What's the meaning of “Sollensaussagen”?What is the meaning of the dative in this sentence: “Dem Tod die Toten.”What's the meaning of “zur Frau werden”?What's the meaning of “schon”?What's the meaning of 'erl'?What's the meaning of “be-” prefix?What's the meaning of “würde”?Meaning of “Abgechecktheit”»… Vertauschung der beiden Farben in irgend einem Wappen.« : is that only a “mix-up” (on one coat of arms)?What does the word “Kraftäußerung” mean?What's the translation of the expression 'zu geben schien'?

What's that red-plus icon near a text?

Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?

Can a monk's single staff be considered dual wielded, as per the Dual Wielder feat?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

Cross compiling for RPi - error while loading shared libraries

expand `ifthenelse` immediately

Unable to deploy metadata from Partner Developer scratch org because of extra fields

Roll the carpet

Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Convert two switches to a dual stack, and add outlet - possible here?

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

RSA: Danger of using p to create q

What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?

dbcc cleantable batch size explanation

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

Theorems that impeded progress

Can a vampire attack twice with their claws using Multiattack?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?



What's the meaning of “Sollensaussagen”?


What is the meaning of the dative in this sentence: “Dem Tod die Toten.”What's the meaning of “zur Frau werden”?What's the meaning of “schon”?What's the meaning of 'erl'?What's the meaning of “be-” prefix?What's the meaning of “würde”?Meaning of “Abgechecktheit”»… Vertauschung der beiden Farben in irgend einem Wappen.« : is that only a “mix-up” (on one coat of arms)?What does the word “Kraftäußerung” mean?What's the translation of the expression 'zu geben schien'?













8















I'm reading the introduction to Kant's Grundlegung der Metaphysik der Sitten and came across this line




In den beiden Schriften untersucht Kant die Voraussetzungen und die Möglichkeit moralisch verbindlicher Sollensaussagen.




The problem is that I can't seem to find a definition for this word anywhere, as if it didn't even exist.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    I'm tripping there even as a native German reader, mostly because of the Fugen- (or Genitive-?) S. The recent speling reforms encourage hyphenating when it improves understanding, see duden.de/sprachwissen/rechtschreibregeln/bindestrich. If we hyphenate Sollens-Aussagen it might clear the issue up.

    – Peter A. Schneider
    2 days ago







  • 1





    One complication with this word is that it contains a number of misleading candidates for composition: "(das) Sollen, "(des) Sollens", "(die) Sau", "saus[e[n]]", "sagen". "Saussagen"? "Sollensaus"?

    – Peter A. Schneider
    2 days ago
















8















I'm reading the introduction to Kant's Grundlegung der Metaphysik der Sitten and came across this line




In den beiden Schriften untersucht Kant die Voraussetzungen und die Möglichkeit moralisch verbindlicher Sollensaussagen.




The problem is that I can't seem to find a definition for this word anywhere, as if it didn't even exist.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    I'm tripping there even as a native German reader, mostly because of the Fugen- (or Genitive-?) S. The recent speling reforms encourage hyphenating when it improves understanding, see duden.de/sprachwissen/rechtschreibregeln/bindestrich. If we hyphenate Sollens-Aussagen it might clear the issue up.

    – Peter A. Schneider
    2 days ago







  • 1





    One complication with this word is that it contains a number of misleading candidates for composition: "(das) Sollen, "(des) Sollens", "(die) Sau", "saus[e[n]]", "sagen". "Saussagen"? "Sollensaus"?

    – Peter A. Schneider
    2 days ago














8












8








8








I'm reading the introduction to Kant's Grundlegung der Metaphysik der Sitten and came across this line




In den beiden Schriften untersucht Kant die Voraussetzungen und die Möglichkeit moralisch verbindlicher Sollensaussagen.




The problem is that I can't seem to find a definition for this word anywhere, as if it didn't even exist.










share|improve this question
















I'm reading the introduction to Kant's Grundlegung der Metaphysik der Sitten and came across this line




In den beiden Schriften untersucht Kant die Voraussetzungen und die Möglichkeit moralisch verbindlicher Sollensaussagen.




