How to write capital alpha?What is the “correct” way of embedding text into math mode?Which package includes Rho? (Big rho)Can I typeset greek letters in text mode using Latin Modern Fonts?Changing the Greek math font with mathspecHow to use `mathrm` with capital greek letter and `newtx` package?Charter and Helvetica with greek letters in LaTeX or XeLaTeXnon-italic Greek lettersUse smart greek letters recognizing mathrm with mathastext-packageHow to tell XeLaTeX to use one font for italic math and another font for bold math?mtpro2 + baskerville in mathExport Greek font (italic, upright, bold) from 'newtxmath' package with libertine option

What are the characteristics of a typeless programming language?

Converting a sprinkler system's 24V AC outputs to 3.3V DC logic inputs

Pre-plastic human skin alternative

How to limit Drive Letters Windows assigns to new removable USB drives

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

Multiple options vs single option UI

Is there any official lore on the Far Realm?

Implications of cigar-shaped bodies having rings?

How to denote matrix elements succinctly?

Why do games have consumables?

A strange hotel

Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Aligning equation numbers vertically

Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?

Is there a way to generate a list of distinct numbers such that no two subsets ever have an equal sum?

Extension of 2-adic valuation to the real numbers

Checks user level and limit the data before saving it to mongoDB

If a planet has 3 moons, is it possible to have triple Full/New Moons at once?

How to fry ground beef so it is well-browned

Two field separators (colon and space) in awk

A ​Note ​on ​N!

Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?



How to write capital alpha?


What is the “correct” way of embedding text into math mode?Which package includes Rho? (Big rho)Can I typeset greek letters in text mode using Latin Modern Fonts?Changing the Greek math font with mathspecHow to use `mathrm` with capital greek letter and `newtx` package?Charter and Helvetica with greek letters in LaTeX or XeLaTeXnon-italic Greek lettersUse smart greek letters recognizing mathrm with mathastext-packageHow to tell XeLaTeX to use one font for italic math and another font for bold math?mtpro2 + baskerville in mathExport Greek font (italic, upright, bold) from 'newtxmath' package with libertine option













15















Unfortunately, the command Alpha does not produce capital version of alpha (as one might expect in analogy with how, say, Pi produces capital pi). It so happens that the capital alpha looks rather similar to A, but that doesn't mean that there aren't situations where I would like to use capital alpha in a formula. For instance, suppose I already have pi which belongs to a set Pi, and then alpha comes along and I need a name for the set of its possible values.



What is the best way to write capital alpha?



The obvious first attempt is to just write A. But it's not right - A produces italic A, while Greek letters are by default not italic. Would mathrmA do the trick, or is there some subtle issue I'm not noticing? Is there a package that will save me the work of defining all capital letters by hand?










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    Yes, it is mathrmA.

    – JouleV
    Apr 19 at 13:21











  • Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

    – Especially Lime
    Apr 20 at 8:27






  • 3





    How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 10:02






  • 1





    @egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

    – Jakub Konieczny
    Apr 20 at 20:53















15















Unfortunately, the command Alpha does not produce capital version of alpha (as one might expect in analogy with how, say, Pi produces capital pi). It so happens that the capital alpha looks rather similar to A, but that doesn't mean that there aren't situations where I would like to use capital alpha in a formula. For instance, suppose I already have pi which belongs to a set Pi, and then alpha comes along and I need a name for the set of its possible values.



What is the best way to write capital alpha?



The obvious first attempt is to just write A. But it's not right - A produces italic A, while Greek letters are by default not italic. Would mathrmA do the trick, or is there some subtle issue I'm not noticing? Is there a package that will save me the work of defining all capital letters by hand?










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    Yes, it is mathrmA.

    – JouleV
    Apr 19 at 13:21











  • Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

    – Especially Lime
    Apr 20 at 8:27






  • 3





    How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 10:02






  • 1





    @egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

    – Jakub Konieczny
    Apr 20 at 20:53













15












15








15


1






Unfortunately, the command Alpha does not produce capital version of alpha (as one might expect in analogy with how, say, Pi produces capital pi). It so happens that the capital alpha looks rather similar to A, but that doesn't mean that there aren't situations where I would like to use capital alpha in a formula. For instance, suppose I already have pi which belongs to a set Pi, and then alpha comes along and I need a name for the set of its possible values.



