What wavelength was the CMB originally?What did recombination look like?When was the cosmic background radiation in the visible spectrum?Is it possible that one of the quasars we see is an ancient Milky Way?Redshift of distant galaxies: why not a doppler effect?Is the universe actually expanding?Estimation of Location of First Acoustic PeakWhy is it said that photon-wavelengths have increased by a factor of 1000 since our universe became transparent to light?Acceleration of Universe expansionWhy does the redshift formula hold true when measuring the expansion of the universe?Is the expansion of the universe really accelerating? Or does it just look like it?Cause of observed galactic red shift or acceleration in expansion of the universe: velocity vs gravity.Gravitational redshift and Energy of a photon
Can anyone give me examples of the relative-determinative 'which'?
Is there any deeper thematic meaning to the white horse that Arya finds in The Bells (S08E05)?
When did game consoles begin including FPUs?
Why did the metro bus stop at each railway crossing, despite no warning indicating a train was coming?
Slice a list based on an index and items behind it in python
How to describe a building set which is like LEGO without using the "LEGO" word?
Why did the UK remove the 'European Union' from its passport?
What are the implications of XORing ciphertext with plaintext?
Promotion comes with unexpected 24/7/365 on-call
What is the effect of the Feeblemind spell on Ability Score Improvements?
Are there microwaves to heat baby food at Brussels airport?
How do I know which cipher suites can be disabled?
Understanding Deutch's Algorithm
Holding rent money for my friend which amounts to over $10k?
What is the status of the Lannisters after Season 8 Episode 5, "The Bells"?
Capital gains on stocks sold to take initial investment off the table
Why does SSL Labs now consider CBC suites weak?
Why would someone open a Netflix account using my Gmail address?
My bread in my bread maker rises and then falls down just after cooking starts
Using chord iii in a chord progression (major key)
I recently started my machine learning PhD and I have absolutely no idea what I'm doing
Why doesn't Iron Man's action affect this person in Endgame?
labelled end points on logic diagram
Is the seat-belt sign activation when a pilot goes to the lavatory standard procedure?
What wavelength was the CMB originally?
What did recombination look like?When was the cosmic background radiation in the visible spectrum?Is it possible that one of the quasars we see is an ancient Milky Way?Redshift of distant galaxies: why not a doppler effect?Is the universe actually expanding?Estimation of Location of First Acoustic PeakWhy is it said that photon-wavelengths have increased by a factor of 1000 since our universe became transparent to light?Acceleration of Universe expansionWhy does the redshift formula hold true when measuring the expansion of the universe?Is the expansion of the universe really accelerating? Or does it just look like it?Cause of observed galactic red shift or acceleration in expansion of the universe: velocity vs gravity.Gravitational redshift and Energy of a photon
$begingroup$
What wavelength was the light that became the CMB after factoring out redshift?
Is it safe to assume that what we're seeing in the CMB was emitted at a distance of approx:
c = 299792458 m/s
Mpc = 3.08567758149137 * (10 ^ 22) m
expansionLow = ((74300 - 2100) m/s) / Mpc
expansionHigh = ((74300 + 2100) m/s) / Mpc
distanceHigh = c / expansionLow = 1.28125 * (10 ^ 26) m
distanceLow = c / expansionHigh = 1.21082 * (10 ^ 26) m
For an emission distance of 1.21082 - 1.28125 * (10 ^ 26) m?
(Expansion rate pulled from the story Speed of Universe's Expansion Measured Better Than Ever.)
cosmology space-expansion cosmic-microwave-background redshift
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What wavelength was the light that became the CMB after factoring out redshift?
Is it safe to assume that what we're seeing in the CMB was emitted at a distance of approx:
c = 299792458 m/s
Mpc = 3.08567758149137 * (10 ^ 22) m
expansionLow = ((74300 - 2100) m/s) / Mpc
expansionHigh = ((74300 + 2100) m/s) / Mpc
distanceHigh = c / expansionLow = 1.28125 * (10 ^ 26) m
distanceLow = c / expansionHigh = 1.21082 * (10 ^ 26) m
For an emission distance of 1.21082 - 1.28125 * (10 ^ 26) m?
(Expansion rate pulled from the story Speed of Universe's Expansion Measured Better Than Ever.)
cosmology space-expansion cosmic-microwave-background redshift
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/a/126133/44126
$endgroup$
– rob♦
May 4 at 1:21
$begingroup$
FWIW, you can see a sample of the colour at the bottom of Jim's answer physics.stackexchange.com/a/133943/123208
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
May 4 at 12:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What wavelength was the light that became the CMB after factoring out redshift?
Is it safe to assume that what we're seeing in the CMB was emitted at a distance of approx:
c = 299792458 m/s
Mpc = 3.08567758149137 * (10 ^ 22) m
expansionLow = ((74300 - 2100) m/s) / Mpc
expansionHigh = ((74300 + 2100) m/s) / Mpc
distanceHigh = c / expansionLow = 1.28125 * (10 ^ 26) m
distanceLow = c / expansionHigh = 1.21082 * (10 ^ 26) m
For an emission distance of 1.21082 - 1.28125 * (10 ^ 26) m?
(Expansion rate pulled from the story Speed of Universe's Expansion Measured Better Than Ever.)
cosmology space-expansion cosmic-microwave-background redshift
$endgroup$
What wavelength was the light that became the CMB after factoring out redshift?
Is it safe to assume that what we're seeing in the CMB was emitted at a distance of approx:
c = 299792458 m/s
Mpc = 3.08567758149137 * (10 ^ 22) m
expansionLow = ((74300 - 2100) m/s) / Mpc
expansionHigh = ((74300 + 2100) m/s) / Mpc
distanceHigh = c / expansionLow = 1.28125 * (10 ^ 26) m
distanceLow = c / expansionHigh = 1.21082 * (10 ^ 26) m
For an emission distance of 1.21082 - 1.28125 * (10 ^ 26) m?
(Expansion rate pulled from the story Speed of Universe's Expansion Measured Better Than Ever.)
cosmology space-expansion cosmic-microwave-background redshift
cosmology space-expansion cosmic-microwave-background redshift
edited May 4 at 9:38
Qmechanic♦
109k122041268
109k122041268
asked May 4 at 0:42
CoryGCoryG
23619
23619
1
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/a/126133/44126
$endgroup$
– rob♦
May 4 at 1:21
$begingroup$
FWIW, you can see a sample of the colour at the bottom of Jim's answer physics.stackexchange.com/a/133943/123208
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
May 4 at 12:04
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/a/126133/44126
$endgroup$
– rob♦
May 4 at 1:21
$begingroup$
FWIW, you can see a sample of the colour at the bottom of Jim's answer physics.stackexchange.com/a/133943/123208
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
May 4 at 12:04
1
1
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/a/126133/44126
$endgroup$
– rob♦
May 4 at 1:21
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/a/126133/44126
$endgroup$
– rob♦
May 4 at 1:21
$begingroup$
FWIW, you can see a sample of the colour at the bottom of Jim's answer physics.stackexchange.com/a/133943/123208
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
May 4 at 12:04
$begingroup$
FWIW, you can see a sample of the colour at the bottom of Jim's answer physics.stackexchange.com/a/133943/123208
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
May 4 at 12:04
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The redshift of the CMB is 1089, so the wavelength at emmision was 1/(1089+1) of the wavelength we receive today. The distance at which it was emmited was approximately 0.0416 Glyr, while the distance today has expanded to 45 Glyr (a factor of 1090), which is a little bit less than the particle horizon (assuming that H0=67150m/Mpc/sec, Ωr=5e-5, Ωm=0.317, Ωλ=1-Ωr-Ωm).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The present cosmic microwave background was emitted when the initial plasma formed during the Big Bang had cooled down enough to convert into gas - mostly hydrogen and helium, which then was transparent to radiation.
The reason it was at this time is that hot gas does not glow or absorb much at all: think, for example, of the flame from a candle: there is a simple experiment one can do which involves holding (using a suitable tong!) a piece of metal wire just above the visible part of the flame. It will heat up and glow orange, meaning the air above that flame must be at the same temperature as orange-glowing metal, yet that air itself does not glow at all (the bright yellow visible flame glow is actually due to tiny particles of soot - solids - glowing in the same manner as the metal, not the hot air/gases). The only way that hot neutral gas can emit light is by molecular and atomic transitions, which comprise a line spectrum, not a broad spectrum. On the other hand, plasma can emit and absorb at all wavelengths because its free-roaming charged particles can interact with electromagnetic waves at all frequencies.
The temperature where this happens is roughly around 5000 K, I believe (there is no "sharp" phase boundary with plasma, it's a so-called "second order" transition where the two phases "shade" smoothly from one to the other - as a gas gets hotter and hotter, some atoms have enough energy to bump their electrons off, and that amount goes up with increased temperature). Wien's law says the peak wavelength will be around
$$lambda_mathrmpeak approx frac2.898 times 10^6 mathrmnm cdot KT$$
With $T = 5000 mathrmK$, that $lambda_mathrmpeak$ is about 580 nm, which is visible light.
So the "CMB" was initially a "Cosmic Visible Light Background", and indeed "space itself" was worse than a blast furnace at this point, because when you're surrounded on all sides by light of exactly a thermal spectrum and intensity, you are effectively within a thermal source at that temperature.
ADD: Thanks to the comment given below, the more accurate temperature is 3000 K. The wavelength is thus around 970 nm, which is the near infrared (NIR) band, but there will still be a noticeable tail in the visible light spectrum: this temperature is quite around that of a tungsten bulb filament.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The multiplier given in the other answer suggests it would be a peak of 174.6507THz (the CMB peak reaching us is at 169.23GHz,) this is quite a ways under the PHz range of visible light. Where did you get the equation and that 2.898*10^6 from?
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 3:54
$begingroup$
The Wien wavelength constant is tabulated at: physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?bwien and just converted to nanometer-kelvins as that's a more appropriately sized unit for these cases. Also, visible light is around 400-750 THz (IIRC). 1 PHz or above is UV light, not visible.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 4:16
$begingroup$
Ah, I screwed up the exponent when looking at it, it's 516.8835THz - still quite a ways from the 174.6507THz from the previous answer based on the observed CMB peak though (looks like that corresponds to 1716.5260nm.)
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 4:26
1
$begingroup$
It was about 3000 K rather than 5000. There are still a good amount of ions in a gas with a temperature of 5000 K. Light would have traveled a nice distance before being Thompson scattered by the time the universe had cooled to 5000 K. A nice distance isn't long enough. The universe had to cool to about 3000 K before light could essentially travel forever before being scattered.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
May 4 at 7:22
$begingroup$
@David Hammen : Thanks for added precision, I just pulled that number off the top of my head as a rough guesstimate. (Nonetheless, factor of 2 ain't so bad for astronomy :g:) At least then that gives a peak wavelength in the near infrared, and of about the same order of magnitude, so you still get a sizeable visible tail.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 7:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477758%2fwhat-wavelength-was-the-cmb-originally%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The redshift of the CMB is 1089, so the wavelength at emmision was 1/(1089+1) of the wavelength we receive today. The distance at which it was emmited was approximately 0.0416 Glyr, while the distance today has expanded to 45 Glyr (a factor of 1090), which is a little bit less than the particle horizon (assuming that H0=67150m/Mpc/sec, Ωr=5e-5, Ωm=0.317, Ωλ=1-Ωr-Ωm).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The redshift of the CMB is 1089, so the wavelength at emmision was 1/(1089+1) of the wavelength we receive today. The distance at which it was emmited was approximately 0.0416 Glyr, while the distance today has expanded to 45 Glyr (a factor of 1090), which is a little bit less than the particle horizon (assuming that H0=67150m/Mpc/sec, Ωr=5e-5, Ωm=0.317, Ωλ=1-Ωr-Ωm).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The redshift of the CMB is 1089, so the wavelength at emmision was 1/(1089+1) of the wavelength we receive today. The distance at which it was emmited was approximately 0.0416 Glyr, while the distance today has expanded to 45 Glyr (a factor of 1090), which is a little bit less than the particle horizon (assuming that H0=67150m/Mpc/sec, Ωr=5e-5, Ωm=0.317, Ωλ=1-Ωr-Ωm).
$endgroup$
The redshift of the CMB is 1089, so the wavelength at emmision was 1/(1089+1) of the wavelength we receive today. The distance at which it was emmited was approximately 0.0416 Glyr, while the distance today has expanded to 45 Glyr (a factor of 1090), which is a little bit less than the particle horizon (assuming that H0=67150m/Mpc/sec, Ωr=5e-5, Ωm=0.317, Ωλ=1-Ωr-Ωm).
edited May 4 at 0:58
answered May 4 at 0:49
YukterezYukterez
4,85411437
4,85411437
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The present cosmic microwave background was emitted when the initial plasma formed during the Big Bang had cooled down enough to convert into gas - mostly hydrogen and helium, which then was transparent to radiation.
