Pointing to problems without suggesting solutionsHandling unsolicited proofs of famous mathematical problemsSuggesting an alternative to referee/reviewer recommendationHow should I handle poor English in reviewing an article that claims to be proofread by two native English speakers?How to React to Incorrect Claims by Reviewers?How to deal with poorly written and formatted papers (as a reviewer)?Published papers with incorrect solutions of famous problems: how to raise concerns with editors?Suggesting connection to one's own paper in a referee reportSuggesting reviewers for a very sectorial double-blind submissionArticle submitted and clearly referee cannot understand basic premise-What to do?Suggesting Reviewers: How to find institutional affiliations
Feels like I am getting dragged in office politics
How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?
Subtleties of choosing the sequence of tenses in Russian
Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?
Please, smoke with good manners
How to create an ad-hoc wireless network in Ubuntu
Asahi Dry Black beer can
How can I get precisely a certain cubic cm by changing the following factors?
If Earth is tilted, why is Polaris always above the same spot?
How to replace the "space symbol" (squat-u) in listings?
How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?
Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?
What's the metal clinking sound at the end of credits in Avengers: Endgame?
How to set the font color of quantity objects (Version 11.3 vs version 12)?
Help, my Death Star suffers from Kessler syndrome!
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
Unexpected email from Yorkshire Bank
Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
Build a trail cart
How does a Swashbuckler rogue "fight with two weapons while safely darting away"?
In the time of the mishna, were there Jewish cities without courts?
Confusion about capacitors
Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions
Handling unsolicited proofs of famous mathematical problemsSuggesting an alternative to referee/reviewer recommendationHow should I handle poor English in reviewing an article that claims to be proofread by two native English speakers?How to React to Incorrect Claims by Reviewers?How to deal with poorly written and formatted papers (as a reviewer)?Published papers with incorrect solutions of famous problems: how to raise concerns with editors?Suggesting connection to one's own paper in a referee reportSuggesting reviewers for a very sectorial double-blind submissionArticle submitted and clearly referee cannot understand basic premise-What to do?Suggesting Reviewers: How to find institutional affiliations
As a peer reviewer, I sometimes feel there are issues in the manuscript but I'm not sure how they should be corrected/addressed, partly due to my inadequate expertise in those exact issues.
I also sometimes find some words/terms are incorrectly used, but as a non-native speaker I can't easily suggest alternatives.
Should I just point to such issues anyway, or ignore them since I couldn't suggest solutions?
peer-review
asked Apr 21 at 18:37
OrionOrion
2,65712644
|
show 1 more comment
As a peer reviewer, I sometimes feel there are issues in the manuscript but I'm not sure how they should be corrected/addressed, partly due to my inadequate expertise in those exact issues.
I also sometimes find some words/terms are incorrectly used, but as a non-native speaker I can't easily suggest alternatives.
Should I just point to such issues anyway, or ignore them since I couldn't suggest solutions?
peer-review
asked Apr 21 at 18:37
OrionOrion
2,65712644
2
If it ends us as a major revision that comes back to you with changes addressing your issues in some way, how would you decide if they have done so sufficiently?
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 18:47
1
@ASimpleAlgorithm perhaps that is why some papers have more than one review cycle...
– Solar Mike
Apr 21 at 19:00
12
@ASimpleAlgorithm It is much easier to check that a proposed solution is correct, than to come up with it in the first place.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 21 at 19:14
@FedericoPoloni that isn't universally true. For example, the proposed solution may be wrong (hence there are very many extremely easy options) whereas the problem of determining if it is correct may be ill-posed or intractable. But my question wasn't necessarily rhetorical. In the kinds of problems you are thinking of, that knowledge of how to determine if a solution is correct can be used to provide guidance or requirements for the authors then when asking for revisions, rather than simply pointing out a shortcoming.
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 20:50
3
@FedericoPoloni This is basically what the P vs NP problem in computer science is about. :)
– David Richerby
Apr 21 at 21:57
|
show 1 more comment
As a peer reviewer, I sometimes feel there are issues in the manuscript but I'm not sure how they should be corrected/addressed, partly due to my inadequate expertise in those exact issues.