What is the best way to write capital alpha?



The obvious first attempt is to just write A. But it's not right - A produces italic A, while Greek letters are by default not italic. Would mathrmA do the trick, or is there some subtle issue I'm not noticing? Is there a package that will save me the work of defining all capital letters by hand?










share|improve this question
















Unfortunately, the command Alpha does not produce capital version of alpha (as one might expect in analogy with how, say, Pi produces capital pi). It so happens that the capital alpha looks rather similar to A, but that doesn't mean that there aren't situations where I would like to use capital alpha in a formula. For instance, suppose I already have pi which belongs to a set Pi, and then alpha comes along and I need a name for the set of its possible values.



What is the best way to write capital alpha?



The obvious first attempt is to just write A. But it's not right - A produces italic A, while Greek letters are by default not italic. Would mathrmA do the trick, or is there some subtle issue I'm not noticing? Is there a package that will save me the work of defining all capital letters by hand?







fonts greek






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 19 at 13:27









Sigur

26.3k457143




26.3k457143










asked Apr 19 at 13:17









Jakub KoniecznyJakub Konieczny

322212




322212







  • 6





    Yes, it is mathrmA.

    – JouleV
    Apr 19 at 13:21











  • Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

    – Especially Lime
    Apr 20 at 8:27






  • 3





    How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 10:02






  • 1





    @egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

    – Jakub Konieczny
    Apr 20 at 20:53












  • 6





    Yes, it is mathrmA.

    – JouleV
    Apr 19 at 13:21











  • Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

    – Especially Lime
    Apr 20 at 8:27






  • 3





    How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 10:02






  • 1





    @egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

    – Jakub Konieczny
    Apr 20 at 20:53







6




6





Yes, it is mathrmA.

– JouleV
Apr 19 at 13:21





Yes, it is mathrmA.

– JouleV
Apr 19 at 13:21













Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

– Especially Lime
Apr 20 at 8:27





Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

– Especially Lime
Apr 20 at 8:27




3




3





How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

– egreg
Apr 20 at 10:02





How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

– egreg
Apr 20 at 10:02




1




1





@egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

– Jakub Konieczny
Apr 20 at 20:53





@egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

– Jakub Konieczny
Apr 20 at 20:53










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















31














If you're using LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX, you can use the unicode-math package. It defines all uppercase Greek letters:



documentclassarticle
usepackageunicode-math
begindocument
$Alpha+Beta=Gamma$.
enddocument


The result is:



enter image description here



This way has an advantage in that one can change the style of the letters by altering the unicode-math options. For example usepackage[math-style=ISO]unicode-math without any other changes yields:



enter image description here



Also, this way alpha can be copied&pasted from the resulting PDF.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:37






  • 26





    @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

    – Davislor
    Apr 19 at 18:45







  • 11





    @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

    – alephzero
    Apr 19 at 20:19






  • 6





    +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

    – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
    Apr 19 at 21:25






  • 6





    @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

    – AJFarmar
    Apr 20 at 14:33


















17














Screenshot from lshort.pdf (The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e):



enter image description here



So it is simply mathrmA.



documentclassstandalone
newcommandAlphamathrmA
begindocument
$Alpha+Pi=Gamma$
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:36


















8














I would recommend unicode-math and Sergei Golovan’s solution if you are able to use it. Fewer and fewer publishers force you to use PDFTeX.



Here is a PDFTeX-compatible solution that produces a Greek Α and Β instead of a Latin A and B:



documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackage[LGR, T1]fontenc
usepackage[utf8]inputenc

usepackagelmodern, amsmath

newcommandmupAlphamathordtext%
fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textAlpha
newcommandmupBetamathordtext%
fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textBeta

begindocument
( mupAlpha + mupBeta = Gamma )
enddocument


Latin Modern Font Sample



I chose the names mupAlpha and mupBeta, which are compatible with unicode-math, because they always produce a regular-weight, upright letter. It would also be possible to define italic mitAlpha and bold mbfAlpha by inserting itshape or bfseries. Or you could call it Alpha.



