Why didn't the Avengers use this object earlier?How does the plan in the final battle solve the problem of Thanos?Why don't Black Widow and Hawkeye have their own movie?In The Avengers (2012), How did they communicate at the climax without any ear device even though the inner ear technology was created in 2013?Why did Steve Rogers stop using guns?Would the Ancient One have defended the Earth from a Chitauri invasion in the Avengers absence?Did the UN Council have to approve Iron Man's actions in Spider-Man: Homecoming?Why did the Ultron bots flee?How could this character be mortally wounded?Is Thanos immortal?In Avengers: Infinity War, what did Dr. Strange need to do to ensure the outcome in Endgame?How fast can Captain Marvel travel in Endgame?

What is quasi-aromaticity?

Is the Starlink array really visible from Earth?

What is the object moving across the ceiling in this stock footage?

Adding spaces to string based on list

Flying domestically in the US, is my State Issued ID all I need to get past security?

Count rotary dial pulses in a phone number (including letters)

align* environment issues

Is real public IP Address hidden when using a system wide proxy in Windows 10?

Line of lights moving in a straight line , with a few following

Website returning plaintext password

Is "cool" appropriate or offensive to use in IMs?

Why do airplanes use an axial flow jet engine instead of a more compact centrifugal jet engine?

Employer demanding to see degree after poor code review

Employer asking for online access to bank account - Is this a scam?

What to do when you've set the wrong ISO for your film?

Are these reasonable traits for someone with autism?

Looking for a soft substance that doesn't dissolve underwater

Compactness of finite sets

Why does Mjolnir fall down in Age of Ultron but not in Endgame?

Is there some hidden joke behind the "it's never lupus" running gag in House?

Ticket to ride, 1910: What are the big cities

Should breaking down something like a door be adjudicated as an attempt to beat its AC and HP, or as an ability check against a set DC?

How should I introduce map drawing to my players?

Why were helmets and other body armour not commonplace in the 1800s?



Why didn't the Avengers use this object earlier?


How does the plan in the final battle solve the problem of Thanos?Why don't Black Widow and Hawkeye have their own movie?In The Avengers (2012), How did they communicate at the climax without any ear device even though the inner ear technology was created in 2013?Why did Steve Rogers stop using guns?Would the Ancient One have defended the Earth from a Chitauri invasion in the Avengers absence?Did the UN Council have to approve Iron Man's actions in Spider-Man: Homecoming?Why did the Ultron bots flee?How could this character be mortally wounded?Is Thanos immortal?In Avengers: Infinity War, what did Dr. Strange need to do to ensure the outcome in Endgame?How fast can Captain Marvel travel in Endgame?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








20















In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?










share|improve this question



















  • 8





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    May 13 at 3:28






  • 13





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    May 13 at 3:29






  • 13





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    May 13 at 10:52






  • 11





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 13:00






  • 3





    @TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

    – user
    May 13 at 13:29

















20















In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?










share|improve this question



















  • 8





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    May 13 at 3:28






  • 13





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    May 13 at 3:29






  • 13





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    May 13 at 10:52






  • 11





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 13:00






  • 3





    @TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

    – user
    May 13 at 13:29













20












20








20








In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?










share|improve this question
















In Avengers: Endgame, why did they not




use the Gauntlet earlier in the final battle to kill Thanos and his army?




Hawkeye had it, Spider-Man had it, Black Panther had it, and Captain Marvel had it. Any one of them could have used the it to end the battle much as Tony did.



By delaying, many more people died in the battle that could have been saved by ending the battle sooner. Is there a reason for this?







marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 13 at 19:35









I N T E R E S T I N G

1,408431




1,408431










asked May 13 at 3:23









chessprogrammerchessprogrammer

212115




212115







  • 8





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    May 13 at 3:28






  • 13





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    May 13 at 3:29






  • 13





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    May 13 at 10:52






  • 11





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 13:00






  • 3





    @TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

    – user
    May 13 at 13:29












  • 8





    We don't trade lives.

