mdadm does not show every device as activeLinux Raid: mystical md_d devicemdadm raid5 failure. set wrong drive to faulty by accidentmdadm reassemble from spare disk crashed during resyncmdadm isn't rebuilding the arraymdadm: drive replacement shows up as spare and refuses to syncSoftware RAID 1 does not extend on two new additional drivesHow to fix my broken raid10 arraymdadm RAID6, recover 2 disk failure during reshapeRAID10 - Clean, degraded - Missing diskJBOD Failed to assemble after middle device Failed
Why is this integration method not valid?
Caught with my phone during an exam
Find this Unique UVC Palindrome ( ignoring signs and decimal) from Given Fractional Relationship
How to make Flex Markers appear in Logic Pro X?
Nunc est bibendum: gerund or gerundive?
Department head said that group project may be rejected. How to mitigate?
One word for 'the thing that attracts me'?
Team member is vehemently against code formatting
Can a UK national work as a paid shop assistant in the USA?
nginx conf: http2 module not working in Chrome in ubuntu 18.04
Is there a linguistic basses for how to translate John 8:43, or are translations basing their translation on context alone?
Unpreventable damage to Gideon, the Oathsworn
csname in newenviroment
Does attacking (or having a rider attack) cancel Charge/Pounce-like abilities?
Why starbase in not connected to the Trade Network?
Would this be a dangerous impeller to use for a drone?
Was murdering a slave illegal in American slavery, and if so, what punishments were given for it?
Proto-Indo-European (PIE) words with IPA
Surface of the 3x3x3 cube as a graph
Why "strap-on" boosters, and how do other people say it?
Why the work done is positive when bringing 2 opposite charges together?
Can a bard grant bardic inspiration to an unconscious creature?
Passport queue length in UK in relation to arrival method
Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand
mdadm does not show every device as active
Linux Raid: mystical md_d devicemdadm raid5 failure. set wrong drive to faulty by accidentmdadm reassemble from spare disk crashed during resyncmdadm isn't rebuilding the arraymdadm: drive replacement shows up as spare and refuses to syncSoftware RAID 1 does not extend on two new additional drivesHow to fix my broken raid10 arraymdadm RAID6, recover 2 disk failure during reshapeRAID10 - Clean, degraded - Missing diskJBOD Failed to assemble after middle device Failed
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
Recently, I had to resize a linux software RAID array. It has been a little bit complex as I was forced to do many steps to grow the device size while shrinking the number of members from 14 to 6. It nearly took a week. However, everything went fine and the LVM inside has not been harmed. Now the array seems to be fine, but shows only 4/6 devices as active:
[root@kvm24 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid10] [raid0]
md3 : active raid10 sdh3[7] sdn3[6] sdl3[10] sda3[17] sdf3[19] sdc3[18]
5559542784 blocks super 1.2 128K chunks 2 near-copies [6/4] [UUUUUU]
In the details, I can't see a problem:
[root@kvm24 ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md3
/dev/md3:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Wed Nov 1 23:53:09 2017
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size : 5559542784 (5301.99 GiB 5692.97 GB)
Used Dev Size : 1853180928 (1767.33 GiB 1897.66 GB)
Raid Devices : 6
Total Devices : 6
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Tue May 7 13:28:06 2019
State : active
Active Devices : 6
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : near=2
Chunk Size : 128K
Consistency Policy : unknown
Name : kvm24:3 (local to host kvm24)
UUID : 35833398:1c8291c5:8e817efc:6f99d541
Events : 582653
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
17 8 3 0 active sync set-A /dev/sda3
10 8 179 1 active sync set-B /dev/sdl3
18 8 35 2 active sync set-A /dev/sdc3
7 8 115 3 active sync set-B /dev/sdh3
19 8 83 4 active sync set-A /dev/sdf3
6 8 211 5 active sync set-B /dev/sdn3
To be honest, I didn't even realize that, until Check_MK told me CRIT - disk state is [6/4] [UUUUUU] (expected 4 disks to be up).