Another alternative is to declare LGR-encoded symbol alphabets and DeclareMathSymbol, but be careful you don’t run out of math alphabets, which are a limited resource in the legacy toolchain. There are a number of packages that define Greek math-mode fonts, including upgreek. Both mathastext and isomath have options to load a LGR font for your Greek letters in math mode.



In theory, you could try the alphabeta package to use commands such as Alpha in either text or math mode, and also insert the Unicode characters in math mode. However, it produces inconsistent results: Α + Β = Γ. In practice, if you want to mix different scripts, you’re much better off with Unicode and the modern toolchain designed for that.






share|improve this answer

























  • Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 9:50












  • @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

    – Davislor
    Apr 20 at 10:11


















5














This works with the default Computer Modern fonts. A different font family should be chosen if the font is different (and it should have support for the LGR encoding).



I redefined also Delta because the correspondence when copying maps the standard Delta to U+2206 INCREMENT.



documentclassarticle
usepackage[LGR,T1]fontenc % or OT1

DeclareSymbolFontupgreekLGRcmrmn
SetSymbolFontupgreekboldLGRcmrbxn

DeclareMathSymbolAlphamathordupgreek`A
DeclareMathSymbolBetamathordupgreek`B
DeclareMathSymbolDeltamathordupgreek`D
DeclareMathSymbolEpsilonmathordupgreek`E
DeclareMathSymbolZetamathordupgreek`Z
DeclareMathSymbolEtamathordupgreek`H
DeclareMathSymbolIotamathordupgreek`I
DeclareMathSymbolKappamathordupgreek`K
DeclareMathSymbolMumathordupgreek`M
DeclareMathSymbolNumathordupgreek`N
DeclareMathSymbolOmicronmathordupgreek`O
DeclareMathSymbolRhomathordupgreek`R
DeclareMathSymbolTaumathordupgreek`T
DeclareMathSymbolChimathordupgreek`Q


begindocument

$AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMu$

$NuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega$

mathversionbold$AlphaBetaGammaDelta$

enddocument


You could also avoid the dependency from LGR, but in this case you have to set up a font family in the U encoding.



enter image description here



Below what I get by copy-paste:



ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜ ΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ ΑΒΓΔ


If you define Alpha as mathrmA you just get the same glyph, but upon copying it would be A.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485593%2fhow-to-write-capital-alpha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    31














    If you're using LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX, you can use the unicode-math package. It defines all uppercase Greek letters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageunicode-math
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Beta=Gamma$.
    enddocument


    The result is:



    enter image description here



    This way has an advantage in that one can change the style of the letters by altering the unicode-math options. For example usepackage[math-style=ISO]unicode-math without any other changes yields:



    enter image description here



    Also, this way alpha can be copied&pasted from the resulting PDF.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:37






    • 26





      @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

      – Davislor
      Apr 19 at 18:45







    • 11





      @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

      – alephzero
      Apr 19 at 20:19






    • 6





      +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

      – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
      Apr 19 at 21:25






    • 6





      @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

      – AJFarmar
      Apr 20 at 14:33















    31














    If you're using LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX, you can use the unicode-math package. It defines all uppercase Greek letters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageunicode-math
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Beta=Gamma$.
    enddocument


    The result is:



    enter image description here



    This way has an advantage in that one can change the style of the letters by altering the unicode-math options. For example usepackage[math-style=ISO]unicode-math without any other changes yields:



    enter image description here



    Also, this way alpha can be copied&pasted from the resulting PDF.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:37






    • 26





      @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

      – Davislor
      Apr 19 at 18:45







    • 11





      @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

      – alephzero
      Apr 19 at 20:19






    • 6





      +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

      – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
      Apr 19 at 21:25






    • 6





      @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

      – AJFarmar
      Apr 20 at 14:33













    31












    31








    31







    If you're using LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX, you can use the unicode-math package. It defines all uppercase Greek letters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageunicode-math
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Beta=Gamma$.
    enddocument


