CaSO4 precipitate in mixture of Na2SO4 and CaCl2 solutionsIs solubility in Qsp affected by coefficient?How are solubilities of hydrate salts determined when competing equilibria are unavoidable?The behaviour of Ag3PO4 in solutionYellow precipitate in SnCl2 solutionFinding x and y in Pt(NH3)xClyPrecipitation reaction stoichiometry?How much calcium hydroxide will precipitate after addition of sodium hydroxide into saturated calcium hydroxide solution?Volume of NaOH needed to precipitate copper(II) but not calciumFinding mass percentage of components of a solid mixturePrecipitation of AgCl from the tap water solution of the group 2 chloride

Why do most published works in medical imaging try to reduce false positives?

Is neural networks training done one-by-one?

When and what was the first 3D acceleration device ever released?

How to respond to an upset student?

Employer asking for online access to bank account - Is this a scam?

Were pens caps holes designed to prevent death by suffocation if swallowed?

Are these reasonable traits for someone with autism?

Is real public IP Address hidden when using a system wide proxy in Windows 10?

Using credit/debit card details vs swiping a card in a payment (credit card) terminal

keyval - function for keyB should act dependent on value of keyA - how to do this?

Plot twist where the antagonist wins

Why is this Simple Puzzle impossible to solve?

Why does Mjolnir fall down in Age of Ultron but not in Endgame?

Why do airplanes use an axial flow jet engine instead of a more compact centrifugal jet engine?

Is "cool" appropriate or offensive to use in IMs?

Is the Indo-European language family made up?

Employer demanding to see degree after poor code review

Ticket to ride, 1910: What are the big cities

Use backslash or single-quotes for field separation

Text at the right of icon

Does the unit of measure matter when you are solving for the diameter of a circumference?

A steel cutting sword?

How to know if a folder is a symbolic link?

Popcorn is the only acceptable snack to consume while watching a movie



CaSO4 precipitate in mixture of Na2SO4 and CaCl2 solutions


Is solubility in Qsp affected by coefficient?How are solubilities of hydrate salts determined when competing equilibria are unavoidable?The behaviour of Ag3PO4 in solutionYellow precipitate in SnCl2 solutionFinding x and y in Pt(NH3)xClyPrecipitation reaction stoichiometry?How much calcium hydroxide will precipitate after addition of sodium hydroxide into saturated calcium hydroxide solution?Volume of NaOH needed to precipitate copper(II) but not calciumFinding mass percentage of components of a solid mixturePrecipitation of AgCl from the tap water solution of the group 2 chloride













4












$begingroup$


I have been stuck on a chemistry problem for a long time now and if anyone here can help me I would be eternally grateful.




40. Du tillsätter $pu100 ml$ $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning i $pu100 ml$ $pu0,02 M$ $ceCaCl2$-lösning. Det bildas en $ceCaSO4$-fällning. Hur mycket av $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning måste ännu tillsättas för att den bildade $ceCaSO4$-fällningen just och just ska upplösas helt? $K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2,5e-5 M$. $(t = pu25 °C)$ (2p)



a. $pu0,43 l$

b. $pu0,48 l$

c. $pu0,53 l$

d. $pu0,58 l$




Translation: We add 100 ml of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution to 100 ml of 0.02 M $ceCaCl2$-solution. A precipitate of $ceCaSO4$ is formed. What is the (minimal) volume of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution that needs to be added to the mix for the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate to be just dissolved completely?



The problem then lists the solubility constant, $K_mathrms$, for $ceCaSO4$ as $2.5cdot 10^-5$.



