A king was born in a year that was a perfect square, lived a perfect square number of years, and also died in a year that was a perfect squareRiddle Man's ageWhy is every prime number (5 and higher) divisible by 3 when you square it and subtract 1?The Mendoza LineProfessor Halfbrain and the odd perfect numberEgyptian square pyramidWhat number am I ? (square number and triangle number)A Gathering of Number-TheoristsMother and DaughterA certain partition of 130Finni's tricky gameCreate the numbers 1 - 30 using the digits 2, 0, 1, 9 in this particular order!

Run specific apex tests during "sfdx force:source:deploy"

Can there be an UN resolution to remove a country from the UNSC?

How does the spell Remove Curse interact with a Sword of Vengeance?

How much will studying magic in an academy cost?

Hot coffee brewing solutions for deep woods camping

How is hair tissue mineral analysis performed?

How to avoid voltage drop when using full bridge rectifier as reverse polarity protection

What does "play with your toy’s toys" mean?

How many people are necessary to maintain modern civilisation?

Minimum distance between holes in inner tube

Would it be a copyright violation if I made a character’s full name refer to a song?

Is "Busen" just the area between the breasts?

How to get cool night-vision without lame drawbacks?

What was the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft escape tunnel?

Can someone suggest a path to study Mordell-Weil theorem for someone studying on their own?

What's the difference between a deep fryer and a chip pan?

How does DC work with natural 20?

Can White Castle?

What does the hyphen "-" mean in "tar xzf -"?

Loss of power when I remove item from the outlet

Is there a way, while dragging, to "snap" to the nearest guide?

Why do textbooks often include the solutions to odd or even numbered problems but not both?

Did the CIA blow up a Siberian pipeline in 1982?

"How can you guarantee that you won't change/quit job after just couple of months?" How to respond?



A king was born in a year that was a perfect square, lived a perfect square number of years, and also died in a year that was a perfect square


Riddle Man's ageWhy is every prime number (5 and higher) divisible by 3 when you square it and subtract 1?The Mendoza LineProfessor Halfbrain and the odd perfect numberEgyptian square pyramidWhat number am I ? (square number and triangle number)A Gathering of Number-TheoristsMother and DaughterA certain partition of 130Finni's tricky gameCreate the numbers 1 - 30 using the digits 2, 0, 1, 9 in this particular order!






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


In which year could he have been born?
(A) 1936
(B) 1764
(C) 1600
(D) 1444



The answer's (C). Why?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The answer's (C), but I guess the question kinda gives it away.
    $endgroup$
    – Annosz
    Jun 5 at 11:12






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A related puzzle ... that said, did you find this in a book or somewhere and you need help with the explanation, or what?
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Jun 5 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry for not clarifying, I needed an explanation. And no, I did not find it in a book. My friend asked it from me.
    $endgroup$
    – Siddharth Garg
    Jun 6 at 8:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think you've made a pretty big assumption about the lifespan of this king. For example, (A) could easily be the answer, provided the king lives for 1089 years.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian MacDonald
    Jun 6 at 15:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor Of course, the OP never said the King was Human. Could be an immortal jellyfish.
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    Jun 6 at 16:38

















4












$begingroup$


In which year could he have been born?
(A) 1936
(B) 1764
(C) 1600
(D) 1444



The answer's (C). Why?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The answer's (C), but I guess the question kinda gives it away.
    $endgroup$
    – Annosz
    Jun 5 at 11:12






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A related puzzle ... that said, did you find this in a book or somewhere and you need help with the explanation, or what?
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Jun 5 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry for not clarifying, I needed an explanation. And no, I did not find it in a book. My friend asked it from me.
    $endgroup$
    – Siddharth Garg
    Jun 6 at 8:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think you've made a pretty big assumption about the lifespan of this king. For example, (A) could easily be the answer, provided the king lives for 1089 years.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian MacDonald
    Jun 6 at 15:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor Of course, the OP never said the King was Human. Could be an immortal jellyfish.
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    Jun 6 at 16:38













4












4








4





$begingroup$


In which year could he have been born?
(A) 1936
(B) 1764
(C) 1600
(D) 1444



The answer's (C). Why?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




In which year could he have been born?
(A) 1936
(B) 1764
(C) 1600
(D) 1444



The answer's (C). Why?







number-theory






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 6 at 15:01









Lawrence

6,59621449




6,59621449










asked Jun 5 at 11:04









Siddharth GargSiddharth Garg

516




516







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The answer's (C), but I guess the question kinda gives it away.
    $endgroup$
    – Annosz
    Jun 5 at 11:12






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A related puzzle ... that said, did you find this in a book or somewhere and you need help with the explanation, or what?
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Jun 5 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry for not clarifying, I needed an explanation. And no, I did not find it in a book. My friend asked it from me.
    $endgroup$
    – Siddharth Garg
    Jun 6 at 8:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think you've made a pretty big assumption about the lifespan of this king. For example, (A) could easily be the answer, provided the king lives for 1089 years.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian MacDonald
    Jun 6 at 15:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor Of course, the OP never said the King was Human. Could be an immortal jellyfish.
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    Jun 6 at 16:38












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The answer's (C), but I guess the question kinda gives it away.
    $endgroup$
    – Annosz
    Jun 5 at 11:12






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A related puzzle ... that said, did you find this in a book or somewhere and you need help with the explanation, or what?
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Jun 5 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry for not clarifying, I needed an explanation. And no, I did not find it in a book. My friend asked it from me.
    $endgroup$
    – Siddharth Garg
    Jun 6 at 8:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think you've made a pretty big assumption about the lifespan of this king. For example, (A) could easily be the answer, provided the king lives for 1089 years.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian MacDonald
    Jun 6 at 15:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor Of course, the OP never said the King was Human. Could be an immortal jellyfish.
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    Jun 6 at 16:38







3




3




$begingroup$
The answer's (C), but I guess the question kinda gives it away.
$endgroup$
– Annosz
Jun 5 at 11:12




$begingroup$
The answer's (C), but I guess the question kinda gives it away.
$endgroup$
– Annosz
Jun 5 at 11:12




3




3




$begingroup$
A related puzzle ... that said, did you find this in a book or somewhere and you need help with the explanation, or what?
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
Jun 5 at 12:38




$begingroup$
A related puzzle ... that said, did you find this in a book or somewhere and you need help with the explanation, or what?
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
Jun 5 at 12:38












$begingroup$
Sorry for not clarifying, I needed an explanation. And no, I did not find it in a book. My friend asked it from me.
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Garg
Jun 6 at 8:46




$begingroup$
Sorry for not clarifying, I needed an explanation. And no, I did not find it in a book. My friend asked it from me.
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Garg
Jun 6 at 8:46




1




1




$begingroup$
I think you've made a pretty big assumption about the lifespan of this king. For example, (A) could easily be the answer, provided the king lives for 1089 years.
$endgroup$
– Ian MacDonald
Jun 6 at 15:14




$begingroup$
I think you've made a pretty big assumption about the lifespan of this king. For example, (A) could easily be the answer, provided the king lives for 1089 years.
$endgroup$
– Ian MacDonald
Jun 6 at 15:14




1




1




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor Of course, the OP never said the King was Human. Could be an immortal jellyfish.
$endgroup$
– Tezra
Jun 6 at 16:38




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor Of course, the OP never said the King was Human. Could be an immortal jellyfish.
$endgroup$
– Tezra
Jun 6 at 16:38










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















20












$begingroup$

Given that the question contains its own answer, presumably what's wanted here is an explanation, so here is one.



Suppose the king is born in year $a^2$, lives $b^2$ years, and dies in year $c^2$ then we have $a^2+b^2=c^2$ (note: we'd better assume he lives an exact integer number of years, because otherwise this equation could be off by one).



There is an easy and stupid solution: we can take $b=0$ (this makes some assumptions about the rules of succession in the country whose king we're talking about!) in which case any perfect-square year will do. I assume we're not supposed to do this :-).



Otherwise, note that the next square after $a^2$ is $a^2+2a+1$, and the next is $a^2+4a+4$. Here we have $asimeq40$ and assuming our king is human his year of death is going to have to be $a^2+2a+1$ because $4a+4$ is too big to be anyone's age at death, which means that $2a+1$ is a square.



The values of $a$ are, in order, 44,42,40,38; so the values of $2a+1$ are 89,85,81,77. The third of these is a square and the others aren't.



(None of the other numbers there is within 1 of being a square, so actually we don't need to assume that the king lives an exact integer number of years after all.)






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    About the eventuality of b=0, this guy was born 20 years to late : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_I_of_France
    $endgroup$
    – Evargalo
    Jun 5 at 15:10


















4












$begingroup$

So, the answer is C) 1600, which is $40^2$.



Ignoring the trivial case where he died the year he was born, $40+1=41$ so $41^2=1681$ (by definition a perfect square).