    The result is:



    enter image description here



    This way has an advantage in that one can change the style of the letters by altering the unicode-math options. For example usepackage[math-style=ISO]unicode-math without any other changes yields:



    enter image description here



    Also, this way alpha can be copied&pasted from the resulting PDF.






    share|improve this answer













    If you're using LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX, you can use the unicode-math package. It defines all uppercase Greek letters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageunicode-math
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Beta=Gamma$.
    enddocument


    The result is:



    enter image description here



    This way has an advantage in that one can change the style of the letters by altering the unicode-math options. For example usepackage[math-style=ISO]unicode-math without any other changes yields:



    enter image description here



    Also, this way alpha can be copied&pasted from the resulting PDF.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 19 at 14:00









    Sergei GolovanSergei Golovan

    4,8331716




    4,8331716







    • 1





      -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:37






    • 26





      @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

      – Davislor
      Apr 19 at 18:45







    • 11





      @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

      – alephzero
      Apr 19 at 20:19






    • 6





      +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

      – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
      Apr 19 at 21:25






    • 6





      @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

      – AJFarmar
      Apr 20 at 14:33












    • 1





      -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:37






    • 26





      @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

      – Davislor
      Apr 19 at 18:45







    • 11





      @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

      – alephzero
      Apr 19 at 20:19






    • 6





      +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

      – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
      Apr 19 at 21:25






    • 6





      @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

      – AJFarmar
      Apr 20 at 14:33







    1




    1





    -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:37





    -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:37




    26




    26





    @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

    – Davislor
    Apr 19 at 18:45






    @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

    – Davislor
    Apr 19 at 18:45





    11




    11





    @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

    – alephzero
    Apr 19 at 20:19





    @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

    – alephzero
    Apr 19 at 20:19




    6




    6





    +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

    – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
    Apr 19 at 21:25





    +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

    – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
    Apr 19 at 21:25




    6




    6





    @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

    – AJFarmar
    Apr 20 at 14:33





    @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

    – AJFarmar
    Apr 20 at 14:33











    17














    Screenshot from lshort.pdf (The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e):



    enter image description here



    So it is simply mathrmA.



    documentclassstandalone
    newcommandAlphamathrmA
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Pi=Gamma$
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:36















    17














    Screenshot from lshort.pdf (The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e):



    enter image description here



    So it is simply mathrmA.



    documentclassstandalone
    newcommandAlphamathrmA
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Pi=Gamma$
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:36













    17












    17








    17







    Screenshot from lshort.pdf (The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e):



    enter image description here



    So it is simply mathrmA.



    documentclassstandalone
    newcommandAlphamathrmA
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Pi=Gamma$
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer













    Screenshot from lshort.pdf (The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e):



    enter image description here



    So it is simply mathrmA.



    documentclassstandalone
    newcommandAlphamathrmA
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Pi=Gamma$
    enddocument


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 19 at 13:26









    JouleVJouleV

    16.1k22667




    16.1k22667







    • 3





      +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:36












    • 3





      +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:36







    3




    3





    +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:36





    +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:36











    8














    I would recommend unicode-math and Sergei Golovan’s solution if you are able to use it. Fewer and fewer publishers force you to use PDFTeX.



    Here is a PDFTeX-compatible solution that produces a Greek Α and Β instead of a Latin A and B:



    documentclass[varwidth]standalone
    usepackage[LGR, T1]fontenc
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc

    usepackagelmodern, amsmath

    newcommandmupAlphamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textAlpha
    newcommandmupBetamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textBeta

    begindocument
    ( mupAlpha + mupBeta = Gamma )
    enddocument


    Latin Modern Font Sample



    I chose the names mupAlpha and mupBeta, which are compatible with unicode-math, because they always produce a regular-weight, upright letter. It would also be possible to define italic mitAlpha and bold mbfAlpha by inserting itshape or bfseries. Or you could call it Alpha.



    Another alternative is to declare LGR-encoded symbol alphabets and DeclareMathSymbol, but be careful you don’t run out of math alphabets, which are a limited resource in the legacy toolchain. There are a number of packages that define Greek math-mode fonts, including upgreek. Both mathastext and isomath have options to load a LGR font for your Greek letters in math mode.