The problem is that I can't seem to find a definition for this word anywhere, as if it didn't even exist.







meaning






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 2 at 18:35









David Vogt

4,6451330




4,6451330










asked Apr 2 at 18:15









Ezequiel BarbosaEzequiel Barbosa

28018




28018







  • 1





    I'm tripping there even as a native German reader, mostly because of the Fugen- (or Genitive-?) S. The recent speling reforms encourage hyphenating when it improves understanding, see duden.de/sprachwissen/rechtschreibregeln/bindestrich. If we hyphenate Sollens-Aussagen it might clear the issue up.

    – Peter A. Schneider
    2 days ago







  • 1





    One complication with this word is that it contains a number of misleading candidates for composition: "(das) Sollen, "(des) Sollens", "(die) Sau", "saus[e[n]]", "sagen". "Saussagen"? "Sollensaus"?

    – Peter A. Schneider
    2 days ago













  • 1





    I'm tripping there even as a native German reader, mostly because of the Fugen- (or Genitive-?) S. The recent speling reforms encourage hyphenating when it improves understanding, see duden.de/sprachwissen/rechtschreibregeln/bindestrich. If we hyphenate Sollens-Aussagen it might clear the issue up.

    – Peter A. Schneider
    2 days ago







  • 1





    One complication with this word is that it contains a number of misleading candidates for composition: "(das) Sollen, "(des) Sollens", "(die) Sau", "saus[e[n]]", "sagen". "Saussagen"? "Sollensaus"?

    – Peter A. Schneider
    2 days ago








1




1





I'm tripping there even as a native German reader, mostly because of the Fugen- (or Genitive-?) S. The recent speling reforms encourage hyphenating when it improves understanding, see duden.de/sprachwissen/rechtschreibregeln/bindestrich. If we hyphenate Sollens-Aussagen it might clear the issue up.

– Peter A. Schneider
2 days ago






I'm tripping there even as a native German reader, mostly because of the Fugen- (or Genitive-?) S. The recent speling reforms encourage hyphenating when it improves understanding, see duden.de/sprachwissen/rechtschreibregeln/bindestrich. If we hyphenate Sollens-Aussagen it might clear the issue up.

– Peter A. Schneider
2 days ago





1




1





One complication with this word is that it contains a number of misleading candidates for composition: "(das) Sollen, "(des) Sollens", "(die) Sau", "saus[e[n]]", "sagen". "Saussagen"? "Sollensaus"?

– Peter A. Schneider
2 days ago






One complication with this word is that it contains a number of misleading candidates for composition: "(das) Sollen, "(des) Sollens", "(die) Sau", "saus[e[n]]", "sagen". "Saussagen"? "Sollensaus"?

– Peter A. Schneider
2 days ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















18














In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental. Seinsaussagen are assertions about how the world is (to be is sein in German). Sollensaussagen are statements about how the world shall (shall or ought is sollen in German) be (in moral terms). The distinction is important, esp. for Kant, because it is impossible to infer Sollenssaussagen from Seinsaussagen. Such an inference is called Seins-Sollens-Fehlschluss (in english: is-ought-fallacy or is-ought-problem) or a violation of Hume's Law, after David Hume. This distinction of those two different kinds of assertions is very much part of the core of Kant's moral philosophy.



The english word for Sollenssaussage is moral judgement or normative statement and the english word for Seinsaussage is positive statement.



The given sentence




In den beiden Schriften untersucht Kant die Voraussetzungen und die Möglichkeit moralisch verbindlicher Sollensaussagen.




could be translated into




In both works, Kant is exploring the prerequisites and possibilities of morally binding statements about how the world shall be.




or into




In both works, Kant is exploring the prerequisites and possibilities of morally binding normative statements.







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Note: positive statements may also called empirical claims or empirical statements in English.

    – SeldomNeedy
    Apr 2 at 21:30











  • @SeldomNeedy First, I thought so, too. But I do not think, that empirical is strictly synonym to positive, because empirical is an epistemological category, i.e. it is saying about how a certain fact can be known (by perception), and positive is not necessarily an epistemological category: ...