I also sometimes find some words/terms are incorrectly used, but as a non-native speaker I can't easily suggest alternatives.
Should I just point to such issues anyway, or ignore them since I couldn't suggest solutions?
peer-review
asked Apr 21 at 18:37
OrionOrion
2,65712644
As a peer reviewer, I sometimes feel there are issues in the manuscript but I'm not sure how they should be corrected/addressed, partly due to my inadequate expertise in those exact issues.
I also sometimes find some words/terms are incorrectly used, but as a non-native speaker I can't easily suggest alternatives.
Should I just point to such issues anyway, or ignore them since I couldn't suggest solutions?
peer-review
peer-review
asked Apr 21 at 18:37
OrionOrion
2,65712644
asked Apr 21 at 18:37
OrionOrion
2,65712644
asked Apr 21 at 18:37
OrionOrion
2,65712644
asked Apr 21 at 18:37
OrionOrion
2,65712644
asked Apr 21 at 18:37
OrionOrion
2,65712644
2,65712644
2
If it ends us as a major revision that comes back to you with changes addressing your issues in some way, how would you decide if they have done so sufficiently?
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 18:47
1
@ASimpleAlgorithm perhaps that is why some papers have more than one review cycle...
– Solar Mike
Apr 21 at 19:00
12
@ASimpleAlgorithm It is much easier to check that a proposed solution is correct, than to come up with it in the first place.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 21 at 19:14
@FedericoPoloni that isn't universally true. For example, the proposed solution may be wrong (hence there are very many extremely easy options) whereas the problem of determining if it is correct may be ill-posed or intractable. But my question wasn't necessarily rhetorical. In the kinds of problems you are thinking of, that knowledge of how to determine if a solution is correct can be used to provide guidance or requirements for the authors then when asking for revisions, rather than simply pointing out a shortcoming.
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 20:50
3
@FedericoPoloni This is basically what the P vs NP problem in computer science is about. :)
– David Richerby
Apr 21 at 21:57
|
show 1 more comment
2
If it ends us as a major revision that comes back to you with changes addressing your issues in some way, how would you decide if they have done so sufficiently?
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 18:47
1
@ASimpleAlgorithm perhaps that is why some papers have more than one review cycle...
– Solar Mike
Apr 21 at 19:00
12
@ASimpleAlgorithm It is much easier to check that a proposed solution is correct, than to come up with it in the first place.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 21 at 19:14
@FedericoPoloni that isn't universally true. For example, the proposed solution may be wrong (hence there are very many extremely easy options) whereas the problem of determining if it is correct may be ill-posed or intractable. But my question wasn't necessarily rhetorical. In the kinds of problems you are thinking of, that knowledge of how to determine if a solution is correct can be used to provide guidance or requirements for the authors then when asking for revisions, rather than simply pointing out a shortcoming.
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 20:50
3
@FedericoPoloni This is basically what the P vs NP problem in computer science is about. :)
– David Richerby
Apr 21 at 21:57
2
2
If it ends us as a major revision that comes back to you with changes addressing your issues in some way, how would you decide if they have done so sufficiently?
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 18:47
If it ends us as a major revision that comes back to you with changes addressing your issues in some way, how would you decide if they have done so sufficiently?
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 18:47
1
1
@ASimpleAlgorithm perhaps that is why some papers have more than one review cycle...
– Solar Mike
Apr 21 at 19:00
@ASimpleAlgorithm perhaps that is why some papers have more than one review cycle...
– Solar Mike
Apr 21 at 19:00
12
12
@ASimpleAlgorithm It is much easier to check that a proposed solution is correct, than to come up with it in the first place.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 21 at 19:14
@ASimpleAlgorithm It is much easier to check that a proposed solution is correct, than to come up with it in the first place.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 21 at 19:14
@FedericoPoloni that isn't universally true. For example, the proposed solution may be wrong (hence there are very many extremely easy options) whereas the problem of determining if it is correct may be ill-posed or intractable. But my question wasn't necessarily rhetorical. In the kinds of problems you are thinking of, that knowledge of how to determine if a solution is correct can be used to provide guidance or requirements for the authors then when asking for revisions, rather than simply pointing out a shortcoming.