    In theory, you could try the alphabeta package to use commands such as Alpha in either text or math mode, and also insert the Unicode characters in math mode. However, it produces inconsistent results: Α + Β = Γ. In practice, if you want to mix different scripts, you’re much better off with Unicode and the modern toolchain designed for that.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

      – egreg
      Apr 20 at 9:50












    • @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

      – Davislor
      Apr 20 at 10:11















    8














    I would recommend unicode-math and Sergei Golovan’s solution if you are able to use it. Fewer and fewer publishers force you to use PDFTeX.



    Here is a PDFTeX-compatible solution that produces a Greek Α and Β instead of a Latin A and B:



    documentclass[varwidth]standalone
    usepackage[LGR, T1]fontenc
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc

    usepackagelmodern, amsmath

    newcommandmupAlphamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textAlpha
    newcommandmupBetamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textBeta

    begindocument
    ( mupAlpha + mupBeta = Gamma )
    enddocument


    Latin Modern Font Sample



    I chose the names mupAlpha and mupBeta, which are compatible with unicode-math, because they always produce a regular-weight, upright letter. It would also be possible to define italic mitAlpha and bold mbfAlpha by inserting itshape or bfseries. Or you could call it Alpha.



    Another alternative is to declare LGR-encoded symbol alphabets and DeclareMathSymbol, but be careful you don’t run out of math alphabets, which are a limited resource in the legacy toolchain. There are a number of packages that define Greek math-mode fonts, including upgreek. Both mathastext and isomath have options to load a LGR font for your Greek letters in math mode.



    In theory, you could try the alphabeta package to use commands such as Alpha in either text or math mode, and also insert the Unicode characters in math mode. However, it produces inconsistent results: Α + Β = Γ. In practice, if you want to mix different scripts, you’re much better off with Unicode and the modern toolchain designed for that.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

      – egreg
      Apr 20 at 9:50












    • @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

      – Davislor
      Apr 20 at 10:11













    8












    8








    8







    I would recommend unicode-math and Sergei Golovan’s solution if you are able to use it. Fewer and fewer publishers force you to use PDFTeX.



    Here is a PDFTeX-compatible solution that produces a Greek Α and Β instead of a Latin A and B:



    documentclass[varwidth]standalone
    usepackage[LGR, T1]fontenc
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc

    usepackagelmodern, amsmath

    newcommandmupAlphamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textAlpha
    newcommandmupBetamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textBeta

    begindocument
    ( mupAlpha + mupBeta = Gamma )
    enddocument


    Latin Modern Font Sample



    I chose the names mupAlpha and mupBeta, which are compatible with unicode-math, because they always produce a regular-weight, upright letter. It would also be possible to define italic mitAlpha and bold mbfAlpha by inserting itshape or bfseries. Or you could call it Alpha.



    Another alternative is to declare LGR-encoded symbol alphabets and DeclareMathSymbol, but be careful you don’t run out of math alphabets, which are a limited resource in the legacy toolchain. There are a number of packages that define Greek math-mode fonts, including upgreek. Both mathastext and isomath have options to load a LGR font for your Greek letters in math mode.



    In theory, you could try the alphabeta package to use commands such as Alpha in either text or math mode, and also insert the Unicode characters in math mode. However, it produces inconsistent results: Α + Β = Γ. In practice, if you want to mix different scripts, you’re much better off with Unicode and the modern toolchain designed for that.






    share|improve this answer















    I would recommend unicode-math and Sergei Golovan’s solution if you are able to use it. Fewer and fewer publishers force you to use PDFTeX.



    Here is a PDFTeX-compatible solution that produces a Greek Α and Β instead of a Latin A and B:



    documentclass[varwidth]standalone
    usepackage[LGR, T1]fontenc
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc

    usepackagelmodern, amsmath

    newcommandmupAlphamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textAlpha
    newcommandmupBetamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textBeta

    begindocument
    ( mupAlpha + mupBeta = Gamma )
    enddocument


    Latin Modern Font Sample



    I chose the names mupAlpha and mupBeta, which are compatible with unicode-math, because they always produce a regular-weight, upright letter. It would also be possible to define italic mitAlpha and bold mbfAlpha by inserting itshape or bfseries. Or you could call it Alpha.



