mdadm does not show every device as activeLinux Raid: mystical md_d devicemdadm raid5 failure. set wrong drive to faulty by accidentmdadm reassemble from spare disk crashed during resyncmdadm isn't rebuilding the arraymdadm: drive replacement shows up as spare and refuses to syncSoftware RAID 1 does not extend on two new additional drivesHow to fix my broken raid10 arraymdadm RAID6, recover 2 disk failure during reshapeRAID10 - Clean, degraded - Missing diskJBOD Failed to assemble after middle device Failed

Why is this integration method not valid?

Caught with my phone during an exam

Find this Unique UVC Palindrome ( ignoring signs and decimal) from Given Fractional Relationship

How to make Flex Markers appear in Logic Pro X?

Nunc est bibendum: gerund or gerundive?

Department head said that group project may be rejected. How to mitigate?

One word for 'the thing that attracts me'?

Team member is vehemently against code formatting

Can a UK national work as a paid shop assistant in the USA?

nginx conf: http2 module not working in Chrome in ubuntu 18.04

Is there a linguistic basses for how to translate John 8:43, or are translations basing their translation on context alone?

Unpreventable damage to Gideon, the Oathsworn

csname in newenviroment

Does attacking (or having a rider attack) cancel Charge/Pounce-like abilities?

Why starbase in not connected to the Trade Network?

Would this be a dangerous impeller to use for a drone?

Was murdering a slave illegal in American slavery, and if so, what punishments were given for it?

Proto-Indo-European (PIE) words with IPA

Surface of the 3x3x3 cube as a graph

Why "strap-on" boosters, and how do other people say it?

Why the work done is positive when bringing 2 opposite charges together?

Can a bard grant bardic inspiration to an unconscious creature?

Passport queue length in UK in relation to arrival method

Managing heat dissipation in a magic wand



mdadm does not show every device as active


Linux Raid: mystical md_d devicemdadm raid5 failure. set wrong drive to faulty by accidentmdadm reassemble from spare disk crashed during resyncmdadm isn't rebuilding the arraymdadm: drive replacement shows up as spare and refuses to syncSoftware RAID 1 does not extend on two new additional drivesHow to fix my broken raid10 arraymdadm RAID6, recover 2 disk failure during reshapeRAID10 - Clean, degraded - Missing diskJBOD Failed to assemble after middle device Failed






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















Recently, I had to resize a linux software RAID array. It has been a little bit complex as I was forced to do many steps to grow the device size while shrinking the number of members from 14 to 6. It nearly took a week. However, everything went fine and the LVM inside has not been harmed. Now the array seems to be fine, but shows only 4/6 devices as active:



[root@kvm24 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat 
Personalities : [raid10] [raid0]
md3 : active raid10 sdh3[7] sdn3[6] sdl3[10] sda3[17] sdf3[19] sdc3[18]
5559542784 blocks super 1.2 128K chunks 2 near-copies [6/4] [UUUUUU]


In the details, I can't see a problem:



[root@kvm24 ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md3 
/dev/md3:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Wed Nov 1 23:53:09 2017
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size : 5559542784 (5301.99 GiB 5692.97 GB)
Used Dev Size : 1853180928 (1767.33 GiB 1897.66 GB)
Raid Devices : 6
Total Devices : 6
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Update Time : Tue May 7 13:28:06 2019
State : active
Active Devices : 6
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0

Layout : near=2
Chunk Size : 128K

Consistency Policy : unknown

Name : kvm24:3 (local to host kvm24)
UUID : 35833398:1c8291c5:8e817efc:6f99d541
Events : 582653

Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
17 8 3 0 active sync set-A /dev/sda3
10 8 179 1 active sync set-B /dev/sdl3
18 8 35 2 active sync set-A /dev/sdc3
7 8 115 3 active sync set-B /dev/sdh3
19 8 83 4 active sync set-A /dev/sdf3
6 8 211 5 active sync set-B /dev/sdn3


To be honest, I didn't even realize that, until Check_MK told me CRIT - disk state is [6/4] [UUUUUU] (expected 4 disks to be up).



What might be the problem with the array?










share|improve this question






























    0















    Recently, I had to resize a linux software RAID array. It has been a little bit complex as I was forced to do many steps to grow the device size while shrinking the number of members from 14 to 6. It nearly took a week. However, everything went fine and the LVM inside has not been harmed. Now the array seems to be fine, but shows only 4/6 devices as active:



    [root@kvm24 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat 
    Personalities : [raid10] [raid0]
    md3 : active raid10 sdh3[7] sdn3[6] sdl3[10] sda3[17] sdf3[19] sdc3[18]
    5559542784 blocks super 1.2 128K chunks 2 near-copies [6/4] [UUUUUU]


    In the details, I can't see a problem:



    [root@kvm24 ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md3 
    /dev/md3:
    Version : 1.2
    Creation Time : Wed Nov 1 23:53:09 2017
    Raid Level : raid10
    Array Size : 5559542784 (5301.99 GiB 5692.97 GB)
    Used Dev Size : 1853180928 (1767.33 GiB 1897.66 GB)
    Raid Devices : 6
    Total Devices : 6
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

