LACP 802.3ad load balancing (bonding) on Ubuntu 18.04 not balancing evenly Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Configure static IPv6 on UbuntuLinux bonding: 802.3ad (LACP) vs. balance-alb modetunneling layer 2 sshNIC Bonding works but can't pingLACP vs 802.3adIPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2: link is not ready & IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): xenbr2: link is not ready on Ubuntu Server - Xen bridgeLink aggregation (LACP/802.3ad) max throughputStatic Public IP Address on Amazon EC2LACP - Load Balancing Network 2Gbit UbuntuWin2012R2 NIC Teaming with LACP, but one nic has not traffic
Was Kant an Intuitionist about mathematical objects?
What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?
After Sam didn't return home in the end, were he and Al still friends?
What is the difference between a "ranged attack" and a "ranged weapon attack"?
Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?
Project Euler #1 in C++
Why is std::move not [[nodiscard]] in C++20?
What is the origin of 落第?
The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?
Can an iPhone 7 be made to function as a NFC Tag?
Relating to the President and obstruction, were Mueller's conclusions preordained?
How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?
Resize vertical bars (absolute-value symbols)
Why datecode is SO IMPORTANT to chip manufacturers?
How can a team of shapeshifters communicate?
Flight departed from the gate 5 min before scheduled departure time. Refund options
How to change the tick of the color bar legend to black
Does the Black Tentacles spell do damage twice at the start of turn to an already restrained creature?
Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines
NERDTreeMenu Remapping
A proverb that is used to imply that you have unexpectedly faced a big problem
How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?
Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?
Rationale for describing kurtosis as "peakedness"?
LACP 802.3ad load balancing (bonding) on Ubuntu 18.04 not balancing evenly
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Configure static IPv6 on UbuntuLinux bonding: 802.3ad (LACP) vs. balance-alb modetunneling layer 2 sshNIC Bonding works but can't pingLACP vs 802.3adIPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2: link is not ready & IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): xenbr2: link is not ready on Ubuntu Server - Xen bridgeLink aggregation (LACP/802.3ad) max throughputStatic Public IP Address on Amazon EC2LACP - Load Balancing Network 2Gbit UbuntuWin2012R2 NIC Teaming with LACP, but one nic has not traffic
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I upgraded to Ubuntu 18.04 and the new Netplan configuration, but my (2) network cards stopped sharing the load evenly. In my network configuration, I have many connections to many different servers; this configuration worked with previous versions of Ubuntu.
My configuration is below:
network:
ethernets:
enp0s31f6:
dhcp4: false
enp1s0:
dhcp4: false
version: 2
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [enp0s31f6,enp1s0]
addresses: [10.0.10.10/16]
gateway4: 10.0.0.1
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
addresses: [10.0.0.1]
search: [mydomain.example.com]
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100
However, ifconfig shows uneven distribution of the network load:
bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
inet 10.0.10.10 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.0.255.255
inet6 fe80::4876:c7ff:fecc:8a73 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7379403761 bytes 11148965732346 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 168862 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 504974341 bytes 37356421339 (37.3 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 6 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp0s31f6: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 1251616 bytes 107128982 (107.1 MB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 83864 overruns 0 frame 0
**TX packets 1120861 bytes 238470225 (238.4 MB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 16 memory 0x92f00000-92f20000
enp1s0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7378152145 bytes 11148858603364 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 503853480 bytes 37117951114 (37.1 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device memory 0x92e00000-92e1ffff
Any idea what is wrong with this configuration? Thank you for your help.
ubuntu bonding lacp ubuntu-18.04
add a comment |
I upgraded to Ubuntu 18.04 and the new Netplan configuration, but my (2) network cards stopped sharing the load evenly. In my network configuration, I have many connections to many different servers; this configuration worked with previous versions of Ubuntu.
My configuration is below:
network:
ethernets:
enp0s31f6:
dhcp4: false
enp1s0:
dhcp4: false
version: 2
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [enp0s31f6,enp1s0]
addresses: [10.0.10.10/16]
gateway4: 10.0.0.1
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
addresses: [10.0.0.1]
search: [mydomain.example.com]
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100
However, ifconfig shows uneven distribution of the network load:
bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
inet 10.0.10.10 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.0.255.255
inet6 fe80::4876:c7ff:fecc:8a73 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7379403761 bytes 11148965732346 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 168862 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 504974341 bytes 37356421339 (37.3 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 6 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp0s31f6: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 1251616 bytes 107128982 (107.1 MB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 83864 overruns 0 frame 0
**TX packets 1120861 bytes 238470225 (238.4 MB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 16 memory 0x92f00000-92f20000
enp1s0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7378152145 bytes 11148858603364 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 503853480 bytes 37117951114 (37.1 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device memory 0x92e00000-92e1ffff
Any idea what is wrong with this configuration? Thank you for your help.
ubuntu bonding lacp ubuntu-18.04
1
Whatxmit_hash_policy
did you set? According to the kernel documentationlayer2
is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this tolayer3+4
and test again.