    Another alternative is to declare LGR-encoded symbol alphabets and DeclareMathSymbol, but be careful you don’t run out of math alphabets, which are a limited resource in the legacy toolchain. There are a number of packages that define Greek math-mode fonts, including upgreek. Both mathastext and isomath have options to load a LGR font for your Greek letters in math mode.



    In theory, you could try the alphabeta package to use commands such as Alpha in either text or math mode, and also insert the Unicode characters in math mode. However, it produces inconsistent results: Α + Β = Γ. In practice, if you want to mix different scripts, you’re much better off with Unicode and the modern toolchain designed for that.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 20 at 10:10

























    answered Apr 19 at 19:52









    DavislorDavislor

    7,6691433




    7,6691433












    • Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

      – egreg
      Apr 20 at 9:50












    • @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

      – Davislor
      Apr 20 at 10:11

















    • Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

      – egreg
      Apr 20 at 9:50












    • @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

      – Davislor
      Apr 20 at 10:11
















    Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 9:50






    Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 9:50














    @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

    – Davislor
    Apr 20 at 10:11





    @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

    – Davislor
    Apr 20 at 10:11











    5














    This works with the default Computer Modern fonts. A different font family should be chosen if the font is different (and it should have support for the LGR encoding).



    I redefined also Delta because the correspondence when copying maps the standard Delta to U+2206 INCREMENT.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[LGR,T1]fontenc % or OT1

    DeclareSymbolFontupgreekLGRcmrmn
    SetSymbolFontupgreekboldLGRcmrbxn

    DeclareMathSymbolAlphamathordupgreek`A
    DeclareMathSymbolBetamathordupgreek`B
    DeclareMathSymbolDeltamathordupgreek`D
    DeclareMathSymbolEpsilonmathordupgreek`E
    DeclareMathSymbolZetamathordupgreek`Z
    DeclareMathSymbolEtamathordupgreek`H
    DeclareMathSymbolIotamathordupgreek`I
    DeclareMathSymbolKappamathordupgreek`K
    DeclareMathSymbolMumathordupgreek`M
    DeclareMathSymbolNumathordupgreek`N
    DeclareMathSymbolOmicronmathordupgreek`O
    DeclareMathSymbolRhomathordupgreek`R
    DeclareMathSymbolTaumathordupgreek`T
    DeclareMathSymbolChimathordupgreek`Q


    begindocument

    $AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMu$

    $NuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega$

    mathversionbold$AlphaBetaGammaDelta$

    enddocument


    You could also avoid the dependency from LGR, but in this case you have to set up a font family in the U encoding.



    enter image description here



    Below what I get by copy-paste:



    ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜ ΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ ΑΒΓΔ


    If you define Alpha as mathrmA you just get the same glyph, but upon copying it would be A.






    share|improve this answer



























      5














      This works with the default Computer Modern fonts. A different font family should be chosen if the font is different (and it should have support for the LGR encoding).



      I redefined also Delta because the correspondence when copying maps the standard Delta to U+2206 INCREMENT.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackage[LGR,T1]fontenc % or OT1

      DeclareSymbolFontupgreekLGRcmrmn
      SetSymbolFontupgreekboldLGRcmrbxn

      DeclareMathSymbolAlphamathordupgreek`A
      DeclareMathSymbolBetamathordupgreek`B
      DeclareMathSymbolDeltamathordupgreek`D
      DeclareMathSymbolEpsilonmathordupgreek`E
      DeclareMathSymbolZetamathordupgreek`Z
      DeclareMathSymbolEtamathordupgreek`H
      DeclareMathSymbolIotamathordupgreek`I
      DeclareMathSymbolKappamathordupgreek`K
      DeclareMathSymbolMumathordupgreek`M
      DeclareMathSymbolNumathordupgreek`N
      DeclareMathSymbolOmicronmathordupgreek`O
      DeclareMathSymbolRhomathordupgreek`R
      DeclareMathSymbolTaumathordupgreek`T
      DeclareMathSymbolChimathordupgreek`Q


      begindocument

      $AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMu$

      $NuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega$

      mathversionbold$AlphaBetaGammaDelta$

      enddocument


      You could also avoid the dependency from LGR, but in this case you have to set up a font family in the U encoding.



      enter image description here



      Below what I get by copy-paste:



      ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜ ΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ ΑΒΓΔ


      If you define Alpha as mathrmA you just get the same glyph, but upon copying it would be A.






      share|improve this answer

























        5












        5








        5







        This works with the default Computer Modern fonts. A different font family should be chosen if the font is different (and it should have support for the LGR encoding).



        I redefined also Delta because the correspondence when copying maps the standard Delta to U+2206 INCREMENT.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackage[LGR,T1]fontenc % or OT1

        DeclareSymbolFontupgreekLGRcmrmn
        SetSymbolFontupgreekboldLGRcmrbxn

        DeclareMathSymbolAlphamathordupgreek`A
        DeclareMathSymbolBetamathordupgreek`B
        DeclareMathSymbolDeltamathordupgreek`D
        DeclareMathSymbolEpsilonmathordupgreek`E
        DeclareMathSymbolZetamathordupgreek`Z
        DeclareMathSymbolEtamathordupgreek`H
        DeclareMathSymbolIotamathordupgreek`I
        DeclareMathSymbolKappamathordupgreek`K
        DeclareMathSymbolMumathordupgreek`M
        DeclareMathSymbolNumathordupgreek`N
        DeclareMathSymbolOmicronmathordupgreek`O
        DeclareMathSymbolRhomathordupgreek`R
        DeclareMathSymbolTaumathordupgreek`T
        DeclareMathSymbolChimathordupgreek`Q


        begindocument

        $AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMu$

        $NuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega$

        mathversionbold$AlphaBetaGammaDelta$

        enddocument


        You could also avoid the dependency from LGR, but in this case you have to set up a font family in the U encoding.



        enter image description here



        Below what I get by copy-paste:



        ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜ ΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ ΑΒΓΔ


        If you define Alpha as mathrmA you just get the same glyph, but upon copying it would be A.






        share|improve this answer













        This works with the default Computer Modern fonts. A different font family should be chosen if the font is different (and it should have support for the LGR encoding).



        I redefined also Delta because the correspondence when copying maps the standard Delta to U+2206 INCREMENT.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackage[LGR,T1]fontenc % or OT1

        DeclareSymbolFontupgreekLGRcmrmn
        SetSymbolFontupgreekboldLGRcmrbxn

        DeclareMathSymbolAlphamathordupgreek`A
        DeclareMathSymbolBetamathordupgreek`B
        DeclareMathSymbolDeltamathordupgreek`D
        DeclareMathSymbolEpsilonmathordupgreek`E
        DeclareMathSymbolZetamathordupgreek`Z
        DeclareMathSymbolEtamathordupgreek`H
        DeclareMathSymbolIotamathordupgreek`I
        DeclareMathSymbolKappamathordupgreek`K
        DeclareMathSymbolMumathordupgreek`M
        DeclareMathSymbolNumathordupgreek`N
        DeclareMathSymbolOmicronmathordupgreek`O
        DeclareMathSymbolRhomathordupgreek`R
        DeclareMathSymbolTaumathordupgreek`T
        DeclareMathSymbolChimathordupgreek`Q


        begindocument

        $AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMu$

        $NuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega$

        mathversionbold$AlphaBetaGammaDelta$

        enddocument


        You could also avoid the dependency from LGR, but in this case you have to set up a font family in the U encoding.



        enter image description here



        Below what I get by copy-paste:



        ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜ ΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ ΑΒΓΔ


        If you define Alpha as mathrmA you just get the same glyph, but upon copying it would be A.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 20 at 21:56









        egregegreg

        737k8919373265




        737k8919373265



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485593%2fhow-to-write-capital-alpha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020