    – gowenfawr
    May 13 at 3:28






  • 13





    Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

    – chessprogrammer
    May 13 at 3:29






  • 13





    There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

    – user
    May 13 at 10:52






  • 11





    @user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 13:00






  • 3





    @TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

    – user
    May 13 at 13:29







8




8





We don't trade lives.

– gowenfawr
May 13 at 3:28





We don't trade lives.

– gowenfawr
May 13 at 3:28




13




13





Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

– chessprogrammer
May 13 at 3:29





Its possible Captain Marvel could have done it without dying

– chessprogrammer
May 13 at 3:29




13




13





There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

– user
May 13 at 10:52





There are many plot holes... Like why didn't Captain Marvel just fly off into space with it as soon as possible?

– user
May 13 at 10:52




11




11





@user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

– TheLethalCarrot
May 13 at 13:00





@user That is not a plot hole, it might be poor writing or an odd in universe decision by the characters but it most certainly is not a plot hole. And in either case it is easily explained by that they were trying to get the Gauntlet to the quantum tunnel in the van.

– TheLethalCarrot
May 13 at 13:00




3




3





@TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

– user
May 13 at 13:29





@TheLethalCarrot but why did it have to go to the quantum tunnel right then? Take it off into space, finish off Thanos and then build another quantum tunnel if that one gets trashed.

– user
May 13 at 13:29










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















26














It didn't fit



The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



It didn't occur to them



It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



They didn't know that they could



Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






share|improve this answer




















  • 10





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    May 13 at 4:45






  • 2





    I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    May 13 at 16:39


















58














Because that was never the plan



The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



Avengers: Endgame







share|improve this answer




















  • 13





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    May 13 at 12:44











  • I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

    – Thunderforge
    May 13 at 15:26











  • @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 15:28











  • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    May 13 at 22:35











  • @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 14 at 6:16


















21














Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



  • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


  • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


  • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


  • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






share|improve this answer




















  • 15





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    May 13 at 7:38











  • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    May 13 at 8:23






  • 13





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    May 13 at 10:47






  • 2





    @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    May 13 at 13:58






  • 1





    You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:44


















8















Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 14:32











  • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 15:05






  • 3





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:18






  • 1





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 20:21






  • 2





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:29


















1














Setting aside the physical resilience required to use the gauntlet, magic in the MCU has always been a matter of intelligence, focus, and willpower - see Doctor Strange. Even if you follow the theory that the stones are able to read the intent of the user, it's likely that only a very small number of people on that battlefield could summon the presence of mind to command the gauntlet, especially while their body is being ravaged by its raw power.



Edit - the Gauntlet's magic being directly akin to sorcery is only my conjecture, based off of similar requirements for hand gestures (clicks, clenches, waves) and the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto as either a source of dimensional energy or harnessed for its powers directly.






share|improve this answer

























  • Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:46











  • The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

    – Christopher Vella
    May 16 at 13:49


















0














Because it would kill them



This is the entire theme of the Infinity War story. The good guys don't want to make sacrifices. They will not make plans that would send someone to their death. They say as much I think in Infinity War. When someone has to be sacrificed for the soul stone they have to fight each other because neither is willing to lose the other one. They are not ready to give up their lives to win. They are not ready to put survivor guilt on their friends.



Thanos does not have this problem. He, without any thought, sacrifices Gamora. This is why Thanos wins, and the Avengers lose the first time. In the final moment Tony sees this. He realizes that sacrifices must be made, and he gives up his life. This completes the narrative tragedy of the Avengers.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212300%2fwhy-didnt-the-avengers-use-this-object-earlier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    26














    It didn't fit



    The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



    It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



    It didn't occur to them



    It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



    They didn't know that they could



    Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



    Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 10





      Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

      – Nathan K.
      May 13 at 4:45






    • 2





      I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

      – Moacir
      May 13 at 16:39















    26














    It didn't fit



    The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



    It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



    It didn't occur to them



    It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



    They didn't know that they could



    Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



    Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 10





      Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

      – Nathan K.
      May 13 at 4:45






    • 2





      I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

      – Moacir
      May 13 at 16:39













    26












    26








    26







    It didn't fit



    The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



    It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



    It didn't occur to them



    It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



    They didn't know that they could



    Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



    Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.






    share|improve this answer















    It didn't fit



    The Gauntlet altered its size to fit the Hulk's hand. It's possible that it was designed to resize itself for whomever tried to wear it, but it's more likely that Tony was directing the shift using his mental control over his nano-machine suits. If that's the case, then there's no way for anyone who isn't Hulk sized to put the gauntlet on until Tony can get there to resize it.



    It's also possible that the power surge from the Stones shorted out the Gauntlet's reshaping capabilities. We never see it do anything other than mechanical movement until after Tony comes into contact with it at the very end (and even then it's not clear whether he was interfacing with it directly or using parts of his current suit to steal from the Gauntlet).



    It didn't occur to them



    It's very easy to get tunnel vision during high stress situations. Nobody who had their hands on the gauntlet had much time to think critically - they were too busy fighting for their lives. Once it was established that it was vital to return the Stones to their own times, it simply didn't occur to them that the Stones could be used for a different purpose.



    They didn't know that they could



    Thanos snapped his fingers and killed half the universe. Does that mean that you can snap your fingers and kill a specific group of people? Is there like a dial you have to turn from the "kill half of everything" setting to the "kill the bad guys, but nobody else" setting? Tony has a much better idea about how to control the Gauntlet and use it for his own purposes than most of the heroes who were trying to transport it.



    Also, Spider-Man at least (and probably a few of the others) didn't have the stomach to murder an entire army with a finger-snap, even if it would save lives. This isn't universal though, so it doesn't get a header.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 13 at 5:49









    Jenayah

    25.3k8117155




    25.3k8117155










    answered May 13 at 4:29









    Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

    3,3531127




    3,3531127







    • 10





      Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

      – Nathan K.
      May 13 at 4:45






    • 2





      I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

      – Moacir
      May 13 at 16:39












    • 10





      Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

      – Nathan K.
      May 13 at 4:45






    • 2





      I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

      – Moacir
      May 13 at 16:39







    10




    10





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    May 13 at 4:45





    Good points. Also, Plan A at that point was to get the Infinity Stones back into the past using the quantum tunnel in Scott Lang's van. Only after Thanos destroyed the van did it become necessary to use the gauntlet to destroy Thanos in order to prevent him from using it.

    – Nathan K.
    May 13 at 4:45




    2




    2





    I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    May 13 at 16:39





    I have a theory that Tony had the idea to remove the stones by seeing Thanos removing the power stone to punch Captain Marvel. There wasn't enough time to explain to anyone, so that's why he did it, knowing he would die (Because of the 1 signal Dr. Strange did).

    – Moacir
    May 13 at 16:39













    58














    Because that was never the plan



    The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




    HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



    CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



    HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



    IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



    ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



    VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



    IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



    ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



    IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



    Avengers: Endgame







    share|improve this answer




















    • 13





      Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

      – Matthieu M.
      May 13 at 12:44











    • I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

      – Thunderforge
      May 13 at 15:26











    • @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 15:28











    • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

      – Jacob C.
      May 13 at 22:35











    • @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 14 at 6:16















    58














    Because that was never the plan



    The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




    HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



    CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



    HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



    IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



    ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



    VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



    IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



    ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



    IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



    Avengers: Endgame







    share|improve this answer




















    • 13





      Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

      – Matthieu M.
      May 13 at 12:44











    • I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

      – Thunderforge
      May 13 at 15:26











    • @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 15:28











    • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

      – Jacob C.
      May 13 at 22:35











    • @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 14 at 6:16













    58












    58








    58







    Because that was never the plan



    The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




    HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



    CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



    HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



    IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



    ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



    VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



    IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



    ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



    IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



    Avengers: Endgame







    share|improve this answer















    Because that was never the plan



    The plan was actually to get the Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones to the quantum tunnel in the van and use that to put the Stones back into their respective timelines. The plan only changed for the Tony snap when Thanos destroyed the van and Tony had to improvise.




    HAWKEYE: Cap, what do you want me to do with this damn thing?



    CAPTAIN AMERICA: Get those stones as far away as possible!



    HULK: No! We need to get them back where they came from.



    IRON MAN: No way to get them back. Thanos destroyed the quantum tunnel.



    ANT-MAN: Hold on! That wasn't our only time machine. Anyone see an ugly brown van up there?



    VALKYRIE: Yes! But you're not gonna like where it's parked.



    IRON MAN: Scott, how long you need to get that thing working?



    ANT-MAN: Maybe ten minutes.



    IRON MAN: Get it started. We'll get the stones to you.



    Avengers: Endgame








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 13 at 18:28









    Community

    1




    1










    answered May 13 at 10:02









    TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot

    60.4k26396443




    60.4k26396443







    • 13





      Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

      – Matthieu M.
      May 13 at 12:44











    • I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

      – Thunderforge
      May 13 at 15:26











    • @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 15:28











    • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

      – Jacob C.
      May 13 at 22:35











    • @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 14 at 6:16












    • 13





      Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

      – Matthieu M.
      May 13 at 12:44











    • I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

      – Thunderforge
      May 13 at 15:26











    • @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 15:28











    • While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

      – Jacob C.
      May 13 at 22:35











    • @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 14 at 6:16







    13




    13





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    May 13 at 12:44





    Remembering that Doctor Strange saw all this happening, you have to wonder if he saw any future in which another character such as Star-Lord or Captain Marvel tried and failed.

    – Matthieu M.
    May 13 at 12:44













    I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

    – Thunderforge
    May 13 at 15:26





    I'm finding the dialogue a bit hard to follow since there's multiple characters involved. Could you please add who is saying what?

    – Thunderforge
    May 13 at 15:26













    @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 15:28





    @Thunderforge I grabbed the dialogue off of the subtitles and the current annotated transcript isn't that far down yet. It's been a while since I've seen it so can't remember exactly who says what, just know that each new line is a new character... I believe.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 15:28













    While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    May 13 at 22:35





    While true, this arguably a tautological answer, as the question essentially asks "why didn't it become the plan?" As the question notes, the plan was altered; the question asks why it wasn't altered sooner. (Presumably they did not expect returning the stones to wipe away the intrusion of Thanos and his forces, as that would not be consistent with how the film treated causality.)

    – Jacob C.
    May 13 at 22:35













    @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 14 at 6:16





    @JacobC. Considering they thought the alternate reality where the enemies we’re from would cease to exist they actually probably thought exactly that.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 14 at 6:16











    21














    Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



    • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


    • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


    • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


    • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


    What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



    He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



    Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 15





      I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

      – GordonBennett
      May 13 at 7:38











    • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

      – Stark07
      May 13 at 8:23






    • 13





      Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

      – user
      May 13 at 10:47






    • 2





      @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

      – Daniel R. Collins
      May 13 at 13:58






    • 1





      You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:44















    21














    Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



    • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


    • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


    • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


    • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


    What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



    He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



    Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 15





      I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

      – GordonBennett
      May 13 at 7:38











    • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

      – Stark07
      May 13 at 8:23






    • 13





      Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

      – user
      May 13 at 10:47






    • 2





      @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

      – Daniel R. Collins
      May 13 at 13:58






    • 1





      You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:44













    21












    21








    21







    Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



    • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


    • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


    • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


    • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


    What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



    He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



    Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.






    share|improve this answer















    Let's see who all had the gauntlet:



    • Hawkeye: He had personally seen what the Gauntlet did to Hulk. He was definitely not going to survive using the Gauntlet, and he knew it.


    • T'Challa: He had barely seen the Gauntlet just once. He had no clue as to what it was.


    • Spider-Man: He was a kid, just back from the dead, and teleported to that location. He was in no condition to make the decision.


    • Marvel: While she could have wielded it, she too had no clue what it was. From her perspective it was merely a Gauntlet to be returned to the van.


    What Tony did in the end, was out of desperation. They were losing. Unable to contain Thanos and his forces. He saw Thor and Cap try and fail. He saw Marvel try and fail.



    He knew he had to do something big. That desperation, combined with the fact that he designed the Gauntlet at least in part gave him the confidence to at least try using it.



    Extended speculation: Outside of all this, I think the Iron Gauntlet was completely fried from its first use, and lost its ability to shrink back to normal size. No human-sized hand could have fit in it, much less be able to use it.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 13 at 5:50









    Jenayah

    25.3k8117155




    25.3k8117155










    answered May 13 at 5:20









    Stark07Stark07

    12.8k755106




    12.8k755106







    • 15





      I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

      – GordonBennett
      May 13 at 7:38











    • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

      – Stark07
      May 13 at 8:23






    • 13





      Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

      – user
      May 13 at 10:47






    • 2





      @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

      – Daniel R. Collins
      May 13 at 13:58






    • 1





      You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:44












    • 15





      I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

      – GordonBennett
      May 13 at 7:38











    • I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

      – Stark07
      May 13 at 8:23






    • 13





      Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

      – user
      May 13 at 10:47






    • 2





      @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

      – Daniel R. Collins
      May 13 at 13:58






    • 1





      You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:44







    15




    15





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    May 13 at 7:38





    I'm disagree on Marvel, there's no way they went 5 years without discussing what an infinity gauntlet was.

    – GordonBennett
    May 13 at 7:38













    I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    May 13 at 8:23





    I believe that she was the only one of the lot who hadn't faced it directly. Besides, the mission was to get it to Scott, and she was following it.

    – Stark07
    May 13 at 8:23




    13




    13





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    May 13 at 10:47





    Hawkeye seemed willing to sacrifice himself earlier to get one of the stones, so I'm not sure risking using the gauntlet to stop the battle would have been a stretch for him. Also there was a good chance any of them would have died anyway had it not been used.

    – user
    May 13 at 10:47




    2




    2





    @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    May 13 at 13:58





    @user: It's possible that after the loss of Natasha, Hawkeye's attitude about that took a radical shift.

    – Daniel R. Collins
    May 13 at 13:58




    1




    1





    You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:44





    You forget that Captain Marvel was there when they killed the Thanos that did the snap, including when Thor cut off his arm w/the gauntlet. She definitely knew what was going on.

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:44











    8















    Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




    Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



    Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




    Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



    A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



    'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 14:32











    • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 15:05






    • 3





      Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:18






    • 1





      @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 20:21






    • 2





      The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:29















    8















    Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




    Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



    Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




    Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



    A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



    'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 14:32











    • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 15:05






    • 3





      Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:18






    • 1





      @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 20:21






    • 2





      The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:29













    8












    8








    8








    Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




    Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



    Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




    Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



    A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



    'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019







    share|improve this answer














    Any one of them could have used the Gauntlet to end the battle much as Tony did.




    Actually, no... As I wrote in my answer to Why didn't other heroes use the Gauntlet while they were playing catch with it? on Movies.SE, there's an interview confirming that basically, only Hulk (and Tony) could do it. You have to remember that the Gauntlet is equipped with all six Stones at that point, which is a whole lot to handle. Even Captain Marvel might not have been able too, and she's easily in the top 3 of overpowered people in the MCU.



    Sure, that interview only talks about the "final" snap, but it's probably valid for partial actions as well - in the heat of the battlefield, you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone... Sounds like a nice way to lose one, which would jeopardize the overall plan of "in the end, use all six and unsnap".




    Q: Why Iron Man has to be the one to do the final snap, couldn’t the people like Thor, Star-Lord or Captain Marvel whom all previously have handled the power of Infinity Stones done it instead?



    A: Thor in this movie couldn’t do it, only Hulk was strong enough to do the snap without dying. We are still not sure whether Captain Marvel can also withstand all the power of Infinity Stones at once. The reason we choose to let Iron Man do it in the end was because he was the closest one to Thanos at the time. In all the futures Doctor Strange foresee, Iron Man was the only one who could get close to Thanos and do the snap.



    'Avengers: Endgame’ directors just explained some of the movie’s biggest mysteries, BGR, April 30th, 2019








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered May 13 at 5:53









    JenayahJenayah

    25.3k8117155




    25.3k8117155







    • 3





      "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 14:32











    • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 15:05






    • 3





      Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:18






    • 1





      @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 20:21






    • 2





      The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:29












    • 3





      "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

      – TheLethalCarrot
      May 13 at 14:32











    • @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 15:05






    • 3





      Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:18






    • 1





      @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

      – Jenayah
      May 13 at 20:21






    • 2





      The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

      – Nolimon
      May 13 at 20:29







    3




    3





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 14:32





    "you won't stop to take a Stone off (to "ease" the manipulation for instance), fire part of a power, reslot the Stone" someone should have told Thanos that when he smacked Carol in the face with the full force of the Power Stone.

    – TheLethalCarrot
    May 13 at 14:32













    @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 15:05





    @TheLethalCarrot disagreed. Thanos can sustain the Power Stone, even if briefly, but I doubt Hawkeye could

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 15:05




    3




    3





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:18





    Why does this mean no other character was capable of snapping? The quote establishes they'd die, but the question is why they couldn't do the same thing Tony did, which includes dying.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:18




    1




    1





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 20:21





    @Nolimon the way I read it, it means they'd die before even snapping.

    – Jenayah
    May 13 at 20:21




    2




    2





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:29





    The quote says "do the snap without dying", not wear the Gauntlet. If it would kill Captain Marvel before she could complete it, why can Iron Man go through with it? The quote doesn't give any reason he's more resistant than anyone else.

    – Nolimon
    May 13 at 20:29











    1














    Setting aside the physical resilience required to use the gauntlet, magic in the MCU has always been a matter of intelligence, focus, and willpower - see Doctor Strange. Even if you follow the theory that the stones are able to read the intent of the user, it's likely that only a very small number of people on that battlefield could summon the presence of mind to command the gauntlet, especially while their body is being ravaged by its raw power.



    Edit - the Gauntlet's magic being directly akin to sorcery is only my conjecture, based off of similar requirements for hand gestures (clicks, clenches, waves) and the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto as either a source of dimensional energy or harnessed for its powers directly.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:46











    • The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

      – Christopher Vella
      May 16 at 13:49















    1














    Setting aside the physical resilience required to use the gauntlet, magic in the MCU has always been a matter of intelligence, focus, and willpower - see Doctor Strange. Even if you follow the theory that the stones are able to read the intent of the user, it's likely that only a very small number of people on that battlefield could summon the presence of mind to command the gauntlet, especially while their body is being ravaged by its raw power.



    Edit - the Gauntlet's magic being directly akin to sorcery is only my conjecture, based off of similar requirements for hand gestures (clicks, clenches, waves) and the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto as either a source of dimensional energy or harnessed for its powers directly.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:46











    • The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

      – Christopher Vella
      May 16 at 13:49













    1












    1








    1







    Setting aside the physical resilience required to use the gauntlet, magic in the MCU has always been a matter of intelligence, focus, and willpower - see Doctor Strange. Even if you follow the theory that the stones are able to read the intent of the user, it's likely that only a very small number of people on that battlefield could summon the presence of mind to command the gauntlet, especially while their body is being ravaged by its raw power.



    Edit - the Gauntlet's magic being directly akin to sorcery is only my conjecture, based off of similar requirements for hand gestures (clicks, clenches, waves) and the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto as either a source of dimensional energy or harnessed for its powers directly.






    share|improve this answer















    Setting aside the physical resilience required to use the gauntlet, magic in the MCU has always been a matter of intelligence, focus, and willpower - see Doctor Strange. Even if you follow the theory that the stones are able to read the intent of the user, it's likely that only a very small number of people on that battlefield could summon the presence of mind to command the gauntlet, especially while their body is being ravaged by its raw power.