– Thomas
May 21 '18 at 15:27
1
What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?
– Mikhail Khirgiy
May 21 '18 at 16:17
add a comment |
I upgraded to Ubuntu 18.04 and the new Netplan configuration, but my (2) network cards stopped sharing the load evenly. In my network configuration, I have many connections to many different servers; this configuration worked with previous versions of Ubuntu.
My configuration is below:
network:
ethernets:
enp0s31f6:
dhcp4: false
enp1s0:
dhcp4: false
version: 2
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [enp0s31f6,enp1s0]
addresses: [10.0.10.10/16]
gateway4: 10.0.0.1
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
addresses: [10.0.0.1]
search: [mydomain.example.com]
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100
However, ifconfig shows uneven distribution of the network load:
bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
inet 10.0.10.10 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.0.255.255
inet6 fe80::4876:c7ff:fecc:8a73 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7379403761 bytes 11148965732346 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 168862 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 504974341 bytes 37356421339 (37.3 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 6 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp0s31f6: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 1251616 bytes 107128982 (107.1 MB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 83864 overruns 0 frame 0
**TX packets 1120861 bytes 238470225 (238.4 MB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 16 memory 0x92f00000-92f20000
enp1s0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7378152145 bytes 11148858603364 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 503853480 bytes 37117951114 (37.1 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device memory 0x92e00000-92e1ffff
Any idea what is wrong with this configuration? Thank you for your help.
ubuntu bonding lacp ubuntu-18.04
I upgraded to Ubuntu 18.04 and the new Netplan configuration, but my (2) network cards stopped sharing the load evenly. In my network configuration, I have many connections to many different servers; this configuration worked with previous versions of Ubuntu.
My configuration is below:
network:
ethernets:
enp0s31f6:
dhcp4: false
enp1s0:
dhcp4: false
version: 2
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [enp0s31f6,enp1s0]
addresses: [10.0.10.10/16]
gateway4: 10.0.0.1
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
addresses: [10.0.0.1]
search: [mydomain.example.com]
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100
However, ifconfig shows uneven distribution of the network load:
bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
inet 10.0.10.10 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.0.255.255
inet6 fe80::4876:c7ff:fecc:8a73 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7379403761 bytes 11148965732346 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 168862 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 504974341 bytes 37356421339 (37.3 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 6 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp0s31f6: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 1251616 bytes 107128982 (107.1 MB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 83864 overruns 0 frame 0
**TX packets 1120861 bytes 238470225 (238.4 MB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 16 memory 0x92f00000-92f20000
enp1s0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
ether 4a:76:c7:cc:8a:73 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
**RX packets 7378152145 bytes 11148858603364 (11.1 TB)**
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 8554 frame 0
**TX packets 503853480 bytes 37117951114 (37.1 GB)**
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device memory 0x92e00000-92e1ffff
Any idea what is wrong with this configuration? Thank you for your help.
ubuntu bonding lacp ubuntu-18.04
ubuntu bonding lacp ubuntu-18.04
asked May 21 '18 at 15:12
ensnareensnare
93751733
93751733
1
Whatxmit_hash_policy
did you set? According to the kernel documentationlayer2
is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this tolayer3+4
and test again.
– Thomas
May 21 '18 at 15:27
1
What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?
– Mikhail Khirgiy
May 21 '18 at 16:17
add a comment |
1
Whatxmit_hash_policy
did you set? According to the kernel documentationlayer2
is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this tolayer3+4
and test again.
– Thomas
May 21 '18 at 15:27
1
What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?
– Mikhail Khirgiy
May 21 '18 at 16:17
1
1
What
xmit_hash_policy
did you set? According to the kernel documentation layer2
is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this to layer3+4
and test again.– Thomas
May 21 '18 at 15:27
What
xmit_hash_policy
did you set? According to the kernel documentation layer2
is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this to layer3+4
and test again.– Thomas
May 21 '18 at 15:27
1
1
What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?
– Mikhail Khirgiy
May 21 '18 at 16:17
What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?