    Update Time : Tue May 7 13:28:06 2019
    State : active
    Active Devices : 6
    Working Devices : 6
    Failed Devices : 0
    Spare Devices : 0

    Layout : near=2
    Chunk Size : 128K

    Consistency Policy : unknown

    Name : kvm24:3 (local to host kvm24)
    UUID : 35833398:1c8291c5:8e817efc:6f99d541
    Events : 582653

    Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
    17 8 3 0 active sync set-A /dev/sda3
    10 8 179 1 active sync set-B /dev/sdl3
    18 8 35 2 active sync set-A /dev/sdc3
    7 8 115 3 active sync set-B /dev/sdh3
    19 8 83 4 active sync set-A /dev/sdf3
    6 8 211 5 active sync set-B /dev/sdn3


    To be honest, I didn't even realize that, until Check_MK told me CRIT - disk state is [6/4] [UUUUUU] (expected 4 disks to be up).



    What might be the problem with the array?










    share|improve this question


























      0












      0








      0








      Recently, I had to resize a linux software RAID array. It has been a little bit complex as I was forced to do many steps to grow the device size while shrinking the number of members from 14 to 6. It nearly took a week. However, everything went fine and the LVM inside has not been harmed. Now the array seems to be fine, but shows only 4/6 devices as active:



      [root@kvm24 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat 
      Personalities : [raid10] [raid0]
      md3 : active raid10 sdh3[7] sdn3[6] sdl3[10] sda3[17] sdf3[19] sdc3[18]
      5559542784 blocks super 1.2 128K chunks 2 near-copies [6/4] [UUUUUU]


      In the details, I can't see a problem:



      [root@kvm24 ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md3 
      /dev/md3:
      Version : 1.2
      Creation Time : Wed Nov 1 23:53:09 2017
      Raid Level : raid10
      Array Size : 5559542784 (5301.99 GiB 5692.97 GB)
      Used Dev Size : 1853180928 (1767.33 GiB 1897.66 GB)
      Raid Devices : 6
      Total Devices : 6
      Persistence : Superblock is persistent

      Update Time : Tue May 7 13:28:06 2019
      State : active
      Active Devices : 6
      Working Devices : 6
      Failed Devices : 0
      Spare Devices : 0

      Layout : near=2
      Chunk Size : 128K

      Consistency Policy : unknown

      Name : kvm24:3 (local to host kvm24)
      UUID : 35833398:1c8291c5:8e817efc:6f99d541
      Events : 582653

      Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
      17 8 3 0 active sync set-A /dev/sda3
      10 8 179 1 active sync set-B /dev/sdl3
      18 8 35 2 active sync set-A /dev/sdc3
      7 8 115 3 active sync set-B /dev/sdh3
      19 8 83 4 active sync set-A /dev/sdf3
      6 8 211 5 active sync set-B /dev/sdn3


      To be honest, I didn't even realize that, until Check_MK told me CRIT - disk state is [6/4] [UUUUUU] (expected 4 disks to be up).



      What might be the problem with the array?










      share|improve this question
















      Recently, I had to resize a linux software RAID array. It has been a little bit complex as I was forced to do many steps to grow the device size while shrinking the number of members from 14 to 6. It nearly took a week. However, everything went fine and the LVM inside has not been harmed. Now the array seems to be fine, but shows only 4/6 devices as active:



      [root@kvm24 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat 
      Personalities : [raid10] [raid0]
      md3 : active raid10 sdh3[7] sdn3[6] sdl3[10] sda3[17] sdf3[19] sdc3[18]
      5559542784 blocks super 1.2 128K chunks 2 near-copies [6/4] [UUUUUU]


      In the details, I can't see a problem:



      [root@kvm24 ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md3 
      /dev/md3:
      Version : 1.2
      Creation Time : Wed Nov 1 23:53:09 2017
      Raid Level : raid10
      Array Size : 5559542784 (5301.99 GiB 5692.97 GB)
      Used Dev Size : 1853180928 (1767.33 GiB 1897.66 GB)
      Raid Devices : 6
      Total Devices : 6
      Persistence : Superblock is persistent

      Update Time : Tue May 7 13:28:06 2019
      State : active
      Active Devices : 6
      Working Devices : 6
      Failed Devices : 0
      Spare Devices : 0

      Layout : near=2
      Chunk Size : 128K

      Consistency Policy : unknown

      Name : kvm24:3 (local to host kvm24)
      UUID : 35833398:1c8291c5:8e817efc:6f99d541
      Events : 582653

      Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
      17 8 3 0 active sync set-A /dev/sda3
      10 8 179 1 active sync set-B /dev/sdl3
      18 8 35 2 active sync set-A /dev/sdc3
      7 8 115 3 active sync set-B /dev/sdh3
      19 8 83 4 active sync set-A /dev/sdf3
      6 8 211 5 active sync set-B /dev/sdn3


      To be honest, I didn't even realize that, until Check_MK told me CRIT - disk state is [6/4] [UUUUUU] (expected 4 disks to be up).