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 20:50
@FedericoPoloni that isn't universally true. For example, the proposed solution may be wrong (hence there are very many extremely easy options) whereas the problem of determining if it is correct may be ill-posed or intractable. But my question wasn't necessarily rhetorical. In the kinds of problems you are thinking of, that knowledge of how to determine if a solution is correct can be used to provide guidance or requirements for the authors then when asking for revisions, rather than simply pointing out a shortcoming.
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 20:50
3
3
@FedericoPoloni This is basically what the P vs NP problem in computer science is about. :)
– David Richerby
Apr 21 at 21:57
@FedericoPoloni This is basically what the P vs NP problem in computer science is about. :)
– David Richerby
Apr 21 at 21:57
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Does "peer review" mean you have to re-write the material, or just point out where the flaws may be and the author is meant to sort them?
I suggest it is the latter, so point them out and expect the author to edit / correct or justify what they meant.
edited Apr 21 at 20:18
Buzz
15.5k95179
answered Apr 21 at 18:41
Solar MikeSolar Mike
16.1k62857
7
I think there is a middle ground between "re-write the material" and "just point out where the flaws may be". I'm not familiar with academic processes but as a general practice the most helpful feedback usually does more than just point out flaws; it steers people in the right direction. This doesn't require doing the work for them. I think your answer hints at a false dichotomy that David Richerby's answer addresses a bit better.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:18
@quant so how does this "it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper" in one of the other answers sit with you? Perhaps the primary function of a reviewer is to point out the issues and a secondary function is to provide solutions. How have you found the review process for a paper you submitted? I found it helpful - especially when discussed with my supervisor.
– Solar Mike
Apr 22 at 7:20
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:57
1
This is roughly my attitude, but: Sometimes I'd rather (because it's less work) suggest a different wording for a sentence or even a paragraph, rather than see the paper again. If the author takes my suggestion and the editor sees that, the review process is over. Otherwise, I get another thing in my inbox. And sometimes I'm more altruistic; wanting to help a student or non-native speaker learn to make better papers.
– B. Goddard
Apr 22 at 12:54
add a comment |
Yes, you should point them out. You should point out solutions to problems when you know what the solution is but, at the end of the day, it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper, not yours.
answered Apr 21 at 21:59
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
30.6k662127
add a comment |
A story (and many other intersting ones) I once heard from an editorial board member of Physical Review Letters, who gave an overview talk on the editorial process of that journal at a conference, was that sometimes it happens that the reviewer switches sides and becomes a collaborator of the authors they reviewed initially.
While at first this sound strange (certainly did to me at that time as a young PhD student), I think this is more appropriate then outlining new solutions (which is nice but not necessary) the authors did not think of. I also don't think 1-2 major revisions are a good spot to discuss/recommend in-depth new solutions to a manuscript. It's common to request further data analysis/evaluation or additional measurements. But if there are major flaws in the manuscript/methodology, you should point to it, but personally I would advise/vote then to reject the manuscript for this reason.
Concerning grammar and language mistakes: The associate editor can reject publication of a manuscript, even if the peer reviewer don't vote for further revisions (due to content or language level). It's not your duty to improve the language and associate editors regulary recommend commercial english editing services, when the language level is below the standards of the journal. Personally, if I see a lot of spelling and grammar mistakes, I don't point the authors to every single one, I mention 2 or 3 to the editor and the rest is his job, not mine, especially if the manuscript is multi-authored.
answered Apr 21 at 22:42
user847982user847982
1,271412
add a comment |
You should definitively point them out, the editor might want to get an additional reviewer on those issues, and the authors can still write a nice rebuttal letter saying that the problem confusing you had been thouroughly addressed half a page earlier and they don't feel responsible for your short attention span or your incomplete grasp on English grammar. ;-)
answered Apr 21 at 23:15
KarlKarl
1,339514
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128469%2fpointing-to-problems-without-suggesting-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Does "peer review" mean you have to re-write the material, or just point out where the flaws may be and the author is meant to sort them?