$1681-1600 = 81$ years, which is a reasonable life span and is $9^2$.



This is the easiest math puzzle ever! All I did was add 1 and it solved itself! :3



(Gareth was first, but this is a much simpler method. ^^;)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't think this is a simpler method than Gareth's. It is the same method, but without the demonstration that this is the only solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Evargalo
    Jun 6 at 15:31










  • $begingroup$
    @Evargalo As Ian mentioned, living for 1089 years would make A valid (we were not told how old the king could live to be, or that he is human), so strictly there are other solutions. Also, Gareth solved for the years lived (I think, he lost me on "The values of A are"); At the very least, I think this is simpler for non-math people to follow. (it's easier to verify assertions of fact than a proof)
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    Jun 6 at 16:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the question wasn't "what's the solution". Indeed, the solution was given in the question. The question was "why is this the solution", indicating the OP wants an explanation of why that (and, one can safely infer, why only that) is a solution. You've answered the problem in the question, but not the question itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Jun 6 at 23:32













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84711%2fa-king-was-born-in-a-year-that-was-a-perfect-square-lived-a-perfect-square-numb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









20












$begingroup$

Given that the question contains its own answer, presumably what's wanted here is an explanation, so here is one.



Suppose the king is born in year $a^2$, lives $b^2$ years, and dies in year $c^2$ then we have $a^2+b^2=c^2$ (note: we'd better assume he lives an exact integer number of years, because otherwise this equation could be off by one).



There is an easy and stupid solution: we can take $b=0$ (this makes some assumptions about the rules of succession in the country whose king we're talking about!) in which case any perfect-square year will do. I assume we're not supposed to do this :-).



Otherwise, note that the next square after $a^2$ is $a^2+2a+1$, and the next is $a^2+4a+4$. Here we have $asimeq40$ and assuming our king is human his year of death is going to have to be $a^2+2a+1$ because $4a+4$ is too big to be anyone's age at death, which means that $2a+1$ is a square.



The values of $a$ are, in order, 44,42,40,38; so the values of $2a+1$ are 89,85,81,77. The third of these is a square and the others aren't.



(None of the other numbers there is within 1 of being a square, so actually we don't need to assume that the king lives an exact integer number of years after all.)






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    About the eventuality of b=0, this guy was born 20 years to late : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_I_of_France
    $endgroup$
    – Evargalo
    Jun 5 at 15:10















20












$begingroup$

Given that the question contains its own answer, presumably what's wanted here is an explanation, so here is one.



Suppose the king is born in year $a^2$, lives $b^2$ years, and dies in year $c^2$ then we have $a^2+b^2=c^2$ (note: we'd better assume he lives an exact integer number of years, because otherwise this equation could be off by one).



There is an easy and stupid solution: we can take $b=0$ (this makes some assumptions about the rules of succession in the country whose king we're talking about!) in which case any perfect-square year will do. I assume we're not supposed to do this :-).



Otherwise, note that the next square after $a^2$ is $a^2+2a+1$, and the next is $a^2+4a+4$. Here we have $asimeq40$ and assuming our king is human his year of death is going to have to be $a^2+2a+1$ because $4a+4$ is too big to be anyone's age at death, which means that $2a+1$ is a square.



The values of $a$ are, in order, 44,42,40,38; so the values of $2a+1$ are 89,85,81,77. The third of these is a square and the others aren't.



(None of the other numbers there is within 1 of being a square, so actually we don't need to assume that the king lives an exact integer number of years after all.)






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    About the eventuality of b=0, this guy was born 20 years to late : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_I_of_France
    $endgroup$
    – Evargalo
    Jun 5 at 15:10













20












20








20





$begingroup$

Given that the question contains its own answer, presumably what's wanted here is an explanation, so here is one.



Suppose the king is born in year $a^2$, lives $b^2$ years, and dies in year $c^2$ then we have $a^2+b^2=c^2$ (note: we'd better assume he lives an exact integer number of years, because otherwise this equation could be off by one).



There is an easy and stupid solution: we can take $b=0$ (this makes some assumptions about the rules of succession in the country whose king we're talking about!) in which case any perfect-square year will do. I assume we're not supposed to do this :-).



Otherwise, note that the next square after $a^2$ is $a^2+2a+1$, and the next is $a^2+4a+4$. Here we have $asimeq40$ and assuming our king is human his year of death is going to have to be $a^2+2a+1$ because $4a+4$ is too big to be anyone's age at death, which means that $2a+1$ is a square.



