Using the “a” preposition with “echar de menos” and a personal objectWhen is the indirect object pronoun required in sentences with an indirect object?How to deal with personal direct object and indirect object?Indirect Object and neuter “lo” usage with inanimate objectsUsing “atrás” with “volver”Object pronouns with the subjunctivePreposition and direct objects which are personsUsing se with the first person singular conjugationLlevar + past participle: agreement with objectPassive voice with direct and indirect object pronounsUsing the imperfect indicative vs. subjunctive with “si”
How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope
Western buddy movie with a supernatural twist where a woman turns into an eagle at the end
Why doesn't using multiple commands with a || or && conditional work?
Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?
Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?
Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?
Alternative to sending password over mail?
What to put in ESTA if staying in US for a few days before going on to Canada
Emailing HOD to enhance faculty application
Why is the 'in' operator throwing an error with a string literal instead of logging false?
Blender 2.8 I can't see vertices, edges or faces in edit mode
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
How can I tell someone that I want to be his or her friend?
90's TV series where a boy goes to another dimension through portal near power lines
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?
A reference to a well-known characterization of scattered compact spaces
Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?
What is going on with Captain Marvel's blood colour?
In Romance of the Three Kingdoms why do people still use bamboo sticks when paper had already been invented?
How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?
When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?
Arrow those variables!
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
Using the “a” preposition with “echar de menos” and a personal object
When is the indirect object pronoun required in sentences with an indirect object?How to deal with personal direct object and indirect object?Indirect Object and neuter “lo” usage with inanimate objectsUsing “atrás” with “volver”Object pronouns with the subjunctivePreposition and direct objects which are personsUsing se with the first person singular conjugationLlevar + past participle: agreement with objectPassive voice with direct and indirect object pronounsUsing the imperfect indicative vs. subjunctive with “si”
I'm a bit fuzzy on how the "personal a" works in Spanish, for example in this passage from Harry Potter y la cámera secreta:
Nunca se había sentido tan solo. Antes que ninguna otra cosa de Hogwarts, antes incluso que jugar al quidditch, lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger.
I'm new to echar de menos
too, so my understanding is that Harry is the subject of echar
, and lo que
is its direct object.
I'm a little surprised you wouldn't use a lo que
here rather than just lo que
, considering the a
that follows. Would a lo que
also be grammatical? What about if you reordered the clauses to A sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger, era (a?) lo que de verdad echaba de menos.
?
A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish gives a related example: A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad
.
gramática
add a comment |
I'm a bit fuzzy on how the "personal a" works in Spanish, for example in this passage from Harry Potter y la cámera secreta:
Nunca se había sentido tan solo. Antes que ninguna otra cosa de Hogwarts, antes incluso que jugar al quidditch, lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger.
I'm new to echar de menos
too, so my understanding is that Harry is the subject of echar
, and lo que
is its direct object.
I'm a little surprised you wouldn't use a lo que
here rather than just lo que
, considering the a
that follows. Would a lo que
also be grammatical? What about if you reordered the clauses to A sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger, era (a?) lo que de verdad echaba de menos.
?
A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish gives a related example: A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad
.
gramática
add a comment |
I'm a bit fuzzy on how the "personal a" works in Spanish, for example in this passage from Harry Potter y la cámera secreta:
Nunca se había sentido tan solo. Antes que ninguna otra cosa de Hogwarts, antes incluso que jugar al quidditch, lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger.
I'm new to echar de menos
too, so my understanding is that Harry is the subject of echar
, and lo que
is its direct object.
I'm a little surprised you wouldn't use a lo que
here rather than just lo que
, considering the a
that follows. Would a lo que
also be grammatical? What about if you reordered the clauses to A sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger, era (a?) lo que de verdad echaba de menos.
?
A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish gives a related example: A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad
.
gramática
I'm a bit fuzzy on how the "personal a" works in Spanish, for example in this passage from Harry Potter y la cámera secreta:
Nunca se había sentido tan solo. Antes que ninguna otra cosa de Hogwarts, antes incluso que jugar al quidditch, lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger.
I'm new to echar de menos
too, so my understanding is that Harry is the subject of echar
, and lo que
is its direct object.
I'm a little surprised you wouldn't use a lo que
here rather than just lo que
, considering the a
that follows. Would a lo que
also be grammatical? What about if you reordered the clauses to A sus mejores amigos, Ron Weasley y Hermione Granger, era (a?) lo que de verdad echaba de menos.