I suggest it is the latter, so point them out and expect the author to edit / correct or justify what they meant.
edited Apr 21 at 20:18
Buzz
15.5k95179
answered Apr 21 at 18:41
Solar MikeSolar Mike
16.1k62857
7
I think there is a middle ground between "re-write the material" and "just point out where the flaws may be". I'm not familiar with academic processes but as a general practice the most helpful feedback usually does more than just point out flaws; it steers people in the right direction. This doesn't require doing the work for them. I think your answer hints at a false dichotomy that David Richerby's answer addresses a bit better.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:18
@quant so how does this "it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper" in one of the other answers sit with you? Perhaps the primary function of a reviewer is to point out the issues and a secondary function is to provide solutions. How have you found the review process for a paper you submitted? I found it helpful - especially when discussed with my supervisor.
– Solar Mike
Apr 22 at 7:20
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:57
1
This is roughly my attitude, but: Sometimes I'd rather (because it's less work) suggest a different wording for a sentence or even a paragraph, rather than see the paper again. If the author takes my suggestion and the editor sees that, the review process is over. Otherwise, I get another thing in my inbox. And sometimes I'm more altruistic; wanting to help a student or non-native speaker learn to make better papers.
– B. Goddard
Apr 22 at 12:54
add a comment |
Does "peer review" mean you have to re-write the material, or just point out where the flaws may be and the author is meant to sort them?
I suggest it is the latter, so point them out and expect the author to edit / correct or justify what they meant.
edited Apr 21 at 20:18
Buzz
15.5k95179
answered Apr 21 at 18:41
Solar MikeSolar Mike
16.1k62857
7
I think there is a middle ground between "re-write the material" and "just point out where the flaws may be". I'm not familiar with academic processes but as a general practice the most helpful feedback usually does more than just point out flaws; it steers people in the right direction. This doesn't require doing the work for them. I think your answer hints at a false dichotomy that David Richerby's answer addresses a bit better.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:18
@quant so how does this "it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper" in one of the other answers sit with you? Perhaps the primary function of a reviewer is to point out the issues and a secondary function is to provide solutions. How have you found the review process for a paper you submitted? I found it helpful - especially when discussed with my supervisor.
– Solar Mike
Apr 22 at 7:20
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:57
1
This is roughly my attitude, but: Sometimes I'd rather (because it's less work) suggest a different wording for a sentence or even a paragraph, rather than see the paper again. If the author takes my suggestion and the editor sees that, the review process is over. Otherwise, I get another thing in my inbox. And sometimes I'm more altruistic; wanting to help a student or non-native speaker learn to make better papers.
– B. Goddard
Apr 22 at 12:54
add a comment |
Does "peer review" mean you have to re-write the material, or just point out where the flaws may be and the author is meant to sort them?
I suggest it is the latter, so point them out and expect the author to edit / correct or justify what they meant.
edited Apr 21 at 20:18
Buzz
15.5k95179
answered Apr 21 at 18:41
Solar MikeSolar Mike
16.1k62857
Does "peer review" mean you have to re-write the material, or just point out where the flaws may be and the author is meant to sort them?
I suggest it is the latter, so point them out and expect the author to edit / correct or justify what they meant.
edited Apr 21 at 20:18
Buzz
15.5k95179
answered Apr 21 at 18:41
Solar MikeSolar Mike
16.1k62857
edited Apr 21 at 20:18
Buzz
15.5k95179
edited Apr 21 at 20:18
Buzz
15.5k95179
edited Apr 21 at 20:18
Buzz
15.5k95179
15.5k95179
answered Apr 21 at 18:41
Solar MikeSolar Mike
16.1k62857
answered Apr 21 at 18:41
Solar MikeSolar Mike
16.1k62857
answered Apr 21 at 18:41
Solar MikeSolar Mike
16.1k62857
16.1k62857
7
I think there is a middle ground between "re-write the material" and "just point out where the flaws may be". I'm not familiar with academic processes but as a general practice the most helpful feedback usually does more than just point out flaws; it steers people in the right direction. This doesn't require doing the work for them. I think your answer hints at a false dichotomy that David Richerby's answer addresses a bit better.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:18
@quant so how does this "it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper" in one of the other answers sit with you? Perhaps the primary function of a reviewer is to point out the issues and a secondary function is to provide solutions. How have you found the review process for a paper you submitted? I found it helpful - especially when discussed with my supervisor.