The only way I can think of solving this myself is by looking at the added $ceNa2SO4$-solution as just water and using the $K_mathrms$ value for $ceCaSO4$ to see what concentration of $ceCaSO4$ is possible in just water. Then calculate the amount of moles of precipitate that was actually formed to see how much water I would need to add to the mixture:



$$K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2.5e-5 M^2 = [ceCa^2+][ceSO4^2-]$$



$$therefore [ceCa^2+] = [ceSO4^2-] = sqrtpu2.5e-5 M^2 = pu5e-3 M$$



$$C = fracnV to n = CV$$



Amount of precipitate formed:



$$n(ceCaSO4) = pu0.02 M cdot pu0.1 dm^3 = pu0.002 mol$$



Required total volume of water to dissolve $pu0.002 mol$ of $ceCaSO4$:



$$V = fracnC = fracpu0.002 molpu5e-3 M = pu0.4 dm^3$$



This is wrong, but I can't figure out the right way to go about this. The answer surely has to do with how well $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved in a $ceNa2SO4$-solution as opposed to just water.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    I have been stuck on a chemistry problem for a long time now and if anyone here can help me I would be eternally grateful.




    40. Du tillsätter $pu100 ml$ $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning i $pu100 ml$ $pu0,02 M$ $ceCaCl2$-lösning. Det bildas en $ceCaSO4$-fällning. Hur mycket av $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning måste ännu tillsättas för att den bildade $ceCaSO4$-fällningen just och just ska upplösas helt? $K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2,5e-5 M$. $(t = pu25 °C)$ (2p)



    a. $pu0,43 l$

    b. $pu0,48 l$

    c. $pu0,53 l$

    d. $pu0,58 l$




    Translation: We add 100 ml of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution to 100 ml of 0.02 M $ceCaCl2$-solution. A precipitate of $ceCaSO4$ is formed. What is the (minimal) volume of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution that needs to be added to the mix for the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate to be just dissolved completely?



    The problem then lists the solubility constant, $K_mathrms$, for $ceCaSO4$ as $2.5cdot 10^-5$.



    The only way I can think of solving this myself is by looking at the added $ceNa2SO4$-solution as just water and using the $K_mathrms$ value for $ceCaSO4$ to see what concentration of $ceCaSO4$ is possible in just water. Then calculate the amount of moles of precipitate that was actually formed to see how much water I would need to add to the mixture:



    $$K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2.5e-5 M^2 = [ceCa^2+][ceSO4^2-]$$



    $$therefore [ceCa^2+] = [ceSO4^2-] = sqrtpu2.5e-5 M^2 = pu5e-3 M$$



    $$C = fracnV to n = CV$$



    Amount of precipitate formed:



    $$n(ceCaSO4) = pu0.02 M cdot pu0.1 dm^3 = pu0.002 mol$$



    Required total volume of water to dissolve $pu0.002 mol$ of $ceCaSO4$:



    $$V = fracnC = fracpu0.002 molpu5e-3 M = pu0.4 dm^3$$



    This is wrong, but I can't figure out the right way to go about this. The answer surely has to do with how well $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved in a $ceNa2SO4$-solution as opposed to just water.










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      I have been stuck on a chemistry problem for a long time now and if anyone here can help me I would be eternally grateful.




      40. Du tillsätter $pu100 ml$ $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning i $pu100 ml$ $pu0,02 M$ $ceCaCl2$-lösning. Det bildas en $ceCaSO4$-fällning. Hur mycket av $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning måste ännu tillsättas för att den bildade $ceCaSO4$-fällningen just och just ska upplösas helt? $K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2,5e-5 M$. $(t = pu25 °C)$ (2p)



      a. $pu0,43 l$

      b. $pu0,48 l$

      c. $pu0,53 l$

      d. $pu0,58 l$




      Translation: We add 100 ml of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution to 100 ml of 0.02 M $ceCaCl2$-solution. A precipitate of $ceCaSO4$ is formed. What is the (minimal) volume of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution that needs to be added to the mix for the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate to be just dissolved completely?



      The problem then lists the solubility constant, $K_mathrms$, for $ceCaSO4$ as $2.5cdot 10^-5$.