– Mikhail Khirgiy
May 21 '18 at 16:17
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The following configuration work fine for me. Running Ubuntu 18.04 ppc64el. And BTW, if you want to use the REAL interface name instead of something like enp0s31f6, just do the following.
vi /etc/default/grub
and add this:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0"
Then rebuilt the boot loader
grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.vfg
Reboot the system and You'll get the real nic name like eth0, eth1...
When it's done, edit this file and make sure it fit with your IP's !!!
vi /etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# For more information, see netplan(5).
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
eth0:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
eth1:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [eth0, eth1]
addresses: [192.168.0.10/24]
gateway4: 192.168.0.1
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
search: [home.lan],
addresses: [192.168.0.250]
Then, type netplan try
to validate your configuration. If successful, run netplan apply
and reboot.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f913106%2flacp-802-3ad-load-balancing-bonding-on-ubuntu-18-04-not-balancing-evenly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The following configuration work fine for me. Running Ubuntu 18.04 ppc64el. And BTW, if you want to use the REAL interface name instead of something like enp0s31f6, just do the following.
vi /etc/default/grub
and add this:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0"
Then rebuilt the boot loader
grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.vfg
Reboot the system and You'll get the real nic name like eth0, eth1...
When it's done, edit this file and make sure it fit with your IP's !!!
vi /etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# For more information, see netplan(5).
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
eth0:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
eth1:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [eth0, eth1]
addresses: [192.168.0.10/24]
gateway4: 192.168.0.1
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
search: [home.lan],
addresses: [192.168.0.250]
Then, type netplan try
to validate your configuration. If successful, run netplan apply
and reboot.
add a comment |
The following configuration work fine for me. Running Ubuntu 18.04 ppc64el. And BTW, if you want to use the REAL interface name instead of something like enp0s31f6, just do the following.
vi /etc/default/grub
and add this:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0"
Then rebuilt the boot loader
grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.vfg
Reboot the system and You'll get the real nic name like eth0, eth1...
When it's done, edit this file and make sure it fit with your IP's !!!
vi /etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# For more information, see netplan(5).
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
eth0:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
eth1:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [eth0, eth1]
addresses: [192.168.0.10/24]
gateway4: 192.168.0.1
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
search: [home.lan],
addresses: [192.168.0.250]
Then, type netplan try
to validate your configuration. If successful, run netplan apply
and reboot.
add a comment |
The following configuration work fine for me. Running Ubuntu 18.04 ppc64el. And BTW, if you want to use the REAL interface name instead of something like enp0s31f6, just do the following.
vi /etc/default/grub
and add this:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0"
Then rebuilt the boot loader
grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.vfg
Reboot the system and You'll get the real nic name like eth0, eth1...
When it's done, edit this file and make sure it fit with your IP's !!!
vi /etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# For more information, see netplan(5).
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
eth0:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
eth1:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [eth0, eth1]
addresses: [192.168.0.10/24]
gateway4: 192.168.0.1
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
search: [home.lan],
addresses: [192.168.0.250]
Then, type netplan try
to validate your configuration. If successful, run netplan apply
and reboot.
The following configuration work fine for me. Running Ubuntu 18.04 ppc64el. And BTW, if you want to use the REAL interface name instead of something like enp0s31f6, just do the following.
vi /etc/default/grub
and add this:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0"
Then rebuilt the boot loader
grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.vfg
Reboot the system and You'll get the real nic name like eth0, eth1...
When it's done, edit this file and make sure it fit with your IP's !!!
vi /etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# For more information, see netplan(5).
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
eth0:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
eth1:
match:
macaddress: 'xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'
wakeonlan: true
bonds:
bond0:
interfaces: [eth0, eth1]
addresses: [192.168.0.10/24]
gateway4: 192.168.0.1
parameters:
mode: 802.3ad
lacp-rate: fast
mii-monitor-interval: 100
mtu: 9000
nameservers:
search: [home.lan],
addresses: [192.168.0.250]
Then, type netplan try
to validate your configuration. If successful, run netplan apply
and reboot.
edited Nov 13 '18 at 23:17
Sean Bright
24515
24515
answered Aug 31 '18 at 19:11
GuyPGuyP
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f913106%2flacp-802-3ad-load-balancing-bonding-on-ubuntu-18-04-not-balancing-evenly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
What
xmit_hash_policy
did you set? According to the kernel documentationlayer2
is the default which could explain the uneven distribution. Set this tolayer3+4
and test again.– Thomas
May 21 '18 at 15:27
1
What traffic had been disbalanced? Inbound or outbound from server?
– Mikhail Khirgiy
May 21 '18 at 16:17