?
A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish gives a related example: A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad
.
gramática
gramática
edited 2 days ago
Charlie
48.1k1088222
48.1k1088222
asked Apr 2 at 5:36
Alan O'DonnellAlan O'Donnell
1773
1773
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Note that the "related example" may not be as related as you think. In the sentence
A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad
the object ("casualidad") is not a person, and even so it carries an a. What happens here is that the verb temer, with the sense of "to fear something" can be used in Spanish both as a transitive or intransitive verb. In the latter case, you will always need the a preposition. You can tell if the verb is being used as transitive or intransitive by the use of la/le/lo:
Temer(le) a los gatos.
Temer(le) a la oscuridad.
Temer(le) a la casualidad.
But:
Temer a los gatos > Temerlos.
Temer la oscuridad > Temerla.
Temer la casualidad > Temerla.
The Harry Potter example, nonetheless, is different. The verbal locution echar de menos always acts as a transitive verb. So in this case you will need the personal a:
Echo de menos a mi gato.
Echo de menos la oscuridad.
Echo de menos estar con mis amigos.
But then, what happens with the Harry Potter example? Isn't it talking about his friends? Yes, but (as I hinted in a previous example) it happens that when the object is substituted with la or lo, you don't need the preposition any more:
—¿Echas de menos a tus amigos?
—Sí, los echo de menos.
So, as the sentence starts with a lo, the preposition is not needed:
Lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos.
Finally, note that if you make sus mejores amigos the subject of the sentence, you don't need the preposition either:
Sus mejores amigos eran lo que de verdad echaba de menos.
Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".
– Alan O'Donnell
2 days ago
1
@AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".
– Charlie
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "353"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspanish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29030%2fusing-the-a-preposition-with-echar-de-menos-and-a-personal-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Note that the "related example" may not be as related as you think. In the sentence
A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad
the object ("casualidad") is not a person, and even so it carries an a. What happens here is that the verb temer, with the sense of "to fear something" can be used in Spanish both as a transitive or intransitive verb. In the latter case, you will always need the a preposition. You can tell if the verb is being used as transitive or intransitive by the use of la/le/lo:
Temer(le) a los gatos.
Temer(le) a la oscuridad.
Temer(le) a la casualidad.
But:
Temer a los gatos > Temerlos.
Temer la oscuridad > Temerla.
Temer la casualidad > Temerla.
The Harry Potter example, nonetheless, is different. The verbal locution echar de menos always acts as a transitive verb. So in this case you will need the personal a:
Echo de menos a mi gato.
Echo de menos la oscuridad.
Echo de menos estar con mis amigos.
But then, what happens with the Harry Potter example? Isn't it talking about his friends? Yes, but (as I hinted in a previous example) it happens that when the object is substituted with la or lo, you don't need the preposition any more:
—¿Echas de menos a tus amigos?
—Sí, los echo de menos.
So, as the sentence starts with a lo, the preposition is not needed:
Lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos.
Finally, note that if you make sus mejores amigos the subject of the sentence, you don't need the preposition either:
Sus mejores amigos eran lo que de verdad echaba de menos.
Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".
– Alan O'Donnell
2 days ago
1
@AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".
– Charlie
2 days ago
add a comment |
Note that the "related example" may not be as related as you think. In the sentence
A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad
the object ("casualidad") is not a person, and even so it carries an a. What happens here is that the verb temer, with the sense of "to fear something" can be used in Spanish both as a transitive or intransitive verb. In the latter case, you will always need the a preposition. You can tell if the verb is being used as transitive or intransitive by the use of la/le/lo:
Temer(le) a los gatos.
Temer(le) a la oscuridad.
Temer(le) a la casualidad.
But:
Temer a los gatos > Temerlos.
Temer la oscuridad > Temerla.
Temer la casualidad > Temerla.
The Harry Potter example, nonetheless, is different. The verbal locution echar de menos always acts as a transitive verb. So in this case you will need the personal a:
Echo de menos a mi gato.
Echo de menos la oscuridad.
Echo de menos estar con mis amigos.
But then, what happens with the Harry Potter example? Isn't it talking about his friends? Yes, but (as I hinted in a previous example) it happens that when the object is substituted with la or lo, you don't need the preposition any more:
—¿Echas de menos a tus amigos?
—Sí, los echo de menos.
