Can full drive backup be used instead of MSSQL database backup?Way to make differential backup from full different but from same databaseSafest way to uninstall the previous SQL Server versionsSQL Server restore differential after restoring full backupSQL Server Database Migration - Backup/Restore while Original DB still in ProductionExclude databases from automatic full backupRestoring Database, creating new copy and use existing transaction logs for the original backup database to restore the NEW database to be current?NT SERVICEMSSQL$SQLEXPRESS user cannot be found when added to network driveDo I need to back up the log file drive when using VSS snapshots in simple mode?get stuck trying to copy or backup database in microsoft SQL serverI can not Ola Hallengren database backup script to Data Domain make works
Why would company (decision makers) wait for someone to retire, rather than lay them off, when their role is no longer needed?
Getting a similar picture (colours) on Manual Mode while using similar Auto Mode settings (T6 and 40D)
What do you call the hair or body hair you trim off your body?
Will there be more tax deductions if I put the house completely under my name, versus doing a joint ownership?
How did the horses get to space?
What do the "optional" resistor and capacitor do in this circuit?
tikzcd diagram within an array
Holding rent money for my friend which amounts to over $10k?
Is there any deeper thematic meaning to the white horse that Arya finds in The Bells (S08E05)?
Should I communicate in my applications that I'm unemployed out of choice rather than because nobody will have me?
Break long word (not long text!) in longtable cell
Given 0s on Assignments with suspected and dismissed cheating?
What dog breeds survive the apocalypse for generations?
How does Ctrl+c and Ctrl+v work?
Is random forest for regression a 'true' regression?
Why did Varys remove his rings?
Computing a series sum
Formal Definition of Dot Product
How to continually let my readers know what time it is in my story, in an organic way?
tikz drawing rectangle discretized with triangle lattices and its centroids
Assembly writer vs compiler in VLIW architecture
Do high-wing aircraft represent more difficult engineering challenges than low-wing aircraft?
1970s short story about a famous hunter who is cloned and will die after three days?
Cuban Primes
Can full drive backup be used instead of MSSQL database backup?
Way to make differential backup from full different but from same databaseSafest way to uninstall the previous SQL Server versionsSQL Server restore differential after restoring full backupSQL Server Database Migration - Backup/Restore while Original DB still in ProductionExclude databases from automatic full backupRestoring Database, creating new copy and use existing transaction logs for the original backup database to restore the NEW database to be current?NT SERVICEMSSQL$SQLEXPRESS user cannot be found when added to network driveDo I need to back up the log file drive when using VSS snapshots in simple mode?get stuck trying to copy or backup database in microsoft SQL serverI can not Ola Hallengren database backup script to Data Domain make works
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I have a MSSQL Express server running on a VM. Hosting provider I use has an option to create drive snapshots. The server is running all the time and is not stopped during the drive backup. Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL. If I keep my data files on such drive and use snapshots in case of disaster recovery, are there any risks that database may not be restored?
sql-server backup
add a comment |
I have a MSSQL Express server running on a VM. Hosting provider I use has an option to create drive snapshots. The server is running all the time and is not stopped during the drive backup. Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL. If I keep my data files on such drive and use snapshots in case of disaster recovery, are there any risks that database may not be restored?
sql-server backup
2
Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?
– Michael Kutz
May 4 at 10:28
3
@Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.
– Justinas Simanavicius
May 4 at 10:39
A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.
– eckes
May 5 at 12:36
add a comment |
I have a MSSQL Express server running on a VM. Hosting provider I use has an option to create drive snapshots. The server is running all the time and is not stopped during the drive backup. Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL. If I keep my data files on such drive and use snapshots in case of disaster recovery, are there any risks that database may not be restored?
sql-server backup
I have a MSSQL Express server running on a VM. Hosting provider I use has an option to create drive snapshots. The server is running all the time and is not stopped during the drive backup. Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL. If I keep my data files on such drive and use snapshots in case of disaster recovery, are there any risks that database may not be restored?
sql-server backup
sql-server backup
edited May 4 at 10:37
Justinas Simanavicius
asked May 4 at 10:23
Justinas SimanaviciusJustinas Simanavicius
384
384
2
Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?