The reason it was at this time is that hot gas does not glow or absorb much at all: think, for example, of the flame from a candle: there is a simple experiment one can do which involves holding (using a suitable tong!) a piece of metal wire just above the visible part of the flame. It will heat up and glow orange, meaning the air above that flame must be at the same temperature as orange-glowing metal, yet that air itself does not glow at all (the bright yellow visible flame glow is actually due to tiny particles of soot - solids - glowing in the same manner as the metal, not the hot air/gases). The only way that hot neutral gas can emit light is by molecular and atomic transitions, which comprise a line spectrum, not a broad spectrum. On the other hand, plasma can emit and absorb at all wavelengths because its free-roaming charged particles can interact with electromagnetic waves at all frequencies.
The temperature where this happens is roughly around 5000 K, I believe (there is no "sharp" phase boundary with plasma, it's a so-called "second order" transition where the two phases "shade" smoothly from one to the other - as a gas gets hotter and hotter, some atoms have enough energy to bump their electrons off, and that amount goes up with increased temperature). Wien's law says the peak wavelength will be around
$$lambda_mathrmpeak approx frac2.898 times 10^6 mathrmnm cdot KT$$
With $T = 5000 mathrmK$, that $lambda_mathrmpeak$ is about 580 nm, which is visible light.
So the "CMB" was initially a "Cosmic Visible Light Background", and indeed "space itself" was worse than a blast furnace at this point, because when you're surrounded on all sides by light of exactly a thermal spectrum and intensity, you are effectively within a thermal source at that temperature.
ADD: Thanks to the comment given below, the more accurate temperature is 3000 K. The wavelength is thus around 970 nm, which is the near infrared (NIR) band, but there will still be a noticeable tail in the visible light spectrum: this temperature is quite around that of a tungsten bulb filament.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The multiplier given in the other answer suggests it would be a peak of 174.6507THz (the CMB peak reaching us is at 169.23GHz,) this is quite a ways under the PHz range of visible light. Where did you get the equation and that 2.898*10^6 from?
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 3:54
$begingroup$
The Wien wavelength constant is tabulated at: physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?bwien and just converted to nanometer-kelvins as that's a more appropriately sized unit for these cases. Also, visible light is around 400-750 THz (IIRC). 1 PHz or above is UV light, not visible.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 4:16
$begingroup$
Ah, I screwed up the exponent when looking at it, it's 516.8835THz - still quite a ways from the 174.6507THz from the previous answer based on the observed CMB peak though (looks like that corresponds to 1716.5260nm.)
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 4:26
1
$begingroup$
It was about 3000 K rather than 5000. There are still a good amount of ions in a gas with a temperature of 5000 K. Light would have traveled a nice distance before being Thompson scattered by the time the universe had cooled to 5000 K. A nice distance isn't long enough. The universe had to cool to about 3000 K before light could essentially travel forever before being scattered.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
May 4 at 7:22
$begingroup$
@David Hammen : Thanks for added precision, I just pulled that number off the top of my head as a rough guesstimate. (Nonetheless, factor of 2 ain't so bad for astronomy :g:) At least then that gives a peak wavelength in the near infrared, and of about the same order of magnitude, so you still get a sizeable visible tail.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 7:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The present cosmic microwave background was emitted when the initial plasma formed during the Big Bang had cooled down enough to convert into gas - mostly hydrogen and helium, which then was transparent to radiation.
The reason it was at this time is that hot gas does not glow or absorb much at all: think, for example, of the flame from a candle: there is a simple experiment one can do which involves holding (using a suitable tong!) a piece of metal wire just above the visible part of the flame. It will heat up and glow orange, meaning the air above that flame must be at the same temperature as orange-glowing metal, yet that air itself does not glow at all (the bright yellow visible flame glow is actually due to tiny particles of soot - solids - glowing in the same manner as the metal, not the hot air/gases). The only way that hot neutral gas can emit light is by molecular and atomic transitions, which comprise a line spectrum, not a broad spectrum. On the other hand, plasma can emit and absorb at all wavelengths because its free-roaming charged particles can interact with electromagnetic waves at all frequencies.
The temperature where this happens is roughly around 5000 K, I believe (there is no "sharp" phase boundary with plasma, it's a so-called "second order" transition where the two phases "shade" smoothly from one to the other - as a gas gets hotter and hotter, some atoms have enough energy to bump their electrons off, and that amount goes up with increased temperature). Wien's law says the peak wavelength will be around
$$lambda_mathrmpeak approx frac2.898 times 10^6 mathrmnm cdot KT$$
With $T = 5000 mathrmK$, that $lambda_mathrmpeak$ is about 580 nm, which is visible light.
So the "CMB" was initially a "Cosmic Visible Light Background", and indeed "space itself" was worse than a blast furnace at this point, because when you're surrounded on all sides by light of exactly a thermal spectrum and intensity, you are effectively within a thermal source at that temperature.
ADD: Thanks to the comment given below, the more accurate temperature is 3000 K. The wavelength is thus around 970 nm, which is the near infrared (NIR) band, but there will still be a noticeable tail in the visible light spectrum: this temperature is quite around that of a tungsten bulb filament.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The multiplier given in the other answer suggests it would be a peak of 174.6507THz (the CMB peak reaching us is at 169.23GHz,) this is quite a ways under the PHz range of visible light. Where did you get the equation and that 2.898*10^6 from?
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 3:54
$begingroup$
The Wien wavelength constant is tabulated at: physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?bwien and just converted to nanometer-kelvins as that's a more appropriately sized unit for these cases. Also, visible light is around 400-750 THz (IIRC). 1 PHz or above is UV light, not visible.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 4:16
$begingroup$
Ah, I screwed up the exponent when looking at it, it's 516.8835THz - still quite a ways from the 174.6507THz from the previous answer based on the observed CMB peak though (looks like that corresponds to 1716.5260nm.)
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 4:26
1
$begingroup$
It was about 3000 K rather than 5000. There are still a good amount of ions in a gas with a temperature of 5000 K. Light would have traveled a nice distance before being Thompson scattered by the time the universe had cooled to 5000 K. A nice distance isn't long enough. The universe had to cool to about 3000 K before light could essentially travel forever before being scattered.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
May 4 at 7:22
$begingroup$
@David Hammen : Thanks for added precision, I just pulled that number off the top of my head as a rough guesstimate. (Nonetheless, factor of 2 ain't so bad for astronomy :g:) At least then that gives a peak wavelength in the near infrared, and of about the same order of magnitude, so you still get a sizeable visible tail.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 7:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The present cosmic microwave background was emitted when the initial plasma formed during the Big Bang had cooled down enough to convert into gas - mostly hydrogen and helium, which then was transparent to radiation.
The reason it was at this time is that hot gas does not glow or absorb much at all: think, for example, of the flame from a candle: there is a simple experiment one can do which involves holding (using a suitable tong!) a piece of metal wire just above the visible part of the flame. It will heat up and glow orange, meaning the air above that flame must be at the same temperature as orange-glowing metal, yet that air itself does not glow at all (the bright yellow visible flame glow is actually due to tiny particles of soot - solids - glowing in the same manner as the metal, not the hot air/gases). The only way that hot neutral gas can emit light is by molecular and atomic transitions, which comprise a line spectrum, not a broad spectrum. On the other hand, plasma can emit and absorb at all wavelengths because its free-roaming charged particles can interact with electromagnetic waves at all frequencies.
The temperature where this happens is roughly around 5000 K, I believe (there is no "sharp" phase boundary with plasma, it's a so-called "second order" transition where the two phases "shade" smoothly from one to the other - as a gas gets hotter and hotter, some atoms have enough energy to bump their electrons off, and that amount goes up with increased temperature). Wien's law says the peak wavelength will be around
$$lambda_mathrmpeak approx frac2.898 times 10^6 mathrmnm cdot KT$$
With $T = 5000 mathrmK$, that $lambda_mathrmpeak$ is about 580 nm, which is visible light.
So the "CMB" was initially a "Cosmic Visible Light Background", and indeed "space itself" was worse than a blast furnace at this point, because when you're surrounded on all sides by light of exactly a thermal spectrum and intensity, you are effectively within a thermal source at that temperature.
