How to write capital alpha?What is the “correct” way of embedding text into math mode?Which package includes Rho? (Big rho)Can I typeset greek letters in text mode using Latin Modern Fonts?Changing the Greek math font with mathspecHow to use `mathrm` with capital greek letter and `newtx` package?Charter and Helvetica with greek letters in LaTeX or XeLaTeXnon-italic Greek lettersUse smart greek letters recognizing mathrm with mathastext-packageHow to tell XeLaTeX to use one font for italic math and another font for bold math?mtpro2 + baskerville in mathExport Greek font (italic, upright, bold) from 'newtxmath' package with libertine option

What are the characteristics of a typeless programming language?

Converting a sprinkler system's 24V AC outputs to 3.3V DC logic inputs

Pre-plastic human skin alternative

How to limit Drive Letters Windows assigns to new removable USB drives

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

Multiple options vs single option UI

Is there any official lore on the Far Realm?

Implications of cigar-shaped bodies having rings?

How to denote matrix elements succinctly?

Why do games have consumables?

A strange hotel

Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Aligning equation numbers vertically

Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?

Is there a way to generate a list of distinct numbers such that no two subsets ever have an equal sum?

Extension of 2-adic valuation to the real numbers

Checks user level and limit the data before saving it to mongoDB

If a planet has 3 moons, is it possible to have triple Full/New Moons at once?

How to fry ground beef so it is well-browned

Two field separators (colon and space) in awk

A ​Note ​on ​N!

Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?



How to write capital alpha?


What is the “correct” way of embedding text into math mode?Which package includes Rho? (Big rho)Can I typeset greek letters in text mode using Latin Modern Fonts?Changing the Greek math font with mathspecHow to use `mathrm` with capital greek letter and `newtx` package?Charter and Helvetica with greek letters in LaTeX or XeLaTeXnon-italic Greek lettersUse smart greek letters recognizing mathrm with mathastext-packageHow to tell XeLaTeX to use one font for italic math and another font for bold math?mtpro2 + baskerville in mathExport Greek font (italic, upright, bold) from 'newtxmath' package with libertine option













15















Unfortunately, the command Alpha does not produce capital version of alpha (as one might expect in analogy with how, say, Pi produces capital pi). It so happens that the capital alpha looks rather similar to A, but that doesn't mean that there aren't situations where I would like to use capital alpha in a formula. For instance, suppose I already have pi which belongs to a set Pi, and then alpha comes along and I need a name for the set of its possible values.



What is the best way to write capital alpha?



The obvious first attempt is to just write A. But it's not right - A produces italic A, while Greek letters are by default not italic. Would mathrmA do the trick, or is there some subtle issue I'm not noticing? Is there a package that will save me the work of defining all capital letters by hand?










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    Yes, it is mathrmA.

    – JouleV
    Apr 19 at 13:21











  • Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

    – Especially Lime
    Apr 20 at 8:27






  • 3





    How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 10:02






  • 1





    @egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

    – Jakub Konieczny
    Apr 20 at 20:53















15















Unfortunately, the command Alpha does not produce capital version of alpha (as one might expect in analogy with how, say, Pi produces capital pi). It so happens that the capital alpha looks rather similar to A, but that doesn't mean that there aren't situations where I would like to use capital alpha in a formula. For instance, suppose I already have pi which belongs to a set Pi, and then alpha comes along and I need a name for the set of its possible values.



What is the best way to write capital alpha?



The obvious first attempt is to just write A. But it's not right - A produces italic A, while Greek letters are by default not italic. Would mathrmA do the trick, or is there some subtle issue I'm not noticing? Is there a package that will save me the work of defining all capital letters by hand?










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    Yes, it is mathrmA.

    – JouleV
    Apr 19 at 13:21











  • Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

    – Especially Lime
    Apr 20 at 8:27






  • 3





    How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 10:02






  • 1





    @egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

    – Jakub Konieczny
    Apr 20 at 20:53













15












15








15


1






Unfortunately, the command Alpha does not produce capital version of alpha (as one might expect in analogy with how, say, Pi produces capital pi). It so happens that the capital alpha looks rather similar to A, but that doesn't mean that there aren't situations where I would like to use capital alpha in a formula. For instance, suppose I already have pi which belongs to a set Pi, and then alpha comes along and I need a name for the set of its possible values.