– Michael Kutz
May 4 at 10:28
3
@Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.
– Justinas Simanavicius
May 4 at 10:39
A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.
– eckes
May 5 at 12:36
add a comment |
2
Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?
– Michael Kutz
May 4 at 10:28
3
@Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.
– Justinas Simanavicius
May 4 at 10:39
A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.
– eckes
May 5 at 12:36
2
2
Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?
– Michael Kutz
May 4 at 10:28
Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?
– Michael Kutz
May 4 at 10:28
3
3
@Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.
– Justinas Simanavicius
May 4 at 10:39
@Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.
– Justinas Simanavicius
May 4 at 10:39
A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.
– eckes
May 5 at 12:36
A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.
– eckes
May 5 at 12:36
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL.
Typically server backup programs will coordinate with SQL Server through the Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) to ensure that SQL Server places the database files in a consistent state before volume snapshots are taken. At a minimum backup programs should create backups that are consistent on a per-volume basis.
However, even in an enterprise environment where you have trusted professionals performing server backups using a configuration you can verify, very few DBAs would actually rely on server backups. Remember backups alone are irrelevant. Restores are what you actually care about.
So how are you going to perform a restore if you rely on server backups? Not easily, that's for sure.
So take backups. Then download them regularly from your hoster, or upload them to a cloud storage provider, eg:
- Sign up for an Azure account
- Provision a storage account (LRS + Cool default tier)
- Use SQL Server's Backup to URL feature to take database backups directly to your storage account.
add a comment |
While you should certainly take note of the points that David Browne makes I have used the drive snapshot approach for backups and have successfully restored small SQL databases from them. But see the caveats at the end of my answer - I would be very wary of attempting this on a large database.
Most backup software of this type will allow you to mount the backup as a virtual drive. Once mounted you can just copy back the MDF file. You can either simply stop the SQL server service, replace the original file(s) then restart it, or attach the MDF file as a new database and copy back selected data from it.
But:
I have only ever used this for small databases set to simple logging. In this context small would mean the sort of size SQLExpress supports so this would apply to your system. When I'm using this sort of backup I use simple logging because the backup software we use takes a snapshot every 15 minutes so it gives me a pretty good granularity without needing full logging.
I use this approach mainly for the sort of small SQL databases used by apps. Lots of end user apps use SQLExpress as their data store these days, just as some years ago lots of apps used Access MDB files, and in these circumstances I tend to view the database in the same way I'd view any other data file. You don't say what your database is used for so I can't advise you on how well this would work for you. The usual advice for backups applies: test your backups regularly to make sure you can restore from them.
We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.
– Ben
May 5 at 11:52
add a comment |
I agree with all the points mentioned above by David Browne and would like to add one more pertinent point here. Since you have not specified recovery model of database, I assume that it is Full recovery mode. Which means with each transaction log size will keep on growing until it occupies the whole disk(unless you have capped the size of Log auto increment).
Once you take log backup, following happens:
A transaction log backup allows you to backup the active part of the
transaction log. So after you issue a "Full" or "Differential" backup
the transaction log backup will have any transactions that were
created after those other backups completed. After the transaction
log backup is issued, the space within the transaction log can be
reused for other processes. If a transaction log backup is not taken,
the transaction log will continue to grow.
Taking snapshot of disk will never clear the log inside the SQL server and moreover, you also have feature of compressed backup, which can be useful for keeping the size of backup really small. In case of disaster, using Full, differential and log backup you can achieve point in time recovery.
One more thing to add here - Generally DBAs keep backup on different storage and not on the same storage where Data or log file resides. So, in case your disk of data or log file crashes, you are still safe because you have backups available on some other storage.
I hope above helps.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f237375%2fcan-full-drive-backup-be-used-instead-of-mssql-database-backup%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL.
Typically server backup programs will coordinate with SQL Server through the Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) to ensure that SQL Server places the database files in a consistent state before volume snapshots are taken. At a minimum backup programs should create backups that are consistent on a per-volume basis.
However, even in an enterprise environment where you have trusted professionals performing server backups using a configuration you can verify, very few DBAs would actually rely on server backups. Remember backups alone are irrelevant. Restores are what you actually care about.
So how are you going to perform a restore if you rely on server backups? Not easily, that's for sure.
So take backups. Then download them regularly from your hoster, or upload them to a cloud storage provider, eg:
- Sign up for an Azure account
- Provision a storage account (LRS + Cool default tier)
- Use SQL Server's Backup to URL feature to take database backups directly to your storage account.
add a comment |
Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL.
Typically server backup programs will coordinate with SQL Server through the Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) to ensure that SQL Server places the database files in a consistent state before volume snapshots are taken. At a minimum backup programs should create backups that are consistent on a per-volume basis.
However, even in an enterprise environment where you have trusted professionals performing server backups using a configuration you can verify, very few DBAs would actually rely on server backups. Remember backups alone are irrelevant. Restores are what you actually care about.
So how are you going to perform a restore if you rely on server backups? Not easily, that's for sure.
So take backups. Then download them regularly from your hoster, or upload them to a cloud storage provider, eg:
- Sign up for an Azure account
- Provision a storage account (LRS + Cool default tier)
- Use SQL Server's Backup to URL feature to take database backups directly to your storage account.
add a comment |
Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL.
Typically server backup programs will coordinate with SQL Server through the Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) to ensure that SQL Server places the database files in a consistent state before volume snapshots are taken. At a minimum backup programs should create backups that are consistent on a per-volume basis.
However, even in an enterprise environment where you have trusted professionals performing server backups using a configuration you can verify, very few DBAs would actually rely on server backups. Remember backups alone are irrelevant. Restores are what you actually care about.
So how are you going to perform a restore if you rely on server backups? Not easily, that's for sure.
So take backups. Then download them regularly from your hoster, or upload them to a cloud storage provider, eg:
- Sign up for an Azure account
- Provision a storage account (LRS + Cool default tier)
- Use SQL Server's Backup to URL feature to take database backups directly to your storage account.
Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL.
Typically server backup programs will coordinate with SQL Server through the Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) to ensure that SQL Server places the database files in a consistent state before volume snapshots are taken. At a minimum backup programs should create backups that are consistent on a per-volume basis.
However, even in an enterprise environment where you have trusted professionals performing server backups using a configuration you can verify, very few DBAs would actually rely on server backups. Remember backups alone are irrelevant. Restores are what you actually care about.
So how are you going to perform a restore if you rely on server backups? Not easily, that's for sure.
So take backups. Then download them regularly from your hoster, or upload them to a cloud storage provider, eg:
- Sign up for an Azure account
- Provision a storage account (LRS + Cool default tier)
- Use SQL Server's Backup to URL feature to take database backups directly to your storage account.
edited May 5 at 13:40
answered May 4 at 12:58
David Browne - MicrosoftDavid Browne - Microsoft
13.3k937
13.3k937
add a comment |
add a comment |
While you should certainly take note of the points that David Browne makes I have used the drive snapshot approach for backups and have successfully restored small SQL databases from them. But see the caveats at the end of my answer - I would be very wary of attempting this on a large database.
Most backup software of this type will allow you to mount the backup as a virtual drive. Once mounted you can just copy back the MDF file. You can either simply stop the SQL server service, replace the original file(s) then restart it, or attach the MDF file as a new database and copy back selected data from it.
But:
I have only ever used this for small databases set to simple logging. In this context small would mean the sort of size SQLExpress supports so this would apply to your system. When I'm using this sort of backup I use simple logging because the backup software we use takes a snapshot every 15 minutes so it gives me a pretty good granularity without needing full logging.
I use this approach mainly for the sort of small SQL databases used by apps. Lots of end user apps use SQLExpress as their data store these days, just as some years ago lots of apps used Access MDB files, and in these circumstances I tend to view the database in the same way I'd view any other data file. You don't say what your database is used for so I can't advise you on how well this would work for you. The usual advice for backups applies: test your backups regularly to make sure you can restore from them.
We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.