The values of $a$ are, in order, 44,42,40,38; so the values of $2a+1$ are 89,85,81,77. The third of these is a square and the others aren't.



(None of the other numbers there is within 1 of being a square, so actually we don't need to assume that the king lives an exact integer number of years after all.)






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Given that the question contains its own answer, presumably what's wanted here is an explanation, so here is one.



Suppose the king is born in year $a^2$, lives $b^2$ years, and dies in year $c^2$ then we have $a^2+b^2=c^2$ (note: we'd better assume he lives an exact integer number of years, because otherwise this equation could be off by one).



There is an easy and stupid solution: we can take $b=0$ (this makes some assumptions about the rules of succession in the country whose king we're talking about!) in which case any perfect-square year will do. I assume we're not supposed to do this :-).



Otherwise, note that the next square after $a^2$ is $a^2+2a+1$, and the next is $a^2+4a+4$. Here we have $asimeq40$ and assuming our king is human his year of death is going to have to be $a^2+2a+1$ because $4a+4$ is too big to be anyone's age at death, which means that $2a+1$ is a square.



The values of $a$ are, in order, 44,42,40,38; so the values of $2a+1$ are 89,85,81,77. The third of these is a square and the others aren't.



(None of the other numbers there is within 1 of being a square, so actually we don't need to assume that the king lives an exact integer number of years after all.)







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jun 5 at 11:45









Gareth McCaughanGareth McCaughan

74.7k3189289




74.7k3189289







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    About the eventuality of b=0, this guy was born 20 years to late : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_I_of_France
    $endgroup$
    – Evargalo
    Jun 5 at 15:10












  • 5




    $begingroup$
    About the eventuality of b=0, this guy was born 20 years to late : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_I_of_France
    $endgroup$
    – Evargalo
    Jun 5 at 15:10







5




5




$begingroup$
About the eventuality of b=0, this guy was born 20 years to late : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_I_of_France
$endgroup$
– Evargalo
Jun 5 at 15:10




$begingroup$
About the eventuality of b=0, this guy was born 20 years to late : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_I_of_France
$endgroup$
– Evargalo
Jun 5 at 15:10













4












$begingroup$

So, the answer is C) 1600, which is $40^2$.



Ignoring the trivial case where he died the year he was born, $40+1=41$ so $41^2=1681$ (by definition a perfect square).



$1681-1600 = 81$ years, which is a reasonable life span and is $9^2$.



This is the easiest math puzzle ever! All I did was add 1 and it solved itself! :3



(Gareth was first, but this is a much simpler method. ^^;)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't think this is a simpler method than Gareth's. It is the same method, but without the demonstration that this is the only solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Evargalo
    Jun 6 at 15:31










  • $begingroup$
    @Evargalo As Ian mentioned, living for 1089 years would make A valid (we were not told how old the king could live to be, or that he is human), so strictly there are other solutions. Also, Gareth solved for the years lived (I think, he lost me on "The values of A are"); At the very least, I think this is simpler for non-math people to follow. (it's easier to verify assertions of fact than a proof)
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    Jun 6 at 16:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the question wasn't "what's the solution". Indeed, the solution was given in the question. The question was "why is this the solution", indicating the OP wants an explanation of why that (and, one can safely infer, why only that) is a solution. You've answered the problem in the question, but not the question itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Jun 6 at 23:32















4












$begingroup$

So, the answer is C) 1600, which is $40^2$.



Ignoring the trivial case where he died the year he was born, $40+1=41$ so $41^2=1681$ (by definition a perfect square).



$1681-1600 = 81$ years, which is a reasonable life span and is $9^2$.



This is the easiest math puzzle ever! All I did was add 1 and it solved itself! :3



(Gareth was first, but this is a much simpler method. ^^;)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't think this is a simpler method than Gareth's. It is the same method, but without the demonstration that this is the only solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Evargalo
    Jun 6 at 15:31










  • $begingroup$
    @Evargalo As Ian mentioned, living for 1089 years would make A valid (we were not told how old the king could live to be, or that he is human), so strictly there are other solutions. Also, Gareth solved for the years lived (I think, he lost me on "The values of A are"); At the very least, I think this is simpler for non-math people to follow. (it's easier to verify assertions of fact than a proof)
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    Jun 6 at 16:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the question wasn't "what's the solution". Indeed, the solution was given in the question. The question was "why is this the solution", indicating the OP wants an explanation of why that (and, one can safely infer, why only that) is a solution. You've answered the problem in the question, but not the question itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Jun 6 at 23:32













4












4








4





$begingroup$

So, the answer is C) 1600, which is $40^2$.