      The only way I can think of solving this myself is by looking at the added $ceNa2SO4$-solution as just water and using the $K_mathrms$ value for $ceCaSO4$ to see what concentration of $ceCaSO4$ is possible in just water. Then calculate the amount of moles of precipitate that was actually formed to see how much water I would need to add to the mixture:



      $$K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2.5e-5 M^2 = [ceCa^2+][ceSO4^2-]$$



      $$therefore [ceCa^2+] = [ceSO4^2-] = sqrtpu2.5e-5 M^2 = pu5e-3 M$$



      $$C = fracnV to n = CV$$



      Amount of precipitate formed:



      $$n(ceCaSO4) = pu0.02 M cdot pu0.1 dm^3 = pu0.002 mol$$



      Required total volume of water to dissolve $pu0.002 mol$ of $ceCaSO4$:



      $$V = fracnC = fracpu0.002 molpu5e-3 M = pu0.4 dm^3$$



      This is wrong, but I can't figure out the right way to go about this. The answer surely has to do with how well $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved in a $ceNa2SO4$-solution as opposed to just water.










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have been stuck on a chemistry problem for a long time now and if anyone here can help me I would be eternally grateful.




      40. Du tillsätter $pu100 ml$ $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning i $pu100 ml$ $pu0,02 M$ $ceCaCl2$-lösning. Det bildas en $ceCaSO4$-fällning. Hur mycket av $pu0,01 M$ $ceNa2SO4$-lösning måste ännu tillsättas för att den bildade $ceCaSO4$-fällningen just och just ska upplösas helt? $K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2,5e-5 M$. $(t = pu25 °C)$ (2p)



      a. $pu0,43 l$

      b. $pu0,48 l$

      c. $pu0,53 l$

      d. $pu0,58 l$




      Translation: We add 100 ml of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution to 100 ml of 0.02 M $ceCaCl2$-solution. A precipitate of $ceCaSO4$ is formed. What is the (minimal) volume of 0.01 M $ceNa2SO4$-solution that needs to be added to the mix for the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate to be just dissolved completely?



      The problem then lists the solubility constant, $K_mathrms$, for $ceCaSO4$ as $2.5cdot 10^-5$.



      The only way I can think of solving this myself is by looking at the added $ceNa2SO4$-solution as just water and using the $K_mathrms$ value for $ceCaSO4$ to see what concentration of $ceCaSO4$ is possible in just water. Then calculate the amount of moles of precipitate that was actually formed to see how much water I would need to add to the mixture:



      $$K_mathrms(ceCaSO4) = pu2.5e-5 M^2 = [ceCa^2+][ceSO4^2-]$$



      $$therefore [ceCa^2+] = [ceSO4^2-] = sqrtpu2.5e-5 M^2 = pu5e-3 M$$



      $$C = fracnV to n = CV$$



      Amount of precipitate formed:



      $$n(ceCaSO4) = pu0.02 M cdot pu0.1 dm^3 = pu0.002 mol$$



      Required total volume of water to dissolve $pu0.002 mol$ of $ceCaSO4$:



      $$V = fracnC = fracpu0.002 molpu5e-3 M = pu0.4 dm^3$$



      This is wrong, but I can't figure out the right way to go about this. The answer surely has to do with how well $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved in a $ceNa2SO4$-solution as opposed to just water.







      inorganic-chemistry solubility precipitation






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 13 at 15:06









      Karsten Theis

      6,3311048




      6,3311048










      asked May 13 at 6:19









      DumbstudentDumbstudent

      212




      212




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          As you've already noted, there are 3 substances of interest here: $ceCa^2+, ceSO4^2-, ceH2O$.



          Let $V$ be the additional volume of sodium sulfate solution. Then:



          The total volume is $V + 0.2 mathrmL$.



          The total amount of sulfate is $(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)$.



          The total amount of calcium is $(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)$.



