Does an attack redirected to an invisible target have disadvantage?How can you get advantage from Invisibility if attacking ends it?Does the Warcaster feat grant ranged spell attacks in melee range without disadvantage?Since advantage and disadvantage caused in a heavy obscured area cancel out, what effect does it have in combat?When attacking while invisible, when exactly does invisibility break?Does shield retroactively change the result of an attack?Do I have to “pre-cast” a reaction spell in order for it to be triggered?Does Chaos Bolt have to target someone else?Can you stay invisible by readying an attack instead of attacking?Does blocking an attack with the Shield spell still trigger Armor of Agathys?Do Steel Wind Strike's attacks have advantage or disadvantage against distant prone targets?

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Given 0s on Assignments with suspected and dismissed cheating?

What metal is most suitable for a ladder submerged in an underground water tank?

Why did the metro bus stop at each railway crossing, despite no warning indicating a train was coming?

Is my test coverage up to snuff?

Developers demotivated due to working on same project for more than 2 years

What is the status of the Lannisters after Season 8 Episode 5, "The Bells"?

Could there be something like aerobatic smoke trails in the vacuum of space?

Could a space colony 1g from the sun work?

Is the seat-belt sign activation when a pilot goes to the lavatory standard procedure?

Can anyone give me examples of the relative-determinative 'which'?

Why did Varys remove his rings?

Why commonly or frequently used fonts sizes are even numbers like 10px, 12px, 16px, 24px, or 32px?

What is this weird d12 for?

Will the volt, ampere, ohm or other electrical units change on May 20th, 2019?

Why would someone open a Netflix account using my Gmail address?

Does the Rogue's Reliable Talent feature work for thieves' tools, since the rogue is proficient in them?

What dog breeds survive the apocalypse for generations?

Holding rent money for my friend which amounts to over $10k?

Does addError() work outside of triggers?

Is there an academic word that means "to split hairs over"?

My bread in my bread maker rises and then falls down just after cooking starts

With today's technology, could iron be smelted at La Rinconada?

Windows 10 lock screen - display my own random images

Testing if os.path.exists with ArcPy?



Does an attack redirected to an invisible target have disadvantage?


How can you get advantage from Invisibility if attacking ends it?Does the Warcaster feat grant ranged spell attacks in melee range without disadvantage?Since advantage and disadvantage caused in a heavy obscured area cancel out, what effect does it have in combat?When attacking while invisible, when exactly does invisibility break?Does shield retroactively change the result of an attack?Do I have to “pre-cast” a reaction spell in order for it to be triggered?Does Chaos Bolt have to target someone else?Can you stay invisible by readying an attack instead of attacking?Does blocking an attack with the Shield spell still trigger Armor of Agathys?Do Steel Wind Strike's attacks have advantage or disadvantage against distant prone targets?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








10












$begingroup$


An interesting combo came up in gameplay: An invisible party member chose to defend another party member using their non-spell, non-attack reaction (arrow catching shield.)



In the description for the invisibility spell (PH pg. 254), it says:




The spell ends for a target that attacks or casts a spell.




In the description for the arrow-catching shield, it says




In addition, whenever an attacker makes a ranged attack against a
target within 5 feet of you, you can use your reaction to become the
target of the attack instead.




According to the rules of the invisible condition (PHB, pg. 291):




Attack rolls against you have disadvantage.




Should the attack now be with disadvantage, even though it's already been made?



The central question is Does redirecting an attack to a different target cause the attack to be made under the rules for the conditions affecting the new target?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    How about I delete and re-ask?
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    May 4 at 10:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's no need to delete it. Just edit one of the two questions out of this post and ask it separately. Then this one can be reopened, and the other question can be answered properly as well.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 4 at 10:10











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks. Reworded so specifically address the condition aspect.
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    May 4 at 10:20

















10












$begingroup$


An interesting combo came up in gameplay: An invisible party member chose to defend another party member using their non-spell, non-attack reaction (arrow catching shield.)



In the description for the invisibility spell (PH pg. 254), it says:




The spell ends for a target that attacks or casts a spell.




In the description for the arrow-catching shield, it says




In addition, whenever an attacker makes a ranged attack against a
target within 5 feet of you, you can use your reaction to become the
target of the attack instead.




According to the rules of the invisible condition (PHB, pg. 291):




Attack rolls against you have disadvantage.




Should the attack now be with disadvantage, even though it's already been made?



The central question is Does redirecting an attack to a different target cause the attack to be made under the rules for the conditions affecting the new target?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    How about I delete and re-ask?
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    May 4 at 10:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's no need to delete it. Just edit one of the two questions out of this post and ask it separately. Then this one can be reopened, and the other question can be answered properly as well.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 4 at 10:10











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks. Reworded so specifically address the condition aspect.
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    May 4 at 10:20













10












10








10





$begingroup$


An interesting combo came up in gameplay: An invisible party member chose to defend another party member using their non-spell, non-attack reaction (arrow catching shield.)



In the description for the invisibility spell (PH pg. 254), it says:




The spell ends for a target that attacks or casts a spell.




In the description for the arrow-catching shield, it says




In addition, whenever an attacker makes a ranged attack against a
target within 5 feet of you, you can use your reaction to become the
target of the attack instead.




According to the rules of the invisible condition (PHB, pg. 291):




Attack rolls against you have disadvantage.




Should the attack now be with disadvantage, even though it's already been made?



The central question is Does redirecting an attack to a different target cause the attack to be made under the rules for the conditions affecting the new target?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




An interesting combo came up in gameplay: An invisible party member chose to defend another party member using their non-spell, non-attack reaction (arrow catching shield.)



In the description for the invisibility spell (PH pg. 254), it says:




The spell ends for a target that attacks or casts a spell.




In the description for the arrow-catching shield, it says




In addition, whenever an attacker makes a ranged attack against a
target within 5 feet of you, you can use your reaction to become the
target of the attack instead.




According to the rules of the invisible condition (PHB, pg. 291):




Attack rolls against you have disadvantage.




Should the attack now be with disadvantage, even though it's already been made?



The central question is Does redirecting an attack to a different target cause the attack to be made under the rules for the conditions affecting the new target?







dnd-5e spells invisibility advantage-and-disadvantage






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 4 at 10:38









Rubiksmoose

64.7k10310469




64.7k10310469










asked May 4 at 6:37









Sum of e D piSum of e D pi

662124




662124











  • $begingroup$
    How about I delete and re-ask?
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    May 4 at 10:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's no need to delete it. Just edit one of the two questions out of this post and ask it separately. Then this one can be reopened, and the other question can be answered properly as well.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 4 at 10:10











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks. Reworded so specifically address the condition aspect.
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    May 4 at 10:20
















  • $begingroup$
    How about I delete and re-ask?
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    May 4 at 10:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's no need to delete it. Just edit one of the two questions out of this post and ask it separately. Then this one can be reopened, and the other question can be answered properly as well.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    May 4 at 10:10











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks. Reworded so specifically address the condition aspect.
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    May 4 at 10:20















$begingroup$
How about I delete and re-ask?
$endgroup$
– Sum of e D pi
May 4 at 10:10




$begingroup$
How about I delete and re-ask?
$endgroup$
– Sum of e D pi
May 4 at 10:10




1




1




$begingroup$
There's no need to delete it. Just edit one of the two questions out of this post and ask it separately. Then this one can be reopened, and the other question can be answered properly as well.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 4 at 10:10





$begingroup$
There's no need to delete it. Just edit one of the two questions out of this post and ask it separately. Then this one can be reopened, and the other question can be answered properly as well.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
May 4 at 10:10













$begingroup$
Thanks. Reworded so specifically address the condition aspect.
$endgroup$
– Sum of e D pi
May 4 at 10:20




$begingroup$
Thanks. Reworded so specifically address the condition aspect.
$endgroup$
– Sum of e D pi
May 4 at 10:20










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

It's not an attack, nor casting a spell, so invisibility does not end.



My reading of the shield is that you have to declare that you direct the arrow at yourself before the arrow has hit or missed the target. If the GM has already rolled for the attack and you declare that you want to redirect the arrow at yourself, that attack roll becomes invalid and the GM makes a new attack roll with disadvantage against you.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm giving the correct answer to you because you also address the "outside the rules aspect." Out DM tends to announce "The monster hits the mage for..." And then we do our reactions and the re-roll aspect seems the more... real-world gameplay fair. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    2 days ago


















6












$begingroup$

When the attack is declared you can choose to make yourself the target of it. If you do you remain invisible (because you have not attacked or cast a spell) and the attack is made with disadvantage as a result of your invisibility. If you don’t so choose the attack is made against your ally normally.



If you wait until the attack has been rolled you no longer have the option to make yourself the target. The shield is not one of those effects where you get to see the roll before you decide to use it.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer! I'm going to try and train our DM to announce the attack first before he declares a hit, just so I can have a better chance to use this item,
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    2 days ago


















1












$begingroup$

No for both



Invisibility, from the spell of the same name, only ends when you make an attack or cast a spell as you stated.



Being invisible wouldn't cause disadvantage if you redirect the attack since the attack roll was made against your ally, not you.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    FYI, the question has been updated to present just one question.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    May 4 at 10:41











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147431%2fdoes-an-attack-redirected-to-an-invisible-target-have-disadvantage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

It's not an attack, nor casting a spell, so invisibility does not end.



My reading of the shield is that you have to declare that you direct the arrow at yourself before the arrow has hit or missed the target. If the GM has already rolled for the attack and you declare that you want to redirect the arrow at yourself, that attack roll becomes invalid and the GM makes a new attack roll with disadvantage against you.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm giving the correct answer to you because you also address the "outside the rules aspect." Out DM tends to announce "The monster hits the mage for..." And then we do our reactions and the re-roll aspect seems the more... real-world gameplay fair. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    2 days ago















4












$begingroup$

It's not an attack, nor casting a spell, so invisibility does not end.



My reading of the shield is that you have to declare that you direct the arrow at yourself before the arrow has hit or missed the target. If the GM has already rolled for the attack and you declare that you want to redirect the arrow at yourself, that attack roll becomes invalid and the GM makes a new attack roll with disadvantage against you.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm giving the correct answer to you because you also address the "outside the rules aspect." Out DM tends to announce "The monster hits the mage for..." And then we do our reactions and the re-roll aspect seems the more... real-world gameplay fair. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    2 days ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

It's not an attack, nor casting a spell, so invisibility does not end.



My reading of the shield is that you have to declare that you direct the arrow at yourself before the arrow has hit or missed the target. If the GM has already rolled for the attack and you declare that you want to redirect the arrow at yourself, that attack roll becomes invalid and the GM makes a new attack roll with disadvantage against you.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



It's not an attack, nor casting a spell, so invisibility does not end.



My reading of the shield is that you have to declare that you direct the arrow at yourself before the arrow has hit or missed the target. If the GM has already rolled for the attack and you declare that you want to redirect the arrow at yourself, that attack roll becomes invalid and the GM makes a new attack roll with disadvantage against you.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 4 at 8:38









YoraYora

2,979724




2,979724











  • $begingroup$
    I'm giving the correct answer to you because you also address the "outside the rules aspect." Out DM tends to announce "The monster hits the mage for..." And then we do our reactions and the re-roll aspect seems the more... real-world gameplay fair. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I'm giving the correct answer to you because you also address the "outside the rules aspect." Out DM tends to announce "The monster hits the mage for..." And then we do our reactions and the re-roll aspect seems the more... real-world gameplay fair. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
I'm giving the correct answer to you because you also address the "outside the rules aspect." Out DM tends to announce "The monster hits the mage for..." And then we do our reactions and the re-roll aspect seems the more... real-world gameplay fair. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Sum of e D pi
2 days ago




$begingroup$
I'm giving the correct answer to you because you also address the "outside the rules aspect." Out DM tends to announce "The monster hits the mage for..." And then we do our reactions and the re-roll aspect seems the more... real-world gameplay fair. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Sum of e D pi
2 days ago













6












$begingroup$

When the attack is declared you can choose to make yourself the target of it. If you do you remain invisible (because you have not attacked or cast a spell) and the attack is made with disadvantage as a result of your invisibility. If you don’t so choose the attack is made against your ally normally.



If you wait until the attack has been rolled you no longer have the option to make yourself the target. The shield is not one of those effects where you get to see the roll before you decide to use it.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer! I'm going to try and train our DM to announce the attack first before he declares a hit, just so I can have a better chance to use this item,
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    2 days ago















6












$begingroup$

When the attack is declared you can choose to make yourself the target of it. If you do you remain invisible (because you have not attacked or cast a spell) and the attack is made with disadvantage as a result of your invisibility. If you don’t so choose the attack is made against your ally normally.



If you wait until the attack has been rolled you no longer have the option to make yourself the target. The shield is not one of those effects where you get to see the roll before you decide to use it.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer! I'm going to try and train our DM to announce the attack first before he declares a hit, just so I can have a better chance to use this item,
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    2 days ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$

When the attack is declared you can choose to make yourself the target of it. If you do you remain invisible (because you have not attacked or cast a spell) and the attack is made with disadvantage as a result of your invisibility. If you don’t so choose the attack is made against your ally normally.



If you wait until the attack has been rolled you no longer have the option to make yourself the target. The shield is not one of those effects where you get to see the roll before you decide to use it.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



When the attack is declared you can choose to make yourself the target of it. If you do you remain invisible (because you have not attacked or cast a spell) and the attack is made with disadvantage as a result of your invisibility. If you don’t so choose the attack is made against your ally normally.



If you wait until the attack has been rolled you no longer have the option to make yourself the target. The shield is not one of those effects where you get to see the roll before you decide to use it.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 4 at 11:00









Dale MDale M

113k24295499




113k24295499











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer! I'm going to try and train our DM to announce the attack first before he declares a hit, just so I can have a better chance to use this item,
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer! I'm going to try and train our DM to announce the attack first before he declares a hit, just so I can have a better chance to use this item,
    $endgroup$
    – Sum of e D pi
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
Thanks for the answer! I'm going to try and train our DM to announce the attack first before he declares a hit, just so I can have a better chance to use this item,
$endgroup$
– Sum of e D pi
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Thanks for the answer! I'm going to try and train our DM to announce the attack first before he declares a hit, just so I can have a better chance to use this item,
$endgroup$
– Sum of e D pi
2 days ago











1












$begingroup$

No for both



Invisibility, from the spell of the same name, only ends when you make an attack or cast a spell as you stated.



Being invisible wouldn't cause disadvantage if you redirect the attack since the attack roll was made against your ally, not you.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    FYI, the question has been updated to present just one question.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    May 4 at 10:41















1












$begingroup$

No for both



Invisibility, from the spell of the same name, only ends when you make an attack or cast a spell as you stated.



Being invisible wouldn't cause disadvantage if you redirect the attack since the attack roll was made against your ally, not you.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    FYI, the question has been updated to present just one question.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    May 4 at 10:41













1












1








1





$begingroup$

No for both



Invisibility, from the spell of the same name, only ends when you make an attack or cast a spell as you stated.



Being invisible wouldn't cause disadvantage if you redirect the attack since the attack roll was made against your ally, not you.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



No for both



Invisibility, from the spell of the same name, only ends when you make an attack or cast a spell as you stated.



Being invisible wouldn't cause disadvantage if you redirect the attack since the attack roll was made against your ally, not you.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 4 at 7:56









V2Blast

29.1k5105177




29.1k5105177










answered May 4 at 7:19









Allan MillsAllan Mills

1,90420




1,90420







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    FYI, the question has been updated to present just one question.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    May 4 at 10:41












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    FYI, the question has been updated to present just one question.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    May 4 at 10:41







1




1




$begingroup$
FYI, the question has been updated to present just one question.
$endgroup$
– doppelgreener
May 4 at 10:41




$begingroup$
FYI, the question has been updated to present just one question.
$endgroup$
– doppelgreener
May 4 at 10:41

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147431%2fdoes-an-attack-redirected-to-an-invisible-target-have-disadvantage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







yohE l3 zr7,NcaW3uBSXPsl02FmM9C8pcaZjBYpAl53Bm5oZcis1,Wy,X6Mz,ZnwY,R4L6BjjwRPsFIk
V,I6J1Zqb85DzuzCUkf bxjodR,4 SOp oAGyYWbeCQTuF,goWRQNUwIv Z3ugYr c40BrKvO oXA wi6gdyPLrm0f9Hqf7x,7SA xObAksVR12

Popular posts from this blog

Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020