– Solar Mike
Apr 22 at 7:20
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:57
1
This is roughly my attitude, but: Sometimes I'd rather (because it's less work) suggest a different wording for a sentence or even a paragraph, rather than see the paper again. If the author takes my suggestion and the editor sees that, the review process is over. Otherwise, I get another thing in my inbox. And sometimes I'm more altruistic; wanting to help a student or non-native speaker learn to make better papers.
– B. Goddard
Apr 22 at 12:54
add a comment |
7
I think there is a middle ground between "re-write the material" and "just point out where the flaws may be". I'm not familiar with academic processes but as a general practice the most helpful feedback usually does more than just point out flaws; it steers people in the right direction. This doesn't require doing the work for them. I think your answer hints at a false dichotomy that David Richerby's answer addresses a bit better.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:18
@quant so how does this "it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper" in one of the other answers sit with you? Perhaps the primary function of a reviewer is to point out the issues and a secondary function is to provide solutions. How have you found the review process for a paper you submitted? I found it helpful - especially when discussed with my supervisor.
– Solar Mike
Apr 22 at 7:20
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:57
1
This is roughly my attitude, but: Sometimes I'd rather (because it's less work) suggest a different wording for a sentence or even a paragraph, rather than see the paper again. If the author takes my suggestion and the editor sees that, the review process is over. Otherwise, I get another thing in my inbox. And sometimes I'm more altruistic; wanting to help a student or non-native speaker learn to make better papers.
– B. Goddard
Apr 22 at 12:54
7
7
I think there is a middle ground between "re-write the material" and "just point out where the flaws may be". I'm not familiar with academic processes but as a general practice the most helpful feedback usually does more than just point out flaws; it steers people in the right direction. This doesn't require doing the work for them. I think your answer hints at a false dichotomy that David Richerby's answer addresses a bit better.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:18
I think there is a middle ground between "re-write the material" and "just point out where the flaws may be". I'm not familiar with academic processes but as a general practice the most helpful feedback usually does more than just point out flaws; it steers people in the right direction. This doesn't require doing the work for them. I think your answer hints at a false dichotomy that David Richerby's answer addresses a bit better.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:18
@quant so how does this "it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper" in one of the other answers sit with you? Perhaps the primary function of a reviewer is to point out the issues and a secondary function is to provide solutions. How have you found the review process for a paper you submitted? I found it helpful - especially when discussed with my supervisor.
– Solar Mike
Apr 22 at 7:20
@quant so how does this "it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper" in one of the other answers sit with you? Perhaps the primary function of a reviewer is to point out the issues and a secondary function is to provide solutions. How have you found the review process for a paper you submitted? I found it helpful - especially when discussed with my supervisor.
– Solar Mike
Apr 22 at 7:20
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:57
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
– quant
Apr 22 at 7:57
1
1
This is roughly my attitude, but: Sometimes I'd rather (because it's less work) suggest a different wording for a sentence or even a paragraph, rather than see the paper again. If the author takes my suggestion and the editor sees that, the review process is over. Otherwise, I get another thing in my inbox. And sometimes I'm more altruistic; wanting to help a student or non-native speaker learn to make better papers.
– B. Goddard
Apr 22 at 12:54
This is roughly my attitude, but: Sometimes I'd rather (because it's less work) suggest a different wording for a sentence or even a paragraph, rather than see the paper again. If the author takes my suggestion and the editor sees that, the review process is over. Otherwise, I get another thing in my inbox. And sometimes I'm more altruistic; wanting to help a student or non-native speaker learn to make better papers.