          We have then the following relationship:



          $$ce[Ca^2+][SO4^2-]=frac(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLfrac(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLleq K_mathrmsp = 2.5times 10^-5$$



          Now, it's just algebra to solve for the threshold value of $V$, keeping in mind that there are two solutions for $V$ because this is a quadratic equation. In this case, the correct solution is the positive root:



          $$V approx 0.48 mathrmL$$



          The mistake you made is that the calcium and sulfate ion concentrations are definitely not equal, since the additional volume of solution contains only sulfate and not calcium.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            3












            $begingroup$

            When all of the $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved completely, all the calcium ions originate from the $pu100 mL ; ceCaCl2$ solution, so it is easy to determine the amount:



            $$n_ceCa^2+ = pu100 mL times 0.02 mol/L = 2 mmol$$



            To get the total sulfate amount, we have to consider what is present initially and what we add when we add a volume of $V_textadd$ of $ceNa2SO4$.



            $$n_ceSO4^2- = left(pu100 mL + V_textaddright) times pu0.01 mol/L$$



            From this, we can figure out the concentration:



            $$c_ceCa^2+ = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL $$



            $$c_ceSO4^2- = fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL $$



            The product has to be equal to $K_s$:



            $$K_s = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL times fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL$$



            This gives a quadratic equation for $V_textadd$, giving you the numeric result upon solving it. The answer will be approximate because it assumes that volumes are additive and that activities are independent of spectator ion concentrations.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
              $endgroup$
              – MaxW
              May 13 at 15:34






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
              $endgroup$
              – Karsten Theis
              May 13 at 15:45











            • $begingroup$
              Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
              $endgroup$
              – MaxW
              May 13 at 15:55











            • $begingroup$
              Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
              $endgroup$
              – Zhe
              May 13 at 17:12


















            3












            $begingroup$

            Goggle translate from Swedish yields a slightly different translation.




            You add $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution in $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution. A $ceCaSO4$ precipitate forms. How much of $pu0.01 M; ceNa2SO4$ solution has yet to be added to completely dissolve the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate formed? $K_mathrms ce(CaSO4) = pu2.5e−5 M. (t =pu25 ^circC)$




            The key point being that the problem is looking for the "extra" amount of the $ceNa2SO4$ solution to be added, not including the initial $pu100 ml$.



            To start let's convert the volumes to liters. So $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added to $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution.



            Let's let $V_e$ be the extra volume of the $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution, which needs to be added.



            We know that for the product of the final concentrations, $ce[Ca^2+]_f$ and $ce[SO4^2-]_f$, is equal to the $K_mathrmsp$.



            $K_mathrmsp = ce[Ca^2+]_f cdot [SO4^2-]_f $



            Now the amount of $ceCa^2+$ is $pu0.1 mol/L times pu0.02 L = pu0.002 mol$. There is $pu0.2 L$ of solution initially to which $V_e ; puL$ of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus,



            $ce[Ca^2+]_f = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e$



            The amount of $ceSO4^2-$ is $(0.1+V_e)times0.01$ moles. There is $0.2$ liters of solution initially to which $V_e$ liters of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is again $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus:



            $ce[SO4^2-]_f = dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$



            Now making the substitutions:



            $K_mathrmsp = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e times dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$



            Solving the quadratic equation yields $V_e approx pu0.483 L$






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "431"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115225%2fcaso4-precipitate-in-mixture-of-na2so4-and-cacl2-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3












              $begingroup$

              As you've already noted, there are 3 substances of interest here: $ceCa^2+, ceSO4^2-, ceH2O$.



              Let $V$ be the additional volume of sodium sulfate solution. Then:



              The total volume is $V + 0.2 mathrmL$.



              The total amount of sulfate is $(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)$.



              The total amount of calcium is $(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)$.



              We have then the following relationship:



              $$ce[Ca^2+][SO4^2-]=frac(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLfrac(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLleq K_mathrmsp = 2.5times 10^-5$$



              Now, it's just algebra to solve for the threshold value of $V$, keeping in mind that there are two solutions for $V$ because this is a quadratic equation. In this case, the correct solution is the positive root:



              $$V approx 0.48 mathrmL$$



              The mistake you made is that the calcium and sulfate ion concentrations are definitely not equal, since the additional volume of solution contains only sulfate and not calcium.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                As you've already noted, there are 3 substances of interest here: $ceCa^2+, ceSO4^2-, ceH2O$.



                Let $V$ be the additional volume of sodium sulfate solution. Then:



                The total volume is $V + 0.2 mathrmL$.



                The total amount of sulfate is $(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)$.



                The total amount of calcium is $(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)$.



                We have then the following relationship:



                $$ce[Ca^2+][SO4^2-]=frac(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLfrac(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLleq K_mathrmsp = 2.5times 10^-5$$



                Now, it's just algebra to solve for the threshold value of $V$, keeping in mind that there are two solutions for $V$ because this is a quadratic equation. In this case, the correct solution is the positive root:



                $$V approx 0.48 mathrmL$$



                The mistake you made is that the calcium and sulfate ion concentrations are definitely not equal, since the additional volume of solution contains only sulfate and not calcium.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  As you've already noted, there are 3 substances of interest here: $ceCa^2+, ceSO4^2-, ceH2O$.



                  Let $V$ be the additional volume of sodium sulfate solution. Then:



                  The total volume is $V + 0.2 mathrmL$.



                  The total amount of sulfate is $(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)$.



                  The total amount of calcium is $(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)$.



                  We have then the following relationship:



                  $$ce[Ca^2+][SO4^2-]=frac(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLfrac(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLleq K_mathrmsp = 2.5times 10^-5$$



                  Now, it's just algebra to solve for the threshold value of $V$, keeping in mind that there are two solutions for $V$ because this is a quadratic equation. In this case, the correct solution is the positive root:



                  $$V approx 0.48 mathrmL$$



                  The mistake you made is that the calcium and sulfate ion concentrations are definitely not equal, since the additional volume of solution contains only sulfate and not calcium.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  As you've already noted, there are 3 substances of interest here: $ceCa^2+, ceSO4^2-, ceH2O$.



                  Let $V$ be the additional volume of sodium sulfate solution. Then:



                  The total volume is $V + 0.2 mathrmL$.



                  The total amount of sulfate is $(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)$.



                  The total amount of calcium is $(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)$.



                  We have then the following relationship:



                  $$ce[Ca^2+][SO4^2-]=frac(0.1 mathrmL) (0.02 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLfrac(V + 0.1 mathrmL) (0.01 mathrmM)V + 0.2 mathrmLleq K_mathrmsp = 2.5times 10^-5$$



                  Now, it's just algebra to solve for the threshold value of $V$, keeping in mind that there are two solutions for $V$ because this is a quadratic equation. In this case, the correct solution is the positive root:



                  $$V approx 0.48 mathrmL$$



                  The mistake you made is that the calcium and sulfate ion concentrations are definitely not equal, since the additional volume of solution contains only sulfate and not calcium.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 13 at 15:19









                  ZheZhe

                  13.3k12754




                  13.3k12754





















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      When all of the $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved completely, all the calcium ions originate from the $pu100 mL ; ceCaCl2$ solution, so it is easy to determine the amount:



                      $$n_ceCa^2+ = pu100 mL times 0.02 mol/L = 2 mmol$$



                      To get the total sulfate amount, we have to consider what is present initially and what we add when we add a volume of $V_textadd$ of $ceNa2SO4$.



                      $$n_ceSO4^2- = left(pu100 mL + V_textaddright) times pu0.01 mol/L$$



                      From this, we can figure out the concentration:



                      $$c_ceCa^2+ = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL $$



                      $$c_ceSO4^2- = fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL $$



                      The product has to be equal to $K_s$:



                      $$K_s = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL times fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL$$



                      This gives a quadratic equation for $V_textadd$, giving you the numeric result upon solving it. The answer will be approximate because it assumes that volumes are additive and that activities are independent of spectator ion concentrations.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MaxW
                        May 13 at 15:34






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
                        $endgroup$
                        – Karsten Theis
                        May 13 at 15:45











                      • $begingroup$
                        Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MaxW
                        May 13 at 15:55











                      • $begingroup$
                        Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zhe
                        May 13 at 17:12















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      When all of the $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved completely, all the calcium ions originate from the $pu100 mL ; ceCaCl2$ solution, so it is easy to determine the amount:



                      $$n_ceCa^2+ = pu100 mL times 0.02 mol/L = 2 mmol$$



                      To get the total sulfate amount, we have to consider what is present initially and what we add when we add a volume of $V_textadd$ of $ceNa2SO4$.



                      $$n_ceSO4^2- = left(pu100 mL + V_textaddright) times pu0.01 mol/L$$



                      From this, we can figure out the concentration:



                      $$c_ceCa^2+ = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL $$



                      $$c_ceSO4^2- = fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL $$



                      The product has to be equal to $K_s$:



                      $$K_s = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL times fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL$$



                      This gives a quadratic equation for $V_textadd$, giving you the numeric result upon solving it. The answer will be approximate because it assumes that volumes are additive and that activities are independent of spectator ion concentrations.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MaxW
                        May 13 at 15:34






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
                        $endgroup$
                        – Karsten Theis
                        May 13 at 15:45











                      • $begingroup$
                        Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MaxW
                        May 13 at 15:55











                      • $begingroup$
                        Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zhe
                        May 13 at 17:12













                      3












                      3








                      3





                      $begingroup$

                      When all of the $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved completely, all the calcium ions originate from the $pu100 mL ; ceCaCl2$ solution, so it is easy to determine the amount:



                      $$n_ceCa^2+ = pu100 mL times 0.02 mol/L = 2 mmol$$



                      To get the total sulfate amount, we have to consider what is present initially and what we add when we add a volume of $V_textadd$ of $ceNa2SO4$.



                      $$n_ceSO4^2- = left(pu100 mL + V_textaddright) times pu0.01 mol/L$$



                      From this, we can figure out the concentration:



                      $$c_ceCa^2+ = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL $$



                      $$c_ceSO4^2- = fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL $$



                      The product has to be equal to $K_s$:



                      $$K_s = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL times fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL$$



                      This gives a quadratic equation for $V_textadd$, giving you the numeric result upon solving it. The answer will be approximate because it assumes that volumes are additive and that activities are independent of spectator ion concentrations.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      When all of the $ceCaSO4$ is dissolved completely, all the calcium ions originate from the $pu100 mL ; ceCaCl2$ solution, so it is easy to determine the amount:



                      $$n_ceCa^2+ = pu100 mL times 0.02 mol/L = 2 mmol$$



                      To get the total sulfate amount, we have to consider what is present initially and what we add when we add a volume of $V_textadd$ of $ceNa2SO4$.



                      $$n_ceSO4^2- = left(pu100 mL + V_textaddright) times pu0.01 mol/L$$



                      From this, we can figure out the concentration:



                      $$c_ceCa^2+ = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL $$



                      $$c_ceSO4^2- = fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL $$



                      The product has to be equal to $K_s$:



                      $$K_s = fracpu2 mmol V_textadd +pu200 mL times fracpu(100 mL + V_textadd) times pu0.01 mol/L V_textadd +pu200 mL$$



                      This gives a quadratic equation for $V_textadd$, giving you the numeric result upon solving it. The answer will be approximate because it assumes that volumes are additive and that activities are independent of spectator ion concentrations.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited May 13 at 17:51









                      Mathew Mahindaratne

                      7,9941131




                      7,9941131










                      answered May 13 at 15:23









                      Karsten TheisKarsten Theis

                      6,3311048




                      6,3311048







                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MaxW
                        May 13 at 15:34






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
                        $endgroup$
                        – Karsten Theis
                        May 13 at 15:45











                      • $begingroup$
                        Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MaxW
                        May 13 at 15:55











                      • $begingroup$
                        Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zhe
                        May 13 at 17:12












                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MaxW
                        May 13 at 15:34






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
                        $endgroup$
                        – Karsten Theis
                        May 13 at 15:45











                      • $begingroup$
                        Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
                        $endgroup$
                        – MaxW
                        May 13 at 15:55











                      • $begingroup$
                        Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Zhe
                        May 13 at 17:12







                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
                      $endgroup$
                      – MaxW
                      May 13 at 15:34




                      $begingroup$
                      I like the fact that you added to two caveats that make the answer approximate. We don't explicitly state the assumptions frequently enough here.
                      $endgroup$
                      – MaxW
                      May 13 at 15:34




                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
                      $endgroup$
                      – Karsten Theis
                      May 13 at 15:45





                      $begingroup$
                      This is an exercise where I see a mismatch between the level of description of the chemistry and the level of math required to solve it. You might learn more chemistry if the question had been "What volume 10 mM $ceNa2SO4$would it take to dissolve 2 mmol $ceCaSO4$? Compare that to the volume of pure water it would take to dissolve the same amount of calcium sulfate."
                      $endgroup$
                      – Karsten Theis
                      May 13 at 15:45













                      $begingroup$
                      Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
                      $endgroup$
                      – MaxW
                      May 13 at 15:55





                      $begingroup$
                      Nice observation, I agree. The chemistry problem is buried under so much math that any appreciation of the chemistry is lost. Students really need the problems to reinforce the chemistry so they can develop better chemical intuition.
                      $endgroup$
                      – MaxW
                      May 13 at 15:55













                      $begingroup$
                      Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Zhe
                      May 13 at 17:12




                      $begingroup$
                      Totally agree with @MaxW on the assumptions. Nice response. Agreed on the other comment as well. This would we a nicer problem as: (1) set up the equilibrium expression in terms of the added volume $V$ and (2) state any assumptions.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Zhe
                      May 13 at 17:12











                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Goggle translate from Swedish yields a slightly different translation.




                      You add $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution in $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution. A $ceCaSO4$ precipitate forms. How much of $pu0.01 M; ceNa2SO4$ solution has yet to be added to completely dissolve the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate formed? $K_mathrms ce(CaSO4) = pu2.5e−5 M. (t =pu25 ^circC)$




                      The key point being that the problem is looking for the "extra" amount of the $ceNa2SO4$ solution to be added, not including the initial $pu100 ml$.



                      To start let's convert the volumes to liters. So $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added to $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution.



                      Let's let $V_e$ be the extra volume of the $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution, which needs to be added.



                      We know that for the product of the final concentrations, $ce[Ca^2+]_f$ and $ce[SO4^2-]_f$, is equal to the $K_mathrmsp$.



                      $K_mathrmsp = ce[Ca^2+]_f cdot [SO4^2-]_f $



                      Now the amount of $ceCa^2+$ is $pu0.1 mol/L times pu0.02 L = pu0.002 mol$. There is $pu0.2 L$ of solution initially to which $V_e ; puL$ of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus,



                      $ce[Ca^2+]_f = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e$



                      The amount of $ceSO4^2-$ is $(0.1+V_e)times0.01$ moles. There is $0.2$ liters of solution initially to which $V_e$ liters of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is again $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus:



                      $ce[SO4^2-]_f = dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$



                      Now making the substitutions:



                      $K_mathrmsp = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e times dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$



                      Solving the quadratic equation yields $V_e approx pu0.483 L$






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$

















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        Goggle translate from Swedish yields a slightly different translation.




                        You add $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution in $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution. A $ceCaSO4$ precipitate forms. How much of $pu0.01 M; ceNa2SO4$ solution has yet to be added to completely dissolve the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate formed? $K_mathrms ce(CaSO4) = pu2.5e−5 M. (t =pu25 ^circC)$




                        The key point being that the problem is looking for the "extra" amount of the $ceNa2SO4$ solution to be added, not including the initial $pu100 ml$.



                        To start let's convert the volumes to liters. So $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added to $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution.



                        Let's let $V_e$ be the extra volume of the $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution, which needs to be added.



                        We know that for the product of the final concentrations, $ce[Ca^2+]_f$ and $ce[SO4^2-]_f$, is equal to the $K_mathrmsp$.



                        $K_mathrmsp = ce[Ca^2+]_f cdot [SO4^2-]_f $



                        Now the amount of $ceCa^2+$ is $pu0.1 mol/L times pu0.02 L = pu0.002 mol$. There is $pu0.2 L$ of solution initially to which $V_e ; puL$ of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus,



                        $ce[Ca^2+]_f = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e$



                        The amount of $ceSO4^2-$ is $(0.1+V_e)times0.01$ moles. There is $0.2$ liters of solution initially to which $V_e$ liters of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is again $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus:



                        $ce[SO4^2-]_f = dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$



                        Now making the substitutions:



                        $K_mathrmsp = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e times dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$



                        Solving the quadratic equation yields $V_e approx pu0.483 L$






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$















                          3












                          3








                          3





                          $begingroup$

                          Goggle translate from Swedish yields a slightly different translation.




                          You add $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution in $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution. A $ceCaSO4$ precipitate forms. How much of $pu0.01 M; ceNa2SO4$ solution has yet to be added to completely dissolve the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate formed? $K_mathrms ce(CaSO4) = pu2.5e−5 M. (t =pu25 ^circC)$




                          The key point being that the problem is looking for the "extra" amount of the $ceNa2SO4$ solution to be added, not including the initial $pu100 ml$.



                          To start let's convert the volumes to liters. So $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added to $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution.



                          Let's let $V_e$ be the extra volume of the $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution, which needs to be added.



                          We know that for the product of the final concentrations, $ce[Ca^2+]_f$ and $ce[SO4^2-]_f$, is equal to the $K_mathrmsp$.



                          $K_mathrmsp = ce[Ca^2+]_f cdot [SO4^2-]_f $



                          Now the amount of $ceCa^2+$ is $pu0.1 mol/L times pu0.02 L = pu0.002 mol$. There is $pu0.2 L$ of solution initially to which $V_e ; puL$ of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus,



                          $ce[Ca^2+]_f = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e$



                          The amount of $ceSO4^2-$ is $(0.1+V_e)times0.01$ moles. There is $0.2$ liters of solution initially to which $V_e$ liters of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is again $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus:



                          $ce[SO4^2-]_f = dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$



                          Now making the substitutions:



                          $K_mathrmsp = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e times dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$



                          Solving the quadratic equation yields $V_e approx pu0.483 L$






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          Goggle translate from Swedish yields a slightly different translation.




                          You add $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution in $pu100 ml$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution. A $ceCaSO4$ precipitate forms. How much of $pu0.01 M; ceNa2SO4$ solution has yet to be added to completely dissolve the $ceCaSO4$ precipitate formed? $K_mathrms ce(CaSO4) = pu2.5e−5 M. (t =pu25 ^circC)$




                          The key point being that the problem is looking for the "extra" amount of the $ceNa2SO4$ solution to be added, not including the initial $pu100 ml$.



                          To start let's convert the volumes to liters. So $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added to $pu0.100 L$ of $pu0.02 M ; ceCaCl2$ solution.



                          Let's let $V_e$ be the extra volume of the $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution, which needs to be added.



                          We know that for the product of the final concentrations, $ce[Ca^2+]_f$ and $ce[SO4^2-]_f$, is equal to the $K_mathrmsp$.



                          $K_mathrmsp = ce[Ca^2+]_f cdot [SO4^2-]_f $



                          Now the amount of $ceCa^2+$ is $pu0.1 mol/L times pu0.02 L = pu0.002 mol$. There is $pu0.2 L$ of solution initially to which $V_e ; puL$ of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus,



                          $ce[Ca^2+]_f = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e$



                          The amount of $ceSO4^2-$ is $(0.1+V_e)times0.01$ moles. There is $0.2$ liters of solution initially to which $V_e$ liters of additional $pu0.01 M ; ceNa2SO4$ solution is added. So the final volume is again $left(0.2 + V_eright)$ liters. Thus:



                          $ce[SO4^2-]_f = dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$



                          Now making the substitutions:



                          $K_mathrmsp = dfrac0.0020.2+V_e times dfrac(0.1+V_e)times0.010.2+V_e$



                          Solving the quadratic equation yields $V_e approx pu0.483 L$







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited May 13 at 18:18









                          Mathew Mahindaratne

                          7,9941131




                          7,9941131










                          answered May 13 at 15:29









                          MaxWMaxW

                          16.3k22363




                          16.3k22363



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115225%2fcaso4-precipitate-in-mixture-of-na2so4-and-cacl2-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                              Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                              Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020