      What might be the problem with the array?







      linux raid centos7 mdadm






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 8 at 19:52







      smartenbergen

















      asked May 8 at 11:32









      smartenbergensmartenbergen

      605




      605




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Everything is alright with your RAID, at least according to these logs. Check dmesg for more details on what happend with your RAID earlier. I don't know what is your Check_Ml, but RAID will re-sync from time to time and it's something normal. If you're refering to RAID state, this could be: clean, but also active or active sync. If you see [UUUUUU], then each U here means that each drive is synchronized. You should be worried if one of them will be replaced with _, meaning that one drive is inactive/failed. You can read about it at https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/admin-guide/md.html






          share|improve this answer























          • Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.

            – smartenbergen
            May 8 at 19:53











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "2"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f966362%2fmdadm-does-not-show-every-device-as-active%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          Everything is alright with your RAID, at least according to these logs. Check dmesg for more details on what happend with your RAID earlier. I don't know what is your Check_Ml, but RAID will re-sync from time to time and it's something normal. If you're refering to RAID state, this could be: clean, but also active or active sync. If you see [UUUUUU], then each U here means that each drive is synchronized. You should be worried if one of them will be replaced with _, meaning that one drive is inactive/failed. You can read about it at https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/admin-guide/md.html






          share|improve this answer























          • Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.

            – smartenbergen
            May 8 at 19:53















          0














          Everything is alright with your RAID, at least according to these logs. Check dmesg for more details on what happend with your RAID earlier. I don't know what is your Check_Ml, but RAID will re-sync from time to time and it's something normal. If you're refering to RAID state, this could be: clean, but also active or active sync. If you see [UUUUUU], then each U here means that each drive is synchronized. You should be worried if one of them will be replaced with _, meaning that one drive is inactive/failed. You can read about it at https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/admin-guide/md.html






          share|improve this answer























          • Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.

            – smartenbergen
            May 8 at 19:53













          0












          0








          0







          Everything is alright with your RAID, at least according to these logs. Check dmesg for more details on what happend with your RAID earlier. I don't know what is your Check_Ml, but RAID will re-sync from time to time and it's something normal. If you're refering to RAID state, this could be: clean, but also active or active sync. If you see [UUUUUU], then each U here means that each drive is synchronized. You should be worried if one of them will be replaced with _, meaning that one drive is inactive/failed. You can read about it at https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/admin-guide/md.html






          share|improve this answer













          Everything is alright with your RAID, at least according to these logs. Check dmesg for more details on what happend with your RAID earlier. I don't know what is your Check_Ml, but RAID will re-sync from time to time and it's something normal. If you're refering to RAID state, this could be: clean, but also active or active sync. If you see [UUUUUU], then each U here means that each drive is synchronized. You should be worried if one of them will be replaced with _, meaning that one drive is inactive/failed. You can read about it at https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/admin-guide/md.html







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 8 at 13:24









          ComarComar

          27316




          27316












          • Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.

            – smartenbergen
            May 8 at 19:53

















          • Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.

            – smartenbergen
            May 8 at 19:53
















          Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.

          – smartenbergen
          May 8 at 19:53





          Sorry, it should be Check_MK, not Check_Ml. I have already tried repair and check, but that does not change anything.

          – smartenbergen
          May 8 at 19:53

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f966362%2fmdadm-does-not-show-every-device-as-active%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to write a 12-bar blues melodyI-IV-V blues progressionHow to play the bridges in a standard blues progressionHow does Gdim7 fit in C# minor?question on a certain chord progressionMusicology of Melody12 bar blues, spread rhythm: alternative to 6th chord to avoid finger stretchChord progressions/ Root key/ MelodiesHow to put chords (POP-EDM) under a given lead vocal melody (starting from a good knowledge in music theory)Are there “rules” for improvising with the minor pentatonic scale over 12-bar shuffle?Confusion about blues scale and chords

          What if the end-user didn't have the required library?What is setup.py?What is a clean, pythonic way to have multiple constructors in Python?What does Ruby have that Python doesn't, and vice versa?What is the reason for having '//' in Python?How do I create a namespace package in Python?How to package shared objects that python modules depend on?setuptools vs. distutils: why is distutils still a thing?Navigation in Windows 10 vs code not going to virtualenv library when the same library is installed at user levelPython create package for local usePackaging a project that uses multiple python versionsWhy is permission denied on pip install except for when “--user” is included at end of command?

          Esgonzo ibérico Índice Descrición Distribución Hábitat Ameazas Notas Véxase tamén "Acerca dos nomes dos anfibios e réptiles galegos""Chalcides bedriagai"Chalcides bedriagai en Carrascal, L. M. Salvador, A. (Eds). Enciclopedia virtual de los vertebrados españoles. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid. España.Fotos