– B. Goddard
Apr 22 at 12:54
add a comment |
Yes, you should point them out. You should point out solutions to problems when you know what the solution is but, at the end of the day, it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper, not yours.
answered Apr 21 at 21:59
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
30.6k662127
add a comment |
Yes, you should point them out. You should point out solutions to problems when you know what the solution is but, at the end of the day, it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper, not yours.
answered Apr 21 at 21:59
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
30.6k662127
add a comment |
Yes, you should point them out. You should point out solutions to problems when you know what the solution is but, at the end of the day, it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper, not yours.
answered Apr 21 at 21:59
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
30.6k662127
Yes, you should point them out. You should point out solutions to problems when you know what the solution is but, at the end of the day, it's the authors' responsibility to write their paper, not yours.
answered Apr 21 at 21:59
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
30.6k662127
answered Apr 21 at 21:59
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
30.6k662127
answered Apr 21 at 21:59
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
30.6k662127
answered Apr 21 at 21:59
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
30.6k662127
30.6k662127
add a comment |
add a comment |
A story (and many other intersting ones) I once heard from an editorial board member of Physical Review Letters, who gave an overview talk on the editorial process of that journal at a conference, was that sometimes it happens that the reviewer switches sides and becomes a collaborator of the authors they reviewed initially.
While at first this sound strange (certainly did to me at that time as a young PhD student), I think this is more appropriate then outlining new solutions (which is nice but not necessary) the authors did not think of. I also don't think 1-2 major revisions are a good spot to discuss/recommend in-depth new solutions to a manuscript. It's common to request further data analysis/evaluation or additional measurements. But if there are major flaws in the manuscript/methodology, you should point to it, but personally I would advise/vote then to reject the manuscript for this reason.
Concerning grammar and language mistakes: The associate editor can reject publication of a manuscript, even if the peer reviewer don't vote for further revisions (due to content or language level). It's not your duty to improve the language and associate editors regulary recommend commercial english editing services, when the language level is below the standards of the journal. Personally, if I see a lot of spelling and grammar mistakes, I don't point the authors to every single one, I mention 2 or 3 to the editor and the rest is his job, not mine, especially if the manuscript is multi-authored.
answered Apr 21 at 22:42
user847982user847982
1,271412
add a comment |
A story (and many other intersting ones) I once heard from an editorial board member of Physical Review Letters, who gave an overview talk on the editorial process of that journal at a conference, was that sometimes it happens that the reviewer switches sides and becomes a collaborator of the authors they reviewed initially.
While at first this sound strange (certainly did to me at that time as a young PhD student), I think this is more appropriate then outlining new solutions (which is nice but not necessary) the authors did not think of. I also don't think 1-2 major revisions are a good spot to discuss/recommend in-depth new solutions to a manuscript. It's common to request further data analysis/evaluation or additional measurements. But if there are major flaws in the manuscript/methodology, you should point to it, but personally I would advise/vote then to reject the manuscript for this reason.
Concerning grammar and language mistakes: The associate editor can reject publication of a manuscript, even if the peer reviewer don't vote for further revisions (due to content or language level). It's not your duty to improve the language and associate editors regulary recommend commercial english editing services, when the language level is below the standards of the journal. Personally, if I see a lot of spelling and grammar mistakes, I don't point the authors to every single one, I mention 2 or 3 to the editor and the rest is his job, not mine, especially if the manuscript is multi-authored.
answered Apr 21 at 22:42
user847982user847982
1,271412
add a comment |
A story (and many other intersting ones) I once heard from an editorial board member of Physical Review Letters, who gave an overview talk on the editorial process of that journal at a conference, was that sometimes it happens that the reviewer switches sides and becomes a collaborator of the authors they reviewed initially.
While at first this sound strange (certainly did to me at that time as a young PhD student), I think this is more appropriate then outlining new solutions (which is nice but not necessary) the authors did not think of. I also don't think 1-2 major revisions are a good spot to discuss/recommend in-depth new solutions to a manuscript. It's common to request further data analysis/evaluation or additional measurements. But if there are major flaws in the manuscript/methodology, you should point to it, but personally I would advise/vote then to reject the manuscript for this reason.
Concerning grammar and language mistakes: The associate editor can reject publication of a manuscript, even if the peer reviewer don't vote for further revisions (due to content or language level). It's not your duty to improve the language and associate editors regulary recommend commercial english editing services, when the language level is below the standards of the journal. Personally, if I see a lot of spelling and grammar mistakes, I don't point the authors to every single one, I mention 2 or 3 to the editor and the rest is his job, not mine, especially if the manuscript is multi-authored.
answered Apr 21 at 22:42
user847982user847982
1,271412
A story (and many other intersting ones) I once heard from an editorial board member of Physical Review Letters, who gave an overview talk on the editorial process of that journal at a conference, was that sometimes it happens that the reviewer switches sides and becomes a collaborator of the authors they reviewed initially.
While at first this sound strange (certainly did to me at that time as a young PhD student), I think this is more appropriate then outlining new solutions (which is nice but not necessary) the authors did not think of. I also don't think 1-2 major revisions are a good spot to discuss/recommend in-depth new solutions to a manuscript. It's common to request further data analysis/evaluation or additional measurements. But if there are major flaws in the manuscript/methodology, you should point to it, but personally I would advise/vote then to reject the manuscript for this reason.
Concerning grammar and language mistakes: The associate editor can reject publication of a manuscript, even if the peer reviewer don't vote for further revisions (due to content or language level). It's not your duty to improve the language and associate editors regulary recommend commercial english editing services, when the language level is below the standards of the journal. Personally, if I see a lot of spelling and grammar mistakes, I don't point the authors to every single one, I mention 2 or 3 to the editor and the rest is his job, not mine, especially if the manuscript is multi-authored.
answered Apr 21 at 22:42
user847982user847982
1,271412
answered Apr 21 at 22:42
user847982user847982
1,271412
answered Apr 21 at 22:42
user847982user847982
1,271412
answered Apr 21 at 22:42
user847982user847982
1,271412
1,271412
add a comment |
add a comment |
You should definitively point them out, the editor might want to get an additional reviewer on those issues, and the authors can still write a nice rebuttal letter saying that the problem confusing you had been thouroughly addressed half a page earlier and they don't feel responsible for your short attention span or your incomplete grasp on English grammar. ;-)
answered Apr 21 at 23:15
KarlKarl
1,339514
add a comment |
You should definitively point them out, the editor might want to get an additional reviewer on those issues, and the authors can still write a nice rebuttal letter saying that the problem confusing you had been thouroughly addressed half a page earlier and they don't feel responsible for your short attention span or your incomplete grasp on English grammar. ;-)
answered Apr 21 at 23:15
KarlKarl
1,339514
add a comment |
You should definitively point them out, the editor might want to get an additional reviewer on those issues, and the authors can still write a nice rebuttal letter saying that the problem confusing you had been thouroughly addressed half a page earlier and they don't feel responsible for your short attention span or your incomplete grasp on English grammar. ;-)
answered Apr 21 at 23:15
KarlKarl
1,339514
You should definitively point them out, the editor might want to get an additional reviewer on those issues, and the authors can still write a nice rebuttal letter saying that the problem confusing you had been thouroughly addressed half a page earlier and they don't feel responsible for your short attention span or your incomplete grasp on English grammar. ;-)
answered Apr 21 at 23:15
KarlKarl
1,339514
answered Apr 21 at 23:15
KarlKarl
1,339514
answered Apr 21 at 23:15
KarlKarl
1,339514
answered Apr 21 at 23:15
KarlKarl
1,339514
1,339514
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128469%2fpointing-to-problems-without-suggesting-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
If it ends us as a major revision that comes back to you with changes addressing your issues in some way, how would you decide if they have done so sufficiently?
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 18:47
1
@ASimpleAlgorithm perhaps that is why some papers have more than one review cycle...
– Solar Mike
Apr 21 at 19:00
12
@ASimpleAlgorithm It is much easier to check that a proposed solution is correct, than to come up with it in the first place.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 21 at 19:14
@FedericoPoloni that isn't universally true. For example, the proposed solution may be wrong (hence there are very many extremely easy options) whereas the problem of determining if it is correct may be ill-posed or intractable. But my question wasn't necessarily rhetorical. In the kinds of problems you are thinking of, that knowledge of how to determine if a solution is correct can be used to provide guidance or requirements for the authors then when asking for revisions, rather than simply pointing out a shortcoming.
– A Simple Algorithm
Apr 21 at 20:50
3
@FedericoPoloni This is basically what the P vs NP problem in computer science is about. :)
– David Richerby
Apr 21 at 21:57