Can full drive backup be used instead of MSSQL database backup?Way to make differential backup from full different but from same databaseSafest way to uninstall the previous SQL Server versionsSQL Server restore differential after restoring full backupSQL Server Database Migration - Backup/Restore while Original DB still in ProductionExclude databases from automatic full backupRestoring Database, creating new copy and use existing transaction logs for the original backup database to restore the NEW database to be current?NT SERVICEMSSQL$SQLEXPRESS user cannot be found when added to network driveDo I need to back up the log file drive when using VSS snapshots in simple mode?get stuck trying to copy or backup database in microsoft SQL serverI can not Ola Hallengren database backup script to Data Domain make works

Why would company (decision makers) wait for someone to retire, rather than lay them off, when their role is no longer needed?

Getting a similar picture (colours) on Manual Mode while using similar Auto Mode settings (T6 and 40D)

What do you call the hair or body hair you trim off your body?

Will there be more tax deductions if I put the house completely under my name, versus doing a joint ownership?

How did the horses get to space?

What do the "optional" resistor and capacitor do in this circuit?

tikzcd diagram within an array

Holding rent money for my friend which amounts to over $10k?

Is there any deeper thematic meaning to the white horse that Arya finds in The Bells (S08E05)?

Should I communicate in my applications that I'm unemployed out of choice rather than because nobody will have me?

Break long word (not long text!) in longtable cell

Given 0s on Assignments with suspected and dismissed cheating?

What dog breeds survive the apocalypse for generations?

How does Ctrl+c and Ctrl+v work?

Is random forest for regression a 'true' regression?

Why did Varys remove his rings?

Computing a series sum

Formal Definition of Dot Product

How to continually let my readers know what time it is in my story, in an organic way?

tikz drawing rectangle discretized with triangle lattices and its centroids

Assembly writer vs compiler in VLIW architecture

Do high-wing aircraft represent more difficult engineering challenges than low-wing aircraft?

1970s short story about a famous hunter who is cloned and will die after three days?

​Cuban​ ​Primes



Can full drive backup be used instead of MSSQL database backup?


Way to make differential backup from full different but from same databaseSafest way to uninstall the previous SQL Server versionsSQL Server restore differential after restoring full backupSQL Server Database Migration - Backup/Restore while Original DB still in ProductionExclude databases from automatic full backupRestoring Database, creating new copy and use existing transaction logs for the original backup database to restore the NEW database to be current?NT SERVICEMSSQL$SQLEXPRESS user cannot be found when added to network driveDo I need to back up the log file drive when using VSS snapshots in simple mode?get stuck trying to copy or backup database in microsoft SQL serverI can not Ola Hallengren database backup script to Data Domain make works






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7















I have a MSSQL Express server running on a VM. Hosting provider I use has an option to create drive snapshots. The server is running all the time and is not stopped during the drive backup. Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL. If I keep my data files on such drive and use snapshots in case of disaster recovery, are there any risks that database may not be restored?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?

    – Michael Kutz
    May 4 at 10:28






  • 3





    @Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.

    – Justinas Simanavicius
    May 4 at 10:39











  • A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.

    – eckes
    May 5 at 12:36

















7















I have a MSSQL Express server running on a VM. Hosting provider I use has an option to create drive snapshots. The server is running all the time and is not stopped during the drive backup. Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL. If I keep my data files on such drive and use snapshots in case of disaster recovery, are there any risks that database may not be restored?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?

    – Michael Kutz
    May 4 at 10:28






  • 3





    @Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.

    – Justinas Simanavicius
    May 4 at 10:39











  • A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.

    – eckes
    May 5 at 12:36













7












7








7


2






I have a MSSQL Express server running on a VM. Hosting provider I use has an option to create drive snapshots. The server is running all the time and is not stopped during the drive backup. Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL. If I keep my data files on such drive and use snapshots in case of disaster recovery, are there any risks that database may not be restored?










share|improve this question
















I have a MSSQL Express server running on a VM. Hosting provider I use has an option to create drive snapshots. The server is running all the time and is not stopped during the drive backup. Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL. If I keep my data files on such drive and use snapshots in case of disaster recovery, are there any risks that database may not be restored?







sql-server backup






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 4 at 10:37







Justinas Simanavicius

















asked May 4 at 10:23









Justinas SimanaviciusJustinas Simanavicius

384




384







  • 2





    Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?

    – Michael Kutz
    May 4 at 10:28






  • 3





    @Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.

    – Justinas Simanavicius
    May 4 at 10:39











  • A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.

    – eckes
    May 5 at 12:36












  • 2





    Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?

    – Michael Kutz
    May 4 at 10:28






  • 3





    @Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.

    – Justinas Simanavicius
    May 4 at 10:39











  • A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.

    – eckes
    May 5 at 12:36







2




2





Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?

– Michael Kutz
May 4 at 10:28





Did you flush and pause all I/O buffers first?

– Michael Kutz
May 4 at 10:28




3




3





@Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.

– Justinas Simanavicius
May 4 at 10:39





@Vérace given that server is running, I assume it's not safe to rely on drive backups, and regular DB backups should be used instead.

– Justinas Simanavicius
May 4 at 10:39













A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.

– eckes
May 5 at 12:36





A drive snapshot basically has the same consistency model as a crash recovery and data storage software should be able to recover from crashes. It might require crash recovery but it will be able (absent of bugs) to be restored to this snapshot time.

– eckes
May 5 at 12:36










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















11















Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL.




Typically server backup programs will coordinate with SQL Server through the Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) to ensure that SQL Server places the database files in a consistent state before volume snapshots are taken. At a minimum backup programs should create backups that are consistent on a per-volume basis.



However, even in an enterprise environment where you have trusted professionals performing server backups using a configuration you can verify, very few DBAs would actually rely on server backups. Remember backups alone are irrelevant. Restores are what you actually care about.



So how are you going to perform a restore if you rely on server backups? Not easily, that's for sure.



So take backups. Then download them regularly from your hoster, or upload them to a cloud storage provider, eg:



  • Sign up for an Azure account

  • Provision a storage account (LRS + Cool default tier)

  • Use SQL Server's Backup to URL feature to take database backups directly to your storage account.





share|improve this answer
































    3














    While you should certainly take note of the points that David Browne makes I have used the drive snapshot approach for backups and have successfully restored small SQL databases from them. But see the caveats at the end of my answer - I would be very wary of attempting this on a large database.



    Most backup software of this type will allow you to mount the backup as a virtual drive. Once mounted you can just copy back the MDF file. You can either simply stop the SQL server service, replace the original file(s) then restart it, or attach the MDF file as a new database and copy back selected data from it.



    But:



    I have only ever used this for small databases set to simple logging. In this context small would mean the sort of size SQLExpress supports so this would apply to your system. When I'm using this sort of backup I use simple logging because the backup software we use takes a snapshot every 15 minutes so it gives me a pretty good granularity without needing full logging.



    I use this approach mainly for the sort of small SQL databases used by apps. Lots of end user apps use SQLExpress as their data store these days, just as some years ago lots of apps used Access MDB files, and in these circumstances I tend to view the database in the same way I'd view any other data file. You don't say what your database is used for so I can't advise you on how well this would work for you. The usual advice for backups applies: test your backups regularly to make sure you can restore from them.






    share|improve this answer























    • We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.

      – Ben
      May 5 at 11:52



















    2














    I agree with all the points mentioned above by David Browne and would like to add one more pertinent point here. Since you have not specified recovery model of database, I assume that it is Full recovery mode. Which means with each transaction log size will keep on growing until it occupies the whole disk(unless you have capped the size of Log auto increment).



    Once you take log backup, following happens:




    A transaction log backup allows you to backup the active part of the
    transaction log. So after you issue a "Full" or "Differential" backup
    the transaction log backup will have any transactions that were
    created after those other backups completed. After the transaction
    log backup is issued, the space within the transaction log can be
    reused for other processes. If a transaction log backup is not taken,
    the transaction log will continue to grow.




    Taking snapshot of disk will never clear the log inside the SQL server and moreover, you also have feature of compressed backup, which can be useful for keeping the size of backup really small. In case of disaster, using Full, differential and log backup you can achieve point in time recovery.



    One more thing to add here - Generally DBAs keep backup on different storage and not on the same storage where Data or log file resides. So, in case your disk of data or log file crashes, you are still safe because you have backups available on some other storage.



    I hope above helps.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "182"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f237375%2fcan-full-drive-backup-be-used-instead-of-mssql-database-backup%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      11















      Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL.




      Typically server backup programs will coordinate with SQL Server through the Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) to ensure that SQL Server places the database files in a consistent state before volume snapshots are taken. At a minimum backup programs should create backups that are consistent on a per-volume basis.



      However, even in an enterprise environment where you have trusted professionals performing server backups using a configuration you can verify, very few DBAs would actually rely on server backups. Remember backups alone are irrelevant. Restores are what you actually care about.



      So how are you going to perform a restore if you rely on server backups? Not easily, that's for sure.



      So take backups. Then download them regularly from your hoster, or upload them to a cloud storage provider, eg:



      • Sign up for an Azure account

      • Provision a storage account (LRS + Cool default tier)

      • Use SQL Server's Backup to URL feature to take database backups directly to your storage account.





      share|improve this answer





























        11















        Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL.




        Typically server backup programs will coordinate with SQL Server through the Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) to ensure that SQL Server places the database files in a consistent state before volume snapshots are taken. At a minimum backup programs should create backups that are consistent on a per-volume basis.



        However, even in an enterprise environment where you have trusted professionals performing server backups using a configuration you can verify, very few DBAs would actually rely on server backups. Remember backups alone are irrelevant. Restores are what you actually care about.



        So how are you going to perform a restore if you rely on server backups? Not easily, that's for sure.



        So take backups. Then download them regularly from your hoster, or upload them to a cloud storage provider, eg:



        • Sign up for an Azure account

        • Provision a storage account (LRS + Cool default tier)

        • Use SQL Server's Backup to URL feature to take database backups directly to your storage account.





        share|improve this answer



























          11












          11








          11








          Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL.




          Typically server backup programs will coordinate with SQL Server through the Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) to ensure that SQL Server places the database files in a consistent state before volume snapshots are taken. At a minimum backup programs should create backups that are consistent on a per-volume basis.



          However, even in an enterprise environment where you have trusted professionals performing server backups using a configuration you can verify, very few DBAs would actually rely on server backups. Remember backups alone are irrelevant. Restores are what you actually care about.



          So how are you going to perform a restore if you rely on server backups? Not easily, that's for sure.



          So take backups. Then download them regularly from your hoster, or upload them to a cloud storage provider, eg:



          • Sign up for an Azure account

          • Provision a storage account (LRS + Cool default tier)

          • Use SQL Server's Backup to URL feature to take database backups directly to your storage account.





          share|improve this answer
















          Backup has no special functionality related to MSSQL.




          Typically server backup programs will coordinate with SQL Server through the Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) to ensure that SQL Server places the database files in a consistent state before volume snapshots are taken. At a minimum backup programs should create backups that are consistent on a per-volume basis.



          However, even in an enterprise environment where you have trusted professionals performing server backups using a configuration you can verify, very few DBAs would actually rely on server backups. Remember backups alone are irrelevant. Restores are what you actually care about.



          So how are you going to perform a restore if you rely on server backups? Not easily, that's for sure.



          So take backups. Then download them regularly from your hoster, or upload them to a cloud storage provider, eg:



          • Sign up for an Azure account

          • Provision a storage account (LRS + Cool default tier)

          • Use SQL Server's Backup to URL feature to take database backups directly to your storage account.






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 5 at 13:40

























          answered May 4 at 12:58









          David Browne - MicrosoftDavid Browne - Microsoft

          13.3k937




          13.3k937























              3














              While you should certainly take note of the points that David Browne makes I have used the drive snapshot approach for backups and have successfully restored small SQL databases from them. But see the caveats at the end of my answer - I would be very wary of attempting this on a large database.



              Most backup software of this type will allow you to mount the backup as a virtual drive. Once mounted you can just copy back the MDF file. You can either simply stop the SQL server service, replace the original file(s) then restart it, or attach the MDF file as a new database and copy back selected data from it.



              But:



              I have only ever used this for small databases set to simple logging. In this context small would mean the sort of size SQLExpress supports so this would apply to your system. When I'm using this sort of backup I use simple logging because the backup software we use takes a snapshot every 15 minutes so it gives me a pretty good granularity without needing full logging.



              I use this approach mainly for the sort of small SQL databases used by apps. Lots of end user apps use SQLExpress as their data store these days, just as some years ago lots of apps used Access MDB files, and in these circumstances I tend to view the database in the same way I'd view any other data file. You don't say what your database is used for so I can't advise you on how well this would work for you. The usual advice for backups applies: test your backups regularly to make sure you can restore from them.






              share|improve this answer























              • We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.

                – Ben
                May 5 at 11:52
















              3














              While you should certainly take note of the points that David Browne makes I have used the drive snapshot approach for backups and have successfully restored small SQL databases from them. But see the caveats at the end of my answer - I would be very wary of attempting this on a large database.



              Most backup software of this type will allow you to mount the backup as a virtual drive. Once mounted you can just copy back the MDF file. You can either simply stop the SQL server service, replace the original file(s) then restart it, or attach the MDF file as a new database and copy back selected data from it.



              But:



              I have only ever used this for small databases set to simple logging. In this context small would mean the sort of size SQLExpress supports so this would apply to your system. When I'm using this sort of backup I use simple logging because the backup software we use takes a snapshot every 15 minutes so it gives me a pretty good granularity without needing full logging.



              I use this approach mainly for the sort of small SQL databases used by apps. Lots of end user apps use SQLExpress as their data store these days, just as some years ago lots of apps used Access MDB files, and in these circumstances I tend to view the database in the same way I'd view any other data file. You don't say what your database is used for so I can't advise you on how well this would work for you. The usual advice for backups applies: test your backups regularly to make sure you can restore from them.






              share|improve this answer























              • We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.

                – Ben
                May 5 at 11:52














              3












              3








              3







              While you should certainly take note of the points that David Browne makes I have used the drive snapshot approach for backups and have successfully restored small SQL databases from them. But see the caveats at the end of my answer - I would be very wary of attempting this on a large database.



              Most backup software of this type will allow you to mount the backup as a virtual drive. Once mounted you can just copy back the MDF file. You can either simply stop the SQL server service, replace the original file(s) then restart it, or attach the MDF file as a new database and copy back selected data from it.



              But:



              I have only ever used this for small databases set to simple logging. In this context small would mean the sort of size SQLExpress supports so this would apply to your system. When I'm using this sort of backup I use simple logging because the backup software we use takes a snapshot every 15 minutes so it gives me a pretty good granularity without needing full logging.



              I use this approach mainly for the sort of small SQL databases used by apps. Lots of end user apps use SQLExpress as their data store these days, just as some years ago lots of apps used Access MDB files, and in these circumstances I tend to view the database in the same way I'd view any other data file. You don't say what your database is used for so I can't advise you on how well this would work for you. The usual advice for backups applies: test your backups regularly to make sure you can restore from them.






              share|improve this answer













              While you should certainly take note of the points that David Browne makes I have used the drive snapshot approach for backups and have successfully restored small SQL databases from them. But see the caveats at the end of my answer - I would be very wary of attempting this on a large database.



              Most backup software of this type will allow you to mount the backup as a virtual drive. Once mounted you can just copy back the MDF file. You can either simply stop the SQL server service, replace the original file(s) then restart it, or attach the MDF file as a new database and copy back selected data from it.



              But:



              I have only ever used this for small databases set to simple logging. In this context small would mean the sort of size SQLExpress supports so this would apply to your system. When I'm using this sort of backup I use simple logging because the backup software we use takes a snapshot every 15 minutes so it gives me a pretty good granularity without needing full logging.



              I use this approach mainly for the sort of small SQL databases used by apps. Lots of end user apps use SQLExpress as their data store these days, just as some years ago lots of apps used Access MDB files, and in these circumstances I tend to view the database in the same way I'd view any other data file. You don't say what your database is used for so I can't advise you on how well this would work for you. The usual advice for backups applies: test your backups regularly to make sure you can restore from them.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 5 at 6:08









              John RennieJohn Rennie

              1334




              1334












              • We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.

                – Ben
                May 5 at 11:52


















              • We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.

                – Ben
                May 5 at 11:52

















              We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.

              – Ben
              May 5 at 11:52






              We've successfully used snapshotting as a method of backup and DR with easy failover on multiple multi-terabyte databases (not SQL Server). Moving away from that model now, but as long as you've got enough kit and a big pipe between the two sets of disk arrays it's a viable solution, though hard to set-up.

              – Ben
              May 5 at 11:52












              2














              I agree with all the points mentioned above by David Browne and would like to add one more pertinent point here. Since you have not specified recovery model of database, I assume that it is Full recovery mode. Which means with each transaction log size will keep on growing until it occupies the whole disk(unless you have capped the size of Log auto increment).



              Once you take log backup, following happens:




              A transaction log backup allows you to backup the active part of the
              transaction log. So after you issue a "Full" or "Differential" backup
              the transaction log backup will have any transactions that were
              created after those other backups completed. After the transaction
              log backup is issued, the space within the transaction log can be
              reused for other processes. If a transaction log backup is not taken,
              the transaction log will continue to grow.




              Taking snapshot of disk will never clear the log inside the SQL server and moreover, you also have feature of compressed backup, which can be useful for keeping the size of backup really small. In case of disaster, using Full, differential and log backup you can achieve point in time recovery.



              One more thing to add here - Generally DBAs keep backup on different storage and not on the same storage where Data or log file resides. So, in case your disk of data or log file crashes, you are still safe because you have backups available on some other storage.



              I hope above helps.






              share|improve this answer



























                2














                I agree with all the points mentioned above by David Browne and would like to add one more pertinent point here. Since you have not specified recovery model of database, I assume that it is Full recovery mode. Which means with each transaction log size will keep on growing until it occupies the whole disk(unless you have capped the size of Log auto increment).



                Once you take log backup, following happens:




                A transaction log backup allows you to backup the active part of the
                transaction log. So after you issue a "Full" or "Differential" backup
                the transaction log backup will have any transactions that were
                created after those other backups completed. After the transaction
                log backup is issued, the space within the transaction log can be
                reused for other processes. If a transaction log backup is not taken,
                the transaction log will continue to grow.




                Taking snapshot of disk will never clear the log inside the SQL server and moreover, you also have feature of compressed backup, which can be useful for keeping the size of backup really small. In case of disaster, using Full, differential and log backup you can achieve point in time recovery.



                One more thing to add here - Generally DBAs keep backup on different storage and not on the same storage where Data or log file resides. So, in case your disk of data or log file crashes, you are still safe because you have backups available on some other storage.



                I hope above helps.






                share|improve this answer

























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  I agree with all the points mentioned above by David Browne and would like to add one more pertinent point here. Since you have not specified recovery model of database, I assume that it is Full recovery mode. Which means with each transaction log size will keep on growing until it occupies the whole disk(unless you have capped the size of Log auto increment).



                  Once you take log backup, following happens:




                  A transaction log backup allows you to backup the active part of the
                  transaction log. So after you issue a "Full" or "Differential" backup
                  the transaction log backup will have any transactions that were
                  created after those other backups completed. After the transaction
                  log backup is issued, the space within the transaction log can be
                  reused for other processes. If a transaction log backup is not taken,
                  the transaction log will continue to grow.




                  Taking snapshot of disk will never clear the log inside the SQL server and moreover, you also have feature of compressed backup, which can be useful for keeping the size of backup really small. In case of disaster, using Full, differential and log backup you can achieve point in time recovery.



                  One more thing to add here - Generally DBAs keep backup on different storage and not on the same storage where Data or log file resides. So, in case your disk of data or log file crashes, you are still safe because you have backups available on some other storage.



                  I hope above helps.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I agree with all the points mentioned above by David Browne and would like to add one more pertinent point here. Since you have not specified recovery model of database, I assume that it is Full recovery mode. Which means with each transaction log size will keep on growing until it occupies the whole disk(unless you have capped the size of Log auto increment).



                  Once you take log backup, following happens:




                  A transaction log backup allows you to backup the active part of the
                  transaction log. So after you issue a "Full" or "Differential" backup
                  the transaction log backup will have any transactions that were
                  created after those other backups completed. After the transaction
                  log backup is issued, the space within the transaction log can be
                  reused for other processes. If a transaction log backup is not taken,
                  the transaction log will continue to grow.




                  Taking snapshot of disk will never clear the log inside the SQL server and moreover, you also have feature of compressed backup, which can be useful for keeping the size of backup really small. In case of disaster, using Full, differential and log backup you can achieve point in time recovery.



                  One more thing to add here - Generally DBAs keep backup on different storage and not on the same storage where Data or log file resides. So, in case your disk of data or log file crashes, you are still safe because you have backups available on some other storage.



                  I hope above helps.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 5 at 5:06









                  Learning_DBAdminLearning_DBAdmin

                  1,028219




                  1,028219



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f237375%2fcan-full-drive-backup-be-used-instead-of-mssql-database-backup%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                      Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                      Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020