However, "separated" here means that no two of them are together. Your count includes such "words" as STIILOCATINO, which should be excluded.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        3












        $begingroup$

        The letter $I$ appears three times. You have calculated the number of ways to arrange the letters so that the three copies of $I$ aren't all in the same place (and also the two $O$s are separated). However, "separated" here means that no two of them are together. Your count includes such "words" as STIILOCATINO, which should be excluded.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          The letter $I$ appears three times. You have calculated the number of ways to arrange the letters so that the three copies of $I$ aren't all in the same place (and also the two $O$s are separated). However, "separated" here means that no two of them are together. Your count includes such "words" as STIILOCATINO, which should be excluded.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The letter $I$ appears three times. You have calculated the number of ways to arrange the letters so that the three copies of $I$ aren't all in the same place (and also the two $O$s are separated). However, "separated" here means that no two of them are together. Your count includes such "words" as STIILOCATINO, which should be excluded.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 21 hours ago









          jmerryjmerry

          16.8k11633




          16.8k11633





















              3












              $begingroup$

              How did you get each of the terms of $n$?



              • $frac12!3!2!2!$ : The number of ways of arranging the letters of SOLICITATION.


              • $frac11!2!3!$ : The number of ways in which the two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


              • $frac10!2!2!$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


              • $frac9!2!2!$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s and two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


              Well , the problem is this : the complement of this case, also includes the case where two $I$s can be together and the third can be separate. You have not neglected this case, and that's why you have an answer larger than the given answer.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                How did you get each of the terms of $n$?



                • $frac12!3!2!2!$ : The number of ways of arranging the letters of SOLICITATION.


                • $frac11!2!3!$ : The number of ways in which the two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                • $frac10!2!2!$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                • $frac9!2!2!$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s and two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                Well , the problem is this : the complement of this case, also includes the case where two $I$s can be together and the third can be separate. You have not neglected this case, and that's why you have an answer larger than the given answer.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  How did you get each of the terms of $n$?



                  • $frac12!3!2!2!$ : The number of ways of arranging the letters of SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac11!2!3!$ : The number of ways in which the two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac10!2!2!$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac9!2!2!$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s and two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                  Well , the problem is this : the complement of this case, also includes the case where two $I$s can be together and the third can be separate. You have not neglected this case, and that's why you have an answer larger than the given answer.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  How did you get each of the terms of $n$?



                  • $frac12!3!2!2!$ : The number of ways of arranging the letters of SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac11!2!3!$ : The number of ways in which the two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac10!2!2!$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac9!2!2!$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s and two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                  Well , the problem is this : the complement of this case, also includes the case where two $I$s can be together and the third can be separate. You have not neglected this case, and that's why you have an answer larger than the given answer.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 21 hours ago









                  астон вілла олоф мэллбэргастон вілла олоф мэллбэрг

                  40k33477




                  40k33477



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165573%2fnumber-of-words-that-can-be-made-using-all-the-letters-of-the-word-w-if-os-as-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      4jEDHlY2,8czxJVQCoGD4YoZ714dxSZyUuU5 PhGbTBXngbIBL 3AuoleFNnt7Jlvnc5OjJshgjjp3b9NKZUwMsCMObCyr4
                      Rw FI0Yrizj9o 49JdfP 2n6MKd 2 G8l8v,tHR8DI 8Mg2rOqPXRAsrXwBxebbLL3NVToTsSgnT1ki9jYFrUlE,wkjKX

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

                      Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                      Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020