What is the best way to write capital alpha?



The obvious first attempt is to just write A. But it's not right - A produces italic A, while Greek letters are by default not italic. Would mathrmA do the trick, or is there some subtle issue I'm not noticing? Is there a package that will save me the work of defining all capital letters by hand?










share|improve this question
















Unfortunately, the command Alpha does not produce capital version of alpha (as one might expect in analogy with how, say, Pi produces capital pi). It so happens that the capital alpha looks rather similar to A, but that doesn't mean that there aren't situations where I would like to use capital alpha in a formula. For instance, suppose I already have pi which belongs to a set Pi, and then alpha comes along and I need a name for the set of its possible values.



What is the best way to write capital alpha?



The obvious first attempt is to just write A. But it's not right - A produces italic A, while Greek letters are by default not italic. Would mathrmA do the trick, or is there some subtle issue I'm not noticing? Is there a package that will save me the work of defining all capital letters by hand?







fonts greek






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 19 at 13:27









Sigur

26.3k457143




26.3k457143










asked Apr 19 at 13:17









Jakub KoniecznyJakub Konieczny

322212




322212







  • 6





    Yes, it is mathrmA.

    – JouleV
    Apr 19 at 13:21











  • Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

    – Especially Lime
    Apr 20 at 8:27






  • 3





    How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 10:02






  • 1





    @egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

    – Jakub Konieczny
    Apr 20 at 20:53












  • 6





    Yes, it is mathrmA.

    – JouleV
    Apr 19 at 13:21











  • Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

    – Especially Lime
    Apr 20 at 8:27






  • 3





    How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 10:02






  • 1





    @egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

    – Jakub Konieczny
    Apr 20 at 20:53







6




6





Yes, it is mathrmA.

– JouleV
Apr 19 at 13:21





Yes, it is mathrmA.

– JouleV
Apr 19 at 13:21













Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

– Especially Lime
Apr 20 at 8:27





Slight correction: uppercase Greek letters are by default not italic in math, but lowercase ones are.

– Especially Lime
Apr 20 at 8:27




3




3





How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

– egreg
Apr 20 at 10:02





How will your readers distinguish between Alpha and A?

– egreg
Apr 20 at 10:02




1




1





@egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

– Jakub Konieczny
Apr 20 at 20:53





@egreg - With any luck, Alpha and A will not appear anywhere close to one another. And even if they do, one will be italic and the other one won't.

– Jakub Konieczny
Apr 20 at 20:53










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















31














If you're using LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX, you can use the unicode-math package. It defines all uppercase Greek letters:



documentclassarticle
usepackageunicode-math
begindocument
$Alpha+Beta=Gamma$.
enddocument


The result is:



enter image description here



This way has an advantage in that one can change the style of the letters by altering the unicode-math options. For example usepackage[math-style=ISO]unicode-math without any other changes yields:



enter image description here



Also, this way alpha can be copied&pasted from the resulting PDF.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:37






  • 26





    @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

    – Davislor
    Apr 19 at 18:45







  • 11





    @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

    – alephzero
    Apr 19 at 20:19






  • 6





    +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

    – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
    Apr 19 at 21:25






  • 6





    @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

    – AJFarmar
    Apr 20 at 14:33


















17














Screenshot from lshort.pdf (The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e):



enter image description here



So it is simply mathrmA.



documentclassstandalone
newcommandAlphamathrmA
begindocument
$Alpha+Pi=Gamma$
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:36


















8














I would recommend unicode-math and Sergei Golovan’s solution if you are able to use it. Fewer and fewer publishers force you to use PDFTeX.



Here is a PDFTeX-compatible solution that produces a Greek Α and Β instead of a Latin A and B:



documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackage[LGR, T1]fontenc
usepackage[utf8]inputenc

usepackagelmodern, amsmath

newcommandmupAlphamathordtext%
fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textAlpha
newcommandmupBetamathordtext%
fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textBeta

begindocument
( mupAlpha + mupBeta = Gamma )
enddocument


Latin Modern Font Sample



I chose the names mupAlpha and mupBeta, which are compatible with unicode-math, because they always produce a regular-weight, upright letter. It would also be possible to define italic mitAlpha and bold mbfAlpha by inserting itshape or bfseries. Or you could call it Alpha.



Another alternative is to declare LGR-encoded symbol alphabets and DeclareMathSymbol, but be careful you don’t run out of math alphabets, which are a limited resource in the legacy toolchain. There are a number of packages that define Greek math-mode fonts, including upgreek. Both mathastext and isomath have options to load a LGR font for your Greek letters in math mode.



In theory, you could try the alphabeta package to use commands such as Alpha in either text or math mode, and also insert the Unicode characters in math mode. However, it produces inconsistent results: Α + Β = Γ. In practice, if you want to mix different scripts, you’re much better off with Unicode and the modern toolchain designed for that.






share|improve this answer

























  • Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 9:50












  • @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

    – Davislor
    Apr 20 at 10:11


















5














This works with the default Computer Modern fonts. A different font family should be chosen if the font is different (and it should have support for the LGR encoding).



I redefined also Delta because the correspondence when copying maps the standard Delta to U+2206 INCREMENT.



documentclassarticle
usepackage[LGR,T1]fontenc % or OT1

DeclareSymbolFontupgreekLGRcmrmn
SetSymbolFontupgreekboldLGRcmrbxn

DeclareMathSymbolAlphamathordupgreek`A
DeclareMathSymbolBetamathordupgreek`B
DeclareMathSymbolDeltamathordupgreek`D
DeclareMathSymbolEpsilonmathordupgreek`E
DeclareMathSymbolZetamathordupgreek`Z
DeclareMathSymbolEtamathordupgreek`H
DeclareMathSymbolIotamathordupgreek`I
DeclareMathSymbolKappamathordupgreek`K
DeclareMathSymbolMumathordupgreek`M
DeclareMathSymbolNumathordupgreek`N
DeclareMathSymbolOmicronmathordupgreek`O
DeclareMathSymbolRhomathordupgreek`R
DeclareMathSymbolTaumathordupgreek`T
DeclareMathSymbolChimathordupgreek`Q


begindocument

$AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMu$

$NuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega$

mathversionbold$AlphaBetaGammaDelta$

enddocument


You could also avoid the dependency from LGR, but in this case you have to set up a font family in the U encoding.



enter image description here



Below what I get by copy-paste:



ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜ ΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ ΑΒΓΔ


If you define Alpha as mathrmA you just get the same glyph, but upon copying it would be A.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485593%2fhow-to-write-capital-alpha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    31














    If you're using LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX, you can use the unicode-math package. It defines all uppercase Greek letters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageunicode-math
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Beta=Gamma$.
    enddocument


    The result is:



    enter image description here



    This way has an advantage in that one can change the style of the letters by altering the unicode-math options. For example usepackage[math-style=ISO]unicode-math without any other changes yields:



    enter image description here



    Also, this way alpha can be copied&pasted from the resulting PDF.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:37






    • 26





      @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

      – Davislor
      Apr 19 at 18:45







    • 11





      @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

      – alephzero
      Apr 19 at 20:19






    • 6





      +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

      – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
      Apr 19 at 21:25






    • 6





      @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

      – AJFarmar
      Apr 20 at 14:33















    31














    If you're using LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX, you can use the unicode-math package. It defines all uppercase Greek letters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageunicode-math
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Beta=Gamma$.
    enddocument


    The result is:



    enter image description here



    This way has an advantage in that one can change the style of the letters by altering the unicode-math options. For example usepackage[math-style=ISO]unicode-math without any other changes yields:



    enter image description here



    Also, this way alpha can be copied&pasted from the resulting PDF.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:37






    • 26





      @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

      – Davislor
      Apr 19 at 18:45







    • 11





      @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

      – alephzero
      Apr 19 at 20:19






    • 6





      +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

      – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
      Apr 19 at 21:25






    • 6





      @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

      – AJFarmar
      Apr 20 at 14:33













    31












    31








    31







    If you're using LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX, you can use the unicode-math package. It defines all uppercase Greek letters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageunicode-math
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Beta=Gamma$.
    enddocument


    The result is:



    enter image description here



    This way has an advantage in that one can change the style of the letters by altering the unicode-math options. For example usepackage[math-style=ISO]unicode-math without any other changes yields:



    enter image description here



    Also, this way alpha can be copied&pasted from the resulting PDF.






    share|improve this answer













    If you're using LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX, you can use the unicode-math package. It defines all uppercase Greek letters:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageunicode-math
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Beta=Gamma$.
    enddocument


    The result is:



    enter image description here



    This way has an advantage in that one can change the style of the letters by altering the unicode-math options. For example usepackage[math-style=ISO]unicode-math without any other changes yields:



    enter image description here



    Also, this way alpha can be copied&pasted from the resulting PDF.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 19 at 14:00









    Sergei GolovanSergei Golovan

    4,8331716




    4,8331716







    • 1





      -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:37






    • 26





      @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

      – Davislor
      Apr 19 at 18:45







    • 11





      @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

      – alephzero
      Apr 19 at 20:19






    • 6





      +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

      – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
      Apr 19 at 21:25






    • 6





      @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

      – AJFarmar
      Apr 20 at 14:33












    • 1





      -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:37






    • 26





      @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

      – Davislor
      Apr 19 at 18:45







    • 11





      @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

      – alephzero
      Apr 19 at 20:19






    • 6





      +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

      – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
      Apr 19 at 21:25






    • 6





      @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

      – AJFarmar
      Apr 20 at 14:33







    1




    1





    -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:37





    -1 for dependence on IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:37




    26




    26





    @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

    – Davislor
    Apr 19 at 18:45






    @RosieF There’s no dependence on IDE. Posting a solution that uses newer technology does not merit a downvote unless it fails to answer the question, i.e. ignoring the specified requirements. This site should encourage posting alternative solutions, some of which use LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX.

    – Davislor
    Apr 19 at 18:45





    11




    11





    @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

    – alephzero
    Apr 19 at 20:19





    @RosieF It is impossible to use TeX without using some specific TeX engine. If commonly used implementations behave differently (which may be unfortunate, but is a fact of life) understanding the differences is an important part of the answer.

    – alephzero
    Apr 19 at 20:19




    6




    6





    +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

    – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
    Apr 19 at 21:25





    +1: @RosieF I also no not see any reason for a downvote at all.

    – Dr. Manuel Kuehner
    Apr 19 at 21:25




    6




    6





    @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

    – AJFarmar
    Apr 20 at 14:33





    @RosieF By the same logic, all questions that depend on LaTeX instead of just base TeX should be downvoted, since that is an extremely large dependence!

    – AJFarmar
    Apr 20 at 14:33











    17














    Screenshot from lshort.pdf (The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e):



    enter image description here



    So it is simply mathrmA.



    documentclassstandalone
    newcommandAlphamathrmA
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Pi=Gamma$
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:36















    17














    Screenshot from lshort.pdf (The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e):



    enter image description here



    So it is simply mathrmA.



    documentclassstandalone
    newcommandAlphamathrmA
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Pi=Gamma$
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:36













    17












    17








    17







    Screenshot from lshort.pdf (The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e):



    enter image description here



    So it is simply mathrmA.



    documentclassstandalone
    newcommandAlphamathrmA
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Pi=Gamma$
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer













    Screenshot from lshort.pdf (The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e):



    enter image description here



    So it is simply mathrmA.



    documentclassstandalone
    newcommandAlphamathrmA
    begindocument
    $Alpha+Pi=Gamma$
    enddocument


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 19 at 13:26









    JouleVJouleV

    16.1k22667




    16.1k22667







    • 3





      +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:36












    • 3





      +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 19 at 17:36







    3




    3





    +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:36





    +1 for independence from IDE/engine.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 19 at 17:36











    8














    I would recommend unicode-math and Sergei Golovan’s solution if you are able to use it. Fewer and fewer publishers force you to use PDFTeX.



    Here is a PDFTeX-compatible solution that produces a Greek Α and Β instead of a Latin A and B:



    documentclass[varwidth]standalone
    usepackage[LGR, T1]fontenc
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc

    usepackagelmodern, amsmath

    newcommandmupAlphamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textAlpha
    newcommandmupBetamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textBeta

    begindocument
    ( mupAlpha + mupBeta = Gamma )
    enddocument


    Latin Modern Font Sample



    I chose the names mupAlpha and mupBeta, which are compatible with unicode-math, because they always produce a regular-weight, upright letter. It would also be possible to define italic mitAlpha and bold mbfAlpha by inserting itshape or bfseries. Or you could call it Alpha.



    Another alternative is to declare LGR-encoded symbol alphabets and DeclareMathSymbol, but be careful you don’t run out of math alphabets, which are a limited resource in the legacy toolchain. There are a number of packages that define Greek math-mode fonts, including upgreek. Both mathastext and isomath have options to load a LGR font for your Greek letters in math mode.



    In theory, you could try the alphabeta package to use commands such as Alpha in either text or math mode, and also insert the Unicode characters in math mode. However, it produces inconsistent results: Α + Β = Γ. In practice, if you want to mix different scripts, you’re much better off with Unicode and the modern toolchain designed for that.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

      – egreg
      Apr 20 at 9:50












    • @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

      – Davislor
      Apr 20 at 10:11















    8














    I would recommend unicode-math and Sergei Golovan’s solution if you are able to use it. Fewer and fewer publishers force you to use PDFTeX.



    Here is a PDFTeX-compatible solution that produces a Greek Α and Β instead of a Latin A and B:



    documentclass[varwidth]standalone
    usepackage[LGR, T1]fontenc
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc

    usepackagelmodern, amsmath

    newcommandmupAlphamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textAlpha
    newcommandmupBetamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textBeta

    begindocument
    ( mupAlpha + mupBeta = Gamma )
    enddocument


    Latin Modern Font Sample



    I chose the names mupAlpha and mupBeta, which are compatible with unicode-math, because they always produce a regular-weight, upright letter. It would also be possible to define italic mitAlpha and bold mbfAlpha by inserting itshape or bfseries. Or you could call it Alpha.



    Another alternative is to declare LGR-encoded symbol alphabets and DeclareMathSymbol, but be careful you don’t run out of math alphabets, which are a limited resource in the legacy toolchain. There are a number of packages that define Greek math-mode fonts, including upgreek. Both mathastext and isomath have options to load a LGR font for your Greek letters in math mode.



    In theory, you could try the alphabeta package to use commands such as Alpha in either text or math mode, and also insert the Unicode characters in math mode. However, it produces inconsistent results: Α + Β = Γ. In practice, if you want to mix different scripts, you’re much better off with Unicode and the modern toolchain designed for that.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

      – egreg
      Apr 20 at 9:50












    • @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

      – Davislor
      Apr 20 at 10:11













    8












    8








    8







    I would recommend unicode-math and Sergei Golovan’s solution if you are able to use it. Fewer and fewer publishers force you to use PDFTeX.



    Here is a PDFTeX-compatible solution that produces a Greek Α and Β instead of a Latin A and B:



    documentclass[varwidth]standalone
    usepackage[LGR, T1]fontenc
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc

    usepackagelmodern, amsmath

    newcommandmupAlphamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textAlpha
    newcommandmupBetamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textBeta

    begindocument
    ( mupAlpha + mupBeta = Gamma )
    enddocument


    Latin Modern Font Sample



    I chose the names mupAlpha and mupBeta, which are compatible with unicode-math, because they always produce a regular-weight, upright letter. It would also be possible to define italic mitAlpha and bold mbfAlpha by inserting itshape or bfseries. Or you could call it Alpha.



    Another alternative is to declare LGR-encoded symbol alphabets and DeclareMathSymbol, but be careful you don’t run out of math alphabets, which are a limited resource in the legacy toolchain. There are a number of packages that define Greek math-mode fonts, including upgreek. Both mathastext and isomath have options to load a LGR font for your Greek letters in math mode.



    In theory, you could try the alphabeta package to use commands such as Alpha in either text or math mode, and also insert the Unicode characters in math mode. However, it produces inconsistent results: Α + Β = Γ. In practice, if you want to mix different scripts, you’re much better off with Unicode and the modern toolchain designed for that.






    share|improve this answer















    I would recommend unicode-math and Sergei Golovan’s solution if you are able to use it. Fewer and fewer publishers force you to use PDFTeX.