Ignoring the trivial case where he died the year he was born, $40+1=41$ so $41^2=1681$ (by definition a perfect square).



$1681-1600 = 81$ years, which is a reasonable life span and is $9^2$.



This is the easiest math puzzle ever! All I did was add 1 and it solved itself! :3



(Gareth was first, but this is a much simpler method. ^^;)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



So, the answer is C) 1600, which is $40^2$.



Ignoring the trivial case where he died the year he was born, $40+1=41$ so $41^2=1681$ (by definition a perfect square).



$1681-1600 = 81$ years, which is a reasonable life span and is $9^2$.



This is the easiest math puzzle ever! All I did was add 1 and it solved itself! :3



(Gareth was first, but this is a much simpler method. ^^;)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jun 6 at 16:35









a stone arachnid

1717




1717










answered Jun 5 at 19:40









TezraTezra

1414




1414











  • $begingroup$
    I don't think this is a simpler method than Gareth's. It is the same method, but without the demonstration that this is the only solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Evargalo
    Jun 6 at 15:31










  • $begingroup$
    @Evargalo As Ian mentioned, living for 1089 years would make A valid (we were not told how old the king could live to be, or that he is human), so strictly there are other solutions. Also, Gareth solved for the years lived (I think, he lost me on "The values of A are"); At the very least, I think this is simpler for non-math people to follow. (it's easier to verify assertions of fact than a proof)
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    Jun 6 at 16:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the question wasn't "what's the solution". Indeed, the solution was given in the question. The question was "why is this the solution", indicating the OP wants an explanation of why that (and, one can safely infer, why only that) is a solution. You've answered the problem in the question, but not the question itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Jun 6 at 23:32
















  • $begingroup$
    I don't think this is a simpler method than Gareth's. It is the same method, but without the demonstration that this is the only solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Evargalo
    Jun 6 at 15:31










  • $begingroup$
    @Evargalo As Ian mentioned, living for 1089 years would make A valid (we were not told how old the king could live to be, or that he is human), so strictly there are other solutions. Also, Gareth solved for the years lived (I think, he lost me on "The values of A are"); At the very least, I think this is simpler for non-math people to follow. (it's easier to verify assertions of fact than a proof)
    $endgroup$
    – Tezra
    Jun 6 at 16:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the question wasn't "what's the solution". Indeed, the solution was given in the question. The question was "why is this the solution", indicating the OP wants an explanation of why that (and, one can safely infer, why only that) is a solution. You've answered the problem in the question, but not the question itself.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Jun 6 at 23:32















$begingroup$
I don't think this is a simpler method than Gareth's. It is the same method, but without the demonstration that this is the only solution.
$endgroup$
– Evargalo
Jun 6 at 15:31




$begingroup$
I don't think this is a simpler method than Gareth's. It is the same method, but without the demonstration that this is the only solution.
$endgroup$
– Evargalo
Jun 6 at 15:31












$begingroup$
@Evargalo As Ian mentioned, living for 1089 years would make A valid (we were not told how old the king could live to be, or that he is human), so strictly there are other solutions. Also, Gareth solved for the years lived (I think, he lost me on "The values of A are"); At the very least, I think this is simpler for non-math people to follow. (it's easier to verify assertions of fact than a proof)
$endgroup$
– Tezra
Jun 6 at 16:52




$begingroup$
@Evargalo As Ian mentioned, living for 1089 years would make A valid (we were not told how old the king could live to be, or that he is human), so strictly there are other solutions. Also, Gareth solved for the years lived (I think, he lost me on "The values of A are"); At the very least, I think this is simpler for non-math people to follow. (it's easier to verify assertions of fact than a proof)
$endgroup$
– Tezra
Jun 6 at 16:52




1




1




$begingroup$
But the question wasn't "what's the solution". Indeed, the solution was given in the question. The question was "why is this the solution", indicating the OP wants an explanation of why that (and, one can safely infer, why only that) is a solution. You've answered the problem in the question, but not the question itself.
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Jun 6 at 23:32




$begingroup$
But the question wasn't "what's the solution". Indeed, the solution was given in the question. The question was "why is this the solution", indicating the OP wants an explanation of why that (and, one can safely infer, why only that) is a solution. You've answered the problem in the question, but not the question itself.
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Jun 6 at 23:32

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84711%2fa-king-was-born-in-a-year-that-was-a-perfect-square-lived-a-perfect-square-numb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company