So, as the sentence starts with a lo, the preposition is not needed:
Lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos.
Finally, note that if you make sus mejores amigos the subject of the sentence, you don't need the preposition either:
Sus mejores amigos eran lo que de verdad echaba de menos.
Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".
– Alan O'Donnell
2 days ago
1
@AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".
– Charlie
2 days ago
add a comment |
Note that the "related example" may not be as related as you think. In the sentence
A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad
the object ("casualidad") is not a person, and even so it carries an a. What happens here is that the verb temer, with the sense of "to fear something" can be used in Spanish both as a transitive or intransitive verb. In the latter case, you will always need the a preposition. You can tell if the verb is being used as transitive or intransitive by the use of la/le/lo:
Temer(le) a los gatos.
Temer(le) a la oscuridad.
Temer(le) a la casualidad.
But:
Temer a los gatos > Temerlos.
Temer la oscuridad > Temerla.
Temer la casualidad > Temerla.
The Harry Potter example, nonetheless, is different. The verbal locution echar de menos always acts as a transitive verb. So in this case you will need the personal a:
Echo de menos a mi gato.
Echo de menos la oscuridad.
Echo de menos estar con mis amigos.
But then, what happens with the Harry Potter example? Isn't it talking about his friends? Yes, but (as I hinted in a previous example) it happens that when the object is substituted with la or lo, you don't need the preposition any more:
—¿Echas de menos a tus amigos?
—Sí, los echo de menos.
So, as the sentence starts with a lo, the preposition is not needed:
Lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos.
Finally, note that if you make sus mejores amigos the subject of the sentence, you don't need the preposition either:
Sus mejores amigos eran lo que de verdad echaba de menos.
Note that the "related example" may not be as related as you think. In the sentence
A lo que yo temo es a la maldita casualidad
the object ("casualidad") is not a person, and even so it carries an a. What happens here is that the verb temer, with the sense of "to fear something" can be used in Spanish both as a transitive or intransitive verb. In the latter case, you will always need the a preposition. You can tell if the verb is being used as transitive or intransitive by the use of la/le/lo:
Temer(le) a los gatos.
Temer(le) a la oscuridad.
Temer(le) a la casualidad.
But:
Temer a los gatos > Temerlos.
Temer la oscuridad > Temerla.
Temer la casualidad > Temerla.
The Harry Potter example, nonetheless, is different. The verbal locution echar de menos always acts as a transitive verb. So in this case you will need the personal a:
Echo de menos a mi gato.
Echo de menos la oscuridad.
Echo de menos estar con mis amigos.
But then, what happens with the Harry Potter example? Isn't it talking about his friends? Yes, but (as I hinted in a previous example) it happens that when the object is substituted with la or lo, you don't need the preposition any more:
—¿Echas de menos a tus amigos?
—Sí, los echo de menos.
So, as the sentence starts with a lo, the preposition is not needed:
Lo que de verdad echaba de menos era a sus mejores amigos.
Finally, note that if you make sus mejores amigos the subject of the sentence, you don't need the preposition either:
Sus mejores amigos eran lo que de verdad echaba de menos.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
CharlieCharlie
48.1k1088222
48.1k1088222
Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".
– Alan O'Donnell
2 days ago
1
@AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".
– Charlie
2 days ago
add a comment |
Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".
– Alan O'Donnell
2 days ago
1
@AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".
– Charlie
2 days ago
Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".
– Alan O'Donnell
2 days ago
Really helpful answer, thank you. I'm a bit confused about your first point though: what would be a transitive example of temer? To include more context from A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, they wanted to make the point that la casualidad, while not a person, is sort of "personified", and hence takes a personal a. They also give the example "Los cazas llevan bengalas para confundir a un misil dirigido" as another "personified" direct object, and mention that this is common with verbs like confundir, temer, admirar, etc., that tend by their nature to this "personification".
– Alan O'Donnell
2 days ago
1
1
@AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".
– Charlie
2 days ago
@AlanO'Donnell I don't think that "la oscuridad" is being personified, it is just being used as an indirect object. I have expanded my answer with your concerns. Your "confundir" example may be different, as you can only confuse intelligent things (a dumb thing cannot be confused), so in this case the missile is supposed to be provided with an intelligent system able to be confused, hence it is being "personified".
– Charlie
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Spanish Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspanish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29030%2fusing-the-a-preposition-with-echar-de-menos-and-a-personal-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown