LACP 802.3ad load balancing (bonding) on Ubuntu 18.04 not balancing evenly Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Configure static IPv6 on UbuntuLinux bonding: 802.3ad (LACP) vs. balance-alb modetunneling layer 2 sshNIC Bonding works but can't pingLACP vs 802.3adIPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2: link is not ready & IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): xenbr2: link is not ready on Ubuntu Server - Xen bridgeLink aggregation (LACP/802.3ad) max throughputStatic Public IP Address on Amazon EC2LACP - Load Balancing Network 2Gbit UbuntuWin2012R2 NIC Teaming with LACP, but one nic has not traffic

Was Kant an Intuitionist about mathematical objects?

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

After Sam didn't return home in the end, were he and Al still friends?

What is the difference between a "ranged attack" and a "ranged weapon attack"?

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

Project Euler #1 in C++

Why is std::move not [[nodiscard]] in C++20?

What is the origin of 落第?

The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?

Can an iPhone 7 be made to function as a NFC Tag?

Relating to the President and obstruction, were Mueller's conclusions preordained?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

Resize vertical bars (absolute-value symbols)

Why datecode is SO IMPORTANT to chip manufacturers?

How can a team of shapeshifters communicate?

Flight departed from the gate 5 min before scheduled departure time. Refund options

How to change the tick of the color bar legend to black

Does the Black Tentacles spell do damage twice at the start of turn to an already restrained creature?

Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines

NERDTreeMenu Remapping

A proverb that is used to imply that you have unexpectedly faced a big problem

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?

Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?

Rationale for describing kurtosis as "peakedness"?



LACP 802.3ad load balancing (bonding) on Ubuntu 18.04 not balancing evenly



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Configure static IPv6 on UbuntuLinux bonding: 802.3ad (LACP) vs. balance-alb modetunneling layer 2 sshNIC Bonding works but can't pingLACP vs 802.3adIPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2: link is not ready & IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): xenbr2: link is not ready on Ubuntu Server - Xen bridgeLink aggregation (LACP/802.3ad) max throughputStatic Public IP Address on Amazon EC2LACP - Load Balancing Network 2Gbit UbuntuWin2012R2 NIC Teaming with LACP, but one nic has not traffic



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















I upgraded to Ubuntu 18.04 and the new Netplan configuration, but my (2) network cards stopped sharing the load evenly. In my network configuration, I have many connections to many different servers; this configuration worked with previous versions of Ubuntu.



My configuration is below:



network:
ethernets:
enp0s31f6:
dhcp4: false
enp1s0:
dhcp4: false
version: 2
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [enp0s31f6,enp1s0]
addresses: [10.0.10.10/16]
gateway4: 10.0.0.1
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
addresses: [10.0.0.1]
search: [mydomain.example.com]
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100


However, ifconfig shows uneven distribution of the network load:



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
inet 10.0.10.10 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.0.255.255
inet6 fe80::4876:c7ff:fecc:8a73 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7379403761 bytes 11148965732346 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 168862 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 504974341 bytes 37356421339 (37.3 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 6 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

enp0s31f6: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 1251616 bytes 107128982 (107.1 MB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 83864 overruns 0 frame 0
**TX packets 1120861 bytes 238470225 (238.4 MB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 16 memory 0x92f00000-92f20000

enp1s0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7378152145 bytes 11148858603364 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 503853480 bytes 37117951114 (37.1 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device memory 0x92e00000-92e1ffff


Any idea what is wrong with this configuration? Thank you for your help.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    What xmit_hash_policy did you set? According to the kernel documentation layer2 is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this to layer3+4 and test again.

    – Thomas
    May 21 '18 at 15:27






  • 1





    What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?

    – Mikhail Khirgiy
    May 21 '18 at 16:17

















1















I upgraded to Ubuntu 18.04 and the new Netplan configuration, but my (2) network cards stopped sharing the load evenly. In my network configuration, I have many connections to many different servers; this configuration worked with previous versions of Ubuntu.



My configuration is below:



network:
ethernets:
enp0s31f6:
dhcp4: false
enp1s0:
dhcp4: false
version: 2
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [enp0s31f6,enp1s0]
addresses: [10.0.10.10/16]
gateway4: 10.0.0.1
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
addresses: [10.0.0.1]
search: [mydomain.example.com]
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100


However, ifconfig shows uneven distribution of the network load:



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
inet 10.0.10.10 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.0.255.255
inet6 fe80::4876:c7ff:fecc:8a73 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7379403761 bytes 11148965732346 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 168862 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 504974341 bytes 37356421339 (37.3 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 6 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

enp0s31f6: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 1251616 bytes 107128982 (107.1 MB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 83864 overruns 0 frame 0
**TX packets 1120861 bytes 238470225 (238.4 MB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 16 memory 0x92f00000-92f20000

enp1s0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7378152145 bytes 11148858603364 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 503853480 bytes 37117951114 (37.1 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device memory 0x92e00000-92e1ffff


Any idea what is wrong with this configuration? Thank you for your help.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    What xmit_hash_policy did you set? According to the kernel documentation layer2 is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this to layer3+4 and test again.

    – Thomas
    May 21 '18 at 15:27






  • 1





    What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?

    – Mikhail Khirgiy
    May 21 '18 at 16:17













1












1








1


1






I upgraded to Ubuntu 18.04 and the new Netplan configuration, but my (2) network cards stopped sharing the load evenly. In my network configuration, I have many connections to many different servers; this configuration worked with previous versions of Ubuntu.



My configuration is below:



network:
ethernets:
enp0s31f6:
dhcp4: false
enp1s0:
dhcp4: false
version: 2
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [enp0s31f6,enp1s0]
addresses: [10.0.10.10/16]
gateway4: 10.0.0.1
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
addresses: [10.0.0.1]
search: [mydomain.example.com]
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100


However, ifconfig shows uneven distribution of the network load:



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
inet 10.0.10.10 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.0.255.255
inet6 fe80::4876:c7ff:fecc:8a73 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7379403761 bytes 11148965732346 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 168862 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 504974341 bytes 37356421339 (37.3 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 6 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

enp0s31f6: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 1251616 bytes 107128982 (107.1 MB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 83864 overruns 0 frame 0
**TX packets 1120861 bytes 238470225 (238.4 MB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 16 memory 0x92f00000-92f20000

enp1s0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7378152145 bytes 11148858603364 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 503853480 bytes 37117951114 (37.1 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device memory 0x92e00000-92e1ffff


Any idea what is wrong with this configuration? Thank you for your help.










share|improve this question














I upgraded to Ubuntu 18.04 and the new Netplan configuration, but my (2) network cards stopped sharing the load evenly. In my network configuration, I have many connections to many different servers; this configuration worked with previous versions of Ubuntu.



My configuration is below:



network:
ethernets:
enp0s31f6:
dhcp4: false
enp1s0:
dhcp4: false
version: 2
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [enp0s31f6,enp1s0]
addresses: [10.0.10.10/16]
gateway4: 10.0.0.1
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
addresses: [10.0.0.1]
search: [mydomain.example.com]
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100


However, ifconfig shows uneven distribution of the network load:



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
inet 10.0.10.10 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.0.255.255
inet6 fe80::4876:c7ff:fecc:8a73 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7379403761 bytes 11148965732346 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 168862 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 504974341 bytes 37356421339 (37.3 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 6 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

enp0s31f6: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 1251616 bytes 107128982 (107.1 MB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 83864 overruns 0 frame 0
**TX packets 1120861 bytes 238470225 (238.4 MB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 16 memory 0x92f00000-92f20000

enp1s0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7378152145 bytes 11148858603364 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 503853480 bytes 37117951114 (37.1 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device memory 0x92e00000-92e1ffff


Any idea what is wrong with this configuration? Thank you for your help.







ubuntu bonding lacp ubuntu-18.04






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 21 '18 at 15:12









ensnareensnare

93751733




93751733







  • 1





    What xmit_hash_policy did you set? According to the kernel documentation layer2 is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this to layer3+4 and test again.

    – Thomas
    May 21 '18 at 15:27






  • 1





    What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?

    – Mikhail Khirgiy
    May 21 '18 at 16:17












  • 1





    What xmit_hash_policy did you set? According to the kernel documentation layer2 is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this to layer3+4 and test again.

    – Thomas
    May 21 '18 at 15:27






  • 1





    What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?

    – Mikhail Khirgiy
    May 21 '18 at 16:17







1




1





What xmit_hash_policy did you set? According to the kernel documentation layer2 is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this to layer3+4 and test again.

– Thomas
May 21 '18 at 15:27





What xmit_hash_policy did you set? According to the kernel documentation layer2 is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this to layer3+4 and test again.

– Thomas
May 21 '18 at 15:27




1




1





What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?

– Mikhail Khirgiy
May 21 '18 at 16:17





What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?

– Mikhail Khirgiy
May 21 '18 at 16:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














The following configuration work fine for me. Running Ubuntu 18.04 ppc64el. And BTW, if you want to use the REAL interface name instead of something like enp0s31f6, just do the following.



vi /etc/default/grub and add this:



GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0"


Then rebuilt the boot loader



grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.vfg


Reboot the system and You'll get the real nic name like eth0, eth1...
When it's done, edit this file and make sure it fit with your IP's !!!



vi /etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml

# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# For more information, see netplan(5).
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
eth0:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
eth1:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [eth0, eth1]
addresses: [192.168.0.10/24]
gateway4: 192.168.0.1
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
search: [home.lan],
addresses: [192.168.0.250]