ADD: Thanks to the comment given below, the more accurate temperature is 3000 K. The wavelength is thus around 970 nm, which is the near infrared (NIR) band, but there will still be a noticeable tail in the visible light spectrum: this temperature is quite around that of a tungsten bulb filament.
$endgroup$
The present cosmic microwave background was emitted when the initial plasma formed during the Big Bang had cooled down enough to convert into gas - mostly hydrogen and helium, which then was transparent to radiation.
The reason it was at this time is that hot gas does not glow or absorb much at all: think, for example, of the flame from a candle: there is a simple experiment one can do which involves holding (using a suitable tong!) a piece of metal wire just above the visible part of the flame. It will heat up and glow orange, meaning the air above that flame must be at the same temperature as orange-glowing metal, yet that air itself does not glow at all (the bright yellow visible flame glow is actually due to tiny particles of soot - solids - glowing in the same manner as the metal, not the hot air/gases). The only way that hot neutral gas can emit light is by molecular and atomic transitions, which comprise a line spectrum, not a broad spectrum. On the other hand, plasma can emit and absorb at all wavelengths because its free-roaming charged particles can interact with electromagnetic waves at all frequencies.
The temperature where this happens is roughly around 5000 K, I believe (there is no "sharp" phase boundary with plasma, it's a so-called "second order" transition where the two phases "shade" smoothly from one to the other - as a gas gets hotter and hotter, some atoms have enough energy to bump their electrons off, and that amount goes up with increased temperature). Wien's law says the peak wavelength will be around
$$lambda_mathrmpeak approx frac2.898 times 10^6 mathrmnm cdot KT$$
With $T = 5000 mathrmK$, that $lambda_mathrmpeak$ is about 580 nm, which is visible light.
So the "CMB" was initially a "Cosmic Visible Light Background", and indeed "space itself" was worse than a blast furnace at this point, because when you're surrounded on all sides by light of exactly a thermal spectrum and intensity, you are effectively within a thermal source at that temperature.
ADD: Thanks to the comment given below, the more accurate temperature is 3000 K. The wavelength is thus around 970 nm, which is the near infrared (NIR) band, but there will still be a noticeable tail in the visible light spectrum: this temperature is quite around that of a tungsten bulb filament.
edited May 4 at 7:30
answered May 4 at 2:10
The_SympathizerThe_Sympathizer
5,1591028
5,1591028
$begingroup$
The multiplier given in the other answer suggests it would be a peak of 174.6507THz (the CMB peak reaching us is at 169.23GHz,) this is quite a ways under the PHz range of visible light. Where did you get the equation and that 2.898*10^6 from?
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 3:54
$begingroup$
The Wien wavelength constant is tabulated at: physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?bwien and just converted to nanometer-kelvins as that's a more appropriately sized unit for these cases. Also, visible light is around 400-750 THz (IIRC). 1 PHz or above is UV light, not visible.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 4:16
$begingroup$
Ah, I screwed up the exponent when looking at it, it's 516.8835THz - still quite a ways from the 174.6507THz from the previous answer based on the observed CMB peak though (looks like that corresponds to 1716.5260nm.)
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 4:26
1
$begingroup$
It was about 3000 K rather than 5000. There are still a good amount of ions in a gas with a temperature of 5000 K. Light would have traveled a nice distance before being Thompson scattered by the time the universe had cooled to 5000 K. A nice distance isn't long enough. The universe had to cool to about 3000 K before light could essentially travel forever before being scattered.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
May 4 at 7:22
$begingroup$
@David Hammen : Thanks for added precision, I just pulled that number off the top of my head as a rough guesstimate. (Nonetheless, factor of 2 ain't so bad for astronomy :g:) At least then that gives a peak wavelength in the near infrared, and of about the same order of magnitude, so you still get a sizeable visible tail.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 7:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The multiplier given in the other answer suggests it would be a peak of 174.6507THz (the CMB peak reaching us is at 169.23GHz,) this is quite a ways under the PHz range of visible light. Where did you get the equation and that 2.898*10^6 from?
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 3:54
$begingroup$
The Wien wavelength constant is tabulated at: physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?bwien and just converted to nanometer-kelvins as that's a more appropriately sized unit for these cases. Also, visible light is around 400-750 THz (IIRC). 1 PHz or above is UV light, not visible.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 4:16
$begingroup$
Ah, I screwed up the exponent when looking at it, it's 516.8835THz - still quite a ways from the 174.6507THz from the previous answer based on the observed CMB peak though (looks like that corresponds to 1716.5260nm.)
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 4:26
1
$begingroup$
It was about 3000 K rather than 5000. There are still a good amount of ions in a gas with a temperature of 5000 K. Light would have traveled a nice distance before being Thompson scattered by the time the universe had cooled to 5000 K. A nice distance isn't long enough. The universe had to cool to about 3000 K before light could essentially travel forever before being scattered.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
May 4 at 7:22
$begingroup$
@David Hammen : Thanks for added precision, I just pulled that number off the top of my head as a rough guesstimate. (Nonetheless, factor of 2 ain't so bad for astronomy :g:) At least then that gives a peak wavelength in the near infrared, and of about the same order of magnitude, so you still get a sizeable visible tail.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 7:28
$begingroup$
The multiplier given in the other answer suggests it would be a peak of 174.6507THz (the CMB peak reaching us is at 169.23GHz,) this is quite a ways under the PHz range of visible light. Where did you get the equation and that 2.898*10^6 from?
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 3:54
$begingroup$
The multiplier given in the other answer suggests it would be a peak of 174.6507THz (the CMB peak reaching us is at 169.23GHz,) this is quite a ways under the PHz range of visible light. Where did you get the equation and that 2.898*10^6 from?
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 3:54
$begingroup$
The Wien wavelength constant is tabulated at: physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?bwien and just converted to nanometer-kelvins as that's a more appropriately sized unit for these cases. Also, visible light is around 400-750 THz (IIRC). 1 PHz or above is UV light, not visible.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 4:16
$begingroup$
The Wien wavelength constant is tabulated at: physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?bwien and just converted to nanometer-kelvins as that's a more appropriately sized unit for these cases. Also, visible light is around 400-750 THz (IIRC). 1 PHz or above is UV light, not visible.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 4:16
$begingroup$
Ah, I screwed up the exponent when looking at it, it's 516.8835THz - still quite a ways from the 174.6507THz from the previous answer based on the observed CMB peak though (looks like that corresponds to 1716.5260nm.)
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 4:26
$begingroup$
Ah, I screwed up the exponent when looking at it, it's 516.8835THz - still quite a ways from the 174.6507THz from the previous answer based on the observed CMB peak though (looks like that corresponds to 1716.5260nm.)
$endgroup$
– CoryG
May 4 at 4:26
1
1
$begingroup$
It was about 3000 K rather than 5000. There are still a good amount of ions in a gas with a temperature of 5000 K. Light would have traveled a nice distance before being Thompson scattered by the time the universe had cooled to 5000 K. A nice distance isn't long enough. The universe had to cool to about 3000 K before light could essentially travel forever before being scattered.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
May 4 at 7:22
$begingroup$
It was about 3000 K rather than 5000. There are still a good amount of ions in a gas with a temperature of 5000 K. Light would have traveled a nice distance before being Thompson scattered by the time the universe had cooled to 5000 K. A nice distance isn't long enough. The universe had to cool to about 3000 K before light could essentially travel forever before being scattered.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
May 4 at 7:22
$begingroup$
@David Hammen : Thanks for added precision, I just pulled that number off the top of my head as a rough guesstimate. (Nonetheless, factor of 2 ain't so bad for astronomy :g:) At least then that gives a peak wavelength in the near infrared, and of about the same order of magnitude, so you still get a sizeable visible tail.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 7:28
$begingroup$
@David Hammen : Thanks for added precision, I just pulled that number off the top of my head as a rough guesstimate. (Nonetheless, factor of 2 ain't so bad for astronomy :g:) At least then that gives a peak wavelength in the near infrared, and of about the same order of magnitude, so you still get a sizeable visible tail.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 4 at 7:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477758%2fwhat-wavelength-was-the-cmb-originally%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Related, possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/a/126133/44126
$endgroup$
– rob♦
May 4 at 1:21
$begingroup$
FWIW, you can see a sample of the colour at the bottom of Jim's answer physics.stackexchange.com/a/133943/123208
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
May 4 at 12:04