    – jonathan.scholbach
    Apr 2 at 21:54











  • ... There might be positions which claim that there are positive statements whose logical value cannot be clarified by perception, so they are not empirical statements. They would, for instance say that the claim "God does not exist" is a positive statement (not a normative one), but it is not an empirical statement. That's the reason why I hesitate to say that positive statements may also be called empirical statements. But that is maybe too much philosophy for a platform which focusses on language, not on philosophy itself.

    – jonathan.scholbach
    Apr 2 at 21:54












  • "In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental." - interesting vocabulary observation: In engineering, essentially the very same concepts exist, but rather than "sein" and "sollen", the words used are "ist" and "soll".

    – O. R. Mapper
    11 hours ago


















8














German is full of noun compounds that are not listed in dictionaries. The meaning of such compounds is hopefully derivable from the meaning of the parts. Let's see whether it works in this case.




Sollen: (noun derived from the verb by conversion) roughly obligation, duty
Aussage: statement
Sollensaussage: statement about obligation or duty




Note: I wanted to show what I think is a sound strategy when encountering unfamiliar compounds. As Jonathan Scholbach's answer shows, technical terms often have a meaning that cannot be derived (although the derived meaning actually provides a solid basis for understanding the technical meaning in this case). A humorous example would be Spannung (suspense, excitement, tension), which in Physics means voltage. This is the reason why there are specialised dictionaries.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "253"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50453%2fwhats-the-meaning-of-sollensaussagen%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    18














    In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental. Seinsaussagen are assertions about how the world is (to be is sein in German). Sollensaussagen are statements about how the world shall (shall or ought is sollen in German) be (in moral terms). The distinction is important, esp. for Kant, because it is impossible to infer Sollenssaussagen from Seinsaussagen. Such an inference is called Seins-Sollens-Fehlschluss (in english: is-ought-fallacy or is-ought-problem) or a violation of Hume's Law, after David Hume. This distinction of those two different kinds of assertions is very much part of the core of Kant's moral philosophy.



    The english word for Sollenssaussage is moral judgement or normative statement and the english word for Seinsaussage is positive statement.



    The given sentence




    In den beiden Schriften untersucht Kant die Voraussetzungen und die Möglichkeit moralisch verbindlicher Sollensaussagen.




    could be translated into




    In both works, Kant is exploring the prerequisites and possibilities of morally binding statements about how the world shall be.




    or into




    In both works, Kant is exploring the prerequisites and possibilities of morally binding normative statements.







    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      Note: positive statements may also called empirical claims or empirical statements in English.

      – SeldomNeedy
      Apr 2 at 21:30











    • @SeldomNeedy First, I thought so, too. But I do not think, that empirical is strictly synonym to positive, because empirical is an epistemological category, i.e. it is saying about how a certain fact can be known (by perception), and positive is not necessarily an epistemological category: ...

      – jonathan.scholbach
      Apr 2 at 21:54











    • ... There might be positions which claim that there are positive statements whose logical value cannot be clarified by perception, so they are not empirical statements. They would, for instance say that the claim "God does not exist" is a positive statement (not a normative one), but it is not an empirical statement. That's the reason why I hesitate to say that positive statements may also be called empirical statements. But that is maybe too much philosophy for a platform which focusses on language, not on philosophy itself.

      – jonathan.scholbach
      Apr 2 at 21:54












    • "In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental." - interesting vocabulary observation: In engineering, essentially the very same concepts exist, but rather than "sein" and "sollen", the words used are "ist" and "soll".

      – O. R. Mapper
      11 hours ago















    18














    In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental. Seinsaussagen are assertions about how the world is (to be is sein in German). Sollensaussagen are statements about how the world shall (shall or ought is sollen in German) be (in moral terms). The distinction is important, esp. for Kant, because it is impossible to infer Sollenssaussagen from Seinsaussagen. Such an inference is called Seins-Sollens-Fehlschluss (in english: is-ought-fallacy or is-ought-problem) or a violation of Hume's Law, after David Hume. This distinction of those two different kinds of assertions is very much part of the core of Kant's moral philosophy.



    The english word for Sollenssaussage is moral judgement or normative statement and the english word for Seinsaussage is positive statement.



    The given sentence




    In den beiden Schriften untersucht Kant die Voraussetzungen und die Möglichkeit moralisch verbindlicher Sollensaussagen.




    could be translated into




    In both works, Kant is exploring the prerequisites and possibilities of morally binding statements about how the world shall be.




    or into




    In both works, Kant is exploring the prerequisites and possibilities of morally binding normative statements.







    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      Note: positive statements may also called empirical claims or empirical statements in English.

      – SeldomNeedy
      Apr 2 at 21:30











    • @SeldomNeedy First, I thought so, too. But I do not think, that empirical is strictly synonym to positive, because empirical is an epistemological category, i.e. it is saying about how a certain fact can be known (by perception), and positive is not necessarily an epistemological category: ...

      – jonathan.scholbach
      Apr 2 at 21:54











    • ... There might be positions which claim that there are positive statements whose logical value cannot be clarified by perception, so they are not empirical statements. They would, for instance say that the claim "God does not exist" is a positive statement (not a normative one), but it is not an empirical statement. That's the reason why I hesitate to say that positive statements may also be called empirical statements. But that is maybe too much philosophy for a platform which focusses on language, not on philosophy itself.

      – jonathan.scholbach
      Apr 2 at 21:54












    • "In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental." - interesting vocabulary observation: In engineering, essentially the very same concepts exist, but rather than "sein" and "sollen", the words used are "ist" and "soll".

      – O. R. Mapper
      11 hours ago













    18












    18








    18







    In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental. Seinsaussagen are assertions about how the world is (to be is sein in German). Sollensaussagen are statements about how the world shall (shall or ought is sollen in German) be (in moral terms). The distinction is important, esp. for Kant, because it is impossible to infer Sollenssaussagen from Seinsaussagen. Such an inference is called Seins-Sollens-Fehlschluss (in english: is-ought-fallacy or is-ought-problem) or a violation of Hume's Law, after David Hume. This distinction of those two different kinds of assertions is very much part of the core of Kant's moral philosophy.



    The english word for Sollenssaussage is moral judgement or normative statement and the english word for Seinsaussage is positive statement.



    The given sentence




    In den beiden Schriften untersucht Kant die Voraussetzungen und die Möglichkeit moralisch verbindlicher Sollensaussagen.




    could be translated into




    In both works, Kant is exploring the prerequisites and possibilities of morally binding statements about how the world shall be.




    or into




    In both works, Kant is exploring the prerequisites and possibilities of morally binding normative statements.







    share|improve this answer















    In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental. Seinsaussagen are assertions about how the world is (to be is sein in German). Sollensaussagen are statements about how the world shall (shall or ought is sollen in German) be (in moral terms). The distinction is important, esp. for Kant, because it is impossible to infer Sollenssaussagen from Seinsaussagen. Such an inference is called Seins-Sollens-Fehlschluss (in english: is-ought-fallacy or is-ought-problem) or a violation of Hume's Law, after David Hume. This distinction of those two different kinds of assertions is very much part of the core of Kant's moral philosophy.



    The english word for Sollenssaussage is moral judgement or normative statement and the english word for Seinsaussage is positive statement.



    The given sentence




    In den beiden Schriften untersucht Kant die Voraussetzungen und die Möglichkeit moralisch verbindlicher Sollensaussagen.




    could be translated into




    In both works, Kant is exploring the prerequisites and possibilities of morally binding statements about how the world shall be.




    or into




    In both works, Kant is exploring the prerequisites and possibilities of morally binding normative statements.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered Apr 2 at 19:02









    jonathan.scholbachjonathan.scholbach

    5,1351231




    5,1351231







    • 1





      Note: positive statements may also called empirical claims or empirical statements in English.

      – SeldomNeedy
      Apr 2 at 21:30











    • @SeldomNeedy First, I thought so, too. But I do not think, that empirical is strictly synonym to positive, because empirical is an epistemological category, i.e. it is saying about how a certain fact can be known (by perception), and positive is not necessarily an epistemological category: ...

      – jonathan.scholbach
      Apr 2 at 21:54











    • ... There might be positions which claim that there are positive statements whose logical value cannot be clarified by perception, so they are not empirical statements. They would, for instance say that the claim "God does not exist" is a positive statement (not a normative one), but it is not an empirical statement. That's the reason why I hesitate to say that positive statements may also be called empirical statements. But that is maybe too much philosophy for a platform which focusses on language, not on philosophy itself.

      – jonathan.scholbach
      Apr 2 at 21:54












    • "In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental." - interesting vocabulary observation: In engineering, essentially the very same concepts exist, but rather than "sein" and "sollen", the words used are "ist" and "soll".

      – O. R. Mapper
      11 hours ago












    • 1





      Note: positive statements may also called empirical claims or empirical statements in English.

      – SeldomNeedy
      Apr 2 at 21:30











    • @SeldomNeedy First, I thought so, too. But I do not think, that empirical is strictly synonym to positive, because empirical is an epistemological category, i.e. it is saying about how a certain fact can be known (by perception), and positive is not necessarily an epistemological category: ...

      – jonathan.scholbach
      Apr 2 at 21:54











    • ... There might be positions which claim that there are positive statements whose logical value cannot be clarified by perception, so they are not empirical statements. They would, for instance say that the claim "God does not exist" is a positive statement (not a normative one), but it is not an empirical statement. That's the reason why I hesitate to say that positive statements may also be called empirical statements. But that is maybe too much philosophy for a platform which focusses on language, not on philosophy itself.

      – jonathan.scholbach
      Apr 2 at 21:54












    • "In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental." - interesting vocabulary observation: In engineering, essentially the very same concepts exist, but rather than "sein" and "sollen", the words used are "ist" and "soll".

      – O. R. Mapper
      11 hours ago







    1




    1





    Note: positive statements may also called empirical claims or empirical statements in English.

    – SeldomNeedy
    Apr 2 at 21:30





    Note: positive statements may also called empirical claims or empirical statements in English.

    – SeldomNeedy
    Apr 2 at 21:30













    @SeldomNeedy First, I thought so, too. But I do not think, that empirical is strictly synonym to positive, because empirical is an epistemological category, i.e. it is saying about how a certain fact can be known (by perception), and positive is not necessarily an epistemological category: ...

    – jonathan.scholbach
    Apr 2 at 21:54





    @SeldomNeedy First, I thought so, too. But I do not think, that empirical is strictly synonym to positive, because empirical is an epistemological category, i.e. it is saying about how a certain fact can be known (by perception), and positive is not necessarily an epistemological category: ...

    – jonathan.scholbach
    Apr 2 at 21:54













    ... There might be positions which claim that there are positive statements whose logical value cannot be clarified by perception, so they are not empirical statements. They would, for instance say that the claim "God does not exist" is a positive statement (not a normative one), but it is not an empirical statement. That's the reason why I hesitate to say that positive statements may also be called empirical statements. But that is maybe too much philosophy for a platform which focusses on language, not on philosophy itself.

    – jonathan.scholbach
    Apr 2 at 21:54






    ... There might be positions which claim that there are positive statements whose logical value cannot be clarified by perception, so they are not empirical statements. They would, for instance say that the claim "God does not exist" is a positive statement (not a normative one), but it is not an empirical statement. That's the reason why I hesitate to say that positive statements may also be called empirical statements. But that is maybe too much philosophy for a platform which focusses on language, not on philosophy itself.

    – jonathan.scholbach
    Apr 2 at 21:54














    "In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental." - interesting vocabulary observation: In engineering, essentially the very same concepts exist, but rather than "sein" and "sollen", the words used are "ist" and "soll".

    – O. R. Mapper
    11 hours ago





    "In philosophy, esp. in moral philosophy, the distinction between Seinsaussagen and Sollensaussagen is fundamental." - interesting vocabulary observation: In engineering, essentially the very same concepts exist, but rather than "sein" and "sollen", the words used are "ist" and "soll".

    – O. R. Mapper
    11 hours ago











    8














    German is full of noun compounds that are not listed in dictionaries. The meaning of such compounds is hopefully derivable from the meaning of the parts. Let's see whether it works in this case.




    Sollen: (noun derived from the verb by conversion) roughly obligation, duty
    Aussage: statement
    Sollensaussage: statement about obligation or duty




    Note: I wanted to show what I think is a sound strategy when encountering unfamiliar compounds. As Jonathan Scholbach's answer shows, technical terms often have a meaning that cannot be derived (although the derived meaning actually provides a solid basis for understanding the technical meaning in this case). A humorous example would be Spannung (suspense, excitement, tension), which in Physics means voltage. This is the reason why there are specialised dictionaries.






    share|improve this answer





























      8














      German is full of noun compounds that are not listed in dictionaries. The meaning of such compounds is hopefully derivable from the meaning of the parts. Let's see whether it works in this case.




      Sollen: (noun derived from the verb by conversion) roughly obligation, duty
      Aussage: statement
      Sollensaussage: statement about obligation or duty




      Note: I wanted to show what I think is a sound strategy when encountering unfamiliar compounds. As Jonathan Scholbach's answer shows, technical terms often have a meaning that cannot be derived (although the derived meaning actually provides a solid basis for understanding the technical meaning in this case). A humorous example would be Spannung (suspense, excitement, tension), which in Physics means voltage. This is the reason why there are specialised dictionaries.






      share|improve this answer



























        8












        8








        8







        German is full of noun compounds that are not listed in dictionaries. The meaning of such compounds is hopefully derivable from the meaning of the parts. Let's see whether it works in this case.




        Sollen: (noun derived from the verb by conversion) roughly obligation, duty
        Aussage: statement
        Sollensaussage: statement about obligation or duty




        Note: I wanted to show what I think is a sound strategy when encountering unfamiliar compounds. As Jonathan Scholbach's answer shows, technical terms often have a meaning that cannot be derived (although the derived meaning actually provides a solid basis for understanding the technical meaning in this case). A humorous example would be Spannung (suspense, excitement, tension), which in Physics means voltage. This is the reason why there are specialised dictionaries.






        share|improve this answer















        German is full of noun compounds that are not listed in dictionaries. The meaning of such compounds is hopefully derivable from the meaning of the parts. Let's see whether it works in this case.




        Sollen: (noun derived from the verb by conversion) roughly obligation, duty
        Aussage: statement
        Sollensaussage: statement about obligation or duty




        Note: I wanted to show what I think is a sound strategy when encountering unfamiliar compounds. As Jonathan Scholbach's answer shows, technical terms often have a meaning that cannot be derived (although the derived meaning actually provides a solid basis for understanding the technical meaning in this case). A humorous example would be Spannung (suspense, excitement, tension), which in Physics means voltage. This is the reason why there are specialised dictionaries.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 2 at 19:28

























        answered Apr 2 at 18:40









        David VogtDavid Vogt

        4,6451330




        4,6451330



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to German Language Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50453%2fwhats-the-meaning-of-sollensaussagen%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to write a 12-bar blues melodyI-IV-V blues progressionHow to play the bridges in a standard blues progressionHow does Gdim7 fit in C# minor?question on a certain chord progressionMusicology of Melody12 bar blues, spread rhythm: alternative to 6th chord to avoid finger stretchChord progressions/ Root key/ MelodiesHow to put chords (POP-EDM) under a given lead vocal melody (starting from a good knowledge in music theory)Are there “rules” for improvising with the minor pentatonic scale over 12-bar shuffle?Confusion about blues scale and chords

            What if the end-user didn't have the required library?What is setup.py?What is a clean, pythonic way to have multiple constructors in Python?What does Ruby have that Python doesn't, and vice versa?What is the reason for having '//' in Python?How do I create a namespace package in Python?How to package shared objects that python modules depend on?setuptools vs. distutils: why is distutils still a thing?Navigation in Windows 10 vs code not going to virtualenv library when the same library is installed at user levelPython create package for local usePackaging a project that uses multiple python versionsWhy is permission denied on pip install except for when “--user” is included at end of command?

            Why did Thanos need his ship to help him in the battle scene?Which actor plays Thanos in the Avengers mid-credits scene?Are there economic implications portrayed in comics where the buildings and cities are ruined almost daily?Old X-Men comic where team travels to alien world with a ring-like sun that needs recharging?Why does Ego need help sleeping?Is there an objective answer to who “the strongest Avenger” is?How did Banner get unstuck?Why did Thanos get hit?How did Thanos (or anyone) know the Infinity Stones would give him this power?Did Thanos leave Eitri alive for his after-sales service?In Avengers 1, why does Thanos need Loki?