    Here is a PDFTeX-compatible solution that produces a Greek Α and Β instead of a Latin A and B:



    documentclass[varwidth]standalone
    usepackage[LGR, T1]fontenc
    usepackage[utf8]inputenc

    usepackagelmodern, amsmath

    newcommandmupAlphamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textAlpha
    newcommandmupBetamathordtext%
    fontencodingLGRupshapeselectfont textBeta

    begindocument
    ( mupAlpha + mupBeta = Gamma )
    enddocument


    Latin Modern Font Sample



    I chose the names mupAlpha and mupBeta, which are compatible with unicode-math, because they always produce a regular-weight, upright letter. It would also be possible to define italic mitAlpha and bold mbfAlpha by inserting itshape or bfseries. Or you could call it Alpha.



    Another alternative is to declare LGR-encoded symbol alphabets and DeclareMathSymbol, but be careful you don’t run out of math alphabets, which are a limited resource in the legacy toolchain. There are a number of packages that define Greek math-mode fonts, including upgreek. Both mathastext and isomath have options to load a LGR font for your Greek letters in math mode.



    In theory, you could try the alphabeta package to use commands such as Alpha in either text or math mode, and also insert the Unicode characters in math mode. However, it produces inconsistent results: Α + Β = Γ. In practice, if you want to mix different scripts, you’re much better off with Unicode and the modern toolchain designed for that.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 20 at 10:10

























    answered Apr 19 at 19:52









    DavislorDavislor

    7,6691433




    7,6691433












    • Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

      – egreg
      Apr 20 at 9:50












    • @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

      – Davislor
      Apr 20 at 10:11

















    • Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

      – egreg
      Apr 20 at 9:50












    • @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

      – Davislor
      Apr 20 at 10:11
















    Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 9:50






    Did you try $x_mupAlpha$?

    – egreg
    Apr 20 at 9:50














    @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

    – Davislor
    Apr 20 at 10:11





    @egreg Oof! Thanks for the reminder.

    – Davislor
    Apr 20 at 10:11











    5














    This works with the default Computer Modern fonts. A different font family should be chosen if the font is different (and it should have support for the LGR encoding).



    I redefined also Delta because the correspondence when copying maps the standard Delta to U+2206 INCREMENT.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[LGR,T1]fontenc % or OT1

    DeclareSymbolFontupgreekLGRcmrmn
    SetSymbolFontupgreekboldLGRcmrbxn

    DeclareMathSymbolAlphamathordupgreek`A
    DeclareMathSymbolBetamathordupgreek`B
    DeclareMathSymbolDeltamathordupgreek`D
    DeclareMathSymbolEpsilonmathordupgreek`E
    DeclareMathSymbolZetamathordupgreek`Z
    DeclareMathSymbolEtamathordupgreek`H
    DeclareMathSymbolIotamathordupgreek`I
    DeclareMathSymbolKappamathordupgreek`K
    DeclareMathSymbolMumathordupgreek`M
    DeclareMathSymbolNumathordupgreek`N
    DeclareMathSymbolOmicronmathordupgreek`O
    DeclareMathSymbolRhomathordupgreek`R
    DeclareMathSymbolTaumathordupgreek`T
    DeclareMathSymbolChimathordupgreek`Q


    begindocument

    $AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMu$

    $NuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega$

    mathversionbold$AlphaBetaGammaDelta$

    enddocument


    You could also avoid the dependency from LGR, but in this case you have to set up a font family in the U encoding.



    enter image description here



    Below what I get by copy-paste:



    ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜ ΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ ΑΒΓΔ


    If you define Alpha as mathrmA you just get the same glyph, but upon copying it would be A.






    share|improve this answer



























      5














      This works with the default Computer Modern fonts. A different font family should be chosen if the font is different (and it should have support for the LGR encoding).



      I redefined also Delta because the correspondence when copying maps the standard Delta to U+2206 INCREMENT.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackage[LGR,T1]fontenc % or OT1