What might be the problem with the array?
linux raid centos7 mdadm
add a comment |
Recently, I had to resize a linux software RAID array. It has been a little bit complex as I was forced to do many steps to grow the device size while shrinking the number of members from 14 to 6. It nearly took a week. However, everything went fine and the LVM inside has not been harmed. Now the array seems to be fine, but shows only 4/6 devices as active:
[root@kvm24 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid10] [raid0]
md3 : active raid10 sdh3[7] sdn3[6] sdl3[10] sda3[17] sdf3[19] sdc3[18]
5559542784 blocks super 1.2 128K chunks 2 near-copies [6/4] [UUUUUU]
In the details, I can't see a problem:
[root@kvm24 ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md3
/dev/md3:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Wed Nov 1 23:53:09 2017
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size : 5559542784 (5301.99 GiB 5692.97 GB)
Used Dev Size : 1853180928 (1767.33 GiB 1897.66 GB)
Raid Devices : 6
Total Devices : 6
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Tue May 7 13:28:06 2019
State : active
Active Devices : 6
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : near=2
Chunk Size : 128K
Consistency Policy : unknown
Name : kvm24:3 (local to host kvm24)
UUID : 35833398:1c8291c5:8e817efc:6f99d541
Events : 582653
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
17 8 3 0 active sync set-A /dev/sda3
10 8 179 1 active sync set-B /dev/sdl3
18 8 35 2 active sync set-A /dev/sdc3
7 8 115 3 active sync set-B /dev/sdh3
19 8 83 4 active sync set-A /dev/sdf3
6 8 211 5 active sync set-B /dev/sdn3
To be honest, I didn't even realize that, until Check_MK told me CRIT - disk state is [6/4] [UUUUUU] (expected 4 disks to be up).
What might be the problem with the array?
linux raid centos7 mdadm
add a comment |
Recently, I had to resize a linux software RAID array. It has been a little bit complex as I was forced to do many steps to grow the device size while shrinking the number of members from 14 to 6. It nearly took a week. However, everything went fine and the LVM inside has not been harmed. Now the array seems to be fine, but shows only 4/6 devices as active:
[root@kvm24 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid10] [raid0]
md3 : active raid10 sdh3[7] sdn3[6] sdl3[10] sda3[17] sdf3[19] sdc3[18]
5559542784 blocks super 1.2 128K chunks 2 near-copies [6/4] [UUUUUU]
In the details, I can't see a problem:
[root@kvm24 ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md3
/dev/md3:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Wed Nov 1 23:53:09 2017
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size : 5559542784 (5301.99 GiB 5692.97 GB)
Used Dev Size : 1853180928 (1767.33 GiB 1897.66 GB)
Raid Devices : 6
Total Devices : 6
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Tue May 7 13:28:06 2019
State : active
Active Devices : 6
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : near=2
Chunk Size : 128K
Consistency Policy : unknown
Name : kvm24:3 (local to host kvm24)
UUID : 35833398:1c8291c5:8e817efc:6f99d541
Events : 582653
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
17 8 3 0 active sync set-A /dev/sda3
10 8 179 1 active sync set-B /dev/sdl3
18 8 35 2 active sync set-A /dev/sdc3
7 8 115 3 active sync set-B /dev/sdh3
19 8 83 4 active sync set-A /dev/sdf3
6 8 211 5 active sync set-B /dev/sdn3
To be honest, I didn't even realize that, until Check_MK told me CRIT - disk state is [6/4] [UUUUUU] (expected 4 disks to be up).
What might be the problem with the array?