– Ben
May 5 at 11:52
add a comment |
While you should certainly take note of the points that David Browne makes I have used the drive snapshot approach for backups and have successfully restored small SQL databases from them. But see the caveats at the end of my answer - I would be very wary of attempting this on a large database.
Most backup software of this type will allow you to mount the backup as a virtual drive. Once mounted you can just copy back the MDF file. You can either simply stop the SQL server service, replace the original file(s) then restart it, or attach the MDF file as a new database and copy back selected data from it.
But:
I have only ever used this for small databases set to simple logging. In this context small would mean the sort of size SQLExpress supports so this would apply to your system. When I'm using this sort of backup I use simple logging because the backup software we use takes a snapshot every 15 minutes so it gives me a pretty good granularity without needing full logging.
I use this approach mainly for the sort of small SQL databases used by apps. Lots of end user apps use SQLExpress as their data store these days, just as some years ago lots of apps used Access MDB files, and in these circumstances I tend to view the database in the same way I'd view any other data file. You don't say what your database is used for so I can't advise you on how well this would work for you. The usual advice for backups applies: test your backups regularly to make sure you can restore from them.
We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.
– Ben
May 5 at 11:52
add a comment |
While you should certainly take note of the points that David Browne makes I have used the drive snapshot approach for backups and have successfully restored small SQL databases from them. But see the caveats at the end of my answer - I would be very wary of attempting this on a large database.
Most backup software of this type will allow you to mount the backup as a virtual drive. Once mounted you can just copy back the MDF file. You can either simply stop the SQL server service, replace the original file(s) then restart it, or attach the MDF file as a new database and copy back selected data from it.
But:
I have only ever used this for small databases set to simple logging. In this context small would mean the sort of size SQLExpress supports so this would apply to your system. When I'm using this sort of backup I use simple logging because the backup software we use takes a snapshot every 15 minutes so it gives me a pretty good granularity without needing full logging.
I use this approach mainly for the sort of small SQL databases used by apps. Lots of end user apps use SQLExpress as their data store these days, just as some years ago lots of apps used Access MDB files, and in these circumstances I tend to view the database in the same way I'd view any other data file. You don't say what your database is used for so I can't advise you on how well this would work for you. The usual advice for backups applies: test your backups regularly to make sure you can restore from them.
While you should certainly take note of the points that David Browne makes I have used the drive snapshot approach for backups and have successfully restored small SQL databases from them. But see the caveats at the end of my answer - I would be very wary of attempting this on a large database.
Most backup software of this type will allow you to mount the backup as a virtual drive. Once mounted you can just copy back the MDF file. You can either simply stop the SQL server service, replace the original file(s) then restart it, or attach the MDF file as a new database and copy back selected data from it.
But:
I have only ever used this for small databases set to simple logging. In this context small would mean the sort of size SQLExpress supports so this would apply to your system. When I'm using this sort of backup I use simple logging because the backup software we use takes a snapshot every 15 minutes so it gives me a pretty good granularity without needing full logging.
I use this approach mainly for the sort of small SQL databases used by apps. Lots of end user apps use SQLExpress as their data store these days, just as some years ago lots of apps used Access MDB files, and in these circumstances I tend to view the database in the same way I'd view any other data file. You don't say what your database is used for so I can't advise you on how well this would work for you. The usual advice for backups applies: test your backups regularly to make sure you can restore from them.
answered May 5 at 6:08
John RennieJohn Rennie
1334
1334
We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.
– Ben
May 5 at 11:52
add a comment |
We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.
– Ben
May 5 at 11:52
We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.
– Ben
May 5 at 11:52
We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.
– Ben
May 5 at 11:52
add a comment |
I agree with all the points mentioned above by David Browne and would like to add one more pertinent point here. Since you have not specified recovery model of database, I assume that it is Full recovery mode. Which means with each transaction log size will keep on growing until it occupies the whole disk(unless you have capped the size of Log auto increment).
Once you take log backup, following happens:
A transaction log backup allows you to backup the active part of the
transaction log. So after you issue a "Full" or "Differential" backup
the transaction log backup will have any transactions that were
created after those other backups completed. After the transaction
log backup is issued, the space within the transaction log can be
reused for other processes. If a transaction log backup is not taken,
the transaction log will continue to grow.
Taking snapshot of disk will never clear the log inside the SQL server and moreover, you also have feature of compressed backup, which can be useful for keeping the size of backup really small. In case of disaster, using Full, differential and log backup you can achieve point in time recovery.
One more thing to add here - Generally DBAs keep backup on different storage and not on the same storage where Data or log file resides. So, in case your disk of data or log file crashes, you are still safe because you have backups available on some other storage.
I hope above helps.
add a comment |
I agree with all the points mentioned above by David Browne and would like to add one more pertinent point here. Since you have not specified recovery model of database, I assume that it is Full recovery mode. Which means with each transaction log size will keep on growing until it occupies the whole disk(unless you have capped the size of Log auto increment).
Once you take log backup, following happens:
A transaction log backup allows you to backup the active part of the
transaction log. So after you issue a "Full" or "Differential" backup
the transaction log backup will have any transactions that were
created after those other backups completed. After the transaction
log backup is issued, the space within the transaction log can be
reused for other processes. If a transaction log backup is not taken,
the transaction log will continue to grow.
Taking snapshot of disk will never clear the log inside the SQL server and moreover, you also have feature of compressed backup, which can be useful for keeping the size of backup really small. In case of disaster, using Full, differential and log backup you can achieve point in time recovery.
One more thing to add here - Generally DBAs keep backup on different storage and not on the same storage where Data or log file resides. So, in case your disk of data or log file crashes, you are still safe because you have backups available on some other storage.
I hope above helps.
add a comment |
I agree with all the points mentioned above by David Browne and would like to add one more pertinent point here. Since you have not specified recovery model of database, I assume that it is Full recovery mode. Which means with each transaction log size will keep on growing until it occupies the whole disk(unless you have capped the size of Log auto increment).
Once you take log backup, following happens:
A transaction log backup allows you to backup the active part of the
transaction log. So after you issue a "Full" or "Differential" backup
the transaction log backup will have any transactions that were
created after those other backups completed. After the transaction
log backup is issued, the space within the transaction log can be
reused for other processes. If a transaction log backup is not taken,
the transaction log will continue to grow.
Taking snapshot of disk will never clear the log inside the SQL server and moreover, you also have feature of compressed backup, which can be useful for keeping the size of backup really small. In case of disaster, using Full, differential and log backup you can achieve point in time recovery.
One more thing to add here - Generally DBAs keep backup on different storage and not on the same storage where Data or log file resides. So, in case your disk of data or log file crashes, you are still safe because you have backups available on some other storage.
I hope above helps.
I agree with all the points mentioned above by David Browne and would like to add one more pertinent point here. Since you have not specified recovery model of database, I assume that it is Full recovery mode. Which means with each transaction log size will keep on growing until it occupies the whole disk(unless you have capped the size of Log auto increment).
Once you take log backup, following happens:
A transaction log backup allows you to backup the active part of the
transaction log. So after you issue a "Full" or "Differential" backup
the transaction log backup will have any transactions that were
created after those other backups completed. After the transaction
log backup is issued, the space within the transaction log can be
reused for other processes. If a transaction log backup is not taken,
the transaction log will continue to grow.
Taking snapshot of disk will never clear the log inside the SQL server and moreover, you also have feature of compressed backup, which can be useful for keeping the size of backup really small. In case of disaster, using Full, differential and log backup you can achieve point in time recovery.
One more thing to add here - Generally DBAs keep backup on different storage and not on the same storage where Data or log file resides. So, in case your disk of data or log file crashes, you are still safe because you have backups available on some other storage.
I hope above helps.
answered May 5 at 5:06
Learning_DBAdminLearning_DBAdmin
1,028219
1,028219
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f237375%2fcan-full-drive-backup-be-used-instead-of-mssql-database-backup%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?
– Michael Kutz
May 4 at 10:28
3
@Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.
– Justinas Simanavicius
May 4 at 10:39
A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.
– eckes
May 5 at 12:36