      DeclareSymbolFontupgreekLGRcmrmn
      SetSymbolFontupgreekboldLGRcmrbxn

      DeclareMathSymbolAlphamathordupgreek`A
      DeclareMathSymbolBetamathordupgreek`B
      DeclareMathSymbolDeltamathordupgreek`D
      DeclareMathSymbolEpsilonmathordupgreek`E
      DeclareMathSymbolZetamathordupgreek`Z
      DeclareMathSymbolEtamathordupgreek`H
      DeclareMathSymbolIotamathordupgreek`I
      DeclareMathSymbolKappamathordupgreek`K
      DeclareMathSymbolMumathordupgreek`M
      DeclareMathSymbolNumathordupgreek`N
      DeclareMathSymbolOmicronmathordupgreek`O
      DeclareMathSymbolRhomathordupgreek`R
      DeclareMathSymbolTaumathordupgreek`T
      DeclareMathSymbolChimathordupgreek`Q


      begindocument

      $AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMu$

      $NuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega$

      mathversionbold$AlphaBetaGammaDelta$

      enddocument


      You could also avoid the dependency from LGR, but in this case you have to set up a font family in the U encoding.



      enter image description here



      Below what I get by copy-paste:



      ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜ ΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ ΑΒΓΔ


      If you define Alpha as mathrmA you just get the same glyph, but upon copying it would be A.






      share|improve this answer

























        5












        5








        5







        This works with the default Computer Modern fonts. A different font family should be chosen if the font is different (and it should have support for the LGR encoding).



        I redefined also Delta because the correspondence when copying maps the standard Delta to U+2206 INCREMENT.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackage[LGR,T1]fontenc % or OT1

        DeclareSymbolFontupgreekLGRcmrmn
        SetSymbolFontupgreekboldLGRcmrbxn

        DeclareMathSymbolAlphamathordupgreek`A
        DeclareMathSymbolBetamathordupgreek`B
        DeclareMathSymbolDeltamathordupgreek`D
        DeclareMathSymbolEpsilonmathordupgreek`E
        DeclareMathSymbolZetamathordupgreek`Z
        DeclareMathSymbolEtamathordupgreek`H
        DeclareMathSymbolIotamathordupgreek`I
        DeclareMathSymbolKappamathordupgreek`K
        DeclareMathSymbolMumathordupgreek`M
        DeclareMathSymbolNumathordupgreek`N
        DeclareMathSymbolOmicronmathordupgreek`O
        DeclareMathSymbolRhomathordupgreek`R
        DeclareMathSymbolTaumathordupgreek`T
        DeclareMathSymbolChimathordupgreek`Q


        begindocument

        $AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMu$

        $NuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega$

        mathversionbold$AlphaBetaGammaDelta$

        enddocument


        You could also avoid the dependency from LGR, but in this case you have to set up a font family in the U encoding.



        enter image description here



        Below what I get by copy-paste:



        ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜ ΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ ΑΒΓΔ


        If you define Alpha as mathrmA you just get the same glyph, but upon copying it would be A.






        share|improve this answer













        This works with the default Computer Modern fonts. A different font family should be chosen if the font is different (and it should have support for the LGR encoding).



        I redefined also Delta because the correspondence when copying maps the standard Delta to U+2206 INCREMENT.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackage[LGR,T1]fontenc % or OT1

        DeclareSymbolFontupgreekLGRcmrmn
        SetSymbolFontupgreekboldLGRcmrbxn

        DeclareMathSymbolAlphamathordupgreek`A
        DeclareMathSymbolBetamathordupgreek`B
        DeclareMathSymbolDeltamathordupgreek`D
        DeclareMathSymbolEpsilonmathordupgreek`E
        DeclareMathSymbolZetamathordupgreek`Z
        DeclareMathSymbolEtamathordupgreek`H
        DeclareMathSymbolIotamathordupgreek`I
        DeclareMathSymbolKappamathordupgreek`K
        DeclareMathSymbolMumathordupgreek`M
        DeclareMathSymbolNumathordupgreek`N
        DeclareMathSymbolOmicronmathordupgreek`O
        DeclareMathSymbolRhomathordupgreek`R
        DeclareMathSymbolTaumathordupgreek`T
        DeclareMathSymbolChimathordupgreek`Q


        begindocument

        $AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMu$

        $NuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega$

        mathversionbold$AlphaBetaGammaDelta$

        enddocument


        You could also avoid the dependency from LGR, but in this case you have to set up a font family in the U encoding.



        enter image description here



        Below what I get by copy-paste:



        ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜ ΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ ΑΒΓΔ


        If you define Alpha as mathrmA you just get the same glyph, but upon copying it would be A.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 20 at 21:56









        egregegreg

        737k8919373265




        737k8919373265



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485593%2fhow-to-write-capital-alpha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

            Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

            What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company