    Edit - the Gauntlet's magic being directly akin to sorcery is only my conjecture, based off of similar requirements for hand gestures (clicks, clenches, waves) and the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto as either a source of dimensional energy or harnessed for its powers directly.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 16 at 13:54

























    answered May 14 at 5:54









    Christopher VellaChristopher Vella

    1613




    1613












    • Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:46











    • The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

      – Christopher Vella
      May 16 at 13:49

















    • Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

      – Derek
      May 15 at 3:46











    • The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

      – Christopher Vella
      May 16 at 13:49
















    Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:46





    Can you provide reference for that claim that the Infinity Stones are a result of magic?

    – Derek
    May 15 at 3:46













    The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

    – Christopher Vella
    May 16 at 13:49





    The stones were created from six singularities by the Cosmic Entities, which you can see a relief of in Guardians of the Galaxy and as explained by "The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy". To my knowledge, there is no official word that explains the source of their powers; their likeness to sorcery is only my conjecture, based on the Time Stone's integration into the Eye of Agamotto and the gestures required to use the Gauntlets. I'll update my answer to stress that.

    – Christopher Vella
    May 16 at 13:49











    0














    Because it would kill them



    This is the entire theme of the Infinity War story. The good guys don't want to make sacrifices. They will not make plans that would send someone to their death. They say as much I think in Infinity War. When someone has to be sacrificed for the soul stone they have to fight each other because neither is willing to lose the other one. They are not ready to give up their lives to win. They are not ready to put survivor guilt on their friends.



    Thanos does not have this problem. He, without any thought, sacrifices Gamora. This is why Thanos wins, and the Avengers lose the first time. In the final moment Tony sees this. He realizes that sacrifices must be made, and he gives up his life. This completes the narrative tragedy of the Avengers.






    share|improve this answer





























      0














      Because it would kill them



      This is the entire theme of the Infinity War story. The good guys don't want to make sacrifices. They will not make plans that would send someone to their death. They say as much I think in Infinity War. When someone has to be sacrificed for the soul stone they have to fight each other because neither is willing to lose the other one. They are not ready to give up their lives to win. They are not ready to put survivor guilt on their friends.



      Thanos does not have this problem. He, without any thought, sacrifices Gamora. This is why Thanos wins, and the Avengers lose the first time. In the final moment Tony sees this. He realizes that sacrifices must be made, and he gives up his life. This completes the narrative tragedy of the Avengers.






      share|improve this answer



























        0












        0








        0







        Because it would kill them



        This is the entire theme of the Infinity War story. The good guys don't want to make sacrifices. They will not make plans that would send someone to their death. They say as much I think in Infinity War. When someone has to be sacrificed for the soul stone they have to fight each other because neither is willing to lose the other one. They are not ready to give up their lives to win. They are not ready to put survivor guilt on their friends.



        Thanos does not have this problem. He, without any thought, sacrifices Gamora. This is why Thanos wins, and the Avengers lose the first time. In the final moment Tony sees this. He realizes that sacrifices must be made, and he gives up his life. This completes the narrative tragedy of the Avengers.






        share|improve this answer















        Because it would kill them



        This is the entire theme of the Infinity War story. The good guys don't want to make sacrifices. They will not make plans that would send someone to their death. They say as much I think in Infinity War. When someone has to be sacrificed for the soul stone they have to fight each other because neither is willing to lose the other one. They are not ready to give up their lives to win. They are not ready to put survivor guilt on their friends.



        Thanos does not have this problem. He, without any thought, sacrifices Gamora. This is why Thanos wins, and the Avengers lose the first time. In the final moment Tony sees this. He realizes that sacrifices must be made, and he gives up his life. This completes the narrative tragedy of the Avengers.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 16 at 20:57









        Laurel

        8,29822857




        8,29822857










        answered May 16 at 19:45









        AndreyAndrey

        696617




        696617



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212300%2fwhy-didnt-the-avengers-use-this-object-earlier%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020