Then, type netplan try to validate your configuration. If successful, run netplan apply and reboot.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "2"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f913106%2flacp-802-3ad-load-balancing-bonding-on-ubuntu-18-04-not-balancing-evenly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    The following configuration work fine for me. Running Ubuntu 18.04 ppc64el. And BTW, if you want to use the REAL interface name instead of something like enp0s31f6, just do the following.



    vi /etc/default/grub and add this:



    GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0"


    Then rebuilt the boot loader



    grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.vfg


    Reboot the system and You'll get the real nic name like eth0, eth1...
    When it's done, edit this file and make sure it fit with your IP's !!!



    vi /etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml

    # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
    # For more information, see netplan(5).
    network:
    version: 2
    renderer: networkd
    ethernets:
    eth0:
    match:
    macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
    wakeonlan: true
    eth1:
    match:
    macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
    wakeonlan: true
    bonds:
    bond0:
    interfaces: [eth0, eth1]
    addresses: [192.168.0.10/24]
    gateway4: 192.168.0.1
    parameters:
    mode: 802.3ad
    lacp-rate: fast
    mii-monitor-interval: 100
    mtu: 9000
    nameservers:
    search: [home.lan],
    addresses: [192.168.0.250]


    Then, type netplan try to validate your configuration. If successful, run netplan apply and reboot.






    share|improve this answer





























      0














      The following configuration work fine for me. Running Ubuntu 18.04 ppc64el. And BTW, if you want to use the REAL interface name instead of something like enp0s31f6, just do the following.



      vi /etc/default/grub and add this:



      GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0"


      Then rebuilt the boot loader



      grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.vfg


      Reboot the system and You'll get the real nic name like eth0, eth1...
      When it's done, edit this file and make sure it fit with your IP's !!!



      vi /etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml

      # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
      # For more information, see netplan(5).
      network:
      version: 2
      renderer: networkd
      ethernets:
      eth0:
      match:
      macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
      wakeonlan: true
      eth1:
      match:
      macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
      wakeonlan: true
      bonds:
      bond0:
      interfaces: [eth0, eth1]
      addresses: [192.168.0.10/24]
      gateway4: 192.168.0.1
      parameters:
      mode: 802.3ad
      lacp-rate: fast
      mii-monitor-interval: 100
      mtu: 9000
      nameservers:
      search: [home.lan],
      addresses: [192.168.0.250]


      Then, type netplan try to validate your configuration. If successful, run netplan apply and reboot.






      share|improve this answer



























        0












        0








        0







        The following configuration work fine for me. Running Ubuntu 18.04 ppc64el. And BTW, if you want to use the REAL interface name instead of something like enp0s31f6, just do the following.



        vi /etc/default/grub and add this:



        GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0"


        Then rebuilt the boot loader



        grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.vfg


        Reboot the system and You'll get the real nic name like eth0, eth1...
        When it's done, edit this file and make sure it fit with your IP's !!!



        vi /etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml

        # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
        # For more information, see netplan(5).
        network:
        version: 2
        renderer: networkd
        ethernets:
        eth0:
        match:
        macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
        wakeonlan: true
        eth1:
        match:
        macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
        wakeonlan: true
        bonds:
        bond0:
        interfaces: [eth0, eth1]
        addresses: [192.168.0.10/24]
        gateway4: 192.168.0.1
        parameters:
        mode: 802.3ad
        lacp-rate: fast
        mii-monitor-interval: 100
        mtu: 9000
        nameservers:
        search: [home.lan],
        addresses: [192.168.0.250]


        Then, type netplan try to validate your configuration. If successful, run netplan apply and reboot.






        share|improve this answer















        The following configuration work fine for me. Running Ubuntu 18.04 ppc64el. And BTW, if you want to use the REAL interface name instead of something like enp0s31f6, just do the following.



        vi /etc/default/grub and add this:



        GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0"


        Then rebuilt the boot loader



        grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.vfg


        Reboot the system and You'll get the real nic name like eth0, eth1...
        When it's done, edit this file and make sure it fit with your IP's !!!



        vi /etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml

        # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
        # For more information, see netplan(5).
        network:
        version: 2
        renderer: networkd
        ethernets:
        eth0:
        match:
        macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
        wakeonlan: true
        eth1:
        match:
        macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
        wakeonlan: true
        bonds:
        bond0:
        interfaces: [eth0, eth1]
        addresses: [192.168.0.10/24]
        gateway4: 192.168.0.1
        parameters:
        mode: 802.3ad
        lacp-rate: fast
        mii-monitor-interval: 100
        mtu: 9000
        nameservers:
        search: [home.lan],
        addresses: [192.168.0.250]


        Then, type netplan try to validate your configuration. If successful, run netplan apply and reboot.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 13 '18 at 23:17









        Sean Bright

        24515




        24515










        answered Aug 31 '18 at 19:11









        GuyPGuyP

        1




        1



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f913106%2flacp-802-3ad-load-balancing-bonding-on-ubuntu-18-04-not-balancing-evenly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

            Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

            What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company