linux raid centos7 mdadm
Recently, I had to resize a linux software RAID array. It has been a little bit complex as I was forced to do many steps to grow the device size while shrinking the number of members from 14 to 6. It nearly took a week. However, everything went fine and the LVM inside has not been harmed. Now the array seems to be fine, but shows only 4/6 devices as active:
[root@kvm24 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid10] [raid0]
md3 : active raid10 sdh3[7] sdn3[6] sdl3[10] sda3[17] sdf3[19] sdc3[18]
5559542784 blocks super 1.2 128K chunks 2 near-copies [6/4] [UUUUUU]
In the details, I can't see a problem:
[root@kvm24 ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md3
/dev/md3:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Wed Nov 1 23:53:09 2017
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size : 5559542784 (5301.99 GiB 5692.97 GB)
Used Dev Size : 1853180928 (1767.33 GiB 1897.66 GB)
Raid Devices : 6
Total Devices : 6
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Tue May 7 13:28:06 2019
State : active
Active Devices : 6
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : near=2
Chunk Size : 128K
Consistency Policy : unknown
Name : kvm24:3 (local to host kvm24)
UUID : 35833398:1c8291c5:8e817efc:6f99d541
Events : 582653
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
17 8 3 0 active sync set-A /dev/sda3
10 8 179 1 active sync set-B /dev/sdl3
18 8 35 2 active sync set-A /dev/sdc3
7 8 115 3 active sync set-B /dev/sdh3
19 8 83 4 active sync set-A /dev/sdf3
6 8 211 5 active sync set-B /dev/sdn3
To be honest, I didn't even realize that, until Check_MK told me CRIT - disk state is [6/4] [UUUUUU] (expected 4 disks to be up).
What might be the problem with the array?
linux raid centos7 mdadm
linux raid centos7 mdadm
edited May 8 at 19:52
smartenbergen
asked May 8 at 11:32
smartenbergensmartenbergen
605
605
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Everything is alright with your RAID, at least according to these logs. Check dmesg for more details on what happend with your RAID earlier. I don't know what is your Check_Ml, but RAID will re-sync from time to time and it's something normal. If you're refering to RAID state, this could be: clean, but also active or active sync. If you see [UUUUUU], then each U here means that each drive is synchronized. You should be worried if one of them will be replaced with _, meaning that one drive is inactive/failed. You can read about it at https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/admin-guide/md.html
Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.
– smartenbergen
May 8 at 19:53
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f966362%2fmdadm-does-not-show-every-device-as-active%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Everything is alright with your RAID, at least according to these logs. Check dmesg for more details on what happend with your RAID earlier. I don't know what is your Check_Ml, but RAID will re-sync from time to time and it's something normal. If you're refering to RAID state, this could be: clean, but also active or active sync. If you see [UUUUUU], then each U here means that each drive is synchronized. You should be worried if one of them will be replaced with _, meaning that one drive is inactive/failed. You can read about it at https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/admin-guide/md.html
Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.
– smartenbergen
May 8 at 19:53
add a comment |
Everything is alright with your RAID, at least according to these logs. Check dmesg for more details on what happend with your RAID earlier. I don't know what is your Check_Ml, but RAID will re-sync from time to time and it's something normal. If you're refering to RAID state, this could be: clean, but also active or active sync. If you see [UUUUUU], then each U here means that each drive is synchronized. You should be worried if one of them will be replaced with _, meaning that one drive is inactive/failed. You can read about it at https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/admin-guide/md.html
Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.
– smartenbergen
May 8 at 19:53
add a comment |
Everything is alright with your RAID, at least according to these logs. Check dmesg for more details on what happend with your RAID earlier. I don't know what is your Check_Ml, but RAID will re-sync from time to time and it's something normal. If you're refering to RAID state, this could be: clean, but also active or active sync. If you see [UUUUUU], then each U here means that each drive is synchronized. You should be worried if one of them will be replaced with _, meaning that one drive is inactive/failed. You can read about it at https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/admin-guide/md.html
Everything is alright with your RAID, at least according to these logs. Check dmesg for more details on what happend with your RAID earlier. I don't know what is your Check_Ml, but RAID will re-sync from time to time and it's something normal. If you're refering to RAID state, this could be: clean, but also active or active sync. If you see [UUUUUU], then each U here means that each drive is synchronized. You should be worried if one of them will be replaced with _, meaning that one drive is inactive/failed. You can read about it at https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/admin-guide/md.html
answered May 8 at 13:24
ComarComar
27316
27316
Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.
– smartenbergen
May 8 at 19:53
add a comment |
Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.
– smartenbergen
May 8 at 19:53
Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.
– smartenbergen
May 8 at 19:53
Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.
– smartenbergen
May 8 at 19:53
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f966362%2fmdadm-does-not-show-every-device-as-active%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown